Hybrid planar-mixed heterojunction for organic photovoltaics

Abstract

Disclosed herein are organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices comprising two electrodes in superposed relation; a mixed photoactive layer located between the two electrodes, wherein the mixed photoactive layer comprises at least one donor material having a HOMO energy and at least one acceptor material having a LUMO energy, wherein the at least one donor material and the at least one acceptor material form a mixed donor-acceptor heterojunction; a photoactive layer adjacent to and interfacing with the mixed photoactive layer, wherein the photoactive layer comprises a material having a LUMO energy within 0.3 eV of the LUMO energy of the at least one acceptor material or a HOMO energy within 0.3 eV of the HOMO energy of the at least one donor material; and a buffer layer adjacent to and interfacing with the mixed photoactive layer.

Claims

1. An organic photosensitive optoelectronic device comprising: two electrodes in superposed relation; a mixed photoactive layer located between the two electrodes, wherein the mixed photoactive layer is a single layer comprising a mixture of at least one donor material having a highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy and at least one acceptor material having a lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy, wherein the at least one donor material and the at least one acceptor material form a mixed donor-acceptor heterojunction; a photoactive layer adjacent to and interfacing with the mixed photoactive layer, wherein the photoactive layer is a single layer comprising a material having a LUMO energy within 0.3 eV of the LUMO energy of the at least one acceptor material; and a buffer layer adjacent to and interfacing with the mixed photoactive layer, wherein the buffer layer comprises a metal oxide; wherein the mixed photoactive layer comprises the at least one donor material and the at least one acceptor material at a donor:acceptor ratio ranging from 1:4 to 1:25; and wherein the photoactive layer has a total thickness less than 10 nm.

2. The device of claim 1, wherein the photoactive layer comprises a material having a LUMO energy within 0.1 eV of the LUMO energy of the at least one acceptor material.

3. The device of claim 1, wherein the material having a LUMO energy within 0.3 eV of the LUMO energy of the at least one acceptor material is the same material as the at least one acceptor material.

4. The device of claim 1, wherein the at least one acceptor material comprises a fullerene or derivative thereof.

5. The device of claim 4, wherein the at least one donor material comprises tetraphenyldibenzoperiflanthene (DBP).

6. The device of claim 5, wherein the donor:acceptor ratio is about 1:8.

7. The device of claim 4, wherein the photoactive layer has a total thickness of about 9 nm.

8. The device of claim 1, wherein the donor:acceptor ratio ranges from 1:6 to 1:10.

9. The device of claim 1, wherein the buffer layer quenches excitons at the interface between the buffer layer and the mixed photoactive layer.

Description

(1) The accompanying figures are incorporated in, and constitute a part of this specification.

(2) FIG. 1 shows a schematic of an exemplary device according to the present disclosure.

(3) FIG. 2 shows the absorption spectra of DBP, C.sub.70 and a 1:8 DBP:C.sub.70 mixture. Inset: Molecular structural formulae of DBP (left), C.sub.70 (right)

(4) FIG. 3(a) shows the photoluminescence (PL) excitation spectra of DBP and C.sub.70 films with Mo0.sub.3, exciton blocking (BPhen) and quenching (C.sub.60, NPD) layers. FIG. 3(b) shows the spatial distribution of absorbed optical power in the mixed-HJ and PM-HJ ceils at a wavelength of λ=500 nm.

(5) FIG. 4(a) shows the external quantum efficiency (EQE), and FIG. 4(b) shows the current density vs. voltage (J-V) characteristics under simulated AM1.5 G, one sun illumination as a function of ratio between DBP:C.sub.70 (I:x).

(6) FIG. 5 shows the spectrally-corrected current density vs. voltage (J-V) characteristics under simulated AM1.5 G, one sun illumination as a function of the thickness (x) of the neat C.sub.70 cap layer.

(7) FIG. 6 shows the absorption efficiency (dashed lines), external quantum efficiency (triangles), and internal quantum efficiency ((IQE), squares) spectra for the mixed-HJ and PM-HJ OPV cells.

