Multilayer sheet structure
11090901 · 2021-08-17
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B32B2262/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2553/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B5/26
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2262/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B5/08
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2262/0238
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2262/14
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2307/718
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2262/08
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2590/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2262/065
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2262/062
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2250/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2410/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B5/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B32B3/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B5/26
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A fibrous multilayer sheet structure comprising at least one discontinuous fibrous layer having first and second surfaces and at least one layer of continuous melt spun fibers on the first surface of at least one of the at least one discontinuous fibrous layers wherein the fibers of the discontinuous fibrous layer are not melt blown fibers.
Claims
1. A fibrous multilayer sheet structure comprising at least one discontinuous fibrous layer consisting of synthetic pulp, the layer having first and second surfaces and at least one layer of continuous melt spun fibers on the first surface of at least one of the at least one discontinuous fibrous layers wherein the fibers of the discontinuous fibrous layer are not melt blown fibers and are of polyethylene, polypropylene, metallocene, olefin copolymers, polyester or blends thereof.
2. The sheet structure of claim 1 further comprising at least one layer of continuous melt spun fibers on the second surface of the discontinuous fibrous layer.
3. The sheet structure of claim 1 wherein the continuous melt spun fibers are polypropylene, metallocene, polyester or combinations thereof.
4. The sheet structure of claim 1 wherein the continuous and discontinuous fibers are monocomponent, bicomponent or multicomponent.
5. The sheet structure of claim 1 wherein the discontinuous and continuous fiber layers are formed and consolidated in a one-step process.
6. The sheet structure of claim 1 wherein the discontinuous fibrous layer has an areal weight of from 5 to 100 gsm.
7. The sheet structure of claim 1 wherein at least one continuous fibrous layer has an areal weight of from 5 to 500 gsm.
8. The sheet structure of claim 1 wherein the structure comprises at least two discontinuous fibrous layers each discontinuous fibrous layer having first and second surfaces, each discontinuous fibrous layer being separated from an adjacent discontinuous fibrous layer by at least one layer of continuous melt spun fibers.
9. The sheet structure of claim 1 wherein the continuous or discontinuous fibers are monocomponent, bicomponent or multicomponent.
10. The sheet structure of claim 1 wherein at least one layer comprises both continuous and discontinuous fiber regions.
11. An article comprising the sheet structure of claim 1.
12. The article of claim 11 wherein the article is a geotextile or landscaping structure.
13. A fibrous multilayer sheet structure comprising at least one discontinuous fibrous layer comprising synthetic nanofibers, the layer having first and second surfaces and at least one layer of continuous melt spun fibers on the first surface of at least one of the at least one discontinuous fibrous layers wherein the fibers of the discontinuous fibrous layer are not melt blown fibers and are of polyethylene, polypropylene, metallocene, olefin copolymers, polyester or blends thereof.
14. The sheet structure of claim 1 wherein the continuous melt spun fibers are polypropylene, metallocene, polyethylene, olefin copolymers, polyester, or combinations thereof.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(7) Multilayer Sheet Structure
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12) Other embodiments may also be envisaged such as CCDDCC, CDCDC, CCCDDCC or CDDCDDC where C is a layer of continuous melt spun fibers and D is a discontinuous fibrous layer.
(13) In one embodiment of a CCDCC structure, the D layer has an areal weight of no greater than 30 gsm. Typically, the multilayer sheet structure has an areal weight of no greater than 100 gsm, an air permeability of no greater than 100 m.sup.3 m.sup.−2 min.sup.−1 and a pore size no greater than 150 micrometers. More preferably the pore size is no greater than 120 micrometers.
(14) In yet another embodiment of a CCDCC structure, the D layer has an areal weight of no greater than 100 gsm. The sheet structure has an areal weight of no greater than 600 gsm, an air permeability of no greater than 100 m.sup.3 m.sup.−2 min.sup.−1 and a pore size no greater than 150 micrometers. More preferably the pore size is no greater than 120 micrometers.
(15)
(16) In other embodiments, each discontinuous fibrous layer has an areal weight range of from 5 gsm to 100 gsm. In yet other embodiments, the total areal weight of each continuous melt spun filamentary layer ranges from 5 gsm to 500 gsm.
(17) The C and D layers may be of the same or different chemical composition.
(18) Discontinuous Fibrous Layer
(19) The fibers of the discontinuous fibrous layer are not melt blown fibers. Melt blowing is a method of making micro- and nanofibers where a polymer melt is extruded through small nozzles surrounded by high speed blowing gas. The randomly deposited fibers form a nonwoven sheet product.
(20) The discontinuous fibers include pulps and nanofibers. In this context, a nanofiber is a fiber having at least one-dimension of less than one micrometer.
