TAXODIONE FOR ITS USE FOR PROTECTING MUSCLE AND MEAT FROM OXIDATION

Abstract

The present invention relates to the abietane diterpene taxodione and to rosemary stem extract containing taxodione for their use in treating a muscle wasting diseases and/or disorders; it also relates to the use of taxodione as natural meat preserver.

Claims

1. A method for preventing and/or decreasing oxidation in muscle in a subject in need thereof, comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of taxodione or a rosemary stem extract.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method prevents and/or decreases protein oxidative degradation in muscle and/or prevents and/or decreases accumulation of pro-oxidant molecules in muscle.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method prevents and/or treats loss of muscle mass and/or muscle fatigue and/or muscle wasting diseases, wherein said loss of muscle mass, muscle fatigue and muscle wasting diseases are associated with oxidative stress.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said rosemary stem extract comprises at least 1% w/w of taxodione.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said rosemary stem extract is obtained by preparing a dry powder of rosemary stem; macerating said dry powder in an organic or hydroalcoholic solvent for at least 5 days; and recovering the liquid phase and evaporating the solvent; wherein said solvent is selected amongst an alcohol, a hydrocarbon, a halogenated hydrocarbon, acetone, ethyl acetate, water or a mixture thereof.

6. A method of preparing a food product containing proteins and/or lipids and having an improved shelf-life, comprising contacting the food product with an effective amount of taxodione or a rosemary stem extract.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein said food product containing proteins is selected amongst food product containing mea non-heat treated processed meat, heat-treated processed meat, processed fish and fishery products, processed eggs and egg products, and dehydrated milk.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein said food product containing lipids is selected amongst seasoning, condiments, mustard, soups and broth sauces, fats and oils essentially free from water.

9. The method of claim 6 wherein said food product containing proteins and/or lipids is a food product containing meat selected in the group consisting of fresh meat and delicatessen.

10. (canceled)

11. A method of improving livestock meat and meat-derived food product quality, comprising adding taxodione or an extract of rosemary stem to livestock feed.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the livestock feed reduces degradation and/or reduces lipid peroxidation and/or improves color, flavor and/or texture stabilities of the meat or of the meat-derived food products.

13. (canceled)

14. The method of claim 5, wherein obtaining a rosemary stem extract further comprises applying an ultrasonic extraction.

15. The method of claim 5, wherein obtaining a rosemary stem extract comprises macerating said dry powder in an organic or hydroalcoholic solvent for at least 7 days.

16. A process of preparing a rosemary stem extract comprising at least 1% w/w of taxodione, comprising: preparing a dry powder of rosemary stem; macerating said dry powder in an organic or hydroalcoolic solvent for at least 5 days; and recovering the liquid phase and evaporating the solvent, wherein said solvent is selected amongst an alcohol, a hydrocarbon, a halogenated hydrocarbon, acetone, ethyl acetate, water or a mixture thereof.

17. The process of claim 16, wherein obtaining a rosemary stem extract further comprises applying an ultrasonic extraction.

18. A rosemary stem extract comprising at least 1% w/w of taxodione.

19. The rosemary stem extract of claim 18, wherein the extract comprises at least 3% w/w of taxodione.

Description

[0047] The invention can be further illustrated by the following examples.

[0048] FIG. 1: Rosemary stem extract protects human myoblasts from induced oxidative stress.

[0049] Cell death quantification (percentage of all cells) in human myoblasts that were incubated with (A) Rosmarinus officinalis whole extracts (RW) or tempol (synthetic antioxidant; 50 μM as control) or with (B) different concentrations of Rosmarinus officinalis leaf (RL) or stem (RS) extracts prior to incubation with (A,B) 120 μM H.sub.2O.sub.2 (lethal concentration). CTRL: cells not incubated with H.sub.2O.sub.2. Cell death was quantified using the Cell Count and Viability Kit and the Muse Cell Analyzer; p<0.001 (***) and p<0.0001 (****) compared with H.sub.2O.sub.2 (A, B) (one way ANOVA).

[0050] FIG. 2: Different steps of taxodione purification from rosemary stem extract.

[0051] FIG. 3: Taxodione has a strong antioxidant activity on human muscle cells. Cell death quantification (percentage of all cells) in human myoblasts upon incubation with the (A, B) indicated concentrations of taxodione (TX) or (B) of the main bioactive compounds of rosemary, carnosic acid (CA) and carnosol (CO), prior to exposure to (A, B) 120 μM H.sub.2O.sub.2 (lethal concentration). CTRL: cells not incubated with H.sub.2O.sub.2. Cell death was quantified using the Cell Count and Viability Kit and the Muse Cell Analyzer; p<0.05 (*), p<0.01 (**) and p<0.001 (***) compared with H.sub.2O.sub.2 (A, B) (one way ANOVA).

[0052] FIG. 4: Taxodione decreases oxidative damage in human muscles cells.

[0053] Myoblasts were incubated with taxodione (TX) (0.5 μg/mL) for 24 h prior to exposure to H.sub.2O.sub.2. (A) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was quantified with the “Muse oxidative stress Kit” and Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). (B) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated γH2AX protein level; histone H1.4 was used as loading control (right panel). Quantification of the Western blot data using the Odyssey software (left panel). (C) RT-qPCR analysis showing the relative expression levels (compared with untreated control) of the CHOP gene; RPLPO was used as reference gene. (D,E) Confluent human primary myoblasts were switched to differentiation medium for 4 days. At day 2, cells were incubated with TX (0.5 μg/mL) for 24 h and then exposed to H.sub.2O.sub.2 for 24 h. (D) H.sub.2O.sub.2 toxicity was determined by quantifying lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity; (E) CellRox (ROS activity probe) was loaded in myotubes and fluorescence was quantified using a TECAN spectrophotometer; p<0.01 (**) and p<0.001 (***) compared with H.sub.2O.sub.2 (one way ANOVA).

[0054] FIG. 5: Taxodione protects mice minced meat from lipid and protein oxidation during refrigerated storage.

[0055] Minced gastrocnemius muscles from six-month-old C57BL/6 male mice were mixed with ethanol (CTRL) or BHT (0.010%, 0.005%, 0.0025% w/w minced muscle), carnosic acid (CA) (0.015%, 0.0075%, 0.00375% w/w minced muscle) or taxodione (TX) (0.015%, 0.0075%, 0.00375% w/w minced muscle) dissolved in ethanol. At day 0 and day 7 of refrigerated storage (+4° C.), (A) lipid oxidation was evaluated by TBARS quantification, and (B) protein oxidation by total thiol quantification; p<0.05 (*), p<0.01 (**), p<0.001 (***) compared with CTRL (one way ANOVA).

[0056] FIG. 6: comparison of ethanolic rosemary stem extracts (RS (EtOH)) and hydroethanolic rosemary stem extracts (RS) on lipid oxidation of mice minced meat during refrigerated storage.