(8) As used herein, the term “organic” includes polymeric materials as well as small molecule organic materials that may be used to fabricate organic photosensitive devices. “Small molecule” refers to any organic material that is not a polymer, and “small molecules” may actually be quite large. Small molecules may include repeat units in some circumstances. For example, using a long chain alkyl group as a substituent does not remove a molecule from the “small molecule” class. Small molecules may also be incorporated into polymers, for example as a pendent group on a polymer backbone or as a part of the backbone.

(9) The terms “electrode” and “contact” are used herein to refer to a layer that provides a medium for delivering photo-generated current to an external circuit or providing a bias current or voltage to the device. That is, an electrode, or contact, provides the interface between the active regions of an organic photosensitive optoelectronic device and a wire, lead, trace or other means for transporting the charge carriers to or from the external circuit. Anodes and cathodes are examples. U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,777, incorporated herein by reference for its disclosure of electrodes, provides examples of electrodes, or contacts, which may be used in a photosensitive optoelectronic device. In a photosensitive optoelectronic device, it may be desirable to allow the maximum amount of ambient electromagnetic radiation from the device exterior to be admitted to the photoconductive active interior region. That is, the electromagnetic radiation must reach a photoconductive layer(s), where it can be converted to electricity by photoconductive absorption. This often dictates that at least one of the electrical contacts should be minimally absorbing and minimally reflecting of the incident electromagnetic radiation. In some cases, such a contact should be transparent or at least semi-transparent. An electrode is said to be “transparent” when it permits at least 50% of the ambient electromagnetic radiation in relevant wavelengths to be transmitted through it. An electrode is said to be “semi-transparent” when it permits some, but less that 50% transmission of ambient electromagnetic radiation in relevant wavelengths. The opposing electrode may be a reflective material so that light which has passed through the cell without being absorbed is reflected back through the cell.

(10) As used and depicted herein, a “layer” refers to a member or component of a photosensitive device whose primary dimension is X-Y, i.e., along its length and width. It should be understood that the term layer is not necessarily limited to single layers or sheets of materials. In addition, it should be understood that the surfaces of certain layers, including the interface(s) of such layers with other material(s) or layers(s), may be imperfect, wherein said surfaces represent an interpenetrating, entangled or convoluted network with other material(s) or layer(s). Similarly, it should also be understood that a layer may be discontinuous, such that the continuity of said layer along the X-Y dimension may be disturbed or otherwise interrupted by other layer(s) or material(s).

(11) As used herein, a “photoactive region” refers to a region of the device that absorbs electromagnetic radiation to generate excitons. Similarly, a layer is “photoactive” if it absorbs electromagnetic radiation to generate excitons. The excitons may dissociate into an electron and a hole in order to generate an electrical current.

(12) In the context of the organic materials of the present disclosure, the terms “donor” and “acceptor” refer to the relative positions of the HOMO and LUMO energy levels of two contacting but different organic materials. If the LUMO energy level of one material in contact with another is lower, then that material is an acceptor. Otherwise it is a donor. It is energetically favorable, in the absence of an external bias, for electrons at a donor-acceptor junction to move into the acceptor material, and for holes to move into the donor material.

(13) Certain embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices comprising: two electrodes in superposed relation; a mixed photoactive layer located between the two electrodes, wherein the mixed photoactive layer comprises at least one donor material having a HOMO energy and at least one acceptor material having a LUMO energy, wherein the at least one donor material and the at least one acceptor material form a mixed donor-acceptor heterojunction; a photoactive layer adjacent to and interfacing with the mixed photoactive layer, wherein the photoactive layer comprises a material having a LUMO energy within 0.3 eV of the LUMO energy of the at least one acceptor material or a HOMO energy within 0.3 eV of the HOMO energy of the at least one donor material; and a buffer layer adjacent to and interfacing with the mixed photoactive layer.

(14) A non-limiting device schematic in accordance with the present disclosure is shown in FIG. 1. In some embodiments, the device does not comprise the buffer layer. In such embodiments, the mixed photoactive layer may be adjacent to and may interface with an electrode.

