High-purity large-scale preparation of stannsoporfin

Abstract

Large scale (bulk) compositions comprising high-purity stannsoporfin are disclosed, as well as methods of synthesizing such compositions.

Claims

1. A composition comprising stannsoporfin, wherein the stannsoporfin is at least about 97% pure, and wherein any individual impurity is present in an amount less than about 0.08%, the stannsoporfin formed by: a) contacting a solution or suspension of tin (II) oxide with a mesoporphyrin IX or salt thereof under conditions suitable to form a crude stannsoporfin; and b) purifying the crude stannsoporfin to form the stannsoporfin.

2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition comprises palladium in an amount of less than about 20 ppm.

3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition comprises palladium in an amount of less than about 10 ppm.

4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition comprises at least about 10 grams of stannsoporfin.

5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition comprises at least about 100 grams of stannsoporfin.

6. The composition of claim 1, wherein the stannsoporfin is a single-batch preparation of stannsoporfin.

7. The composition of claim 1, wherein the stannsoporfin is at least about 98.5% pure.

8. The composition of claim 1, wherein any impurity present is present in an amount of about 0.07% or less.

9. The composition of claim 1, wherein the purifying the crude stannsoporfin comprises a hot acid trituration, followed by treatment at high pH at or above pH 9 followed by re-acidification, and subsequent hot acid trituration.

10. The composition of claim 1, wherein the mesoporphyrin IX of salt thereof is formed by contacting hemin with a pre-hydrogenated catalyst.

11. The composition of claim 10, wherein the pre-hydrogenated catalyst is formed by exposing a metallic hydrogenation catalyst to a hydrogen atmosphere.

12. The composition of claim 1, wherein the mesoporphyrin IX or salt thereof comprises mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride.

13. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition further comprises at least one impurity in an amount between about 0.05% and about 0.08%, the at least one impurity having a relative retention time of 0.72-0.73 in an HPLC analysis.

14. A composition comprising stannsoporfin, wherein the stannsoporfin is at least about 97% pure, and wherein any individual impurity is present in an amount less than about 0.08%, the stannsoporfin formed by: a) exposing a metallic hydrogenation catalyst to a hydrogen atmosphere to form a pre-hydrogenated catalyst; b) contacting hemin with the pre-hydrogenated catalyst to form a mesoporphyrin IX or salt thereof; c) contacting a solution or suspension of tin (II) oxide with the mesoporphyrin IX or salt thereof under conditions suitable to form a crude stannsoporfin; and d) purifying the crude stannsoporfin via hot acid trituration, followed by treatment at high pH at or above pH 9 followed by re-acidification, and subsequent hot acid trituration to form the stannsoporfin.

15. The composition of claim 14, wherein the metallic hydrogenation catalyst comprises palladium on carbon.

16. The composition of claim 14, wherein the mesoporphyrin IX or salt thereof comprises mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride.

17. The composition of claim 14, wherein the composition comprises palladium in an amount of less than about 20 ppm.

18. The composition of claim 14, wherein the composition comprises palladium in an amount of less than about 10 ppm.

19. The composition of claim 14, wherein the composition comprises at least about 10 grams of stannsoporfin.

20. The composition of claim 14, wherein the stannsoporfin is at least about 98.5% pure.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(1) In one embodiment of the current invention, stannsoporfin is prepared in large quantity at high purity. In another embodiment of the current invention, stannsoporfin is prepared in large quantity at high purity, wherein the large quantity is prepared as a single batch. Stannsoporfin (tin (IV) mesoporphyrin IX dichloride; Chemical Abstracts Registry Number 106344-20-1) is also known by the trade name Stanate®, which is a registered trademark of InfaCare Pharmaceutical Corp., Plymouth Meeting, Pa. Stannsoporfin has the following structure:

(2) ##STR00001##
having molecular formula C.sub.34H.sub.36Cl.sub.2N.sub.4O.sub.4Sn and molecular weight 754.29.

(3) By “large quantity,” “large scale,” or “bulk” is meant at least about 10 grams. Other quantities for large scale production of stannsoporfin are at least about 25 grams, at least about 50 grams, at least about 100 grams, at least about 200 grams, at least about 500 grams, at least about 1.0 kg, at least about 2.0 kg, or at least about 5.0 kg.

(4) By “single batch” is meant that the amount of the product specified is synthesized at one time. A single batch is typically produced after a reaction (or series of reactions) is carried out once (note that a single preparation of the compound subjected as a whole to one or more reactions repeatedly, such as repeated purifications, is considered a single batch). A single batch thus excludes multiple preparations of a compound carried out at separate times, or in divided amounts, which are later combined.

(5) By “high purity” is meant a preparation that meets both of the following two criteria: 1) the overall level of purity is at least about 97%; that is, the desired product (stannsoporfin) accounts for at least 97% of the preparation; and 2) any individual product-related impurity present is present in an amount of less than about 0.1% of the preparation. The purity is preferably measured by HPLC analysis. A “product-related” impurity is an impurity that requires characterization by the guidelines of the United States Food and Drug Administration; accordingly, components of the drug product such as water are not considered an impurity.

(6) By “unmetallated porphyrin” is meant a porphyrin lacking a metal ion coordinated by one or more pyrrole nitrogens. A “metallated porphyrin” is a porphyrin having a metal ion coordinated by at least one pyrrole nitrogen.

(7) By “intermediate oxidation state” is meant an element, such as a metal, which is present in an oxidation state intermediate between its neutral (uncharged, or zero oxidation state) and its most highly oxidized state. By way of non-limiting example, iron typically forms oxidation states of (0), (II), and (III); the (II) oxidation state (ferrous state) is an intermediate oxidation state.

(8) The purity of the preparation is important for use of the compound as a pharmaceutical. The overall level of purity can be at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 98.5%, at least about 99%, or at least about 99.5%. A high-purity preparation is also defined, as above, as a preparation with the additional condition that any individual impurity present is present in an amount of less than about 0.1% of the preparation. (Note that the total amount of impurities may exceed 0.1%—for example, one impurity may be present at 0.08%, and another at 0.07%, totaling 0.15%—but when measured individually, no impurity is present at amounts equal to or exceeding about 0.1%.) In another embodiment, any individual impurity present is present in an amount of less than about 0.09%. In another embodiment, any individual impurity present is present in an amount of less than about 0.08% or less. In another embodiment, any individual impurity present is present in an amount of about 0.07% or less. Water can be present in the preparation, even in significant amounts (at least about 1% to 5%), but it not considered an impurity. Other residual solvents, such as acetone, formic acid, and acetic acid, are also not considered impurities, especially if they occur at or below the permissible levels described in the guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline—Impurities: Guideline for Residual Solvents, Q3C(R3), Step 4 version, November 2005 (World-Wide-Web.ich.org/LOB/media/MEDIA423.pdf).

