HEAT-NOT-BURN TOBACCO MATRIX FOR PREVENTING CUT TOBACCO FROM FALLING AND APPLICATION THEREOF
20210161197 ยท 2021-06-03
Assignee
Inventors
- Ruifeng ZHAO (Guangdong, CN)
- Feng Li (Guangdong, CN)
- Jing HU (Guangdong, CN)
- Xi LIU (Guangdong, CN)
- Yibo LIU (Guangdong, CN)
- Zhijing LU (Guangdong, CN)
- Jing SHAN (Guangdong, CN)
Cpc classification
A24D1/20
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
The present invention provides a heat-not-burn tobacco matrix for preventing cut tobacco from falling and an application thereof. The tobacco matrix is formed by disorderly mixing expanded cut tobacco, formula leaf group cut tobacco and/or a tobacco sheet and then rolling, and a density of the tobacco matrix is 0.25 g/cm.sup.3 to 0.70 g/cm.sup.3.
Claims
1. A heat-not-burn tobacco matrix for preventing cut tobacco from falling, wherein the tobacco matrix is formed by disorderly mixing an expanded tobacco, a formula leaf group cut tobacco and/or a tobacco sheet and then rolling, and a density of the tobacco matrix is 0.25 g/cm.sup.3 to 0.70 g/cm.sup.3.
2. The heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 1, wherein a moisture mass percentage of the tobacco matrix is 5.0% to 12.5%.
3. The heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 2, wherein a moisture mass percentage of at least one constituent of the tobacco matrix is 5.0% to 11.0%.
4. The heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 1, wherein a mass of the expanded tobacco is 5% to 40% of a total mass of the tobacco matrix.
5. The heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 4, wherein a filling value of the expanded tobacco is 4.5 cm.sup.3/g to 7.5 cm.sup.3/g, and a whole cut rate of the expanded cut tobacco is 70% to 90%.
6. The heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 5, wherein a size of the expanded tobacco is greater than or equal to 1.0 mm.
7. The heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 6, wherein the expanded tobacco is an expanded cut tobacco and/or an expanded cut stem.
8. The heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 1, wherein a mass of the formula leaf group cut tobacco is 0% to 95% of a total mass of the tobacco matrix.
9. The heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 1, wherein a mass of the tobacco sheet is 0% to 95% of a total mass of the tobacco matrix.
10. The heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 9, wherein a size of the tobacco sheet is 0.1 mm to 0.3 mm in thickness, 2 mm to 30 mm in length, and 1 mm to 2 mm in width.
11. The heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 1, wherein a tobacco extract, an atomizing agent and an aroma component are loaded on the formula leaf group cut tobacco and/or the tobacco sheet and/or the expanded tobacco.
12. A heat-not-burn cigarette, comprising the heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 1.
13. An application method of the heat-not-burn cigarette according to claim 12, comprising the following steps: inserting the heat-not-burn cigarette into a heating element for fixed heating, sucking, rotating for at least 30 degrees after sucking, and pulling out the heat-not-burn cigarette.
14. A heat-not-burn cigarette, comprising the heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 2.
15. A heat-not-burn cigarette, comprising the heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 3.
16. A heat-not-burn cigarette, comprising the heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 4.
17. A heat-not-burn cigarette, comprising the heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 5.
18. A heat-not-burn cigarette, comprising the heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 6.
19. A heat-not-burn cigarette, comprising the heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 7.
20. A heat-not-burn cigarette, comprising the heat-not-burn tobacco matrix according to claim 8.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
[0043] The present invention will be further described below with reference to the specific embodiments, but the embodiments are not intended to limit the present invention in any form. Unless otherwise indicated, the reagents, methods, and devices employed in the present invention are routine reagents, methods, and devices in the art.
[0044] The reagents and materials used in the present invention are commercially available unless otherwise stated.
Embodiment 1
[0045] A heat-not-burn tobacco matrix for preventing cut tobacco from falling, wherein the tobacco matrix was formed by disorderly mixing expanded tobacco, formula leaf group cut tobacco and/or tobacco sheet and then rolling, a density of the tobacco matrix was 0.25 g/cm.sup.3, and a moisture content of the tobacco matrix was 10.5%.
Embodiment 2
[0046] A heat-not-burn tobacco matrix for preventing cut tobacco from falling, wherein the tobacco matrix was formed by disorderly mixing expanded tobacco, formula leaf group cut tobacco and/or tobacco sheet and then rolling, a density of the tobacco matrix was 0.65 g/cm.sup.3, and a moisture content of the tobacco matrix was 9.5%.
Embodiments 3 to 9
[0047] A heat-not-burn tobacco matrix for preventing cut tobacco from falling, wherein the tobacco matrix was formed by disorderly mixing expanded tobacco, formula leaf group cut tobacco and/or tobacco sheet and then rolling, a density of the tobacco matrix was 0.45 g/cm.sup.3, a moisture content of the tobacco matrix was 8%, a mass of the tobacco sheet was 50% of a total mass of the tobacco matrix, and a size of the expanded tobacco was greater than or equal to 1.0 mm.
