Processing quarantined materials

Abstract

A method and an apparatus for destroying biosecurity hazards in quarantined feed materials and producing valuable products that are safe and have economic value is disclosed. The apparatus includes a continuous converter (3) that has a reaction chamber (5) for producing a solid carbon-containing product, a gas product, and optionally an oil product and a separate water-based condensate product in the chamber, via pyrolysis or other reaction mechanisms.

Claims

1. A method for converting a feed material to a plurality of products in a continuous converter including a reaction chamber, an inlet for supplying the feed material to an upstream end of the reaction chamber, an assembly for moving the feed material through the reaction chamber from the upstream end towards a downstream end of the reaction chamber, and a plurality of outlets for discharging the products from the reaction chamber, the method including the steps of: (a) supplying the feed material to the upstream end of the reaction chamber via the inlet, the feed material comprising quarantined materials and biomass, the quarantined materials comprising between 25 wt % and 50 wt % of the total mass of the quarantined materials and the biomass; (b) moving the feed material through the reaction chamber from the upstream end to the downstream end and exposing the feed material within the reaction chamber to a time-temperature profile such that the feed material is heated from 200° C. to 600° C. over a period of 5-20 minutes which destroys biosecurity hazards in the feed material and dries and pyrolyses organic material in the feed material and releases water vapour and a volatile products gas phase from the feed material as the feed material moves through the reaction chamber; (c) moving the water vapour and the volatile products gas phase produced in step (b) through the reaction chamber in a direction counter to that of the feed material so that at least a part of the water vapour and condensable components of the volatile products gas phase condense in cooler upstream sections of the reaction chamber and form liquid water and liquid oil, at least the liquid oil being carried forward in the reaction chamber by the feed material to higher temperature regions of the reaction chamber and being progressively volatilised and cracked to a non-condensable gas; (d) discharging from the reaction chamber (i) a gas product via a gas product outlet and (ii) a dried and pyrolysed solid carbon-containing product from a solid product outlet; and (e) condensing water vapour from the gas product outside the chamber and forming a liquid water product.

2. The method defined in claim 1 wherein the feed material is less than 25 mm in size.

3. The method defined in claim 1 wherein less than 15 wt. % of the total mass of the feed material has a particle size of less than 1 mm.

4. The method defined in claim 1 wherein the amount of moisture in the feed material is less than 20 wt. % of the total mass of the feed material.

5. The method defined in claim 1 further comprising controlling the gas product composition by controlling the temperature profile in the reactor and therefore the residence time within a required temperature range.

6. The method defined in claim 1 further comprising maintaining a required temperature profile in the reaction chamber by supplying an oxygen-containing gas to the reaction chamber and at least partially combusting combustible gases in the reaction chamber.

7. The method defined in claim 1 further comprising establishing a temperature profile in the reaction chamber that includes the following zones extending successively along the length of the reaction chamber from the upstream end to the downstream end of the reaction chamber: (a) a drying zone for drying the feed material to form a dried feed material, (b) a pre-heating zone for heating the dried feed material to form a dried and heated feed material, and (c) a thermo-chemical reaction zone for thermally decomposing the dried and heated feed material and producing the solid carbon-containing product and gas.

8. The method defined in claim 1 further comprising supplying an oxygen-containing gas to the reaction chamber.

9. The method defined in claim 2, wherein the feed material is less than 20 mm in size.

10. The method defined in claim 3, wherein less than 10 wt. % of the total mass of the feed material has a particle size of less than 1 mm.

11. The method defined in claim 4 wherein the amount of moisture in the feed material is less than 15 wt. % of the total mass of the feed material.

12. The method defined in claim 6, wherein the oxygen-containing gas is air.

13. The method defined in claim 7, wherein the drying zone includes an end proximate the inlet having a temperature between 60-80° C. and wherein the upper temperature limit within the drying zone is between 100-150° C.

