Systems for and methods of conditioning loosefill insulation material
11035134 · 2021-06-15
Assignee
Inventors
- James Justin Evans (Granville, OH)
- Michael Eugene Evans (Granville, OH, US)
- Timothy H. Newell (Nephi, UT, US)
- Apollo Hannon (Mt. Pleasant, UT, US)
Cpc classification
E04F21/085
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
B02C23/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B02C23/40
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B02C23/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B02C23/40
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A machine for distributing unbonded loosefill insulation material through a hose connected thereto is disclosed. The machine includes a fluidizer having one or more air knives for conditioning the loosefill material as it is being applied.
Claims
1. A system for conditioning loosefill material during application thereof, the system comprising: a machine for distributing loosefill material, the machine comprising: a chute configured to receive and direct the loosefill material in a machine direction; a shredder configured to shred and pick apart the loosefill material; and a blower for distributing the loosefill material into an airstream; a hose connected to the machine for conveying the loosefill material in the airstream; and a fluidizer for receiving the loosefill material in the airstream and conditioning the loosefill material to decrease its average density, wherein the fluidizer includes a first air knife that generates a first shaped stream of air that impinges on the loosefill material within the fluidizer; wherein the fluidizer includes a second air knife that generates a second shaped stream of air that impinges on the loosefill material within the fluidizer; and wherein the first shaped stream of air and the second shaped stream of air flow parallel to one another within the fluidizer.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the fluidizer is positioned between the machine and the hose.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the hose includes an input end and an output end; wherein the loosefill material enters the hose at the input end; wherein the loosefill material exits the hose at the output end; and wherein the fluidizer is positioned at the output end of the hose.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the hose includes an input end and an output end; wherein the loosefill material enters the hose at the input end; wherein the loosefill material exits the hose at the output end; wherein the fluidizer comprises a first fluidizer and a second fluidizer; wherein the first fluidizer is positioned at the input end of the hose; and wherein the second fluidizer is positioned at the output end of the hose.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the hose includes an input end and an output end; wherein the loosefill material enters the hose at the input end; wherein the loosefill material exits the hose at the output end; and wherein the fluidizer is positioned closer to the output end of the hose than the input end of the hose.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the hose includes an input end and an output end; wherein the loosefill material enters the hose at the input end; wherein the loosefill material exits the hose at the output end; and wherein the fluidizer is positioned closer to the input end of the hose than the output end of the hose.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the hose includes an input end and an output end; wherein the loosefill material enters the hose at the input end; wherein the loosefill material exits the hose at the output end; and wherein the fluidizer is positioned so as to at least partially overlap with a portion of the hose equidistant from the input end of the hose and the output end of the hose.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein the hose includes a plurality of discrete segments; and wherein the fluidizer is positioned between two adjacent segments.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein an inner surface of the hose is smooth.
10. The system of claim 1, wherein an inner surface of the hose is corrugated.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first air knife and the second air knife operates at a pressure within the range of 1 psi to 5 psi.
12. The system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first air knife and the second air knife operates at a pressure within the range of 40 psi to 120 psi.
13. The system of claim 1, wherein the fluidizer includes three or more air knives.
14. A system for conditioning loosefill material during application thereof, the system comprising: a machine for distributing loosefill material, the machine comprising: a chute configured to receive and direct the loosefill material in a machine direction; a shredder configured to shred and pick apart the loosefill material; and a blower for distributing the loosefill material into an airstream; a hose connected to the machine for conveying the loosefill material in the airstream; and a fluidizer for receiving the loosefill material in the airstream and conditioning the loosefill material to decrease its average density, wherein the fluidizer includes a first air knife that generates a first shaped stream of air that impinges on the loosefill material within the fluidizer; wherein the fluidizer includes a second air knife that generates a second shaped stream of air that impinges on the loosefill material within the fluidizer; and wherein the first shaped stream of air and the second shaped stream of air intersect with one another within the fluidizer.
