ULTRA-LOW POWER MAGNETOELECTRIC MAGNETIC FIELD SENSOR

Abstract

A high-sensitivity and ultra-low power consumption magnetic sensor using a magnetoelectric (ME) composite comprising of magnetostrictive and piezoelectric layers. This sensor exploits the magnetically driven resonance shift of a free-standing magnetoelectric micro-beam resonator. Also disclosed is the related method for making the magnetic sensor.

Claims

1. An on-chip micro-resonator magnetic sensor, comprising: a doubly clamped magnetoelectric micro-beam resonator that generates a magnetically driven resonance shift; a piezoelectric layer; and a magnetostrictive layer; wherein the magnetostrictive layer is strain coupled to the piezoelectric layer to form a micro-beam for the on-chip micro-resonator magnetic sensor.

2. The magnetic sensor of claim 1, wherein the piezoelectric layer comprises AlN, PMN-PT, BTO, or any combination thereof.

3. The magnetic sensor of claim 1, wherein the magnetostrictive layer comprises, Fe, Co, Ni, FeCo, FeCoV, FeGa, or any combination thereof.

4. The magnetic sensor of claim 1, wherein the magnetic sensor has a sensitivity 10.sup.10 Tesla/Hz.sup.1/2 or less.

5. The magnetic sensor of claim 1, wherein the magnetic sensor has a power dissipation of less than 10 mW.

6. The magnetic sensor of claim 1, wherein the magnetic sensor has a power dissipation of about 0.1 mW.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0013] FIG. 1A is a microscope image of patterned microbeam heterostructures before substrate release. FIG. 1B is a schematic showing active layers and electrical contacts in a microbeam sensor.

[0014] FIG. 2 shows the frequency shift of a magnetostrictive microbeam resonator when placed in a magnetic field (from Kiser et al., Applied Physics Letters, 104 (7) 072408. (2014)).

[0015] FIG. 3 is a schematic of the silicon nitride scaffold fabrication process.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0016] The present invention provides a passive, integrated MEMS based ME magnetic resonator as a magnetic sensor. Enhanced ME sensor performance is achieved through the use of a structural resonance MEMS approach combined with low-power modulation (mechanical or electric) techniques using the non-linear regime of the sensor to reduce the influence of background magnetic and vibrational noise. Resonant operation also allows for signal processing at frequencies above the 1/f crossover for additional noise reduction (allowing for detection of DC and low-frequency near −DC magnetic fields). Noise reduction strategies make use of resonant frequency and low-cost wafer-scale batch fabrication of micro-nanoscale devices combined with ensemble averaging.

[0017] This invention realizes the first on-chip micro-resonator magnetic sensor with micron and sub-micron dimensionality (FIGS. 1A and 1B). The micro-beam is a bilayer thin film heterostructure of a magnetostrictive layer (Fe, Co, Ni, FeCo, FeCoV, FeGa . . . ) strain couple to a piezoelectric layer (AlN, PMN-PT, BTO . . . ). The magnetostrictive layer changes length under an applied magnetic field which alters the resonance frequency of the device. The heterostructure that makes up the micro-beam consists of an active magnetostrictive layer, which is strain coupled to a sensing piezoelectric layer, both grown atop a thin lattice matched metal seed layer (enabling high quality crystalline epitaxy and a conducting rear electrode). During operation the structure is excited to resonance using a low power piezoelectric crystal (PZT, PMN-PT . . . ) or directly by the AlN piezoelectric layer.

[0018] When exposed to a magnetic field the active magnetostrictive layer responds causing a considerable resonance shift as a function of a magnetic field intensity. This approach has previously been demonstrated in clamped-clamped ME bimorphs with Metglas and FeNi (Finkel et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 092905 (2011)) as well as in ME cantilevers, where the shift in frequency f is related to the delta-E effect (Gojdka et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 223502 (2011)).

[0019] Double-clamped stress-reconfigurable ME resonators can sense near DC magnetic field by determining the magnetic field induced shift in the resonant frequency resulting from a change in stress owing to magnetostriction (Kiser et al., Applied Physics Letters, 104 (7) 072408. (2014) and Staruch et al., Applied Physics Letters, 107 (3) 032909. (2015)).

[0020] The theoretical limit of detection of the proposed stress-reconfigurable sensor can be much improved compared to a one end fixed cantilever design (which has been developed but at much larger scales (Jahns et al., US Patent Application 20130289913)) due to higher Q (lower losses) and larger sensitivity proportional to frequency shift (df/dH) and reduced equivalent magnetic noise due to operation at higher resonance frequency and better resonant ME coupling and at the induced voltage. This resonance is sensed by the piezoelectric under-layer, which converts the planar strain to a voltage signal.

