Dynamic multi-legs ejector for use in emergency flare gas recovery system
11092334 · 2021-08-17
Assignee
Inventors
- Samusideen Adewale Salu (Ras Tanura, SA)
- Mohamed A. Soliman (Ras Tanura, SA)
- Nisar Ahmad K. Ansari (Ras Tanura, SA)
Cpc classification
F23G5/50
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23G7/085
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23G7/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23K2400/20
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23K5/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23N2241/12
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F23G7/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23G5/50
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23K5/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A system and method for recycling flare gas back to a processing facility that selectively employs different numbers of ejector legs depending on the flare gas flowrate. The ejector legs include ejectors piped in parallel, each ejector has a flare gas inlet and a motive fluid inlet. Valves are disposed in piping upstream of the flare gas and motive fluid inlets on the ejectors, and that are selectively opened or closed to allow flow through the ejectors. The flowrate of the flare gas is monitored and distributed to a controller, which is programmed to calculate the required number of ejector legs to accommodate the amount of flare gas. The controller is also programmed to direct signals to actuators attached to the valves, which open or close the valves to change the capacity of the ejector legs so they can handle changing flowrates of the flare gas.
Claims
1. A system for handling a flow of flare gas comprising: a piping circuit comprising legs of tubulars piped in parallel that are selectively online; an ejector in each of the legs and where a one of the ejectors has a design flowrate that is approximately equal to an anticipated minimum flowrate of the flare gas, each ejector comprising, a low pressure inlet in selective communication with a source of the flare gas, a high pressure inlet in selective communication with a source of motive gas, and a mixing portion where flare gas and motive gas form a combination; a controller system for bringing a quantity of the legs online that have a cumulative capacity that is at least as great as a measured flowrate of the flare gas, and maintains a pressure of the motive gas at the motive gas inlet at a substantially constant value; and a discharge gas header having an end coupled with a processing facility, and that selectively receives a flow of the combination.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein a number of the legs of tubulars is approximately equal to an anticipated maximum flowrate of the flare gas divided by the design flowrate of the ejectors.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein all of the ejectors have the same design flowrate.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein some of the ejectors have different design flowrates.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein a total number of the legs is substantially equal to an anticipated maximum flowrate of the flare gas divided by the anticipated minimum flowrate of the flare gas.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein a pressure of the flare gas at the lower pressure inlet is at a substantially constant value.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein a pressure of the motive gas at the high pressure inlet is at a substantially constant value.
8. The system of claim 1, further comprising a flare header that selectively receives a portion of the flow of the flare gas from the flare gas supply, and directs the portion to a flare.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1) Some of the features and benefits of that in the present disclosure having been stated, others will become apparent as the description proceeds when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5) While that disclosed will be described in connection with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit that embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as may be included within the spirit and scope of that described.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(6) The method and system of the present disclosure will now be described more fully after with reference to the accompanying drawings in which embodiments are shown. The method and system of the present disclosure may be in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the illustrated embodiments set forth; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey its scope to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout. In an embodiment, usage of the term “about” includes +/−5% of the cited magnitude. In an embodiment, usage of the term “substantially” includes +/−5% of the cited magnitude.
(7) It is to be further understood that the scope of the present disclosure is not limited to the exact details of construction, operation, exact materials, or embodiments shown and described, as modifications and equivalents will be apparent to one skilled in the art. In the drawings and specification, there have been disclosed illustrative embodiments and, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for the purpose of limitation.
(8) Schematically illustrated in
(9) As illustrated in this example, motive gas header 30 connects to the motive gas source 18, and which provides fluid communication from the motive gas source 18 to motive gas inlet leads 32.sub.1-n. The motive gas inlet leads 32.sub.1-n of this example extend from points along the motive gas header 30 and into connection with motive gas inlets 34.sub.1-n provided on ends of the ejectors 24.sub.1-n. Included in the embodiment shown are motive gas inlet valves 36.sub.1-n that are set in line within the motive gas inlet leads 32.sub.1-n, and like the flare gas inlet valves 28.sub.1-n, are opened and closed to selectively block flow of motive gas to ones of the ejectors 24.sub.1-n. Actuators 37.sub.1-n are included in this embodiment that mount to motive gas inlet valves 36.sub.1-n, for opening and closing these valves 36.sub.1-n.
(10) In an example of operation, motive gas enters the ejectors 24.sub.1-n via motive gas inlets 34.sub.1-n and subsequently flows through reduced cross-sectional areas within ejectors 24.sub.1-n where velocities of the motive gas increase and its pressures reduce. In one embodiment, the ejectors 24.sub.1-n are strategically configured so that the pressures of the motive gas reduce within the reduced cross-sectional areas of ejectors 24.sub.1-n to below that of the flare gas at the flare gas inlets 26.sub.1-n. Further in this embodiment, pressure differentials between the motive gas in the reduced cross-sectional areas of ejectors 24.sub.1-n and the flare gas at the flare gas inlets 26.sub.1-n draw the flare gas into gas ejectors 24.sub.1-n where it is combined with the motive gas. The cross-sectional areas of the flow paths within ejectors 24.sub.1-n in this example increase on sides of the reduced cross-sectional areas with distance away from the motive gas inlets 34.sub.1-n, and which define ejector venturi 38.sub.1-n. Inside the ejector venturi 38.sub.1-n, velocities of the combinations of the motive and flare gas decrease, and pressures of the combinations increase. In the illustrated example, the motive gas and flare gas are mixed in the ejector venturi 38.sub.1-n. In this example, discharge ends of the ejector venturi 38.sub.1-n are in fluid communication with discharge gas leads 40.sub.1-n, so that the mixed fluid exiting the ejector venturi 38.sub.1-n is directed to the discharge gas leads 40.sub.1-n.