15. The system of claim 14, wherein the fluidizer is positioned between the machine and the hose.
16. The system of claim 14, wherein the hose includes an input end and an output end; wherein the loosefill material enters the hose at the input end; wherein the loosefill material exits the hose at the output end; and wherein the fluidizer is positioned at the output end of the hose.
17. The system of claim 14, wherein the hose includes an input end and an output end; wherein the loosefill material enters the hose at the input end; wherein the loosefill material exits the hose at the output end; wherein the fluidizer comprises a first fluidizer and a second fluidizer; wherein the first fluidizer is positioned at the input end of the hose; and wherein the second fluidizer is positioned at the output end of the hose.
18. The system of claim 14, wherein the hose includes an input end and an output end; wherein the loosefill material enters the hose at the input end; wherein the loosefill material exits the hose at the output end; and wherein the fluidizer is positioned closer to the output end of the hose than the input end of the hose.
19. The system of claim 14, wherein the hose includes an input end and an output end; wherein the loosefill material enters the hose at the input end; wherein the loosefill material exits the hose at the output end; and wherein the fluidizer is positioned closer to the input end of the hose than the output end of the hose.
20. The system of claim 14, wherein the hose includes an input end and an output end; wherein the loosefill material enters the hose at the input end; wherein the loosefill material exits the hose at the output end; and wherein the fluidizer is positioned so as to at least partially overlap with a portion of the hose equidistant from the input end of the hose and the output end of the hose.
21. The system of claim 14, wherein the hose includes a plurality of discrete segments; and wherein the fluidizer is positioned between two adjacent segments.
22. The system of claim 14, wherein an inner surface of the hose is smooth.
23. The system of claim 14, wherein an inner surface of the hose is corrugated.
24. The system of claim 14, wherein at least one of the first air knife and the second air knife operates at a pressure within the range of 1 psi to 5 psi.
25. The system of claim 14, wherein at least one of the first air knife and the second air knife operates at a pressure within the range of 40 psi to 120 psi.
26. The system of claim 14, wherein the fluidizer includes three or more air knives.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(8) The general inventive concepts encompass the use of air knives for further conditioning loosefill insulation during application thereof. An “air knife” is a stream of pressurized air (or other gas) that is directed so as to impinge upon a material and alter its profile (e.g., shape, size). Various exemplary embodiments of air knives are described below, both alone in and in the context of an exemplary loosefill blowing machine.
(9) In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the description and figures disclose unbonded loosefill insulation systems. The unbonded loosefill insulation systems include a loosefill blowing machine and an associated unbonded loosefill insulation material. Generally, the operating parameters of the loosefill blowing machine are tuned to the insulative characteristics of the associated unbonded loosefill insulation material such that the resulting blown unbonded loosefill insulation material provides improved insulative values. The term “loosefill blowing machine,” as used herein, is defined to mean any structure, device or mechanism configured to condition and deliver insulation material into an airstream. The term “loosefill insulation material,” as used herein, is defined to any conditioned insulation materials configured for distribution in an airstream. The term “unbonded,” as used herein, is defined to mean the absence of a binder. The term “finely conditioned,” as used herein, is defined to mean the shredding of unbonded loosefill insulation material to a desired density prior to distribution into an airstream.
(10) One example of a loosefill blowing machine, configured for distributing compressed unbonded loosefill insulation material (hereafter “loosefill material”), is shown at 10 in
(11) The chute 14 is configured to receive loosefill material and introduce the loosefill material to a shredding chamber 23 as shown in
(12) As further shown in
(13) As shown in
(14) Referring again to
(15) In the embodiment illustrated in
(16) Referring again to
(17) The shredders 24a and 24b, agitator 26, discharge mechanism 28, and the blower 36 are mounted for rotation and driven by a motor 34. The mechanisms and systems for driving the shredders 24a and 24b, agitator 26, discharge mechanism 28, and the blower 36 will discussed in more detail below.