14. The method defined in claim 7, wherein the upper temperature limit of the drying zone is between 100-150° C.

15. The method defined in claim 1, wherein the solid-containing product comprises char.

16. The method defined in claim 8, wherein the oxygen-containing gas is air.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The present invention is described further by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:

(2) FIG. 1 is a diagram that illustrates one embodiment of a method and an apparatus for destroying biosecurity hazards in quarantined materials and producing valuable products that are safe and have economic value in accordance with the present invention;

(3) FIG. 2 is a temperature/time profile in the reaction chamber of a continuous converter for carrying out the method illustrated in FIG. 1, with the profile being generated from trial data described below;

(4) FIG. 3 is a perspective view of one embodiment of an apparatus in the form of a continuous converter in accordance with the invention;

(5) FIG. 4 is a transverse cross-section through the continuous converter along the line 5-5 shown in FIG. 4

(6) FIG. 5 is a temperature-time graph at a series of locations along the length of a reactor for a trial with a feed material comprising 100 wt. % wood feed material, i.e. 0 wt. % simulated quarantined material, used as a reference in trials of an embodiment of the method and the apparatus of the invention, with the graph illustrating a 1 hour period of the trial;

(7) FIG. 6 is a temperature-time graph at a series of locations along the length of a reactor for a trial with a feed material comprising 35 wt. % simulated quarantined material and 65 wt. % wood as additional biomass in trials of the embodiment of the method and the apparatus of the invention mentioned in the description of FIG. 5, with the graph illustrating a 1 hour period of the trial;

(8) FIG. 7 is a temperature-time graph for a feed material comprising 35 wt. % actual quarantined material in the form of aircraft catering waste and 65 wt. % wood as additional biomass in a trial of the embodiment of the method and the apparatus of the invention;

(9) FIG. 8 is an embodiment of a method for destroying biosecurity hazards in quarantined materials in the form of aircraft catering waste in accordance with the invention;

(10) FIG. 9 is diagram of the unit operations of an embodiment of a plant for destroying biosecurity hazards in quarantined materials in accordance with the invention; and

(11) FIG. 10 illustrates diagrammatically the feed preparation unit operations of the plant shown in FIG. 9.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

(12) FIG. 1 is a diagram that illustrates one embodiment of a method and apparatus for destroying biosecurity hazards in quarantined materials and producing valuable products that are safe and have economic value in accordance with the invention.

(13) With reference to FIG. 1, feed material in the form of quarantined materials and additional biomass in the form of wood waste is supplied at ambient temperature to an inlet of a reaction chamber 5 of continuous converter 3 shown diagrammatically in FIG. 1 and in more detail in FIGS. 3 and 4 and also described in International applications PCT/AU2009/000455 (WO2009/124359) and PCT/AU2014/001020 (WO2015/061833) in the name of the applicant.

(14) The feed material is moved through the reaction chamber 5 from an inlet 41 at an upstream end 7 to a downstream end 9 of the chamber and is exposed to a temperature profile that reaches a maximum of 650° C. over a selected time period within the chamber 5 that destroys biosecurity hazards in the quarantined materials and pyrolyses the organic material in the feed material and releases water vapour and a volatile products gas phase as the feed material moves through the reaction chamber.

(15) The water vapour phase and the volatile products gas phase produced by heating the feed material moves in a direction counter to that of the feed material. At least a part of the condensable components of the volatile products gas phase condense in cooler upstream sections of the chamber and form liquid oil/tars. The liquid oil/tars are carried forward in the reaction chamber by the feed material to the higher temperature regions of the reaction chamber and is progressively volatilised and cracked to a non-condensable gas. In some circumstances, liquid oil may be allowed to drain from the reactor 5 as a product.

(16) A gas product and a dried and pyrolysed solid carbon-containing product are discharged from separate respective outlets 15, 35 in the reaction chamber 5.

(17) The temperature profile in the reaction chamber 5 is selected and controlled so that the gas product discharged from the reaction chamber 5 is at a temperature of the order of 80° C. The gas product is transported away from the reaction chamber 5 and the water vapour phase and condensable components of the volatile products gas phase condense in cooler upstream sections at a temperature of the order of 30° C. and form (a) a water-based condensate product (water recovered from a pyrolysis process is typically somewhat acidic and contains dilute smoke chemicals and other organics; it is often referred to as pyroligneous acid or “wood vinegar” and has beneficial applications in horticulture) and (b) a separate fuel gas product that has sufficient calorific value to be combusted as an energy source.

