Systems and methods for fabrication of superconducting integrated circuits
Licensing management
D-Wave10991755 · 2021-04-27
Assignee
Inventors
- Eric Ladizinsky (Manhattan Beach, CA, US)
- Geordie Rose (Vancouver, CA)
- Jeremy P. Hilton (Vancouver, CA)
- Eugene Dantsker (San Diego, CA, US)
- Byong Hyop Oh (San Jose, CA, US)
Cpc classification
Y10S977/943
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
G06N10/00
PHYSICS
H10N60/0156
ELECTRICITY
B82Y10/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y10S977/723
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
H10N69/00
ELECTRICITY
Y10S977/707
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
B82Y10/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
G06N10/00
PHYSICS
Abstract
Various techniques and apparatus permit fabrication of superconductive circuits and structures, for instance Josephson junctions, which may, for example be useful in quantum computers. For instance, a low magnetic flux noise trilayer structure may be fabricated having a dielectric structure or layer interposed between two elements or layers capable of superconducting. A superconducting via may directly overlie a Josephson junction. A structure, for instance a Josephson junction, may be carried on a planarized dielectric layer. A fin may be employed to remove heat from the structure. A via capable of superconducting may have a width that is less than about 1 micrometer. The structure may be coupled to a resistor, for example by vias and/or a strap connector.
Claims
1. A quantum computer comprising an integrated circuit, the integrated circuit comprising: a substrate; a quantum device comprising a loop of superconducting material interrupted by a Josephson junction, the Josephson junction comprising a Josephson junction trilayer overlying the substrate; a superconducting wiring layer overlying the Josephson junction trilayer, the superconducting wiring layer which comprises material that is superconductive at or below a critical temperature; a passivating layer overlying the superconducting wiring layer; and a cap overlying the Josephson junction trilayer.
2. The quantum computer of claim 1, wherein the passivating layer comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of silicon nitride (SiN) or titanium nitride (TiN).
3. The quantum computer of claim 1, wherein the substrate comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of silicon and sapphire.
4. The quantum computer of claim 1, wherein the Josephson junction trilayer comprises at least two layers of a metal that is superconductive at or below a critical temperature, the at least two layers interrupted by an insulating layer.
5. The quantum computer of claim 4, wherein the at least two layers of a metal that is superconductive at or below a critical temperature comprise niobium, and the insulating layer comprises aluminum oxide.
6. The quantum computer of claim 1, wherein the superconducting wiring layer comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of niobium, aluminum, lead, zinc, and tin.
7. A method of manufacture of a quantum computer, the method comprising fabricating an integrated circuit, the fabricating of the integrated circuit comprising: forming a quantum device, the quantum device comprising a loop of superconducting material interrupted by a Josephson junction, the forming of the quantum device comprising depositing a Josephson junction trilayer to overlie a substrate; depositing a superconducting wiring layer to overlie the Josephson junction trilayer; depositing a passivating layer in-situ atop the superconducting wiring layer; and depositing a cap to overlie the Josephson junction trilayer.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein depositing a passivating layer to overlie the superconducting wiring layer includes depositing at least one material selected from the group consisting of silicon nitride (SiN) or titanium nitride (TiN).
9. The method of claim 7 wherein depositing a passivating layer to overlie the superconducting wiring layer includes depositing a passivating layer before exposing the superconducting wiring layer to oxygen.
10. The method of claim 7 wherein depositing a cap to overlie the Josephson junction trilayer includes depositing a dielectric material to overlie the Josephson junction trilayer.
11. The method of claim 7 wherein depositing a cap to overlie the Josephson junction trilayer includes depositing at least one material selected from the group consisting of silicon dioxide (SiO.sub.2), silicon nitride (SiN), hydrogenated amorphous silicon, and an organic polymer dielectric material to overlie the Josephson junction trilayer.
12. The method of claim 7, further comprising depositing a dielectric layer to overlie the cap.
13. The method of claim 12, further comprising etching a hole through the dielectric layer and the cap to expose a top layer of the Josephson junction trilayer.
