System and method for production of aluminum chloride derivatives
11840457 · 2023-12-12
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C01F7/786
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J19/0013
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
C01F7/786
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
A system for producing particles of aluminum chlorohydrate includes a feed stream configured to have a liquid solution of aluminum chloride, a conveyor belt having a surface configured to hold the liquid solution, a first radiant heat source configured to heat the liquid solution on the surface in order to form solid aluminum chloride hexahydrate, a grinder configured to crush the solid aluminum chloride hexahydrate in order to reduce an overall particle size of the aluminum chloride hexahydrate, and a second radiant heat source configured to heat the aluminum chloride hexahydrate in order to decompose the aluminum chloride hexahydrate and produce the particles of aluminum chlorohydrate. Methods of producing particles of aluminum chlorohydrate are also disclosed.
Claims
1. A method of producing particles of aluminum chlorohydrate, the method comprising: providing a liquid solution of aluminum chloride onto a surface; heating the liquid solution with a first radiant heat source in order to dry the aluminum chloride, so that solid aluminum chloride hexahydrate is formed; crushing the solid aluminum chloride hexahydrate in order to reduce an overall particle size of the aluminum chloride hexahydrate; and heating the aluminum chloride hexahydrate with a second radiate heat source in order to decompose the aluminum chloride hexahydrate to produce the particles of aluminum chlorohydrate.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein providing the liquid solution includes spraying the liquid solution onto a conveyor belt.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first radiant heat source and/or the second radiant heat source includes one or more burners provided above and/or below the surface.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the first radiant heat source and/or the second radiant heat source is provided about 5 inches to about 5.875 inches from the surface.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first radiant heat source and/or the second radiant heat source heats the surface.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first radiant heat source and the second radiant heat source are the same heat source.
7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: collecting gas emitted from the heated liquid solution and/or the heated aluminum chloride hexahydrate.
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the gas includes steam and/or hydrochloric acid released from the heated solution and/or the heated aluminum chloride hexahydrate.
9. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: collecting heat emitted from the heated solution and/or the heated aluminum chloride hexahydrate in order to recover the heat.
10. A system for producing particles of aluminum chlorohydrate, the system comprising: a feed stream configured to have a liquid solution of aluminum chloride; a conveyor belt having a surface configured to hold the liquid solution; a first radiant heat source configured to heat the liquid solution on the surface in order to form solid aluminum chloride hexahydrate; a grinder configured to crush the solid aluminum chloride hexahydrate in order to reduce an overall particle size of the aluminum chloride hexahydrate; and a second radiant heat source configured to heat the aluminum chloride hexahydrate in order to decompose the aluminum chloride hexahydrate and produce the particles of aluminum chlorohydrate.
11. The system according to claim 10, wherein the first radiant heat source and/or the second radiant heat source includes one or more burners provided above and/or below the surface.
12. The system according to claim 11, wherein the first radiant heat source and the second radiant heat source are the same heat source.
13. The system according to claim 10, further comprising: a gas collector configured to collect gas emitted from the heated liquid solution and/or the heated aluminum chloride hexahydrate.
14. The system according to claim 10, further comprising: a heat recouperator configured to collect heat emitted from the heated solution and/or the heated aluminum chloride hexahydrate in order to recover the heat.
15. The system according to claim 10, further comprising: a reflector configured to return radiant energy to the surface reflected from the heated solution and/or the heated aluminum chloride hexahydrate in order to utilize the radiant energy generated.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The foregoing features of embodiments will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS
(8) Systems and methods for improving and simplifying the process for producing aluminum chlorohydrate are described herein. The system and process reduces the construction capital and operating costs while simultaneously simplifying the operation when compared to prior art. In addition, the product produced appears to have improved properties as a coagulant in the water treatment market than the product produced by the current method.