(18) The quarantined materials may be as described above.

(19) As described above, the quarantined materials include biosecurity hazards and these hazards include any unwanted biological material—virus, bacteria, higher organisms such as fungi, plants and animals, by way of example, pathogens in animal material (including animal waste) and invasive species in food, plant material, wood, and animal material.

(20) The additional biomass may be any suitable biomass having regard to the operational requirements for destroying the biosecurity hazards in the quarantined materials. These requirements take into account the nature of the quarantined materials and the operational requirements for moving quarantined materials though the reactor 5, having regard to the structural characteristics of the quarantined materials. The preferred char, gas and water outputs are also a consideration in the selection of the additional biomass. Wood waste is an example of a suitable additional biomass.

(21) The relative amounts of the quarantined materials and the additional biomass may be selected as required having regard to the requirements for destroying the biosecurity hazards in the quarantined materials and materials handling considerations.

(22) The solid char, gas and water-based condensate product outputs are intrinsically valuable, with a wide range of potential material and energy applications in industry and agriculture.

(23) Embodiments of suitable temperature profile in the reaction chamber are shown in FIG. 2.

(24) FIG. 2 was generated from trial data described in more detail below.

(25) The horizontal axis of FIG. 2 is time that a unit of feed material has been in the reaction chamber 5 measured in minutes and the vertical axis of the Figure is temperature in ° C. Time is a measure of position along the length of the reaction chamber 5.

(26) FIG. 2 shows the results of trials with 5 different feed materials, with the feed materials of each trial having different amounts of quarantined material (labelled SFCW and QFCW in the Figure).

(27) FIG. 2 shows that the temperature of the feed material in each trial increased steadily to approximately 250° C. after 8 minutes within the reaction chamber 5.

(28) FIG. 2 also shows that the temperature of the feed material having no quarantined material then increased quickly generally linearly during the next 4 minutes to 600° C. This sharp increase indicates thermo-chemical reactions of the feed material, i.e. Zone 3 of the temperature profile described above.

(29) FIG. 2 also shows similar sharp increases in temperature at later start times having increasing proportions of quarantined material, with the start times being a function of the increasing proportions of quarantined material in the feed materials. Basically, the steady heating of the feed materials continued along the lower gradient line shown in the Figure until the temperature reached a point where significant thermo-chemical reactions commenced and there was a sharp increase in temperature.

(30) It is evident from FIG. 2 that the five feed materials had the same basic temperature-time profiles, with the only differences being the temperature and time at which the increased heating rate commenced.

(31) Basically, FIG. 2 shows an extended temperature-time gradient in a countercurrent solids/gas reactor. The trial results described below establish that the extended temperature-time gradient shown in FIG. 2 make it possible to process quarantined feed materials in a safe and effective way and generate valuable products.

(32) FIG. 2 illustrates that the temperature profile in the reaction chamber includes the following zones extending successively along the length of the reaction chamber from the upstream end to the downstream end of the reaction chamber: (a) a drying zone (Zone 1) for drying the feed material—typically increasing from 60-80° C. at the inlet to 100-150° C. at the upper temperature limit of Zone 1, (b) a pre-heating zone (Zone 2) for heating the feed material to a temperature that is suitable for the thermo-chemical reactions required in the Zone 3—typically 250-300° C. is the upper limit of Zone 2, and (c) a thermo-chemical reaction Zone 3 for thermally decomposing the feed material and producing a solid carbon-containing, typically char product, and gas.

(33) With reference to FIGS. 3 and 4, the embodiment of the apparatus in the form of a continuous converter, generally identified by the numeral 3, for destroying biosecurity hazards in quarantined materials shown in the Figures includes a reaction chamber 5 that has an upstream colder end 7, an inlet 41 for feed material (including quarantined materials and additional biomass material), a downstream hotter end 9, outlets 13, 35 for discharging liquid water and gas products respectively from the chamber 5 at the upstream end, and an outlet 15 for discharging a solid carbon-containing product, for example in the form of char, at the downstream end of the chamber 5.

