Auger for grinding polyurethane for a tire filling machine

Abstract

An auger for a grinder material for a tire filling machine, having: a cylindrical column; and a plurality of flights extending outwardly from the cylindrical core, wherein (i) the flights are arranged in pairs extending radially outwards from the cylindrical column at 180 degrees to one another, and (ii) each flight has a sharpened leading edge. Each pair of flights are positioned at angles of approximately 50 or 60 degrees to one another, and each flight extends approximately half way around the circumference of the cylindrical column, and there are no outer edge notches in the flights.

Claims

1. A grinding system for grinding polyurethane, comprising: a single auger for a grinder for a tire filling machine wherein the single auger both grinds polyurethane and transports ground polyurethane, the single auger comprising: a cylindrical column having a first end and a second end; and a repeating pattern of three flight pairs extending outwardly from the cylindrical column, wherein (i) the flights are arranged in pairs extending radially outwards from the cylindrical column at 180 degrees to one another, and (ii) each flight has a sharpened leading edge and a trailing edge in a rotational direction, wherein the sharpened leading edge of each flight is disposed closer to the first end of the cylindrical column and the trailing edge of each flight is disposed closer to the second end of the cylindrical column, and (iii) all of the flights twist in the same longitudinal direction; a cylindrical housing around the bottom and sides of the auger, wherein clearance distances between the bottom and sides of the auger and the cylindrical housing therearound are dimensioned to grind the polyurethane therein; an input section on the cylindrical housing, the input section being positioned above the auger; and a screen plate at a forward end of the cylindrical housing.

2. The auger of claim 1, wherein each pair of flights extends approximately half way around the circumference of the cylindrical column.

3. The auger of claim 1, wherein the sharpened leading edges of each pair of flights are positioned at 180 degrees to one another.

4. The auger of claim 1, wherein the trailing edges of each pair of flights are positioned at 180 degrees to one another.

5. The auger of claim 1, wherein each flight extends to the same radial distance from the center of the cylindrical column around the entire circumference of the flight such that there are no outer edge notches in the flights.

6. The auger of claim 1, wherein successive pairs of flights are positioned at angles of approximately 50 or 60 degrees to one another.

7. The auger of claim 6, wherein three successive pairs of flights together completely extend around the cylindrical column such that the entire circumference of the cylinder is covered by three successive pairs of flights.

8. The auger of claim 1, wherein the auger comprises 2 sets of 3 pairs of flights.

9. The auger of claim 8, wherein the flights on the auger comprises at least 12 sharpened leading edges.

10. The auger of claim 1, wherein the ratio of the outer diameter of the cylindrical column to the outer diameter of the flights is 0.45 to 0.65.

11. The auger of claim 1, wherein the sharpened leading edges are each cut with a 1:7 blade edge.

12. The auger of claim 1, wherein the auger is made of T1 armored steel.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(1) FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the Applicant's pre-existing auger.

(2) FIG. 2 is a front perspective view of the present auger.

(3) FIG. 3 is a rear perspective view of the present auger.

(4) FIG. 4 is a side elevation view of the present auger.

(5) FIG. 5A is a sectional view taken along line 5A-5A in FIG. 4.

(6) FIG. 5B is a sectional view taken along line 5B-5B in FIG. 4.

(7) FIG. 5C is a sectional view taken along line 5C-5C in FIG. 4.

(8) FIG. 6 illustrates the sharpened leading edge of one of the flights.

(9) FIG. 7 is an illustration of present auger positioned within the housing of main grinder.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(10) As stated in the Background Section above, the present auger was designed to function well with grinding the new tougher material. As such, the present auger involved a number of non-obvious design changes from the Applicant's pre-existing auger (seen in FIG. 1). When designing the present auger, the Applicant performed numerous design tests and experiments. A large number of factors had to be re-designed, and these new features had to be tested together. Altering any one design factor had an impact on the other design factors. All of these changes needed to be balanced off against one another, and multiple iterations of the present auger design had to be performed to achieve the final design.

