Discharge solidifier and malodour control
11103621 · 2021-08-31
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61L28/0092
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61L28/0011
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
An ostomy bag insert (104) comprising a polyacrylate superabsorbent (300) and a powdered zeolite (301). The ostomy bag insert is configured to absorb fluids excreted by the body and to control odours resultant from the excreted matter within the ostomy bag (100). The present zeolite exhibits enhanced odour control.
Claims
1. A composition comprising: a polyacrylate superabsorbent an odor controlling agent and a zeolite blend; wherein the zeolite blend comprises a hydrophilic zeolite and a hydrophobic zeolite; and wherein the polyacrylate superabsorbent comprises sodium polyacrylate or calcium polyacrylate.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the zeolite blend is microporous.
3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the zeolite blend is natural or synthetic.
4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the hydrophobic zeolite comprises an ammonium zeolite.
5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the hydrophilic zeolite comprises sodium aluminosilicate.
6. A composition comprising: a polyacrylate superabsorbent, an odor controlling agent, and a zeolite blend; wherein the zeolite blend comprises a hydrophilic zeolite and a hydrophobic zeolite; and wherein the zeolite blend comprises a naturally sourced zeolite selected from analcime, chabazite, clinoptilolite, heulandite, natrolite, phillipsite, and stilbite.
7. The composition of claim 1, wherein the zeolite blend is a powder.
8. The composition of claim 1, wherein the superabsorbent is coated with the zeolite blend.
9. The composition of claim 8, wherein the zeolite blend is bound to the superabsorbent by electrostatic forces.
10. A composition comprising: a polyacrylate superabsorbent, an odor controlling agent, and a zeolite blend; wherein the zeolite blend comprises a hydrophilic zeolite and a hydrophobic zeolite; and wherein the zeolite blend comprises a particle size equal to or less than 0.15 mm.
11. The composition of claim 1, wherein the superabsorbent comprises a polymer of cross linked sodium polyacrylate or calcium polyacrylate.
12. The composition of claim 1, wherein the superabsorbent comprises fibers.
13. The composition of claim 1, wherein the superabsorbent comprises a starch or an alkaline metal polyacrylate.
14. The composition of claim 1, wherein the superabsorbent comprises a granular configuration.
15. The composition of claim 14, wherein the granular configuration of the polyacrylate superabsorbent is greater in size than that of the zeolite blend.
16. The composition of claim 1, wherein the odor controlling agent comprises hydrogen peroxide, bacterial growth inhibitor, sodium nitrate, or benzyl alkonium chloride.
17. The composition of claim 1, further comprising an odor counteractant, disinfectant, or a preservative.
18. The composition of claim 17, wherein the odor counteractant comprises a volcanic clay or activated carbon.
19. A composition comprising: a polyacrylate superabsorbent, an odor controlling agent, and a zeolite blend; wherein the zeolite blend comprises a hydrophilic zeolite and a hydrophobic zeolite; wherein the composition further comprises activated carbon; and wherein a weight % ratio of the activated carbon to zeolite blend is in the range of 0.01:1 to 0.05:1.
20. The composition of 18, wherein the activated carbon comprises coconut shell char.
21. The composition of claim 18, wherein the activated carbon comprises a surface area of substantially 1250 m.sup.2/g.
22. The composition of claim 18, wherein the activated carbon is bound to the superabsorbent by electrostatic forces.
23. A composition comprising: a polyacrylate superabsorbent, an odor controlling agent, and a zeolite blend; wherein the zeolite blend comprises a hydrophilic zeolite and a hydrophobic zeolite; and wherein the composition further comprises a metal impregnated activated charcoal.
24. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition is housed within a water soluble film, a PVA film, a gel cap, a plastic straw or plastic wand, or a paper sachet.
25. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition is formed as a tablet or a pellet.