[0048] See Table 1 for specific parameters of the tobacco sheet and the expanded cut tobacco.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Expanded cut tobacco Tobacco sheet Whole Filling cut Mass Thick- Serial value rate fraction ness Length Width number (cm.sup.3/g) (%) (%) Category (mm) (mm) (mm) Embodi- 7.12 83 15 Expanded 0.1 2 1 ment cut 3 tobacco Embodi- 7.12 85 30 Expanded 0.3 15 2 ment cut 4 tobacco Embodi- 4.88 87 15 Expanded 0.1 2 1 ment cut 5 stem Embodi- 4.88 87 30 Expanded 0.3 15 2 ment cut 6 stem Embodi- 6.21 70 15 Ordinary 0.1 2 1 ment cut 7 tobacco Embodi- 6.07 75 30 Ordinary 0.3 15 2 ment cut 8 tobacco Embodi- 7.12 80 20 Expanded 0.2 20 1.5 ment cut 9 tobacco Embodi- 4.88 87 5 Expanded 0.1 2 1 ment cut 10 stem Embodi- 4.88 87 40 Expanded 0.1 2 1 ment cut 11 stem
[0049] Result Detection
[0050] 400 tobacco matrixes mentioned above were prepared, and a sucking experiment was carried out with the cooperation of a heater.
[0051] A specific sucking experiment was as follows:
[0052] (1) inserting the heat-not-burn cigarette into the heating cavity through the cigarette insertion opening and contacting with the positioning piece;
[0053] (2) pressing a power switch to start heating, so that the heat of the heating element heated the heat-not-burn tobacco matrix for people to suck; and
[0054] (3) rotating for at least 30 degrees after sucking, and pulling out the heat-not-burn cigarette.
[0055] A fall-out rate of the cut tobacco after heating and sucking was evaluated, wherein a score of 5 referred to that no cut tobacco fell out basically; a score of 4 referred to that a small amount of cut tobacco fell out; a score of 3 referred to that part of the cut tobacco fell out obviously; a score of 2 referred to a large number of cut tobacco fell out; and a score of 1 referred to that all the cut tobacco fell out basically.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Serial Evaluation of fall-out Sensory number of cut tobacco evaluation Embodiment 1 4.5 8 Embodiment 2 5 8 Embodiment 3 5 9 Embodiment 4 5 9.5 Embodiment 5 5 9 Embodiment 6 4 8.5 Embodiment 7 4 8 Embodiment 8 4 8.5 Embodiment 9 4 8 Embodiment 10 4.5 8 Embodiment 11 4 8
[0056] A method in ISO standard 6565:2002 was used to measure the sucking resistance. It should be noted that, when testing the sucking resistance, measurement results of cigarettes inserted into the heating cavity of the heater are as shown in Table 3.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Serial Sucking number resistance (kPa) Embodiment 1 0.251 Embodiment 2 0.445 Embodiment 3 0.321 Embodiment 4 0.283 Embodiment 5 0.246 Embodiment 6 0.346 Embodiment 7 0.575 Embodiment 8 0.484 Embodiment 9 0.535 Embodiment 10 0.433 Embodiment 11 0.258
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
[0057] A heat-not-burn tobacco matrix was formed by rolling tobacco sheet, wherein the tobacco sheet were the same as those in Embodiment 1, with a thickness of 0.1 mm, a length of 2 mm and a width of 1 mm. A score of a fall-out rate of the cut tobacco after sucking was 4, and a sucking resistance was 0.935 kPa.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2
[0058] A heat-not-burn tobacco matrix was formed by disorderly mixing tobacco sheet and expanded cut tobacco and then rolling, wherein the tobacco sheet were the same as those in Embodiment 1, with a thickness of 0.1 mm, a length of 2 mm and a width of 1 mm. A fill-rate of the expanded cut tobacco was 7.12 cm.sup.3/g, a whole cut rate of the expanded cut tobacco was 83%, and a mass fraction of the expanded cut tobacco was 5%. A score of a fall-out rate of the cut tobacco after sucking was 3, and a sucking resistance was 0.845 kPa.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3
[0059] A heat-not-burn tobacco matrix was formed by disorderly mixing tobacco sheet and expanded cut tobacco and then rolling, wherein the tobacco sheet were the same as those in Embodiment 1, with a thickness of 0.1 mm, a length of 2 mm and a width of 1 mm. A fill-rate of the expanded cut tobacco was 7.12 cm.sup.3/g, a whole cut rate of the expanded cut tobacco was 83%, and a mass fraction of the expanded cut tobacco was 50%. A score of a fall-out rate of the cut tobacco after heating and sucking was 5, and a sucking resistance was 0.445 kPa, but the heat-not-burn tobacco matrix had a very poor sucking taste and bland aroma.
[0060] From the foregoing embodiments and comparative examples, it can be seen that the tobacco matrix formed by rolling the tobacco sheet without the expanded cut tobacco in Comparative Example 1 is easy to fall out after heating and sucking, which is obviously inferior to the embodiments; the content of the expanded cut tobacco added in Comparative Example 2 is too low, and the phenomenon of the cut tobacco falling out after heating and sucking of the obtained tobacco matrix is also obvious, which is not as good as that of the embodiments; and the addition amount of the expanded cut tobacco in Comparative Example 3 is too large, which can control the fall-out rate of the cut tobacco well, but excessive addition of the expanded cut tobacco will damage overall aroma and overall sensory evaluation of the tobacco matrix.
[0061] Obviously, the above-mentioned embodiments of the present invention are merely examples for clearly illustrating the present invention, but are not intended to limit the implementations of the present invention. For those of ordinary skills in the art, other different forms of changes or variations can be made on the basis of the above description. It is not necessary or possible to exhaust all the implementations here. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, and improvements made within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall all fall within the scope of protection claimed by the present invention.