(15) One of the electrodes of the present disclosure may be an anode, and the other electrode a cathode. It should be understood that the electrodes should be optimized to receive and transport the desired carrier (holes or electrons). The term “cathode” is used herein such that in a non-stacked PV device or a single unit of a stacked PV device under ambient irradiation and connected with a resistive load and with no externally applied voltage, e.g., a PV device, electrons move to the cathode from the photo-conducting material. Similarly, the term “anode” is used herein such that in a PV device under illumination, holes move to the anode from the photoconducting material, which is equivalent to electrons moving in the opposite manner.

(16) The mixed photoactive layer of the present disclosure comprises at least one donor material and at least one acceptor material. Examples of suitable donor materials include but are not limited to phthalocyanines, such as copper phthalocyanine(CuPc), chloroaluminium phthalocyanine (ClAlPc), tin phthalocyanine (SnPc), zinc phthalocyanine (ZnPc), and other modified phthalocyanines, subphthalocyanines, such as boron subphthalocyanine (SubPc), naphthalocyanines, merocyanine dyes, boron-dipyrromethene (BODIPY) dyes, thiophenes, such as poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT), low band-gap polymers, polyacenes, such as pentacene and tetracene, diindenoperylene (DIP), squaraine (SQ) dyes, and tetraphenyldibenzoperiflanthene (DBP). Other organic donor materials are contemplated by the present disclosure.

(17) Examples of squaraine donor materials include but are not limited to 2,4-bis[4-(N,N-dipropylamino)-2,6-dihydroxyphenyl]squaraine, 2,4-bis[4-(N,Ndiisobutylamino)-2,6-dihydroxyphenyl]squaraine, 2,4-bis[4-(N,N-diphenylamino)-2,6-dihydroxyphenyl]squaraine (DPSQ) and salts thereof. Additional examples of suitable squaraine materials are disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2012/0248419, which is incorporated herein by reference for its disclosure of squaraine materials.

(18) Examples of suitable acceptor materials for the present disclosure include but are not limited to polymeric or non-polymeric perylenes, polymeric or non-polymeric naphthalenes, and polymeric or non-polymeric fullerenes and fullerene derivatives (e.g., PCBMs, ICBA, ICMA, etc.). Non-limiting mention is made to those chosen from C.sub.60, C.sub.70, C.sub.76, C.sub.82, C.sub.84, or derivatives thereof such as Phenyl-C.sub.61-Butyric-Acid-Methyl Ester ([60]PCBM), Phenyl-C.sub.71-Butyric-Acid-Methyl Ester ([70]PCBM), or Thienyl-C.sub.61-Butyric-Acid-Methyl Ester ([60]ThCBM), and other acceptors such as 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic-bisbenzimidazole (PTCBI), hexadecafluorophthalocyanine (F.sub.16CuPc), and derivatives thereof. Other organic acceptor materials are contemplated by the present disclosure.

(19) In some embodiments, the at least one donor material is present in the mixed photoactive layer in an amount less than the at least one acceptor material. In certain embodiments, the mixed photoactive layer comprises the at least one donor material and the at least one acceptor material at a donor:acceptor ratio ranging from 1:1 to 1:50, such as, for example, from 1:2 to 1:50, from 1:3 to 1:35, from 1:4 to 1:25, from 1:4 to 1:20, from 1:4 to 1:16, from 1:5 to 1:15, or from 1:6 to 1:10. In certain embodiments, the mixed photoactive layer comprises the at least one donor material and the at least one acceptor material at a donor:acceptor ratio of 1:8.

(20) In some embodiments, the at least one acceptor material is present in the mixed photoactive layer in an amount less than the at least one donor material. In certain embodiments, the mixed photoactive layer comprises the at least one acceptor material and the at least one donor material at an acceptor:donor ratio ranging from 1:1 to 1:50, such as, for example, from 1:2 to 1:50, from 1:3 to 1:35, from 1:4 to 1:25, from 1:4 to 1:20, from 1:4 to 1:16, from 1:5 to 1:15, or from 1:6 to 1:10.