(9)
(10) In the new process, shown in
(11)
(12) The energy required to operate this new system and process now comes from a radiant heat source 25 as opposed to the prior art method shown in
(13) In embodiments of the present invention, the heating process still performs two separate functions, (1) drying the liquid aluminum chloride to the solid aluminum chloride hexahydrate and (2) allowing the decomposition of the hexahydrate to form the aluminum chlorohydrate. In embodiments of the present invention, these two processes are separated, which has several benefits. The first benefit is allowing for the separation of water vapor produced in the drying step from the high concentration HCl produced in the decomposition step. Separating the two sources facilitates the production of high quality HCl (greater than 30% by weight) for recycle to another portion of a plant. Next, in the transformation from liquid to solid, nearly 50 percent of the mass leaves the system as a vapor. Decoupling the drying from the decomposition allows for the consolidation of the dried solids into a deeper bed in the decomposition unit, allowing the sizing of the unit to be reduced or optimized. Finally, the production of hexahydrate by the method in the first part of the process produces a flake-like product that is in an irregular sheet that can range to over 1 inch tall. One of the factors in the absorbance of energy from a radiant heat source 25 is the distance from the receiving object to the heat source 25. The irregular surface of the flakes causes enough variance in the energy transfer to cause significant localized chemistry deviations in the final product. Separating the two processes allows for the insertion of a crushing unit 40 to make a more uniform feed to the decomposition step, thus minimizing these deviations. The prior art process shown in
EXAMPLES
(14) Several tests to produce the particles of aluminum chlorohydrate were conducted. Samples were produced by placing a known weight of a known analysis aluminum chloride solution in a pan made of Hastelloy C-276. This pan was placed on a 5000-gram scale and exposed to radiant heat generated by a “Mr. Heater Portable Buddy 4,000/9,000 BTU” ceramic propane heater model MH9BX modified to operate in the horizontal position. The heater was equipped with a dual flow fuel valve that was nominally rated at high flow 9000 BTU per hour and low flow 4000 BTU per hour. The samples were mounted on adjustable rods so that the distance from the heating surface to the pan was adjustable.
(15) As energy was transferred to the liquid, the water evaporated causing the scale weight to decrease. Knowing the starting weight and composition of the aluminum chloride, the ending weight that produced aluminum chloride hexahydrate was calculated.
(16) As the aluminum chloride solution transitioned from a liquid to a solid, a layer of solid material formed on the surface of the liquid trapping the evaporating water. The steam trapped under the solid layer caused the solid layer to lift off the liquid surface. As the solid layer lifted, the layer stretched until it cracked and allowed the steam to vent sending the solid layer back down to the liquid surface. With each cycle of this, the thickness of the solid layer increased until the layer gained enough strength to support itself and not fall back into the liquid.
(17) In initial tests described in Examples 1 and 2 below, the final product formed a cloudy solution when added to water and was hard to dissolve into the water. By varying the distance from the heat source, the mode by which the heat source was applied and adding an intermediate grinding step, the final product produced in Example 6 was able to form a clear solution when dissolved into water. Table 1, shown below, provides the parameters used for the Examples and
Example 1
(18) Sample 1-100.1 grams AlCl.sub.3 heated full power non-stop to 19.7 grams with heat source 5.00 inches away. Hard to dissolve and made a cloudy solution.
Example 2
(19) Sample 2-100.1 grams AlCl.sub.3 heated full power non-stop to 18.6 grams with heat source 5.875 inches away. Product dissolves to a cloudy solution.
Example 3
(20) Sample 3-100.2 grams RO Water (without any AlCl.sub.3) heated full power until gone with heat source 5.875 inches away. Calculated heat absorbance 14.93 BTU/minute or 0.271 BTU/in.sup.2/minute. Sample 3 was tested in order to determine how much energy from the radiant heat source was being effectively absorbed by the sample compared to the system. No product was produced.
Example 5
(21) Sample 5-100.0 grams AlCl.sub.3 heated full power till dry with heat source 5.875 inches away. Removed from heat and crushed to make more uniform distance from heat source to product. Returned to heat and continued at high power to 17.9 grams with heat source 5.875 inches away. Product dissolves to a hazy solution.
Example 6
(22) Sample 6-100.5 grams AlCl.sub.3 heated full power till dry with heat source 5.875 inches away. Removed from heat and crushed to make more uniform distance from heat source to product. Returned to heat and continued at low power to 19.5 grams with heat source 5.875 inches away. Product dissolved to a clear solution.