(9) In an alternate embodiment, the stannsoporfin has no impurity present in an amount greater than about 0.2%, and more preferably has no impurity present in an amount greater than 0.15%, and still more preferably has no impurity present in an amount greater than 0.12%.

(10) The current synthesis produces stannsoporfin meeting the two criteria listed under high-purity above (overall purity of at least about 97%, without treating water or residual solvents as impurities, and any individual impurity present is present in an amount of about 0.1% or less). The second criterion, regarding the level of individual impurities, is of interest due to regulatory requirements. The Food and Drug Administration of the United States of America typically requires detailed characterization of impurities at a level equal to 0.1%, while impurities present at a level below 0.1% need not be characterized in detail unless they have unusually potent pharmacological or toxic effects at a level of less than 0.1% (see the publications Guidance for Industry: ANDAs: Impurities in Drug Substances, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), November 1999; available at World-Wide-Web-site-.fda.gov/cder/guidance/2452fnl.htm; and Guidance for Industry Q3A Impurities in New Drug Substances, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), February 2003 ICH, Revision 1, available at World-Wide-Web-site-.fda.gov/cder/guidance/4164fnl.pdf). By meeting these threshold conditions set by the Food and Drug Administration, the high-purity material has significant advantages over material of lower purity from the regulatory standpoint.

(11) Another advantage of the invention as described herein is the expected reproducibility of the synthesis, providing the ability to generate repeated batches of high-purity stannsoporfin in large quantity. Another advantage of the invention as described herein is the ability of the process and product to meet requirements for Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), as defined by law, regulation, or regulatory agency requirements in various countries (for example, current Good Manufacturing Practice as specified in the United States Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Sections 210 and 211).

(12) Another advantage of the invention as described herein is the production of high-purity bulk amounts of stannsoporfin in a single batch, with concomitant advantages of increased homogeneity, lower synthetic cost, and relative ease of characterization.

(13) Synthesis of Stannsoporfin at High Purity

(14) As porphyrins are light-sensitive compounds, the starting materials, intermediates, products, and solutions or suspensions thereof should be protected from light exposure, and stored in a dark location in light-excluding containers.

(15) Synthesis of stannsoporfin proceeds with hemin (iron (III) protoporphyrin IX chloride) as a starting material. The quantities required for large-scale synthesis are obtained from porcine red blood cells. Hemin DMF grade is purchased from Harimex (Loenen, The Netherlands); the material is used without purification prior to use (purity as supplied is greater than about 98% by HPLC). The hemin is heated in organic solvent with a hydrogenation catalyst on carbon under a hydrogen atmosphere. This reductive step serves both to remove the Fe ion from the porphyrin ring, and to reduce the protoporphyrin IX vinyl groups to ethyl groups (thus converting the protoporphyrin IX into mesoporphyrin IX), as indicated in the following scheme.

(16) ##STR00002##

(17) A preferred hydrogenation catalyst is palladium on carbon, used in an amount of about 0.0135 to 0.0165 equivalents, preferably about 0.015 equivalents. Other suitable catalysts can be used, including palladium metal particles, platinum on carbon, platinum metal particles, nickel, or nickel-aluminum catalyst, provided that residual amounts of catalyst in the product meet pharmaceutical specifications. The nickel-aluminum catalyst can be RANEY nickel (RANEY is a registered trademark of W. R. Grace & Co., New York, N.Y.). A preferred organic solvent is formic acid.

(18) It was discovered that pre-treatment of the Pd/C catalyst with hydrogen gas prior to addition of hemin to the reaction reduces palladium impurities and thus contributes to the overall purity of the final stannsoporfin product. Without pro-hydrogenation of the catalyst prior to hemin addition, residual palladium levels of about 50 ppm were detected in the product, which is significantly above the product specifications of less than about 20 ppm residual palladium. With the pre-hydrogenation step, residual palladium was reduced to undetectable levels (less than about 5 ppm residual palladium). Accordingly, the improved synthesis provides for levels of residual palladium levels in the product tin (IV) mesoporphyrin IX dichloride of less than about 20 ppm palladium, preferably less than about 15 ppm palladium, more preferably less than about 10 ppm palladium, still more preferably less than about 5 ppm palladium. The pre-hydrogenation of the catalyst can be performed under a hydrogen atmosphere of about 15 to 75 psi (about 1 to 5 bar; about 100,000 to 500,000 Pascals), preferably about 30 to 50 psi (about 2 to 3.5 bar; about 200,000 to 350,000 Pascals), more preferably about 40 psi (about 2.75 bar or 275,000 Pascals). The temperature for pre-hydrogenation of the catalyst can vary between about 25 to 60° C., preferably about 35 to 50° C., more preferably about 40 to 45° C. The time period for pre-hydrogenation of the catalyst can range from about 2 to 48 hours, preferably from about 6 to 24 hours, more preferably from about 8 to 16 hours, still more preferably about 12 hours.

(19) Thus, typically, the catalyst is added to the chemical reactor first, followed by the formic acid solvent (for example, about 17.5 to 22.5 parts solvent, preferably about 20 parts solvent). Before addition of solvent, the hydrogen can be evacuated and the reactor can be filled with a nitrogen atmosphere for safety reasons. Upon completion of formic acid addition, the nitrogen atmosphere is replaced by a hydrogen atmosphere, at, for example, about 40 pounds per square inch (approximately 2.75 bar or 275,000 Pascals). The temperature is then adjusted to about 35 to 50° C. preferably about 40 to 45° C., for approximately 8 to 24 hours, preferably about 12 hours, prior to introduction of the hemin starting material into the reactor. The prehydrogenated catalyst suspension is then cooled, followed by addition of hemin (in solvent) to the reactor. The hydrogen atmosphere is evacuated during the introduction of hemin for safety purposes, leaving only the hydrogen associated on the Pd/C catalyst. The reactor is re-pressurized to about 30 to 35 psi with hydrogen, and the reaction is agitated at about 20 to 25° C. for about 30 minutes. The reaction is then warmed to about 80 to 100° C., preferably to about 85 to 90° C., with vigorous agitation, and hydrogen pressure is increased to about 50 to 70 psi (about 3.4 to 4.8 bar or about 340,000 to 480,000 Pascals), preferably about 55 to 60 psi (about 3.8 to 4.2 bar or about 380,000 to 420,000 Pascals). The reaction temperature is maintained for about 1 to 3 hours, preferably about 1 to 1.5 hours. The reaction is then cooled to about 40 to 60° C., preferably to about 45 to 50° C., and hydrogen pressure maintained and hydrogenation continued for about 18 to 48 hours, preferably 20 to 30 hours, more preferably about 24 hours.

