SOCE FACILITATORS FOR USE IN TREATING OR PREVENTING VIRAL INFECTIONS
20210145795 · 2021-05-20
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61K31/196
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/7012
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/7012
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K2300/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K2300/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K45/06
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/196
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K9/0078
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61K45/06
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K9/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
The invention provides an agent for the treatment or prevention of viral infection in a subject. The agent is preferably a compound of Formula (I)
##STR00001##
wherein R.sup.1-R.sup.11, X, Y and Q are as defined herein. Also provided are pharmaceutical compositions and combinations comprising such agents. An in vitro method of evaluating the antiviral activity or potential antiviral activity of a compound against a virus is also provided.
Claims
1. A Store-Operated Ca.sup.2+ Entry (SOCE) facilitator for use in the treatment or prevention of viral infection in a subject.
2. An SOCE facilitator for use according to claim 1 wherein said SOCE facilitator is an inhibitor of the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca.sup.2+-ATPase (SERCA) pump.
3. An SOCE facilitator for use according to claim 2 wherein inhibition of the SERCA pump results in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) calcium store depletion and extracellular calcium influx.
4. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein said SOCE facilitator inhibits progeny virus production from infected cells.
5. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said SOCE facilitator does not significantly decrease viral RNA expression.
6. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said SOCE facilitator inhibits virus replication in infected cells in the subject.
7. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said SOCE facilitator inhibits virus replication in infected respiratory epithelial cells in the subject.
8. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said SOCE facilitator is a sesquiterpene or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof.
9. An SOCE facilitator for use according to claim 8 wherein said SOCE facilitator is a sesquiterpene lactone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof.
10. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof, ##STR00017## wherein: X is selected from >C═R.sup.A, >CH—R.sup.A and —O—; Y is selected from >C═O and >CH—OR.sup.Y; R.sup.Y is selected from H, R.sup.Z, and —C(O)—R.sup.Z; wherein R.sup.Z is a C.sub.1-2 alkyl group and wherein R.sup.Z is unsubstituted or is substituted with —COOH or —C.sub.6H.sub.4COOH; Q is a bond or is CR.sup.12R.sup.13 wherein R.sup.12 and R.sup.13 are each independently selected from H and methyl; the moiety ##STR00018## is selected from ##STR00019## R.sup.5, R.sup.6 and R.sup.7 are each independently selected from H and methyl; R.sup.9 is selected from H, —OH, unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl and —OC(O)R.sup.B; R.sup.8 and R.sup.10 if present are each independently selected from H and methyl; Each RB is independently selected from unsubstituted C.sub.1-7 alkyl and unsubstituted C.sub.2-7 alkenyl; and wherein when X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A: R.sup.11 is bonded to R.sup.A to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 5-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by 2 to 4 groups independently selected from —OH, unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl, oxo and —OC(O)R.sup.B; R.sup.1 is selected from H and methyl and R.sup.2 is selected from H, —OH and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl; or R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 together form a methylene moiety such that >CR.sup.1R.sup.2 is >C═CH.sub.2; R.sup.3 is selected from H, —OH and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl; R.sup.4 is selected from H, —OH, unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl and —OC(O)R.sup.B; and when X is O, R.sup.1 is selected from H and methyl; R.sup.11 is —O— and R.sup.3 is —O— and R.sup.11 is bonded to R.sup.3 to form a —O—O— linker group; R.sup.4 is bonded to R.sup.2 to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 6-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by 1 to 3 groups independently selected from —OH and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl.
11. An SOCE facilitator for use according to claim 10 wherein: R5 is H; and/or R6 is H; and/or R7 is H.
12. An SOCE facilitator for use according to claim 10 or claim 11 wherein X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A.
13. An SOCE facilitator for use according to claim 12 wherein R.sup.11 is bonded to R.sup.A to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 5-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by (i) two —OC(O)R.sup.B groups and by one unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl group or (ii) one oxo group and one unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl group.
14. An SOCE facilitator for use according to claim 13 wherein R.sup.11 is bonded to R.sup.A to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 5-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by (i) one methyl group; (ii) one —OC(O)—C.sub.7H.sub.15 group and (iii) one —OC(O)—C.sub.4H.sub.7 group.
15. An SOCE facilitator for use according to claim 13 wherein R.sup.11 is bonded to R.sup.A to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 5-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by (i) one oxo group and (ii) one methyl group.
16. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of claims 10 to 15 wherein said SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (II) or formula (III) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof: ##STR00020##
17. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of claims 10 to 16 wherein said SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IIa) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof: ##STR00021##
18. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of claims 10 to 16 wherein said SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IIIa) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof: ##STR00022##
19. An SOCE facilitator for use according to 10 or claim 11 wherein X is —O—.
20. An SOCE facilitator for use according to claim 19 wherein R.sup.4 is bonded to R.sup.2 to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 6-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by 1 unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl group.
21. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of claims 10 to 11 or 19 to 20 wherein said SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IV) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof: ##STR00023##
22. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of claims 10 to 11 or 19 to 21 wherein said SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IVa) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof: ##STR00024##
23. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of claims 10 to 22 wherein Y is >C═O.
24. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said SOCE facilitator is thapsigargin, artemisinin, (+)-ledene, dehydroleucodine, or valerenic acid; or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug of thapsigargin, artemisinin, (+)-ledene, dehydroleucodine, or valerenic acid.
25. A compound for use in the treatment or prevention of viral infection in a subject in need thereof, wherein said compound is a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone, wherein preferably said sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone is as defined in any one of claims 10 to 24.
26. A pharmaceutical composition for use in the treatment or prevention of viral infection in a subject in need thereof comprising an SOCE facilitator as defined in any one of claims 1 to 24 or a compound as defined in claim 25 together with at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent.
27. A combination comprising (i) an SOCE facilitator, wherein said SOCE facilitator is preferably as defined in any one of claims 1 to 24; or a compound as defined in claim 25; (ii) an additional antiviral agent; and optionally (iii) at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent.
28. A combination according to claim 27 for use in the treatment or prevention of viral infection in a subject in need thereof.
29. A combination according to claim 27 or combination for use according to claim 28 wherein the antiviral agent is selected from zanamivir, oseltamivir, peramivir, amantadine or rimantadine, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of any of the preceding agents.
30. An SOCE facilitator for use according to any one of claims 1 to 24, a compound for use according to claim 25; a pharmaceutical composition for use according to 26 or a combination for use according to claim 28 or claim 29, wherein the viral infection is caused by an RNA virus.
31. An SOCE facilitator for use, compound for use, pharmaceutical composition for use or combination for use according to claim 30 wherein the viral infection is caused by an influenza virus.
32. An SOCE facilitator, compound, pharmaceutical composition or combination for use according to claim 31 wherein the influenza virus is selected from one or more a human influenza A viruses and/or avian influenza A viruses, wherein preferably the influenza virus is selected from one or more of H1N1, H3N2, H5N1, H5N6 and H7N9 viruses.
33. An SOCE facilitator for use, compound for use, pharmaceutical composition for use or combination for use according to claim 30 wherein the viral infection is caused by a virus of the Paramyxoviridae family, preferably respiratory syncytial virus.
34. An SOCE facilitator, compound, pharmaceutical composition or combination for use according to any one of claims 1 to 26 or 28 to 33, wherein said use comprises pulmonary administration of the SOCE facilitator, pharmaceutical composition or combination to the subject.
35. A method of treating or preventing viral infection in a subject, wherein said method comprises administration to the subject of an SOCE facilitator as defined in any one of claims 1 to 24, a compound as defined in claim 25, a pharmaceutical composition as defined in claim 26; or a combination according to any one of claims 27 to 29.
36. An SOCE facilitator as defined in any one of claims 1 to 24, a compound as defined in claim 25; a pharmaceutical composition as defined in claim 26; or a combination according to any one of claims 27 to 29, for use in the manufacture of a medicament for treating or preventing viral infection in a subject.
37. An aerosol formulation comprising an SOCE facilitator or a compound which is a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone.
38. An aerosol formulation according to claim 37 wherein the SOCE facilitator is as defined in any one of claims 2 to 24, wherein the compound which is a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone is as defined in claim 25; and/or wherein the SOCE facilitator or compound is present in a pharmaceutical composition or combination as defined in any one of claims 26 to 29.
39. An in vitro method of evaluating the antiviral activity or potential antiviral activity of a compound against a virus, comprising assessing the activity of the compound to facilitate CRAC entry mediated SOCE.
40. A method according to claim 39 further comprising assessing the activity of the compound to reduce infection of cells by the virus.
41. A method according to claim 39 or claim 40 wherein: i) a fluorescence-based assay for detecting intracellular calcium mobilization is used to assess the activity of the compound to facilitate CRAC entry mediated SOCE; and/or ii) a hemagglutination assay is used to assess the activity of the compound to reduce virus production from infected cells; and/or iii) evaluating the antiviral activity or potential antiviral activity of the compound comprises comparing the extent to which the compound (i) facilitates CRAC entry mediated SOCE and optionally (ii) prevents infection of cells by the virus with that of a reference compound, wherein the reference compound is preferably an SOCE facilitator as defined in any one of claims 1 to 24; and/or iv) the method comprises the high-throughput screening of multiple compounds; and/or v) the virus is an RNA virus, preferably an influenza virus or a virus of the Paramyxoviridae family, more preferably an influenza A virus.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0053] Definitions
[0054] As used herein, a C.sub.1-7 alkyl group is a linear or branched alkyl group containing from 1 to 7 carbon atoms. A C.sub.7 alkyl group may be n-heptyl. A C.sub.1-7 alkyl group is often a C.sub.2-4 alkyl group. Examples of C.sub.1-4 alkyl groups include methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, iso-propyl, n-butyl, iso-butyl, sec-butyl, and tert-butyl. A C.sub.1-4 alkyl group is often a C.sub.1-2 alkyl group or a C.sub.2-4 alkyl group. A C.sub.1 to C.sub.2 alkyl group is methyl or ethyl, typically methyl. A C.sub.2-4 is often an n-propyl group. For the avoidance of doubt, where two alkyl groups are present, the alkyl groups may be the same or different.
[0055] As used herein, a C.sub.2-7 alkenyl group is a linear or branched alkenyl group containing from 2 to 7 carbon atoms and having one or more, e.g. one or two, typically one double bonds. Typically a C.sub.2-7 alkenyl group is a C.sub.3-5 alkenyl group. Examples of C.sub.3-5 alkenyl groups include propenyl, butenyl and pentenyl. A C.sub.3-5 alkenyl group is typically a C.sub.4 alkyenyl group such as n-butenyl or but-2-en-2-yl; typically but-2-en-2-yl (—C.sub.4H.sub.7). For the avoidance of doubt, where two alkenyl groups are present, the alkenyl groups may be the same or different.
[0056] An alkyl or alkenyl group as used herein may be unsubstituted or substituted. Unless otherwise stated, substituted alkyl, alkenyl or alkynyl groups typically carry one or more, e.g. 1, 2, 3 or 4, such as one, two or three e.g. one, or two, e.g. one substituent selected from —COOH, —C.sub.6H.sub.4—COOH, halogen, —OH and the like; typically the substituent is selected from —COOH and —C.sub.6H.sub.4—COOH. The substituents on a substituted alkyl, alkenyl or alkynyl group are typically themselves unsubstituted unless otherwise stated. Where more than one substituent is present, these may be the same or different.
[0057] As used herein, a halogen is typically chlorine, fluorine, bromine or iodine and is preferably chlorine, bromine or fluorine, especially chorine or fluorine, especially fluorine.
[0058] As used herein, an oxo group is an oxygen atom bonded by a double bond to carbon or another element; for example an oxo group may be bonded to carbon to form a >C═O moiety.
[0059] A 5-membered carbocyclic group is a cyclic hydrocarbon containing 5 carbon atoms. A 6-membered carbocyclic group is a cyclic hydrocarbon containing 6 carbon atoms. A carbocyclic group may be saturated or partially unsaturated. A 5-membered partially unsaturated carbocyclic group is a cyclic hydrocarbon containing 5 carbon atoms and containing 1 or 2, e.g. 1 double bond. A 6-membered partially unsaturated carbocyclic group is a cyclic hydrocarbon containing 6 carbon atoms and containing 1 or 2, e.g. 1 double bond. Examples of 5- and 6-membered carbocyclic groups include cyclopentyl, cyclopentenyl, and cyclohexyl groups. A 5- or 6-membered carbocyclic group can be fused to another group such as a further cyclic group to form a fused ring compound.
[0060] As used herein, a fused ring compound is a compound comprising two cyclic moieties sharing a common bond between two atoms.
[0061] A carbocyclic group may be unsubstituted or substituted as described herein. For example, a carbocyclic group may be unsubstituted or substituted with 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, typically 1, 2, 3 or 4 such as e.g. 1, 2 or 3 substituents. Suitable substituents include alkyl groups, —OH; —OC(O)R.sup.B (wherein R.sup.B is as defined herein), halogen groups and the like. The substituents on a substituted carbocyclic group are typically themselves unsubstituted, unless otherwise stated.
[0062] As used herein, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt is a salt with a pharmaceutically acceptable acid or base. Pharmaceutically acceptable acids include both inorganic acids such as hydrochloric, sulphuric, phosphoric, diphosphoric, hydrobromic or nitric acid and organic acids such as oxalic, citric, fumaric, maleic, malic, ascorbic, succinic, tartaric, benzoic, acetic, methanesulphonic, ethanesulphonic, benzenesulphonic or p-toluenesulphonic acid. Pharmaceutically acceptable bases include alkali metal (e.g. sodium or potassium) and alkali earth metal (e.g. calcium or magnesium) hydroxides and organic bases such as alkyl amines, aralkyl amines and heterocyclic amines. Hydrochloride salts and acetate salts are preferred, in particular hydrochloride salts.