26. An insert adapted for malodor control in a device, wherein the insert comprises the composition of claim 1.
27. The insert of claim 26, wherein the device is an ostomy bag.
Description
(1) A specific implementation of the invention will now be described by way of example only, and with reference to the attached drawings in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20) The inventors provide a material blend configured to solidify excreted matter within an ostomy bag and to reduce odours within the ostomy bag which would otherwise be released from the bag when it is emptied by a patient. A material blend is housed within a water soluble sachet which provides a convenient means by which the liquid and odour absorbing material blend may be stored and transported prior to use within the ostomy bag. The dissolvable sachet may be used in all manner of pouches or bags designed for collecting body excretions such as ostomy, drainage bags or other applications where body fluids require thickening or gelling and odour control (neutralisation/absorption).
(21)
(22) In use, ostomy bag 100 is secured to the skin of a patient at the abdominal region, via adhesive pad 102 such that inlet opening 101 is aligned with the stoma site formed in the patient. Accordingly, excreted matter passes through the stoma and into internal chamber 105 of ostomy bag 100 via inlet opening 101.
(23) The excreted body fluid contacts insert 104 which acts to gel (partially solidify) the fluid matter and control malodours within internal chamber 105.
(24) Following solidification of the excreted matter, the contents of the ostomy bag 100 may then be emptied via the flap arrangement 103 configured to dispense liquid and/or solid from internal chamber 105. Flap 103 may comprise any conventional tap or flap design configured to allow liquid and/or solid matter to be released from internal chamber 105. Following emptying of the bag, a new insert may then be inserted into internal chamber 105 via the flap 103 such that a user is not required to detach bag 100 from positioning around the stoma.
(25) Referring to
(26) Referring to
(27) According to one embodiment, the stoma bag insert 104 comprises a sodium polyacrylate superabsorbent 300. The water soluble sachet comprises sodium carboxy methyl cellulose and wood pulp comprising a thickness in a range 0.07 mm to 0.09 mm. The zeolite comprises a zeolite blend having a hydrophilic zeolite component and a hydrophobic zeolite component. The water soluble sachet comprises 2 g of sodium polyacrylate and 250 mg of zeolite.
(28) According to a further specific embodiment, the insert 104 comprises sodium polyacrylate superabsorbent 300, the same water soluble sachet as described above, a zeolite blend having a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic component and powdered activated carbon.
(29) Experimental Investigation
(30) The effect of three odour absorbing compounds and a superabsorbent polymer on the volatilisation of ethanethiol and thioacetic acid from aqueous solutions have been investigated using GC headspace techniques.
(31) It was found that all three of the odour absorbing compounds and the superabsorbent polymer are effective (to a greater or lesser degree) at reducing the volatilisation of ethanethiol and thioacetic acid from aqueous solutions at 37° C.
(32) The most effective system for reducing the volatilisation of ethanethiol and thioacetic acid from aqueous solutions at 37° C. was found to be a hydrophilic/hydrophobic zeolite blend combined with the superabsorbent polymer. This system showed around a 95% reduction of the ethanethiol peak and 100% reduction of the thioacetic acid peak.
(33) Results indicate that at 37° C. and at concentrations of above 60 mg/5 ml the zeolite blend combined with polymer has comparable effectiveness with carbon black and polymer at suppressing the volatilisation of ethanethiol and thioacetic acid from aqueous solutions.
(34) Analysis
(35) A GC headspace analysis method was developed during the course of the investigations and used to quantify the levels of the odorous thiol compounds, thioacetic acid and ethanethiol, in the headspace above aqueous samples, with and without the presence of each of the absorbing compounds. The work found that two compounds—a zeolite blend and CW90 Zn salt—gave results which were comparable to activated carbon. Both compounds have the advantage over carbon black of being opaque/white, which should enable easier examination of stoma bags containing the compounds.
(36) The report below, details further investigations conducted into the absorption properties of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic zeolites and the CW90 Zn salt at temperatures more closely resembling body temperature and in the presence of a superabsorbent polymer.
(37) Objectives
(38) To test the capabilities of the zeolites and the CW90 Zn salt to absorb H.sub.2S, thioacetic acid, ethanethiol and skatole both in pure aqueous solutions and in the presence of a superabsorbent polymer.