(34) The converter 3 also comprises a feed hopper 37 for suppling organic feed material to the upstream end of the reaction chamber. The feed hopper may be a sealed or an open hopper.

(35) The converter 3 also comprises an assembly that forces feed material continuously forwardly in the reaction chamber 5 from the upstream end 7 towards the downstream end 9. The assembly comprises three parallel rotatable shafts 17 and screw feeders 19 on the shaft. The screw feeders 19 are interleaved. One shaft 19 is a motor-driven shaft via motor M4 and the other shafts 19 are linked to rotate with the driven shaft. This is a simple and reliable arrangement whereby rotation of the shafts 17 about their axes forces feed material from the upstream end towards the downstream end of the chamber 5. The feed screw arrangement can include a single or any other suitable number of multiple screws, which may or may not be interleaved.

(36) The converter 3 also includes an intruder 21 (i.e. a gas-sealed entry device) for supplying feed material to the reaction chamber 5 and an extruder 23 (i.e. a gas-sealed discharge device) for discharging the solid carbon-containing product from the chamber 5. Each device includes two screws 27, 29 on the same axis. The screws 27, 29 are mounted to counter-rotate with respect to each other about the axis. It is noted that the screws 27, 29, may be arranged to rotate in the same direction. The screws are separated by an axial gap 25. The intruder 21 controls the rate of supplying feed material to the reaction chamber 5 and compresses feed material and forms a seal that minimises escape of gas from the chamber 5 via the intruder. Each screw 27, 29 is independently driven by a motor M1, M2 with variable speed capability so that in use the downstream screw 27 runs at a slower rotation rate than the upstream screw 29. The difference in the rates of rotation causes feed material supplied to the upstream screw 29 from the feed hopper 37 and transported to the gap 25 to be compressed in the gap 25 and to enter the downstream screw 27 as compressed material and to travel forward as compressed material via the downstream screw 27.

(37) The method and the seal quality may be controlled by setting the motor torque of the motors M1 and M2 to a level determined to be required to deliver a required level of compression. Typically, motor torque and not rate of rotation is set for control purposes. Typically, the rate of rotation of the upstream screw 29 is linked directly to the rate of rotation of the motor-driven screw feeder 19 in the reaction chamber 5 to control throughput. Typically, the rate of rotation of the downstream screw 27 is controlled to maintain constant torque of the upstream screw 29 of the intruder 21 to control compression. The packing density of the feed material to achieve a required seal may be dependent on a number of factors, including the characteristics of the feed material. The characteristics may include the packing characteristics of the feed material.

(38) It is noted that the opposite arrangement may be used for control purposes. Specifically, the rate of rotation of the downstream screw 27 may be linked directly to the rate of rotation of the motor-driven screw feeder 19 in the reaction chamber 5 to control throughput and the rate of rotation of the upstream screw 29 may be controlled to maintain constant torque of the downstream screw 27 of the intruder 21 to control compression.

(39) Similarly, the extruder 23 controls the rate of discharging solid carbon-containing product from the reaction chamber 5 and forms a seal that prevents escape of gas from the reaction chamber 5 via the extruder 23. The intruder 21 and the extruder 23 have the same basic structural components and these are identified by the same reference numerals in the Figures.

(40) The converter 3 also includes a feed assembly generally identified by the numeral 11 for controlling the flow of feed material from the intruder 21 to the inlet 41 of the reaction chamber 5. The feed assembly 11 includes a transfer chute that is in the form of a distribution box 43 between an outlet 45 of the intruder 21 and the inlet 41 of the reaction chamber 5 and a sweeper blade 47 that is rotatable about a central vertical axis of the distribution box 43 via operation of a motor M3 to control the distribution of feed material to the reaction chamber inlet 41.