[0063] In Formula (I), the stereochemistry is not limited unless otherwise specified. In particular, compounds of Formula (I) containing one or more chiral centre may be used in enantiomerically or diastereoisomerically pure form, or in the form of a mixture of isomers unless otherwise specified. Further, for the avoidance of doubt, such compounds may be used in any tautomeric form. Typically, the agent or substance described herein contains at least 50%, preferably at least 60, 75%, 90% or 95% of a compound according to Formula (I) which is enantiomerically or diasteriomerically pure. Typically, a compound of the invention comprises by weight at least 60%, such as at least 75%, 90%, or 95% of a single enantiomer or diastereomer. Preferably, the compound is substantially optically pure.
[0064] As used herein, a prodrug of a compound is a compound that readily undergoes chemical changes under physiological conditions to provide the active drug (the “parent compound”). Prodrugs can also be converted to the active drug compound by chemical or biochemical methods in an ex vivo environment. Prodrugs are typically pharmacologically inactive until converted into the active drug. Prodrugs are typically obtained by masking a functional group in the drug believed to be in part required for activity with a progroup to form a promoiety which undergoes a transformation, such as cleavage, under the specified conditions of use to release the functional group, and hence the active drug. Cleavage of the promoiety may proceed spontaneously (e.g. by hydrolysis) or may be induced by another (endogenous or exogenous) agent, e.g. exposure to an enzyme, light, acid or base, etc. Progroups are typically attached to the functional group of the active drug via bonds that are cleavable under specified conditions of use. A progroup is the portion of a promoiety that cleaves to release the functional group once administered to a subject. Progroups suitable for masking functional groups in active compounds are well-known in the art. A hydroxyl functional group may be masked as a sulfonate, ester (such as acetate or maleate) or carbonate promoiety, which may be hydrolyzed in vivo to provide the hydroxyl group. An amino functional group may be masked as an amide, carbamate, imine, urea, phosphenyl, phosphoryl or sulfenyl promoiety, which may be hydrolyzed in vivo to provide the amino group. A carboxyl group may be masked as an ester (including methyl, ethyl, pivaloyloxymethyl, silyl esters and thioesters), amide or hydrazide promoiety, which may be hydrolyzed in vivo to provide the carboxyl group.
[0065] As used herein, a derivative of a compound (e.g. an active drug) is a compound having a structure derived from the structure of a parent compound (e.g. a compound such as an SOCE facilitator disclosed herein) and whose structure is sufficiently similar to those disclosed herein and based upon that similarity, would be expected by one skilled in the art to exhibit the same or similar activities and utilities as the parent compound, or to induce, as a precursor, the same or similar activities and utilities as the parent compounds. Exemplary derivatives include salts, esters, amides, salts of esters or amides, pegylated derivatives of a parent compound and N-oxides of a parent compound.
[0066] SOCE Facilitators and Their Uses
[0067] As set out above, the invention provides a Store-Operated Ca.sup.2+ Entry (SOCE) facilitator for use in the treatment or prevention of viral infection in a subject. An SOCE facilitator is typically an SOCE activator. An SOCE facilitator can also be described as an SOCE inducer. A compound which causes SOCE, i.e. the activated function of the STIM-Orai complex (described above) in directing extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx into the cell, is an SOCE facilitator as used herein. An SOCE facilitator (also known as an SOCE agonist) typically activates the ORAI channel to trigger extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx into the cell. An SOCE facilitator may or may not cause ER calcium store depletion and ER stress. SOCE facilitators (and uses thereof) which activate the ORAI channel to trigger extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx into the cell but which do not cause ER calcium store depletion and/or ER stress are within the scope of the invention. Typically, however, the SOCE facilitator does cause ER calcium store depletion and/or ER stress as well as activating the ORAI channel to trigger extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx into the cell.
[0068] It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the SOCE facilitator thus elevates intracellular calcium (Ca.sup.2+) levels. Accordingly, those skilled in the art will appreciate that SOCE may specifically refer to the activated function of the STIM-Orai complex in directing extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx. CRAC entry relates to depletion of Ca.sup.2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) store and associated SOCE. Furthermore, a compound that facilitates transient SOCE during infection to induce a potent antiviral state may not necessarily cause overt extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx during exposure to uninfected healthy cells.
[0069] Preferably, the SOCE facilitator is an inhibitor of the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca.sup.2+-ATPase (SERCA) pump. The SERCA pump resides in the endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic reticulum (ER) within myocytes. It is a Ca.sup.2+ ATPase that transfers Ca.sup.2+ from the cytosol of the cell to the lumen of the ER at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. The structure of purified SERCA derived from bovine muscle has been determined by X-ray crystallography (Sacchetto et al., 2012). Inhibitors of SERCA are known in the art, and can be identified by means such as by in vitro binding assays or by computational modelling of protein-ligand binding (molecular docking simulations). Known SERCA inhibitors include thapsigargin. Preferably, inhibition of the SERCA pump results in ER calcium store depletion and ensuing extracellular calcium influx. More preferably, inhibition of the SERCA pump results in ER calcium store depletion and extracellular calcium influx through activated SOCE. However, facilitation of SOCE without overt extracellular calcium influx at the point of administration can also be effective in virus inhibition. Calcium levels can be determined using methods known in the art such as fluorescence-based assays for detecting intracellular calcium mobilization.
[0070] Suitable assay kits are commercially available e.g. the Fluo-8 Ca.sup.2+ assay kit available from Abcam, used in accordance with its standard operating instructions.
[0071] The SOCE facilitator may also target other elements of the SOCE pathway without necessarily inhibiting SERCA. For example, the SOCE facilitator may activate one or more of Orai, STIM1, STIMATE and/or CRACR2A.
[0072] Preferably, in the invention, the SOCE facilitator inhibits progeny virus production from infected cells. Progeny virus production can be determined by methods known in the art such as immunodetection methods. For example, progeny virus production can be determined by immunodetection of viral nucleoprotein in MDCK cells infected with supernatant from virally-infected cells (e.g. using 6 h focus forming assays on MDCK cells), as described in Kuchipudi et al, Immunol. Cell Biol. 90:116-123 (2012). Preferably, progeny virus production (for example determined by 6 h focus forming assays) is reduced by at least 40%, e.g. at least 50%, for example at least 60%, e.g. at least 70%, more preferably at least 80% e.g. at least 90%, for example at least 95% or more, such as at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98% or at least 99% compared to progeny virus production from untreated infected cells (i.e. cells which have not been treated with the SOCE facilitator, compound, composition or combination of the invention). Preferably, the SOCE facilitator, compound, composition or combination of the invention reduces progeny viral production from NPTr cells, primary porcine muscle cells [myoblasts], primary porcine tracheal epithelial cells [PTECs] and/or primary normal human bronchial epithelial [NHBE] cells, e.g. when measured by the methods disclosed in the examples. Preferably, the SOCE facilitator induces prolonged resistance of the host subject to viral infection. The prolonged resistance preferably last at least 4 hours, such as at least 6 hours, more preferably at least 8 hours e.g. at least 12 hours such as at least 24 hours, for example at least 48 hours e.g. at least 72 hours such as at least 96 hours or more.
[0073] Typically, the SOCE facilitator does not significantly decrease viral RNA expression. Viral RNA expression can be determined by extracting total RNA from infected cells using conventional means (e.g. RNeasy Plus Minikit, Qiagen) followed by cDNA synthesis (e.g. performed using Superscript III First Strand synthesis kit) with appropriate primers for viral RNA; e.g. primers for the viral M-gene.
[0074] Preferably, the SOCE facilitator inhibits virus replication in infected cells in the subject. Any infected cell type in the subject may be targeted. Preferably, the infected cells are infected respiratory epithelial cells or non-epithelial cells such as muscle cells; more preferably the infected cells are infected respiratory epithelial cells. In some embodiments, the infected cells are not kidney cells. The SOCE facilitator thus preferably inhibits virus replication in infected respiratory epithelial cells in the subject.
[0075] Preferably, the SOCE facilitator is a sesquiterpene or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof. More preferably, the SOCE facilitator is a sesquiterpene lactone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof. A sesquiterpene is a compound typically derived from isoprene (CH.sub.2═C(CH.sub.3)—CH═CH.sub.2) units. A sesquiterpene lactone is a compound typically derived from isoprene units, and incorporating a cyclic ester (lactone) group. A sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone is typically cyclic and more typically comprises fused and/or bridged rings. Preferably, the sesquiterpene lactone is or is derived from a germacranolides, a heliangolide, a guaianolide, a pseudoguaianolide, a hypocretenolide or a eudesmanolide. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone may comprise one or more double bond(s); one or more heteroatom(s) (such as O, N and/or S; preferably O) and may preferably be functionalised. For example, a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone may comprise one or more, such as from one to 10, e.g. 3 to 10 substituents (e.g. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 substitutents) each preferably independently selected from unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl; —OH; oxo; —C(O)—R.sup.B; —R.sup.Z and —C(O)R.sup.Z wherein R.sup.B and R.sup.Z are each as described herein. As used herein, a sesquiterpene lactone may be functionalised at the lactone carbonyl moiety e.g. by replacing the carbonyl moiety with a C(H)—OR.sup.Y group wherein R.sup.Y is as described herein. Many sesquiterpenes and sesquiterpene lactones are known to the skilled person and are typically available commercially or can be derived from natural sources (e.g. plants) or synthesized or modified by known routes.
[0076] Preferably, in the invention, the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof,
##STR00002##
[0077] wherein: [0078] X is selected from >C═R.sup.A, >CH—R.sup.A and —O—; [0079] Y is selected from >C═O and >CH—OR.sup.Y; [0080] R.sup.Y is selected from H, R.sup.Z, and —C(O)—R.sup.Z; wherein R.sup.Z is a C.sub.1-2alkyl group and wherein R.sup.Z is unsubstituted or is substituted with —COOH or —C.sub.6H.sub.4COOH; [0081] Q is a bond or is CR.sup.12R.sup.13 wherein R.sup.12 and R.sup.13 are each independently selected from H and methyl; [0082] the moiety
##STR00003##
[0083] is selected from
##STR00004## [0084] R.sup.5, R.sup.6 and R.sup.7 are each independently selected from H and methyl; [0085] R.sup.9 is selected from H, —OH, unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl and —OC(O)R.sup.B; [0086] R.sup.8 and R.sup.10 if present are each independently selected from H and methyl; [0087] Each R.sub.B is independently selected from unsubstituted C.sub.1-7 alkyl and unsubstituted C.sub.2-7 alkenyl;
[0088] and wherein [0089] when X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A: [0090] R.sup.11 is bonded to R.sup.A to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 5-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by 2 to 4 groups independently selected from —OH, unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl, oxo and —OC(O)R.sup.B; [0091] R.sup.1 is selected from H and methyl and R.sup.2 is selected from H, —OH and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl; or [0092] R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 together form a methylene moiety such that >CR.sup.1R.sup.2 is >C═CH.sub.2; [0093] R.sup.3 is selected from H, —OH and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl; [0094] R.sup.4 is selected from H, —OH, unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl and —OC(O)R.sup.B;
[0095] and [0096] when X is O, [0097] R.sup.1 is selected from H and methyl; [0098] R.sup.11 is —O— and R.sup.3 is —O— and R.sup.11 is bonded to R.sup.3 to form a —O—O— linker group; [0099] R.sup.4 is bonded to R.sup.2 to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 6-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by 1 to 3 groups independently selected from —OH and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl.
[0100] Preferably, in Formula (I), R.sup.5 is H.
[0101] Preferably, in Formula (I), R.sup.6 is H.
[0102] Preferably, in Formula (I), R.sup.7 is H.
[0103] Preferably, in Formula (I), R.sup.9 is H, methyl or —OC(O)R.sup.B wherein R.sup.B is as defined herein. More preferably, R.sup.9 is H, methyl or —OC(O)R.sup.B wherein R.sup.B is unsubstituted C.sub.1-7 alkyl, preferably methyl.
[0104] In Formula (I), Y is selected from >C═O and >CH—OR.sup.Y wherein R.sup.Y is selected from H, R.sup.Z, and —C(O)—R.sup.Z; wherein R.sup.Z is a C.sub.1-2 alkyl group and wherein R.sup.Z is unsubstituted or is substituted with —COOH or —C.sub.6H.sub.4COOH. Preferably, when Y is >CH—OR.sup.Y, R.sup.Y is selected from H, unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl and —C(O)—(C.sub.2H.sub.4)—COOH. More preferably, when Y is >CH—OR.sup.Y, R.sup.Y is selected from H and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl, preferably methyl. Still more preferably, when Y is >CH—OR.sup.Y, R.sup.Y is H.
[0105] Most preferably, Y is >C═O.
[0106] In Formula (I), Q is preferably a bond or is CHCH.sub.3.
[0107] In Formula (I), the moiety
##STR00005##
[0108] is selected from
##STR00006##
[0109] For avoidance of doubt, when the moiety
##STR00007##
[0110] groups R.sup.8 and R.sup.10 are not present.
[0111] Preferably, therefore, the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof, wherein [0112] R.sup.5 is H; [0113] R.sup.6 is H; [0114] R.sup.7 is H; [0115] R.sup.9 is H, methyl or —OC(O)R.sup.B wherein R.sup.B is as defined herein; more preferably R.sup.B is unsubstituted C.sub.1-7 alkyl, e.g. methyl; [0116] Y is selected from >C═O and >CH—OR.sup.Y wherein R.sup.Y is selected from H, unsubstituted C.sub.1-2alkyl and —C(O)—(C.sub.2H.sub.4)—COOH; more preferably R.sup.Y is selected from H and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2alkyl; most preferably Y is >C═O; and [0117] Q is a bond or is CHCH.sub.3.