(11) Still referring to the example of
(12) Further schematically illustrated in the embodiment of
(13)
(14) Further in the example of
(15) Still referring to the example of
(16) A water seal drum 100A is illustrated in this example of
(17) Still referring to
(18) Example scenarios of flare gas releases to a flare system include pressure safety relieving, automatic blow-down (depressurizing), manual depressurization (such as venting during maintenance). Transient flow-rates associated with the pressure safety relieving scenario can occur when equipment or piping systems are over pressured and reach a relief valve or rupture disc set point that was installed to protect equipment or piping. Flowrates for this scenario can be considered to be continuous when relieving due to a blocked discharge. In an example a pressure safety relieving instance has a limited duration of time of about maximum 10-15 minutes as the relieving rate ceases once the source of overpressure is isolated or eliminated.
(19) In one example, automatic blow-down (depressurizing) occurs due to process plant safety requirements. Here, each pressurized system is to be protected against the possibility of rupture under fire conditions by providing automatic isolation valves at key system boundaries and a blow-down valve for each system/segment of the entire plant based on the fire isolation philosophy of the plant. In the event of fire in a particular segment of the processing facility 14, the isolation valves (not shown) will automatically closed while the blow-down valve (not shown) will automatically opened and each system will be depressurized to a specific limit within a given time. API RP 521 (6.sup.th edition, 2014) recommends depressurizing to 6.9 bar gauge or 50% of (vessel) design pressure, whichever is the lower, within 15 minutes. This is achievable by using a control valve or alternatively by using a combination of automated isolation valve (blow-down valve) with fixed orifice downstream. In one embodiment, the blow-down valve opens fully automatically on demand. Compressors are optionally blown-down automatically on shutdown to protect the machine from surging damage or to prevent gas escape through the compressor seals.
(20) An example step of manual depressurization/venting for maintenance occurs to shutdown, isolate, or take a particular segment of a process plant out of service for maintenance purposes. An example of this procedure requires venting out all the gas inventories of the system to the flare. In this example, operators open a manual isolation valve to depressurize the content of the system until minimum pressure possible is attained. Subsequently, the inventory remaining is removed using higher pressure nitrogen or steam as purge gas.
(21) An example of how flowrate of flare gas release varies over time is depicted in graphical form in
(22) In one example of designing the emergency flare gas recovery system 10 of
(23) A further example step of designing the emergency flare gas recovery system 10, the anticipated maximum and minimum flare gas flowrates Q.sub.max, Q.sub.min are identified. In this example, the anticipated maximum flare gas flowrate Q.sub.max is highest flowrate estimated from the identified relieving scenarios, and the anticipated minimum flare gas flowrate Q.sub.min is the lowest flowrate estimated from the identified relieving scenarios. Thus the maximum and minimum flare gas flowrates Q.sub.max, Q.sub.min in this example are not necessarily that which are anticipated to occur in the same relieving scenario, but examples exist where the flowrates Q.sub.max, Q.sub.min are taken from different relieving scenarios. For the purposes of discussion herein, the maximum flare gas flowrate Q.sub.max is referred to as a maximum anticipated flowrate of flare gas, and the minimum flare gas flowrate Q.sub.min is referred to as a minimum anticipated flowrate of flare gas. Further in this example, a ratio is obtained by dividing the value of the maximum flare gas flowrate Q.sub.max by the value of the minimum flare gas flowrate Q.sub.min The value of the ratio in this example is used to set a quantity of ejector legs 41.sub.1-n that are to be installed in the emergency flare gas recovery system 10. In this example, the number of ejector legs 41.sub.1-n that are to be installed have a cumulative capacity to be able to adequately handle flare gas at a flowrate that is at least as large as the maximum flare gas flowrate Q.sub.max. Further in this example, each of the ejector legs 41.sub.1-n to be installed has a capacity to be able to adequately handle flare gas at a flowrate that is at least as large as, or is equal to minimum flare gas flowrate Q.sub.min. In an alternative, ejectors 24.sub.1-n in the ejector legs 41.sub.1-n are sized based on a minimum capacity of flow to be at least that of minimum flare gas flowrate Q.sub.min, with suction gas pressure equal to the release pressure of the water seal drum 100A, and a discharge pressure at around that of header 42, 42A. Sizing of the ejectors to have a particular design flow (which in this embodiment is the minimum flare gas flowrate Q.sub.min), is well within the capabilities of those skilled in the art. Embodiments exist where capacities of each of the ejectors 24.sub.1-n are substantially the same, or where the capacities of the individual ejectors 24.sub.1-n vary. Installing ejectors 24.sub.1-n of different capacities provides the emergency flare gas recovery system 10 with flexibility to be configured into numerous discrete capacities and adequately handle a wide range of flowrates of flare gas. For example, if a minimum flow is at around 20,000 pounds an hour, but other sustained expected flows exceed the minimum flow by less than 20,000, the scenario includes installing an ejector having a capacitor of around 20,000 and additional ejectors having capacities of something less than 20,000 pounds an hour.