(20) The reaction is then cooled and depressurized with evacuation of hydrogen from the reactor. Diatomaceous earth (such as HYFLO SUPERCEL, a registered trademark of Celite Corp., Santa Barbara, Calif.), activated carbon (such as DARCO KB, a registered trademark of NORIT Americas, Inc., Marshall, Tex.), and solvent are added to the reactor. The suspension is filtered, and the filter cake is washed with solvent. This treatment serves to remove residual iron and residual palladium from the material.

(21) The filtrate is concentrated by distillation under vacuum (which can be performed at room temperature, or at lower temperatures, such as at approximately 10 to 15° C.) to remove excess solvent. A precipitant, for example, an ether such as methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE), is then added, over a period of at least about 30 seconds to at least about 3 hours, preferably over a period of at least about 1 hour, to the concentrated solution. When MTBE is added, it can be added in about 17.5 to 22.5 parts, preferably in about 20 parts.

(22) The suspension can be cooled to a temperature of about −15 to −30° C., preferably to about −20 to −25° C.

(23) The suspension is filtered and the filtercake rinsed with an organic solvent, such as ethers, including methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE), diethyl ether, or diisopropyl ether. After filtration is complete and the cake is rinsed, the material is then dried in a vacuum oven at a temperature not exceeding about 60° C., for example, from about 45 to 60° C.

(24) When prepared using formic acid as the solvent, the resulting product, mesoporphyrin IX, is precipitated out as a formate salt; this is the preferred form for isolation of the mesoporphyrin IX after the hydrogenation step. After additional purification steps, the mesoporphyrin IX formate is converted into a hydrochloride salt. This step provides a further purification of the intermediate. In addition, the presence of proton scavengers such as formate (or other organic anions, such as acetate) during the subsequent tin insertion step has been shown to result in higher levels of impurities than if such scavengers are excluded. Accordingly, it is preferred to replace the formate anion of mesoporphyrin IX formate with an anion less capable of scavenging protons or buffering the solution during the tin insertion step; such anions include chloride and other halide anions such as bromide or iodide.

(25) When the intermediate isolated from the hydrogenation step is mesoporphyrin IX formate, it is placed in a reaction vessel with diatomaceous earth, activated carbon, and formic acid, (for example, with about 10% w/w diatomaceous earth, about 20% w/w activated carbon, and about 10 parts formic acid) to undergo additional purification. The suspension is agitated at, for example, about 20 to 30° C., preferably at about 20 to 25° C., for about 1.5 to 2.5 hours. The suspension is then filtered, and the filtercake washed with formic acid, for example, about 5 parts of formic acid. The resulting filtrate solution is then concentrated down to about 5 to 6 parts volume. Another vessel is charged with purified water and 31% hydrochloric acid to prepare about 15 parts of approximately 1N hydrochloric acid. Approximately 6 parts of this HCl solution is transferred into the vessel containing about 6 parts of the filtrate, preferably at a temperature of about 20 to 25° C. and over a period of at least about 60 minutes. The solution is then seeded with mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride (available from earlier syntheses) and agitated, preferably for at least about 2 hours. The remaining 9 parts of 1N hydrochloric acid is transferred into the vessel under vigorous agitation, preferably over a period of at least 60 minutes. The suspension is then further agitated at about 20 to 30° C., preferably at about 20 to 25° C., for about 2 to 3 hours. It is then filtered, and rinsed with purified water. The product is dried on the filter under a stream of nitrogen.

(26) In earlier processes, the step above was carried out by re-dissolving solid mesoporphyrin IX formate in formic acid, and then adding the formic acid solution to the hydrochloric acid in order to convert the mesoporphyrin IX formate to the mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride. However, filtration of the mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride so produced was found to be quite slow on a pilot plant scale, requiring up to five days to complete, and the subsequent drying on the filter then took between about two to three weeks. An improvement in the process was developed; as described above, the 1N hydrochloric acid solution is added into the formic acid solution of mesoporphyrin IX formate. This has been discovered to result in mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride that can be filtered more rapidly. Addition of seed material can also be performed during the procedure, for example, at the beginning of the addition of the 1N HCl into the formic acid solution of mesoporphyrin IX formate, or during the addition of 1N HCl into the formic acid solution of mesoporphyrin IX formate, such as when about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, about 50%, about 60%, about 70%, about 80%, or about 90% of the 1N HCl has been added to the formic acid solution of mesoporphyrin IX formate. Preferably, as in the process as described immediately above, the seed material is added after 40% of the 1N HCl has been added to the formic acid solution of mesoporphyrin IX formate. The addition of the seed material can also aid in the formation of a product which can be filtered more quickly. Since the mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride resulting from these process improvements can be filtered much more quickly, on the order of hours or even minutes instead of days, significant savings in time and cost are achieved. Thus, in another embodiment, the time for filtration of at least about 10 grams of mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride is reduced to less than about 90 minutes, less than about 60 minutes, less than about 45 minutes, less than about 35 minutes, less than about 25 minutes, or less than about 10 minutes. In a further embodiment, the time for filtration of at least about 1000 grams of mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride is reduced to less than about 1 day less than about 12 hours, less than about 6 hours, less than about 4 hours, less than about 3 hours, or less than about 2 hours.

(27) ##STR00003##
Conversion Mesoporphyrin IX Hydrochloride to Stannsoporfin (Tin (IV) Mesoporphyrin IX) Via Treatment with Tin (II) Salt

(28) The mesoporphyrin IX hydrochloride is then treated with a tin(II) salt, such as SnCl.sub.2 in an organic solvent, such as acetic acid, under oxidizing conditions, which yields the desired product, tin (IV) mesoporphyrin IX dichloride (stannsoporfin). For example, mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride and tin (II) chloride are placed in a vessel, and acetic acid is added at about 20 to 30° C., preferably at about 20 to 25° C. The suspended reagents are agitated for at least about 30 minutes. With vigorous agitation, the mixture is warmed under an inert atmosphere (such as nitrogen or argon) to reflux.