[0057] FIG. 7: comparison of rosemary stem extracts (RS) and rosemary leaf extracts (RL) on lipid oxidation of mice minced meat during refrigerated storage.

[0058] FIG. 8: comparison of rosemary stem extracts (RS) and vitamin C on lipid oxidation of mice minced meat during refrigerated storage.

[0059] FIG. 9: Comparison of several taxodione enriched extracts and E392 on the peroxidation of mice meat lipids.

[0060] FIG. 10: Comparison of several taxodione enriched extracts and E392 on the peroxidation of beef meat lipids.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Materials and Methods

1. General Experimental Procedure

[0061] Flash column chromatography was performed using a Spot Liquid Chromatography Flash instrument (Armen Instrument, Saint-Ave, France) equipped with an UV/visible spectrophotometer, a quaternary pump and a fraction collector. .sup.1H NMR, .sup.13C NMR and 2D NMR spectra were recorded in the appropriate deuterated solvent on a BRUKER Avance III-600 MHz NMR spectrometer.

2. Reagent and Standards

[0062] DPPH radical (97%), cyclohexane (99.8%), chloroform (99%), dichloromethane (99.9%), deuterated chloroform (99.8%), DMSO (99.9%) and Tempol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Acetonitrile (99.9%) was purchased from Chromasolv (Seelze, Germany). Formic acid (98%), ethyl acetate (99%) and acetone (99.5%) were from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain). Trolox (98%) was purchased from Fluka Chemicals (Steinheim, Switzerland), and ethanol (99.9%) from VWR BDH Prolabo (Pennsylvania, USA). L-ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) (Sigma-Aldrich, France)

3. Plant Material

[0063] Rosmarinus officinalis was collected in the North of Montpellier (France) in February 2015. Dry stems and leaves were ground and directly extracted.

4. Extraction

[0064] 150 g of ground rosemary stems were macerated in the dark at room temperature with 900 g of absolute ethanol and 450 g of distilled water, with agitation every 24 h. After 7 days, the stem extract was filtered. Evaporation under reduced pressure to dryness yielded 12.2 g of hydroethanolic extract, named RS (Rosemary Stems). The same procedure was used for 150 g of ground leaves and allowed obtaining 69 g of hydroethanolic extract, named RL (Rosemary Leaves). The same procedure was used for 150 g of ground leaves and stems, named RW (Rosemary Whole). A 100% ethanolic extract has also been prepared with the same procedure for 150 g of ground stem; 5.3 g of extract, named RS (EtOH) has been obtained. The dry extracts were kept at −20° C. until analysis and purification.

5. Bioassay-Guided Isolation of Taxodione from the Rosemary Stem Extract

[0065] At each purification step, fractions were tested using the assays described below. The RS extract (12.2 g) was partitioned in CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2 soluble fraction and aqueous fraction. After evaporation under reduced pressure to dryness, these two fractions yielded 4.41 g of CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2 soluble extract and 7.79 g of aqueous soluble extract. The CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2 soluble extract was separated on normal-phase flash column chromatography (Merck Chimie SVF D26-5160, 15-40 μm-30 g, flow rate 6.5 mL/min, 25 mL/fraction). Elution was completed with mixtures of cyclohexane:ethyl acetate (100:0 to 0:100), and then chloroform:methanol (100:0 to 80:20 in 1% then 5% stepwise). After thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis, the first fractions eluted with 100% cyclohexane (fractions 1-69) were combined and concentrated under reduced pressure, yielding fraction F1 (370 mg). F1 was purified on LH-20 Sephadex gel (2.4×38 cm, 40 g LH-20, elution: 100% dichloromethane to 100% methanol in 50% stepwise, then 100% acetone, 3 mL/fraction). Fractions 17 to 33 eluted with 100% CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2 were combined and concentrated under reduced pressure, yielding fraction F1-2 (160 mg). F1-2 was finally purified on reverse-phase flash column chromatography (Chromabond® Flash, RS4 C18, 4.3 g, flow rate: 5 mL/min, 25 mL/fraction). Elution was completed with a mixture of acetonitrile/water (50:50 to 100:0) and gave 111 fractions. Fractions 17 to 29 eluted with acetonitrile/water (60:40) were combined (F1-2-3) to give 50 mg of pure taxodione.

6. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analysis

[0066] Chromatographic separation and detection for quantitative analysis were performed on a SpectroSYSTEM® instrument that included a P4000 pump, a SCM1000 degasser, an AS3000 automatic sampler and an UV6000LP DAD detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., San José, USA). The system was operated using the ChromQuest software, version 5.0. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an ODS Hypersyl C18 column (250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., San José, USA), with a column temperature maintained at 30° C. Fractions were eluted at a flow rate of 1 mL/min (initial back pressure of approximately 105 bar), using solvent A (water/formic acid 99.9:0.1 v/v) and solvent B (acetonitrile). The gradient used for the analysis of standards and rosemary extracts was: 0-10 min, 85% A; 10-20 min, 85-65% A; 20-25 min, 65-30% A; 25-30 min, 30% A; 30-50 min, 30-20% A; 50-60 min, 20-10% A; 60-70 min, 10-85%; 70-80 min 85% A. The UV/vis spectra were recorded in the 200-400 nm range and chromatograms were acquired at 230, 280 and 330 nm. Identification of rosmarinic acid, carnosol, carnosic acid and rosmanol in the crude extracts and fractions was based on comparison with the retention times and UV spectra of commercial standards.

7. Quantification of Taxodione by HPLC

[0067] Linearity/work range: Standard curves were generated with increasing amounts of TX corresponding to a concentration range of 0.029 to 1 mg/mL (n=3). Peak areas of taxodione were integrated and a calibration curve constructed. In regression analysis, curve fitting was deemed acceptable if the regression coefficient r was >0.99.
Limit of detection/Limit of quantification (LOD/LOQ): The LOD was defined as the sample concentration resulting in a response three times higher than the noise level. The LOQ was defined as the sample concentration resulting in a response ten times higher than the noise level.
Taxodione recovery was assessed by sample analysis at three different concentrations (0.05, 0.4 and 0.8 mg/mL). Accuracy was expressed as percent error [(mean of measured)/mean of expected]×100, while precision was the determined coefficient of variation (CV, in %).
Recovery in extract samples after addition of standard known amounts of taxodione: the RS extract was analysed by HPLC to quantify TX concentration and compared with the same extract spiked with known concentrations of pure TX. Recoveries were determined as [(mean value in the spiked extract—mean value in the not spiked extract)/(expected concentration)×100].

8. Primary Cultures of Human Myoblasts

[0068] The quadriceps muscle biopsy was from one healthy adult (AFM-BTR “Banque de tissus pour la recherche”). Myoblasts were purified from the muscle biopsy and were cultured on collagen-coated dishes in DMEM/F12 medium with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.1% Ultroser G and 1 ng/ml of human basic fibroblast growth factor (proliferation medium), as previously described (Kitzmann, Bonnieu, Duret, Vernus, Barro, Laoudj-Chenivesse, et al., 2006). For cell differentiation, confluent cells were cultured in DMEM with 4% FBS for 3-5 days (differentiation medium).