(21) As shown in FIG. 1, a photoactive layer is adjacent to and interfaces with the mixed photoactive layer. The photoactive layer may comprise a material having a LUMO energy within 0.3 eV, within 0.2 eV, within 0.1 eV, or within 0.05 eV of the LUMO energy of the at least one acceptor material, or the photoactive layer may comprise a material having a HOMO energy within 0.3 eV, within 0.2 eV, within 0.1 eV, or within 0.05 eV of the HOMO energy of the at least one donor material. In some embodiments, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or at least 99.9% of material comprising the photoactive layer is the material having a LUMO energy within 0.3 eV, within 0.2 eV, within 0.1 eV, or within 0.05 eV of the LUMO energy of the at least one acceptor material, or a HOMO energy within 0.3 eV, within 0.2 eV, within 0.1 eV, or within 0.05 eV of the HOMO energy of the at least one donor material. In certain embodiments, the material having a LUMO energy within 0.3 eV, within 0.2 eV, within 0.1 eV, or within 0.05 eV of the LUMO energy of the at least one acceptor material is the same material as the at least one acceptor material. In certain embodiments, the material having a HOMO energy within 0.3 eV, within 0.2 eV, within 0.1 eV, or within 0.05 eV of the HOMO energy of the at least one donor material photoactive layer is the same material as the at least one donor material. In some embodiments, the photoactive layer has a thickness less than 50 nm, less than 40 nm, less than 30 nm, less than 25 nm, less than 20 nm, less than 15 nm, less than 10 nm, less than 8 nm, less than 5 nm, less than 3 nm, or less than 1 nm.

(22) The photoactive layer of the present disclosure may generate excitons while placing the mixed photoactive layer in an improved optical position in the layer stack, i.e., it may act as an optical spacer. Such an optical spacer can redistribute the optical power inside the device, which in some embodiments can significantly improve the performance of the device. For example, in embodiments where excitons can be quenched without dissociation at an interface between the mixed photoactive layer and the buffer layer, the photoactive layer can redistribute the optical power away from such quenching interface, allowing a greater percentage of excitons to dissociate in the mixed photoactive layer.

(23) The buffer layer may comprise materials known in the art. The buffer layer may be selected so as not to inhibit the transport of a desired carrier to an electrode. In some embodiments, the buffer layer is an electron or hole transport material. In some embodiments, the buffer layer is an exciton-blocking electron or exciton-blocking hole transport material. In some embodiments, the buffer layer is an organic material. In some embodiments, the buffer layer is a metal oxide. In some embodiments, the buffer layer is a conductive polymer. Examples of buffer materials include but are not limited to MoO.sub.3, V.sub.2O.sub.5, WO.sub.3, CrO.sub.3, Co.sub.3O.sub.4, NiO, ZnO, TiO.sub.2, polyanaline (PANI), poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), and poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT-PSS). In some embodiments, the buffer layer is a self-assembled monolayer.

(24) In some embodiments, the buffer layer quenches excitons at its interface with the mixed photoactive layer.

(25) Also disclosed herein are organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices comprising: two electrodes in superposed relation; a mixed photoactive layer located between the two electrodes, wherein the mixed photoactive layer comprises at least one donor material having a HOMO energy and at least one acceptor material having a LUMO energy, wherein the at least one donor material and the at least one acceptor material form a mixed donor-acceptor heterojunction; a photoactive layer adjacent to and interfacing with the mixed photoactive layer, wherein the photoactive layer comprises a material having a LUMO energy within 0.3 eV of the LUMO energy of the at least one acceptor material or a HOMO energy within 0.3 eV of the HOMO energy of the at least one donor material, and wherein the mixed photoactive layer comprises the at least one donor material and the at least one acceptor material at a donor:acceptor ratio ranging from 1:1 to 1:50, such as, for example, from 1:2 to 1:50, from 1:3 to 1:35, from 1:4 to 1:25, from 1:4 to 1:20, from 1:4 to 1:16, from 1:5 to 1:15, or from 1:6 to 1:10. In some embodiments, the device optionally includes the buffer layer adjacent to and interfacing with the mixed photoactive layer.