(11) For example, variables including, but not limited to, the following all had to be simultaneously designed, tested, and balanced off against one another: (a) the diameter of cylindrical column vs. the diameter of flights; (b) the radial position of the flights around the cylindrical column, and how far each of the flights extend around the cylindrical column; (c) the number of flights that are to be positioned around the cylindrical column; (d) the distance the flights extend along the length of the cylindrical column; (e) the thickness of the flights; (f) the presence or absence of notches in the flights; (g) the overlap (or underlap) of the flights around the cylindrical column; (h) the angle of attack of the flights; (i) the presence or absence of sharpened leading edges of the flights; and (j) the axial separation distances between the flights, and whether these distances are uniform or vary along the axial length of the cylindrical column.

(12) As best seen in FIGS. 2 and 3, the present auger 10 for a grinder for a tire filling machine is provided. Auger 10 comprises: a cylindrical column 20; and a plurality of flights 30 extending outwardly from the cylindrical core.

(13) Flights 30 are arranged in pairs extending radially outwards from the cylindrical column at 180 degrees to one another. For example, as seen in FIGS. 4 to 5C, flights 30A and 30B are positioned opposite to one another. Similarly, flights 30C and 30D are positioned opposite to one another. Similarly, flights 30E and 30F are positioned opposite to one another. Each flight 30 has a sharpened leading edge 31A, 31B, 31C, 31D, 31E and 31F.

(14) As can also be seen, each pair of flights extends approximately half way around the circumference of the cylindrical column. For example, flights 30A and 30B together extend ½ way around cylinder 20. As such the sharpened leading edges of each pair of flights (e.g.: 31A and 31B) are positioned at 180 degrees to one another. Moreover, trailing edges 32A and 32B are also positioned at 180 degrees to one another.

(15) Preferably, there are no outer edge notches in the flights (in contrast to notches 4 in the pre-existing design shown in FIG. 1). As such, each flight 30 extends fully to the same radial distance away from the center of cylindrical column 20 around its entire circumference.

(16) FIG. 4 shows the relative positions of the pairs of flights 30 around the circumference of cylinder 20. As seen by comparing FIGS. 4, 5A, 5B and 5C, successive pairs of flights (i.e.: 30A/30B is a first pair, and 30C/30D being the second pair) are positioned at angles of approximately 50 or 60 degrees to one another. As a result, only three successive pairs of flights are needed to completely extend around cylindrical column 20 such that the entire circumference of the cylinder 20 is covered by these three successive pairs of flights 30.

(17) As can also be seen in FIG. 4, auger 10 may comprise two sets of these three pairs of flights. In other words, the sectional views 5A-5A, 5B-5B and 5C-5C are repeated twice on FIG. 4. As such, auger 10 may have twelve sharpened leading edges 31. This provides excellent cutting advantages that were simply not possible with the pre-existing auger 1 of FIG. 1.

(18) In addition, in preferred aspects, the diameter of cylinder 20 is small as compared to the full outer diameter of flights 30. This offer the advantage of a greater internal work volume for performing the grinding operation. In optional preferred aspects, the ratio of the outer diameter of the cylindrical column 20 to the outer diameter of the flights 30 is 0.45 to 0.65.

(19) Lastly, FIG. 6 shows an example of a sharpened leading edge 31 that is cut with a 1:7 blade edge. This sharpness also provides excellent cutting advantages that were simply not possible with the pre-existing auger.

(20) In preferred embodiments, auger 10 is made of T1 armored steel giving extra strength advantages that were not possible with the pre-existing stainless steel auger.

(21) FIG. 7 is an illustration of the present auger positioned in the housing of a main grinder assembly as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,988,542 (Published Application 2002/0020351), incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. The main grinder assembly is shown in dotted lines for ease of illustration (i.e.: such that the present auger can be clearly viewed).