14. The method of claim 13, further comprising at least partially filling the hole with a metal that is superconductive at or below a critical temperature to form a via that provides a superconducting electrical contact between the top layer of the Josephson junction trilayer and the superconducting wiring layer.
15. The method of claim 7 wherein depositing a superconducting wiring layer to overlie the Josephson junction trilayer includes depositing at least one material selected from the group consisting of niobium, aluminum, lead, zinc, and tin to overlie the Josephson junction trilayer.
16. The method of claim 7 wherein depositing a Josephson junction trilayer to overlie a substrate includes depositing a Josephson junction trilayer to overlie at least one material selected from the group consisting of silicon, and sapphire.
17. The method of claim 7 wherein depositing a Josephson junction trilayer to overlie a substrate includes: depositing at least two layers of a metal that is superconductive at or below a critical temperature; and forming an insulating layer between an adjacent pair of layers of the at least two layers.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein depositing at least two layers of a metal that is superconductive at or below a critical temperature includes depositing niobium, and forming an insulating layer includes forming a layer of aluminum oxide.
19. A method of manufacture of a quantum computer, the method comprising fabricating an integrated circuit, the fabricating of the integrated circuit comprising: forming a quantum device, the quantum device comprising a loop of superconducting material interrupted by a Josephson junction, the forming of the quantum device comprising depositing a Josephson junction trilayer to overlie a substrate; depositing a cap to overlie the Josephson junction trilayer; depositing a superconducting wiring layer to overlie the Josephson junction trilayer; and depositing a passivating layer to overlie the superconducting wiring layer.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify similar elements or acts. The sizes and relative positions of elements in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the shapes of various elements and angles are not drawn to scale, and some of these elements are arbitrarily enlarged and positioned to improve drawing legibility. Further, the particular shapes of the elements as drawn, are not intended to convey any information regarding the actual shape of the particular elements, and have been solely selected for ease of recognition in the drawings.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(19) In the following description, certain specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various disclosed embodiments. However, one skilled in the relevant art will recognize that embodiments may be practiced without one or more of these specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures associated with superconductive circuits or structures, quantum computer circuits or structures and/or cooling systems such as evaporative refrigerators have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring descriptions of the embodiments.
(20) Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and claims which follow, the word “comprise” and variations thereof, such as, “comprises” and “comprising” are to be construed in an open, inclusive sense, that is as “including, but not limited to.”
(21) Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
(22) As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
(23) As used in this specification and the appended claims the term “carried by” or variants thereof means that one structure is directly or indirectly supported in at least some instances by another structure, for example directly on a surface thereof, spaced above or below a surface thereof by one or more intervening layers or structures or located therein.
(24) The headings and Abstract of the Disclosure provided herein are for convenience only and do not interpret the scope or meaning of the embodiments.
(25) An integrated circuit is typically fabricated over an area known as a chip or a die. In many instances, the density of circuit elements (i.e., the density of metal wiring) is not uniform over the area of the die. In multi-layered circuits involving at least one stage of planarization, these non-uniformities in wiring density can result in non-uniformities in the surface(s) of the various layers. For an evenly applied planarization force, the rate at which a dielectric layer recedes during planarization may depend on the composition of the underlying layer(s). That is, a portion of a dielectric layer that overlies a metal structure may recede at a different rate during planarization than a portion of the same dielectric layer that overlies another dielectric layer. For example, when a first dielectric layer that has a first portion carried directly on a metal layer and a second portion carried directly on a second dielectric layer is planarized, the resulting thickness of the first dielectric layer may not be uniform. In various embodiments, the non-uniformities in the planarized surface may include pits, steps, protrusions, and/or a general curvature. Such non-uniformities can adversely affect the deposition of subsequent layers and/or adversely affect the operation of the integrated circuit. In particular, non-uniformities in the thickness of a dielectric layer can introduce potentially detrimental parametric spreads in the devices included in the integrated circuit. In semiconductor fabrication practices, these non-uniformities may be mitigated by designing the integrated circuit to include idle (i.e., electrically inactive and unused) structures of filler metal in order to improve the uniformity of metal wiring density over the area of the die. In accordance with the present systems and methods, a similar approach may be adapted for use in superconducting integrated circuits, where the structures of filler metal are formed of a material that is superconducting below a critical temperature in order to avoid introducing unwanted sources of thermal energy and/or magnetic fields into the circuit.