9. Cell Death and ROS Quantification

[0069] Myoblasts: Myoblasts were seeded in 35 mm collagen-coated dishes, cultured in proliferation medium, pre-incubated or not with the tested compounds for 24 h and then incubated or not with a lethal concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H.sub.2O.sub.2), a strong pro-oxidant/pro-apoptotic compound, for 24 h. The optimal H.sub.2O.sub.2 concentration was the concentration required to kill between 30% and 50% of all cells and was established before each experiment. In general, myoblasts were incubated with 120 μM H.sub.2O.sub.2. Dead myoblasts were identified by staining with the Muse® Count and Viability Kit, and ROS was quantified with the Muse® Oxidative Stress Kit, followed by analysis with a Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Muse apparatus (Millipore, France).
Myotubes: Myoblasts were seeded in 35 mm collagen-coated dishes, cultured in proliferation medium until confluence, and then switched to differentiation medium for 4 days. At day 2, cells were incubated with TX for 24 h prior to incubation with H.sub.2O.sub.2 for 24 h. The H.sub.2O.sub.2 concentration used in myotube cultures (550 μM) was higher than that used for myoblasts, suggesting that myotubes are resistant to apoptosis inducers (unpublished results; (Salucci, Burattini, Baldassarri, Battistelli, Canonico, Valmori, et al., 2013)). As myotubes are too big for FACS analysis, H.sub.2O.sub.2 effect was determined by quantifying lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, which is increased in the culture medium during tissue damage, using the LDH Cytotoxic Kit (ThermoFisher, France). In parallel, myotube cultures were loaded with a ROS-fluorescent probe (CellRox) followed by fluorescence quantification using a TECAN spectrophotometer.

10. RT-qPCR Assays

[0070] Myoblasts were seeded in 35 mm collagen-coated dishes, cultured in proliferation medium, pre-incubated or not with TX for 24 h, and then incubated or not with a sub-lethal concentration of H.sub.2O.sub.2 (80 μM; to avoid interference with dead cells) for 24 h. Then, total RNA was isolated from muscle cells using the NucleoSpin RNA II Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Hoerdt, France). The RNA concentration of each sample was measured with an Eppendorf BioPhotometer. cDNA was prepared using the Verso cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific, Ilkirch, France).

[0071] The expression of the CHOP (target) and RPLPO (control) genes was analysed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) on a LightCycler apparatus (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France), as previously described (El Haddad, Notarnicola, Evano, El Khatib, Blaquiere, Bonnieu, et al., 2017), using the following primers:

TABLE-US-00002 RPLPO: SEQ. ID. N.sup.o1: TCATCCAGCAGGTGTTCG SEQ. ID. N.sup.o2: AGCAAGTGGGAAGGTGTAA CHOP: SEQ. ID. N.sup.o3: AAGGAAAGTGGCACAGC SEQ. ID. N.sup.o4: ATTCACCATTCGGTCAATCAGA.

11. Western Blotting

[0072] Myoblasts were seeded in 35 mm collagen-coated dishes, cultured in proliferation medium, pre-incubated or not with TX for 24 h and then incubated or not with 80 μM H.sub.2O.sub.2 for 24 h. Protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, blocked at room temperature with Odyssey blocking buffer (Eurobio, France) and probed with the rabbit polyclonal anti-Histone H1.4 (Sigma-Aldrich; 1/5000) and rabbit polyclonal anti-gamma H2AX (Cell signalling; 1/3000) antibodies followed by IRDye® 680RD and IRDye® 800RD secondary antibodies (Eurobio, France). Fluorescence was quantified with the Odyssey software. Data were normalized to α-tubulin expression.

12. Muscle Sampling and Preparation

[0073] The experimental protocol of this study was in strict accordance with the European directives (86/609/CEE) and was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Languedoc Roussillon Region. Gastrocnemius muscles from six-month-old C57BL/6 male mice were removed and immediately placed on ice. Muscles were then minced with sterile scissors for 5 min and divided in 600 mg batches. Each batch of minced muscle was mixed with different amounts of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) (0.010%, 0.005%, 0.0025% w/w minced muscle), CA (0.015%, 0.0075%, 0.00375% w/w minced muscle) or TX (0.015%, 0.0075%, 0.00375% w/w minced muscle) dissolved in ethanol (50 μL/600 mg). A control batch was mixed only with ethanol (50 μL/600 mg). Different percentages of the three antioxidants were used to correct for the molecular weight differences. Each batch of minced muscle was divided in four portions (150 mg) using a weighing cup, and individually packaged in polypropylene film bags. Three portions were stored at 4±1° C. in the dark for 7 days. The last one (0 day) was immediately homogenized in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) (1:9) with an Ultra-Turrax homogenizer. The fraction of homogenate needed for thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) measurement was quickly frozen, and the rest was centrifuged at 1000 g at 4° C. for 15 min before storage at −20° C. for total thiols measurements. The same procedure was adopted for beef meat (“entrecote”). The pieces of meat came from animals slaughtered 1 week before.

13. α,α-Diphenyl-β-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Free Radical Scavenging Assay

[0074] Radical scavenging activity was evaluated using DPPH according to the method described by Morel et al. with some modifications (Morel, Landreau, Nguyen, Derbre, Grellier, Pape, et al., 2012). Tested extracts and standards were diluted in absolute ethanol at different concentrations. Ethanol was used as blank, and 10, 25, 50 and 75 μM Trolox were used as calibration solutions. Tested compounds or standard solutions (100 μL) were placed in 96-well plates in triplicate for each tested concentration. Absolute ethanol was added (75 μL). The reaction was initiated by adding 25 μL of freshly prepared DPPH solution (1 mM) to obtain a final volume of 200 μL/well. After 30 min in the dark at room temperature, absorbance was determined at 550 nm with a UVMAX Molecular Devices microtiter plate reader (MDS Inc., Toronto, Canada). Results were expressed as the effective concentration at which 50% of DPPH radicals were scavenged (EC.sub.50 in μg/mL). The results are the mean±standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments (three wells per concentration for each experiment).

14. TBARS Measurement

[0075] The lipid peroxidation index was determined in muscle homogenates by measuring TBARS (Sunderman, Marzouk, Hopfer, Zaharia, & Reid, 1985). Briefly, muscle homogenates were mixed with 154 mM KCl, phosphoric acid (1% v/v) and 30 mM thiobarbituric acid (TBA). The mixture was boiled at 100° C. for 1 h. After cooling, it was extracted with n-butanol and centrifuged at 1000 g at room temperature for 15 min. The fluorescence intensity of the organic phase was measured with a spectrofluorometer (Ex: 515 nm; Em: 553 nm). A standard was prepared from 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane (TEP), and results were expressed as nanomoles of TBARS per gram of tissue and were the mean±SD of three experiments.

