FCC yield selectivity improvements in high containment riser termination systems

Abstract

The invention provides an improved system for separation technology intended to reduce unwanted catalyst/thermal reactions by minimizing contact of the hydrocarbons and the catalyst within the reactor.

Claims

1. A process for increasing hydrocarbon yield and decreasing coke production in a fluidic catalytic cracker reactor having a separation unit, the process comprising: locating a bed of fluidized catalyst in the fluidic catalytic cracker reactor beneath a baffle member that is positioned proximate a bottom portion of the separation unit to reduce fluidized catalyst from entering the separation unit; and operating the fluidic catalytic cracker reactor to evacuate hydrocarbon gases from the bed of fluidized catalyst and into the separation unit.

2. The process of claim 1, wherein the bed of fluidized catalyst has an operating level that falls within a range of 125 inches water column (IWC) to 170 IWC.

3. The process of claim 1, wherein the bed of fluidized catalyst has an operating level that falls within a range of about 130 IWC to about 160 IWC.

4. The process of claim 1, wherein the hydrocarbon gases evacuate from the bed of fluidized catalyst through at least one vent tube which carries the hydrocarbon gases directly to a top region of the separation unit.

5. A process for increasing hydrocarbon yield and decreasing coke production in a fluidic catalytic cracker reactor having a separation unit, the process comprising: positioning a catalyst bed in the fluidic catalytic cracker reactor below a baffle member that is positioned proximate a bottom region of the separation unit; and utilizing at least one vent tube to carry hydrocarbon gases from the catalyst bed, through the baffle member, and to a top region of the separation unit.

6. The process of claim 5, wherein a level of the catalyst bed falls within a range of 130 IWC to 160 IWC.

7. The process of claim 5, wherein the catalyst bed has an operating level that falls within a range of 125 IWC to 170 IWC.

8. The process of claim 5, wherein the bottom region of the separation unit has one or more separator windows.

9. The process of claim 8, wherein the baffle member at least partially passes through the one or more separator windows.

10. The process of claim 1, wherein the hydrocarbon gases evacuate from the bed of fluidized catalyst through at least one vent tube which passes the hydrocarbon gases through the baffle member to a top region of the separation unit.

11. The process of claim 1, further comprising passing the hydrocarbon gases evacuated into the separation unit to one or more cyclones.

12. The process of claim 1, wherein the bottom portion of the separation unit includes a window.

13. The process of claim 12, wherein the baffle member at least partially passes through the window.

Description

IN THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a schematic of a FCC reactor incorporating a first embodiment of the present invention.

(2) FIG. 2 is a schematic of an FCC reactor incorporating another embodiment of the invention.

(3) FIG. 3 is a schematic of a FCC reactor incorporating yet another embodiment of the present invention.

(4) FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of catalyst temperature response to decreased catalyst levels in the reactor.

(5) FIG. 5 shows the results of two test runs of the present invention.

(6) FIG. 6 is a graph of the results of varying the catalyst bed elevation for a variety of fluidized bed density levels for the test runs of FIG. 5.

(7) FIGS. 7a-i are product yield graphs at varying catalyst bed levels in the reactor for the test runs of FIG. 5.

(8) FIG. 8 shows the results of a third test run of the present invention on another FCC reactor at a different location.

(9) FIG. 9 shows the dry gas and regenerator temperature shifts at varying catalyst bed levels for the test of FIG. 8.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

(10) Referring now to FIG. 1, a schematic depicting a FCC reactor incorporating a first embodiment of the invention is shown having a lowered fluidized catalyst bed 22 maintained just above the windows 32 of the separator or VSS 14. The reactor 10 includes an inlet 12 for receiving a mixture of heated crude oil and heated catalyst. The crude and catalyst mixture travels up the riser 13 during which the catalyst and crude interact and the catalyst absorbs carbon, metals, and other deleterious materials not wanted in the hydrocarbon gases. As the entrained hydrocarbon/catalyst mixture exits the riser and enters the separator 14 the catalyst will fall downward through the separator 14 while the clean hydrocarbon stream continues to rise where it is received by cyclones 16 which serve to further separate any remaining catalyst from the hydrocarbon stream. The cleansed hydrocarbon stream then exits the reactor through outlet 18 to be transferred to separation equipment, such as a fractionator. The separated catalyst located in the cyclone flows down the dipleg 20 and is reentered into the catalyst bed 22. Any hydrocarbon gases that become entrained with the falling catalyst will reenter the fluidized catalyst bed 22 for further separation and those gases will flow upwardly as shown by flow arrows H. The catalyst bed 22 is fluidized by high pressure steam being injected in the reactor 10 through steam inlet 26. The spent catalyst will exit the reactor at exit 24 and, most commonly, will be sent to a regenerator for cleansing. The regenerated catalyst is then reentered with the crude mixture at inlet 12.