(41) In use, feed material from the outlet 45 of the intruder 21 falls downwardly through the inlet 41 into an upstream end of the reaction chamber 5 and is moved forward, for example by means of an auger in the reaction chamber, through the reaction chamber 5 and is thermally decomposed and then discharged as a solid carbon-containing product from the chamber 5 via the extruder 23, with liquid water and gas products also being produced and discharges from the chamber 5 via the outlets 13, 35 as the feed material moves through the chamber 5.

(42) Typically, the feed rate to the reaction chamber 5 is controlled to ensure that the chamber is full of feed material.

(43) The sweeper blade 47 is important to ensuring that there is a uniform distribution of feed material delivered to the inlet of the reaction chamber 5, i.e. so that the reaction chamber 5 is full of feed material.

(44) The level of feed material in the distribution box 43 is also an important consideration from an operational viewpoint. The applicant has found that the apparatus may block if the level of feed material is too high.

(45) The method of operating the converter 3 includes measuring the torque on the sweeper blade 47 to provide an indication of the level of feed material in the distribution box and adjusting the rate of rotation of the upstream screw of the intruder 21 to control the supply rate of feed material to maintain the desired level of feed material in the distribution box 43.

(46) The converter 3 has structural features that make it possible to establish and maintain a required temperature profile in the reaction chamber 5 to operate one embodiment of the method of the present invention in the reaction chamber 5.

(47) In particular, important features of the converter 3 include, for example, selection of the length of the reaction chamber 5, selection of the feed (e.g. biomass) and the feed rate (i.e. organic material) through the chamber 5, providing targeted injection of oxygen-containing gas into the chamber 5, providing targeted injection of liquid water into a downstream end of the chamber 5 for char cooling, and providing a means for achieving internal heat transfer within the chamber.

(48) The converter 3 is particularly suited for a method that operates so that there is total destruction of the liquid oil product produced in the chamber. Specifically, the method is operated so that there is volatilization and cracking of liquid oil and tar product that forms in the chamber to the extent that there is total destruction of the liquid oil and tar product into a non-condensable gas that is discharged from the upstream end of the chamber. Having said this, there may be situations in which it is desirable to drain some oil from the chamber 5 as a separate product.

(49) The applicant has carried out a series of trials on simulated quarantined material in the form of simulated flight catering waste as produced typically during an aircraft flight. The applicant has also carried out a trial on actual quarantined material supplied by an airline.

(50) The trials are described below.

(51) A. Trials on Simulated Quarantined Material

(52) Feed Preparation

(53) Trials were conducted with simulated flight catering waste (SFCW).

(54) The “recipe” of the SFCW was based on a Qantas audit of material collected from international flights arriving at Mascot Airport in Sydney.

(55) Table 1 summarises the components of the SFCW:

(56) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 SFCW Components Proportion SFCW Components (dry weight) Sourcing and Preparation Food 58% Dehydration product, Eco-Guardians, Melbourne Plastic 20% 30% LDPE, 30% HDPE, 30% PP, 10% HIPS, Astron Plastics, Ingleburn Paper 13% House Without Steps, Mayfield Aluminium  4% PAR Recycling, Somersby Glass  4%

(57) The SFCW was also prepared to the following feed material specification of the applicant:

(58) total moisture content <15%.

(59) size: minus 20 mm and <10% minus 1 mm.

(60) The SFCW was blended with clean wood waste to produce three blends, one blend having 15 wt. % SFCW, a second blend having 25 wt. % SFCW, and a third blend having 35% SFCW.

(61) Trial Procedure

(62) In total, six processing trials were conducted at around 300 kg/hr, with an accumulated operating period of some 25 hours.

(63) In each trial, after a period of at least 1 hour of stable operation with clean wood waste in the reaction chamber 5 of the converter 3, controlled amounts of SFCW were added each minute to the metering screw of the feed hopper of the apparatus. The additions corresponded to 15 wt. %, 25 wt. % and 35 wt. % SFCW in the SFCW/wood blends.

(64) It was found in the trials that, in this range of SFCW additions, stable operations and effective carbonisation were achieved.

(65) The maximum SFCW level trialled, i.e. 35 wt. % SFCW in the SFCW/wood blends, was adopted for subsequent consolidation runs, involving emission monitoring and the processing of actual quarantined material.