(18) In operation, the chute 14 guides the loosefill material to the shredding chamber 23. The shredding chamber 23 includes the low speed shredders 24a and 24b configured to shred and pick apart the loosefill material. The shredded loosefill material drops from the low speed shredders 24a and 24b into the agitator 26. The agitator 26 finely conditions the loosefill material for distribution into the airstream 33 by further shredding the loosefill material. The finely conditioned loosefill material exits the agitator 26 and enters the discharge mechanism 28 for distribution into the airstream 33 caused by the blower 36. The airstream 33, with the finely conditioned loosefill material, exits the machine 10 at a machine outlet 32 and flows through a distribution hose 46, as shown in
(19) Referring again to
(20) Referring again to
(21) Referring again to
(22) As shown in
(23) Referring again to
(24) The first drive system includes a plurality of drive sprockets, idler sprockets, tension mechanisms, and a drive chain (for purposes of clarity, none of these components are shown). The first drive system components are rotated by the motor 34, which, in turn, causes rotation of the agitator.
(25) Referring again to
(26) In the embodiment illustrated in
(27) In the illustrated embodiment, the motor 34 driving the first and second drive systems is configured to operate on a single 15 ampere, 110 volt a.c. power supply. In other embodiments, other power supplies can be used.
(28) Referring again to
(29) Referring again to
(30) Referring again to
(31) While the embodiment of the loosefill blowing machine 10 has been described above as having various components operating at certain fixed rotational speeds, it should be appreciated that in other embodiments, the fixed rotational speeds can be at other rotational levels.
(32) Notwithstanding the above-described exemplary embodiments, the general inventive concepts encompass other types and configurations of loosefill blowing machines. By way of example, the general inventive concepts could be applied to the loosefill blowing machines described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,971,813; 7,520,459; 7,712,690; 7,731,115; 7,819,349; and 7,938,348, the entire disclosure of each being incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
(33) With operation of one exemplary loosefill blowing machine 10 having been described, attention will now be turned to the improved means for conditioning the loosefill material outside of the machine or otherwise as it is being applied.
(34) In particular, a system 400 for distributing compressed unbonded loosefill insulation material, according to one exemplary embodiment, is shown in
(35) The hose 406 includes an input end 408 and an output end 410, with a midline 412 of the hose 406 being equidistant from the ends 408, 410. The input end 408 of the hose 406 is connected to the outlet 404 of the machine 402. The loosefill material 420 exists the hose 406 at the output end 410 such that it is generally traveling in a direction in which the output end 410 is pointing, as indicated by arrow 414.
(36) The hose 406 is typically flexible to facilitate routing of the hose 406 to the desired location and manipulation of the hose 406 during delivery of the loosefill material 420. The hose 406 can be of any suitable length. In some exemplary embodiments, the hose 406 has a length between 100 feet and 300 feet. In some exemplary embodiments, the hose 406 has a length between 125 feet and 175 feet. In some exemplary embodiments, the hose 406 has a length of 150 feet. In some exemplary embodiments, the hose 406 has a length between 225 feet and 275 feet. In some exemplary embodiments, the hose 406 has a length of 250 feet. The hose 406 can be of any suitable diameter. In some exemplary embodiments, the hose 406 has a diameter between 2 inches and 6 inches. In some exemplary embodiments, the hose 406 has a diameter of 3 inches. In some exemplary embodiments, the hose 406 has a diameter of 4 inches. In some exemplary embodiments, the hose 406 has a diameter of 5 inches. The hose 406 can have a smooth inner surface or a non-smooth (e.g., corrugated) inner surface.