(24) In a non-limiting example of operation, information about the flare gas, such as flowrate, properties, and conditions, is received by the controller 44 (
(25) In an example step, controller 44 determines which of the ejector legs 41.sub.1-n to put online based upon the received signal data representing the information from within flare gas header 20. The determination by the controller 44 identifies the ejector legs 41.sub.1-n so the emergency flare gas recovery system 10 adequately handles flare gas in the flare gas header 20. One example of adequately handling flare gas in the flare gas header 20 includes directing flare gas received from the flare gas header 20 through the ejector legs 41.sub.1-n at substantially the flowrate of flare gas flowing from the flare gas header 20. In this example, adequately handling the flare gas includes directing the flare gas into the discharge gas header 42 at a pressure sufficient for entry into the processing facility 14. Thus in this example pressure losses in the system 10 of the flare gas are suppressed so the flare gas is at least at the sufficient pressure. Further in this example, controller 44 is configured to identify the flow of flare gas and divert the amount of flare gas to one or more ejector legs 41.sub.1-n whose cumulative capacities correspond to (i.e. are substantially similar in magnitude) the flowrate of the flare gas flowing in flare gas header 20. Thus in an example, the flare gas in the flare gas header 20 is adequately handled when the cumulative capacity or capacities of the leg or legs 41.sub.1-n corresponds to the flowrate of the flare gas.
(26) In situations where the capacities of the ejectors 24.sub.1-n have the same individual capacity, the required capacity is divided by the individual capacity to obtain a quotient, and the number of ejector legs 41.sub.1-n put online is equal to the quotient. Alternatively, the quotient is rounded to the nearest integer, and the number of ejector legs 41.sub.1-n put online is equal to that integer. In an optional example, pressure at inlets 26.sub.1, 34.sub.1-n is maintained substantially constant, such as by manipulation of valves 28.sub.1, 36.sub.1-n. Further optionally, valve 36.sub.1-n is selectively controlled to adjust pressure and/or flowrate of motive gas to ejectors 24.sub.1-n to accommodate for any changes in the terminal pressure of discharge gas header 42.
(27) In an alternative example of operation, the particular ejector legs 41.sub.1-n put online have ejectors 24.sub.1-n of different capacities, but because ejector 24.sub.1-n capacity information is accessibly by the controller 44, the cumulative capacities are of sufficient magnitude so that the ejector legs 41.sub.1-n put online adequately handle the flow of flare gas. An alternative to this example exists where the calculation to determine the number of ejector legs 41.sub.1-n to put online considers multiple combinations of ejector legs 41.sub.1-n having different capacities, and selects the scenario having a minimum number of ejector legs 41.sub.1-n that are online. In this alternative, a scenario of one leg having a larger capacity in conjunction with two legs of smaller capacity would be selected over a scenario of four legs of smaller capacity.
(28) Further, it should be pointed out that the motive gas valves 36.sub.1-n in one example act as control valves whose cross-sectional areas are adjusted incrementally to vary the flow of motive gas to the ejectors 24.sub.1-n to selected designated values so that operation of the ejectors 24.sub.1-n is in accordance with the design. In an alternative, the difference in time between subsequent process calculations is approximately the time for the longest depressurization scenario divided by the number of ejector legs 41.sub.1-n. Thus, in this example if the longest depressurization scenario has a duration of 16 minutes, and 8 ejector legs 41.sub.1-n are online, then a time span between subsequent calculations will be about every 2 minutes. In this example, the controller 44 reassesses the flow of the flare gas and compares that flow to the capacity of the emergency flare gas recovery system 10 to adequately handle the flare gas flow. Further in this example, if changes in flare gas flow are detected, the controller 44 recalculates the capacity required to adequately handle the new flow, identifies ejector legs 41.sub.1-n having the required capacity, and sends instructions to open valves 28.sub.1-n, 36.sub.1-n so that the identified ejector legs 41.sub.1-n are put online. Thus alternatives exist where the system and method described herein reacts in real time to changing conditions of flare gas flow to continuously handle the flow of flare gas over changing conditions.
(29) The present disclosure, therefore, is well adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned, as well as others inherent. While a presently preferred embodiment of the disclosure has been given for purposes of disclosure, numerous changes exist in the details of procedures for accomplishing the desired results. In one embodiment, the vessels, valves, and associated instrumentation are all mounted onto a single skid unit. Optionally, screw type compressors are used in conjunction with or in place of the ejectors. These and other similar modifications will readily suggest themselves to those skilled in the art, and are intended to be encompassed within the spirit of the present disclosure and the scope of the appended claims.