(66) Effective Carbonisation

(67) The degree of carbonisation (char making) is an indicator of the effectiveness of the apparatus in processing SFCW/wood blends. The reason for this is that, if there is effective decomposition of the lignin, cellulose and hemi-cellulose to char, it follows that biota cannot survive and the various organics in the food, plastic and paper will also decompose.

(68) Table 2 summarises the carbonisation of the SFCW/wood blends and a comparative example for 100% wood.

(69) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Carbonisation Results Char Properties (DAF basis) Clean Wood 15% SFCW 25% SFCW 35% SFCW Calorific 33.8 33.4 33.4 33.3 Value (GJ/t) Volatile 10.2 9.8 12.1 13.4 Matter (%) Carbon (%) 90 90 89 88 Hydrogen (%) 2.3 2.0 2.4 2.4 Oxygen (%) 5.6 5.8 6.4 6.7

(70) A dry ash-free (DAF) calorific value above 30 GJ/t is a measure of effective carbonization. The addition of SFCW to wood in SFCW/wood blends up to 35% SFCW did not compromise the carbonisation process (DAF CV >33 GJ/t in all cases).

(71) Process Stability

(72) It was clear from the trial data, for example FIGS. 5 and 6, that the addition of SFCW up to 35 wt. % in the SFCW/wood blends did not compromise process stability.

(73) The control system of the apparatus made adjustments to the operating parameters in response to the changes in feed properties (composition and packing density).

(74) For instance, the solids moved more slowly through the apparatus with 35 wt. % SFCW compared to the 100% wood reference, but the net production rate was higher due to the increased packing density of the blend.

(75) FIGS. 5 and 6 are temperature-time graphs for 1 hour periods of trials with 0 and 35 wt. % SFCW at different positions along the length of the reactor.

(76) It is clear from the Figures that the temperature profiles at the same positions are similar.

(77) The data showed the same results with the other trials.

(78) Temperature-Time

(79) As discussed above, FIG. 2 shows the temperature-time profiles of trials with five different feed materials, the feed materials of each trial having different amounts of quarantined material (labelled SFCW and QFCQ in the Figure). Four of the plots in FIG. 2 are for trials on 0, 15 wt. %, 25 wt. %, and 35% SFCW.

(80) As discussed above, FIG. 2 shows that the temperature of the feed material in each trial increases steadily to approximately 250° C. after 8 minutes within the reaction chamber 5.

(81) The temperature of the feed material that had no quarantined material increased quickly generally linearly from this point during the next 4 minutes to 600° C.

(82) FIG. 2 also shows similar sharp increases in temperature at later start times, with the start times being a function of the increasing proportions of quarantined material in the feed materials.

(83) From a quarantine management perspective, one of the key factors is “time at temperature” for the solids travelling through the reaction chamber 5 of the converter 3.

(84) For perspective, the distance the solids travel from feed entry to char discharge is some 4 m and there was a total residence time of solids inside the apparatus of around 15 minutes.

(85) On the journey through the reaction chamber 5, the solids are first fully dried, then pre-heated and finally carbonised in the reactor section.

(86) The results of the trials show that times at temperature are clearly sufficient to destroy biota in the flight catering waste, thus eliminating bio-security risks.

(87) Furthermore, the times at temperatures for effective thermal decomposition of wood and the plastics and other organics in the catering waste (300-600° C.), were not compromised (ca 5 minutes) by the presence of the SFCW.

(88) The times at temperature are illustrated by Table 3 below.

(89) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Catering Waste in Blend 35% 0% SFCW 15% SFCW 25% SFCW SFCW Total Time in 13.4 14.6 14.0 16.8 CBC Time above 100° C. 11.3 13.0 12.4 14.9 Time above 200° C. 7.4 8.6 8.0 10.3 Time above 300° C. 5.0 5.2 5.0 4.6 Time above 400° C. 3.5 3.3 3.0 3.4 Time above 500° C. 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.6

(90) As an approximation, and having regard to FIG. 2, the first third of the journey through the reaction chamber 5 of the converter 3, i.e. Zone 1, dries the feed material (with solids reaching temperatures of 100-150° C.), the second third, i.e. Zone 2, preheats the feed material (to 250-300° C.), and the final section, i.e. Zone 3, is where the bulk of the thermo-chemical reactions take place with peak temperatures in the reactor reaching around 650° C.

