COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS RELATED TO INNATE RESPONSE TO DNA AND REGULATION OF INTERFERON-BETA
20210164992 · 2021-06-03
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
Provided are methods of modulating the type I interferon (IFN) pathway in an individual. The methods involve administering to an individual one or more agents that inhibit expression or function of METTL3, or METTL14, or ALKBH5, thereby modulating the type I IFN pathway. The agent that inhibits the expression and/or function ALKBH5 results in decreased interferon β cytokine production and/or decreased IFNB1 mRNA, and is useful for treating autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. The agent that inhibits expression or function of METTL3 and/or METTL14 result in increased IPNβ cytokine production and/or increased IFNB 1 mRNA, and is useful for treating infections and cancer. Methods for screening and identifying enzyme inhibitors are also provided.
Claims
1. A method of modulating the type I interferon (IFN) pathway in an individual, the method comprising administering to an individual in need thereof one or more agents that inhibit expression or function of METTL3, or METTL14, or ALKBH5, thereby modulating the type I IFN pathway.
2. The method of claim 1, comprising administering to the individual an agent that inhibits the expression and/or function of the ALKBH5, wherein administering the agent results in decreased interferon beta (IFNβ) cytokine production and/or decreased IFNB1 mRNA in cells of the individual, relative to a control IFNβ cytokine production or IFNB1 mRNA value, respectively, from cells to which the agent has not been administered.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the individual has been diagnosed with an autoimmune disease or inflammatory disease, and wherein the severity of the autoimmune disease or the inflammatory disease is reduced.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the individual has been diagnosed with the autoimmune disease.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the autoimmune diseases is positively correlated with the presence of cytoplasmic doubled stranded (dsDNA) in cells of the individual.
6. The method of claim 3, wherein the individual has been diagnosed with the inflammatory disease.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the inflammatory disease is correlated with the presence of cytoplasmic dsDNA.
8. The method of claim 1, comprising administering to the individual one or more agents that inhibit the expression or function of METTL3 or METTL14, wherein administering the one or more agents results in increased IFNβ cytokine production and/or increased IFNB1 mRNA in cells of the individual, relative to a control IFNβ cytokine production or IFNB1 mRNA value, respectively, from cells to which the agent has not been administered, thereby modulating the type I IFN pathway.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the individual has been diagnosed with or is suspected of having cancer, or an infection caused by an intracellular parasite, and wherein the severity of the cancer or the infection is reduced.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the cancer, or the infection caused by the intracellular parasite, is correlated with the presence of cytoplasmic doubled stranded (dsDNA) in cells of the individual.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the individual has the infection, and wherein the infection is by a DNA virus.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the dsDNA from the DNA virus is present in cytoplasm of cells of the individual.
13. The method of claim 10, wherein the individual has been diagnosed with the cancer.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the cancer comprises cancer cells that have cytoplasmic dsDNA.
15. A method for identifying whether or not a test agent affects the function of METTL3/14 and/or ALKBH5, the method comprising: i) providing a plurality of eukaryotic cells that can express the IFNB1 gene and produce the cytokine interferon beta (IFNβ); ii) introducing the test agent into the cells; and iii) determining whether or not there is a change in the amount of IFNβ cytokine production and/or IFNB1 mRNA in the cells subsequent to ii), wherein detecting the change indicates the test agent may inhibit the function of METTL3/14 and/or ALKBH5.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein a decrease in the amount of IFNβ cytokine production and/or I IFNB1 mRNA indicates the agent may inhibit the function of the ALKBH5.
17. The method of claim 16, further comprising testing the agent in control cells with inhibited or reduced ALKBH5 expression, wherein a lack of a decrease in the amount of IFNβ cytokine production and/or IFNB1 mRNA by the control cells indicates the agent inhibits the function of the ALKBH5.
18. The method of claim 16, wherein an increase in the amount of IFNβ cytokine production and/or IFNB1 mRNA indicates the agent may inhibit the function of the METTL3/14.
19. The method of claim 18, further comprising testing the agent in control cells with inhibited or reduced METTL3/14 expression, wherein a lack of an increase in the amount of IFNβ cytokine production and/or IFNB1 mRNA by the control cells indicates the agent inhibits the function of the METTL3/14.
20. The method of claim 15, wherein the plurality of eukaryotic cells comprise cytoplasmic dsDNA.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0035] Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used in this disclosure have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains.