(23) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Sample Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 5 6 S.G. Solution 1.27 1.27 1 1.27 1.27 Density 10.588 10.588 8.337 10.588 10.588 Film thickness 0.0873 0.0873 0.1110 0.0872 0.0877 Heat Distance 5.000 5.875 5.875 5.875 5.875 Lab Analysis % Al2O3 34.66% 50.30% 0.00% 49.35% 41.70% % (OH) 25.40% 33.46% 0.00% 31.83% 29.40% % Cl 33.23% 25.73% 0.00% 24.83% 27.96% Calculated Basicity (OH) Basicity 73.2% 66.5% 0.0% 64.4% 70.4% Cl Basicity 54.0% 75.5% 0.0% 75.9% 67.9%
(24) Although the Examples disclose specific parameters used, embodiments of the present invention may use various parameters in order to modify the final product. For example, for the hexahydrate production, temperature of the heating surface of the radiant source, distance from the radiant source to the product, and/or depth of the aluminum chloride solution so that unwanted by products are not formed on the surface of the hexahydrate facing the radiant source before all the water is evaporated may be varied. Similarly, for the hexahydrate decomposition, temperature of the heating surface of the radiant source, distance from the radiant source to the product, particle size for decomposition, and/or depth of the hexahydrate so that unwanted by products are not formed on the surface of the hexahydrate facing the radiant source before the desired decomposition is complete may be varied. In addition, the relationship between weight loss, percent basic and waters of hydration in the product verses radiant heat source temperature and distance from product may also be varied along with variances in reflected temperature, the extent of reaction, and the power needed.
(25)
(26) One embodiment of a two-stage pilot plant gas fired radiant dryer that heats a thin layer of liquid feedstock uniformly applied to a continuous moving belt, thereby converting it to a dry powdered product, is shown in
(27) This may be accomplished in two distinct and separate dryer stages. In stage 1 all free water is evaporated forming a dry crust of material using high intensity radiant heating. The crust may be easily broken and fed though a “crusher” before entering the stage 2 section of the dryer. In stage 2 the crushed material may be applied in a fairly uniform layer on the belt where lower intensity infrared heating converts it to the desired finished product.
(28) The capacity of the system may be 5 lb./hr. of finished product at the discharge of stage 2.
(29) Working examples indicate the conversion of feedstock to product is a yield of about 19.4%, so this may require a first stage feed rate of 25.8 lb./hr. Approximately 48% of the feed liquid may evaporate in the first stage, so the second stage feed rate may be about 13.4 lb./hr.
(30) The liquid feed is a clear free flowing liquid containing soluble salts, preferably having a density=10.6 lb./gal and a low viscosity similar to water.
(31) The final product is a powdered solid, having a density=18-20 lb./cf.
(32) Discharge from first stage is a solid having no free water so that it can be crushed prior to second stage.
(33) Working examples indicate the bed in the first stage is typically about 230-250 F when exposed to high intensity radiant heat for about 15 minutes while the free water evaporates from the thin film of material. The initial thickness of the liquid layer of feed in these studies was approximately 0.09″. The material bed in the second stage is at a higher temperature of about 350-450 F and is exposed to lower intensity radiant heat for about 35 minutes during the decomposition step.
(34) Control of off gases and dust require the dryers to have enclosed hoods which may be connected to existing plant system. The hoods may be provided with adjustable dampers and manometers for controlling the hood vacuum. Off gas from the first stage is primarily water vapor containing some HCl; off gases from the second stage is primarily HCl. The gases may be vented to existing collection system(s) under a controlled low vacuum, e.g., on the order of a couple of inches of water, to prevent emissions of vapor and dust into the workspace. As long as the HCl remains in the vapor state, stainless steel may be used as an acceptable material of construction.
(35) This drying system may be used to perform experiments in order to determine design of a future full-size plant system, therefore the systems key process variables must be capable of being changed and measured, such as: Feed rate, Belt speed, Radiant heater temperatures, Distance between radiant element and the belt, and Hood draft.
(36) In addition, other variables may need to be monitored, such as Feed temperature, Fuel gas consumption, Material temperature while drying, Off gas temperatures near the inlet and exit of each bed.
(37) Other desirable features of the dryer may be:
(38) The materials of construction must resist HCl corrosion and withstand high temperatures. Preferably, multiple sight ports along each dryer, multiple emergency stop push button, and high temperature shutdown may be included.
(39) Although the above discussion discloses various exemplary embodiments, those skilled in the art may make various modifications to, or variations of, the illustrated embodiments without departing from the inventive concepts disclosed herein.