(26)
(27) The present systems and methods describe multi-material processes for the fabrication of superconducting integrated circuits. The temperature at and below which a superconductor is superconducting (the “critical temperature”) is a characteristic of the specific material being used. In some applications, it may be desirable to incorporate different materials (each with a different critical temperature) each suited to a different purpose within the integrated circuit. As an example, a superconducting integrated circuit may include components designed for magnetometry and/or thermometry for which it is desirable that the critical current be higher than it is for other components (e.g., processor components such as qubits) of the circuit. As another example, a superconducting integrated circuit may include certain components made of a first material or set of materials that produce less noise than other components made of a second material or set of materials.
(28) Quantum computers having quantum devices that can only be programmed with relatively few (e.g., approximately one or two) bits of precision may not be well-suited to solve certain types of problems. The number of bits of precision that may be achieved is typically limited by noise which may, for example, induce decoherence in quantum devices. Therefore, it can be advantageous for a superconducting quantum processor to be constructed in such a way as to minimize noise, and thereby maximize the number of bits of precision the quantum processor is able to achieve during calculations. Noise reduction is an important design consideration, and operation of superconducting qubits in the presence of noise can, among other things, limit the number of bits of precision with which data may be manipulated. The degree of susceptibility to noise is substantially greater for superconducting devices such as quantum devices, than for more traditional semiconductor devices such as digital microprocessors and/or memories. Various embodiments described herein provide systems and methods for fabricating superconducting circuits in such a way as to reduce the noise affecting the circuit elements.
(29) Magnetic Flux Noise
(30) Magnetic flux noise acting on a superconducting device may be due, at least in part, to magnetic moments, for example nuclear magnetic moments, in the materials of which the device and the materials proximate to the device are formed.
(31) A computer system, for example a quantum computer system, is formed of atoms. Atoms comprise nuclei. Nuclei can have magnetic moments, the strength of which varies by atomic isotope (see, for example, Table A.2 on pp. 337-344 of Gordy, Walter, William V. Smith, and Ralph F. Trambarulo. Microwave Spectroscopy. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1953). The magnetic moments of these nuclei create magnetic flux noise which can adversely act on sensitive computing systems or devices, for example superconducting devices such as superconducting qubits.
(32) It is highly desirable to lower magnetic flux noise in certain computing systems. For example, in systems comprising devices that store or process information using magnetic fields, magnetic flux noise can compromise or degrade the functionality of the individual devices and the computing system as a whole. Superconducting flux qubits within a quantum computer may communicate with each other, and/or with other superconducting devices, through the exchange and manipulation of magnetic flux signals. Therefore, quantum devices within a quantum computer comprising superconducting flux qubits can be highly sensitive to the effects of magnetic flux noise.
(33) The amplitude of magnetic flux noise coming from a specific material can be characterized by a dimensionless coefficient, F, referred to herein as a magnetic flux noise coefficient. The magnetic flux noise coefficient F may be defined as:
(34)
where the material contains N different atomic isotopes, γ.sub.0 is the nuclear magneton, S.sub.j is the maximum value of the nuclear spin associated with the j.sup.th isotope, γ.sub.j is the magnetic moment of the nuclear spin associated with the j.sup.th isotope, and x.sub.j is the fraction of the material containing the j.sup.th isotope. The lower the magnetic flux noise coefficient F, the less magnetic flux noise arising from nuclear magnetic moments is created by the particular material.
(35) For example, the material .sup.116Sn has zero nuclear spin and therefore has a magnetic flux noise coefficient of zero, whereas .sup.115Sn has S.sub.j=1/2, γ.sub.j=−0.91779γ.sub.0 and therefore has a magnetic flux noise coefficient of 0.458895. An equal mixture of the two has a magnetic flux noise coefficient of 0.229448.