[0036] Every numerical range given throughout this specification includes its upper and lower values, as well as every narrower numerical range that falls within it, as if such narrower numerical ranges were all expressly written herein.
[0037] The disclosure includes all polynucleotide sequences described herein, their complementary sequences, DNA equivalents of RNA and vice versa, all polynucleotide sequences that encode any protein described herein, and all amino acid sequences referred to herein.
[0038] Any polynucleotide and amino acid sequences that are described by way to a database entry are incorporated herein as they exist in the database on the effective filing date of this application or patent.
[0039] The present disclosure relates in part to cellular functions required for m.sup.6A RNA modification in response to the intracellular sensing or detection of dsDNA, as described further below.
[0040] In embodiments, the disclosure comprises modulating expression and/or function of one or more enzymes described herein. In an embodiment, the disclosure comprises modulating expression and/or function of ALKBH5 demethylase. In certain embodiments, expression and/or function of ALKBH5 demethylase is inhibited. Inhibition of ALKBH5 may be selective or specific. In embodiments, ALKBH5 is inhibited concurrently with one or both of YTHDF1 and YTHDF2.
[0041] In embodiments, the disclosure comprises modulating expression and/or function of m.sup.6A methylase subunit METTL3, or METTL14, or both METTL3 AND METTL14. In embodiments, expression and/or function of METTL14 is modulated. Inhibition of these enzymes may also be selective or specific. Thus, specifically or selectively modulating expression of any subunit of m.sup.6A methyltransferase is encompassed by this disclosure.
[0042] While aspects of this disclosure are illustrated using cells that comprise cytoplasmic dsDNA, determination that dsDNA is present is an optional aspect of the disclosure. Further, the disclosure includes treating disorders that are not necessarily positively correlated with the presence of cytoplasmic dsDNA. Nevertheless, if desired, the disclosure includes treating conditions that are associated with cytoplasmic DNA responses, including but not necessarily limited to self-responses to cytoplasmic dsDNA, including but not necessarily limited to cytoplasmic DNA that is involved in cytoplasmic dsDNA signaling. If desired, the presence of cytoplasmic dsDNA can be determined by from a biological sample obtained from an individual, or may be inferred based on a diagnosis of, for example, certain microbial and viral infections, and/or autoimmune disorders, inflammatory diseases, or cancer. Further, cytoplasmic dsDNA may originate from mitochondria, and it is also known that mitochondrial stress itself may trigger a type I interferon response. Addressing conditions related to type I interferon responses that are induced by mitochondrial DNA are therefore encompassed by this disclosure. Cytoplasmic dsDNA may also originate from the nucleus as cells age and undergo senescence.
[0043] The amino acid sequence of, and nucleotide sequence encoding, human ALKBH5 are known (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_017758.4). The amino acid sequence of, and nucleotide sequence encoding, human METTL3 are known (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_019852.5). Likewise, the amino acid sequence of, and the nucleotide sequence encoding, human METTL14 are known (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_020961.4). The disclosure includes all of these sequences, all and splice variants and isoforms of the proteins.
[0044] In embodiments, modifying the function and/or expression of an enzyme described herein (e.g., ALKBH5, METTL3 and METTL14) comprises decreasing expression of the enzyme, or inhibiting one or more functions of the enzyme.
[0045] In embodiments, expression of an enzyme described herein is inhibited. Inhibition of expression of an enzyme (or any other protein) can be achieved using methods known in the art. In embodiments, expression is inhibited by inhibiting translation of mRNA encoding the protein. In embodiments, the mRNA encoding the protein is degraded. In this regard, in non-limiting embodiments, RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated silencing and/or reducing mRNA encoding an enzyme described herein is performed. In embodiments, this is achieved by delivery of any suitable RNAi agent. In embodiments, an siRNA-based approach is used. This can be performed by introducing and/or expressing one or more suitable short hairpin RNAs (shRNA) in the cells. shRNA is an RNA molecule that contains a sense strand, antisense strand, and a short loop sequence between the sense and antisense fragments. shRNA is exported into the cytoplasm where it is processed by dicer into short interfering RNA (siRNA). siRNA are 21-23 nucleotide double-stranded RNA molecules that are recognized by the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Once incorporated into RISC, siRNA facilitate cleavage and degradation of targeted mRNA. Thus, for use in RNAi mediated silencing or downregulation of ALKBH5 expression as described herein, siRNA, shRNA, or miRNA can be used. In alternative embodiments, a functional RNA, such as a ribozyme is used. In embodiments, the ribozyme comprises a hammerhead ribozyme, a hairpin ribozyme, or a Hepatitis Delta Virus ribozyme. In related embodiments, a microRNA (miRNA) adapted to target the relevant mRNA can be used.