(29) ##STR00004##

(30) Once reflux has commenced, an atmosphere of approximately 6% oxygen in nitrogen is introduced into the headspace of the vessel. The gas can be from about 3% to about 22% oxygen; about 6% is preferred to minimize explosion hazards. The mixture is kept at reflux for about 100 to 130 hours. The use of the 6% oxygen in nitrogen atmosphere in the headspace instead of sparging or bubbling the gas mixture through the liquid has been found to be advantageous for increasing the yield of tin (IV) mesoporphyrin IX dichloride. Tin (II) can enter the porphyrin ring to complex with the nitrogens, and can also leave the porphyrin ring. However, tin (IV) which is not already bound to the nitrogens of the porphyrin ring cannot enter the ring to complex with the nitrogens. In order to generate tin (IV) mesoporphyrin IX, the tin (II) ion must enter the porphyrin ring, and then undergo oxidation to tin (IV) in situ. Excessively rapid oxidation of the tin (II) ion will cause the insertion reaction to stall, which can lower yields significantly. Accordingly, proper control of the rate of oxidation is needed. Introducing oxygen into the mixture via the interface between the solvent and the oxygen/nitrogen headspace atmosphere provides this control and leads to a reasonable rate of reaction with a good yield of final product.

(31) The reaction mixture can optionally be sampled during the tin insertion step by lowering the temperature to about 50 to 70° C., preferably about 55 to 60° C., removing a sample, and returning the reaction to reflux.

(32) After the tin insertion step, the reaction mixture is cooled, and WFI (water for injection) grade water is added. The suspension is then filtered, and the filter cake washed with WFI water. The filter cake is then placed under vacuum for a minimum of 4 hours to remove residual water.

(33) Conversion of Mesoporphyrin IX Dihydrochloride to Stannsoporfin (Tin (IV) Mesoporphyrin IX) Via Treatment with Tin (II) Oxide

(34) ##STR00005##

(35) Tin can also be inserted into the mesoporphyrin IX ring via treatment of mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride with tin (II) oxide. This reaction can proceed to completion in as short a time as two hours, compared to the four days to three weeks required for tin insertion using the tin (II) salt method described above. A solution/suspension mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride in a suitable solvent, for example, formic acid or acetic acid, is added to a solution/suspension of tin (II) oxide in a suitable solvent, for example, acetic acid or formic acid. An exemplary procedure is described below, and also in the Examples.

(36) The mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride is dissolved/suspended in formic acid at ambient temperature. As the solution or suspension will have a deep purple color, it is advantageous to pulverize the mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride into as fine a powder as possible to aid in dissolution.

(37) The tin (II) oxide is suspended in acetic acid at ambient temperature and stirred. After prolonged stirring, the tin oxide suspension may transform into a gel, which was not observed to affect the reaction adversely. The gel breaks up once the addition of mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride commences. The amount of tin (II) oxide is about two equivalents to about six equivalents per equivalent of mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride; preferably, about four equivalents of tin (II) oxide are used per equivalent of mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride. (In this reaction, the equivalent ratio is the same as the molar ratio.)

(38) The tin (II) oxide solution is maintained at a temperature of about 25-115° C., preferably about 50-75° C., more preferably about 60-65° C. The solution of mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride is then added over a period of about three to nine hours, preferably over a period of about six hours. The solution of mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride can be at ambient temperature during the addition, or can be maintained at a temperature of about 50-75° C., such as about 60-65° C., during addition. The reaction mixture is maintained at about 25-115° C., preferably about 50-75° C., more preferably about 60-65° C., for about an additional 2 to 48 hours, preferably about an additional 16 to 30 hours, more preferably about an additional 18 to 24 hours, such as about an additional 18 hours or about an additional 24 hours. After the additional reaction time, the suspension is cooled to room temperature (about 20-25° C.), agitated or stirred for at least about five minutes, preferably at least about one hour, and filtered.

(39) General Metal Insertion into Porphyrins Using Metal Oxides

(40) The procedure used for tin insertion into porphyrin rings using metal oxides can also be applied to insertion of other metals using metal oxides. Particularly useful metal oxides are metal oxides where the metal cation of the metal oxide is in an intermediate oxidation state. The procedure can be used for porphyrin compounds or salts thereof, including, but not limited to, a mesoporphyrin or a salt thereof, mesoporphyrin IX or a salt thereof, mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride, a protoporphyrin or a salt thereof, a hematoporphyrin or a salt thereof, or a deuteroporphyrin or a salt thereof, to yield the metallated porphyrin compound (or a salt thereof).

(41) Metal oxides which can be used include, but are not limited to, tin oxide, zinc oxide, copper oxide, cadmium oxide, cobalt oxide, chromium oxide, iron oxide, aluminum oxide, titanium oxide, nickel oxide, manganese oxide, silver oxide, gold oxide, vanadium oxide, platinum oxide, antimony oxide, arsenic oxide, tin (II) oxide, zinc (II) oxide, copper (I) oxide, copper (II) oxide, cadmium (II) oxide, cobalt (II) oxide, cobalt (II) oxide, cobalt (IV) oxide, Co.sub.3O.sub.4, chromium (II) oxide, chromium (III) oxide, chromium (IV) oxide, chromium (V) oxide, chromium (VI) oxide, iron (II) oxide, iron (III) oxide, Fe.sub.3O.sub.4, aluminum (III) oxide, titanium (II) oxide, titanium (III) oxide, titanium (IV) oxide, nickel (II) oxide, manganese (II) oxide, manganese (III) oxide, manganese (IV) oxide, manganese (VII) oxide, silver (I) oxide, silver (II) oxide, gold (I) oxide, gold (III) oxide, vanadium (II) oxide, vanadium (III) oxide, vanadium (IV) oxide, vanadium (V) oxide, platinum (II) oxide, platinum (IV) oxide, antimony (III) oxide, antimony (IV) oxide, antimony (V) oxide, arsenic (III) oxide, or arsenic (V) oxide.

(42) Other porphyrin compounds and tetrapyrroles can also be metallated using the procedures described herein, including, but not limited to, porphyrins such as deuteroporphyrins and deuteroporphyrin IX 2,4-bis(ethylene glycol) (8,13-bis(1,2-dihydroxyethyl)-3,7,12,17-tetramethyl-21H,23H-porphine-2,18-dipropionic acid). Additional porphyrin compounds which can be metallated using the procedures described herein include, but are not limited to, coproporphyrins, cytoporphyrins, etioporphyrins, hematoporphyrins, mesoporphyrins, phylloporphyrins, protoporphyrins, pyrroporphyrins, rhodoporphyrins, uroporphyrins, and phytoporphyrins. A comprehensive listing of porphyrin compounds is given at World-Wide-Web.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iupac/tetrapyrrole/; the porphyrins described therein are hereby incorporated by reference herein as porphyrins which can be metallated using the procedures described herein.

(43) Purification of Tin (IV) Mesoporphyrin IX Dichloride: Hot Acid Trituration

(44) At this point, the crude tin (IV) mesoporphyrin IX dichloride is then triturated with hot acid in order to remove impurities. The material is re-suspended in hydrochloric acid (approximately 0.5 N to 2.0 N, preferably 1 N) and the temperature raised to about 75 to 100° C. or about 80 to 100° C., preferably about 85 to 95° C., more preferably to about 85 to 90° C., for about one to two hours with moderate agitation. The suspension is then cooled to about 20 to 30° C., preferably to about 20 to 25° C., and filtered; the filtercake is rinsed with purified water and dried on the filter under a nitrogen stream.