(37) Given the need to better condition the loosefill material 420 as it is being applied (i.e., as it exits the output end 410 of the hose 406), it was discovered that, under certain conditions, the use of one or more air knives was able to provide superior results compared to various conventional approaches. For example, as shown in Tables 1-4 below, various approaches to conditioning loosefill material outside of the machine, under the same general conditions, were assessed. In some of these tests, an additional device (i.e., fluidizer type), separate from the hose itself, was used. For example, in Test #2, a spiked conduit, approximating such a device as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,648,022 (see
(38) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Meter Contact Test Area Excess Box Hose Fluidizer Thickness Thickness Mass Mass Mass Test # Type Type (inches) (inches) (grams) (grams) (grams) 1/Control Non- None 6.50 6.18 82.32 360 442.14 smooth 6.82 6.48 86.45 372 458.70 2 Non- Spiked 6.82 6.48 82.13 351 433.40 smooth 6.66 6.33 79.81 343 423.26 3 Non- HP Air 6.80 6.46 78.3 343 421.03 smooth Knife 6.82 6.48 81.45 350 431.12 4 Non- LP Air 6.72 6.38 83.26 373 456.07 smooth Knife 6.75 6.41 81.69 365 446.30 5 Smooth LP Air 6.87 6.53 83.1 367 450.31 Knife 6.84 6.50 80.2 358 438.41 6 Smooth HP Air 6.99 6.64 79.04 343 421.87 Knife 6.77 6.43 78.11 334 411.85 7 Smooth None 7.00 6.65 89.51 386 475.26 7.00 6.65 87.27 391 478.53
(39) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Box % Box Box Density Density Hose Fluidizer Mass Density Average vs. Test # Type Type (lbs) (pcf) (pcf) Control 1/Control Non- None 0.97 0.539 0.536 — smooth 1.01 0.533 2 Non- Spiked 0.96 0.503 0.503 −6% smooth 0.93 0.503 3 Non- HP Air 0.93 0.490 0.496 −8% smooth Knife 0.95 0.501 4 Non- LP Air 1.01 0.538 0.531 −1% smooth Knife 0.98 0.524 5 Smooth LP Air 0.99 0.519 0.513 −4% Knife 0.97 0.508 6 Smooth HP Air 0.93 0.478 0.480 −10% Knife 0.91 0.482 7 Smooth None 1.05 0.538 0.540 1% 1.05 0.542
(40) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Average Meter Meter Meter k-value k-Dev k-Dev Hose Fluidizer Density (BTU .Math. in/ (BTU .Math. in/ (BTU .Math. in/ Test # Type Type (pcf) hr .Math. ft.sup.2 .Math. ° F.) hr .Math. ft.sup.2 .Math. ° F.) hr .Math. ft.sup.2 .Math. ° F.) 1/Control Non- None 0.508 0.3543 0.012 0.008 smooth 0.508 0.3473 0.005 2 Non- Spiked 0.483 0.3565 0.007 0.004 smooth 0.481 0.3516 0.001 3 Non- HP Air 0.462 0.3532 (0.004) (0.003) smooth Knife 0.479 0.3484 (0.003) 4 Non- LP Air 0.497 0.3468 0.001 0.000 smooth Knife 0.485 0.3488 (0.000) 5 Smooth LP Air 0.485 0.3486 (0.001) 0.000 Knife 0.470 0.3548 0.001 6 Smooth HP Air 0.453 0.3586 (0.001) (0.001) Knife 0.463 0.3567 0.000 7 Smooth None 0.513 0.3478 0.007 0.009 0.500 0.3563 0.012
(41) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Performance Improvement Test # Hose Type Fluidizer Type (k-Dev) vs. Control 1/Control Non-smooth None — 2 Non-smooth Spiked (0.005) 3 Non-smooth HP Air Knife (0.012) 4 Non-smooth LP Air Knife (0.008) 5 Smooth LP Air Knife (0.008) 6 Smooth HP Air Knife (0.009) 7 Smooth None 0.001
(42) The testing was conducted in accordance with ASTM C 687, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
(43) Per ASTM C 687, a thermal test specimen frame with dimensions 24″×24″×6″ tall is installed with loosefill insulation. The top of the insulation is leveled (Contact Thickness) per ASTM C 739. The Test Thickness is calculated from Equation 1.
