Method for heat-treating metal materials

Abstract

A method for heat treating metal materials by passing electrical current through a metallic workpiece to heat the workpiece via Joule heating to a preselected temperature for a preselected period of time, based upon the formula I.sup.2×R×t, wherein I is current, R is resistance and t is time. The current may be a direct or an alternating one. Various configurations of the method are envisioned wherein multiple current inputs and outputs are attached to the metal material so as to selectively heat specific portions of the piece including irregular shapes and differing diameters.

Claims

1. A method for electrically heat treating an aluminum 319 alloy workpiece comprising the step of: pulsing electrical current directly through the workpiece using at least one current input to heat the workpiece via resistive heating to a temperature less than 450 degrees C. for no more than 1 hour, then aging the piece to produce a hardened material having a harness of at least 50 on the RB scale.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the current is direct current.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the current is alternating current.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the electrical heating is done in a specialty gas atmosphere.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the specialty gas atmosphere is an inert gas atmosphere.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein the specialty gas atmosphere is an oxidizing atmosphere.

7. The method of claim 4 wherein the specialty gas atmosphere includes a mixture of gases including at least one gas selected from the group consisting of methane, ammonia, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, and cyanide.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the current cycles at differing magnitudes.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the metallic work piece is quenched in place while still connected to the electrical supply then re-heated by electrical current to a preselected temperature for subsequent treatment.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the work piece has a nonuniform three dimensional shape including a circular geometry.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 shows a schematic of the electrical heating setup in one example

(2) FIGS. 2(a) and 2(b) show the X-ray diffraction spectra of AZ91E samples

(3) FIG. 3 shows the hardness of Al 319 alloy as a function of different solution heat-treatments that were all followed by water quenching and aging.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(4) The following description includes various modes and examples of the present disclosure. It will be clear from this description of the disclosure that the disclosure is not limited to these illustrated embodiments but that the disclosure also includes a variety of modifications and embodiments thereto. Therefore the present description should be seen as illustrative and not limiting. While the disclosure is susceptible of various modifications and alternative constructions, it should be understood, that there is no intention to limit the disclosure to the specific form disclosed, but, on the contrary, the disclosure is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined in the claims.

(5) The present disclosure provides examples of heat treating a metal by passing electrical current through metallic materials (such as Al, Mg, etc.) to heat them for the desired temperature-time profile provides various desired attributes while limiting non-desired consequences. Passing a current “I” through a metal material of electrical resistance “R” heats the material by electrical Joule heating which is calculated as I.sup.2×R×t. To pass the current, one location of the sample is connected to the one terminal of the electrical power supply while another location on the sample is connected to the other terminal of the power supply. This example is different from induction heating where the current is induced in the material without the material being physically connected to a power supply.

(6) The output current from the power supply can be DC (direct current) or AC (alternating current) and is passed through the piece and is heated by the principles of Joule heating. In a DC arrangement the polarity of the terminals does not change during operation i.e. the positive terminal stays positive while the negative terminal stays negative. On the other hand, in an AC arrangement, the polarity of the terminals alternates between positive and negative. In addition, the current can be pulsed i.e. it is turned on for a given duration of time, and then turned off for a given duration of time. Such on-off cycles can continue for as long as needed. During pulsing a DC current, the polarity of the terminals can stay fixed for all the pulses, or the polarity can be reversed in some pulses.

(7) This methodology differs from others primarily because multiple current inlets/outlets can be switched back and forth to control temperature on a non-uniform geometry object for the purpose of generating a desired thermal distribution in the object. Thus, in one instance during heat-treatment, the current may be flowing through one current path within the workpiece resulting in a particular amount of Joule heating and heat distribution, while in the next instance, the current may be flowing through a different path within the workpiece resulting in a different amount of Joule heating and heat distribution compared to the first instance. In one set of embodiments electrical current pulse widths are significantly longer (>=1000 microseconds) than other practices and applications. In another set of embodiments, the current is not pulsed. In another set of embodiments, the current can be DC or AC.

(8) FIGS. 1-3 show various embodiments and examples of the present invention. Beginning first with FIG. 1, FIG. 1 shows an exemplary schematic of the electrical heating setup. The arrows show the current path, (2) through the cables and the electrodes (4, 4′), with a test sample 10 held between the electrodes (4, 4′). In one application, passing electrical current through metallic materials (such as Al, Mg, etc.) to heat them for the desired temperature-time profile provides various desired attributes while limiting non-desired consequences such as plastic deformation. Thus, in a simple example, one location of the sample (10) is operatively connected to the positive terminal (6) of the power supply while another location on the sample is connected to the negative terminal (8) of the power supply. This is distinct from induction heating where the current is induced in the material without the material being physically connected to a power supply (5).