[0118] In Formula (I), X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A, or X is O. When X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.11 is preferably bonded to R.sup.A to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 5-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by (i) two —OC(O)R.sup.B groups and by one unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl group; or (ii) one oxo group and one unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl group. More preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.11 is bonded to R.sup.A to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, (A) a 5-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by (i) one methyl group; (ii) one —OC(O)—C.sub.7H.sub.15 group and (iii) one —OC(O)—C.sub.4H.sub.7 group; or (B) a 5-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by (i) one oxo group and (ii) one methyl group.
[0119] Preferably, in one embodiment, when X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.1 is methyl and R.sup.2 is selected from H, —OH and methyl; more preferably R.sup.1 is methyl and R.sup.2 is selected from H and —OH, most preferably —OH. Preferably, in another embodiment, when X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 together form a methylene moiety such that >CR.sup.1R.sup.2 is >C═CH.sub.2. Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A, R.sup.1 is methyl and R.sup.2 is selected from H, —OH and methyl. Preferably, when X is >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 together form a methylene moiety such that >CR.sup.1R.sup.2 is >C═CH.sub.2.
[0120] Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.3 is selected from H, —OH and methyl, more preferably R.sup.3 is selected from H and —OH, most preferably R.sup.3 is —OH. Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A, R.sup.3 is —OH. Preferably, when X is >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.3 is H.
[0121] Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.4 is selected from H and —OC(O)R.sup.B, preferably R.sup.4 is —OC(O)R.sup.B. When R.sup.4 is —OC(O)R.sup.B, R.sup.B is preferably unsubstituted C.sub.1-7 alkyl, preferably unsubstituted C.sub.2-4 alkyl, more preferably C.sub.3 alkyl. Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A, R.sup.4 is —OC(O)R.sup.B. Preferably, when X is >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.4 is H
[0122] Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.8 when present is methyl. Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.10 when present is H. Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A, the moiety
##STR00008##
[0123] Preferably, when X is >CH—R.sup.A, the moiety
##STR00009##
[0124] Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.9 is unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl, preferably methyl, or R.sup.9 is —OC(O)R.sup.B wherein R.sup.B is unsubstituted C.sub.1-7 alkyl. Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A, R.sup.9 is —OC(O)R.sup.B. Preferably, when X is >CH—R.sup.A, R.sup.9 is methyl.
[0125] Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A, Q is a bond.
[0126] Preferably, therefore, the SOCE facilitator may be a compound of formula (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof, wherein: [0127] X is >C═R.sup.A or >CH—R.sup.A; [0128] R.sup.11 is bonded to R.sup.A to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 5-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by (i) two —OC(O)R.sup.B groups and by one unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl group or (ii) one oxo group and one unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl group; [0129] R.sup.1 is methyl and R.sup.2 is —OH; or [0130] R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 together form a methylene moiety such that >CR.sup.1R.sup.2 is >C═CH.sub.2; [0131] R.sup.3 is selected from H and —OH; [0132] R.sup.4 is selected from unsubstituted H and —OC(O)R.sup.B, wherein R.sup.B is preferably unsubstituted C.sub.1-7 alkyl; [0133] R.sup.5, R.sup.6 and R.sup.7 are each H; [0134] R.sup.8 when present is methyl; [0135] R.sup.9 is methyl or is —OC(O)R.sup.B wherein R.sup.B is unsubstituted C.sub.1-7 alkyl; [0136] R.sup.10 where present is H; and/or [0137] Q is a bond.
[0138] Preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A, the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (II) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof:
##STR00010##
[0139] wherein Y, R.sup.1, R.sup.2, R.sup.3, R.sup.4, R.sup.5, R.sup.6, R.sup.7, R.sup.8, R.sup.9, R.sup.10 and R.sup.B are each independently as described herein.
[0140] More preferably, when the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (II) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof: [0141] R.sup.1 is methyl; [0142] R.sup.2 is selected from H and —OH; [0143] R.sup.3 is selected from H and —OH; [0144] R.sup.4 is —OC(O)R.sup.B, wherein R.sup.B is preferably unsubstituted C.sub.2-4 alkyl; [0145] R.sup.5 is H; [0146] R.sup.6 is H; [0147] R.sup.7 is H; [0148] R.sup.8 is methyl; [0149] R.sup.9 is —OC(O)R.sup.B wherein R.sup.B is C1.sub.7 alkyl, e.g. methyl; [0150] R.sub.10 is H [0151] Each R.sup.B is independently unsubstituted C.sub.1-7 alkyl (e.g. C.sub.7 alkyl) or C.sub.2-7 alkenyl (e.g. C.sub.4 alkenyl); and [0152] Y is selected from >C═O and >CH—OR.sup.Y wherein R.sup.Y is selected from H, unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl and —C(O)—(C.sub.2H.sub.4)—COOH; more preferably R.sup.Y is selected from H and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl; most preferably Y is >C═O.
[0153] Still more preferably, when X is >C═R.sup.A, the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IIa) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof:
##STR00011##
[0154] wherein Y is as described herein. Most preferably, when the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IIa) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof, Y is >C═O.
[0155] Preferably, when X is >CH—R.sup.A, the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (III) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof:
##STR00012##
[0156] wherein Y, R.sup.3, R.sup.4, R.sup.5, R.sup.6, R.sup.7, and R.sup.9 are each independently as described herein.
[0157] More preferably, when the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (III) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof: [0158] R.sup.3 is H; [0159] R.sup.4 is H; [0160] R.sup.5 is H; [0161] R.sup.6 is H; [0162] R.sup.7 is H; [0163] R.sup.9 is methyl; and [0164] Y is selected from >C═O and >CH—OR.sup.Y wherein R.sup.Y is selected from H, unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl and —C(O)—(C.sub.2H.sub.4)—COOH; more preferably R.sup.Y is selected from H and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2alkyl; most preferably Y is >C═O.
[0165] Still more preferably, when X is >CH—R.sup.A, the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IIIa) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof:
##STR00013##
[0166] wherein Y is as described herein. Most preferably, when the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IIIa) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof, Y is >C═O.
[0167] When X is —O—, R.sup.11 is —O— and R.sup.3 is —O— and R.sup.11 is bonded to R.sup.3 to form a —O—O— linker group.
[0168] Preferably, when X is —O—, R.sup.1 is H.
[0169] Preferably, when X is —O—, R.sup.4 is bonded to R.sup.2 to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 6-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by 1 or 2 groups independently selected from —OH and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl. More preferably, when X is —O—, R.sup.4 is bonded to R.sup.2 to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 6-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by 1 unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl group, preferably methyl.
[0170] Preferably, when X is —O—, R.sup.8 is H.
[0171] Preferably, when X is —O—, R.sup.9 is H
[0172] Preferably, when X is —O—, R.sup.10 is methyl.
[0173] Preferably, when X is —O—, Q is CR.sup.12R.sup.13 wherein R.sup.12 and R.sup.13 are each independently selected from H and methyl. More preferably, when X is —O—, Q is CHCH.sub.3.
[0174] Preferably, therefore, the SOCE facilitator may be a compound of formula (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof, wherein: [0175] X is —O—; [0176] R.sup.11 is —O— and R.sup.3 is —O— and R.sup.11 is bonded to R.sup.3 to form a —O—O— linker group; [0177] R.sup.1 is H; [0178] R.sup.4 is bonded to R.sup.2 to form, together with the atoms to which they are attached, a 6-membered carbocyclic group which is substituted by 1 unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl group, preferably methyl; [0179] R.sup.8 is H; [0180] R.sup.9 is H; [0181] R.sup.10 is methyl; and/or [0182] Q is CR.sup.12R.sup.13 wherein R.sup.12 and R.sup.13 are each independently selected from H and methyl.
[0183] Preferably, when X is —O—, the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IV) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof:
##STR00014##
[0184] wherein Y, R.sup.1, R.sup.5, R.sup.6, R.sup.7, R.sup.8, R.sup.9, R.sup.10, R.sup.12 and R.sup.13 are each independently as described herein.
[0185] More preferably, when X is —O—, when the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IV) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof: [0186] R.sup.1 is H; [0187] R.sup.5 is H; [0188] R.sup.6 is H; [0189] R.sup.7 is H; [0190] R.sup.8 is H; [0191] R.sup.9 is H; [0192] R.sup.10 is methyl; [0193] R.sup.12 is H; [0194] R.sup.13 is methyl; and [0195] Y is selected from >C═O and >CH—OR.sup.Y wherein R.sup.Y is selected from H, unsubstituted C.sub.1-2 alkyl and —C(O)—(C.sub.2H.sub.4)—COOH; more preferably R.sup.Y is selected from H and unsubstituted C.sub.1-2alkyl; most preferably Y is >C═O.
[0196] Still more preferably, when X is —O—, the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IVa) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof:
##STR00015##
[0197] wherein Y is as described herein. Most preferably, when the SOCE facilitator is a compound of formula (IVa) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof, Y is >C═O.
[0198] Preferably, the SOCE facilitator is thapsigargin, artemisinin, (+)-ledene, dehydroleucodine, or valerenic acid; or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug of is thapsigargin, artemisinin, (+)-ledene, dehydroleucodine, or valerenic acid. Most preferably, the SOCE facilitator is thapsigargin or artemisinin or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug of thapsigargin or artemisinin. The structures of thapsigargin, artemisinin, (+)-ledene, dehydroleucodine, and valerenic acid are shown below. Most preferably, the SOCE facilitator is thapsigargin.
##STR00016##
[0199] The invention also provides a compound for use in the treatment or prevention of viral infection in a subject in need thereof, wherein said compound is a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone. Preferably, the sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone is a compound of Formula (I) as defined above. More preferably, the sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone is a compound of Formula (II), (III) or (IV) as defined above. Most preferably, the sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone is a compound of Formula (IIa), (IIIa) or (IVa) as defined above. Preferred sesquiterpenes and sesquiterpene lactones are thapsigargin, artemisinin, (+)-ledene, dehydroleucodine, and valerenic acid; and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, derivatives and prodrugs of thapsigargin, artemisinin, (+)-ledene, dehydroleucodine, and valerenic acid. More preferred sesquiterpenes and sesquiterpene lactones are thapsigargin and artemisinin and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, derivatives and prodrugs thereof. Thapsigargin is most preferred.
[0200] Synthesis
[0201] An SOCE facilitator in accordance with the invention can be prepared by any suitable method. SOCE facilitators as defined herein are known in the art or are commercially available, or can be synthesized by known methods. For example, compounds of Formula (I) can typically be isolated from natural products such as from plants e.g. Artemisia annua, Artemisia douglasiana or Thapsia garganica. Chemical synthesis of compounds of Formula (I) is also possible. Common starting points include artemisinic acid. Ring closure reactions known to the skilled chemist can be employed to produce the compounds of Formula (I). Functionalisation is achieved via known routes; for example ester groups can readily by obtained by reaction of a hydroxy group with an appropriate carboxylic acid or activated form thereof. Suitable alcohol protecting groups are well known to those skilled in the art and include benzyl (Bn); [bis-(4-methoxyphenyl)phenylmethyl] (DMT); Tetrahydrofuran (THF); trimethylsilyl (TMS), tert-butyldimethylsilyl (TBDMS), tri-iso-propylsilyloxymethyl (TOM), and triisopropylsilyl (TIPS) ether protecting groups, and the like. Exemplary compounds of Formula (I) are compounds of Formula (II), (III) and (IV) above. Compounds of Formula (II) can be readily synthesized from commercially available materials such as thapsigargin. Compounds of Formula (III) can be readily synthesized from commercially available materials such as dehydroleucodine. Compounds of Formula (IV) can be synthesized from commercially available materials such as artemisinic acid. The compounds of Formula (I) are sesquiterpene lactones. The lactone group can be selectively reduced with hydride-reducing agents, such as sodium borohydride, potassium borohydride, and lithium borohydride, to yield the dihydro lactol form (i.e. when Y is >CH—OR.sup.Y and R.sup.Y is H). This form can be further functionalised (e.g. when Y is >CH—OR.sup.Y and R.sup.Y is selected from R.sup.Z, and —C(O)—R.sup.Z wherein R.sup.Z is as defined herein) by reaction of the dihydro lactol form with appropriate reagents such as with R.sup.Z—COOH. Artemisinin, dehydroleucodine and thapsigargin are both commercially available e.g. from Sigma Aldrich and can be used as starting materials for the production of compounds of Formula (I), (II), (IIa), (III), (IIIa), (IV) and (IVa) as set out above. Ledene (also known as (+)-ledene) and valerenic acid are commercially available e.g. from Sigma Aldrich.
[0202] Therapeutic Efficacy
[0203] As will be apparent from the above discussion, the SOCE facilitators, sesquiterpenes and sesquiterpene lactones used in accordance with the present invention are therapeutically useful. The invention therefore also provides the use of an SOCE facilitator or a compound which is a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone as described herein in the manufacture of a medicament for treating or preventing viral infection in a subject in need thereof. The invention also provides methods of treating or preventing viral infection using an SOCE facilitator or a compound which is a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone as described herein. For the avoidance of doubt, the SOCE facilitators used in accordance with the present invention may be administered in the form of a solvate.
[0204] Also provided is a pharmaceutical composition for use in the treatment of prevention of viral infection in a subject in need thereof comprising a compound as defined herein together with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent and optionally further comprising another antiviral agent. Typically, the composition contains up to 50 wt % of the compound. More typically, it contains up to 20 wt % of the compound, e.g. up to 10 wt % for example up to 1 wt % e.g. up to 0.1 wt % such as up to 0.01wt % e.g. up to 0.001 wt % or less. Compositions comprising low amounts (wt %) of the compound are particularly appropriate for highly active compounds. Preferred pharmaceutical compositions are sterile and pyrogen free. Further, when the pharmaceutical compositions provided by the invention contain a compound which is optically active, the compound is typically a substantially pure optical isomer.