(45) Purification Tin (IV) Mesoporphyrin IX Dichloride: Treatment at High pH

(46) The material from the hot acid trituration step is combined with diatomaceous earth, activated carbon, water, and ammonium hydroxide. The temperature is adjusted to about 20 to 30° C., preferably to about 20 to 25° C., and agitated, preferably for about 1 to 2 hours. A sample is taken to ensure that the pH is at or above approximately 9. The mixture is then agitated, preferably for about 1 to 2 hours further. The mixture is then filtered. Any material remaining on the filter is rinsed with water; the filtercake is then discarded.

(47) Re-Acidification of Tin (IV) Mesoporphyrin IX Dichloride

(48) The filtrate is then transferred into a mixture of acetic acid and 31% hydrochloric acid, and the mixture is adjusted to about 20 to 30° C., preferably to about 20 to 25° C. The resultant suspension is agitated, preferably for about 15 minutes, sampled to ensure that the pH is less than or equal to about 1, and then agitated again, preferably for about an additional 1 to 2 hours. The suspension is then filtered, and the filtercake rinsed with water, followed by removal of residual water under vacuum.

(49) At this stage, the filtercake is sampled for residual starting material, mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride. If the level is above about 0.1%, the high pH treatment followed by re-acidification is repeated as necessary (for example, an addition 1, 2, or 3 times).

(50) Additional Hot Acid Trituration of Tin (IV) Mesoporphyrin IX Dichloride

(51) The filtercake from the previous step is re-suspended in a mixture of approximately two parts by weight WFI grade water and approximately one part by weight 31% HCl, at about 20 to 30° C., preferably at about 20 to 25° C. Under moderate agitation, the mixture is adjusted to about 80 to 100° C., preferably to about 85 to 90° C., for about 6 to 48 hours, preferably about 12 to 24 hours, more preferably about 16 to 18 hours, followed by cooling to about 20 to 30° C., preferably to about 20 to 25° C., for at least about 1 hour. The suspension is filtered, the filtercake rinsed with an aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid (for example, about 1 part 31% HCl to 25 parts WFI grade water, w/w), and dried under a stream of nitrogen (at or below about 50° C.).

(52) The final hot acid treatment serves in order to re-set the form of the stannsoporfin to monomer. In neutral solution, stannsoporfin is in a monomer-dimer equilibrium; treatment with strong acid shifts the equilibrium strongly to the monomer form.

(53) Development work on the stannsoporfin synthesis indicates that for optimum results, the hydrogenation catalyst should be pre-hydrogenated prior to introduction of the hemin starting material; the isolation of the mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride from the mesoporphyrin IX formate in formic acid should proceed by addition of the HCl solution to the formic acid solution; the presence of proton scavengers should be avoided during the tin insertion step; and the introduction of the oxygen during the tin insertion step should proceed via introduction of the oxygen/nitrogen mixture to the headspace of the reaction, rather than bubbling or sparging of the gas through the solution. With these optimum parameters in mind, other variables such as temperature, reaction time, reagent concentration, and order of reagent addition can be manipulated to some extent, for example, concentration and reaction time can be varied within about 50 to 200% of the values indicated, or within about 75 to 150% of the values indicated, and temperature can be varied about 5 to 10° C. of the values indicated, to the extent that the variation does not result in large-scale synthesis of stannsoporfin at less than high purity as defined herein. Purification and precipitation steps can be repeated as necessary in order to maintain high purity of the large scale preparation of stannsoporfin.

(54) Therapeutic Use of Stannsoporfin for Treatment or Prevention of Infant Hyperbilirubinemia and Other Diseases

(55) Stannsoporfin as produced by the invention can be used for treatment or prevention of infant hyperbilirubinemia (infant jaundice) (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,657,902; 4,668,670; and WO 94/28906). Additional methods of using stannsoporfin are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,692,440 (to increase the rate of heme excretion), WO 89/02269 (to counteract the toxicity of cancer therapy), U.S. Pat. No. 4,782,049 (to treat psoriasis), and other publications. Treatment or prevention of infant hyperbilirubinemia is accomplished by dissolving the stannsoporfin in a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle. The stannsoporfin is preferably provided in a solution which can be buffered to maintain a suitable pH. Buffers which can be used include phosphate, citrate, gluconate, lactate, tartrate, glycinate, glycylglycinate, bicarbonate, carbonate, maleate, or acetate, with sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, or aluminum present as the cation. Histidine and imidazole can also be used as buffers. Phosphate buffers are preferred, particularly sodium phosphate buffer. Buffers must be pharmaceutically acceptable for use as an injectable agent in neonates. The pH of the solution for administration is preferably between about 7.0 to 8.0, more preferably about 7.2 to 7.9, still more preferably about 7.4. The osmolarity of the solution is preferably a or near physiological osmolarity; a preferred range is between about 280 mOsm/L and 310 mOsm/L. Stannsoporfin is preferably administered by injection, more preferably by intramuscular injection. The stannsoporfin is administered in an amount sufficient to treat or prevent infant hyperbilirubinemia, typically about 4.5 mg/kg birthweight; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/867,581 filed on Oct. 4, 2007, and International (Patent Cooperation Treaty) Patent Application No. PCT/US07/021486 filed on Oct. 4, 2007, both of which claim priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/849,509, filed on Oct. 4, 2006, disclose a method of treating infant hyperbilirubinemia using lower doses of stannsoporfin, such as 1.5 mg/kg birthweight or 3.0 mg/kg birthweight.

(56) U.S. Pat. No. 6,818,763, U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/0210048, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/096,359 are specifically hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

(57) The following examples are intended to illustrate the invention, and are not intended to limit the invention in any manner.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Exemplary Synthesis of High-Purity Stannsoporfin

(58) Initial Conversion of Hemin to Mesoporphyrin IX

(59) A 200 L glass lined vessel, pressure-rated to 150 psi, is charged with 0.6 kg of 5% palladium on carbon and 73 kg of formic acid. With vigorous agitation, the reactor is pressurized with hydrogen to 60-65 psi and warmed to 40-45° C. for a minimum of 12 hours. With moderate agitation, the reaction is cooled to 20-25° C., the hydrogen atmosphere is evacuated, and the reactor charged with 6.0 kg of hemin (DMF grade) and 73 kg formic acid. The reactor is pressurized to 30-35 psi with hydrogen and agitated at 20-25° C. for 30 minutes.