(39) Method
(40) A stock solution of the odorous compounds H.sub.2S, thioacetic acid, ethanethiol and skatole were made up at with 2 mg/ml in water. The samples were analysed using a Perkin Elmer XL40 gas chromatograph with a Zebron ZB-624 capillary GC column (30 m×32 mm×1.8 u) with an FID detector.
(41) No signals associated with H.sub.2S and skatole were observed using the method. H.sub.2S was not detected by the FID detector and skatole was insoluble in water and its low volatility meant that the concentration in the headspace at 40° C. was negligible.
(42) As a result, a second stock solution was prepared with 3 μl/ml thioacetic acid and 0.5 μl/ml ethanethiol in water only. 5 ml of the stock solution was then added to each of the following compounds:
(43) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Summary of the solutions prepared, detailing the odour absorbing compound employed, its quantity and the quantity of superabsorbent polymer. Mass Odour absorbing of compound Mass of superabsorbent Solution compound (mg) polymer (mg) 1 None 0 0 2 None 0 25 3 Activated Carbon 67 0 4 Activated Carbon 62 28 5 Zeolite Blend 62 0 6 Zeolite Blend 59 25 7 Zeolite Hydrophobic 60 0 8 Zeolite Hydrophobic 65 25 9 Zeolite Hydrophilic 60 0 10 Zeolite Hydrophilic 58 26 11 Cw90 Zn salt 60 0 12 Cw90 Zn salt 60 24
(44) The GC analysis set up was as follows for all samples: Injection port temperature: 140° C.; Carrier gas (H.sub.2) pressure 8 psi; Oven program: 40° C. isocratic for 5 min; Ramp to 90° C. at 10° C./min; isocratic at 90° C. for 2 min; FID detector temperature: 240° C.
(45) Headspace sampling was carried out as follows: Equilibrium time 7 minutes with shaking; Pressurisation 0.5 minutes; Injection 0.1 minutes; Withdrawal 0.1 minutes; Oven temperature 37° C.; Needle 60° C.; Transfer line 60° C.
Blank Results (Solutions 1+2)
(46) Analysis of aqueous solution containing 3 μl/ml thioacetic acid and 0.5 μl/ml ethanethiol resulted in peaks at ˜2.5 minutes for ethanethiol and 5.75 minutes for thioacetic acid, the results are shown in
(47) The same aqueous solution when added to 25 mg of superabsorbent polymer showed that the polymer itself had some odour absorbing qualities without the presence of any odour absorbing compounds, as shown in
(48) Summary of Results
(49) TABLE-US-00002 Percentage decrease of Percentage decrease of ethanethiol thioacetic Solution Compounds peak (%) acid peak (%) 3 Carbon 74 90 4 Carbon + Polymer 91 100 5 Zeolite Blend 89 100 6 Zeolite Blend + Polymer 95 100 7 Zeolite Hydrophilic 32 100 8 Zeolite Hydrophilic + 32 100 9 Zeolite Hydrophobic 80 50 10 Zeolite Hydrophobic + 96 100 11 Cw90 Zn salt 32 50 12 Cw90 Zn salt + Polymer 40 100
Effect of Concentration
(50) The effect of the concentration of the absorbing compounds and the polymer on the level of odours compound absorption were also investigated. 5 ml of the stock solution containing ethanethiol and thioacetic acid was added to vials containing masses of odour absorbing compounds ranging from ˜20 mg to ˜150 mg. The results are displayed in the tables below. Note: all experiments on the absorbing compounds were performed in aqueous solutions without polymer.