[0205] The composition of the invention may be provided as a kit comprising instructions to enable the kit to be used in the methods described herein or details regarding which subjects the method may be used for.
[0206] As explained above, the compound used in the present invention is useful in treating or preventing viral infection in a subject in need thereof. In particular, they are inhibitors of RNA viruses.
[0207] An SOCE facilitator or compound which is a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone as described herein or may be used as a standalone therapeutic agent. For example, an SOCE facilitator or sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone as described herein may be used as a standalone adjunct in antiviral therapy. Alternatively, it may be used in combination with other antiviral agents to enhance the action of the other antiviral agent. The SOCE facilitator, sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone may find particular use in treating or preventing viral infection caused by viruses which are resistant to treatment with conventional antiviral agents (e.g. amantadine, remantadine, zanamivir, oseltamivir, laninamivir and peramivir) when administered alone. Treatment or prevention of such infection with conventional antiviral agents alone may be unsuccessful.
[0208] The present invention therefore also provides a combination comprising (i) an SOCE facilitator as defined herein or a compound which is a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone as described herein and (ii) an additional antiviral agent. The SOCE facilitator or compound which is a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone and the additional antiviral agent may be provided in a single formulation, or they may be separately formulated.
[0209] Where separately formulated, the two agents may be administered simultaneously or separately. They may be provided in the form of a kit, optionally together with instructions for their administration. The products may also be referred to herein as products or pharmaceutical combinations.
[0210] Where formulated together, the two active agents may be provided as a pharmaceutical composition comprising (i) an SOCE facilitator as described herein or a compound which is a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone as defined herein and (ii) an additional antiviral agent; and (iii) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent.
[0211] Preferably, the additional antiviral agent is an anti-neuraminidase antiviral agent or an antiviral agent that inhibits the viral M2 protein. More preferably, the antiviral agent is an anti-neuraminidase antiviral agent. Preferably, the antiviral agent is selected from amantadine, rimantadine, zanamivir, oseltamivir, laninamivir and peramivir, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of any of the preceding agents.
[0212] The combinations of the invention are also useful in treating or preventing viral infection. The present invention therefore provides a combination of the invention for use in medicine. The present invention also provides a combination of the invention for use in treating or preventing viral infection in a subject in need thereof. The invention also provides the use of a combination of the invention in the manufacture of a medicament; e.g. a medicament for treating or preventing viral infection in a subject in need thereof. The invention also provides methods of treating or preventing viral infection using the combinations of the invention.
[0213] In one aspect, the subject is a mammal, in particular a human. However, it may be non-human. Preferred non-human animals include, but are not limited to, primates, such as marmosets or monkeys, commercially farmed animals, such as horses, cows, sheep or pigs, and pets, such as dogs, cats, mice, rats, guinea pigs, ferrets, gerbils or hamsters. The subject may also be a bird. Preferred birds include commercially farmed birds such as chickens, geese, ducks, turkeys, pigeons, ostriches and quail. The subject can be any animal that is capable of being infected by a virus.
[0214] The compounds, compositions and combinations described herein are useful in the treatment of viral infection which occurs after a relapse following an antiviral treatment. The compounds, compositions and combinations can therefore be used in the treatment of a patient who has previously received antiviral treatment for the (same episode of) viral infection.
[0215] The virus causing the infection may be any infective virus. Typically the virus is an RNA virus. Typically the virus is not a DNA virus. More typically, the virus is an influenza virus, such as an influenza A virus. The virus may be a virus of the Paramyxoviridae family e.g. respiratory syncytial virus (RSV virus). Preferably, the virus does not involve in its replication cycle the maturation of progeny viral particles in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Influenza viruses and viruses in the Paramyxoviridae family (e.g. RSV virus) do not involve viral accumulation in the ER. Preferably, the virus is not a rotavirus such as a porcine rotavirus. Typically, the viral infection to be treated as described herein is resistant to treatment with a conventional antiviral agent when the conventional antiviral agent is used alone.
[0216] The viral infection may, for example, be caused by a human influenza virus such as a human influenza A virus, an avian influenza virus such as an avian influenza A virus, or a porcine influenza virus such as a porcine influenza A virus. The virus may be an epidemic or pandemic strain. The infection may be caused by a virus of strain H1N1, (e.g. pandemic 2009 H1N1), H3N2, H5N1, H5N6 or H7N9 viruses.
[0217] The virus may be a virus of the Paramyxoviridae family. Typically, a virus of the Paramyxoviridae family is selected from RSV, parainfluenza virus, measles virus and henipaviruses. Preferably the virus of the Paramyxoviridae family is RSV, such as human RSV. Experiments into the effect of compounds such as TG on RSV viruses have previously been conducted only at toxic levels of the compound leading to decreased cell viability (Cui et al, 2016), such that any observed decrease in infectivity can be assigned to apoptosis and/or cytotoxicity, rather than inhibition of viral replication and/or infectivity. The inventors have surprisingly found that a virus such as RSV can be targeted with SOCE facilitators such as TG at non-toxic levels leading to a viable treatment for such infections.
[0218] The compound, composition or combination described herein may be used to treat or prevent infections and conditions caused by any one or a combination of the above-mentioned viruses. In particular, the compound, composition or combination described herein may be used in the treatment or prevention of influenza.
[0219] A compound, composition or combination as described herein can be administered to the subject in order to prevent the onset or reoccurrence of one or more symptoms of the viral infection. This is prophylaxis. In this embodiment, the subject can be asymptomatic. The subject is typically one that has been exposed to the virus. A prophylactically effective amount of the agent or formulation is administered to such a subject. A prophylactically effective amount is an amount which prevents the onset of one or more symptoms of the viral infection.
[0220] A compound, composition or combination described herein can be administered to the subject in order to treat one or more symptoms of the viral infection. In this embodiment, the subject is typically symptomatic. A symptomatic subject may exhibit one or more of the symptoms of viral infection e.g. infection by influenza virus. For example, the subject may have one or more symptoms selected from fever and/or chills; cough; nasal congestion; rhinorrhea; sneezing; sore throat; hoarseness (dysphonia); respiratory distress; ear pressure; earache; muscle ache; fatigue; headache; irritated eyes; reddened eyes, skin (especially face), mouth, throat and/or nose; petechial rash and/or gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhoea, vomiting, and/or abdominal pain. A therapeutically effective amount of the agent or formulation is administered to such a subject. A therapeutically effective amount is an amount effective to ameliorate one or more symptoms of the disorder.
[0221] The present invention is particularly advantageous in the medical setting. A compound, composition or combination described herein can be administered to a subject following diagnosis of a viral infection, such as infection by an influenza virus. Alternatively, a compound, composition or combination described herein may be administered to a subject wherein viral infection has not previously been diagnosed. The determination of whether or not viral infection such as by an influenza virus is present may be made in the context of any disease or illness present or suspected of being present in a patient. Such diseases may include those caused by, linked to, or exacerbated by the presence of the virus. Thus, a patient may display symptoms indicating the presence of viral infection (e.g. by the influenza virus), such as a respiratory illness, and a sample may be obtained from the patient in order to determine the presence of the virus and optionally also the serotype, subtype or strain thereof. The serotype, subtype or strain of the virus can be determined by serology, immunoassay or viral culture from a sample provided by the subject. Diagnosis can also be performed based on nucleic acid derived from a sample of a patient, providing an indication to clinicians whether an illness for example a respiratory illness is due to a viral infection e.g. by influenza virus.
[0222] The compound, composition or combination may be administered in a variety of dosage forms. Thus, it can be administered orally, for example as tablets, troches, lozenges, aqueous or oily suspensions, dispersible powders or granules. Formulations of the compound, composition or combination may also be administered parenterally, whether subcutaneously, intravenously, intramuscularly, intrasternally, transdermally or by infusion techniques. Preferably, the compound, composition or combination may be administered via inhaled (aerosolised) or oral administration, most preferably by inhaled (aerosolised) administration.
[0223] The compound, composition or combination is typically formulated for administration with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent. For example, solid oral forms may contain, together with the active compound, diluents, e.g. lactose, dextrose, saccharose, cellulose, corn starch or potato starch; lubricants, e.g. silica, talc, stearic acid, magnesium or calcium stearate, and/or polyethylene glycols; binding agents; e.g. starches, arabic gums, gelatin, methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose or polyvinyl pyrrolidone; disaggregating agents, e.g. starch, alginic acid, alginates or sodium starch glycolate; effervescing mixtures; dyestuffs; sweeteners; wetting agents, such as lecithin, polysorbates, laurylsulphates; and, in general, non-toxic and pharmacologically inactive substances used in pharmaceutical formulations. Such pharmaceutical preparations may be manufactured in known manner, for example, by means of mixing, granulating, tableting, sugar coating, or film coating processes.
[0224] The compound, composition or combination may be formulated for pulmonary administration. For example, the compound, composition or combination may be formulated for inhaled (aerosolised) administration as a solution or suspension. The compound, composition or combination may be administered by a metered dose inhaler (MDI) or a nebulizer such as an electronic or jet nebulizer. Alternatively, the compound, composition or combination may be formulated for inhaled administration as a powdered drug; such formulations may be administered from a dry powder inhaler (DPI). When formulated for inhaled administration, the compound, composition or combination may be delivered in the form of particles which have a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of from 1 to 100 μm, preferably from 1 to 50 μm, more preferably from 1 to 20 μm such as from 3 to 10 μm, e.g. from 4 to 6 μm. When the compound, composition or combination is delivered as a nebulized aerosol, the reference to particle diameters defines the MMAD of the droplets of the aerosol. The MMAD can be measured by any suitable technique such as laser diffraction.
[0225] Accordingly, the invention also provides an aerosol formulation comprising an SOCE facilitator as defined herein or a compound which is a sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone. The SOCE facilitator, sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone may preferably be a compound of Formula (I) as defined herein, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof. More preferably, the SOCE facilitator, sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone in the aerosol formulation may be selected from a compound of Formula (II) (e.g. Formula (IIa)) as defined herein; or a compound of Formula (III) (e.g. Formula (IIIa)) as defined herein; or a compound of Formula (IV) (e.g. Formula (IVa)) as defined herein; or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof. Most preferably, the SOCE facilitator, sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone in the aerosol formulation may be selected from thapsigargin, artemisinin, (+)-ledene, dehydroleucodine, and valerenic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug thereof, most preferably artemisinin or thapsigargin or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, derivative or prodrug of artemisinin or thapsigargin.
[0226] Liquid dispersions for oral administration may be syrups, emulsions and suspensions. The syrups may contain as carriers, for example, saccharose or saccharose with glycerine and/or mannitol and/or sorbitol.
[0227] Suspensions and emulsions may contain as carrier, for example a natural gum, agar, sodium alginate, pectin, methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, or polyvinyl alcohol. The suspension or solutions for intramuscular injections or inhalation may contain, together with the active compound, a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, e.g. sterile water, olive oil, ethyl oleate, glycols, e.g. propylene glycol, and if desired, a suitable amount of lidocaine hydrochloride.
[0228] Solutions for inhalation, injection or infusion may contain as carrier, for example, sterile water or preferably they may be in the form of sterile, aqueous, isotonic saline solutions. Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for delivery by needleless injection, for example, transdermally, may also be used.
[0229] A therapeutically or prophylactically effective amount of the SOCE facilitator, sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone is administered to a subject. The dose may be determined according to various parameters, especially according to the compound used; the age, weight and condition of the subject to be treated; the route of administration; and the required regimen. Again, a physician will be able to determine the required route of administration and dosage for any particular subject. A typical daily dose is from about 1 ng to 100 mg per kg; for example from about 0.01 to 100 mg per kg, preferably from about 0.1 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg, e.g. from about 1 to 10 mg/kg of body weight, according to the activity of the specific inhibitor, the age, weight and conditions of the subject to be treated, the type and severity of the disease and the frequency and route of administration. Preferably, daily dosage levels are from 5 mg to 2 g.
[0230] When the SOCE facilitator is TG or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, a typical daily dose may be from about 1 ng/kg to about 10 μg/kg of body weight; e.g. from about 8 ng/kg to 2 μg/kg, e.g. from about 0.1 μg/kg to about 1 μg/kg according to the age, weight and conditions of the subject to be treated, the type and severity of the disease and the frequency and route of administration, and may preferably be administered by inhalation.
[0231] When the SOCE facilitator, sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone is administered to a subject in combination with another active agent (for example in the form of a pharmaceutical combination comprising an additional antiviral agent), the dose of the other active agent (e.g. additional antiviral agent) can be determined as described above. The dose may be determined according to various parameters, especially according to the agent used; the age, weight and condition of the subject to be treated; the route of administration; and the required regimen. Again, a physician will be able to determine the required route of administration and dosage for any particular subject. A typical daily dose is from about 0.01 to 100 mg per kg, preferably from about 0.1 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg, e.g. from about 1 to 10 mg/kg of body weight, according to the activity of the specific inhibitor, the age, weight and conditions of the subject to be treated, the type and severity of the disease and the frequency and route of administration. Preferably, daily dosage levels are from 5 mg to 2 g.
[0232] The dose is preferably administered transiently. The frequency of the administration of the dose may be determined according to various parameters, especially according to the compound used; the age, weight and condition of the subject to be treated; the route of administration; and the required regimen. Again, a physician will be able to determine the required frequency of administration for any particular subject and dosage. A typical frequency of administration is from about once per month to about 5 times per day, e.g. from about once per week to about 3 times per day, such as from about twice per week to about twice per day, e.g. once every other day or once daily, according to the activity of the specific inhibitor, the age, weight and conditions of the subject to be treated, the type and severity of the disease and the route of administration. The frequency and duration of the administration of the dose may be determined to provide an effective priming of the target cells in the subject to prevent or treat viral infection.