(21) The discontinuous fibers may be synthetic fibers, natural fibers or blends thereof. Exemplary synthetic fibers include polyolefins and olefin copolymers (for example polypropylene, metallocene polypropylene or polyethylene), polyester, polysulfone, polyethersulfone, polyphenylsulfone, polyvinylidene fluoride, polylactic acid, polyvinylidene difluoride, polyimide, polyacrylonitrile, aromatic polyamide, ethylenevinyl alcohol copolymer, cellulose acetate or combinations thereof. The above synthetic or natural fibers may also be a bicomponent or multicomponent fiber which, in some embodiments, may be in the form of a sheath-core fiber or one in which the two components are side-by-side. In this latter case, the two-side-by side components may be twisted together. Exemplary natural fibers include cellulose, cellulosic fiber precursors, such as non-lignin free cellulose, and cellulose derivatives such as cotton, wood pulp, flax, hemp and viscose fibers as traditionally described (for example Wikipedia link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_textile_fibres) being for example from vegetable or animal sources. In some embodiments, discontinuous fibers have a length not exceeding 12 mm and a filament diameter not exceeding 11 dtex (10 denier). Cellulose acetate is also a suitable material for fiber. In a further embodiment, blends of natural and synthetic discontinuous fibers are used.
(22) The discontinuous fibers may be monocomponent, bicomponent or multicomponent fibers, such terms being well known in the textile art. In one embodiment, the fiber may be a bicomponent fiber having a polypropylene core and a lower melting polymer sheath or a polyester core and a lower melting co-polyester or polyolefin sheath.
(23) In some embodiments, at least one of the discontinuous fibrous layers comprises fibers of different dimensions i.e. length and/or diameter.
(24) In some embodiments, the discontinuous fibrous layer has an areal weight of from 5 to 100 gsm.
(25) Melt Spun Continuous Fibrous Layer
(26) The melt spun fibrous layer comprises continuous synthetic or embedded bio-based fibers. Further information on bio-based fibers may be found at a Wikipedia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bio-based_material. One such fiber is Sorona® available from Dow DuPont. In the context of this invention the terms fiber and filament are interchangeable.
(27) In melt spinning, the fiber-forming substance is melted for extrusion through a spinneret and then directly solidified by cooling. Melt spinning uses the heat to melt the polymer to a viscosity suitable for the extrusion through the spinneret. It is used for the polymers that are not decomposed or degraded by temperatures necessary for extrusion.
(28) Preferably the continuous melt spun fibers are polyolefins and olefin copolymers (such as polypropylene, metallocene polypropylene or polyethylene), polysulfone, polyethersulfone, polyphenylsulfone, polyvinylidene fluoride, polyvinylidene difluoride, polyimide, polyacrylonitrile, polyester, aromatic polyamide, ethylenevinyl alcohol copolymer or cellulose acetate.
(29) Exemplary bio-based fibers include polylactide and cellulose derivatives which are chemically and/or biologically modified forms of cellulose that are for example used in food processing (see Encyclopedia.com at https://www.encyclopedia.com/education/dictionaries . . . pictures . . . /cellulose-derivatives).
(30) The continuous fibers may be monocomponent, bicomponent or multicomponent. In some embodiments, the continuous melt spun fibrous layer has an areal weight of from 5 to 500 gsm.
(31) In some embodiments, at least one of the continuous fibrous layers comprises fibers of different dimensions i.e. diameter and/or cross section and may further comprise nanoparticles.
(32) Method of Making a Sheet Structure
(33) Preferably the sheet structure is made by a method in which the discontinuous and continuous fiber layers are formed and consolidated in a one-step process. Such a method is shown in
(34) The equipment consists of a laydown belt such as a continuous belt 51. The belt moves in the direction of the arrow. Above the belt are the required number of units necessary to make the desired number of continuous and discontinuous fibrous layers in the sheet structure. In
(35) Article
(36) A wide range of articles can be made using the multilayer sheet structures described herein. These include, but are not limited to, geotextiles such as for drainage, landscaping structures or sport ground components; piezoelectric textiles; energy harvesting areas; advertising designs; medical packaging; filtration; gas storage vessels; building materials such as house wrap, walling and under-roofing covers; sound insulating or absorption materials; a filtering material such as food filters, air filters, liquid filters, vacuum cleaner filters; membrane support; hygiene or medical materials such as protective clothing, disposable diapers, sterilization wraps, medical filters or desiccant packs.
Test Methods
(37) Tensile strength and elongation was measured according to DIN EN 29073-3 (1992). Basis weight (mass per unit area) was measured according to BS EN ISO 9864 (2005). Determination of the thickness of each layer was determined according to EN ISO 9863-1 (2016). Determination of the characteristic opening (pore) size of a sheet structure was performed according to EN ISO 12956 (2010) based on calibrated sand grain sieving. The 090 is an optical method to determine the opening (pore) size and is correlated to ISO 12956 (2010). Test method for trapezoid tearing strength of a sheet structure was measured according to ASTM D4533-91 (1996). Air permeability of textile fabrics was determined as per ISO 9237:1995.
EXAMPLES
(38) The following examples are given to illustrate the invention and should not be interpreted as limiting it in any way. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated. Examples prepared according to the process or processes of the current invention are indicated by numerical values. Control or Comparative Examples are indicated by letters. Data and test results relating to the Comparative and Inventive Examples are shown in Tables 1 to 4.