(91) Products

(92) The trials produced valuable solid char, wood vinegar (i.e. a water-based condensate), and gas products. These are commercially valuable products

(93) Test work verified the effectiveness of the embodiment of the method and apparatus of the invention in terms of destroying bio-security hazards and in producing valuable products.

(94) In particular, the analysis of the trials showed that the gas generated from processing 35 wt. % SFCW is clean burning, with all emission monitoring parameters, except NOx and HCl, well below the Australian EPA Group 6 standards, without a gas cleaning step prior to combustion. There are counter-measures available for the NOx and HCl emissions.

(95) The results are summarised in Table 4 below.

(96) TABLE-US-00004 Emissions EPA Group 6 (35 wt. % Gas Combustion Parameters Limits SFCW) Smoke (Opacity) 20% No visible Particulates 50 24 VOC's (as n-propane) 40 5.4 Chlorine 200 <0.07 Fluorides (as HF) 50 <0.08 Hydrogen Chloride 100 490 Hydrogen Sulphide 5 <0.5 Type 1 and 2 Metals Total 1 0.098 Cadmium 0.2 <0.0006 Mercury 0.2 <0.0002 Dioxins/Furans (ng/Nm.sup.3 TEQ) 0.1 0.012 No.sub.x (as NO.sub.2) 450 560 Sulphuric Acid Mist (as SO.sub.3) 100 25 Sulphur Dioxide 1,000 140

(97) B. Trials—Actual Quarantined Material

(98) Once the basic operating parameters, product assessments and emissions monitoring had been completed with SFCW, there was a final trial using actual quarantine catering waste from Qantas international flights arriving at Mascot Airport, Sydney. This waste is described below as QFCW.

(99) The preparation and execution of this trial was closely supervised by the Australian Federal Government quarantine regulator, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources. Department officers were on site for three days to ensure that the trial was conducted successfully within the agreed protocols.

(100) About 600 kg of actual catering waste was collected from Mascot Airport.

(101) An initial proposal of separating out the bulk liquids and the plastic, glass and aluminium, and only drying the food, proved impractical, given the wet and compacted nature of the material. All the QFCW was dried in the as-received mixed condition.

(102) The dried material was shredded in its mixed form ready for feeding to the reactor chamber 5 of the converter 3. The dried material was subsequently added to the metering screw of the converter 3. Clean wood was delivered via the hopper. Blending of QFCW and timber took place within the enclosed feed system of the reactor (at 35% QFCW blend rate).

(103) The processing in the reaction chamber 5 was conducted over a 5 hour period.

(104) After 2 hours of stable operations with the wood reference material, controlled additions of the QFCW were made for 2 hours. This was followed by a 1 hour return to clean wood processing.

(105) FIG. 7 is a temperature-time graph for the trial FIG. 7 shows that there was stable operation in the trial. In this regard, whilst the operating parameters (air injection rates and throughput) were adjusted by the control system for the period of QFCW additions, process stability was not compromised.

(106) It is noted that the temperature-time results for simulated and actual quarantine flight catering waste shown in the Figures, at 35% blending rate, were very similar. This is validation for the simulation methodology.

(107) Inputs and outputs were measured in the trial to determine the product mass and energy yields.

(108) The results are shown in Table 6 on a “per tonne of feed” basis.

(109) Table 5—Product Yields Per Tonne of Feed Material

(110) TABLE-US-00005 Wood only 35% QFCW Feed Material 1,000 kg 1,000 kg (moisture content) 17.6 GJ 17.8 GJ (12%) (11%) Char (dry weight 328 kg 272 kg basis) 10.8 GJ 8.0 GJ Wood Vinegar 434 litres 444 litres Product Gas 496 Nm.sup.3 545 Nm.sup.3 2.8 GJ 4.4 GJ

(111) It is evident from the data in Table 5 that: Compared to the wood only feed material, 35% QFCW produced less char mass and energy and more gas volume and energy. The wood vinegar, i.e. water-based condensate product, yield remained essentially unchanged and was substantially the same for both feed materials.