Test Thickness=Contact Thickness×0.95 (1)
(44) After the material-filled thermal test specimen is tested via ASTM C 518 (thermal tester), the 10″×10″ test area (meter) density of the insulation is calculated via Equation 2.
(45)
(46) Where:
(47) D.sub.m=test (meter) density of insulation (pet);
(48) M.sub.m=mass of material contained in the meter area frame (lbs);
(49) A.sub.m=Area of the metering area frame (ft.sup.2); and
(50) L=Test thickness (ft).
(51) The density of the entire thermal box (box density) is calculated via Equation 3.
(52)
(53) Where:
(54) D.sub.B=box density of insulation (pcf);
(55) M.sub.B=mass of material contained in the thermal test specimen frame (lbs);
(56) A.sub.B=Area of the thermal test specimen frame (ft.sup.2); and
(57) L=Test thickness (ft).
(58) During the fluidizing trials a control was established by running the manufacturing line at standard line operating and standard loosefill blowing machine configurations. Relative density performance of the trial (fluidizing) material vs. control is calculated by Equation 4.
(59)
(60) Where:
(61) D.sub.l=Density vs. control; note that a negative value translates to lighter density (pcf);
(62) D.sub.t=Box density of trial material (pcf); and
(63) D.sub.e=Box density of control material (pcf).
(64) As shown in
(65) The testing was carried out using standard attic loosefill insulation, as produced and sold by Owens Corning. The thermal performance of the loosefill insulation is characterized by Equation 5.
k=0.1959+0.0744/meter density (5)
(66) Where:
(67) k=thermal conductivity (Btu.Math.in/hr.Math.ft.sup.2.Math.° F.).
(68) The thermal performance of the trial material relative to k is referred to as “meter k-deviation” and is calculated via Equation 6.
k-deviation=k.sub.t−k (6)
(69) Where:
(70) k-deviation=thermal conductivity relative to k (Btu.Math.in/hr.Math.ft.sup.2.Math.° F.); and
(71) k.sub.t=thermal conductivity of trial material (Btu.Math.in/hr.Math.ft.sup.2.Math.° F.).
(72) During the fluidizing trials, a control was established by running the manufacturing line at standard line operating and standard loosefill blowing machine configurations. Relative thermal performance of the trial (fluidizing) material vs. control is calculated by Equation 7.
kdev.sub.l=kdev.sub.t−kdev.sub.c (7)
(73) Where:
(74) kdev.sub.l=k-deviation of trial material vs. k-deviation of control material, note that a negative value translates to improved thermal performance (Btu.Math.in/hr.Math.ft.sup.2.Math.° F.);
(75) kdev.sub.t=k-deviation of trial material (Btu.Math.in/hr.Math.ft.sup.2.Math.° F.); and
(76) kdev.sub.c=k-deviation of control material (Btu.Math.in/hr.Math.ft.sup.2.Math.° F.).
(77) In Test #1, which is considered the control, a non-smooth hose (i.e., a corrugated hose) having projections or the like extending a predetermined depth from an outer surface of the hose into an inner cavity of the hose was used. The same type and length (i.e., 150 feet) of non-smooth hose was used for Test #2, Test #3, and Test #4. Conversely, in Test #5, Test #6, and Test #7, a smooth hose of approximately the same length (i.e., 150 feet) was used. The smooth hose had the same diameter (i.e., 4 inches) of the non-smooth hose, but lacked any internal projections instead having a uniform inner surface.
(78) In all of the tests (i.e., Test #1, Test #2, Test #3, Test #4, Test #5, Test #6, and Test #7), the loosefill blowing machine was calibrated to have an end-of-hose pressure of approximately 1.8 psi. In those tests employing a fluidizer (i.e., Test #2, Test #3, Test #4, Test #5, and Test #6), an additional length (i.e., 5 feet) of the non-smooth hose was attached to the fluidizer to facilitate placement of the loosefill material exiting the fluidizer.