[0233] When multiple doses are required, the frequency of dosing may be controlled such that successive doses are administered to the patient when the plasma concentration of the
[0234] SOCE facilitator, sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone has decreased to at most 50% of the peak concentration following the previous dose, such as at most 25% of the peak concentration, e.g. at most 10% of the peak concentration, such as at most 5% of the peak concentration, e.g. at most 2% of the peak concentration, for example at most 1% of the peak concentration. Such dosage regimens reflect the finding of the present inventors that the SOCE facilitators described herein typically exhibit a sustained antiviral response following their administration.
[0235] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the dose of the SOCE facilitator, sesquiterpene or sesquiterpene lactone administered to the subject is non-toxic to the subject. The dose is preferably determined in order to provide the desired antiviral effect without inducing cytotoxic effects. The dose is thus preferably determined in order to provide the desired antiviral effect without causing cell death or without increasing cytotoxicity. A physician will be able to determine an appropriate dose according to various parameters, especially according to the compound used; the age, weight and condition of the subject to be treated; and the route of administration.
[0236] In Vitro Methods
[0237] The invention also provides an in vitro method of evaluating the antiviral activity or potential antiviral activity of a compound against a virus. The in vitro method comprises assessing the activity of the compound to activate CRAC entry mediated SOCE. Preferably, the in vitro method further comprising assessing the activity of the compound to prevent infection of cells by the virus.
[0238] The in vitro method may involve using a fluorescence-based assay for detecting intracellular calcium mobilization to assess the activity of the compound to activate CRAC entry mediated SOCE. Suitable fluorescence-based assays for detecting intracellular calcium mobilization are known in the art and include the Fluo-8 Ca.sup.2+ assay kit available from Abcam, used in accordance with its standard operating instructions. The in vitro method may involve using a hemagglutination assay to assess the activity of the compound to reduce virus production from infected cells. Protocols for conducting hemagglutination assays are well known in the art.
[0239] The in vitro method may involve evaluating the antiviral activity or potential antiviral activity of the compound by comparing the extent to which the compound (i) activates CRAC entry mediated SOCE and optionally (ii) reduces infection of cells by the virus with that of a reference compound. Preferably, the reference compound is an SOCE facilitator as defined herein. The in vitro method may involve the high-throughput screening of multiple compounds. Typically, in the in vitro method of the invention, the virus is an RNA virus, preferably an influenza virus, more preferably an influenza A virus.
[0240] The following Examples illustrate the invention. They do not however, limit the invention in any way. In this regard, it is important to understand that the particular assay used in the Examples section is designed only to provide an indication of biological activity. There are many assays available to determine biological activity, and a negative result in any one particular assay is therefore not determinative.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Materials and Method
[0241] Cells and Influenza A Viruses
[0242] Primary NHBE cells from three different donors and bronchial epithelial growth media were supplied by Promocell. PTECs were isolated from stripped tracheobronchial mucosae from eight 3- to 4-month-old pigs. Briefly, washed mucosae were incubated at 4° C. overnight with 0.06 U/ml pronase (Sigma) in a 1:1 dilution of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)-F12 medium. Supernatants containing cells were centrifuged and washed in DMEM-Glutamax (high glucose) (Invitrogen) and subsequently cultured in bronchial epithelial growth media (Promocell). Skeletal muscle cells were isolated and cultured as previously described (Sebastian et al., 2015). Immortalised NPTr cells were cultured in DMEM-Glutamax supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS) and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (P/S). MDCK cells were grown in DMEM-Glutamax (high glucose) supplemented with 10% FCS and 100 U/ml P/S. A human pandemic (pdm) H1N1 2009 (A/California/07/2009) and a human USSR H1N1 (A/USSR/77) were used in this study. All viruses were propagated in 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs and allantoic fluid was harvested at 48 h post inoculation. Virus was aliquoted and stored in −80° C. until further use.
[0243] Cell Viability and Caspase 3/7 Assays
[0244] Cells were primed for 30 min with the relevant compound (e.g. TG or other compounds) as indicated in specific experiments, rinsed three times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and cultured overnight. Cell viability based on the detection of ATP was determined using a CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay kit (Promega), and activated caspase 3 and 7 were quantified using a Caspase-Glo 3/7 Assay (Promega) kit according to manufacturer's instructions.
[0245] TG Priming of Cells
[0246] The concentrations of TG used to prime each cell type were chosen for no detectable cytotoxic effect on cell viability, based on host ATP production and caspase 3/7 activity. For TG priming pre-infection, cells were cultured in the presence of TG, typically for 30 mins, rinsed three times with PBS and followed by influenza virus infection as described below. For TG priming during infection, cells were first infected for 6 h, rinsed with PBS, primed with TG for 30 min, rinsed again three times with PBS and cultured overnight (24 h culture) in infection media. Spun supernatants were used for virus titration in MDCK cells as described below.
[0247] Infection and Progeny Virus Quantification
[0248] Infection medium for NPTr cells and pig muscle cells (myoblasts and myotubes) was Ultraculture medium (Lonza) supplemented with 100 U/ml P/S, 2 mM glutamine and 250 ng/ml L-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK) trypsin (Sigma). Infection medium of primary cells (PTECs and NHBE cells) was bronchial epithelial growth medium (Promocell) supplemented with 250 ng/ml TPCK trypsin. Cells were infected at specified multiplicity of infection (MOI) of influenza virus for 2 h in infection media, after which they were rinsed three times with PBS and incubated in fresh infection media for a further 22 h. MOI of 1.0 is the minimum volume of virus needed to infect all MDCK cells in a culture well. Quantification of infectious virus in spun culture supernatants was conducted as previously described (Kuchipudi et al., 2012) which was an immuno-cytochemical focus forming assay based on infection of MDCK cells with harvested supernatants for 6 h followed by immunodetection of viral nucleoprotein (NP). Briefly, MDCK cells infected for 6 h were fixed in acetone methanol for 10 min followed by peroxidase treatment for 10 min and incubation with a 1:8000 dilution of primary mouse monoclonal antibody to influenza nucleoprotein (Abcam) for 40 min at room temperature. The cells were subsequently rinsed with Tris-buffered saline (TBS), incubated with horse radish peroxidase-labelled polymer for 40 min. After gently rinsing with TBS, the cells were incubated with DAB substrate-chromogen solution for 7 min (Envision+system-HRP kit, Dako). Cells positive for viral nucleoprotein were counted with an inverted microscope and the mean of positive cells in four 96-wells was used to calculate infectious focus-forming units of virus per microlitre of infection volume.
[0249] Intracellular Ca.sup.2+ Monitoring Assay
[0250] Intracellular Ca.sup.2+ was measured using the Fluo-8 No Wash Calcium Assay Kit (Abcam) according to manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were grown until confluent in Nunc Microwell 96-well optical-bottom plates (black) with polymer base. The culture media were replaced with 100 μl of DMEM-Glutamax containing 1% FCS. Fluo-8 dye loading solution was further added at 100 μl to each well and incubated at room temperature for 1 h whereupon TG was added at specified concentrations for 10 min. Fluorescence intensity was measured at Ex/Em=490/525 nm.
[0251] RNA Preparation and Real-Time RT-PCR
[0252] Total RNA was extracted from cells using an RNeasy Plus Minikit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized from 0.5 or 1 μg of total RNA using Superscript III First Strand synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Expression of host genes was performed with a LightCycler-96 instrument (Roche), and computation was based on the comparative Ct approach, normalised to 18 S ribosomal RNA. Primer sequences for human RIG-I (DDX58) were 5′-GAAGG CATTG ACATT GCACA GT-3′ fwd primer and 5′-TGGTT TGGAT CATTT TGATG ACA-3′ rev primer. Human ER stress primers for DDIT3 (FH1_DDIT3 and RH1_DDIT3), HSPA5 (FH1_HSPA5 and RH1_HSPA5) and HSP90B1 (FH1_HSP90B1 and RH1_HSP90B1), human IFNB1 primers (FH1_IFNB1 and RH1_IFNB1), and human OAS1 primers (FH1_OAS1 and RH1_OAS1) were pre-made designs from Sigma-Aldrich. Primer sequences for pig RIG-I were 5′-CCCTG GTTTA GGGAC GATGA G-3′ fwd primer and 5′-AACAG GAACT GGAGA AAAGT GA-3′ rev primer, for pig OAS1 were 5′-GAGCT GCAGC GAGAC TTCCT-3′ (Pig OAS1-Forward 2) and 5′-GGCGG ATGAG GCTCT TCA-3′ (Pig OAS1-Reverse 2), and for pig PKR were 5′-TCTCC CACAA CGAGC ACATC-3′ fwd primer and 5′-ACGTA TTTGC TGAGA AGCCA TTT-3′ rev primer. Pig ER stress primers for DDIT3 (FSUS1_DDIT3 and RSUS1_DDIT3), HSPA5 (FSUS1_HSPA5 and RSUS1_HSPA5) and HSP90B1 (FSUS1_HSP90B1 and RSUS1_HSP90B1), and pig IFNB1 primers (FSUS_IFNB1 and RSUS1_IFNB1) were pre-made designs from Sigma-Aldrich. Primer sequences for USSR H1N1 virus M-gene were 5′-AGATG AGCCT TCTAA CCGAG GTCG-3′ fwd primer and 5′-TGCAA AAACA TCTTC AAGTC TCTG-3′ rev primer, and for pdm H1N1 virus M-gene were 5′-AGATG AGTCT TCTAA CCGAG GTCG fwd primer and 5′-TGCAA AGACA CTTTC CAGTC TCTG-3′ rev primer.
[0253] Western Blotting
[0254] Cells were lysed by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Santa Cruz) supplemented with 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (Santa Cruz), 1% inhibitor cocktail and 1% sodium orthovanadate (Santa Cruz). Protein concentration was determined by Bio-RAD protein assay (Bio-Rad). Primary antibodies were goat anti-viral M1 at 1:500 dilution (Abcam, ab20910), rabbit anti-viral NP at 1:500 dilution (Thermo Scientific, PAS-32242) and mouse anti-β-actin at 1:10000 (Sigma, A5316), and appropriate species-specific secondary antibodies were peroxidase-conjugated.
[0255] STIM1 and Orai1 Gene Knockdown
[0256] NHBE cells were transfected with 10 pmol/ml siRNA, using the minimum recommended volume of transfection reagent Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer's protocol. Pre-designed Silencer® Select siRNAs against ORAI1 (siRNA ID s228396), STIM1 (siRNA ID s531229) and the Silencer™ Select Negative Control No. 1 siRNA (Invitrogen) were used. Cells were exposed to the siRNA-lipid complex for 6 h before washing with PBS and cultured in fresh media. They were subsequently infected with influenza virus 48 h post transfection.
[0257] Electron Microscopy
[0258] Samples for transmission electron microscopy were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 1 h. The samples were then post fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated graded ethanol series of 50, 70, 90 and 100%, dried further in a transitional solvent, propylene oxide, infiltrated in epoxy resin and polymerised in an embedding oven at 60° C. for 48 h. Ultrathin sections were collected using a diamond knife on a Leica UC6 ultramicrotome, at 80 nm from each block, mounted on 200 mesh copper grids and stained in uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Grids were visualised on a Tecnai T12 Biotwin TEM, which ran at an accelerating voltage of 110 kV, and images were captured using a Mega View SIS camera.
[0259] Statistical Analysis
[0260] Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software). Paired student t test, one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were used to test differences between different groups. P values <0.05 were considered significant.
Example 2
[0261] This example shows that raising extracellular Ca.sup.2+ in the culture of different cell types reduced influenza virus output.
[0262] Experiments were conducted to assess the effect of extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx on influenza virus. Neonatal pig tracheal epithelial (NPTr) cells (Ferrari et al., 2003) and 12-day-old porcine primary muscle cells (myotubes) were infected with 0.5 MOI pdm H1N1 and 2.0 MOI USSR H1N1 virus (respectively) for 2 h, rinsed with PBS and subsequently kept in different [Ca.sup.2+] (calcium concentration) of culture media (100 mg/mL; 200 mg/mL; or 300 mg/mL) for 24 h.
[0263] Cell viability of each cell type (CellTiter-Glo luminescent assay, Promega), determined at 24 h of incubation, was unaffected by different [Ca.sup.2+] (100 mg/mL; 200 mg/mL; or 300 mg/mL), indicating that different Ca.sup.2+ concentrations had no adverse impact on cell viability (
[0264] The results unexpectedly show that simply raising extracellular [Ca.sup.2+] in the culture media of influenza virus infected NPTr cells and porcine myotubes resulted in significantly reduced production of progeny virus.
Example 3
[0265] This example shows that Ca.sup.2+-release activated-Ca.sup.2+ (CRAC) mediated store-operated Ca.sup.2+ entry (SOCE) in a wide range of cell types reduced influenza A virus production.
