Trimmer Line for String Trimmers
20210235618 · 2021-08-05
Inventors
Cpc classification
Y10T428/2973
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
Abstract
A novel monofilament trimmer line is provided for reducing noise, reducing air drag and increasing durability by having a non-round cross-sectional shape defined as a polygon with three to six sides wherein the vertices between adjacent sides have been replaced with generous circular arcs, the arcs of a parabola, or even other arc shapes so long as the arc is convex and contains no sharp edges and wherein each arc is tangent to the two adjacent sides with a smooth and continuous transition, and the sides of the polygon are either straight or slightly convex, but not concave.
Claims
1. A trimmer line for use with a powered rotary trimmer device, comprising: a filament body having a non-circular cross-sectional shape comprising at least three distinct sides wherein each of the sides is straight or convex, the filament body having a longitudinal axis, wherein the filament body further comprises vertices equal in number to the number of the at least three distinct sides, the vertices being located where adjacent ones of the at least three distinct sides converge, each of the vertices comprising a convex arc contour, and wherein the filament body is fixedly twisted about its longitudinal axis.
2. The trimmer line of claim 1, wherein the filament body is fixedly twisted about its longitudinal axis at a rate of not more than one full 360 degree revolution of the filament body per 0.75 inches of the filament body.
3. The trimmer line of claim 1, wherein the filament body is fixedly twisted about its longitudinal axis at a rate of from 0.75 inches to 3.0 inches of the filament body per full 360 degree revolution of the filament body.
4. The trimmer line of claim 1, wherein each of the convex arc contours has a radius R, and the ratio of the radius (R) to the diameter of a circle capable of circumscribing the cross-sectional shape of the filament body (D) is within the range of 0.05 to 0.30, and wherein the filament body is fixedly twisted about its longitudinal axis at a rate of between 0.75 inches to 3.0 inches of the filament body per full 360 degree revolution of the filament body.
5. The trimmer line of claim 3, wherein the filament body is fixedly twisted about its longitudinal axis at a rate of between 1.6 and 1.7 inches of the filament body per full 360 degree revolution of the filament body.
6. The trimmer line of claim 4, wherein the filament body is fixedly twisted about its longitudinal axis at a rate of between about 1.6 to 1.7 inches of the filament body per full 360 degree revolution of the filament body.
7. The trimmer line of claim 1, wherein each of the at least three distinct sides comprises a convex contour.
8. The trimmer line of claim 7, wherein each of the convex contours does not exceed 50% of the distance between the cross-sectional shape side and a circle circumscribing the cross-sectional shape of the filament body when measured at a mid-point of the side.
9. The trimmer line of claim 8, wherein each of the convex contours is 33% of the distance between the cross-sectional shape side and the circle circumscribing the cross-sectional shape of the filament body when measured at a mid-point of the side.
10. The trimmer line of claim 1, wherein each of the at least three distinct sides of the cross-sectional shape are free of convex grooves.
11. A string trimmer line comprising: a monofilament body having a non-circular cross-sectional shape comprising three, four, five, or six distinct sides wherein each of the sides is straight or convex, the filament body having a longitudinal axis, wherein the filament body further comprises vertices equal in number to the number of the distinct sides, the vertices being located where adjacent ones of the distinct sides converge, each of the vertices and comprising a convex arc contour, wherein the filament body is fixedly twisted about its longitudinal axis at a rate of from 1.6 inches to 1.7 inches of the filament body per full 360 degree revolution of the filament body, and wherein the string trimmer line is configured for use with a powered rotary trimmer device for cutting grass, weeds, and vegetation.
12. The string trimmer line of claim 11, wherein each of the convex arc contours has a radius R, and the ratio of the radius (R) to the diameter of a circle capable of circumscribing the cross-sectional shape of the filament body (D) is from 0.05 to 0.3.