(79) In Test #1, no fluidizer device was used. Accordingly, the conditioning of the loosefill material was limited to any conditioning performed within the loosefill blowing machine and any conditioning performed by the corrugated hose. As noted above, Test #1 is considered the control for comparison purposes.
(80) In Test #2, a fluidizer device was used. The fluidizer device was formed from a tube having a length of 16 inches, a diameter of 4 inches, and a circumference of approximately 12 inches. Along the length of the tube, 7 rows of holes were formed. The rows were evenly spaced from one another. Each row included 6 holes distributed around the circumference of the tube and spaced approximately 2 inches from one another. The holes in each row were offset from the holes in adjacent rows. In this manner, a total of 42 holes were formed in the tube. Thereafter, a metal screw was inserted into each hole such that a portion (i.e., having a length of approximately ½ inch) of the screws extended into the inner cavity of the tube. Accordingly, the fluidizer device further conditioned the loosefill material beyond the conditioning performed by the loosefill blowing machine and the corrugated hose.
(81) In Test #3, a fluidizer device was used. The fluidizer device included a cylindrical housing with an input port and an output port. The housing had a diameter of 6 inches and a length of 6 feet. The input port was connected to the output end of the 150-foot long non-smooth hose. The output port was connected to the input end of the 5-foot long non-smooth hose. Because the hoses had a diameter of 4 inches and the cylindrical housing had a diameter of 6 inches, appropriately shaped and sized couplers were positioned at the input port and the output port to provide a step down diameter of 4 inches, thereby facilitating the interface of the fluidizer device with the hoses. In this manner, the housing defined a space through which the loosefill material traveled prior to reaching its final destination. The housing included two apertures formed therein. Each aperture was used to interface with a high-pressure (i.e., 80 psi) air knife. Each air knife was connected to a source of compressed air. The air knives shaped the compressed air to form a pair of uniform sheets of high-velocity air. Since each air knife was positioned so that its laminar airflow would pass through the corresponding aperture in the housing and into the space therein, the air knives further conditioned the loosefill material flowing through the fluidizer device, beyond the conditioning performed by the loosefill blowing machine and the corrugated hose.
(82) In Test #4, a fluidizer device was used. The fluidizer device included a box-like housing with an input port and an output port. The housing had dimensions of 12 inches×12 inches×48 inches. The input port was connected to the output end of the 150-foot long non-smooth hose. The output port was connected to the input end of the 5-foot long non-smooth hose. In this manner, the housing defined a space through which the loosefill material traveled prior to reaching its final destination. The housing included two apertures formed therein. Each aperture was used to interface with a low-pressure (i.e., 2.5 psi) air knife. Each air knife was connected to a source of compressed air. The air knives shaped the compressed air to form a pair of uniform sheets of high-velocity air. Since each air knife was positioned so that its laminar airflow would pass through the corresponding aperture in the housing and into the space therein, the air knives further conditioned the loosefill material flowing through the fluidizer device, beyond the conditioning performed by the loosefill blowing machine and the corrugated hose.
(83) In Test #5, a fluidizer device was used. The fluidizer device included a box-like housing with an input port and an output port. The housing had dimensions of 12 inches×12 inches×48 inches. The input port was connected to the output end of the 150-foot long smooth hose. The output port was connected to the input end of the 5-foot long non-smooth hose. In this manner, the housing defined a space through which the loosefill material traveled prior to reaching its final destination. The housing included two apertures formed therein. Each aperture was used to interface with a low-pressure (i.e., 2.5 psi) air knife. Each air knife was connected to a source of compressed air. The air knives shaped the compressed air to form a pair of uniform sheets of high-velocity air. Since each air knife was positioned so that its laminar airflow would pass through the corresponding aperture in the housing and into the space therein, the air knives further conditioned the loosefill material flowing through the fluidizer device, beyond the conditioning performed by the loosefill blowing machine and the smooth hose.
