TEST BOTTLE PROTOCOL METHOD

Abstract

In the method for checking a container inspection system with at least two detection devices, the at least two detection devices are configured to check a first and a second area of the containers to be inspected. A test container is fed to the container inspection system. The test container has a test feature in a first area to be inspected and a marking in a second area to be inspected, which is read by one of the detection devices and with which the test container can be identified as a test container. Also disclosed is a test container for use in connection with the disclosed method.

Claims

1. A method for checking a container inspection system with at least two detection devices, wherein the at least two detection devices are configured to check a first and a second area of the containers to be inspected, wherein a test container is fed to the container inspection system, and wherein the test container has a test feature in a first area to be inspected and a marking in the second area to be inspected, which marking is read out by one of the detection devices and with which the test container can be identified as a test container.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the marking is an optically readable code.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the code unambiguously identifies a test container.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the container inspection system comprises a plurality of detection devices with which a plurality of different areas of the containers are inspected, wherein the test container has a test feature in one of the container areas, and wherein the other container areas of the test container are each provided with a marking which is read out by the detection devices associated with these test areas and with which the test container can be detected.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the container inspection system comprises a plurality of detection devices with which a plurality of different areas of the containers are inspected, wherein the test container is provided with several test features in different container areas, and wherein container areas which do not have a test feature are provided with a marking which is read out by the detection devices associated with these test areas and with which the test container can be detected.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the detection devices of the container inspection system comprise a bottom inspection, an outer sidewall inspection, an inner sidewall inspection, a alkaline residue detection, a thread inspection, a rust ring detection or a mouth inspection.

7. A test container for checking a container inspection system, the system comprising at least two detection devices configured to check a first and a second area of containers, wherein the test container has a test feature in a first area to be inspected that can be detected by the first detection device, and wherein the test container has a marking in a second area to be inspected which is read by the second detection device and with which the test container can be identified as a test container.

8. The test container according to claim 7, wherein the marking is an optically readable code.

9. A method for checking a container inspection system having at least two detection devices which are configured to check a first area and a second area of the containers to be inspected, the method comprising the steps: feeding a test container into the inspection system, the test container having a test feature in the first area and a marking in the second area, reading out, by one of the detection devices, the marking to identify the test container as a test container.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0024] Various embodiments are illustrated in the drawings, in which:

[0025] FIG. 1 is a test container with an error feature in the bottom area and a marking on the side wall;

[0026] FIG. 2 is a test container with an error feature in the bottom area and markings on the side wall and in the mouth region.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0027] FIG. 1 shows a test container 10, which is suitable for use in the test container protocol method disclosed herein. The test container 10 is a bottle, which as test feature 12 has an error in the bottom area 14. The test container 10 is placed in the bottle flow and passed through a container inspection system (not shown) on a conveyor 16.

[0028] In this case the test container 10 is prepared in such a way that a spherical foreign body is adhered to its bottom area as test feature 12, which must be detected by the container inspection system. A marking 20 is provided on the side wall 18 of the test container 10, with which the test container 10 can be unambiguously identified as a test container. The marking 20 also contains the information that the test feature 12 is a spherical foreign body, which is located in the bottom area 14 of the test container 10. In this case, the marking 20 on the side wall 18 is an adhesive label that can be easily detected and read by the cameras of the side wall inspection. An image analysis software known to the skilled person can be used to read the information given on the label 20.

[0029] When the test container 10 passes through the inspection system, the bottom inspection will detect the test feature 12, i.e. the error in the bottom area 14, and reject the bottle as erroneous. At the same time, the sidewall inspection will detect the marking 20 and identify the container as test container 10. A corresponding entry will then be made in the test bottle protocol so that the proper functioning of the container inspection system is documented.

[0030] However, if the test feature 12 is not recognized, the test container 10 is still recognized as test container 10 due to the marking 20 on the side wall 18 and is separated from the product flow. This ensures that no test container 10 remains in the product flow and possibly gets into the consumer circuit. In this case too, a corresponding entry is made in the test protocol and appropriate measures are taken to ensure the continued functioning of the inspection system. These measures may include ordering an inspection or even a temporary shutdown of the inspection system.

[0031] FIG. 2 shows a further embodiment. Again, a test container 10 is passed through a container inspection system on a conveyor.

[0032] In this case, the container inspection system has three detection devices, namely a mouth inspection 22, a side wall inspection 24 and a bottom inspection 26. Each of these detection devices 22, 24, 26 is formed by a radiation source 22a, 24a, 26a and an associated detection device 22b, 24b, 26b.

[0033] The test container 10 again has an error 12 in the bottom area 14, which must be detected by the bottom inspection 26 a,b. In the other two test areas, i.e. on the side wall 18 and in the mouth region 28, a marking 20,30 is provided in each case, which identifies the container as test container 10 and contains the information about the type and location of the test feature 12.

[0034] The mode of operation of this embodiment is essentially identical to the mode of operation described in FIG. 1. However, the fact that in this case the marking 20, 30 is provided in two areas increases the operational safety of this embodiment even more. In the unlikely event that neither the bottom inspection 26 a,b detects the test feature 12 nor the side wall inspection 24 a,b detects the test container marking 20 on the side wall 18, the test container marking 30 is also provided in the mouth region 28 of the test container 10 as an additional redundant safety measure, so that a further detection device 22 a,b is provided here to identify the test container 10 as such.

[0035] Inadvertent failure to reject a test container 10 can be almost completely ruled out here, as it is extremely unlikely that all three detection devices 22 a,b, 24 a,b and 26 a,b will malfunction simultaneously.

[0036] With this embodiment, the protocol can be kept in such a way that not only is it recorded whether the test containers 10 have all been correctly detected, but it can also be recorded whether all detection devices 22 a,b, 24 a,b and 26 a,b have delivered consistent results. Depending on the performance of the individual detection devices 22 a,b, 24 a,b and 26 a,b, the inspection system can then be checked immediately or at a possibly more suitable later time.