[0046] In alternative embodiments, one or more small molecule inhibitors of ALKBH5, METTL3 and METTL14 can be used in methods of this disclosure. In connection this, the present disclosure includes a proof of principle demonstrating that ALKBH5 function can be inhibited by a small molecule. To show this, a small molecule inhibitor of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases (a class of enzymes that includes ALKBH5), is shown to reduce IFNB1 mRNA accumulation in response to exposing primary human fibroblasts to ds DNA, which, as described herein, is a known inducer of type I interferon and inflammatory responses. This demonstration was performed using a compound referred to in the art as Rhein, which has the following structure:
##STR00001##
[0047] Results from testing this compound are provided in
[0048] Determining inhibition of ALKBH5, and thus identifying compounds for use in ALKBH5 inhibition, can be performed, given the benefit of this disclosure, by determining whether or not a compound inhibits activation of the type I IFN pathway. Additionally or alternatively, determining inhibition of ALKBH5 can be assessed by determining a reduction in dsDNA-induced IFNB1 mRNA accumulation. In embodiments, IFNB1 mRNA accumulation can be induced in test cells, such as by treating cells to provoke formation of cytoplasmic dsDNA, or introducing cytoplasmic dsDNA, including but not limited to infection by a DNA virus, or using cells that have known cytoplasmic dsDNA to establish a value for IFNB1 mRNA. Inhibition can therefore be identified by determining a value for IFNB1 mRNA that is lower than an established control value. Such tests could be determined, for example, in a high-throughput screening approach using in vitro cell cultures. Changes in secretion of IFNB1 can also be measured in such tests. The same approach can be adapted for identifying inhibitors of METTL3 and METTL14, but in this approach an increase in IFNB1 is indicative of enzymatic inhibition. Further, methylation patterns of m.sup.6A mRNA can be analyzed to identify agents that modulate the activity of ALKBH5, or METTL3/14. Further still, inhibiting expression of ALKBH5 or METTL3/14 impacts expression of numerous genes, as further described herein, and in the accompanying figures. Expression of one or any of these genes can also be measured to assess whether or not compound effect the function of these enzymes. Thus, in embodiments, it is expected that some or all cellular genes regulated together with IFNB1 mRNA described in the Figures would likewise be impacted by interfering with METTL3/14 or ALKBH5 expression. In further embodiments, test compounds could be assessed to determine their effects on senescence-associated characteristics that are associated with the function of any enzyme described herein.
[0049] In embodiments, the disclosure relates to inhibitors of ALKBH5, or inhibition of its expression, to treat autoimmune diseases, or inflammatory diseases, or a combination thereof. Thus, the disclosure facilitates reducing expression if IFNB1 in individuals in need of treatment for such conditions. In embodiments, the individual has been diagnosed with or is suspected of having an autoimmune disease, which can include but is not necessarily limited to systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic inflammation, and any of a number of interferonopathies, such as such as Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. In connection with these utilities for the present disclosure, it is known in the art that self-DNA can be causative of autoimmune diseases. (See, for example, Gao et al., Activation of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase by self-DNA causes autoimmune disease, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015 Oct. 20; 112(42):E5699-705, and Vincent et al., Small molecule inhibition of cGAS reduces interferon expression in primary macrophages from autoimmune mice, Nature Communications, 8: 750, DOI: 10.10381s41467-017-00833-9, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference). Further, Type I IFN is implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus and interferonopathies. (See, for example, An, et al. Expression of Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, Vol. 69, No. 4, April 2017, pp 800-807, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference). Additional and non-limiting examples of specific disorders include celiac disease, Crohn's disease, diabetes mellitus type 1, autoimmune encephalitis, eosinophilic fasciitis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, eosinophilic esophagitis, multiple sclerosis (MS), including but not limited to Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS), Secondary-Progressive MS (SPIVS), Primary-Progressive MS (PPMS), and Progressive-Relapsing MS (PRMS), or gastritis, Graves' disease, hypogammaglobulinemia, idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases, thrombocytopenic purpura, myasthenia gravis, pernicious anemia, psoriasis, Sjögren's syndrome, and ulcerative colitis, graft versus host disease (GVHD). In further embodiments, an individual treated with an ALKBH5 inhibitor or suppressor may have any disorder that is characterized by type II, III or IV hypersensitivity.