(60) With vigorous agitation the reaction is warmed to 85-90° C. Hydrogen pressure is then increased to 55-60 psi. The pressure and temperature are maintained for a period of 1-1.5 hours.

(61) The reaction is cooled to 45-50° C. and the hydrogenation is continued at 55-60 psi for 24 hours. The reaction is then cooled to 20-25° C., depressurized and sampled.

(62) The reaction is warmed to 45-50° C., pressurized to 55-60 psi with hydrogen, and agitated a further 6 hours. The reaction is then cooled to 20-25° C., depressurized and sampled again.

(63) Hydrogen is evacuated from the vessel, which is then charged with 3.0 kg HYFLO SUPERCEL, 2.3 kg DARCO KB and 42 kg formic acid. The suspension is filtered, and the filter cake is rinsed with 122 kg formic acid.

(64) A portion of the filtrate is transferred to a 200 L glass lined vessel, cooled to 10-15° C. and distilled under vacuum to remove formic acid. Once the residual volume has dropped to 25-35 L, the remainder of the filtrate is transferred in and distillation continued to a residual volume of 25-30 L.

(65) The reaction to temperature is adjusted to 20-25° C. and 89 kg of methyl tert-butyl ether is added over a minimum of 1 hour. The resultant suspension is agitated at 20-25° C. for 2 hours prior to cooling to −25 to −20° C. for a period of 4 hours.

(66) The suspension is filtered and rinsed with 12 kg of methyl tert-butyl ether. The intermediate product is dried in a vacuum oven at 60° C. or less.

(67) Purification of Mesoporphyrin IX Formate with Diatomaceous Earth and Activated Carbon; Conversion of Mesoporphyrin IX Formate to Mesoporphyrin IX Dihydrochloride

(68) The intermediate is transferred to a 50 L glass lined vessel with 10% w/w DARCO KB, 20% w/w HYFLO SUPERCEL and 10 parts formic acid. The suspension is agitated at 20-25° C. for a period of 1.5-2.5 hours.

(69) The suspension is filtered into a second 50 L glass lined vessel. The filtercake is rinsed with 5 parts formic acid and discarded. The filtrate solution is vacuum distilled to a residual volume of 5-6 parts.

(70) A third vessel is clamed with purified water and 31% hydrochloric acid to prepare 15 parts of 1N hydrochloric acid. Six parts of the filtrate solution is transferred into the reactor at 20-25° C. over a minimum of 60 minutes.

(71) The solution is seeded with mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride and agitated for a minimum of 2 hours. With vigorous agitation, the remaining 9 parts of 1N hydrochloric acid is transferred into the vessel over a minimum of 1 hour.

(72) The resultant suspension is agitated at 20-25° C. for a period of 2-3 hours prior to isolation by filtration. The filtercake is rinsed with 4 parts of purified water. The intermediate product mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride is dried on the filter under a stream of nitrogen.

(73) Conversion Mesoporphyrin IX Dihydrochloride to Tin (IV) Mesoporphyrin IX Dihydrochloride (Stannsoporfin)

(74) A 50 L glass lined vessel is charged with 1.57 kg of mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride, 1.862 kg of tin (II) chloride, and 40.9 kg acetic acid at 20-25° C. With moderate agitation, the suspension is maintained at 20-25° C. for a minimum of 30 minutes.

(75) With vigorous agitation, under nitrogen, the mixture is warmed to reflux (ca. 115° C.). Once reflux has been attained, a 6% oxygen in nitrogen atmosphere is introduced to the headspace of the vessel. The reaction mixture is maintained at reflux for a period of 100-130 hours.

(76) The reaction mixture is cooled to 55-60° C. and sampled for residual mesoporphyrin; while awaiting results, the reaction mixture is warmed back to reflux. Once complete, the reaction is cooled to 60-70° C. and charged with 15.7 kg of WFI (water for injection) grade water. The temperature of the suspension is adjusted to 20-25° C. over 30 minutes and agitated for a period of 1 hour.

(77) The suspension is filtered, and the vessel and cake are rinsed with 6.3 kg of WFI water. Upon completion of the wash, the cake is placed under vacuum for a minimum of 4 hours to remove residual water.

(78) A 50 L glass lined vessel is charged with the wet filtercake, 22.4 kg purified water, and 3.7 kg 31% hydrochloric acid at 20-25° C. With moderate agitation, the temperature of the mixture is adjusted to 85-90° C. for a period of 1-2 hours, followed by cooling to 20-25° C. The suspension was filtered and the filtercake rinsed with 6.3 kg purified water. The product is dried on the filter under a stream of nitrogen and packaged.

(79) Purification of Tin (IV) Mesoporphyrin IX Dichloride (Stannsoporfin) at High pH with Diatomaceous Earth and Activated Carbon

(80) A 50 L glass lined vessel is charged with 1.448 kg of tin (IV) mesoporphyrin IX dichloride, 0.194 kg HYFLO SUPERCEL, 0.066 kg DARCO KB, 14.5 kg WFI water, and 1.0 kg ammonium hydroxide 26 Be. The temperature of the reaction mixture is adjusted to 20-25° C. and agitated for a period of 1-2 hours. A sample is taken to verify that the pH is ≥9. The mixture is then agitated a further 1-2 hours. The mixture is filtered through into a glass receiver. The cake rinsed with 2.9 kg of water and discarded.

(81) A second 50 L glass lined vessel is charged with 38.2 kg of acetic acid and 2.6 kg of 31% HCl. The temperature is adjusted to 20-25° C. The filtrate from the glass receiver is transferred into the second 50 L vessel over a minimum of 45 minutes at 20-25° C. The glass receiver and transfer apparatus are rinsed with 2.1 kg WFI water into the vessel. The resultant suspension is agitated at 20-25° C. for 15 minutes prior to taking a sample to verify that the pH is ≤1. The suspension is then agitated a further 1-2 hours.

(82) The suspension is filtered, and the vessel and cake are rinsed with 1.3 kg of WFI water. Upon completion of the wash, the cake is placed under vacuum for a minimum of 4 hours to remove residual water.

(83) A sample of the filtercake is taken for testing. If the residual starting material (mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride) is at an acceptable level, the reaction proceeds to the next step, otherwise the entire treatment is repeated (i.e., the filtercake is re-dissolved using ammonium hydroxide as above).

(84) Treatment of Tin (IV) Mesoporphyrin IX Dichloride (Stannsoporfin) at Low pH to Set to Monomer Form

(85) The wet filtercake is returned to the 50 L glass lined vessel which is then charged with 20.4 kg WFI water and 10.2 kg 31% hydrochloric acid at 20-25° C. With moderate agitation, the temperature of the mixture is adjusted to 85-90° C. for a period of 16-18 hours, followed by cooling to 20-25° C. for a minimum of 1 hour. The suspension is filtered and the filtercake rinsed with a pre-mixed solution of 0.5 kg 31% hydrochloric acid in 12.8 kg WFI water. The product is dried on the filter at <50° C. under a stream of nitrogen and packaged.