(11) The hydrocarbon gases that become entrained with the falling catalyst enter the fluidized catalyst bed and are processed until they become cleansed hydrocarbon gases. The cleansed hydrocarbon gases will rise through the separator and will be captured by the cyclones 16.

(12) In the prior art at FCC units, not shown, there is a common effect at the lower level of the separator 14, wherein the hydrocarbon gases and catalyst recirculate above the fluidized bed 22. This recirculation creates an inefficiency in the operation of the reactor as the catalyst and hydrocarbons continue to react, resulting in decreased hydrocarbon yield and increased catalyst fouling. Increased catalyst fouling leads to increased heat expenditure when the catalyst is sent to the regenerator for cleansing. Increased regenerator temperatures create inefficiencies in the operation of the system. The present invention seeks to solve the catalyst/hydrocarbon recirculation issues in the lower portion of the separator 14.

(13) In the prior art, not shown, the fluidized bed 22 was maintained well above the top of the separator windows 32, preferably at 180 inches water column (“IWC”). In the FIG. 1 embodiment the fluidized bed has been lowered to approximately 150 IWC and yield has been improved as exhibited in FIGS. 4-9.

(14) The reactor of FIG. 1 is shown having the top level of the catalyst bed 22 located directly above the windows 32 of the separator 14. Referring to FIG. 3, it can be seen that when the catalyst bed level in the reactor ranges between 130 and 160 IWC or directly above the separator 14 windows 32, the catalyst temperature being delivered from the regenerator is much lower, resulting in higher efficiencies.

(15) Referring now to FIG. 5, the yield results from two test runs of the present invention on the same FCC reactor, for the various products produced by the catalytic cracking are shown. The yield plots on the tables show total hydrocarbon production increasing or remaining stable as the result of decreased overall cracking due to the lower bed levels for the catalyst. Delta coke is also decreased indicating more valuable product being recovered. Due to increased product recovery and decreased over cracking, the reactor operations are made more efficient.

(16) FIG. 6 graphically represents proposed more efficient operating levels for the catalyst bed elevation, using a variety of fluidized bed density levels. The most efficient operating levels range from 125 IWC for the least dense fluidized catalyst to 170 IWC for the most dense fluidized catalyst. The catalyst bed levels are optimally located just above the VSS windows 32.

(17) FIGS. 7a-i show the product yield graphs for the tests of FIG. 5. During the first test, the reactor outlet temperature was 970° F. compared with a reactor outlet temperature of 950° F. during the second test. The difference in reactor outlet temperature is the reason for the offsets in the yields shown in FIGS. 7a-i. Again, it can be seen that lower catalyst bed levels result in increased yield and decreased temperatures.

(18) Referring now to FIG. 2, the FCC unit is shown having the top level of the catalyst bed 22 located below the windows 32 of the separator 14. Under proper gas flow rates and hydraulic balance, hydrocarbon gases will bypass the separator 14 and exit the reactor, lowering hydrocarbon/catalyst residence time in the separator 14.

(19) Referring now to FIG. 3, the invention provides another alternative structure to assist in the effort to separate clean hydrocarbon gases from the fluidized catalyst efficiently. The alternative structure includes a baffle member 28 positioned immediately under the separator 14. The structure allows for the optimal level for the catalyst bed 22 to be further lowered as shown. Baffle 28 prevents any fluidized catalyst from entering the separation chamber 14. Hydrocarbon gases escape the fluidized bed after residence in the stripper 15 and fluidized bed 22 through vent tubes 30 which carry the clean hydrocarbon gases directly to the upper most region of the separator, allowing those gases to be passed to the cyclones 16.

(20) Another example of a test run of the present invention at a different location and on a different reactor from that as shown in FIG. 5 is shown in FIG. 8. The data shown in FIG. 8 and FIG. 9 proves improved yield selectivities and the dry gas and regenerator temperature shifts associated with lower catalyst inventory. The delta yields for a 26-28% lowered catalyst inventory in the reactor shows significant improvement. In both volume percent and weight percent.

(21) The above detailed description of the present invention is given for explanatory purposes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be construed in an illustrative and not a limitative sense, the scope of the invention being defined solely by the appended claims.