Funicular arched steel truss falsework
11028603 · 2021-06-08
Assignee
Inventors
- Ahmed Yehia Abdel Aziz El-Sayed (Cairo, EG)
- Mohamed Darwish (Giza, EG)
- Khaled Nassar (Mohandesseen, EG)
Cpc classification
E04G1/34
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E04C2003/0491
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E04G11/36
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
International classification
Abstract
A scaffold having an opposing pair of half funicular trusses that are detachably or pivotably connected in the middle to establish a funicular arched truss is provided, where when in a detached or pivoted state, storage and transporting a plurality of the half funicular trusses is simplified.
Claims
1. A method of making a support structure, comprising detachably or pivotably connecting in opposition, at least one pair of half funicular arched trusses, wherein each said half funicular arched truss comprises: a) an exterior vertical member comprising a footing at a bottom end and a structure mount at a top end; b) a bottom chord member comprising a bottom end of said bottom chord member connected proximal to said exterior vertical member bottom end and a top end of said bottom chord member connected to a bottom port of a four-point intermediate connector, wherein said intermediate connector comprises said bottom port connected to a bottom portion of a connector housing and an outer port, a center port, and an inner port connected to a top portion of said connector housing; c) a diagonal member comprising a diagonal member bottom end connected to said inner port and a diagonal member top end connected proximal to said exterior vertical member top end; d) an interior vertical member comprising an interior vertical bottom end connected to said center port and an interior vertical member top end connected to a second said structure mount; e) a second bottom chord comprising a second bottom chord bottom end connected to said outer port and a second bottom chord top end connected to a bottom port of a second said four-point intermediate connector; f) a second diagonal member comprising a second diagonal member bottom end connected to an outer port of said second four-point intermediate connector and a second diagonal member top end connect proximal to said interior vertical member top end; g) a second said interior vertical member comprising a second interior vertical bottom end connected to a center port of said second four-point intermediate connector and a second interior vertical top end connected to a third said structure mount; h) a third bottom chord comprising a third bottom chord bottom end connected to an outer port of said second four-point intermediate connector and a third bottom chord top end connected to a bottom port of a third said four-point intermediated connector; i) a third diagonal member comprising a third diagonal member bottom end connected to an inner port of a third four-point intermediate connector and a third diagonal member top end connected proximal to said second interior vertical top end; j) a third said interior vertical member comprising a third interior vertical member bottom end connected to a center port of said third four-point intermediated connector and an interior vertical member top end connected to a fourth said structure mount; k) a fourth said bottom chord comprising a fourth bottom chord bottom end connected to an inner port of said third four-point intermediate connector and a fourth bottom chord top end connected to a truss joiner; and l) a horizontal member connected to said truss joiner and connected proximal to said third interior vertical member top end and connected proximal to said second interior vertical member top end and connected proximal to first interior top end and connected proximal to said exterior vertical top end; wherein one said half funicular arched truss detachably or pivotably connects to another said half funicular arched truss by detachably or fixedly connecting each said truss half funicular arched truss to a truss joiner in opposition to form a funicular truss scaffold, wherein said truss joiner is a solid plate or a hinged plate, wherein when in a detached or pivoted state storage and transporting a plurality of said half funicular arched trusses is simplified.
2. The method according to claim 1 further comprising a horizontal tie rod comprising a first end connected proximal to said bottom end of a first said exterior vertical member of a first said half funicular arched truss and a second end connected proximal to said bottom end of at least one other said exterior vertical member of at least one other said half funicular arched truss.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein each said vertical member, diagonal member, bottom chord, and horizontal member comprise a hollow tube.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein said ports and said housing four-point intermediated connector comprise hollow tubes.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein said bottom chords, said diagonal members, said interior vertical members and said four-point intermediate connectors comprise a truss member set, where the truss member set are assembled in a number that is scalable according to an intended height and span in an application.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein a plurality of said funicular truss scaffolds are connected in parallel.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(7) Commercially available systems currently used in construction require high initial cost, take time to be erected and reduce the space in the construction site for the movement of material, equipment and labor as they prevent movement underneath them. The current invention provides a new false-work system derived from the funicular arch; funicular arched steel truss (FAST) system. In one embodiment, the invention decreases the cost of the false-work, where less material is required for the structure and therefore needs lower initial cost than systems currently known in the art. Further, the new system is environmentally friendly as it achieves a range between 45% and 50% savings in the amount of CO.sub.2 emitted to air due to the use of less material. The savings in the material used in the FAST system ranges between 45% to 51% depending on the covered area and it also provides more space in the construction site for the materials, equipment and workers to move underneath the system. The system also decreases the time needed for erection by range between 67% and 80% depending on the area and consequently helps in saving time and cost.