(36) While the composition of isotopes within the system is not adjustable in situ after production and fabrication, by selecting materials with low magnetic flux noise coefficient F, magnetic flux noise arising from nuclear magnetic moments can be reduced.
(37) Superconducting quantum devices may be made primarily from niobium. For example, a superconducting quantum device may comprise a loop of superconducting niobium interrupted by a Josephson junction, wherein the Josephson junction may be formed by a layer of aluminum oxide between two layers of niobium. Niobium is often chosen as a material to produce superconducting quantum devices due to its critical temperatures of ˜9.3 K, well above the evaporation temperature of liquid helium at ˜4.2 K which allows for simplified testing procedures.
(38) Niobium, however, has a very high magnetic flux noise coefficient value, with S.sub.j=9/2 and γ.sub.j=6.1659γ.sub.0 giving a magnetic flux noise coefficient of 27.747. A person of skill in the art would appreciate that this value is high compared to most other elements of the periodic table. Aluminum, another material often used in the fabrication of Josephson junctions, also has a high value of magnetic flux noise coefficient, with S.sub.j=5/2 and γ.sub.j=3.6408γ.sub.0 giving a magnetic flux noise coefficient of 9.102. Zinc, tin, and lead, however all exhibit relatively low nuclear spins and nuclear magnetic moments. Zinc has zero nuclear spin for all isotopes except .sup.68Zn which has a spin of 5/2 and a nuclear magnetic moment of 0.87378γ.sub.0. The magnetic flux noise coefficient of zinc is 0.0873. Tin has zero nuclear spin for all isotopes except .sup.115Sn, .sup.117Sn and .sup.119Sn which all have spins of ½ and respective nuclear magnetic moments of −0.91779γ.sub.0, −0.99982γ.sub.0 and −1.04600γ.sub.0. The magnetic flux noise coefficient of tin is 0.0843. Lead has zero spin for all isotopes except .sup.207Pb which has nuclear spin ½ and a nuclear magnetic moment of 0.58950γ.sub.0. The magnetic flux noise coefficient of lead is 0.06222.
(39) By reducing the amount of niobium and aluminum within the quantum devices, such as within qubit structures and coupler structures, magnetic flux noise due to nuclear spins may be reduced. While eliminating niobium completely from the structures of quantum devices may significantly reduce magnetic flux noise arising from nuclear spins, technologies developed to produce Josephson junctions from a layer of aluminum oxide between two bulk depositions of niobium are well-suited to produce Josephson junctions of high quality. It may therefore be beneficial to construct quantum devices of at least one distinct bulk material which has more favorable characteristics regarding its contribution to magnetic flux noise, in conjunction with Josephson junctions formed of aluminum oxide and niobium.
(40) A quantum computer may take the form of an integrated circuit comprising a plurality of quantum devices such as a quantum device 200 depicted in
(41) A person of skill in the art would appreciate that
(42) The same principles described for
(43) Planarization
(44) Traditionally, as shown in
(45) Trilayer Josephson junctions have been deposited upon dielectric layers such as silicon dioxide. See, for example, Nagasawa et al., Physica C 412-414 (2004) 1429-1436, Satoh et. al., Physica C 412-414 (2004) 1447-1450, and Satoh, et al., IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 15, No. 2, June 2005. In particular, a planarization technology called caldera is discussed. Reactive ion etching (RIE) with a reverse mask, bias sputtering and mechanical polishing planarization (MPP) were used to produce flat surfaces upon which Josephson junctions were deposited. This approach has allowed six or more successive metal layers, having Josephson junctions, and dielectric layers to be deposited and planarized, wherein the layers may have been made substantially flat such that the number of and severity of surface features present on the planarized metal and dielectric layers did not interfere with the performance of the superconducting integrated circuit produced in this fabrication process. First a niobium wiring layer is deposited and a silicon dioxide (SiO.sub.2) or similar dielectric layer is deposited. Then photoresist is deposited using a reverse mask of the niobium wiring layer. The SiO.sub.2 not covered by photoresist is then etched away through reactive ion etching (RIE) and then the photoresist is removed through a wet chemical process. Minimizing the amount of photoresist used within the fabrication process of circuits having Josephson junctions is desirable as the chemicals used to remove photoresist can result in the degradation and/or destruction of delicate Josephson junctions. Narrow convex SiO.sub.2 features along the edges of the niobium wiring which are formed through this process are then removed through MPP. Then, Josephson junctions are deposited upon the now fairly flat and featureless SiO.sub.2 surface. It should be noted that this process of using the reverse mask creates “volcano” structures atop the SiO.sub.2 surrounding metal wiring deposited in the layer below the SiO.sub.2 which may not be fully removed during planarization. The number of steps required in this process is high and with each process step, the yield of the process tends to decrease. Therefore, a simpler process having relatively fewer steps would be advantageous if such simpler process were able to produce the same if not better results. Such a simpler process is now described.