(84) In Test #6, a fluidizer device was used. The fluidizer device included a cylindrical housing with an input port and an output port. The housing had a diameter of 6 inches and a length of 6 feet. The input port was connected to the output end of the 150-foot long smooth hose. The output port was connected to the input end of the 5-foot long non-smooth hose. In this manner, the housing defined a space through which the loosefill material traveled prior to reaching its final destination. The housing included two apertures formed therein. Each aperture was used to interface with a high-pressure (i.e., 80 psi) air knife. Each air knife was connected to a source of compressed air. The air knives shaped the compressed air to form a pair of uniform sheets of high-velocity air. Since each air knife was positioned so that its laminar airflow would pass through the corresponding aperture in the housing and into the space therein, the air knives further conditioned the loosefill material flowing through the fluidizer device, beyond the conditioning performed by the loosefill blowing machine and the smooth hose.
(85) In Test #7, no fluidizer device was used. Furthermore, the smooth (i.e., non-corrugated) hose was used to convey the loosefill material to its intended destination. Accordingly, the conditioning of the loosefill material was limited to any conditioning performed within the loosefill blowing machine and the smooth hose.
(86) The results of these tests provided information which is summarized in Tables 1-4. As can be seen in these tables (particularly Tables 3-4), Test #3, Test #4, Test #5, and Test #6 establish the viability of using air knives to further condition loosefill material, beyond any conditioning that may occur in the loosefill blowing machine and/or the hose attached thereto. In particular, a Meter k-Dev value less than 1/Control (i.e., Test #1) indicates reduced thermal conductivity and, thus, a performance improvement. Consequently, the general inventive concepts allow for achieving a desired thermal performance without requiring application of additional (i.e., excess) loosefill material or otherwise mitigating against the need for such excess loosefill material.
(87) Returning to
(88) In some exemplary embodiments, the air knife 450 is positioned at the input end 408 of the hose 406 (i.e., between the outlet 404 of the loosefill blowing machine 402 and the hose 406). In some exemplary embodiments, the air knife 450 is positioned at the output end 410 of the hose 406. In these latter embodiments, a supplemental hose (not shown) could be used with the air knife 450 to facilitate delivery of the loosefill material after conditioning by the air knife 450.
(89) In some exemplary embodiments, the air knife 450 is positioned between the output end 410 of the hose 406 and the midline 412 of the hose 406 (see
(90) In some exemplary embodiments, the air knife 450 is positioned between the input end 408 of the hose 406 and the midline 412 of the hose 406 (see
(91) In some exemplary embodiments, the air knife 450 is positioned such that at least a portion of the air knife 450 overlaps with the midline 412 of the hose 406 (see
(92) In some exemplary embodiments, multiple air knives 450 can be used with the system 400 (see
(93) A benefit of the improved conditioning of the loosefill material is better thermal performance. For example, given the standard configuration used in Test #1 (control), the loosefill blowing machine had a blow rate of approximately 17 lbs./min. A 1,000 square-foot attic insulated to an R30 level requires approximately 416 lbs. of a given loosefill material, which takes approximately 24.5 minutes to install. By using the fluidizer device from Test #3 (i.e., including a pair of high-pressure air knives), the blow rate remains constant but the improved conditioning (e.g., lighter density) imparted by the fluidizer device results in only approximately 390 lbs. of the given loosefill material being needed, which takes less than 23 minutes to install.
(94) Thus, another benefit from the improved conditioning of the loosefill material is faster installation times (i.e., cubic feet/minute). For example, given the standard configuration used in Test #1 (control), the loosefill blowing machine was able to deliver approximately 470 cfm of loosefill material. Use of a fluidizer device, such as those disclosed herein, including at least one air knife resulted in the loosefill blowing machine being able to deliver from 40 to 280 additional cfm of the loosefill material.