[0266] To assess the effect of extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx on influenza virus, cells were transiently exposed to thapsigargin (TG) to impede the SERCA pump (Lytton et al., 1991) leading to SOCE (Hogan and Rao, 2015). Fluo-8 No Wash Calcium Assay Kit (Abcam) was used to determine intracellular Ca.sup.2+ accumulation. Porcine myoblasts, NPTr cells, primary pig tracheal epithelial cells (PTECs) and normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells were exposed to TG, at non-toxic concentrations (0.5 μM/0.1 μM/0.01 μM; see
[0267] The results show that modest Ca.sup.2+ influx triggered by brief TG exposure (10 min) in several cell types (NPTr cells, primary porcinemyoblasts, PTECs and NHBE cells) was dependent on extracellular Ca.sup.2+, as determined by Fluo-8 Ca.sup.2+ assays (
[0268] To determine the effect of TG priming on progeny virus output from infected cells, NPTr cells (
[0269] The results in
Example 4
[0270] This example assessed the sustained effect of TG, and the priming effect of TG before or during infection in reducing influenza virus production
[0271] The results described in example 3 suggest that among the different cell types evaluated, NHBE cells appeared most sensitive to TG priming; dramatic reduction in progeny virus output was achieved by priming with as little as 5 nM TG for 30 min (
[0272] Experiments were conducted to assess the sustained antiviral effect of TG. NPTr cells were incubated with 0.5 μM TG for 30 min; PTECs were incubated with 0.1 μM TG for 30 min; myoblasts were incubated with 1.0 μM TG for 1 h. Cells were then rinsed with PBS and either immediately infected or further cultured for 24 h in normal media followed by infection (TG+24 h). NPTr cells and PTECs were infected with USSR H1N1 virus at 0.5 MOI, and myoblasts were infected with the same virus at 2.0 MOI. Spun supernatants from 24 h infected samples were used to infect MDCK cells for 6 hours in focus forming assays. Results are shown in
[0273] The results in
[0274] Further experiments were conducted to compare the antiviral activity of TG before or after an initial infection period of 6 h. Results are shown in
[0275] Variable viral M-gene expression, from corresponding infected cells normalised to 18 S rRNA, suggests post-transcriptional virus inhibition (
Example 5
[0276] This example describes experiments conducted to probe the origin of TG's antiviral activity. Without being bound by theory, the inventors believe that the results in this example indicate that TG has a role in elevating type I interferon (IFN) signalling in response to influenza virus infection.
[0277] Type I IFNs and their associated genes are essential for host defence against viruses (McNab et al., 2015). Priming of different cell types with TG, before or during infection, consistently increased the expression of type I IFN associated genes including RIG-I (retinoic acid-inducible gene 1, a cytoplasmic sensor of viral RNA) and OAS1 (2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase 1, an IFN-stimulated gene) in response to infection (
[0278] Experiments were conducted to assess whether the increased expression of RIG-I and OAS1 by TG priming occurs in a dose related manner. NPTr cells (
[0279] Without being bound by theory, the inventors consider that elevated expression of type I IFN associated genes by TG treated cells in response to infection (
Example 6
[0280] This example describes further experiments conducted to probe the origin of TG's antiviral activity. Without being bound by theory, the inventors believe that the results in this example indicate that TG has a role in interfering with influenza virus post-transcriptionally.
[0281] A feature of TG inhibition of virus production was the absence of consistent reduction in corresponding viral M-gene RNA expression (
[0282] Experiments were conducted to probe this hypothesis. NPTr cells (
Example 7
[0283] This example describes further experiments conducted to probe the origin of TG's antiviral activity. Without being bound by theory, the inventors believe that the results in this Example indicate that ER stress also contributed in part to TG mediated virus reduction.
[0284] TG-induced CRAC influx is believed to be the culmination of three signalling events: (1) ER Ca.sup.2+ store depletion, followed by (2) ER stress and (3) extracellular Ca.sup.2+ entry through activated SOCE. ER stress-induced unfolded protein response (UPR) (Krebs et al., 2015) could interfere with viral protein translation and promote host innate immune response (Janssens et al., 2014; Lencer et al., 2015; Silva et al., 2007). Experiments were therefore conducted to assess whether priming cells with non-toxic doses of TG induced ER stress in a dose dependent response. NPTr cells (
[0285] The results show that TG applied at non-toxic levels consistently elevated ER stress associated genes (DDIT3, HSPA5 and HSP90B1) in different cell types (NPTr cells, porcine myoblasts and NHBE cells) in a dose-dependent manner (
Example 8
[0286] This example describes comparative experiments demonstrating that inducing ER stress alone is not sufficient to fully account for the antiviral activity demonstrated by SOCE facilitators such as TG in accordance with the present invention.
[0287] Tunicamycin, a glycosylation inhibitor, is often used as an inducer of ER stress (Oslowski and Urano, 2011; Michelangeli et al., 1995). Experiments were conducted to examine the role of ER stress per se on influenza virus production. NPTr cells were incubated with 0.5 μg/ml or 1.0 μg/ml tunicamycin for 30 min, rinsed with PBS, and infected with USSR H1N1 or pdm H1N1 virus at 0.5 MOI for 24 h. TG exposure, at 0.5 μM for 30 min prior to infection, served as a positive control (
[0288] NPTr cells were primed for 30 min before infection with non-toxic doses of tunicamycin that did not affect cell viability nor extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx (
Example 9
[0289] This example describes further experiments conducted to probe the origin of TG's antiviral activity. Without being bound by theory, the inventors believe that the results in this example indicate that facilitation of SOCE function (here by the over-expression of structural and positive regulatory SOCE genes) inhibits virus production.
[0290] To further investigate the role of SOCE in influenza virus inhibition, structural members of SOCE, STIM1 and Orai1 to 3 isoforms, were over-expressed in NPTr cells (
[0291] NPTr cells, transiently transfected with the indicated plasmids for 2 days, were infected with USSR H1N1 virus at 0.5 MOI for 24 h. Spun supernatants were used in focus forming assays on MDCK cells infected for 6 h and immunostained for viral NP positive cells (
[0292] In further experiments, porcine myoblasts, transiently transfected with the same indicated plasmids for 2 days, were infected with USSR H1N1 virus at 0.5 MOI for 24 h. Spun supernatants were used in focus forming assays on MDCK cells infected for 6 h and immunostained for viral NP positive cells (
[0293] Over-expression of each SOCE member in NPTr cells led to reduced USSR H1N1 virus output of which Orai2 (81%) and Orai3 (92%) conferred the most virus reduction (STIM1 gave 39% reduction and Orai1 37%) (
[0294] STIM-activating enhancer (STIMATE) and Ca.sup.2+ release activated channel regulator 2 A (CRACR2A) are positive regulators of SOCE. STIMATE encoded by TMEM110 is a multi-transmembrane ER protein that interacts with STIM1 (Jing et al., 2015; Quintana et al., 2015). CRACR2A is a Ca.sup.2+ sensor located in the cytoplasm that facilitates translocation and clustering with Orai1 and STIM1 to form a ternary complex (Lopez et al., 2016; Srikanth et al., 2010).
[0295] Accordingly, in still further experiments, NPTr cells, stably transfected with indicated plasmids to over-express CRAC2RA and STIMATE, were infected with USSR H1N1 at 0.5 MOI or pdm H1N1 virus at 1.0 MOI for 24 h. Spun supernatants were used to infect MDCK cells for 6 h in focus forming assays (
[0296] NPTr cells stably transfected with STIMATE or CRACR2A conferred substantially reduced progeny virus (66.7% and 73.3% USSR virus reduction respectively, and 42.31% and 76.9% pdm virus reduction respectively) (
[0297] These experiments confirm the role of SOCE in the antiviral activity exhibited by SOCE facilitators such as TG.
Example 10
[0298] This example describes further experiments conducted to probe the origin of TG's antiviral activity. Without being bound by theory, the inventors believe that the results in this example confirm that facilitation of SOCE function inhibits virus production, by showing that inhibition of SOCE function promoted virus production.
[0299] Further experiments were conducted to probe the original of TG's antiviral activity. NPTr cells were exposed to Orai inhibitors, 150 nM BTP2 and 5 μM Synta66 (
[0300] Exposure of NPTr cells to chemical inhibitors of CRAC entry channel, BTP2 and Synta66 (Han et al., 2015), for 30 min prior to infection conferred a small increase in progeny virus release (
Example 11
[0301] This example describes further experiments demonstrating the role of SOCE in inhibiting virus production.
[0302] Cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) is identified as a selective inhibitor of SERCA: inhibiting Ca.sup.2+ store refilling and enhancing Ca.sup.2+ entry into the cytosol (Uyama et al., 1993, Seidler et al., 1989). However, CPA is not efficient at SERCA inhibition hence relatively high concentrations are generally needed (Croisier et al., 2013).
[0303] NPTr cells were exposed to different concentrations of CPA for 30 min, rinsed three times with PBS, incubated for 24 h and followed by luminescent cell viability assay (Celltiter-Glo, Promega) (
Discussion of Examples 2 to 11
[0304] The inventors have shown for the first time that CRAC entry (via SOCE) is a potent innate immune defence against influenza A viruses. The inventors discovered that brief non-cytotoxic priming of a range of cell types, including primary NHBE cells, by SOCE facilitators such as TG strongly reduces virus production.
[0305] The inventors demonstrated that activated CRAC entry induced by SOCE facilitators in accordance with the invention is similarly effective at virus reduction whether it is activated before or during infection, and sustains resistance to infection for ≥24 h post-TG exposure.
[0306] The inventors further showed that virus disruption took place post-transcriptionally at the protein level, possibly affecting viral protein processing or assembly. The antiviral effects of SOCE facilitators such as TG thus appear sustained and rapid in onset. Without being bound by theory, the inventors consider that, mechanistically, SOCE facilitators such as TG seem to operate at several levels to target the inhibition of influenza virus production (
[0307] In this model, CRAC entry mediated by SOCE facilitators such as TG is accompanied by ER stress associated UPR (Krebs et al., 2015) that involves three major ER-transmembrane sensors: ATF6, PERK and IRE1. Upon activation, the precursor form of ATF6 translocates to the Golgi apparatus to be cleaved to release the active ATF6 p50 which is shuttled into the nucleus to transactivate UPR responsive genes, such as ER chaperons (Hassan et al., 2012; Lencer et al., 2015). Activated PERK phosphorylates eIF2α that results in the inhibition of global protein translation that includes the inhibition of influenza virus protein production (Landera-Bueno et al., 2017; Lencer et al., 2015). The activation of ATF6 and PERK can also lead to the activation of NF-κB and induction of cytokines (Janssens et al., 2014). Activated IRE1α, as a kinase as well as an endoribonuclease, appears to have a dual role as an ER stress sensor and a pathogen recognition receptor (PRR) of single stranded RNA generated by its own endoribonuclease action (Cho et al., 2013; Lencer et al., 2015). Activated IRE1α splices the XBP1 mRNA that results in XBP1 translation which in turn up-regulates the expression of ER chaperon and lipogenic genes. Misfolded proteins or microbial (bacterial) products may also activate IRE1α to generate single stranded RNA from host mRNA which induces RIG-I signalling that leads to NF-κB and IRF3 activation (Lencer et al., 2015). Furthermore, ER stress has been shown to recruit NOD1/2-TRAF2-RIPK2 complex to IRE1α leading to the activation of NF-κB that induces IL6 expression (Keestra-Gounder et al., 2016). NOD1 and NOD2 are traditionally regarded as cytosolic sensors of bacterial peptidoglycan fragments, but NOD2 can also function as a cytoplasmic viral PRR for viral ssRNA, including influenza A virus, by signalling through adaptor protein, MAVS adaptor, to trigger the activation of IRF3 and production of IFN-β (Sabbah et al., 2009). Therefore, activated IRE1α is a major site for the transduction of ER stress and innate immune signalling of RIG-I and NOD1/2.
[0308] In the experiments described above, the inventors showed that the CRAC entry-mediated inhibition of influenza virus production, triggered by brief non-toxic exposure to TG, appears to operate at several separate levels. Without being bound by theory, the inventors surmise that TG induced-ER stress would have an almost immediate effect in disrupting viral protein production/processing, and TG could have primed cells to subsequently mount a vigorous RIG-I-type I FN signalling response to influenza virus infection. Facilitation of SOCE alone (by over-expression of structural or positive regulatory SOCE members) was sufficient to induce a robust and seemingly IFN-independent antiviral state.
[0309] In probing the origin of the above effects, the inventors found that (a) TG-primed cells exhibited elevated type I IFN associated response to infection in a dose-related manner. Such an antiviral response would require de novo protein synthesis and may be a specific Ca.sup.2+ transduction effect of TG stimulation. The inventors also found that (b) the post-transcriptional inhibition of influenza virus was in part mediated by the induction of ER stress, as evidenced by the use of tunicamycin that did not affect Ca.sup.2+ influx but likely to have involved PERK activation that promptly inhibited viral protein production or processing (Landera-Bueno et al., 2017; Yan et al., 2002; Connor and Lyles, 2005). The inventors further found that (c) facilitation of SOCE alone (by over-expression of structural or positive regulatory SOCE members) was sufficient to induce a robust antiviral state. Over-expression of SOCE genes (structural and regulatory) did not appear to have any appreciable effect on ER stress. Conversely, knockdown of STIM1 and Orai1 (genetic inhibition of SOCE) promoted virus production, confirming the specificity of SOCE in the inhibition of influenza virus. Presently, it is not completely clear how Ca.sup.2+ influx via SOCE is transduced into post-transcriptional inhibition of influenza virus. The cross-talk between SOCE and the type I IFN associated response requires further investigation. The inventors found that TG primed cells elevated the expression of IFN associated genes in response to infection. Genetic inhibition of SOCE, conversely, attenuated expression of type I IFN related genes during infection. However, facilitation of SOCE by over-expression of SOCE members, whilst effective in the inhibition of virus production, had little effect on the expression of type I IFN associated genes in response to influenza virus infection. Without being bound by theory, the above indications are believed to support the role of SOCE facilitation in generating a robust antiviral response particularly against influenza viruses.