(46) The use of chemical-mechanical polishing planarization (CMP) allows for a near flat surface to be produced. Also, CMP is a standard process in the semiconductor industry. Satoh, et al., IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 15, No. 2, June 2005 however states “it is difficult to obtain sufficient flatness when using CMP to produce patterns of various sizes and densities. Wider or denser patterns need a longer polishing time to achieve the required flatness.” The CMP process uses an abrasive and corrosive chemical slurry in conjunction with a polishing pad and retaining ring, typically of a greater width than the wafer. The pad and wafer are pressed together by a dynamic polishing head and held in place by a plastic retaining ring. The dynamic polishing head is rotated with different axes of rotation (i.e., not concentric). This removes material and tends to even out any irregular topography, making the wafer flat or planar. The process of material removal is not simply that of abrasive scraping, like sandpaper on wood. The chemicals in the slurry also react with and/or weaken the material to be removed such that certain materials can be preferentially removed while leaving others relatively intact. The abrasive accelerates this weakening process and the polishing pad helps to wipe the reacted materials from the surface. Advanced slurries can be used to preferentially remove areas of the wafer which are relatively high or protrude in relation to areas of the wafer which are relatively low in order to planarize the topography of the wafer.
(47) Further, multiple superconducting layers require superconducting interconnection vias to allow for superconducting electrical communication between layers of superconducting wiring. Hinode et al., Physica C 426-432 (2005) 1533-154 discusses vias produced to allow for this integration and difficulties unique to superconducting vias. Vias produced here are 0.4 micrometers in depth and 0.6 micrometers in width therefore having a depth-to-width “aspect ratio [of] ˜70%” or 0.667:1. Persons of skill in the art would appreciate that niobium does not fill high aspect ratio holes well due to its inherent chemical nature, making it difficult to form high aspect ratio vias using niobium. Further, see, e.g., National Security Agency: Office of Corporate Assessments, “Superconducting Technology Assessment” (August 2005) where plug technology for vias is discussed but no discussions of interconnection vias are made. Plug technology may require either MPP or CMP processing of niobium. Semiconductor fabrication facilities may not allow MPP or CMP processing of niobium due to the risk of contamination of MPP and CMP equipment. This risk can be avoided by the use of interconnection vias.
(48)
(49) The CMP process may flatten second dielectric layer 550a into a smoother dielectric layer having few surface features and a relatively flat topology, such as second dielectric layer 550b of
(50) The CMP process may not provide a sufficiently flat second dielectric layer 550b to allow for the deposition of Josephson junctions with high yields. This situation is illustrated by second dielectric layer 550d in
(51) Dielectric layers 530, 550a-550e are used to isolate metal layers within integrated circuit 500. Defects, such as voids and impurities, in the dielectric layers 530, 550a-550e may introduce noise within superconducting quantum devices due to voltage fluctuations within two level systems caused by the defects. If the dielectric layers 530, 550a-550e do not each form a respective uniform crystalline or polycrystalline structure and, instead, contain random bonds and voids, two level systems may be created where electrons tunnel between two energy potentials at microwave frequencies. This tunneling may generate noise within the dielectric which can affect quantum devices, such as those devices made in metal layers 520, 540 and Josephson junction 560. Quantum devices may interact with the defects which may cause the coherence of the quantum devices to be disrupted thereby producing errors during quantum computation or other forms of computation requiring a high number of bits of precision. Standard semiconductor devices are typically not adversely affected by such noise.