(95) A fluidizer device 500, according to an exemplary embodiment, is shown in
(96) Opposite ends of the cylindrical housing 502 are open to define an input opening 506 and an output opening 508, respectively. A pair of apertures 510 are formed in the cylindrical housing 502, each aperture 510 being sized and shaped to interface with a corresponding air knife 520 (see
(97) In operation, loosefill material output from a loosefill blowing machine (e.g., the loosefill blowing machine 402) and possibly traveling through a hose (e.g., the hose 406) enters the cylindrical housing 502 through the input opening 506, as represented by arrow 530.
(98) As the loosefill material passes through the interior cavity 504 of the cylindrical housing 502, it is impinged upon by the air knives 520. The air knives 520 are connected to a source of compressed air or other pressurized gas (not shown). The air knives 520 shape the compressed air, typically into laminar sheets of high-velocity air, which are then fed through the apertures 510 in the cylindrical housing 502, as represented by arrows 532.
(99) Although the sheets of air are adjacent and parallel to one another in this exemplary embodiment, the general inventive concepts contemplate other arrangements of the air knives 520 and corresponding apertures 510, such that the sheets of air could assume other spatial positions relative to one another.
(100) In some exemplary embodiments, the air knives 520 operate at a relatively low pressure in the range of 1 psi to 5 psi. In some exemplary embodiments, the air knives 520 operate at a pressure of 2.5 psi. In some exemplary embodiments, the air knives 520 operate at a relatively high pressure in the range of 40 psi to 120 psi. In some exemplary embodiments, the air knives 520 operate at a pressure of 80 psi.
(101) As the amplified air from the air knives 520 interacts with the loosefill material within the interior cavity 504, the loosefill material is further conditioned before exiting the cylindrical housing 502 through the output opening 508, as represented by arrow 534.
(102) A fluidizer device 600, according to an exemplary embodiment, is shown in
(103) The box-like housing 602 includes a pair of openings that define an input opening 606 and an output opening 608, respectively. A pair of apertures 610 are formed in the box-like housing 602, each aperture 610 being sized and shaped to interface with a corresponding air knife 620 (see
(104) In operation, loosefill material output from a loosefill blowing machine (e.g., the loosefill blowing machine 402) and possibly traveling through a hose (e.g., the hose 406) enters the box-like housing 602 through the input opening 606, as represented by arrow 630.
(105) As the loosefill material passes through the interior cavity 604 of the box-like housing 602, it is impinged upon by the air knives 620. The air knives 620 are connected to a source of compressed air or other pressurized gas (not shown). The air knives 620 shape the compressed air, typically into laminar sheets of high-velocity air, which are then fed through the apertures 610 in the box-like housing 602, as represented by arrows 632.
(106) Although the sheets of air are adjacent and perpendicular to one another in this exemplary embodiment, the general inventive concepts contemplate other arrangements of the air knives 620 and corresponding apertures 610, such that the sheets of air could assume other spatial positions relative to one another. A few such exemplary alternative arrangements are shown in
(107) In some exemplary embodiments, the air knives 620 operate at a relatively low pressure in the range of 1 psi to 5 psi. In some exemplary embodiments, the air knives 620 operate at a pressure of 2.5 psi. In some exemplary embodiments, the air knives 620 operate at a relatively high pressure in the range of 40 psi to 120 psi. In some exemplary embodiments, the air knives 620 operate at a pressure of 80 psi.
(108) As the amplified air from the air knives 620 interacts with the loosefill material within the interior cavity 604, the loosefill material is further conditioned before exiting the box-like housing 602 through the output opening 608, as represented by arrow 634.
(109) The above description of specific embodiments has been given by way of example. From the disclosure given, those skilled in the art will not only understand the general inventive concepts and their attendant advantages, but will also find apparent various changes and modifications to the structures and concepts disclosed. For example, although the disclosed embodiments are shown and described as using a pair of air knives, the general inventive concepts contemplate that more or fewer air knives could be used in different embodiments. It is sought, therefore, to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the general inventive concepts, as defined herein, and by any currently presented or future presented claims, and equivalents thereof.