[0021] By sending the output of the piezoelectric layer to external circuitry, such as amplitude modulation or a phase locked loop, very low frequency magnetic fields can be detected at frequencies much less than the resonant frequency of the device.

[0022] The heterostructure is patterned into a microbeam using a series of patterning steps coupling with thin film deposition, ion milling and wet etching. The beams are then released by removing the silicon substrate using a high temperature KOH etch.

[0023] The invention also includes fabrication methods necessary to overcome extra-high internal materials stresses under sub-micron geometries which cause device self-destruction. To prevent such stresses from breaking the micro-beam, a fabrication procedure was developed using a 16 step process. Notable method inventions include epitaxial film growth optimization, a KOH patterned back etch using SiN as an etch stop, suspended reactive ion etching to avoid device contact and vertical processing baths to prevent hydraulic bending and stiction.

[0024] In one embodiment, a fabrication process is based upon building highly stressed multi-layered films on a removable silicon nitride scaffold, the silicon nitride can be partially or completely removed to form free standing double clamped cantilevers. Access to the silicon nitride is gained by back side etching completely through the silicon host wafer by KOH etching which has high selectivity between silicon and silicon nitride. A dry RIE such as a CF.sub.4 plasma, or other suable RIE technique is used to remove the silicon nitride scaffold from the back side. The fabrication process also includes initiation layers of the magnetostrictive film and the piezoelectric film utilizing a metallic buffer layer to establish an initial crystalline structure or adhesion layer conducive to achieving good magnetostrictive and piezoelectric quality thin films. The fabrication process includes the steps described below.

[0025] Fabrication Process utilizing Silicon Nitride Scaffold may include a number or all of the following steps (FIG. 3): [0026] 1. Deposit low-stress thermal silicon nitride (0-100 MPa tensile stress) on both sides of uniform double side polish Si wafers. The low-stress thermal silicon nitride can be low-stress low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) silicon nitride, low-stress chemical vapor deposition (CVD) silicon nitride, low-stress plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) silicon nitride, or low-stress atomic layer deposition (ALD) silicon nitride. [0027] 2. Deposit a contact layer serving as a seed layer (e.g., Pt, Hf, Ta, or any combination thereof) on top side of wafer (serves as an initiation layer for the piezoelectric film and as a back side electrode). [0028] 3. Deposit/Sputter Al N or other piezoelectric layer at high temperature (450° C. or higher, preferably between 450 and 550° C.). [0029] 4. Pattern photoresist/lift-off layer to define beam geometry. [0030] 5. Sputter metallic buffer layer for initiation/adhesion layer. [0031] 6. Sputter FeCo or other magnetostrictive film optimized for magnetostrictive property and stress. This process may be completed at elevated temperatures to perform a post-deposition anneal without breaking vacuum. [0032] 7. Lift off magnetostrictive film utilizing wet chemistry. [0033] 8. Photoresist process for piezoelectric layer etch to access under lying contact layer (Pt in this case). [0034] 9. Chemical Etch AlN or other piezo-layer to define first electrode. [0035] 10. Photoresist process for top side second electrode. [0036] 11. Electrode Metallization (thermal, ebeam or sputtering). [0037] 12. Chemical lift off process for first electrode definition. [0038] 13. Perform photoresist patterning of expanded openings back side aligned to the multi-layer beams. [0039] 14. RIE etch openings in the back side silicon nitride exposing Si windows. [0040] 15. Form a smaller opening at the front side of the wafer, centered under the beams. This can be done with a KOH etch on the back side—etch follows crystalline angles. Alternatively, windows can be opened from the top with a CF.sub.4 plasma. [0041] 16. Back side RIE of the silicon nitride scaffold to release the multi-layer beams.
A second Fabrication process utilizes top side release of the beam by opening windows in the underlying Pt layer exposing the silicon and isotropically etching the silicon utilizing XeF.sub.2 sufficient to etch completely under the multi-layer film beams.

[0042] This ME integrated resonant sensor devices with on-chip silicon-based electronics to provide signal processing and communications functions in a compact module of micron-scale as integrated ME sensor elements with low power consumption and integrated tuning and readout mechanisms. Specialized low noise electronics can be developed for demonstrating equivalent magnetic noise reduction at resonance utilizing modulation (mechanical and/or magnetic) techniques.

[0043] The above descriptions are those of the preferred embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings without departing from the spirit and broader aspects of the invention. It is therefore to be understood that the claimed invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. Any references to claim elements in the singular, for example, using the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” or “said,” is not to be construed as limiting the element to the singular.