(26) Also disclosed herein are organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices comprising: two electrodes in superposed relation; a mixed photoactive layer located between the two electrodes, wherein the mixed photoactive layer comprises at least one donor material having a HOMO energy and at least one acceptor material having a LUMO energy, wherein the at least one donor material and the at least one acceptor material form a mixed donor-acceptor heterojunction; a photoactive layer adjacent to and interfacing with the mixed photoactive layer, wherein the photoactive layer comprises a material having a LUMO energy within 0.3 eV of the LUMO energy of the at least one acceptor material or a HOMO energy within 0.3 eV of the HOMO energy of the at least one donor material, and wherein the photoactive layer has a thickness less than 50 nm, less than 40 nm, less than 30 nm, less than 25 nm, less than 20 nm, less than 15 nm, less than 10 nm, less than 8 nm, less than 5 nm, less than 3 nm, or less than 1 nm. In some embodiments, the device optionally includes the buffer layer adjacent to and interfacing with the mixed photoactive layer.

(27) As shown in FIG. 1, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, the photoactive layer is adjacent to and interfaces with a horizontal plane of the mixed photoactive layer. In some embodiments, the buffer layer is adjacent to and interfaces with an opposing horizontal plane of the mixed photoactive layer.

(28) Organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices of the present disclosure may further comprise additional layers as known in the art for such devices. For example, devices may further comprise charge carrier transport layers and/or buffers layers such as one or more blocking layers, such as an exciton blocking layer (EBL). In some embodiments, one or more blocking layers are located between an electrode and the photoactive layer. In some embodiments, one or more blocking layers are located between an electrode and the mixed layer, or in certain embodiments, between the an electrode and the buffer layer. With regard to materials that may be used as an exciton blocking layer, non-limiting mention is made to those chosen from bathocuproine (BCP), bathophenanthroline (BPhen), 1,4,5,8-Naphthalene-tetracarboxylic-dianhydride (NTCDA), 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylicbis-benzimidazole (PTCBI), 1,3,5-tris(N-phenylbenzimidazol-2-yl)benzene (TPBi), tris(acetylacetonato) ruthenium(III) (Ru(acac)3), and aluminum(III)phenolate (Alq2 OPH), N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis-alpha-naphthylbenzidine (NPD), aluminum tris(8-hydroxyquinoline) (Alq3), and carbazole biphenyl (CBP). Examples of blocking layers are described in U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2012/0235125 and 2011/0012091 and in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,230,269 and 6,451,415, which are incorporated herein by reference for their disclosure of blocking layers.

(29) In addition, the devices may further comprise at least one smoothing layer. A smoothing layer may be located, for example, between a photoactive region and either or both of the electrodes. A film comprising 3,4 polyethylenedioxythiophene:polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) is an example of a smoothing layer.

(30) The organic photosensitive optoelectronic devices of the present disclosure may exist as a tandem device comprising two or more subcells. A subcell, as used herein, means a component of the device which comprises at least one donor-acceptor heterojunction. When a subcell is used individually as a photosensitive optoelectronic device, it typically includes a complete set of electrodes. A tandem device may comprise charge transfer material, electrodes, or charge recombination material or a tunnel junction between the tandem donor-acceptor heterojunctions. In some tandem configurations, it is possible for adjacent subcells to utilize common, i.e., shared, electrode, charge transfer region or charge recombination zone. In other cases, adjacent subcells do not share common electrodes or charge transfer regions. The subcells may be electrically connected in parallel or in series.

(31) In some embodiments, the charge transfer layer or charge recombination layer may be chosen from Al, Ag, Au, MoO.sub.3, Li, LiF, Sn, Ti, WO3, indium tin oxide (ITO), tin oxide (TO), gallium indium tin oxide (GITO), zinc oxide (ZO), or zinc indium tin oxide (ZITO). In another embodiment, the charge transfer layer or charge recombination layer may be comprised of metal nanoclusters, nanoparticles, or nanorods.

(32) The devices of the present disclosure may be, for example, photodetectors, photoconductors, or photovoltaic devices, such as solar cells.

(33) Layers and materials may be deposited using techniques known in the art. For example, the layers and materials described herein can be deposited or co-deposited from a solution, vapor, or a combination of both. In some embodiments, organic materials or organic layers can be deposited or co-deposited via solution processing, such as by one or more techniques chosen from spin-coating, spin-casting, spray coating, dip coating, doctor-blading, inkjet printing, or transfer printing.