Example 2

Alternative Tin Insertion Step Using Tin (II) Oxide as Tin Source

(86) The insertion of tin into mesoporphyrin IX to produce stannsoporfin can be carried out by an alternate synthetic route using tin (II) oxide as the reagent for tin introduction.

(87) A dark, 1000 ml, three-necked, round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirbar, Claisen head, addition funnel, thermometer, condenser, and nitrogen bubbler was charged with 8.4 g tin (II) oxide, and 200 ml acetic acid, at 20-25° C., to form a gray suspension. The suspension was warmed to 60-65° C. under nitrogen.

(88) A separate 250 ml one-neck, round-bottom flask equipped with a stirbar was charged with 10 g mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride, and 50 ml formic acid. The mixture was agitated at 20-25° C. for 30 minutes to effect dissolution, resulting in about 60 ml of a deep purple suspension solution at 20-25° C. (Because of the colored solution, complete dissolution is difficult to observe visually; the mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride should be thoroughly milled prior to formic acid addition.)

(89) The mesoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride solution was charged to the addition funnel and added dropwise to the tin (II) oxide/acetic acid suspension/solution over a period of 6 hours, while maintaining the temperature of the tin (II) oxide/acetic acid suspension/solution at 60-65° C. The volume in the flask increased from 200 ml to 260 ml; the appearance of the reaction changed from a gray suspension (or white gel), to a purple suspension, to a red suspension.

(90) Once the addition was complete, the reaction was agitated under nitrogen atmosphere at 60-65° C. for a further 18-24 hours. Then 100 ml water was added dropwise over 20-40 minutes, while maintaining the temperature at 60-65° C. The resultant red suspension (about 360 ml) was cooled to 20-25° C. over 30 minutes and agitated for a minimum of 1 hour, followed by filtration under reduced pressure (total filtration time was about 10-20 minutes). The filtercake was rinsed with two portions of 20 ml water. The filtrate volume of about 400 ml was a claret-colored solution; the filtercake mass of about 40-50 g was also claret-colored.

(91) The wet filtercake was carefully broken up into pieces and charged back into the reaction flask with 100 ml 1N HCl. The resultant claret-colored suspension was warmed to 85-95° C. for 1 hour. The suspension was then cooled to 20-25° C. and filtered under reduced pressure (total filtration time was about 20-30 minutes); the filtrate was dark claret to brown in color. The claret-colored filtercake was rinsed with two portions of 20 ml water, dried under a nitrogen stream, and further dried under high vacuum at 80-90° C. for 24 hours. In various repetitions of the synthesis, the yield of product varied from 16.5-21.2 g (70-90%).

Example 3

Analysis of High-Purity Stannsoporfin Made by Exemplary Synthesis Utilizing Tin (II) Chloride as Tin Source

(92) Batches of stannsoporfin were prepared using the exemplary synthesis essentially as outlined above in Example 1, as well as earlier methods (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,818,763 and US 2004/0210048).

(93) Basic HPLC analysis is performed using a C-18 column (Zorbax Extend C-18, 4.6×150 mm, 3.5 um particle size, or the equivalent). The detector is set at 400 nm. Solvents (acetonitrile, methanol, and water) are HPLC grade. The mobile phase is 16% acetonitrile:40% methanol:44% 0.5M ammonium acetate, pH 5.15. (The ammonium acetate solution is prepared by dissolving 38.5 g ammonium acetate in 440 mL H.sub.2O, and adjusting the pH to 5.15 with acetic acid. Both the ammonium acetate and acetic acid are reagent grade. 160 mL acetonitrile and 400 mL methanol are then added; the mobile phase solution is mixed, filtered, and degassed prior to use.) The flow rate is 1.0 ml/minute. Samples and standards of stannsoporfin are prepared for injection at a concentration of 0.04 mg/mL in 1N NaOH. As stannsoporfin and related compounds are light sensitive, solutions containing stannsoporfin, starting materials, or impurity standards should be kept in opaque containers, and handling and analysis should be conducted under reduced light conditions. Samples and standard solutions should be used within 12 hours of preparation. 5 uL of analyte solution is injected, and a 10-minute run time is used. The retention time of stannsoporfin is typically about 4.8 minutes. The column temperature is maintained at 60° C. After analysis, the column is washed with 80% methanol and 20% water for at least 1 hour at 1.0 mL/min.

(94) HPLC analysis for quantitation of impurities is performed using an ACE 5 C-18 column, 4.6×250 mm, 5 um particle size, with detection at 400 nm. Protection of light-sensitive samples and standards is practiced as described above. The mobile phases used are A: 30% methanol, 70% water with 0.02M ammonium acetate, pH 9.1, and B: 80% methanol, 20% water with 0.02M ammonium acetate, pH 9.1 (mobile phase A is prepared by dissolving 3.0 g of ammonium acetate in 1400 mL water, adjusting pH to 9.1 with NH.sub.4OH, and adding 600 mL methanol; mobile phase B is prepared by dissolving 3.0 g of ammonium acetate in 400 mL water, adjusting pH to 9.1 with NH.sub.4OH, and adding 1600 mL methanol; mobile phases are mixed, filtered, and degassed prior to use). Samples are dissolved in 0.5% v/v TEA in water at a concentration of approximately 0.2 mg/mL. Samples and standard solutions should be used within 12 hours of preparation.

(95) The analysis is performed using the following gradient conditions:

(96) TABLE-US-00001 Time % A % B 0 100 0 50 70 30 65 70 30 90 0 100 110 0 100 111 100 0 120 100 0
where the concentrations are changed linearly between the points shown.

(97) Table 1 contains a comparison of the HPLC analysis of the product of the current synthesis, column C, as compared to analyses of products from earlier syntheses in column A and column B. Peaks detected are listed in order of retention time relative to stannsoporfin, with the retention time of stannsoporfin set to 1. The batch analyzed in column A was produced in a quantity of 1.1 kg; the batch analyzed in column C was also produced in a quantity of 1.1 kg.

(98) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1 Analysis of various preparations of stannsoporfin Relative Retention Time A B C 0.33 0.06% 0.51 0.05% 0.05% 0.07% 0.55 0.06% 0.73 0.14% 0.05% 0.05% 0.76 0.07% 0.05% 0.83 0.05% 0.84 0.05% 0.92 0.26% 0.06% 0.95 0.30% 0.05% 0.96 0.22% 1   98%   99%  100% 1.05 0.09% 1.26 0.06%
As seen from Table 1, the current stannsoporfin synthesis in column C resulted in material which resulted in a high purity product, of overall purity >99% and which does not contain any impurities at or above 0.1%.