[0310] Without being bound by theory, the inventors believe that the magnitude and duration of SOCE triggered by SOCE facilitators such as TG are likely to be key in conferring host resistance to influenza virus. Induction of modest CRAC influx, as detected in Fluo-8 Ca.sup.2+ assays, may be all that is required to induce a potent antiviral state. Consistent with this thinking, facilitation of SOCE alone, by the over-expression of SOCE members, was shown to resist virus infection, presumably through small transient Ca.sup.2+ influx triggered during early infection. Furthermore, the lack of reduction in progeny virus following pre-treatment with CPA at doses that appear not to induce or facilitate Ca.sup.2+ influx is consistent with this view.
[0311] On its own, early influenza virus infection did not induce detectable extracellular Ca.sup.2+ entry in different cell types. By contrast, chronic surge in Ca.sup.2+ influx is damaging and can lead to apoptosis such as in rotavirus infection (Halasz et al., 2010; Hyser et al., 2013; Flourakis et al., 2010). Induction of extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx during late stages (≥24 h) of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus infection in duck embryonic fibroblasts was found to induce apoptosis thus facilitating virus propagation (Ueda et al., 2010). Furthermore, hemorrhagic fever viruses, at a late stage of virus replication, trigger SOCE which is necessary for virus budding (Han et al., 2015). TG-induced increase of cytosolic Ca.sup.2+ is primarily through extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx (May et al., 2014). Influenza virus appears particularly susceptible to transient activation of CRAC entry.
[0312] Tunicamycin as an ER stress inducer inhibits protein glycosylation and palmitoylation; it increases Ca.sup.2+ influx across the plasma membrane (via SOCE) (Czyz et al., 2009; Zhu-Mauldin et al., 2017) and, in part, by ER Ca.sup.2+ store depletion (Buckley and Whorton, 1997; Czyz et al., 2009; Deniaud et al., 2008). The non-toxic doses of tunicamycin used in the present study induced ER stress but without detectable extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx. Not surprisingly, influenza virus infection has been shown to induce ER stress (Roberson et al., 2012; Hrincius et al., 2015; Hassan et al., 2012). However, the inventors found that influenza virus infection also attenuated the ER stress response in cells primed with TG prior to infection. ER stress and influenza virus infection are known to transcriptionally activate P58IPK, an inhibitor of eIF2α kinases including PERK, PKR and GCN2, that reduces the phosphorylation of eIF2α thus, in a negative feedback, promoting protein translation and alleviating ER stress (Yan et al., 2002; Roobol et al., 2015).
[0313] At sufficiently high concentration, TG can be toxic to cells leading to apoptosis (Denmeade et al., 2003; Linford and Dorsa, 2002; Wang et al., 2014). Since it is often used to induce ER stress, through ER Ca.sup.2+ store depletion, it is no surprise that basic cellular functions, such as ATP production (indication of relative viability) and caspase activity (indication of apoptotic progression), can be adversely affected. In such studies, TG is typically applied at relatively high concentration (in μM range) (Tsalikis et al., 2016; Perry et al., 2012) and/or over an extended period (h to days) (Dombroski et al., 2010; Denmeade et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2014). However in virus experiments, the use of TG without proper monitoring of cell viability can complicate the interpretation of findings. Cells with compromised viability can appear morphologically normal but are less able to support full virus production. Therefore, it is necessary that in virus infections, where TG is included to induce ER stress or SOCE, the effect of cytotoxicity is ascertained. In our experiments, unlike some studies (Michelangeli et al., 1995; Fujioka et al., 2013) we explicitly applied TG in the non-toxic range for each cell type, such that it had no detectable cytotoxicity (based on luminescence ATP cell viability and caspase 3/7 assays). By contrast, previous reports of the effect of TG on viral replication have typically applied the TG at potentially cytotoxic levels and/or for extended duration (Michelangeli et al., 1995) such that any observed decrease in infectivity can be assigned to apoptosis and/or cytotoxicity, rather than inhibition of viral replication and/or infectivity. This is consistent with more recent reports which have shown that an increase in cytosolic Ca.sup.2+, e.g. mediated by the viral non-structural protein 4 (NSP4), is necessary for rotavirus replication (Hyser et al., 2013). To combat pathogenic influenza virus infection, it is strategically more effective to strengthen host resistance than to directly target the virus which can easily mutate to circumvent the antiviral drug. The identification of CRAC entry via SOCE as a potent innate immune defence against influenza virus infection and the exemplification of TG as an SOCE agonist have opened up the possibility of new therapeutics that target the SOCE pathway to blunt the severity and transmission of influenza virus infection.
Example 12
[0314] This example shows that other sesquiterpene lactones also have antiviral effects.
[0315] Like TG, artemisinin is a sesquiterpene lactone. The inventors conducted experiments to demonstrate that cells previously primed with artemisinin produced less progeny virus when infected with influenza virus.
[0316] NPTr cells, incubated with 0.1 μM and 1.0 μM artemisinin for 30 min were subsequently infected with USSR H1N1 or pandemic H1N1 virus at 0.5 MOI for 24 h. Spun supernatants were used to infect MDCK cells for 6 h in focus forming assays. Significance determined by one way ANOVA, comparing to corresponding DMSO control. Data are shown in
[0317] The inventors conducted further experiments to determine the effect of artemisinin on extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx. Fluo-8 fluorescence intensity was measured in NPTr cells, PTECs and porcine myoblasts pre-incubated with 1.0 μM artemisinin or TG at 0.5 μM, 0.1 μM and 0.5 μM respectively, for 10 min. Significance was determined by one way ANOVA, relative to the corresponding DMSO control. Results are shown in
Example 13
[0318] This example shows that still other sesquiterpenes and sesquiterpene lactones also have antiviral effects.
[0319] The inventors conducted experiments to compare the effect of various sesquiterpene compounds that show structural similarity to TG in reducing virus production. NPTr and NHBE cells were pre-treated with sesquiterpene compounds (valerenic acid (VA), (+)-ledene (LD), dehydroleucodine (DHL), artemisinin and TG) as indicated for 30 min, rinsed with PBS and infected with USSR H1N1 virus at 0.25 MOI and 0.5 MOI respectively for 24 h. Spun supernatants were used in focus forming assays based on the detection of viral NP in MDCK cells infected for 6 h (
[0320] The inventors conducted further experiments to determine the effect of the sesquiterpenes and sesquiterpene lactones on extracellular Ca.sup.2+ influx. Fluo-8 fluorescence intensity was measured in NPTr cells incubated with indicated sesquiterpenes at 2.5 μM or 10 μM for 15 min (
[0321] The inventors have presented compelling evidence that shows SOCE as a potent host innate immune defence against influenza virus infection.
[0322] Consistent with this, the inventors showed that the mere facilitation (via over-expression of structural or positive regulatory members of SOCE) or inhibition (via chemical inhibitors or knockdown of STIM1 by siRNA) of SOCE was sufficient to inhibit or promote virus production respectively. Over-expression of STIM1 and Orai isoforms in NPTr cells and myoblasts reduced virus output to a similar extent as the use of TG. Likewise, over-expression of SOCE activators (STIMATE and CRACR2A) in NPTr cells, myoblasts and NHBE cells significantly reduced progeny virus production. Conversely, brief chemical inhibition of Orai channel in NPTr cells, and STIM1 siRNA-knockdown in NHBE cells resulted in raised progeny virus production. Knockdown of STIM1 in NHBE cells reduced the inhibitory effect of TG in virus production, further linking the causal relationship between SOCE and virus inhibition.
[0323] A number of sesquiterpenes have been shown by the inventors to exhibit clear antiviral activity (e.g. TG, artemisinin, (+)-ledene and dehydroleucodine). Of these, TG is a SERCA inhibitor hence an activator of CRAC entry via SOCE. Without being bound by theory, the inventors surmise that (+)-ledene, dehydroleucodine and artemisinin also function as facilitators of SOCE upon infection in a manner akin to the antiviral effect seen in the over-expression of SOCE members.
Example 14
[0324] This example demonstrates that sesquiterpene lactones such as thapsigargin are highly selective.
[0325] The inventors conducted experiments to determine the selectivity index of TG in primary normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells and immortalised neonatal pig tracheal epithelial (NPTr) cells.
[0326] Cells were primed with a range of TG doses, including DMSO control, for 30 min, washed three times with PBS and following 24 h of incubation, cell viability assay was performed using a CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay kit (Promega). CC.sub.50 is the concentration of TG used that results in 50% reduction of viability compared with control cells. In a parallel experiment, cells similarly primed with different concentrations of TG were infected with USSR H1N1 virus at 1.0 MOI for NHBE cells or 0.5 MOI for NPTr cells (based on 6 h focus forming assays [ffa] to detect viral NP by immuno-staining) for 24 h and culture media harvested to determine the amount of progeny virus released by ffa detection. IC.sub.50 is the dose of TG used that results in 50% reduction of progeny virus in relation to virus output from control cells. Selectivity index (SI) is defined as the ratio CC.sub.50/IC.sub.50.
[0327] The selectivity index in each cell line was determined. The selectivity index in NHBE cells was 8572.89 (cellular cytotoxicity [CC.sub.50]=33.52 μM and USSR virus inhibitory concentration [IC.sub.50]=0.00391 μM). The selectivity index in NPTr cells was 7952.21 (CC.sub.50=56.58 μM and IC.sub.50=0.007115 μM). These high selectivity indices indicate a high margin of drug safety.
Example 15
[0328] This example demonstrates that sesquiterpene lactones such as thapsigargin are active against human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).
[0329] RSV is an enveloped, single negative-strand RNA virus of the Paramyxoviridae family. Human RSV is a major causative agent of respiratory tract infection in children worldwide for which there is still no vaccine available. The inventors conducted experiments to demonstrate that brief 30 min exposure of cells to a non-toxic dose of a sesquiterpene lactones such as thapsigargin is sufficient to effectively block RSV production whether administered before (
[0330] To demonstrate that TG priming of HEp2 cells at non-toxic doses blocks RSV production, HEp2 cells pre-incubated with indicated concentrations of TG or control DMSO for 30 min were rinsed with serum free media and immediately infected with RSV (A2 strain, ATCC VR-1540) at 0.1 MOI for 3 days. Spun supernatants were collected to infect HEp2 cells for 24 h for immuno-detection of RSV. TG doses used to prime HEp2 cells were non-toxic. 30 min TG treated cells were rinsed, cultured overnight and subjected to cell viability assays (CellTiter-Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability Assay kit, Promega. Results are shown in
[0331] To demonstrate that the TG-activated anti-RSV state in HEp2 cells lasts more than 48 h and is rapidly triggered during infection, HEp2 cells were pre-incubated with TG or control DMSO for 30 min, rinsed with serum free media and further cultured for 24 or 48 h in normal media followed by RSV infection at 0.1 MOI for 3 days. Spun supernatants from infected samples were collected to infect HEp2 cells for 24 h for immuno-detection of RSV. Results are shown in
[0332] In further experiments, HEp2 cells were first infected with RSV at 0.1 MOI for 24 or 48 h followed by priming with TG or DMSO control for 30 min. Fresh media were used to replace TG containing media of 24 h infected cells; and supernatants collected earlier from 48 h infected cells were used to replace TG containing media of 48 h infected cells. All samples were infected for total period 72 h. Spun supernatants were collected to infect HEp2 cells for 24 h for RSV immuno-detection. DMSO controls were based on combined control supernatants from 24 and 48 h time points. Results are shown in
[0333] As with influenza virus, TG priming has a sustained anti-viral effect on RSV of over 48 h (FIG. YA) and is rapidly effective in blocking virus production at 48 h post-infection (FIG. YB). The selectivity index of TG over a 3 d infection period in HEp-2 cells is similarly high at 1346.499 (CC.sub.50=90 μM and IC.sub.50=0.06684 μM).
REFERENCES
[0334] Buckley, B. J., and A. R. Whorton. 1997. Tunicamycin increases intracellular calcium levels in bovine aortic endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. 273:C1298-C1305.
[0335] Casciano, J. C., N. J. Duchemin, R. J. Lamontagne, L. F. Steel, and M. J. Bouchard. 2017. Hepatitis B virus modulates store-operated calcium entry to enhance viral replication in primary hepatocytes. Plos One 12:e0168328.
[0336] Cho, J. A., A. H. Lee, B. Platzer, B. C. S. Cross, B. M. Gardner, H. De Luca, P. Luong, H. P. Harding, L. H. Glimcher, P. Walter, E. Fiebiger, D. Ron, J. C. Kagan, and W. I. Lencer. 2013. The unfolded protein response element IRE1α senses bacterial proteins invading the ER to activate RIG-I and innate immune signaling. Cell Host Microbe 13:558-569.
[0337] Chong, A. K., M. S. Peggs, and M. von Itzstein. 1991. Influenza virus sialidase: effect of calcium on steady-state kinetic parameters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1077:65-71.
[0338] Connor, J. H., and D. S. Lyles. 2005. Inhibition of host and viral translation during vesicular stomatitis virus infection. J. Biol. Chem. 280:13512-13519.
[0339] Croisier, H., X. Tan, J. F. Perez-Zoghbi, M. J. Sanderson, J. Sneyd, and B. S. Brook. 2013. Activation of store-operated calcium entry in airway smooth muscle cells: insight from a mathematical model. Plos One 8:e69598.
[0340] Cui, R., Y. Wang, L. Wang, G. Li, K. Lan, R. Altmeyer and G. Zou, 2016. Cyclopiazonic acid, an inhibitor of calcium-dependent ATPases with antiviral activity against human respiratory syncytial virus. Antivir. Res. 132:38-45.
[0341] Czyz, A., W. Brutkowski, J. Fronk, J. Duszynski, and K. Zablocki. 2009. Tunicamycin desensitizes store-operated Ca.sup.2+ entry to ATP and mitochondrial potential. Biochem. Biophy. Res. Com. 381:176-180.