(34) In other embodiments, organic materials may be deposited or co-deposited using vacuum evaporation, such as vacuum thermal evaporation, organic vapor phase deposition, or organic vapor-jet printing.

(35) It should be understood that embodiments described herein may be used in connection with a wide variety of structures. Functional organic photovoltaic devices may be achieved by combining the various layers described in different ways, or layers may be omitted entirely, based on design, performance, and cost factors. Additional layers not specifically described may also be included. Materials other than those specifically described may be used. The names given to the various layers herein are not intended to be strictly limiting.

(36) Other than in the examples, or where otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, reaction conditions, analytical measurements and so forth, used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present disclosure. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should be construed in light of the number of significant digits and ordinary rounding approaches.

(37) Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the disclosure are approximations, unless otherwise indicated the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.

(38) The devices and methods described herein will be further described by the following non-limiting examples, which are intended to be purely exemplary.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Photoluminescence Measurements of DBP and C.SUB.70.Films

(39) To investigate the influence of MoO.sub.3 on exciton dissociation, and therefore OPV efficiency, the photoluminescence (PL) excitation spectra of 60 nm-thick DBP and C.sub.70 films in contact with an 8 nm-thick MoO.sub.3 layer on quartz were measured. For comparison, 8 nm-thick bathophenanthorline (BPhen) layers were used as exciton blocking layers for both DBP and C.sub.70, while C.sub.60 and N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(I-naphthyl)-1-1′biphenvl-4,4′diamine (NPD) were employed as exciton quenching layers for DBP and C.sub.70, respectively. All of these films were capped with a 10 nm-thick BPhen exciton blocking layer. The photoluminescence spectra of DBP and C.sub.70 films photoluminescence were measured with illumination through the glass substrate and excited at wavelengths of λ=530 nm and 460 nm, respectively.

(40) The results of these measurements are depicted in FIG. 3(a). The MoO.sub.3/DBP sample had a PL intensity comparable to that of a film employing a quenching C.sub.60/DBP interface. Similarly, the MoO.sub.3/C.sub.70 interface had slightly higher PL intensity than that of the quenching NPD/C.sub.70 sample. In both cases, their PL intensities were significantly reduced compared to those employing the blocking BPhen/C.sub.70 and BPhen/DBP interfaces. These results indicate that MoO.sub.3 quenches rather than blocks excitons, as previously expected.

Example 2

Production of OPV Cells

(41) OPV cells were grown on glass substrates coated with 100 nm-thick ITO with a sheet resistance of 15Ω/□. Prior to thin film deposition, substrates were cleaned in detergent, de-ionized water and a sequence of organic solvents, followed by exposure to ultraviolet (UV)-ozone for 10 min. The substrates were then transferred into a high vacuum chamber with a base pressure of 10.sup.−7 torr.

(42) MoO.sub.3, C.sub.70 and BPhen layers were deposited at a rate of 0.5 Å/sec, DBP and C.sub.70 were co-deposited using a DBP deposition rate of 0.2 Å/sec, while the deposition rate of C.sub.70 was adjusted to achieve the desired volume ratio. A shadow mask with an array of 1 mm-diameter circular openings was used to pattern the 1000 Å-thick Al cathode, thereby defining the cell area.

(43) The substrates were directly transferred into a glove box filled with ultrahigh purity N.sub.2 where current density-voltage (J-V) in the dark and under simulated AM 1.5 G solar irradiation, and the EQE were measured. A National Renewable Energy Laboratory traceable Si reference cell was used to determine optical power. The EQE was measured using monochromated light from a Xe-lamp and chopped at 200 Hz, referenced to a NREL-traceable Si detector. The short circuit current, J.sub.sc1, was corrected for spectral mismatch.

(44) Tetraphenyldibenzoperiflanthene (DBP) was used as the donor material, and C.sub.70 was used as the acceptor material. DBP has a high absorption coefficient (see FIG. 2), a high hole mobility, .sub.˜10.sup.−4 cm.sup.2/(V.Math.s), a highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy of −5.5 eV, and an exciton diffusion length of 16±1 nm measured by spectrally resolved luminescence quenching. C.sub.70 has a broad absorption spectrum between λ=350 nm to 700 nm. The resulting blend of DBP and C.sub.70 can strongly absorbed between λ=350 nm to 700 nm.