(52) To reduce the amount of interference produced by imperfections within dielectric layers 530, 550a-550e, these layers may be incorporated into the integrated circuit 500 at high temperatures. Producing dielectric layers 530, 550a-550e at temperatures at and/or below about 200 degrees Celsius may result in high numbers of defects within dielectric layers 530, 550a-550e. Increasing the temperature at which the dielectric layers 530, 550a-550e are deposited may decrease the number of defects within the dielectric. At higher temperatures, such as temperatures above ˜400 degrees Celsius, low-defect density dielectrics may be formed by the dielectric layers 530, 550a-550e which may reduce noise which adversely affects quantum devices.
(53) Superconducting devices, such as Josephson junction 560, may be delicate and susceptible to damage should they be heated above temperatures of about 200 degrees Celsius. After incorporating Josephson junction 560 into the integrated circuit 500, all additional fabrication acts which follow the deposition and formation of Josephson junction 560 should typically not be performed at temperatures above about 200 degrees Celsius to avoid the risk of degradation of the Josephson junction 560. Therefore, creating an integrated circuit 500 with Josephson junction 560 deposited atop of dielectric layers 530, 550a-550e, allows dielectric layers 530, 550a-550e to be advantageously produced at higher temperatures before Josephson junction 560 is formed. This process may result in better performance of integrated circuit 500 compared to, for example, circuit 400 that has the Josephson junction trilayer 420 deposited on the substrate 410.
(54) Silicon deposited at lower temperatures may be passivated, for example with hydrogen, to create hydrogenated amorphous silicon. The hydrogen bonds itself to defects within the silicon so as to reduce the number of two level systems within the dielectric and at surface interfaces of the dielectric. Further, deuterium may be used to passivate the dielectric so as to reduce the amount of noise from spins in the nucleus of .sup.1H. Such may reduce the amount of noise coupled into the quantum devices from the environment.
(55)
(56) The process 570 described in
(57) As previously described, depositing a dielectric layer at a higher temperature can be advantageous because it can help reduce the number of defects in the dielectric. As a specific example, depositing a dielectric material at a higher temperature can help reduce the size and/or number of and/or presence of unwanted voids in the dielectric. Voids may be unwanted in a dielectric layer if a metal layer is to be subsequently deposited, since the voids may then be filled with the metal to provide an unwanted conduit for electrical conduction through the dielectric. Deposition at higher temperatures can help to mitigate voids because a dielectric material may flow more readily at higher temperatures than at lower temperatures. Unfortunately, any dielectric layer that is deposited after the deposition of a Josephson junction trilayer is typically done so at a lower temperature in order to reduce the risk of junction degradation. In accordance with the present systems and methods, the presence of voids in a dielectric layer may be mitigated by using a high density plasma (“HDP”) process during deposition of the dielectric layer. In some embodiments, the HDP process may involve alternating between depositing and etching the dielectric layer in order to ensure that at least some voids are exposed and filled during the deposition process.
(58) Resistors
(59) Superconducting integrated circuits may incorporate devices which rely on resistors to function. At cryogenic temperatures, many metals superconduct which makes them poorly suited to function as resistors. Some materials, such as palladium and gold, which function well as resistors, are not easily integrated into existing multipurpose semiconductor fabrication facilities. Palladium reacts readily with many materials used within multipurpose semiconductor fabrication facilities and therefore the fabrication facilities will typically not allow the use of palladium on machines which are used by other clients or processes. Similarly, gold is not allowed in most conventional semiconductor fabrication facilities as it may contaminate machines used during CMOS production. Nevertheless, the use of both palladium and/or gold as resistors may be desirable in superconducting integrated circuits.
(60) Platinum is very nonreactive with other materials and may act as a resistor at milliKelvin temperatures, so is well suited to form resistors for superconducting integrated circuits produced in multipurpose semiconductor fabrication facilities.
(61) Further materials which may act as resistors at cryogenic temperatures include, but are not limited to, palladium gold, molybdenum and non-stoichiometric niobium nitride (NbNx).