[0342] Dellis, O., A. Arbabian, B. Papp, M. Rowe, I. Joab, and C. Chomienne. 2011. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 increases calcium influx through store-operated channels in B lymphoid cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286:18583-18592.
[0343] Deniaud, A., O. Sharaf el dein, E. Maillier, D. Poncet, G. Kroemer, C. Lemaire, and C. Brenner. 2008. Endoplasmic reticulum stress induces calcium-dependent permeability transition, mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization and apoptosis. Oncogene 27:285-299.
[0344] Denmeade, S. R., C. M. Jakobsen, S. Janssen, S. R. Khan, E. S. Garrett, H. Lilja, S. B. Christensen, and J. T. Isaacs. 2003. Prostate-specific antigen-activated thapsigargin prodrug as targeted therapy for prostate cancer. J. Natl. Cancer 1. 95:990-1000.
[0345] Díaz, Y., F. Peña, O. C. Aristimuño, L. Matteo, M. D. Agrela, M. E. Chemello, F. Michelangeli, and M. C. Ruiz. 2012. Dissecting the Ca.sup.2+ entry pathways induced by rotavirus infection and NSP4-EGFP expression in Cos-7 cells. Virus Res. 167:285-296.
[0346] Dombroski, B. A., R. R. Nayak, K. G. Ewens, W. Ankener, V. G. Cheung, and R. S. Spielman. 2010. Gene expression and genetic variation in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress in human cells. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86:719-729.
[0347] Ferrari, M., A. Scalvini, M. N. Losio, A. Corradi, M. Soncini, E. Bignotti, E. Milanesi, P. Ajmone-Marsan, S. Barlati, D. Bellotti, and M. Tonelli. 2003. Establishment and characterization of two new pig cell lines for use in virological diagnostic laboratories. J. Virol. Methods 107:205-212.
[0348] Flourakis, M., V. Lehen'kyi, B. Beck, M. Raphaël, M. Vandenberghe, F. V. Abeele, M. Roudbaraki, G. Lepage, B. Mauroy, C. Romanin, R. Skryma, and N. Prevarskaya. 2010. Orai1 contributes to the establishment of an apoptosis-resistant phenotype in prostate cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 1:e75.
[0349] Fujioka, Y., M. Tsuda, A. Nanbo, T. Hattori, J. Sasaki, T. Sasaki, T. Miyazaki, and Y. Ohba. 2013. A Ca.sup.2+-dependent signalling circuit regulates influenza A virus internalization and infection. Nat. Commun. 4:2763.
[0350] Halasz, P., G. Holloway, and B. S. Coulson. 2010. Death mechanisms in epithelial cells following rotavirus infection, exposure to inactivated rotavirus or genome transfection. J. Gen. Virol. 91:2007-2018.
[0351] Han, Z., J. J. Madara, A. Herbert, L. I. Prugar, G. Ruthel, J. Lu, Y. Liu, W. Liu, X. Liu, J. E. Wrobel, A. B. Reitz, J. M. Dye, R. N. Harty, and B. D. Freedman. 2015. Calcium regulation of hemorrhagic fever virus budding: mechanistic implications for host-oriented therapeutic intervention. Plos Pathog. 11:e1005220.
[0352] Hassan, I. H., M. S. Zhang, L. S. Powers, J. Q. Shao, J. Baltrusaitis, D. T. Rutkowski, K. Legge, and M. M. Monick. 2012. Influenza A viral replication is blocked by inhibition of the inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) stress pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 287:4679-4689.
[0353] Hogan, P. G., and A. Rao. 2015. Store-operated calcium entry: mechanisms and modulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 460:40-49.
[0354] Hrincius, E. R., S. Liedmann, D. Finkelstein, P. Vogel, S. Gansebom, A. E. Samarasinghe, D. You, S. A. Cormier, and J. A. McCullers. 2015. Acute lung injury results from innate sensing of viruses by an ER stress pathway. Cell Rep. 11:1591-1603.
[0355] Hyser, J. M., B. Utama, S. E. Crawford, J. R. Broughman, and M. K. Estes. 2013. Activation of the endoplasmic reticulum calcium sensor STIM1 and store-operated calcium entry by rotavirus requires NSP4 viroporin. J. Virol. 87:13579-13588.
[0356] Janssens, S., B. Pulendran, and B. N. Lambrecht. 2014. Emerging functions of the unfolded protein response in immunity. Nat. Immunol. 15:910-919.
[0357] Jing, J., L. He, A. Sun, A. Quintana, Y. Ding, G. Ma, P. Tan, X. Liang, X. Zheng, L. Chen, X. Shi, S. L. Zhang, L. Zhong, Y. Huang, M. Q. Dong, C. L. Walker, P. G. Hogan, Y. Wang, and Y. Zhou. 2015. Proteomic mapping of ER-PM junctions identifies STIMATE as a regulator of Ca.sup.2+ influx. Nat. Cell Biol. 17:1339-1347.
[0358] Keestra-Gounder, A. M., M. X. Byndloss, N. Seyffert, B. M. Young, A. Chávez-Arroyo, A. Y. Tsai, S. A. Cevallos, M. G. Winter, O. H. Pham, C. R. Tiffany, M. F. de Jong, T. Kerrinnes, R. Ravindran, P. A. Luciw, S. J. McSorley, A. J. Bäumler, and R. M. Tsolis. 2016. NOD1 and NOD2 signalling links ER stress with inflammation. Nature 532:394-397.
[0359] Konig, R., S. Stertz, Y. Zhou, A. Inoue, H.-H. Hoffmann, S. Bhattacharyya, J. G. Alamares, D. M. Tscherne, M. B. Ortigoza, Y. Liang, Q. Gao, S. E. Andrews, S. Bandyopadhyay, P. De Jesus, B. P. Tu, L. Pache, C. Shih, A. Orth, G. Bonamy, L. Miraglia, T. Ideker, A. Garcia-Sastre, J. A. T. Young, P. Palese, M. L. Shaw, and S. K. Chanda. 2010. Human host factors required for influenza virus replication. Nature 463:813-817.
[0360] Krebs, J., L. B. Agellon, and M. Michalak. 2015. Ca.sup.2+ homeostasis and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress: An integrated view of calcium signaling. Biochem. Biophy. Res. Com. 460:114-121.
[0361] Kuchipudi, S. V., S. P. Dunham, R. Nelli, G. A. White, V. J. Coward, M. J. Slomka, I. H. Brown, and K. C. Chang. 2012. Rapid death of duck cells infected with influenza: a potential mechanism for host resistance to H5N1. Immunol. Cell Biol. 90:116-123.
[0362] Landera-Bueno, S., Y. Fernández, A. Falcón, J. C. Oliveros, and J. Ortín. 2017. Chemical genomics identifies the PERK-mediated unfolded protein stress response as a cellular target for influenza virus inhibition. mBio 7:e00085-16.
[0363] Lencer, W. I., H. DeLuca, M. J. Grey, and J. A. Cho. 2015. Innate immunity at mucosal surfaces: the IRE1-RIDD-RIG-I pathway. Trends Immunol. 36:401-409.
[0364] Linford, N. J., and D. M. Dorsa. 2002. 17b-estradiol and the phytoestrogen genistein attenuate neuronal apoptosis induced by the endoplasmic reticulum calcium-ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin. Steroids 67:1029-1040.
[0365] Lopez, J. J., L. Albarran, L. J. Gómez, T. Smani, G. M. Salido, and J. A. Rosado. 2016. Molecular modulators of store-operated calcium entry. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1853:2037-2043.
[0366] Lytton, J., M. Westlin, and M. R. Hanley. 1991. Thapsigargin inhibits the sarcoplasmic or endoplasmic reticulum Ca-ATPase family of calcium pumps. J. Biol. Chem. 266:17067-17071.
[0367] Marois, I., A. Cloutier, I. Meunier, H. M. Weingartl, A. M. Cantin, and M. V. Richter. 2014. Inhibition of influenza virus replication by targeting broad host cell pathways. Plos One 9:e110631.
[0368] May, V., T. A. Clason, T. R. Buttolph, B. M. Girard, and R. L. Parsons. 2014. Calcium influx, but not intracellular calcium release, supports PACAP-mediated ERK activation in HEK PAC1 receptor cells. J. Mol. Neurosci. 54:342-350.
[0369] McNab, F., K. Mayer-Barber, A. Sher, A. Wack, and A. O'Garra. 2015. Type I interferons in infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15:87-103.
[0370] Michelangeli, F., F. Liprandi, M. E. Chemello, M. Ciarlet, and M. C. Ruiz. 1995. Selective depletion of stored calcium by thapsigargin blocks rotavirus maturation but not the cytopathic effect. J. Virol. 69:3838-3847.
[0371] Oslowski, C. M., and F. Urano. 2011. Measuring ER stress and the unfolded protein response using mammalian tissue culture system. Methods Enzymol. 490:71-92.
[0372] Perry, J. W., M. Ahmed, K. O. Chang, N. J. Donato, H. D. Showalter, and C. E. Wobus. 2012. Antiviral activity of a small molecule deubiquitinase inhibitor occurs via induction of the unfolded protein response. Plos Pathog. 8:e1002783.
[0373] Quintana, A., V. Rajanikanth, S. Farber-Katz, A. Gudlur, C. Zhang, J. Jing, Y. Zhou, A. Rao, and P. G. Hogan. 2015. TMEM110 regulates the maintenance and remodeling of mammalian ER-plasma membrane junctions competent for STIM-Orai signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci U.S.A. 112:E7083-E7092.
[0374] Roberson, E. C., J. E. Tully, A. S. Guala, J. N. Reiss, K. E. Godburn, D. A. Pociask, J. F. Alcorn, D. W. H. Riches, O. Dienz, Y. M. W. Janssen-Heininger, and V. Anathy. 2012. Influenza induces endoplasmic reticulum stress, caspase-12-dependent apoptosis, and cJun N-terminal kinase-mediated transforming growth factor-b release in lung epithelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 46:573-581.
[0375] Roobol, A., J. Roobol, A. Bastide, J. R. P. Knight, A. E. Willis, and C. M. Smales. 2015. p58.sup.IPK is an inhibitor f the eIF2a kinase GCN2 and its localization and expression undepin protein synthesis and ER processing capacity. Biochem. J. 465:213-225.
[0376] Sabbah, A., T. H. Chang, R. Harnack, V. Frohlich, K. Tominaga, P. H. Dubei, Y. Xiang, and S. Bose. 2009. Activation of innate immune antiviral responses by Nod2. Nat. Immunol. 10:1073-1080.
[0377] Sacchetto, R., I. Bertipaglia, S. Giannetti, L. Cendron, F. Mascarello, E. Damiani, E. Carafoli, and G. Zanotti. 2012. Crystal structure of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca.sup.2+-ATPase (SERCA) from bovine muscle. J. Struct. Biol. 178:38-44.
[0378] Sebastian, S., L. Goulding, S. Kuchipudi, and K. C. Chang. 2015. Extended 2D myotube culture recapitulates postnatal fibre type plasticity. BMC Cell Biology 16:23.
[0379] Seidler, N. W., I. Jona, M. Vegh, and A. Martonosi. 1989. Cyclopiazonic acid is a specific inhibitor of the Ca.sup.2+-ATPase of sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 264:17816-17823.
[0380] Silva, A. M., D. Wang, A. A. Komar, B. A. Castilho, and B. R. G. Williams. 2007. Salicylates trigger protein synthesis inhibition in a protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase-dependent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 282:10164-10171.
[0381] Srikanth, S., H. J. Jung, K. D. Kim, P. Souda, J. Whitelegge, and Y. Gwack. 2010. A novel EF-hand protein, CRACR2A, is a cytosolic Ca.sup.2+ sensor that stabilizes CRAC channels in T cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 12:436-446.
[0382] Tsalikis, J., Q. Pan, I. Tattoli, C. Maisonneuve, B. J. Blencowe, D. J. Philpott, and S. E. Girardin. 2016. The transcriptional and splicing landscape of intestinal organoids undergoing nutrient starvation or endoplasmic reticulum stress. BMC Genomics 17:680.
[0383] Ueda, M., T. Daidoji, A. Du, C. S. Yang, M. S. Ibrahim, K. Ikuta, and T. Nakaya. 2010. Highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus induces extracellular calcium influx leading to apoptosis on avian cells. J. Virol. 84:3068-3078.
[0384] Uyama, Y., Y. Imaizumi, and M. Watanabe. 1993. Cyclopiazonic acid, an inhibitor of Ca.sup.2+-ATPase in sarcoplasmic reticulum, increases excitability in ileal smooth muscle. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 110:565-572.
[0385] Wang, H., X. Jia, C. Sui, Y. Zhao, Y. Mei, Y. Zheng, and Z. Zhang. 2014. Effects of thapsigargin on the proliferation and survival of human rheumatoid arthritis synovial cells. Sci. World J. 2014:605416.
[0386] Yan, W., C. L. Frank, M. J. Korth, B. L. Sopher, I. Novoa, D. Ron, and M. G. Katze. 2002. Control of PERK eIF2a kinase activity by the endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced molecular chaperon P58.sup.IPK. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:15920-15925.
[0387] Yang, B., and M. J. Bouchard. 2012. The hepatitis B virus X protein elevates cytosolic calcium signals by modulating mitochondrial calcium uptake. J. Virol. 86:313-327.
[0388] Zhou, Y., T. K. Frey, and J. J. Yang. 2009. Viral calciomics: interplays between Ca.sup.2+ and virus. Cell Calcium 46:1-17.
[0389] Zhu-Mauldin, X., S. A. Marsh, L. Zou, R. B. Marchase, and J. C. Chatham. 2017. Modification of STIM1 by O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) attenuates store-operated calcium entry in neonatal cardiomyocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 287:39094-39106.