13. The string trimmer line of claim 11, wherein each of the convex arc contours has a radius R, and the ratio of the radius (R) to the diameter of a circle capable of circumscribing the cross-sectional shape of the filament body (D) is 0.2.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0035] The cross-sectional shapes of the twist trimmer lines of this invention consist of polygons with three to six sides, with a generous radius at the vertices between each of the two adjacent sides. The sides of the polygons can range from generally flat (
[0036]
[0037]
0.05≤R.sub.1/D.sub.1≤0.30
[0038] In
[0039] The value of diameter (D.sub.1) circumscribing the fibers depicted in
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1A Theoretical Values for Twisted Square Cross- Sections with Various Radii (R.sub.1) FIG. 2f 2e 2d 2c 2b 2a la D.sub.1 (mm) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 R.sub.1/D.sub.1 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 R.sub.1 (mm) 0.72 0.6 0.5 0.36 0.24 0.12 0 Y.sub.1 (mm) 0.14 0.18 0.21 0.25 0.28 0.32 0.35 Area.sub.1 (mm).sup.2 4.05 3.89 3.78 3.53 3.33 3.12 2.89 Area.sub.1/Area.sub.0 0.92 0.86 0.83 0.78 0.74 0.69 0.64
[0040] In TABLE 1A, the length of the midpoint of each side radially outward to the circle circumscribing the shape has been labeled as Y.sub.1. The radius (R.sub.1) in mm has been calculated by multiplying the diameter (D.sub.1) by the ratio R.sub.1/D.sub.1 shown in the table. The Area.sub.1 was calculated based upon the geometry and the other values shown in TABLE 1A. The final row of values in TABLE 1A is a ratio of the cross-sectional area of the invention (Area.sub.1) divided by the cross-sectional area of a round fiber with the same diameter as D.sub.1 (Area.sub.0).
[0041] TABLE 1A can be read as follows: The cross-section of the twisted fiber in
[0042] It is important to note that the area of the trimmer lines (fibers) in TABLE 1A approach the area of a solid round circle as the radii (R.sub.1) is increased. More area equates to more mass which will improve the fiber's durability and useful life. However, these fibers retain their benefits of reduced noise generation and reduced drag. Additionally, all of the fibers of the invention listed in TABLE 1A have larger cross-sectional areas than the cross-section area of the fiber listed in
[0043]
0.05≤R.sub.1/D.sub.1≤0.30
[0044] In
[0045] The value of diameter (D.sub.1) circumscribing the fibers depicted in
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2A Theoretical Values for Twisted Triangular Cross-Sections with Various Radii (R.sub.1) FIG. 3f 3e 3d 3c 3b 3a 1b D.sub.1 (mm) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 R.sub.1/D.sub.1 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 R.sub.1 (mm) 0.72 0.6 0.5 0.36 0.24 0.12 0 Y.sub.1 (mm) 0.24 0.3 0.35 0.42 0.48 0.54 0.6 Area.sub.1 (mm).sup.2 3.72 3.47 3.24 2.9 2.58 2.33 1.88 Area.sub.1/Area.sub.0 0.82 0.77 0.72 0.64 0.57 0.52 0.42
[0046] In TABLE 2A, the length of the midpoint of each side radially outward to the circle circumscribing the shape has been labeled as Y.sub.1. The radius (R.sub.1) in mm has been calculated by multiplying the diameter (D.sub.1) by the ratio R.sub.1/D.sub.1 shown in the table. The Area.sub.1 was calculated based upon the geometry and the other values shown in TABLE 2A. The final row of values in TABLE 2A is a ratio of the cross-sectional area of the invention (Area.sub.1) divided by the cross-sectional area of a round fiber with the same diameter as D.sub.1 (Area.sub.0).
[0047] TABLE 2A can be read as follows: The cross-section of the twisted fiber in
[0048]
0.05≤R.sub.1/D.sub.1≤0.30
[0049] In
[0050] The value of diameter (D.sub.1) circumscribing the fibers depicted in
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3A Theoretical Values for Twisted Pentagonal Cross-Sections with Various Radii (R.sub.1) FIG. 4f 4e 4d 4c 4b 4a 1c D.sub.1 (mm) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 R.sub.1/D.sub.1 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 R.sub.1 (mm) 0.72 0.6 0.5 0.36 0.24 0.12 0 Y.sub.1 (mm) 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.16 0.18 0.21 0.23 Area.sub.1 (mm).sup.2 4.20 4.10 4.00 3.86 3.73 3.59 3.43 Area.sub.1/Area.sub.0 0.93 0.91 0.88 0.85 0.83 0.79 0.76
[0051] In TABLE 3A, the length of the midpoint of each side radially outward to the circle circumscribing the shape has been labeled as Y.sub.1. The radius (R.sub.1) in mm has been calculated by multiplying the diameter (D.sub.1) by the ratio R.sub.1/D.sub.1 shown in the table. The Area.sub.1 was calculated based upon the geometry and the other values shown in TABLE 3A. The final row of values in TABLE 3A is a ratio of the cross-sectional area of the invention (Area.sub.1) divided by the cross-sectional area of a round fiber with the same diameter as D.sub.1 (Area.sub.0).
[0052] TABLE 3A can be read as follows: The cross-section of the twisted fiber in
[0053] Again, it is notable that as the radius R.sub.1 is increased, the area of the monofilament fiber (invention) approaches the area of a round fiber (standard trimmer line) of the same circumscribing diameter. Whereas the area of the twisted square invented by Behrendt had 64% of the area of a circumscribed circle of the same diameter, the example depicted by
[0054]
0.05≤R.sub.1/D.sub.1≤0.30
[0055] In
[0056] The value of diameter (D.sub.1) circumscribing the fibers depicted in
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4A Theoretical Values for Twisted Hexagonal Cross-Sections with Various Radii (R.sub.1) FIG. 5f 5e 5d 5c 5b 5a 1d D.sub.1 (mm) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 R.sub.1/D.sub.1 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 R.sub.1 (mm) 0.72 0.6 0.5 0.36 0.24 0.12 0 Y.sub.1 (mm) 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.14 0.16 Area.sub.1 (mm).sup.2 4.29 4.22 4.16 4.05 3.96 3.86 3.75 Area.sub.1/Area.sub.0 0.95 0.93 0.92 0.90 0.88 0.85 0.83
[0057] In TABLE 4A, the length of the midpoint of each side radially outward to the circle circumscribing the shape has been labeled as Y.sub.1. The radius (R.sub.1) in mm has been calculated by multiplying the diameter (D.sub.1) by the ratio R.sub.1/D.sub.1 shown in the table. The Area.sub.1 was calculated based upon the geometry and the other values shown in TABLE 4A. The final row of values in TABLE 4A is a ratio of the cross-sectional area of the invention (Area.sub.1) divided by the cross-sectional area of a round fiber with the same diameter as D.sub.1 (Area.sub.0).
[0058] TABLE 4A can be read as follows: The cross-section of the twisted fiber in
[0059] A modified class of shaped twisted lines defined by this invention includes the same shapes in
[0060] For example, TABLE 1A provides the values of Y.sub.1 as previously defined for twisted square shapes with a range of radii. As the radii (R.sub.1) increases, the value of Y.sub.1 decreases and the area increases. The data in TABLE 1A is representative of twisted fibers per
[0061] The practical commercial value of D.sub.1 for the fibers depicted in
[0062] As can be seen from TABLE 1B, the value of Y.sub.1 is now reduced by 33% compared to the values in TABLE 1A. As a result, the area of each fiber has increased relative to the examples in TABLE 1A. More area equates to more mass, which improves the durability and useful life of the twisted fiber.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 1B Theoretical Values for Twisted Square Cross- Sections with Various Radiiand Bowed Sides FIG. 6f 6e 6d 6c 6b 6a 1a D.sub.1 (mm) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 R.sub.1/D.sub.1 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 R.sub.1 (mm) 0.72 0.6 0.5 0.36 0.24 0.12 0 Y.sub.1 (mm) 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.18 0.22 0.35 Area.sub.1 (mm).sup.2 4.17 4.09 4.05 3.86 3.70 3.52 2.89 Area.sub.1/Area.sub.0 0.92 0.905 0.895 0.85 0.81 0.78 0.64
[0063] Likewise,
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 2B Theoretical Values for Twisted Triangular Cross- Sections with Various Radii and Bowed Sides FIG. 7f 7e 7d 7c 7b 7a 1b D.sub.1 (mm) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 R.sub.1/D.sub.1 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 R.sub.1 (mm) 0.72 0.6 0.5 0.36 0.24 0.12 0 Y.sub.1 (mm) 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.32 0.36 0.6 Area.sub.1 (mm).sup.2 3.89 3.71 3.53 3.33 3.13 2.92 1.88 Area.sub.1/Area.sub.0 0.86 0.825 0.78 0.74 0.69 0.64 0.42
[0064]
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 3B Theoretical Values for Twisted Pentagonal Cross- Sections with Various Radii and Bowed Sides FIG. 8f 8e 8d 8c 8b 8a 1c D.sub.1 (mm) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 R.sub.1/D.sub.1 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 R.sub.1 (mm) 0.72 0.6 0.5 0.36 0.24 0.12 0 Y.sub.1 (mm) 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.23 Area.sub.1 (mm).sup.2 4.32 4.26 4.22 4.14 4.07 4.00 3.43 Area.sub.1/Area.sub.0 0.96 0.94 0.93 0.92 0.90 0.88 0.76
[0065]
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 4B Theoretical Values for Twisted Hexagonal Cross- Sections with Various Radii and Bowed Sides FIG. 9f 9e 9d 9c 9b 9a 1d D.sub.1 (mm) 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 R.sub.1/D.sub.1 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 R.sub.1 (mm) 0.72 0.6 0.5 0.36 0.24 0.12 0 Y.sub.1 (mm) 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.16 Area.sub.1 (mm).sup.2 4.34 4.30 4.25 4.17 4.11 4.00 3.75 Area.sub.1/Area.sub.0 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.92 0.91 0.88 0.83
[0066] In the above examples, the arcs joining the adjacent sides of the polygons are circular arcs. The choice of arcs for the invention includes circular arcs, the arcs of a parabola, and other arc shapes so long as the arc is convex and contains no sharp edges. Each arc is tangent to the two adjacent sides with a smooth transition. As shown in
[0067] For polygons with an even number of sides (squares, hexagons and the like) the size of the arc for every other vertex could be different from the arc used for the in-between vertices. Likewise, for polygons with an even number of sides, the shape of the arc for every other vertex could be different from the shape of the vertices used for the in-between vertices.
[0068] Another aspect of the invention is that the cross-sectional shape is rotated uniformly along the length of the longitudinal axis. In all embodiments of the invention the cross-section is maintained constant and uniform over the entire longitudinal axis within the limits of manufacturing capabilities. However, the rotation of the cross-section relative to the longitudinal axis varies continuously by a specific angular amount per unit of length. In a square cross-section defined in the prior art, this results in the rotating trimmer line with four edges extending helically (
[0069] A degree of twisting in the order of magnitude of 20 twists per meter (20 t/m) means that the rotating trimming line is twisted by 360 degrees twenty times over the one meter length. The minimum level of twisting desired for this invention is 13.1 t/m; and, the maximum level of twist desired is 52.5 t/m. This is equivalent to one revolution of twist (360 degrees of rotation) every 0.75 to 3.00 inches. The ideal level of twist is 24.6 t/m, or one revolution of twist every 1.6 to 1.7 inches. The rotation can be described with the aid of an imaginary line on the surface of the trimmer line (prior to rotation) which is parallel to the fiber's longitudinal axis and which touches a plane upon which the fiber is resting. One revolution (REV) is defined by two adjacent points on the imaginary line which are touching the same plane after the fiber is twisted (
[0070] There are three ways to fabricate twist into monofilament trimmer line. One means is to rotate or spin the capillary in the spinneret plate from which the molten plastic is extruded. A second means is to rotate the spool both axially and longitudinally as the filament is wound onto the spool. These first two means can be accomplished during the extrusion process used to manufacture the monofilament trimmer line. The third means to impart twist to a filament is to perform the twisting after the monofilament is manufactured. To twist a short length of trimmer line, one end is first clamped and secured. Then the other end of the filament is rotated while the length of the fiber is exposed to sufficient heat. The twisted formation is constrained and allowed to cool. Alternately, the fiber can be twisted continuously by rotating the payoff spools to impart rotation into the fiber, while at the same time removing line from the spool, passing it through a nip to hold the twist, exposing the line continuously to heat to set the shape, cooling the line, passing it through a second nip, and winding the line onto a take-up spool.
[0071] A preferred embodiment is a twisted equilateral triangle (three-sided polygon) where each of the three vertices has been replaced with a generous circular arc.
[0072] A second preferred embodiment is a twisted square (four-sided polygon) where each of the four vertices has been replaced with a generous circular arc.
[0073] A third preferred embodiment is a twisted pentagon (five-side polygon) where each of the five vertices has been replaced with a generous circular arc.
[0074] A fourth preferred embodiment is a twisted hexagon (six-sided polygon) where each of the six vertices has been replaced with a generous circular arc.
[0075] Additional preferred embodiments include the above embodiments where the sides are equally bowed outward.
Testing
[0076] To measure the impact of a fiber's shape on battery life, the following setup was used. A model CGT400 string trimmer manufactured by Core Outdoor Power was mounted on a stand such that the trimmer head was suspended above the floor of the lab. A Shakespeare™ brand Fury™ trimmer head was mounted on the CGT400 trimmer. The Fury™ head is designed to hold two lengths of trimmer line using two sets of dual clamps. For all of the examples below, the line samples were cut to have a blunt tip and cut to a length of 6.5 inches. A mark was made on all samples 5 inches from the blunt tip. When installing the line in the Fury™ head, this mark was centered in the eyelet of the head so that 5 inches of line extended from each eyelet. The two opposing eyelets are three inches apart. Thus the line swatch was 13 inches.
[0077] The CGT400 trimmer is powered by lithium batteries. The unit was operated at low speed for the following examples. At low speed, the trimmer spins trimmer lines at a constant rate of 5,005 rpms. The controls for the CGT400 vary the amount of electricity used from the battery to maintain the 5,005 rpms. If a particular trimmer line shape has lots of air drag, then the demand for electricity on the battery increases and the battery runs out of power in a shorter period of time. If a different line shape is more aerodynamic, then less power is required to spin the line and the battery will run for a longer period of time before electricity in the lithium battery is consumed.
[0078] For all of the tests discussed below, the same lithium battery and the same battery charger were used. The battery took a minimum of three hours to charge for each test. The trimmer machine throttle was taped to maintain the trimmer operating continuously. Once the charged battery was inserted into the trimmer it would begin spinning the line samples and would run until the battery was depleted. The same battery would be fully recharged for the next test.
[0079] The noise generated by each sample of trimmer line was measured using a digital sound level meter model 407750 from Extech. The sound was measured 58 inches from the trimmer head, just above the throttle of the trimmer. The samples selected were all approximately 95 mils (2.4 mm) in diameter, or the cross-section could be circumscribed by a circle 95 mils (2.4 mm) in diameter.
Example 1
[0080] A sample of round copolymer trimmer line labeled as having a 95 mil diameter was selected for testing. The diameter was measured and found to range from 94 to 96 mils. Ten pieces of line were cut to 6.5 inches and marked at 5 inches from a blunt cut end. A pair of lines was inserted into the Fury™ head such that 5 inches of line extended from each of the two opposing eyelets. The swath was 13 inches. The battery was inserted into the trimmer and it was allowed to operate until the lithium battery was depleted. The run time and the noise generated were recorded. This process was repeated until five pairs of lines were tested. The results were as follows:
TABLE-US-00009 Battery Run Sample # Time (minutes) Noise (dB) 1 53.8 84.0 2 54.5 83.5 3 56.5 83.3 4 56.0 83.8 5 55.7 84.0 Avg. 55.3 83.7 Range 2.7 0.7
Round line was tested because this is the most common shape of trimmer line.
Example 2
[0081] A sample of trimmer line was made with the cross-section shown in
TABLE-US-00010 Battery Run Sample # Time (minutes) Noise (dB) 1 48.9 88.0 2 63.9 79.5 3 55.9 83.8 4 56.5 83.8 Avg. 56.3 83.7 Range 15.0 8.5
[0082] The average battery run time and the average noise generated by this line was not statistically different from the round line. However, the range increased significantly. The increase in variation is thought to be attributable to the possible variations in orientation of the line's cross-sectional shape within the eyelet. Depending on the orientation of the line, the line's leading edge might be a flat shape, a circular arc, or somewhere between these two options.
Example 3
[0083] A sample of trimmer line was made with the cross-section shown in
TABLE-US-00011 Battery Run Sample # Time (minutes) Noise (dB) 1 61.2 70.0 2 59.9 72.3 3 62.1 72.5 4 61.8 72.0 5 59.0 72.5 Avg. 60.8 71.0 Range 3.1 2.5
[0084] In summary, the battery run time increased from 55.3 minutes for round line to 60.8 minutes for the twisted line made with the cross-sectional shape in
[0085] The rotating line was observed utilizing a strobe light. The rotating line was observed to be spinning in a single plane.
Example 4
[0086] An alternate sample of twist trimmer line was tested. The cross-section is depicted in
TABLE-US-00012 Battery Run Sample # Time (minutes) Noise (dB) 1 60.4 78 2 56.5 81 3 56.9 80 Avg. 57.9 79.7 Range 3.8 3
[0087] The average battery run time for this sample was approximately mid-way between the run time for round line (Example 1) and the sample in Example 3 above. The noise generated was above the mid-point for the lines in Examples 1 and 3 above; close to the noise generated for round line. Example 4 exhibits the negative impact of longitudinal grooves on both battery life and noise generation.
Example 5
[0088] A sample of non-twisted trimmer line was obtained with a cross-section per FIG. 1 of U.S. Pat. D358535, which is a triangle with slightly concaved sides and truncated tips. The truncated tips result in six sharp longitudinal edges. Six pieces of line were cut to 6.5 inches and marked at 5 inches from a blunt cut end. A pair of lines was inserted into the Fury™ head such that 5 inches of line extended from each of the two eyelets. The swath was 13 inches. The battery was inserted into the trimmer and it was allowed to operate until the lithium battery was depleted. The run time and the noise generated were recorded. This process was repeated until three pairs of lines were tested. The results were as follows:
TABLE-US-00013 Battery Run Sample # Time (minutes) Noise (dB) 1 43.3 82 2 40.1 86 3 41.6 86 Avg. 41.7 84.7 Range 3.2 4.0
[0089] Unfortunately, this shape greatly reduced the average battery run time. The average battery run time was reduced by almost 25% compared to round line and was 31% less than Example 3. Additionally, the noise generated was slightly greater than the noise associated with round line.
[0090] The rotating line was observed with a strobe light. The line was observed fluttering between multiple planes of rotation.
Example 6
[0091] The same sample of trimmer line used in Example 5 was twisted to a level of one revolution every 0.75 inches. Two pieces of line were cut to 6.5 inches and marked at 5 inches from a blunt cut end. This pair of lines was inserted into the Fury™ head such that 5 inches of line extended from each of the two eyelets. The swath was 13 inches. The battery was inserted into the trimmer and it was allowed to operate until the lithium battery was depleted. The run time and the noise generated were recorded. The lines were then removed and reinserted and tested again. This process was repeated a third time. The results were as follows:
TABLE-US-00014 Battery Run Sample # Time (minutes) Noise (dB) 1 48.7 71 2 47.6 71 3 46.0 71 Avg. 47.4 71 Range 2.7 0
[0092] By twisting the shape in FIG. 1 of US D358535, the battery run time was improved from 41.7 to 47.4 minutes relative to the same shaped line not twisted. Twisting this shape greatly attenuated the noise generated by the non-twisted shape (71 dB vs. 84.7 dB). However, the battery run time is still much less than 55.3 minutes of run time for round line. The best performing triangular shaped line of these examples is the twisted shape from Example 3—the battery run time was 60.8 minutes. The cross sectional shape in Example 3 had flat sides with no concaved grooves and generous circular arcs at the vertices.
[0093] The noise generated in Example 6 was at the lowest level of all the samples tested, but only slightly better than the line in Example 3. Example 3 and Example 6 are evidence that twisting a non-round cross-sectional shaped trimmer line to attenuate noise does not correlate to a similar reduction in drag. Example 6 attenuated the most noise, but consumed much more of the battery life compared to Example 3.
[0094] The average battery life and noise generated for all six of the above examples in summarized in TABLE 5 below:
TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 5 Data Summary for Examples 1-6 Avg. Battery Avg. Sound Example Run Time (Min.) Level (dB) 1 55.3 83.7 2 56.3 83.8 3 60.8 71.9 4 57.9 79.7 5 41.7 84.7 6 47.4 71.0
[0095] The data is also plotted in
[0096] It is important to note that a 10 dB drop in sound levels is perceived by humans as a 50% drop in the level of noise generated. The drop from 79.7 dB for Example 4 to 71.9 dB for Example 3 is significant.
[0097] Other variations are within the spirit of the present invention. Thus, while the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, a certain illustrated embodiment thereof is shown in the drawings and has been described above in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the invention to the specific form or forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined in the appended claims.
[0098] All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein.
[0099] The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. The term “connected” is to be construed as partly or wholly contained within, attached to, or joined together, even if there is something intervening. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate embodiments of the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
[0100] Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.