[0050] In embodiments, treatment of an individual with an agent that reduces expression and/or inhibits ALKBH5 function can be combined with an immune modulator. For example, an immunosuppressant agent may be used. In embodiments, the immunosuppressive agent may comprises an mTOR inhibitor, such as rapamycin, or a rapolog. In embodiments, the immunosuppressant comprises a calcineurin inhibitor, such as tacrolimus or cyclosporine, or a corticosteroid, such as cortisone prednisolone, prednisone, and triamcinolone.
[0051] In other embodiments, an individual is treated with an agent that reduces expression and/or inhibits the function of METTL3, or METTL14, or both, to thereby produce an increase in IFNB1 mRNA and/or IFNβ cytokine. In embodiments, the individual has a DNA virus or microbial infection. In embodiments, an approach of this disclosure is therefore suitable for treating an individual who is infected with a Poxvirus, a Herpesvirus, a Hepatitis virus, an Adenovirus, a Polyomavirus, or a Papillomavirus. In embodiments, an approach of this disclosure for treating a viral infection can be combined with treatment of the individual with any suitable anti-viral drug, examples of which include but are not necessarily limited to Acyclovir, Ganciclovir, Valganciclovir, Valacyclovir, Idoxuridine, Trifulodine, Vidar, Famciclovir, Penciclovir, Boceprevir, Ledipasvir, Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, Simeprevir and Telaprevir.
[0052] In embodiments, an individual is treated with an agent that reduces expression and/or inhibits the function of METTL3 and METTL14 to thereby produce an increase in IFNB1 mRNA and/or IFNβ cytokine, when the individual has a microbial infection, such by as a non-viral intracellular pathogenic microbe. In embodiments, the intracellular microbial pathogen is a bacteria, or a fungus. In embodiments, the bacterial infection is caused by an obligate intracellular parasite (e.g., any member of Chlamydophila, Ehrlichia, Rickettsia). Additionally, certain pathogenic types of Salmonella, Neisseria, Brucella, Mycobacterium, Nocardia, Listeria, Francisella, Legionella, and Yersinia pesti may be present in intracellular infections, and treating such infections is also encompassed by this disclosure. In embodiments, an individual who is immunocompromised for any reason is treated with an agent that reduces expression and/or inhibits the function of METTL3 and METTL14. In embodiments, the immunocompromised individual does not produce IFN, or produced less than a suitable amount of IFN.
[0053] In embodiments, the individual has a fungal infection. Without intending to be constrained by any particular theory, it is considered that fungal DNA may be present in cytoplasm of human cells, under certain conditions, but this is not believed to essential for implementing a method of the disclosure. In embodiments, the fungal infection is by any member of Candida, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Histoplasma, Pneumocystis, or Stachybotrys.
[0054] Treatment of bacteria or fungal infections according to this disclosure can be combined with any suitable antibacterial or antifungal agents. In embodiments, suitable antibiotics include but are not limited to members of classes such as aminoglycosides, beta lactams (with or without beta lactamase inhibitor such as clavulanic acid), macrolides, glycopeptides, polypeptides, cephalosporins, lincosamides, ketolides, rifampicin, polyketides, carbapenem, pleuromutilin, quinolones, streptogranins, oxazolidinones, lipopeptides, etc. In embodiments, anti-fungal agents include but are not limited to flucytosine, imidazoles, polyenes, triazoles, griseofulvin, ciclopirox, terbinafine, and caspofungin.
[0055] In embodiments, an individual is treated with an agent that reduces expression and/or inhibits the function of METTL3 and METTL14 to thereby produce an increase in IFNB1 mRNA and IFNβ cytokine, wherein the individual has cancer. In embodiments, the individual has been diagnosed with any type of cancer. In embodiments, the cancer is a solid or liquid tumor. In embodiments, the cancer is renal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, liver cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, colon cancer, esophageal cancer, stomach cancer, bladder cancer, brain cancer, testicular cancer, head and neck cancer, melanoma or another skin cancer, any sarcoma, including but not limited to fibrosarcoma, angiosarcoma, adenocarcinoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma, and any blood cancer, including all types of leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma.