(51) Activated Carbon:
(52) TABLE-US-00003 Mass of compound Percentage decrease of Percentage decrease of (mg) ethanethiol peak thioacetic acid peak 27 87 100 39 87 100 63 93 100 103 100 100
(53) Zeolite Blend:
(54) TABLE-US-00004 Mass of compound Percentage decrease of Percentage decrease of (mg) ethanethiol peak thioacetic acid peak 22 53 100 40 80 100 59 91 100 101 98 100
(55) Zeolite Hydrophobic:
(56) TABLE-US-00005 Mass of compound Percentage decrease of Percentage decrease of (mg) ethanethiol peak thioacetic acid peak 19 53 50 43 77 75 60 83 75 102 95 95
(57) Zeolite Hydrophilic:
(58) TABLE-US-00006 Mass of compound Percentage decrease of Percentage decrease of (mg) ethanethiol peak thioacetic acid peak 19 7 100 40 20 100 60 20 100 100 20 100
(59) Cw 90Zn salt:
(60) TABLE-US-00007 Mass of compound Percentage decrease of Percentage decrease of (mg) ethanethiol peak thioacetic acid peak 26 0 50 50 20 50 76 73 90 112 89 95
(61) Superabsorbent gel:
(62) TABLE-US-00008 Mass of compound Percentage decrease of Percentage decrease of (mg) ethanethiol peak thioacetic acid peak 32 13 100 55 27 100 80 40 100 150 33 100
(63) The performance of the absorbing compounds identified as solutions 3 to 12 are detailed in
(64) A summary of the percentage decrease of the ethanethiol and thioacetic acid peaks for solutions 1 to 12, based on the gas chromatography results of
CONCLUSIONS
(65) No signals associated with H.sub.2S or skatole were observed using the GC headspace method. H.sub.2S was not detected by the FID detector and skatole was insoluble in water and its low volatility meant that the concentration in the headspace at 40° C. was negligible.
(66) All the odour absorbing compounds reduced the peak height of ethanethiol and thioacetic acid compared to the blank, solution 1. The polymer also reduced the peak heights of ethanethiol by 20% and thioacetic acid by 90%.
(67) Almost all the odour absorbing compounds showed enhanced peak reduction of ethanethiol and thioacetic acid with the presence of the superabsorbent polymer, the hydrophilic zeolite was the only compound which showed little to no enhancement of ethanethiol absorption by addition of polymer.
(68) The present results indicate that the hydrophobic zeolite is more effective at reducing the ethanethiol peak than the thioacetic acid peak, whilst the hydrophilic zeolite shows the opposite effect and is much less effective at reducing ethanethiol, but effective at reducing the thioacetic acid peak.
(69) The Zeolite blend containing both hydrophilic and hydrophobic forms (solution 5) absorbed more ethanethiol and thioacetic acid than the individual zeolites themselves.
(70) The Zeolite blend (solution 6) combined with the superabsorbent polymer appears to be the most effective system for reducing the volatilisation of ethanethiol and thioacetic acid from aqueous solutions at 37° C. The solution showed ˜95% reduction of the ethanethiol peak and 100% reduction of the thioacetic acid peak. The blend was successful because the hydrophobic zeolite had a greater effect on the absorption of ethanethiol and the hydrophilic zeolite a greater effect on the absorption of thioacetic acid.
(71) At ˜37° C. the performances of the zeolite blend and activated carbon appear to be roughly comparable. Activated carbon is more effective at the lower concentrations (˜20 mg in 5 ml) at reducing the volatilisation of ethanethiol and thioacetic acid, but at higher concentrations (˜60-100 mg) the zeolite blend performs equally as well.
(72) Cw 90 Zn salt was the least effective of the three compounds tested and showed only minor reductions on the levels of ethanethiol. Reductions in the thioacetic acid peak height were observed. At higher concentrations, in aqueous solutions, the Cw 90 Zn salt performs relatively well suppressing both the ethanethiol and thioacetic acid peaks. However, in the presence of the polymer it performed less well, possibly indicating an inhibiting effect of the polymer on the salt's performance.
(73) Generally, increasing the concentration of the odour absorbing compound decreased the volatilisation of ethanethiol and thioacetic acid. The exception was the hydrophilic zeolite, which reached a plateau of ethanethiol reduction at ˜20%.