(39) In the tables, “SST MD” is the tensile strength (using 50×200 mm samples) by test method DIN EN 29073-3 (1992) in the machine direction and “SST XD” is the tensile strength (using 50×200 mm samples) in the cross-machine direction. “Elong MD” is the elongation at break in the machine direction and “Elong XD” is the elongation at break in the cross-machine direction. “TTMD” is the trapezoid tear in the machine direction and “TTXD” is the trapezoid tear in the cross-machine direction. “Air Perm” is air permeability. “090” and “090E” are the pore size measurements, determined by optical means and physical separation (sieving) respectively. Machine direction and cross-direction are well known terms in the laminating and textile arts.
(40) Samples were measured on at 17 different places for each sheet structure and the values quoted are the average of these values.
(41) All examples were made on a 600 mm wide conventional lay-down machine.
Example 1
(42) Example 1 was a CCDCC construction having a total areal weight of 78 gsm. The combination of C layers replicated Typar® 3207 spunbonded nonwoven fabric of continuous polypropylene filaments commercially available from Dow DuPont, Wilmington, Del. and having an areal weight of 68 gsm. The fiber of the D layers was polypropylene. The D layer weighed 10 gsm and comprised short melt spun fibers (i.e. not melt blown) of polypropylene having a nominal dtex of 1.7 (1.5 denier). The sheet structure was made as outlined in
Comparative Example A
(43) The sheet structure was a Dow DuPont commercial product, Typar® 3207, having a four layer CCCC construction and weighing 68 gsm. Each layer comprised spunbonded nonwoven fabric of continuous polypropylene filaments. The sheet structure was made as outlined in
Comparative Example B
(44) The sheet structure weighing 150 gsm was also a CCCC construction comprising four layers and is a commercially available spunbonded nonwoven fabric of continuous polypropylene filaments. The material is available from Dow DuPont as Typar® SF44. The sheet structure was made as outlined in
(45) The properties of these three examples are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
(46) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Layer D Fiber Layer D Fiber Sheet Structure Example Type Amount (gsm) Weight (gsm) Example 1 Polypropylene 10 78 Comparative A None 0 68 Comparative B None 0 150
(47) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 SST Elong SST Elong Air MD MD XD XD TTMD TTXD Perm O90 Example (N) (%) (N) (%) (N) (N) (m.sup.3m.sup.−2 min.sup.−1) (microns) 1 191 44 185 50 165 156 58 81 Comp. A 146 38 140 47 163 179 141 127 Comp. B 398 40 441 40 375 380 80 80
Example 2
(48) Example 2 was a CCDCC construction having a total areal weight of 84 gsm. The total areal weight of all four C layers was 74 gsm. The layers were similar to Typar® 3207 previously described but of a lower areal weight. The D layer weighed 10 gsm and comprised short melt spun bicomponent fibers having a polypropylene core and a polyethylene sheath. The fiber had a nominal dtex of 1.7 (1.5 denier). The sheet structure was made as outlined in
Comparative Example C
(49) The multilayer sheet structure was a CCCC construction weighing 240 gsm and comprised four layers. Such a structure is commercially available as Typar® SF70 from Dow DuPont. Each layer comprised spunbonded nonwoven fabric of continuous polypropylene filaments. The multilayer sheet structure was made as outlined in
Comparative Example D
(50) The multilayer sheet structure was a CCCC construction weighing 125 gsm and comprised four layers. Such a structure is commercially available as Typar® VD37 from Dow DuPont. Each layer comprises spunbonded nonwoven sheets of continuous polypropylene filaments. The multilayer was made as outlined in
Comparative Example E
(51) The multilayer sheet structure was a CCCC construction weighing 90 gsm and comprised four layers. Such a structure is commercially available from Dow DuPont as Typar® SF27. Each layer comprises spunbonded nonwoven sheets of continuous polypropylene filaments. The multilayer was made as outlined in
(52) The properties of these four examples are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.
(53) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Layer D Fiber Layer D Fiber Sheet Structure Example Type Amount (gsm) Weight (gsm) Example 2 Polypropylene 10 84 Core & Polyethylene Sheath Comparative C None 0 240 Comparative D None 0 125 Comparative E None 0 90
(54) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 SST Elong SST Elong Air MD MD XD XD TTMD TTXD Perm O90 O90E Example (N) (%) (N) (%) (N) (N) (m.sup.3m.sup.−2 min.sup.−1) (μ) (μ) 2 237 38 237 39 133 158 40 75 71 Comp. C 720 48 772 43 544 539 76 62 77 Comp. D 422 42 362 42 236 164 16 61 71 Comp E 227 29 227 38 226 226 87 112 nm nm = not measured
(55) The results shown in the above tables illustrate the advantages of the inventive concept. Two features are particularly noticeable when the characteristics of sheet structures are “normalized” by basis weight, this type of normalization comparison being very common in the textile industry: (i) for a lower basis weight, the inventive samples offer either an improved or comparable mechanical strength and (ii) for a lower basis weight, the inventive samples offer either a reduced or comparable pore size which is a relevant property for many industrial applications.