[0056] In embodiments, treatment with an enzyme inhibitor described herein is combined with a chemotherapeutic agent, including but not necessarily limited to an immune checkpoint inhibitor. In embodiments, the checkpoint inhibitors comprise an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor, or an anti-Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) checkpoint inhibitor. There are numerous such checkpoint inhibitors known in the art. For example, anti-PD-1 agents include Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab. An anti-PD-L1 example is Avelumab. An anti-CTLA-4 example is Ipilimumab.
[0057] In embodiments, an agent of this disclosure, such as agents used to inhibit the expression and/or function of ALKBH5, METTL3, or METTL14, is administered in a therapeutically effective amount. For any such agent, the therapeutically effective amount, e.g., a dose, can be estimated initially either in cell culture assays or in animal models. An animal model can also be used to determine a suitable concentration range, and route of administration. Such information can then be used to determine useful doses and routes for administration in humans. A precise dosage can be selected by the individual physician in view of the patient to be treated. Dosage and administration can be adjusted to provide sufficient levels of the active moiety or to maintain the desired effect. Additional factors which may be taken into account include the severity and type of the disease state, age, weight and gender of the patient, desired duration of treatment, method of administration, time and frequency of administration, drug combination(s), reaction sensitivities, and tolerance/response to therapy. A therapeutically effective amount is an amount that reduces one or more signs or symptoms of a disease, and/or reduces the severity of the disease. A therapeutically effective amount may also inhibit or prevent the onset of a disease, or a disease relapse.
[0058] In embodiments, an enzyme inhibitor used in methods of this disclosure is administered to a patient in a sufficient quantity to achieve a peak plasma concentration in a therapeutic target range. In embodiments, an enzyme inhibitor is used to achieve a plasma concentration of between 0.1 nM and 1 μM, inclusive, and including all numbers there between to the first decimal point. These or other plasma concentrations can for an individual agent or patient can be determined by pharmacodynamics studies that will be apparent to those skilled in the art, given the benefit of the present disclosure.
[0059] Administration of compositions comprising agents that modulate the expression and/or function of the enzymes as described herein can be carried out using any suitable route of administration known in the art. For example, the compositions may be administered via intravenous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intracerobrospinal, subcutaneous, intra-articular, intrasynovial, oral, topical, or inhalation routes, depending on the particular condition being treated. The compositions may be administered parenterally or enterically. The compositions may be introduced as a single administration or as multiple administrations or may be introduced in a continuous manner over a period of time. For example, the administration(s) can be a pre-specified number of administrations or daily, weekly or monthly administrations, which may be continuous or intermittent, as may be therapeutically indicated.
[0060] Enzyme inhibitors or other suitable agents for use in embodiments of the present disclosure can be provided in pharmaceutical compositions by combining them with any suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, excipients and/or stabilizers. Examples of pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, excipients and stabilizer can be found in Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy (2005) 21st Edition, Philadelphia, Pa. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. For example, suitable carriers include excipients, or stabilizers which are nontoxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed, and include buffers such as acetate, Tris, phosphate, citrate, and other organic acids; antioxidants including ascorbic acid and methionine; preservatives such as octadecyldimethylbenzyl ammonium chloride; hexamethonium chloride; benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride; phenol, butyl or benzyl alcohol; alkyl parabens such as methyl or propyl paraben; catechol; resorcinol; cyclohexanol; 3-pentanol; and m-cresol; amino acids such as glycine, glutamine, asparagine, histidine, arginine, or lysine; monosaccharides, disaccharides, and other carbohydrates including glucose, mannose, or dextrins; chelating agents such as EDTA; tonicifiers such as trehalose and sodium chloride; sugars such as sucrose, mannitol, trehalose or sorbitol; surfactant such as polysorbate; salt-forming counter-ions such as sodium; and/or non-ionic surfactants such as Tween or polyethylene glycol (PEG).