(9) This invention differs from others in a variety of ways including enabling the operation of targeted heat processing by using multiple current inlets/outlets that can be switched back and forth to control temperature on a non-uniform geometry object for the purpose of generating a desired thermal distribution in the object. Thus, in one instance during heat-treatment, the current may be flowing through one current path within the workpiece resulting in a particular amount of Joule heating and heat distribution, while in the next instance, the current may be flowing through a different path within the workpiece resulting in a different amount of Joule heating and heat distribution compared to the first instance.

(10) In one set of experiments, pulsed electrical currents were used to heat the material and accelerate microstructural changes and/or produce better mechanical properties and/or lower the temperature needed to achieve microstructural changes than temperature that are required in conventional heating processes. In one set of experiments a ˜25.4 mm long×10 mm diameter cylindrical sample was machined out of a commercial AZ91E casting by electro-discharge machining (EDM). A pulsed DC (direct current) was passed through the sample to heat it via Joule heating with the goal of dissolving the β-Mg.sub.17Al.sub.12 precipitates that were present in the as-received casting. Starting from a sample at a nominal room-temperature of 25 C, the sample was heated gradually so as to reach the desired temperature in a few minutes. The pulse parameters were such that the current was ON for 1 milliseconds and OFF for 2 milliseconds. This pulse cycle implies a duty cycle (i.e. ON time in a cycle divided by ON+OFF time in a cycle) of 33.3%. The peak current amplitude was in the range of 200-500 Amperes and was controlled to maintain a temperature of approximately 335-345 degrees C. in the center of the specimen for 10 minutes. At the end of 10 minutes, the sample was quenched in water at room-temperature. A duty cycle of 33.3% implies that even though the sample was held at a temperature of 335-345 C for 10 minutes, the current was actually flowing through it for only 33.3% of the test duration (10 minutes), i.e. 200 seconds i.e. 3 minutes and 20 seconds.

(11) Initial results with Mg and Al cast samples have shown that passing the electrical current through the Mg or Al cast sample to be more effective than the traditional method of heating the same material in an oven/furnace. In case of Mg AZ91 alloy, this invention was ˜3-times more effective in producing the desired microstructural change (i.e. dissolving Mg17Al12 precipitates) than oven/furnace heating to the same temperature-time was. In case of Al 319 alloy, this invention was able to produce significantly higher hardness than by traditional method of heating the sample in an oven/furnace.

(12) Often, objects to be heat-treated are irregular or complex in shape with differing cross-sections and section lengths. The current flowing through a material is inversely proportion to its electrical resistance for a given applied voltage. Further, the electrical resistance is directly proportional to the length and inversely proportional to cross-sectional area. Thus, in an object with different cross-sections, its local electrical resistance will vary depending upon the location. In addition, current may travel through different paths within the object. Thus, sending current through an object with different possible current paths and each path with its own electrical resistance, may lead to non-uniform heating. Therefore, another embodiment of the invention is contemplated wherein the object to be heated can have multiple current inputs and multiple current outputs. Thus, current may be input/output using any combination of electrical connections so as to generate the desired thermal profile in the object. Such control can allow different sections to be heated to different temperatures optimized for that section whereas in conventional furnace/oven, the entire object is typically held at a given fixed temperature.

(13) In an industrial setting, the present methodology could revolutionize the heat-treating process through energy, time and cost savings as well as performing heat-treatments that were not feasible before (e.g. T6 heat-treatment on HPDC castings). Examples of such effects are shown for example in FIGS. 2 and 3.

(14) Referring first to FIG. 2, FIGS. 2(a) and 2(b) show X-ray diffraction spectra of AZ91E samples in the as-cast condition, after heating in the oven at 335 C for 10 minutes, and after Joule heating to 335-345 C for 10 minutes by passing pulsed DC current. The peaks of interest are indicated by arrows labeled as “β” i.e. the Mg.sub.17Al.sub.12 phase. FIG. 3 shows the hardness of Al 319 alloy as a function of different solution heat-treatments that were all followed by water quenching and aging. This figure shows hardness of samples that were solution heated in a furnace compared to hardness of samples that were electrically solution heated.