Example 4

Analysis of High-Purity Stannsoporfin Made by Exemplary Synthesis Utilizing Tin (II) Oxide as Tin Source

(99) Three batches of stannsoporfin were made using the tin insertion step as described in Example 2. Analysis of the three batches indicated that the purity of stannsoporfin produced was 99.7%, 99.7%, and 99.6% (total content of stannsoporfin was 96.4%, 99.1%, and 97.2%, respectively).

(100) HPLC analysis was performed on a Zorbax Extend C-18 column, 4.6×150 mm, 5 μm thickness. The eluents used were: A: 80% 0.05 M Ammonium Acetate, pH 5.15 with Acetic Acid: 20% Acetonitrile; B: 90% Methanol: 10% Acetonitrile. The temperature used was 40° C. A flow rate of 1.2 ml/min was used, with detection at 400 nm. The retention time of stannsoporfin was 8.8 min, while that of mesoporphyrin IX was 23.1 min, with use of the following gradient listed in Table 2.

(101) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2 Time A B 0.0 60 40 10.0 25 75 30.0 25 75 31.0 60 40 40.0 60 40

(102) More extensive analyses of two batches of stannsoporfin produced using the tin oxide insertion method were conducted. These analyses are detailed in Table 3 (batch weight 0.840 kg) and Table 4 (batch weight 1.364 kg) below (where a/a indicates ratio of area of HPLC peaks).

(103) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 3 Test Method Results Total Purity HPLC Total impurities < 1% a/a; impurity at RRt 0.72 = 0.06% a/a; no other impurity > 0.05%, a/a Water Content Karl Fischer, Trace < 1% w/w coulometic Residual Solvents- Chromatographic Not detected < Acetone (GC-headspace) 0.1% w/w Organic content-formic HPLC 0.1% w/w acid + acetic acid Inorganic content- Inductively coupled Pd = 5 ppm palladium and iron plasma-optical Fe = 5 ppm emission spectroscopy Inorganic content- Differential Pulse <0.1% free tin free tin Polarography Inorganic content-tin Inductively coupled 144500 ppm plasma-optical emission spectroscopy Inorganic content- Elemental analysis 104100 ppm chloride

(104) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Test Method Results Total Purity HPLC Total impurities < 1% a/a; impurity at RRt 0.72 = 0.06% a/a; no other impurity > 0.05% a/a Water Content Karl Fischer, Trace <1% w/w coulometric Residual Solvents- Chromatographic Not detected < Acetone (GC-headspace) 0.1% w/w Organic content-formic HPLC Not detected < acid + acetic acid 0.1% w/w Inorganic content- Inductively coupled Pd = 5 ppm palladium and iron plasma-optical Fe = 67 ppm emission spectroscopy Inorganic content- Differential Pulse <0.1% free tin free tin Polarography Inorganic content-tin Inductively coupled 165000 ppm plasma-optical emission spectroscopy Inorganic content- Elemental analysis 103300 ppm chloride

Example 5

Stability of High-Purity Stannsoporfin Preparations

(105) The long-term stability of the compound was studied under two different storage conditions: 25° C. (+/−2° C.) and 60% relative humidity (+/−5%); and 40° C. (+/−2° C.) and 75% relative humidity (+/−5%). Primary packaging for the compound was a 4-mil polyethylene bag and secondary packaging for the compound was a 4 mil polyethylene bag, stored in an HDPE drum.

(106) Table 5 and Table 6 show stability data for the batch described in Table 3, under the 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH conditions, respectively. Table 7 and Table 8 show stability data for the batch described in Table 4 under the 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH conditions, respectively. Data for the zero-month time point was taken from the batch release analysis (the zero time point represents the actual date when samples were placed in the stability test chambers). The samples were analyzed at approximately 3 months and approximately 6 months after the samples were placed under the storage conditions.

(107) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 5 Test 0 months 3 months 6 months Appearance Red powder free Red powder free Red powder free from visual from visual from visual evidence of evidence of evidence of contamination contamination contamination HPLC purity (total 0.3 0.22 0.24 impurities) HPLC purity (impurity  0.06% <0.05% 0.07% peak at RRt retention time 0.72-0.73) HPLC assay (w/w, 100.7%   99.8% 98.4% solvent-free anhydrous basis) HPLC assay (w/w as 100.4%   99.6% 98.2% is) Water content (Karl Trace < 1% <1% (0.1%) <1% (0.1%) Fischer, coulometric)

(108) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 6 Test 0 months 3 months 6 months Appearance Red powder free Red powder free Red powder free from visual from visual from visual evidence of evidence of evidence of contamination contamination contamination HPLC purity (total 03 0.28 0.26 impurities) HPLC purity (impurity  0.06%  <0.05% 0.06% peak at RRt retention time 0.72-0.73) HPLC assay (w/w, 100.7%   101.2% 99.8% solvent-free anhydrous basis) HPLC assay (w/w 100.4%   100.9% 99.6% as is) Water content (Karl Trace <1% <1% (0.2%) <1% (0.1%) Fischer, coulometric)

(109) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 7 Test 0 months 3 months 6 months Appearance Red powder free Red powder free Red powder free from visual from visual from visual evidence of evidence of evidence of contamination contamination contamination HPLC parity (total 0.22 0.29 0.19 impurities) HPLC purity (impurity  0.06%  0.05% 0.05% peak at RRt retention time 0.72-0.73) HPLC assay (w/w, 102.3% 102.1% 98.5% solvent-free anhydrous basis) HPLC assay (w/w as 102.3% 102.0% 98.4% is) Water content (Karl Trace < 1% <1% (0.1%) <1% (0.1%) Fischer, coulometric)

(110) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 8 Test 0 months 3 months 6 months Appearance Red powder free Red powder free Red powder free from visual from visual from visual evidence of evidence of evidence of contamination contamination contamination HPLC purity (total 0.22 0.29 0.24 impurities) HPLC purity (impurity  0.06%  <0.05% 0.06% peak at RRt retention time 0.72-0.73) HPLC assay (w/w, 102.3%   101.1% 97.8% solvent-free anhydrous basis) HPLC assay (w/w as 102.3%   101.0% 97.7% is) Water content (Karl Trace < 1% <1% (0.1%) <1% (0.1%) Fischer, coulometric)

(111) The disclosures of all publications, patents, patent applications and published patent applications referred to herein by an identifying citation are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

(112) Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it is apparent to those skilled in the art that certain minor changes and modifications will be practiced. Therefore, the description and examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.