15. Protein Oxidation Assay or Sulfhydryl Group Measurement

[0076] Total thiol quantification (Faure & Lafond, 1995) was based on the reaction of 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic) (DTNB) with the samples that produces thionitrobenzoic acid (TNB), a yellow product that can be quantified spectrophotometrically at 412 nm. Results were expressed as nanomoles of total thiols per milligram of protein and were the mean±SD of three experiments. Protein concentrations were determined using the BioRad Protein Assay (BioRad, Hercules, Calif., USA) and bovine serum albumin as standard.

16. Statistical Analysis

[0077] Statistical analysis was done with the GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, Calif., USA). All experiments were performed in triplicate. Error bars represent the SD of the mean. Statistical significance was determined using one way ANOVA; p<0.05 (*), p<0.01 (**), p<0.001 (***) and p<0.0001 (****) were considered significant.

Results and Discussion

1. Rosemary Stem Extract has a Strong Antioxidant Activity in Complex Biological System

[0078] H.sub.2O.sub.2, a strong pro-oxidant molecule, has previously been demonstrated to increase the percentage of apoptotic cells in adherent cultures of human myoblasts (skeletal muscle precursors) (Jean, Laoudj-Chenivesse, Notarnicola, Rouger, Serratrice, Bonnieu, et al., 2011).

[0079] The effect of pre-incubating human myoblasts with increasing concentrations of Rosmarinus officinalis extract from a mixture of leaves and stems (whole rosemary extract, RW) or Tempol, a powerful synthetic antioxidant, has been tested for 24 h prior to incubation with a lethal concentration of H.sub.2O.sub.2. As expected, Tempol protected human myoblasts efficiently against H.sub.2O.sub.2-induced cell death (FIG. 1A). RW also efficiently reduced cell death at all tested concentrations.

[0080] Then, Rosmarinus officinalis leaf (RL) or stem (RS) extracts have been prepared and myoblasts have been incubated with increasing concentrations of RL or RS extracts below 10 μg/mL for 24 h before addition of H.sub.2O.sub.2 and cell death quantification. RS was the most efficient in protecting myoblasts against H.sub.2O.sub.2-induced cell death at 1, 2 and 4 μg/mL (FIG. 1B). This result was quite surprising because the two main known rosemary antioxidants carnosic acid (CA) and carnosol (CO) are mainly extracted from leaves and are present at very low levels in the woody parts of the plant, such as stems (del Bano, Lorente, Castillo, Benavente-Garcia, del Rio, Ortuno, et al., 2003). This suggested that other molecule(s) might contribute to RS antioxidant activity.

2. Bioassay-Guided Isolation of the Antioxidant Compound from the RS Extract

[0081] To isolate the compound(s) responsible for the antioxidant activity of the RS extract, a bioassay-guided fractionation approach has been used. Specifically, the RS extract has been separated in CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2 and water fractions (FIG. 2) and evaluated their ability to protect myoblasts against H.sub.2O.sub.2-induced cell death. This approach demonstrated that the CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2 soluble fraction was responsible for RS antioxidant activity (data not shown). Therefore, this fraction has been further fractionated (see FIG. 2 and Methods) to obtain 50 mg of pure compound. NMR and mass spectrometry analysis identified this compound as taxodione (TX) (Rodríguez, 2003), with a purification yield of 0.33 mg of taxodione (TX)/g of dry stems or 4.1 mg/g dry extract.

[0082] To quantify TX in RS and RL extracts, a method has been developed and then validated by HPLC; this method indicated that in the RS extract, TX concentration was 11.7 mg/g dry extract, whereas it was undetectable in the RL extract (<LOD). In RS (EtOH), TX concentration was 38 mg/g dry extract. Quantification by HPLC suggested that TX concentration in the RS extract was higher than what suggested by the purification yield, implying that the conditions of extraction and purification can be improved.

3. Taxodione Protects Human Myoblasts and Myotubes Against H.sub.2O.sub.2 Induced Stress

[0083] Myoblasts were incubated with 0.125 μg/mL, 0.250 μg/mL and 0.5 μg/mL of TX for 24 h before H.sub.2O.sub.2 addition. All three concentrations had similar and strong protective effect against H.sub.2O.sub.2-induced cell death (FIG. 3A).

[0084] TX antioxidant activity has then been compared with that of the main bioactive compounds of rosemary: CA and CO (FIG. 3B). TX was significantly more efficient at all tested concentrations—whereas Inventors had found that TX displayed low DPPH free radical scavenging activity-, compared with CA, CO and rosmarinic acid that showed strong antioxidant capacities like Trolox, as previously reported (Erkan, Ayranci, & Ayranci, 2008; Luis & Johnson, 2005).

[0085] Pro-oxidant molecules, such as H.sub.2O.sub.2, promote ROS production, DNA damage, reticulum endoplasmic stress, and cell differentiation alterations. Therefore, TX capacity to efficiently protect myoblasts against H.sub.2O.sub.2 damage has been assessed. After pre-incubation with TX for 24 h and exposure to H.sub.2O.sub.2 for 24 h, the level of ROS has been quantified (FIG. 4A), of γH2AX, a protein phosphorylated upon DNA double-strand break formation (FIG. 4B), and of the CHOP gene, a marker of endoplasmic reticulum stress (FIG. 4C).

[0086] As expected, H.sub.2O.sub.2 treatment increased the levels of ROS, γH2AX proteins and CHOP mRNA. Pre-treatment with TX reduced H.sub.2O.sub.2 effects, whereas TX alone did not have any effect. During muscle cell differentiation, myoblasts, the progeny of satellite stem cells, exit the cell cycle and spontaneously differentiate into myotubes that are quiescent multinucleated cells expressing muscle-specific structural proteins. To determine whether TX displayed antioxidant activity also in more mature skeletal muscle cells, we switched confluent human primary myoblasts to differentiation medium for 4 days. At day 2, we incubated cells with TX for 24 h, followed by H.sub.2O.sub.2 for another 24 h. LDH activity and ROS level were increased in myotubes incubated only with H.sub.2O.sub.2 (FIG. 4D, E). Conversely, pre-incubation with TX significantly reduced H.sub.2O.sub.2 effects.

[0087] It has thus been demonstrated that TX protects efficiently human skeletal muscle cells against oxidative stress. This suggests that TX could be useful in human pathologies associated with oxidative stress and skeletal muscle wasting diseases. It could also improve the efficacy of therapeutic approaches in skeletal muscle diseases by reducing the strong oxidative stress associated with these conditions.

4. Taxodione Limits Lipid and Protein Oxidation in Minced Meat.

[0088] In processed meat, lipids and proteins undergo oxidation over time, but this process can be delayed by addition of antioxidants (Shah, Bosco, & Mir, 2014).

[0089] Experiments on post-mortem meat from mice to characterize the antioxidant potential of TX have been developed.

[0090] As shown in meat for food, the lipid oxidation quantified by TBARS gradually increases in mouse muscles from the second day of storage at 4° C. while the thiol levels decrease sharply indicating a high level of protein oxidation (data not shown). To determine TX antioxidant potential, the efficacy in decreasing lipid and protein oxidation of TX, CA and of the synthetic phenolic antioxidant BHT; of RS and RL and of RS, BHT, and vitamin C has been compared (FIG. 5, FIG. 7 and FIG. 8, respectively).

[0091] In minced mouse meat (CTRL), lipid oxidation, quantified by TBARS analysis, strongly increased after 7 days of storage at 4° C. Conversely, thiol levels dropped markedly, indicating a high level of protein oxidation (FIGS. 5A and B). In meat samples containing BHT, CA or TX, TBARS values were already significantly lower at day 0 (FIG. 5A) and remained lower than in control (CTRL; non-treated samples) even at day 7 (FIG. 5A). At day 0, thiol levels were comparable in control and samples with BHT, CA or TX, but not for the sample with the highest TX concentration (0.015%) where total thiol level was significantly lower (FIG. 5B). After 7 days of storage, thiol level in meat was significantly lower in control than in the samples with antioxidants, but not for 0.01% BHT (FIG. 5B). The antioxidant capacity of extract of ground rosemary stems extracted in hydro-ethanolic (RS) or ethanolic (RS (EtOH)) buffer has been compared. Ethanolic extract contains more taxodione (2.86% of taxodione; quantification by HPLC-UV at 330 nm) than the hydro-ethanolic extract (1.17% of taxodione). At day 0, the meat samples are characterized by TBARS values significantly decreased by the addition of RS or RS (EtOH) (FIG. 6). At 7j, RS or RS (EtOH) treated samples maintained TBARS values at very low levels compared to the control group at the same day (FIG. 6). However, the “ethanolic” extract of rosemary stems is significantly more effective than the “hydro-ethanolic” extract.

[0092] In addition, these assays also show an inhibition of lipid oxidation in meat of RS (EtOH) significantly improved compared to the inhibition of lipid oxidation in meat of RL (FIG. 7) and of vitamin C (FIG. 8).

[0093] These results show a protective effect of TX on lipid and protein oxidation during meat storage comparable to that of BHT and CA and RS (EtOH) better than RL and vitamin C.

Example 2—Comparison of Several Rosemary Extracts

2.1. Quantification of Taxodione in Several Products

Methods of Extraction:

[0094] Hydro-ethanolic and ethanolic maceration for RS, RSE, RL: dry and ground matter was extracted in hydro-ethanolic solution or ethanol (ratio plant/solvent: 1 g/10 mL) by maceration during 7 days. Then, filtration and evaporation under reduce pressure give a dry extract.

[0095] Hexanic extraction for RSJ-Hexane and RL-Hexane. To enhance yield of extraction of taxodione, dry and ground matter was extracted with hexane (ratio plant/solvent: 1 g/10 mL) under sonication during 3*15 min. Then, filtration and evaporation under reduce pressure give a dry extract. This method was used to obtain an enriched extract. This method was also used to prepare leaf extracts.

RS: Rosemary Stem

[0096] RS: Extract of stems macerated in hydro-ethanolic solvent for 7 days.
RSE: Extract of stems macerated in ethanolic solvent for 7 days
RSJ-Hexane: Ultrasonic extraction of stems in hexane

RL: Rosemary Leaves

[0097] RL: Extract of leaves macerated in hydro-ethanolic solvent for 7 days.
RL-Hexane: Ultrasonic extraction of leaves in hexane

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE II Products Taxodione (mg/g extract) RS 10.6 ± 1.2 (n = 3) RSE 33.6 ± 3.0 (n = 7) RSJ-Hexane 55.2 ± 4.0 (n = 3) RL <LOD (0.43 mg/g) (n = 6) RL-Hexane <LOD (0.43 mg/g) (n = 3) E392 (VIVOX 15) <LOD (0.43 mg/g) (n = 3) (LOD: Limit of detection)

2.2. Effect of Taxodione Enriched Extracts on the Peroxidation of Mice Meat Lipids (FIG. 9)

[0098] The antioxidant activity of E392 has been compared to extracts enriched in TX on their capacity to decrease lipid oxidation in minced meat.

[0099] Preparation of RSE and RSJ-Hexane is as described in paragraph 2.1.

[0100] In minced mouse muscles (CTRL), lipid oxidation, quantified by TBARS analysis, strongly increased after 7 days of storage at 4° C. In post-mortem muscle samples containing E392, RSE or RSJ-Hexane, TBARS values were significantly lower at the concentration of 0.04% and 0.01%. No significant differences were observed at 0.04% concentration between E392, RSE or RSJ-Hexane. However, at a concentration of 0.01%, RSE or RSJ-Hexane were more efficiency to decrease TBARS levels than E392.

2.3. Effect of Taxodione Enriched Extracts on the Peroxidation of Beef Meat Lipids (FIG. 10)

[0101] To validate these results on meat for human consumption, minced beef meat was treated with BHT, TX, E392, RSE or RSJ-Hexane for 7 days at 4° C. As expected, lipid oxidation greatly increased after 7 days of storage. As demonstrated in mouse muscle, lipid oxidation remained low in BHT, TX, E392, RSE or RSJ-Hexane treated minced beef: RSJ-Hexane were more efficiency to decrease TBARS levels than E392.

[0102] These results confirm a protective effect of TX and extracts enriched in TX on the oxidation of lipids and proteins during storage of meat. These results from beef meat assays are similar with what has been observed from post-mortem mice muscles.