(15) A 10 mm diameter sample was EDM machined from the original AZ91E casting and heated in an oven at approximately 335 C for 10 minutes followed by water quenching. For comparison purposes, another 10 mm diameter sample was EDM machined from the original AZ91E casting and Joule heated at approximately 335-345 C for 10 minutes followed by water quenching. The goal in both of these samples was to dissolve β-Mg.sub.17Al.sub.12 precipitates that were initially present in the starting AZ91E alloy casting. The volume fraction of Mg.sub.17Al.sub.12 precipitates was determined by analyzing the β peak heights in the x-ray diffraction spectrum in the starting as-cast AZ91E alloy and after heating AZ91E samples by the two types of heat-treatments (see FIGS. 2a and 2b). The x-ray diffraction data showed that the volume fraction of Mg.sub.17Al.sub.12 in the starting AZ91E alloy was ˜11-13%, after oven heat-treatment followed by water quenching AZ91E alloy the Mg.sub.17Al.sub.12 volume fraction was 6-7% and after pulse-electrical heating followed by water quenching AZ91E the Mg.sub.17Al.sub.12 volume fraction was 0.5-2%. Thus, the pulsed electrical heating was able to dissolve almost 3× greater Mg.sub.17Al.sub.12 than oven heating when the respective samples were solution heated for the same temperature and time.

(16) In another example, we've performed electrical heating of an Al 319 casting alloy and compared it to conventional furnace heating of the same alloy—the respective samples were heated (called, solutionizing treatment) to 400 C for 60 minutes, followed by quenching in water at room-temperature. Starting from a sample at a nominal room-temperature of 25 C, the sample was heated gradually so as to reach the solution temperature in a few minutes. Following quenching, both samples (electrical solution heated sample and the furnace solution heated sample) were heated again (called, aging heat-treatment) in a furnace at 195 C for 5 hours followed by quenching in water at room-temperature. The goal of the solutionizing treatment+quenching+aging was to increase the hardness of the material through the mechanism commonly known in the field of metallurgy as precipitation aging. In the electrically solution heated samples, two types of electrical heating parameters were used: Sample I—the current passing through the sample was pulsed and in each cycle, the current was ON for 9 ms and OFF for 1 ms, resulting in a duty cycle of 90%. The peak current amplitude was in the range of 200-300 Amperes to maintain the sample at a solutionizing temperature of approximately 400 C.

(17) In Sample II, the current was not pulsed and instead, a non-pulsing DC current (i.e. duty cycle of 100%) in the range of 200-300 Amperes was passed through the sample to maintain it at a solutionizing temperature of approximately 400 C. For both samples, an inert gas was flown around the samples. Immediately following electrical solution heating, both samples were quenched in water at room-temperature. They were then aged in a furnace at 195 C for 5 hours followed by water quenching at room-temperature. The average hardness of the starting as-cast Al A319 alloy was measured to be approximately 45 Rockwell B. The average hardness of Sample I, i.e. pulsed-electrical solution heated sample, followed by aging was 64.5 Rockwell B. The average hardness of Sample II, i.e. non-pulsing DC solution heated sample, followed by aging was 67 Rockwell B. The average hardness of the furnace solution heated sample, followed by aging, was 11.6 Rockwell B.

(18) Thus, the electrical solution heating method (followed by aging), under both pulsing and non-pulsing conditions, was able to increase the hardness of the starting alloy whereas conventional furnace heating of the starting alloy lowered the hardness. Further, conventionally, this alloy is typically solutionized in furnace at 495 C for up to 8 hours, followed by aging at 195 C for 5 hours to get a high average hardness of 73 Rockwell B. The 64.5 Rockwell B hardness (Sample I, solution heated by pulsed current) and 67 Rockwell B hardness (Sample II, solution heated by non-pulsing DC current), obtained in the above electrical heating experiments with solution heating at 400 C for 1 hour suggests that it is possible to achieve hardness similar to 73 Rockwell B by electrical heating at temperatures below 495 C and for time shorter than 8 hours. FIG. 3 summarizes and compares the hardness of samples as a function of heating method (furnace vs. electrical) as well as after solution heated to different temperatures followed by water quenching and aging.

(19) These results demonstrate that Joule heating of metal parts can provide particular advantages to hardening and otherwise treating metal materials. It can, for example, allow for the heat treatment of castings without producing residual stresses that can cause distortion in the casting. It can provide an energy efficient method (e.g. lower temperature and/or shorter time) to heat-treat metallic alloys to reduce energy consumption and costs. Lower temperature and/or shorter time enabled by Joule heating can help in avoiding the blister formation in HPDC and allow HPDC castings to be strengthened beyond that achievable by T5 heat-treatment. By controlling current path and the resulting Joule heat distribution, Joule heating can also compensate for the variability in the initial microstructure in different sections of a casting. In other words, Joule heating can produce the desired properties in those different sections by tailoring the local temperature suitable for the local microstructure without having to over-engineer it. Finally, the described methods can be performed at lower temperature can reduce the potential for residual stresses and subsequent distortion.

(20) Additional objects, advantages and novel features of the present invention are described herein and will become further readily apparent to those skilled in this art from the following detailed description. In the preceding and following descriptions we have shown and described only the preferred embodiment of the invention, by way of illustration of the best mode contemplated for carrying out the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modification in various respects without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description of the preferred embodiment set forth herein are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.