(62)
(63) A resistor may be placed within a wiring layer carried on a dielectric layer which is not the substrate. There may be thermal coupling (i.e., “syncing”) between the resistor carried on the dielectric layer and the substrate wherein the thermal contact between the resistor and the substrate is strong to allow heat generated within the resistor to be removed from the integrated circuit efficiently and quickly without heating up components near the resistor. The thermal coupling may advantageously be thermally conductive coupling. There may be a resistor carried on two different layers of an integrated circuit. There may be thin-film cooling fins attached to the resistor, as described by Vinante et al., Physical Review B 75, 104303 (2007), where fins may cool resistors by increasing the likelihood of electron-phonon interactions. The volume of the fin may be several orders of magnitude larger than the volume of the resistor to give a much larger effective volume available for electron-phonon interactions, reducing the overheating due to the hot-electron effect.
(64)
(65) Further, integrated circuit 600c is shown in
(66)
(67) Further, integrated circuit 600e is shown in
(68)
(69) Further, integrated circuit 701c is shown in
(70)
(71) Hard Mask for Josephson Junction
(72) The behavior of a typical Josephson junction is very sensitive to its structure and composition. Circuits relying on uniformity between the critical currents of multiple Josephson junctions will not operate as desired when there is large variability of critical current due to the structure of the electrically insulating layers in different Josephson junctions.
(73) Many processes used in the fabrication of integrated circuits which include Josephson junctions have the potential to degrade the integrity of the electrically insulating layer of a Josephson junction. For example, the process of wet etching has the potential to damage previously-deposited Josephson junctions. Photoresist is patterned on wafers to enable selective etching of portions of the wafer that are not covered by the photoresist, while leaving areas under the photoresist intact. The removal of such photoresist is typically accomplished through a wet etch process where a chemical is brought into contact with the wafer to dissolve the photoresist while leaving the other layers (e.g., the dielectric layers and metal layers) substantially intact. The chemical, however, may have the ability to not only dissolve photoresist but to also damage the electrically insulating layer and/or the superconducting layers of a Josephson junction if such layers are exposed to the wet etching.
(74)
(75) An etch may be conducted upon integrated circuit 900a such that portions of hard mask 930 not covered with photoresist 940 are substantially etched away leaving integrated circuit 900b, as shown in
(76) A wet etch is conducted upon integrated circuit 900b to produce integrated circuit 900c, as seen in
(77) A physical etching process, such as bombardment with argon gas atoms, may then be applied to integrated circuit 900c to produce integrated circuit 900d of
(78)
(79) A cap 950 may be deposited on to integrated circuit 900e to produce integrated circuit 900f shown in
(80)
(81) In some embodiments, a CMP process may be used to thin or remove at least a portion of dielectric layer 960 and/or cap 950. Above second metal layer 923 there may be a thickness of approximately 1000 or 2000 Angstroms of at least one of cap 950 and second dielectric layer 960. Then a hole 975 is formed, for example a hole having a width of 1 micrometer or less (e.g., 0.5 micrometers or less). The hole 975 may be produced by a photoresist deposition and subsequent etching, or other process able to produce holes (e.g., submicron holes) within dielectric materials. The hole 975 may then be at least partially filled with niobium or a similar metal capable of superconducting. The depth-to-width aspect ratio of the hole 975 may be chosen to allow niobium to provide a superconducting electrical contact between second metal layer 923 and wiring layer 970. In some embodiments, the depth-to-width aspect ratio of hole 975 may be greater than 0.7:1, 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 5:1 or greater. A person of skill in the art would appreciate that vias with smaller aspect ratios may be made, such as the 0.667:1 aspect ratio discussed in Hinode et al., Physica C 426-431 (2005) 1533-1540, but the density of components of integrated circuit 900g may not be reduced as a result. Higher yields from fabrication of integrated circuit 900g may, however, be attained should the requirements for small vias be relaxed.