[0103] These experiments also validate rodent as an animal model useful for predicting skeletal muscle post-mortem changes and establishing biological tests to preserve the integrity of the meat.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[0104] Abou-Donia, A., Assaad, A. M., Ghazy, N. M., Tempesta, M. S., & Sanson, D. R. (1989). Diterpene quinones from the roots of Rosmarinus officinalis L. Alexandria Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3(1), 54-55. [0105] AKARPAT, A., TURHAN, S., & USTUN, N. S. (2008). EFFECTS OF HOT-WATER EXTRACTS FROM MYRTLE, ROSEMARY, NETTLE AND LEMON BALM LEAVES ON LIPID OXIDATION AND COLOR OF BEEF PATTIES DURING FROZEN STORAGE. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 32(1), 117-132. [0106] Altinier, G., Sosa, S., Aquino, R. P., Mencherini, T., Della Loggia, R., & Tubaro, A. (2007). Characterization of topical antiinflammatory compounds in Rosmarinus officinalis L. J Agric Food Chem, 55(5), 1718-1723. [0107] Bakirel, T., Bakirel, U., Keles, O. U., Ulgen, S. G., & Yardibi, H. (2008). In vivo assessment of antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) in alloxan-diabetic rabbits. J Ethnopharmacol, 116(1), 64-73. [0108] Birtic, S., Dussort, P., Pierre, F. X., Bily, A. C., & Roller, M. (2015). Carnosic acid. Phytochemistry, 115, 9-19. [0109] Borras-Linares, I., Perez-Sanchez, A., Lozano-Sanchez, J., Barrajon-Catalan, E., Arraez-Roman, D., Cifuentes, A., Micol, V., & Carretero, A. S. (2015). A bioguided identification of the active compounds that contribute to the antiproliferative/cytotoxic effects of rosemary extract on colon cancer cells. Food Chem Toxicol, 80, 215-222. [0110] Borras-Linares, I., Stojanovic, Z., Quirantes-Pine, R., Arraez-Roman, D., Svarc-Gajic, J., Fernandez-Gutierrez, A., & Segura-Carretero, A. (2014). Rosmarinus officinalis leaves as a natural source of bioactive compounds. Int J Mol Sci, 15(11), 20585-20606. [0111] Canton, M., Menazza, S., & Di Lisa, F. (2014). Oxidative stress in muscular dystrophy: from generic evidence to specific sources and targets. J Muscle Res Cell Motil, 35(1), 23-36. [0112] Choi, M. H., Ow, J. R., Yang, N. D., & Taneja, R. (2016). Oxidative Stress-Mediated Skeletal Muscle Degeneration: Molecules, Mechanisms, and Therapies. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2016, 6842568. [0113] del Bano, M. J., Lorente, J., Castillo, J., Benavente-Garcia, O., del Rio, J. A., Ortuno, A., Quirin, K. W., & Gerard, D. (2003). Phenolic diterpenes, flavones, and rosmarinic acid distribution during the development of leaves, flowers, stems, and roots of Rosmarinus officinalis. Antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem, 51(15), 4247-4253. [0114] Ding, Y., Choi, K. J., Kim, J. H., Han, X., Piao, Y., Jeong, J. H., Choe, W., Kang, I., Ha, J., Forman, H. J., Lee, J., Yoon, K. S., & Kim, S. S. (2008). Endogenous hydrogen peroxide regulates glutathione redox via nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 downstream of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase during muscle differentiation. Am J Pathol, 172(6), 1529-1541. [0115] El Haddad, M., Notarnicola, C., Evano, B., El Khatib, N., Blaquiere, M., Bonnieu, A., Tajbakhsh, S., Hugon, G., Vernus, B., Mercier, J., & Carnac, G. (2017). Retinoic acid maintains human skeletal muscle progenitor cells in an immature state. Cell Mol Life Sci, 74(10), 1923-1936. [0116] El-Lakany, A. M. (2004). Chlorosmaridione; a novel chlorinated diterpene quinone methide from Rosmarinus officinalis L. Natural Product Sciences, 10(2), 59-62. [0117] Erkan, N., Ayranci, G., & Ayranci, E. (2008). Antioxidant activities of rosemary (Rosmarinus Officinalis L.) extract, blackseed (Nigella sativa L.) essential oil, carnosic acid, rosmarinic acid and sesamol. Food Chem, 110(1), 76-82. [0118] Faure, P., & Lafond, J. L. (1995). Measurement of plasma sulfhydryl and carbonyl groups as a possible indicator of protein oxidation. In A. E. Favier, J. Cadet, B. Kalyanaraman, M. Fontecave & J. L. Pierre (Eds.), Analysis of Free Radicals in Biological Systems, (pp. 237-248). Basel: Birkhäauser Basel. [0119] Hirasawa, Y., Izawa, E., Matsuno, Y., Kawahara, N., Goda, Y., & Morita, H. (2007). Taxodistines A and B, abietane-type diterpenes from Taxodium distichum. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 17(21), 5868-5871. [0120] Hueso-Rodríguez, J. A., Jimeno, M. L., Rodríguez, B., Savona, G., & Bruno, M. (1983). Abietane diterpenoids from the root of Salvia phlomoides. Phytochemistry, 22(9), 2005-2009. [0121] Jean, E., Laoudj-Chenivesse, D., Notarnicola, C., Rouger, K., Serratrice, N., Bonnieu, A., Gay, S., Bacou, F., Duret, C., & Carnac, G. (2011). Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity promotes survival of human muscle precursor cells. J Cell Mol Med, 15(1), 119-133. [0122] Kitzmann, M., Bonnieu, A., Duret, C., Vernus, B., Barro, M., Laoudj-Chenivesse, D., Verdi, J. M., & Carnac, G. (2006). Inhibition of Notch signaling induces myotube hypertrophy by recruiting a subpopulation of reserve cells. J Cell Physiol, 208(3), 538-548. [0123] Kupchan, S. M., Karim, A., & Marcks, C. (1968). Taxodione and taxodone, two novel diterpenoid quinone methide tumor inhibitors from Taxodium distichum. J Am Chem Soc, 90(21), 5923-5924. [0124] Kuzma, L., Kaiser, M., & Wysokinska, H. (2017). The production and antiprotozoal activity of abietane diterpenes in Salvia austriaca hairy roots grown in shake flasks and bioreactor. Prep Biochem Biotechnol, 47(1), 58-66. [0125] Kuzma, L., Wysokinska, H., Sikora, J., Olszewska, P., Mikiciuk-Olasik, E., & Szymanski, P. (2016). Taxodione and Extracts from Salvia austriaca Roots as Human Cholinesterase Inhibitors. Phytother Res, 30(2), 234-242. [0126] Lo, A. H., Liang, Y. C., Lin-Shiau, S. Y., Ho, C. T., & Lin, J. K. (2002). Carnosol, an antioxidant in rosemary, suppresses inducible nitric oxide synthase through down-regulating nuclear factor-kappaB in mouse macrophages. Carcinogenesis, 23(6), 983-991. [0127] Luis, J. C., & Johnson, C. B. (2005). Seasonal variations of rosmarinic and carnosic acids in rosemary extracts. Analysis of their in vitro antiradical activity. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(1), 7. [0128] Morel, S., Landreau, A., Nguyen, V. H., Derbre, S., Grellier, P., Pape, P. L., Pagniez, F., Litaudon, M., & Richomme, P. (2012). Preparative isolation, fast centrifugal partition chromatography purification and biological activity of cajaflavanone from Derris ferruginea stems. Phytochem Anal, 23(2), 152-158. [0129] Naveena, B. M., Vaithiyanathan, S., Muthukumar, M., Sen, A. R., Kumar, Y. P., Kiran, M., Shaju, V. A., & Chandran, K. R. (2013). Relationship between the solubility, dosage and antioxidant capacity of carnosic acid in raw and cooked ground buffalo meat patties and chicken patties. Meat Sci, 95(2), 195-202. [0130] Newman, D. J., & Cragg, G. M. (2012). Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. J Nat Prod, 75(3), 311-335. [0131] Ortuno, J., Serrano, R., Jordan, M. J., & Banon, S. (2016). Relationship between antioxidant status and oxidative stability in lamb meat reinforced with dietary rosemary diterpenes. Food Chem, 190, 1056-1063. [0132] Papuc, C., Goran, G. V., Predescu, C. N., & Nicorescu, V. (2017). Mechanisms of Oxidative Processes in Meat and Toxicity Induced by Postprandial Degradation Products: A Review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 16(1), 96-123. [0133] Passerieux, E., Hayot, M., Jaussent, A., Carnac, G., Gouzi, F., Pillard, F., Picot, M. C., Bocker, K., Hugon, G., Pincemail, J., Defraigne, J. O., Verrips, T., Mercier, J., & Laoudj-Chenivesse, D. (2015). Effects of vitamin C, vitamin E, zinc gluconate, and selenomethionine supplementation on muscle function and oxidative stress biomarkers in patients with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Free Radic Biol Med, 81, 158-169. [0134] Perez-Fons, L., Garzon, M. T., & Micol, V. (2010). Relationship between the antioxidant capacity and effect of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) polyphenols on membrane phospholipid order. J Agric Food Chem, 58(1), 161-171. [0135] Rodríguez, B. (2003). 1H and 13C NMR spectral assignments of some natural abietane diterpenoids. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, 41(9), 741-746. [0136] Salucci, S., Burattini, S., Baldassarri, V., Battistelli, M., Canonico, B., Valmori, A., Papa, S., & Falcieri, E. (2013). The peculiar apoptotic behavior of skeletal muscle cells. Histol Histopathol, 28(8), 1073-1087. [0137] Shah, M. A., Bosco, S. J., & Mir, S. A. (2014). Plant extracts as natural antioxidants in meat and meat products. Meat Sci, 98(1), 21-33. [0138] Sirocchi, V., Devlieghere, F., Peelman, N., Sagratini, G., Maggi, F., Vittori, S., & Ragaert, P. (2017). Effect of Rosmarinus officinalis L. essential oil combined with different packaging conditions to extend the shelf life of refrigerated beef meat. Food Chem, 221, 1069-1076. [0139] Srancikova, A., Horvathova, E., & Kozics, K. (2013). Biological effects of four frequently used medicinal plants of Lamiaceae. Neoplasma, 60(6), 585-597. [0140] Steinhubl, S. R. (2008). Why have antioxidants failed in clinical trials? Am J Cardiol, 101(10A), 14D-19D. [0141] Sunderman, F. W., Jr., Marzouk, A., Hopfer, S. M., Zaharia, O., & Reid, M. C. (1985). Increased lipid peroxidation in tissues of nickel chloride-treated rats. Ann Clin Lab Sci, 15(3), 229-236. [0142] Xiong, Y. L. (2017). Inhibition of hazardous compound formation in muscle foods by antioxidative phytophenols. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1398(1), 37-46. [0143] Ahmed, A. S. and Ei-Emary, N. A. (1999). Biologically active abietane diterpenes from Taxodium distichum seeds. Bull Pharm Sci, Assiut Univ 22 (1), 21-25. [0144] Búfalo, J., Cantrell, C. L., Jacob, M. R., Schrader, K. K., Tekwani, B. L., Kustova, T. S., Ali, A. and Boaro, C. S. F. (2016). Antimicrobial and antileishmanial activities of diterpenoids isolated from the roots of Salvia deserta. Planta Med 82, 131-7. [0145] Chan, H. H., Hwang, T. L., Su, C. R., Reddy, M. V. B. and Wu, T. S. (2011). Anti-inflammatory, anticholinesterase and antioxidative constituents from the roots and the leaves of Salvia nipponica Miq. var. formosana. Phytomedicine 18, 148-50. [0146] Eghtesadi, F., Farimani, M. M., Hazeri, N. and Valizadeh, J. (2016). Abietane and nor-abitane diterpenoids from the roots of Salvia rhytidea. SpringerPlus 5, 1068. [0147] Esquivel, B., Flores, M., Hernandez-Ortega, S., Toscano, R. A. and Ramamoorthy, T. P. (1995). Abietane and icetexane diterpenoids from the roots of Salvia aspera. Phytochem 39 (1), 139-43. [0148] Fraga, B. M., Diaz, C. E., Guadano, A. and Gonzalez-Coloma, A. (2005). Diterpenes from Salvia broussonetii transformed roots and their insecticidal activity. J Agric Food Chem 53, 5200-6. [0149] Gandomkar, S., Yousefi, M., Habibi, Z. and As'habi, M. A. (2012). A new triterpene from Salvia xanthocheila Boiss. Nat Prod Res 26 (7), 648-53. [0150] Habibi, Z., Cheraghi, Z., Ghasemi, S. and Yousefi, M. (2012). A new highly hydroxylated triterpene from Salvia atropatana Bunge. Nat Prod Res 26(20), 1910-3. [0151] Ikeshiro, Y., Mase, I. and Tomita, Y. (1991). Abietane-type diterpene quinones from Salvia nipponica. Planta Med 57(6): 588. [0152] Kasimu, R., Tezuka, Y., Tanaka, K., Gong, Z. N., Li, J. X., Basnet P., Namba, T. and Kadota, S. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of diterpenoid constituents of seventeen Salvia plants Journal of traditional medicines 15(2), 109-15. [0153] Ke, R. F., Xu, S. C., Song, P., Deng, S. H., Ma, X. H. and Yang, X. Z. (2017). Crystal structure of taxodione isolated from Taxodium ascendens (B.). Acta Cryst E73, 1102-4. [0154] Kupchan, S. M., Karim, A. and Marcks, C. (1969). Taxodione and taxodone, two novel diterpenoid quinone methide tumor inhibitors from Taxodium distichum. J Org Chem 34(12): 3912-8. [0155] Kusumoto, N., Ashitani, T, Hayasaka, Y., Murayama, T., Ogiyama, K. and Takahashi, K. (2009). Antitermitic activities of abietane-type diterpenes from Taxodium distichum cones. J Chem Ecol 35, 635-642. [0156] Kusumoto, N., Ashitani, T., Murayama, T., Ogiyama. K. and Takahashi K. (2010). Antifungal abietane-type diterpenes from the cones of Taxodium distichum Rich. J Chem Ecol 36, 1381-6. [0157] Kusumoto, N., Aburai, N., Ashitani, T., Takahashi, K. and Kimura K. (2014). Pharmacological prospects of oxygenated abietane-type diterpenoids from Taxodium distichum cones. Adv Biol Chem 4, 109-15. [0158] Kuzma, L., Kisiel, W., Królicka, A. and Wysokinska, H. (2011). Genetic transformation of Salvia austriaca by Agrobacterium rhizogenes and diterpenoid isolation. Pharmazie 66, 904-7. [0159] Kuzma, L., Wysokinska, H., Rozalski, M., Budzynska, A., Wieckowska-Szakielc, M., Sadowska, B., Paszkiewicz, M., Kisiel, W. and Rozalska, B. (2012). Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm properties of new taxodione derivative from hairy roots of Salvia austriaca. Phytomedicine 19, 1285-7. [0160] Kuzma, L., Wysokinska, H., Rozalski, M., Krajewska, U. and Kisiel, W. (2012). An unusual taxodione derivative from hairy roots of Salvia austriaca. Fitoterapia 83, 770-3. [0161] Kuzma, L. and Wysokinska, H. (2014). UPLC-DAD Determination of taxodione content in hairy roots of Salvia austriaca Jacq. Acta Chromatogr 26(4), 671-81. [0162] Kuzma, L., Wysokinska, H., Sikora, J., Olszewska, P., Mikiciuk-Olasik, E. and Pawel Szymanski, P. (2016). Taxodione and extracts from Salvia austriaca roots as human cholinesterase inhibitors. Phytother Res 30, 234-42. [0163] Kuzma, L., Kaiser, M. and Wysokinska, H. (2017). The production and antiprotozoal activity of abietane diterpenes in Salvia austriaca hairy roots grown in shake-flasks and bioreactor. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 47(1), 58-66. [0164] Li, M., Zhang, J. S., Ye, Y. M. and Fang, J. N. (2000). Constituents of the Roots of Salvia prionitis. J Nat Prod 63, 139-41. [0165] Luis, J. G. and Grille, T. A. (1993). New diterpenes from Salvia munzii: chemical and biogenetic aspects. Tetrahedron 49 (28), 6217-84. [0166] Machumi, F., Samoylenko, V., Yenesew, A., Derese, S., Midiwo, J. O., Wiggers, F. T., Jacob, M. R., Tekwani, B. L., Khan, S. I., Walker, L. A. and Muhammad, I. (2010). Antimicrobial and antiparasitic abietane diterpenoids from the roots of Clerodendrum eriophyllum. Nat Prod Commun 5(6), 853-8. [0167] Mirzaei, H. H., Firuzi, O., Schneider, B., Baldwin, I. T. and Jassbi, A. R. (2017). Cytotoxic diterpenoids from the roots of Salvia lachnocalyx. Rev Bras Farmacogn 27, 475-9. [0168] Mothana, R. A., Al-Said, M. S., Al-Musayeib, N. M., El Gamal, A. A., Al-Massarani, S. M., Al-Rehaily, A. J., Abdulkader, M. and Maes, L. (2014). In vitro antiprotozoal activity of abietane diterpenoids isolated from Plectranthus barbatus Andr. Int J Mol Sci 15, 8360-71. [0169] Moujir, L., Gutierrez-Navarro, A. M., San Andres, L. and Luis, J. G. (1996). Bioactive diterpenoids isolated from Salvia mellifera. Phytother Res 10, 172-4. [0170] Naman, C. B., Gromovsky, A. D., Vela, C. M., Fletcher, J. N., Gupta, G., Varikuti, S., Zhu, X., Zywot, E. M., Chai, H., Werbovetz, K. A., Satoskar, A. R., and Kinghorn, D. (2016). Antileishmanial and cytotoxic activity of some highly oxidized abietane diterpenoids from the bald cypress, Taxodium distichum. J Nat Prod 79, 598-606. [0171] Sabri, N. N., Abou-Donia, A. A., Assad, A. M., Ghazy, N. M., El-Lakany, A. M., Tempesta, M. S and Sanson, D. R. (1989). Abietane diterpene quinones from the roots of Salvia verbenaca and S. lanigera. Planta Med 55(6), 582. [0172] Salae, A. W., Rodjun, A., Karalai, C., Ponglimanont, C., Chantrapromma, S., Kanjana-Opas, A., Tewtrakul, S. and Fun, H. K. (2012). Potential anti-inflammatory diterpenes from Premna obtusifolia. Tetrahedron 68, 819-29. [0173] Simoes, F., Michavila, A., Rodriguez, B., Garcia-Alvarez, M. C. and Hasan, M. (1986). A quinone methide diterpenoid from the root of Salvia moorcraftiana. Phytochem 25 (3), 755-6. [0174] Tayarani-Najaran, Z., Mousavi, S. H., Tajfard, F., Asili, J., Soltani, S., Hatamipour, M. and Emami, S. A. (2013). Cytotoxic and apoptogenic properties of three isolated diterpenoids from Salvia chorassanica through bioassay-guided fractionation. Food Chem Toxicol 57, 346-51. [0175] Tezuka, Y., Kasimu, R., Li, J. X., Basnet, P., Tanaka, K., Namba, T. and Kadota, S. (1998). Constituents of roots of Salvia deserta Schang. (Xinjiang-Danshen). Chem Pharm Bull 46 (1), 107-12. [0176] Topçu, G. and Ulubelen, A. (1996). Abietane and rearranged abietane diterpenes from Salvia montbretii. J Nat Prod 59, 734-7. [0177] Topçu, G., Altiner, E. N., Gozcu, S., Halfon, B., Aydogmus, Z., Pezzuto, J. M., Zhou, B. N. and Kingston, D. G. I. (2003). Studies on di- and triterpenoids from Salvia staminea with cytotoxic activity. Planta Med 69, 464-7. [0178] Topçu, G., Kolak, U., Öztürk, M., Boga, M., Hatipoglu, S. D., Bahadori, F., Çulhaoglu, B. and Dirmenci, T. (2013). Investigation of anticholinesterase activity of a series of Salvia extracts and the constituents of Salvia staminea. The Natural Products Journal 3, 3-9. [0179] Ulubelen, A. and Tuwci, E. (1990). New diterpenes from Salvia pachystachys. J Nat Prod 53(6), 1597-9. [0180] Ulubelen, A. and Topçu, G. (1992). New abietane diterpenoids from Salvia montbretii. J Nat Prod 55 (4), 441-4. [0181] Ulubelen, A., Topçu, G., Chai, H. B. and Pezzuto, J. M. (1999). Cytotoxic activity of diterpenoids isolated from Salvia hypargeia. Pharm Biol 37 (2), 148-51. [0182] Zaghloul, A. M., Gohar, A. A., Naiem, Z. A. and Abdel Bar F. M. (2008). Taxodione, a DNA-Binding compound from Taxodium distichum L. (Rich.). Z Naturforsch C 63(5-6), 355-60. [0183] Zhang, J., Rahman, A. A., Jain, S., Jacob, M. R., Khan, S. I., Tekwani, B. L. and Bias, M. (2012). Antimicrobial and antiparasitic abietane diterpenoids from Cupressus sempervirens. Res Rep Med Chem 2, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRMC.S29902).