(8) A closed form solution is provided with members designed mainly to withstand buckling as they are all under compression. As shown in
(9) Furthermore, the current embodiment includes the upper horizontal chords, the diagonals and the bracing members having an outer diameter of 16 mm, which is the minimum limit for these zero members. In this example embodiment, all of these steel tubes have 1.25 mm thickness. Table 1 summarizes the diameters of all the members in half of the symmetric truss. Its numbering system is as follows: the connection between the upper chord members are given the odd number from (1, 3, 5, 7 and 9) and the connections of the bottom chord members are given the even numbers (2, 4, 6, and 8), however, they meet with the upper chord members in the intermediate hinged which has the number 9.
(10) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Designed member dimensions per half truss. Member Member Length Diameter Name Number (mm) (mm) Exterior Vertical (EV) EV (1-2) 3000 25.4 mm Stringer (Upper chord) S 272.5 16 mm Interior Vertical (IV) IV (3-4) 1700 25.4 mm IV (5-6) 700 25.4 mm IV (7-8) 200 16 mm Bottom Chord (BC) BC (2-4) 1225 31.75 mm BC (4-6) 975 25.4 mm BC (6-8) 575 19 mm BC (8-9) 325 16 mm Diagonals (D) D (1-4) 1650 16 mm D (3-6) 750 16 mm D (5-8) 275 16 mm Scissors (SC) SC (34-34) 1220 16 mm SC (56-56) 900 16 mm
(11) In order to add structural redundancy to the system, a tie rod with an outer diameter of 19 mm is added to the system in order to withstand the thrusting force that tries to open the arch once it is subjected to high loads instead of depending on the friction with the ground to take the horizontal reactions. Further, it allows the setup of the truss to be easily assembled on site since it holds the two halves together, fixes the span at the desired length since it reduces the risk of the arch to open; and reduces the sway of the truss.
(12) In
(13) As shown in
(14) Turning again to
(15) It is understood that the number of intermediate connectors 122 and that associated connecting members used in a funicular arched truss structure 100 can vary according to the height and span of the overall system.
(16)
(17)
(18) The present invention has now been described in accordance with several exemplary embodiments, which are intended to be illustrative in all aspects, rather than restrictive. Thus, the present invention is capable of many variations in detailed implementation, which may be derived from the description contained herein by a person of ordinary skill in the art.
(19) The variations of the spans of the designed system have been studied in order to compare the savings in weight that it entails when compared to its commercially available counterparts. Table 2 shows the weights of the commercially available steel formwork systems and compares them to the weight of the designed system. It is clear that the weight of the commercially available system increases significantly in wide spans, however, the weight of the system is increases slightly for the spans from 2.4 meters up to 7.2 meters. This is because the lengths of the bottom chord members and the length of the diagonals increase with the increase in the span. Further, the increase in the diameter of the exterior vertical and bottom chord member (4-6) causes increase in the weight in spans of 6 and 7.2 meters. It was found that, originally, the FAST system has a 33% saving in the weight when the span is 2.4 meters. This means that, according to the previous assumption of the number of frames is used to compare the weight and the number of units in the two systems, that there is a saving of 4.89 kg/m2. This is calculated by dividing the weight of the eight units of the commercially available systems (63.65 kg) used to cover the area of 2.4×1.8 m (4.32 m2) to get the value of the weight of this system needed for each m2 from the floor area which yields a value of 14.73 kg/m.sup.2. While the weight needed from the proposed system to cover the same area is calculated by dividing the weight of one unit of the system (42.5 kg) by the area (4.32 m.sup.2) which yields a value of 9.84 kg/m.sup.2. The difference between these numbers gives the savings in the weight of the systems per unit area.
(20) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Effect of changing the arched truss span on the cost savings Weight of Weight Percentage Commercially of of available Proposed reduction Steel System in Span System (kg) (kg) weight 2.4 63.65 42.5 33% 3.6 95.46 46.6 51% 4.8 127.28 49.1 61% 6 159.1 54.25 66% 7.2 190.92 57.5 70%
(21) All such variations are considered to be within the scope and spirit of the present invention as defined by the following claims and their legal equivalents.