(82) After the deposition of wiring layer 970, and before its exposure to oxygen, a layer of SiN or titanium nitride (TiN) may be deposited in-situ atop wiring layer 970 to passivate wiring layer 970; otherwise oxides may form if oxygen is allowed to contact wiring layer 970. Oxides may cause paramagnetic impurities to form on the surface of wiring layer 970 which could cause noise within quantum devices which incorporate, or are in close proximity to, wiring layer 970. Current flowing within the metal wire 970 may couple to the paramagnetic impurities and result in, e.g., 1/f or flux noise due to fluctuating paramagnets at the surface of metal wire 970. A high quality wiring layer 970 having few impurities will enable current to flow near the surface of wiring layer 970. The current may then be affected by the effective fluctuating paramagnets due to the oxidation of wiring layer. Further, SiN and TiN layers may be used as diffusion barriers. Oxygen may diffuse into wiring layer 970 in an uncontrolled manner resulting in wiring characteristics which may be undesirable. By preventing oxidation of wiring layer 970, the current may experience reduced noise which may increase the level of precision at which a quantum computer is able to operate. Further, surface passivation of superconducting shielding, such as those discussed in US Patent Publication 2009-0008632, through the deposition of a layer of SiN or TiN may further reduce the amount of noise within a quantum computer.
(83) The purity of wiring layer 970 may also be optimized. One may deposit Nb in less than optimal conditions resulting in higher impurities within wiring layer 970 which will increase the penetration depth of wiring layer 970 from approximately 550 Angstroms to 1000 Angstroms or greater while still producing high quality Nb near Josephson junctions. Also, should niobium nitride (NbN) be deposited for wiring layer 970, as opposed to niobium, the penetration depth of wiring layer 970 would greatly increase. The penetration depth of NbN is approximately 3000 Angstroms whereas the penetration depth of high quality niobium is approximately 500 Angstroms while at superconducting temperatures. Additional materials which provide large penetration depths, such as NbTiN, may also be suitable for use in wiring layer 970.
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89) Many of the embodiments described herein are directed towards applications in superconducting quantum computation. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the requirements (e.g., tolerable levels of noise) for manipulating quantum information may be more stringent than the requirements for manipulating non-quantum information. Thus, while the various embodiments described herein are particularly well-suited for use in the fabrication of a superconducting quantum processor, these teachings may be applied to any application incorporating superconducting integrated circuitry (where the performance criteria are likely to be less stringent). For example, the various teachings provided herein may be applied in single-flux quantum (SFQ) circuits. In some instances, applying the present systems and methods in non-quantum computing applications may allow certain constraints to be relaxed. For example, an application of SFQ is likely to be less sensitive to noise than a quantum computing application, and as such a lower temperature dielectric process may readily be applied to an SFQ circuit in order to preserve Josephson junction quality with less regard for the resultant increase in dielectric defects. Furthermore, in accordance with, e.g., US Patent Publications 2008-0215850, 2009-0082209, 2009-0078931 and PCT Patent Publication WO2009149086, a superconducting quantum processor may include components, such as programming and readout components using, for example, SFQ technology, that are designed to manipulate non-quantum information.
(90) Certain aspects of the present systems and methods may be realized at room temperature, and certain aspects may be realized at a superconducting temperature. Thus, throughout this specification and the appended claims, the term “superconducting” when used to describe a physical structure such as a “superconducting metal” is used to indicate a material that is capable of behaving as a superconductor at an appropriate temperature. A superconducting material may not necessarily be acting as a superconductor at all times in all embodiments of the present systems and methods.
(91) The above description of illustrated embodiments, including what is described in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments to the precise forms disclosed. Although specific embodiments of and examples are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure, as will be recognized by those skilled in the relevant art. The teachings provided herein of the various embodiments can be applied to other superconductive circuits and structures, not necessarily the exemplary superconductive circuits and structures generally described above.
(92) The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. To the extent that they are not inconsistent with the specific teachings and definitions herein, all of the U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications assigned D-Wave Systems Inc. referred to in this specification and/or listed in the Application Data Sheet, are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety. Aspects of the embodiments can be modified, if necessary, to employ systems, circuits and concepts of the various patents, applications and publications to provide yet further embodiments.
(93) These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.