(112) Some 20% of typical flight catering waste is made up of plastics, and this is the likely explanation of the lower char yield and higher gas yield for the 35 wt. % QFCW.

(113) The data is presented in FIG. 8 on an annualised basis, scaled to the volumes of Qantas international flight catering waste at Mascot (4,000 t/a), which after de-watering and drying becomes 2,000 t/a QFCW as feed material. Annual production assumes a converter feed ratio of 2:1 timber to flight catering waste.

(114) It is noted that char and wood vinegar yields and properties were taken from the final trial with actual quarantine flight catering waste (QFCW). This trial was conducted with 35 wt. % flight catering waste (dried and shredded) in the reaction chamber 5 feed.

(115) Plant for Processing Quarantined Material

(116) An engineering study of a commercial plant for processing timber and quarantine flight catering wastes has been made.

(117) The plant was designed based on the process parameters established in the trials, including a 2:1 weight ratio of timber to quarantine flight catering waste in the feed material.

(118) The plant developed in the study is shown in FIGS. 9 and 10.

(119) FIG. 8 is also relevant. Basically, FIG. 8 is an embodiment of a method of destroying biosecurity hazards in quarantined materials in the form of aircraft catering waste in accordance with the invention, with feed inputs and product outputs.

(120) The inputs to the plant, scaled to Qantas international flight waste at Mascot, are 4,000 t/a timber waste and 4,000 t/a flight catering waste (QFCW).

(121) The plant unit operations successively shred, dewater and dry the QFCW on site to 2,000 t/a.

(122) The wood waste is delivered to the site in a form ready for processing in the converter.

(123) Thus, the plant processes 6,000 t/a of prepared material.

(124) More particularly, with reference to FIG. 9, the unit operations of the plant include: (a) unpacking quarantined material, (b) sizing and shredding the quarantined material, (c) de-watering the shredded quarantined material, with the removed water being filtered and discharged; (d) drying the de-watered solids of the quarantined material, (e) transferring the dried quarantined material to an inlet of the converter 3; (f) blending the dried quarantined material and a wood waste of required feed properties at the inlet end of the converter 3, (g) processing the blended feed material in the reaction chamber of the converter 3, (h) recovering products in the form of a gas, solid char and water-based condensate (wood vinegar).

(125) FIG. 10 illustrates diagrammatically an embodiment of the feed preparation unit operations for quarantined material described in items (a) to (e) above.

(126) By way of summary, the method and the apparatus of the present invention create a completely unique thermo-chemical environment compared to known pyrolysis technologies that are commercially available or under development and this environment provides a safe and effective option for processing quarantined materials and producing valuable products.

(127) Many modifications may be made to the embodiment of the method and the apparatus of the present invention shown in the drawings without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

(128) By way of example, whilst the embodiment described in relation to the drawings includes three parallel rotatable shafts 17 and interleaved screw feeders 19 on the shafts 17, the invention is not limited to this arrangement and extends to any alternative arrangements for moving feed material along the chamber 5 and is not limited to this number of rotatable shafts 17 and interleaved screw feeders 19.

(129) By way of further example, whilst the embodiment described in relation to the drawings includes particular forms of the intruder 21 and the extruder 23, the invention is not limited to this arrangement and extends to any alternative arrangements for supplying feed material to the chamber 5 and discharging solid product from the chamber 5 which creates effective gas seals for the chamber 5.

(130) By way of further example, whilst the embodiment described in relation to the drawings includes a particular feed assembly 11 for controlling the flow of feed material from the intruder 21 to the inlet 41 of the reaction chamber 5, the invention is not limited to this arrangement and extends to any suitable alternative arrangements.

(131) Throughout this specification the word “comprise”, or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps, but not the exclusion of any other element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps.