PRESERVATIVE COMPOSITION FOR WOOD BASED ON MODIFIED LIGNIN

Abstract

A method for preparing a wood preservative composition, includes modifying lignin with Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7 or NaNO.sub.3 and then with a chromium (II) salt, copper (II), cadmium (II) or zinc (II), for example, metal nitrates (Cr(NO.sub.3).sub.2, Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2, Cd(NO.sub.3).sub.2, Zn(NO.sub.3).sub.2); to the preservative obtainable by this method; and to a method for preserving wood; and to the preserved wood. The preservative prevents degradation by xylophagous and fungal agents, and also improves some properties of the wood, and the hygroscopicity and fire resistance.

Claims

1. A method for preparing a preservative composition for wood, the method includes the steps of: a) mixing lignin and a solution of Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7 or NaNO.sub.3 while stirring; b) adding, while stirring, a metallic salt containing a M.sup.2+ ion, wherein M is an element selected from groups 6, 11, and 12 of the periodic table of elements; c) filtering the solid resulting in step c), which is a modified lignin; and d) suspending the modified lignin in water to obtain the preservative composition for wood.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein M is selected from the group formed by chromium, copper, zinc, and cadmium.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the anion of the metallic salt is NO.sub.3.sup.2−.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein in step d) the water, in which the solid is suspended, contains a base with the aim of having a pH of between 7 and 13, and an acid is then added to obtain a pH of around 7.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the base is selected from the group formed by NaOH and KOH.

6. The method according to claim 4, wherein the acid is selected from the group formed by sulfuric acid, boric acid, acetic acid, and hydrochloric acid.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the quantity of modified lignin is between 0.1 and 30% by weight with respect to the total weight of the preservative composition.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the metallic salt is selected from the group consisting of Cr(NO.sub.3).sub.2, Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2, Cd(NO.sub.3).sub.2, and Zn(NO.sub.3).sub.2).

9. A preservative composition for wood based on modified lignin, obtainable by means of the method of claim 1.

10. The method for preserving wood, which comprises impregnating the wood to be preserved with the preservative composition of claim 9.

11. A preserved wood obtainable by the steps recited in the method of claim 10.

12. The preserved wood according to claim 11, which exhibits a loss of mass due to attack from the fungi Trametes versicolour, measured according to the ASTM D2017-94 standard, at least 75% lower than the loss of the same untreated wood.

13. The preserved wood according to claim 11, which exhibits a Brinell hardness at least 40% greater than the same untreated wood.

14. The preserved wood according to claim 11, which exhibits a loss of mass in the test of fire resistance from direct exposure lower by at least four percentage points than the same untreated wood.

15. The preserved wood according to claim 11, for outdoor use.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0021] FIG. 1 shows a possible construction of the cylinder used for impregnating the wood.

[0022] FIG. 2 shows a graph reflecting the behavior of the contact angle as a function of the time for the wood samples treated with the different treatments in longitudinal tangential sections.

[0023] FIG. 3 shows a graph reflecting the behavior of the sessile drop as a function of time, for the wood samples of Pinus spp. treated with the different treatments in the longitudinal tangential section.

[0024] FIG. 4 shows a graph reflecting the effect of different lignin treatments in the results observed for the hardness of the samples.

[0025] FIG. 5 shows a graph reflecting the behavior of the wood samples treated with the different treatments for adhesion resistance.

[0026] FIG. 6 shows a graph reflecting the behavior of loss of mass in the wood samples treated with the different treatments for fire resistance from direct exposure.

[0027] FIG. 7 shows a graph reflecting the behavior of the wood samples treated with the different treatments for fire resistance from direct exposure for 2 minutes.

[0028] FIG. 8 shows the installation site of the degradation field in a eucalyptus forest.

[0029] FIG. 9 shows a graph reflecting the behavior of the wood samples of Pinus spp. with the different treatments according to the disclosure, exposed to accelerated aging in a weathering chamber.

[0030] FIG. 10 shows a graph reflecting the retention of the wood samples treated with the different treatments present in the disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0031] According to a first aspect, the present disclosure relates to a method for preparing a preservative composition for wood, which comprises the steps of:

a) mixing lignin and a solution of Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7 or NaNO.sub.3 while stirring;
b) adding, while stirring, a metallic salt containing a M.sup.2+ ion, wherein M is an element selected from the groups 6, 11 or 12 of the periodic table of elements;
c) filtering the solid resulting in step c), which is a modified lignin;
d) suspending the modified lignin in water to obtain the preservative composition for wood.

[0032] The lignin used can be any obtained from different processes (Kraft and Organosolv) and preferably any commercially available.

[0033] The addition of Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7 or NaNO.sub.3 carried out in step a), modifies mainly the carboxylic and hydroxylic groups of the lignin, allowing the interaction of these M.sup.2+ ions added in step b) with the molecule of the lignin. Group 6 of the periodic table of elements comprises, among others, the elements, chromium and molybdenum; Group 11 comprises copper, silver and gold; Group 12 comprises zinc and cadmium.

[0034] M is preferably selected from the group formed by chromium, copper, zinc and cadmium, the cation of the metallic salt being one of the group formed by Cr (II), Cu(II), Zn(II) and Cd(II).

[0035] Preferably, the anion of the metallic salt is selected from the group formed by NO.sub.3.sup.2−, for example, metal nitrates (Cr(NO.sub.3).sub.2, Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2, Cd(NO.sub.3).sub.2, Zn(NO.sub.3).sub.2), or Zn(NO.sub.3).sub.2).

[0036] Preferably, with the aim of obtaining a composition that is as homogeneous as possible, in step d) of the previous method, the water, in which the solid is suspended, contains a base, with the aim of providing a pH of between 7 and 13, and an acid is then added to ultimately obtain a pH of around 7.

[0037] Said base is preferably selected from the group formed by NaOH and KOH, although other bases known to the person skilled in the art could be used, and the acid preferably, although not limited to, is selected from the group formed by boric acid, acetic acid, sulfuric acid, and hydrochloric acid.

[0038] The final concentration of the modified lignin in the preservative composition can vary between 0.1 to 30% by weight, with respect to the total weight of the preservative solution. According to particular embodiments, the final concentration can be, for example, greater than 0.5%, or greater than 1%, or greater than 3%, or greater than 5%, or greater than 7.5%, or greater than 10%, and can be, for example, lower than 23% by weight, or lower than 21%, or lower than 19%, or lower than 18%, or lower than 16%, or lower than 15%. All the lower and greater values indicated are combinable with one another. Preferably, the range will be between 5 and 18%.

[0039] According to another aspect of the disclosure, the same relates to a preservative composition for wood based on modified lignin, obtainable by means of the previously detailed process. Likewise, it relates to the preservative composition for wood based on modified lignin, obtainable by means of said method of the disclosure.

[0040] Another aspect of the disclosure relates to a composition containing lignin (CAS 9005-53-2), modified with Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7 or NaNO.sub.3 and M.sup.2+ metal ions, such as defined previously. All the defined exemplary or preferred embodiments previously indicated are applicable to this composition.

[0041] According to an additional aspect, the present disclosure relates to a method for preserving wood, which comprises impregnating the wood to be preserved with the obtainable preservative composition or preservative composition obtainable according to the present disclosure.

[0042] The impregnation can be carried out using any impregnation method known in the prior art, for example, but not limited to, the Bethell or immersion process, methods commonly practiced in the timber industry, with a solution containing lignin modified according to the present disclosure.

[0043] Another aspect of the present disclosure is a preserved wood obtainable by means of the preservation process of the disclosure, using the preservative composition containing modified lignin, previously detailed. The wood to be preserved can be any type of wood, from hard woods to soft woods.

[0044] Hard woods are those which come from slow-growing trees, therefore, they are denser and naturally tolerate the weathering of time better than the soft woods, even though they have not received any preservative treatment. These woods generally come from deciduous trees, but can also be from evergreen trees, which take decades, even centuries, to reach the degree of maturity sufficient to be cut and can be used in the making of furniture or beams of large homes or single-family homes. They are much more expensive than the soft woods, due to the fact that their slow growth causes their scarcity, but it is much more attractive to construct furniture with them. Examples of trees considered to provide hard wood are, for example, beech, oak, walnut, maple, hornbeam, teak, lapacho, etc. Chestnut is often also categorized as hard wood due to its hardness. Although, the preservation of the hard woods is not as necessary, perhaps as in the soft woods, given its high price, it is advisable to also subject them to preservative treatments, with the aim of increasing their useful life even further.

[0045] Soft woods, in turn, encompass the wood of trees belonging to the order of coniferous and other quick-growing trees. The significant advantage they have with respect to hard woods, is their lightweight and their much lower price. Nevertheless, they do not have as long a life as the hard woods. Their manipulation is much easier, although it has the disadvantage of producing a greater quantity of chips. Some examples of soft woods that are widely used are: pine, elm, spruce, birch, poplar, cypress, balsa, etc. Chestnut is often also categorized as soft wood due to its flexibility.

[0046] The present disclosure is especially useful for preserving soft woods, improving its hardness and resistance, being able to maintain its affordable price, for example, widely used pine or spruce woods.

[0047] Specifically, the wood preserved according to the present disclosure has a loss of mass due to attack from the fungi Trametes versicolour, measured according to the ASTM D2017-94 standard, at least 75% lower than the loss of the same untreated wood, preferably at least 80% lower, more preferably at least 85% lower, and even more preferably at least 90% lower.

[0048] In the present specification, when reference is made to an ASTM standard, reference is made to American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM D-1413 (2007): standard test method for wood preservatives by laboratory soil-block cultures. Philadelphia, 2007, 8p. [0049] ASTM D-2017 (1994): Standard Method Of Accelerated Laboratory Test Of Natural Decay Resistance Of Wood. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, San Diego, v. 410, 1994, 4p. [0050] ASTM D3165-07 (2014), Standard Test Method for Strength Properties of Adhesives in Shear by Tension Loading of Single-Lap-Joint Laminated Assemblies, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, San Diego, P A, 2014.3p.

[0051] Likewise, the wood preserved according to the present disclosure exhibits a Brinell hardness at least 40% greater than the same untreated wood, preferably at least 60% greater, more preferably at least 75% greater, and even more preferably at least 90% greater.

[0052] Furthermore, the wood preserved according to the present disclosure exhibits a loss of mass in the test of fire resistance from direct exposure lower by at least four percentage points than the same untreated wood, preferably by at least 5 percentage points.

[0053] Next, the present disclosure will be described in greater detail based on a series of examples; however, these examples should, in no way, be considered as limiting the scope of the disclosure, which is defined by the annexed claims.

EXAMPLES

Preparation of Preservative Compositions According to the Disclosure

Example 1: Preparation of a Preservative Composition Based on Lignin Modified with NaNO.SUB.3 .and Cu(NO.SUB.3.).SUB.2

[0054] 5 g of lignin was added to 2 L of a solution containing 1.6998 g of NaNO.sub.3 applying constant and vigorous stirring. In a second step, 1.546 g of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 was added to the suspension containing lignin pre-modified with NaNO.sub.3. Following 1 h under constant stirring, the solution was filtered through a 0.45 micron polyamide filter. The resulting solid, which is a lignin modified according to the present disclosure, is dried in a furnace at 50° C. for 24 h.

[0055] The lignin modified with copper obtained previously was used to prepare preservative compositions according to the present disclosure; for which purpose, said modified lignin was added, at different concentrations, which can vary from 0.1 to 30% by weight, to a solution of NaOH 0.1% with stirring for 5 minutes; Immediately after, an acid (sulfuric acid 3% or boric acid 6.8%) was added to obtain a pH of approximately 7 (approximately 100 milliliters), maintaining the stirring for 5 minutes; Lastly, the volume was completed up to 1 liter.

Example 2: Preparation of a Preservative Composition Based on Lignin Modified with Na.SUB.2.B.SUB.4.O.SUB.7 .and Cu(NO.SUB.3.).SUB.2

[0056] 5 g of each sample of lignin was added to 2 L of a solution containing 4.024 g of Na.sub.2B.sub.4O.sub.7 applying constant and vigorous stirring. Immediately after maintaining for 2 h at ambient temperature, the pH was adjusted to 7 by means of adding acid H.sub.2SO.sub.4 98%, before adding the metal ions. 6.30 g of Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2 was added to the suspension containing the pre-modified lignin and the values of conductivity and pH were measured. Following 1 h under constant stirring, the solution was filtered through a 0.45 micron polyamide filter. The resulting solid, which is a lignin modified according to the present disclosure, was dried in a furnace at 50° C. for 24 h.

[0057] The lignin modified with the copper obtained previously was used to prepare preservative compositions according to the present disclosure; for which purpose, said modified lignin was added, at different concentrations, which can vary from 0.1 to 30% by weight, to a solution of NaOH 0.1% with stirring for 5 minutes; Immediately after, an acid (sulfuric acid 3% or boric acid 6.8%) was added to obtain a pH of approximately 7 (approximately 100 milliliters), maintaining the stirring for 5 minutes; Lastly, the volume was completed up to 1 liter.

Example 3: Preparation of a Preservative Composition Based on Lignin Modified with NaNO.SUB.3 .and Cd(NO.SUB.3.).SUB.3

[0058] 5 g of lignin was added to 2 L of a solution containing 1.6998 g of NaNO.sub.3 applying constant and vigorous stirring. In a second step, 0.987 g of Cd(NO.sub.3).sub.3 was added to the suspension containing lignin pre-modified with NaNO.sub.3.

[0059] Following 1 h under constant stirring, the same methods as in Example 1 were used. This modified lignin was used for the preparation of a preservative composition according to the disclosure.

Use of the Preservative Compositions According to the Disclosure in the Treatment of Wood

Example 4: Treatment of Wood with the Preservative Composition Obtained in Examples 1, 2 and 3

[0060] In this study, the efficacy of the use of the preservative composition of the present disclosure was verified, specifically, the composition obtained in the preceding Examples 1 and 3. Said efficacy was verified using 5 Pinus spp and Eucalyptus spp trees, obtained from a homogeneous population; the first bolt of the diameter at breast height (DBH, approximately 1.30 meters) was removed from all the trees, a piece from which the samples were dried for different analyses, and were placed in a climatic chamber at 20° C. and a relative humidity of 65%, with the aim of stabilizing the content of moisture balance.

[0061] The wood was treated with the preservative composition of the present disclosure according to the modified ASTM D-1413-07 standard. The treatment was carried out in a treatment cylinder and a vacuum pump (see FIG. 1) by means of a method similar to the Bethel treatment for wood posts. The samples were placed in the interior of the cylinder, an initial vacuum of 600 mm of Hg was applied for 30 min., under the vacuum the solution is released into the cylinder and afterwards, a pressure of 6 bar is applied for 60 min. A final vacuum of 30 min. is carried out to remove the excess solution from the specimens. Once the treatment is complete, the treated samples were removed and immediately after they were weighed to determine the absorption of the preservative composition, to determine the average of the retention capacity (kg/m.sup.3) in each treatment. Lastly, the samples were placed in a climatic chamber at 20° C. and a relative humidity of 65%, with the aim of stabilizing the content of moisture balance, to carry out the subsequent analyses.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Preservative Compositions According to the Disclosure

[0062] The characterization of the wood treated with the different preservative compositions prepared according to the present disclosure was carried out (Table 1). This characterization is very important for determining the efficacy of the compositions, and their possible uses. The fungicidal activity by the attack of fungi Trametes versicolour and Ganoderma applanatum was determined: the loss of mass, the chemical modification, the hygroscopicity, the specular gloss and the hardness.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 The different treatments with modified lignin applied in the wood. Treatment Lignin pre-treatment Preservative type I NaNO.sub.3 NT II NaNO.sub.3 EOL.sub.Cu III NaNO.sub.3 EOL.sub.Cd IV NaNO.sub.3 EOL.sub.Zn V NaNO.sub.3 EKL.sub.Cu VI NaNO.sub.3 EKL.sub.Cd VII NaNO.sub.3 EKL.sub.Zn VIII NaNO.sub.3 EOL.sub.Cucrb IX NaNO.sub.3 EKL.sub.Cucrb NT = untreated sample EOL.sub.Cu = Organosolv lignin emulsion modified with copper, EOL.sub.Cd = Organosolv lignin emulsion modified with cadmium, EOL.sub.Zn = Organosolv lignin emulsion modified with zinc, EKL.sub.Cu = Kraft lignin emulsion modified with copper, EKL.sub.Cd = Kraft lignin emulsion modified with cadmium, EKL.sub.zn= Kraft lignin emulsion modified with zinc, EOL.sub.Cucrb = Organosolv lignin emulsion modified with copper, chromium and boron and EKL.sub.Cucrb = Kraft lignin emulsion modified with copper, chromium and boron.

Example 5: Loss of Mass by Attack of Fungi

[0063] The resistance of each one of the samples treated with preservative of the present disclosure was determined according to the ASTM D 2017-94 standard. The standard is used to evaluate the resistance of the wood products or other organic materials subject to disintegration by fungi which destroy the wood, such as Trametes versicolour and Ganoderma applanatum.

[0064] The results obtained are indicated in Table 2; the samples exhibiting the best result were treated with the treatment Ill (EOL.sub.Cd) where the Organosolv lignin modified with cadmium was used, with a smaller percentage of weight loss when it is exposed to the fungus Trametes versicolour for a period of 48 weeks of exposure. These samples were classified according to the ASTM D2017-94 standard as long duration (very resistant). The untreated samples showed a greater loss of mass, being classified according to the ASTMD-2017-94 standard as moderately resistant (moderately resistant). All the treatments with compositions according to the present disclosure have had better results than the untreated samples, consequently, they are useful as a preservative of the wood, for increasing the resistance to the fungus T. versicolour and G. applanatum.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Effect of different treatments with modified lignin in the loss of mass in samples exposed to the attack of fungi. Treatment Fungus Loss of mass (%) I Trametes versicolor 35.80(8.66)b II Trametes versicolor  0.99(0.50)a III Trametes versicolor  0.80(0.17)a IV Trametes versicolor  3.08(2.25)a V Trametes versicolor  3.20(2.91)a VI Trametes versicolor  4.73(1.90)a VII Trametes versicolor  1.64(0.24)a VIII Ganoderma applanatum 18.05(7.7)a IX Ganoderma applanatum 17.38(7.6)a The values between parentheses are the average values of standard deviation, in the same column, samples sharing different letters, are significantly different to the level of 5% in the Tukey test.

Example 6: Determination of the Hygroscopicity

[0065] In FIG. 2, the results of the samples treated with the different treatments with preservative of the present disclosure are shown. It is possible to observe that in all the treatments there was an improvement in the hygroscopicity of the wood, becoming increasingly more hydrophobic, in comparison to the untreated wood. The efficiency of chemical preservatives is mainly due to their hygroscopicity, because the reduction of the moisture content of the wood inhibits the growth of fungi. The treatment that showed the best results was the wood treated with the treatment III (EOLcd), showing average values of 86.56° at the angle of the sessile drop after 180 seconds of exposure, being a value greater than the average of the untreated wood) (64.74°, in the values after the exposure the sessile drop (initial moment), as can be seen in FIG. 3.

Example 7: Determination of the Brinell Hardness

[0066] The (Brinell) hardness was greater with treatments with preservative of the present disclosure in comparison to the untreated wood; wood treated with the treatment IV (EOL.sub.Zn) for the Pinus species showed an increase of around 98% in the Brinell hardness in comparison to the untreated wood. The results demonstrate a reduction in the hardness of the treatments III (EOL.sub.Cd) and VI (EKL.sub.Cd) for the Pinus species, in comparison to the other treatments carried out, but the lowest average hardness values for the different treatments showed an increase of 41% in comparison to the untreated wood, as can be seen in FIG. 4. It is known that the hardness has various influences such as the density of the wood, but it is possible to observe in this study that the treatment with lignin modified with metals influenced the variation of hardness in the samples of both species.

[0067] For the Pinus sp., species the treatment EKL.sub.Cd exhibited the maximum values for the Brinell hardness. However, the samples of Eucalyptus sp. wood subjected to the same treatment exhibited lower hardness values. The results demonstrate that the treatments with EOL.sub.Cu and EOL.sub.Cd reduced the hardness of the wood of the Pinus sp., species.

Example 8: Determination of the Adhesion Resistance

[0068] In this study, the different treatments according to the disclosure studied in the process of adhesion resistance of the wood were evaluated (FIG. 5).

[0069] The average values of the shearing resistance of the Eucalyptus spp wood were increased with the treatments according to the disclosure, with the exception of the treatment III (EOL.sub.Cd), which exhibited a shear strength reduction of 4.5% with respect to the untreated wood. This fact can be explained by the reduced hygroscopicity of the wood, which, with the treatment, became more hydrophobic. This meant that the penetrability of the adhesive was reduced, but still exhibits results in compliance with the ASTM D-3165-07 standard, ABNT 790, which stipulates that the preservative products for the wood must guarantee durability and biological protection, without affecting the adhesion of the adhesive.

[0070] ABNT is an abbreviation for Brazilian Association of Technical Standards. NBR 16202: Postes de eucalipto preservedo para redes de distribuição. Rio de Janeiro, 2013. 65 p.

[0071] The results of the shearing resistance of the woods treated according to the disclosure (FIG. 5) in comparison to the untreated wood, revealed that the Pinus spp wood had the worst behavior with respect to the treatment.

Example 9: Fire Resistance for Short Periods

[0072] This study evaluated the different treatments with the preservative of the present disclosure in exposure of the wood in contact with direct flame for two minutes; next, in the absence of fire, it was observed how long the loss of mass and the ignition, flame and ember times lasted. All the treatments carried out with the preservatives of the present disclosure, caused a reduction in the loss of mass with respect to the untreated wood for both species (FIG. 6), with the exception of the EKL treatment, which exhibited the same value as the untreated Pinus spp wood.

[0073] In FIG. 7, it is possible to observe that the treatment III (EOL.sub.Cd) was maintained for a shorter time in flames and embers; in all the other treatments, the samples exhibited longer times than the untreated sample. FIG. 7 shows that the treatment with EOL.sub.Cd exhibited the longest ignition time for Pinus spp., with 32.8 seconds, which represents an increase of 144% in relation to the untreated samples.

[0074] It is also observed in FIG. 7 that the ember time is shorter in the woods of the Eucalyptus species than in those of the Pinus species. In the Eucalyptus wood, only the EOL.sub.Zn treatment exhibited longer ember time in comparison to the untreated wood. For Eucalyptus spp., none of the evaluated treatments exhibited a reduction to the ember time compared with the untreated woods. This fact means that the treatment makes it difficult for the fire to penetrate the surface of the wood, reaching its interior; for this reason, the reduction of the loss of mass (FIG. 6) of the samples occurred due to exposure to fire. The results demonstrated that the treatments exhibit a very interesting behaviour in contact with the flame, which demonstrates the efficiency of the different preservative compositions of the present disclosure as a fire retardant.

Example 10: Color Test

[0075] Aesthetics has gained importance in recent years and wood is an attractive material, depending on its design, its color and its surface. It is also necessary to take into account the external appearance of the wood, since it may end up being one of the most important criteria when deciding to buy. With the aim of quantitatively evaluating the change in the color of the pine samples treated with different preservatives according to the present disclosure, the color of the wood was measured with the CIE L*a*b* system (Hunter, Richard Sewall. “Photoelectric Color-Difference Meter”. JOSA. 38 (7): 661, 1948). The woods treated according to the present disclosure also exhibit improvements in terms of the color obtained (Table 3). The treatments IV (EOL.sub.Zn) and V (EKLcu) resulted in darker final products with a reduction in the average values of (L*), which indicates the luminosity of the wood. In general, the darker color is more attractive and competitive, since the appearance of the wood of the present disclosure comes close to that of some noble woods. The coordinate (a*) in the woods treated according to the disclosure exhibits a range of 7 to 9.00, with respect to the untreated wood of 3.6, that is to say, they exhibit an intensification of the color in the direction to red with the different treatments carried out. The average values of the variation of the color (EΔ*) are between 9.39 and 26.52, exhibiting a very significant variation. This is due to the color of the emulsion, black-brown, which produced the variation of the initial color of the samples visible to the human eye. The tonality angle)(H° reduced in all the treatments of the disclosure.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Effect of the different position on color parameters on the surface of the samples of different treatments examined. Treatment L* a* b* C H° ΔE* I 82.41 (2.8)d 3.60 (0.8)a 21.60 (1.2)a 21.91 (1.23)ab 80.57 (1.99)c — II 74.91 (1.68)c 8.27 (1.15)bc 24.78 (0.30)ab 26.14 (0.44)cd 71.58 (2.41)b  9.39 III 69.44 (3.08)bc 8.66 (1.15)bc 25.55 (2.45)abc 27.00 (2.75)d 71.39 (2.38)b 14.47 IV 56.68 (8.76)a 7.21 (0.95)b 19.73 (3.19)bcd 21.03 (3.16)a 69.72 (2.84)ab 26.05 V 56.45 (9.41)a 9.00 (0.54)c 22.07 (2.87)bcd 23.86 (2.67)abc 67.57 (2.84)a 13.03 VI 70.08 (2.60)bc 7.59 (1.24)bc 22.91 (0.99)cd 24.15 (1.28)bcd 71.76 (2.25)b 16.18 The values between parentheses are the average values of standard deviation, in the same column samples sharing different letters are significantly different to the level of 5% in the Tukey test.

Example 11: Natural Aging in Degradation Field

[0076] The field test is indispensable and represents a vital point in the use potential evaluation of a new preservative. In order to evaluate the behavior of the samples treated with preservative emulsions of the present disclosure the wood in contact with the degradation field for 405 days of exposure (FIG. 8) in a eucalyptus forest, the occurrence of fungal and termite attacks was evaluated visually, determining the rate of healing of the samples. A significant degradation of the samples of untreated Pinus spp wood was observed at the end of the 405 days of exposure, being classified as intensively attacked by fungi after 315 days of exposure, and destroyed after 405 days of exposure. Only 3 untreated samples in the entire experiment exhibited some attack by termites, both moderately attacked, being samples obtained at different times (225, 360 and 405 days) of exposure.

[0077] The Pinus spp samples treated with preservative according to the present disclosure were moderately attacked by fungi after 315 days of exposure, but with no occurrence of attack by termites, with the exception of the treatment with EOL.sub.Zn, which was moderately attacked by fungi after 315 days of exposure.

[0078] The untreated Eucalyptus spp samples were intensively attacked by fungi. Regarding the samples with EOL.sub.Cu and EOL.sub.Zn treatments, they were moderately attacked, without any occurrence of attack by termites for 405 days of exposure.

Example 12: Accelerated Weathering Chamber

[0079] In this step, the Pinus sp. samples treated with preservative according to the present disclosure were evaluated, of three different compositions, specifically, the Kraft and Organosolv lignin emulsions modified with chromium, copper and boron (EKL.sub.Cucrb and EOL.sub.Cucrb). All the experiments were compared with the untreated wood.

[0080] In FIG. 9, it is possible to observe the degradation of the Pinus sp. samples, exposed to accelerated aging in a weathering chamber for a period of 1680 hours of exposure, where the untreated samples exhibited cracks throughout the exposure. All the treatments exhibited darker coloration than the untreated wood. The untreated wood exhibited greater loss, of 70.6%, than the wood treated with EKL.sub.Cucrb,EKL.sub.Cucrb, which demonstrates the efficiency of the treatment for 1680 hours of direct exposure to ultraviolet rays. The other treatments exhibited results of loss of mass lower than the untreated wood.

Example 13: Retention of the Preservative According to the Present Disclosure

[0081] The volumetric analysis was used to calculate the retention of the preservatives according to the present disclosure in the wood samples (Pinus and Eucalyptus), by quantitative method. Using the atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) results, the percentages of active ingredient (metal) in the preservatives of the present disclosure, which was used to treat the wood, were calculated. They are the following: EOLCu, 0.24% of Cu; EOLZn, 0.55% of Zn, EOLCd, 0.15% of Cd, EKLCd, 0.28% of Cd, KLCu, 0.47% of Cu and, lastly, KLZn, 1.12% of Zn. FIG. 10 represents the retention of the preservatives of the present disclosure. It is observed that the samples with greatest retentions are those treated with Zn and were those which exhibited the greatest concentration of metal. According to the NBR 16202 standard (ABNT, 2013), retention is a quantitative parameter, it is considered the most important factor to evaluate the quality of a preservative treatment and refers to the quantity of toxic product retained in a given volume of wood expressed in kg/m.sup.3. In the Pinus sp. species treated with EOLZn, an average retention of 5.68 kg/m.sup.3 of emulsion was achieved (FIG. 10). For the Eucalyptus sp. species treated with EOLZn, an average retention of 5.2 kg/m.sup.3 was achieved. The recommended retention for the Eucalyptus posts is approximately 5 kg/m.sup.3 NBR 16202 (ABNT, 2013).