(45) Vacuum thermally evaporated MoO.sub.3 was used as an anode buffer layer due to its large work function (which improves the hole collection efficiency at the anode), high transmittance and low series resistance.

(46) DBP to C.sub.70 in the PM-HJ structure was optimized, such that the EQE integrated over the solar spectrum was maximized for a 1:8 DBP:C.sub.70 mixture (see FIG. 4(a)). The open circuit voltage (V.sub.OC) increased monotonically with decreasing DBP concentration as shown in FIG. 4(b), which was likely due to a reduced polaron-pair recombination rate. The fill factor increased with decreasing DBP concentration, reaching a maximum of FF=56±0.01 at a 1:8 ratio, and remained almost unchanged as the DBP concentration was further reduced in this partially mixed, heterogenous region. This was likely due to balanced electron and hole mobilities in the mixed photoactive layer domains, which can reduce bimolecular recombination.

(47) The J-V characteristics of the cells with different C.sub.70 cap thicknesses under AM1.5 G, 1 sun intensity simulated solar illumination are shown in FIG. 5, with device performance characteristics summarized in Table I. All cells had V.sub.OC=0.91±0.01 V, and a fill factor of FF=0.56±0.01. The mixed-HJ cell had J.sub.SC=10.7±0.2 mA/cm.sup.2, resulting in a power conversion efficiency of PCE=5.7±0.1%. The addition of a C.sub.70 layer (x=9 nm) led to an increase in J.sub.SC to 12.3±0.3 mA/cm.sup.2, resulting in PCE=6.4±0.3%,

(48) As the C.sub.70 thickness increased to x=9 nm, the EQE of the PM-HJ cell increased by up to 10% between λ=400 nm and 700 nm compared to the mixed-HJ cell (see FIG. 6). This, in turn, led to a 15% increase in J.sub.SC. As x was increased further to 11 nm, J.sub.SC decreased to 12.0±0.2 mA/cm.sup.2. The EQE of the PM-HJ cell with a 9 nm-thick C.sub.70 layer was >70% between λ=450 nm and 550 nm, and averaged >65% within the spectral range from λ=350 nm to 650 nm, leading to J.sub.SC=12.3±0.3 mA/cm.sup.2.

(49) The internal quantum efficiency, IQE, is defined as the ratio of free carriers collected at the electrodes to photons absorbed in the photoactive layers. The transfer matrix method was used to calculate the absorption efficiency, η.sub.A, to further understand the origin of improvement in EQE in the PM-HJ cell. Based on the optical simulation, the mixed-HJ and PM-HJ cells showed similar absorption spectra with η.sub.A>75% between λ=400 nm and 650 nm, as shown in FIG. 6. The PM-HJ cell had IQE>90% within the spectral range of λ=450 nm and 550 nm, while the IQE of the mixed-HJ cell was only ˜80% in the same spectral region (FIG. 6). The addition of the C.sub.70 layer in the PM-HJ cell redistributed the optical field inside the photoactive layer, as shown in FIG. 3(b), leading to increased exciton generation and dissociation in the cell photoactive region and reduced exciton quenching at the MoO.sub.3/organic interface.

(50) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Spectral Cell PCE (%) mis- Structure I.sub.SC 1 sun, match (x nm) V.sub.OC (V) (mA/cm.sup.3) FF AM1.5G factor mixed-HJ (0) 0.90 (±0.01) 10.7 (±0.2) 0.57 5.2 (±0.2) 1.03 (±0.02) PM-HJ (5) 0.91 (±0.01) 11.9 (±0.2) 0.56 6.1 (±0.2) 1.04 (±0.01) PM-HJ (7) 0.91 (±0.01) 12.1 (±0.2) 0.56 6.2 (±0.2) 1.03 (±0.01) PM-HJ (9) 0.91 (±0.01) 12.3 (±0.3) 0.56 6.4 (±0.3) 1.03 (±0.01) PM-HJ (11) 0.91 (±0.01) 12.0 (±0.2) 0.56 6.2 (±0.2) 1.04 (±0.01)