[0061] The Examples below, which are not intended to limit the invention, demonstrate that host enzymes that install and remove m.sup.6A increase in abundance in response to HCMV infection and regulate virus replication. While depleting the ALKBH5 demethylase stimulated viral protein accumulation and HCMV reproduction, interfering with the METTL3/14 methylase had the opposite effect. The impact of the cellular m.sup.6A modification machinery on HCMV growth resulted from differential IFNβ cytokine production, as IFNB1 mRNA accumulation was stimulated by METTL14-depletion and restricted by ALKBH5-depletion (
[0062] While cellular m.sup.6A modification enzymes control productive replication of the beta-herpesvirus HCMV by influencing IFNB1 accumulation and IFNβ cytokine production, effects on HSV-1, an alpha-herpesvirus subfamily member, and the prototypical poxvirus Vaccinia were not detected. Without intending to be bound by any particular theory, this might reflect differences in cell intrinsic anti-viral responses. Notably, cellular protein synthesis proceeds in HCMV-infected cells, in marked contrast to the strong suppression of ongoing host proteins synthesis observed in cells infected with HSV-1 or Vaccinia that effectively limit ISG expression (Zhu et al, 1997; Ishikawa et al., 2009). Replication of other viruses, including HIV and influenza A virus, is stimulated by the METTL3/14 m.sup.6A writer complex and may also in part reflect reduced IFNB1 induction (Courtney et al., 2017).
[0063] In embodiments, the disclosure provides compositions and methods for enhancing virus replication, and thus may be used to increase, for example, viral particle production for any purposes, including but not limited to producing viral particles for use in vaccines. In embodiments, the disclosure thus includes inhibiting the expression and/or function of ALKBH5 in cells, such as a cell culture, that is infected and/or has been transduced with a virus, allowing increased production of the virus, relative to production of the virus in cells in which ALKBH5 expression and/or function is not reduced, and separating the virus and/or viral particles from the cells. In embodiments, the viral particles are infectious, non-pathogenic viral particles for use as a vaccine. In embodiments, the disclosure comprises using cells in such a process, wherein ALKBH5 expression is knocked out in the cells, such as by using a CRISPR-gene editing approach. Such cells and use of such cells for producing viruses are included in the disclosure. In embodiments, the cells are mammalian cells, such as human cells. In embodiments, the cells are non-human primate cells.
[0064] Data presented in this disclosure indicates that IFNB1 mRNA is enriched in an m.sup.6A-containing mRNA fraction and its accumulation is controlled by the m.sup.6A methyltransferase subunit METTL14 and the demethylase ALKBH5. Depleting METTL14 increased IFNB1 mRNA stability, which is known to be controlled by ELAVL1/HuR-binding to AU-rich sequences in the 3′-UTR. Nucleic acid sensing pathways are thought to control ELAVL1/HuR activity (Herdy et al., 2015; Takiuichi, 2015), potentially explaining why IFNB1 mRNA stability was enhanced by METTL14-depletion in a manner dependent upon IFN signaling (
[0065] Unexpectedly, METTL14-depletion also stimulated EU incorporation into nascent, nuclear IFNB1 RNA following dsDNA treatment, whereas ALKBH5-depletion repressed it (
[0066] Genome-wide profiling data from uninfected NHDFs revealed responses to dsDNA exposure are regulated by METTL14 and ALKBH5. In particular, opposing, reciprocal effects on expression of 463 genes including IFNB1, approximately 32% of genes regulated by both METTL14 and ALKBH5-depletion, was observed in response to dsDNA. In contrast, the effects of ALKBH5 or METTL14-depletion were not entirely reciprocal genome-wide. 68% of genes responsive to both ALKBH5 and METTL14 depletion were co-regulated in the same direction. In addition to targeting an identical cohort of co-regulated and reciprocally regulated genes upon dsDNA treatment, METTL14 and ALKBH5 also target discrete gene sets with little overlap. This indicates that while ALKBH5 and METTL14 regulate innate immune responses via IFNB1 mRNA induction, they largely control different, non-overlapping biological processes.
[0067] In addition to infection biology, roles for cytoplasmic dsDNA signaling from non-microbial sources have emerged. The cytoplasmic DNA sensor cGAS controls senescence and senescent cells express greater levels of IFNB1 and proinflammatory cytokines as part of a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) (Takahashi et al., 2018; Li & Chen, 2018). By controlling IFNB1, cellular m.sup.6A modification enzymes might also impact aging, senescence and the pathogenic consequences of overcoming senescence associated with cancer. As cytoplasmic dsDNA signaling is also a trigger for inflammatory diseases, epitranscriptomic regulation of responses triggered by dsDNA could broadly impact pathophysiology associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic inflammation and interferonopathies (Gao et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2016; Crowl et al., 2017; Yan, 2017; Li et al., 2018). Thus, modulating IFNB1 as described herein is expected to be broadly applicable to prophylaxis and/or therapy for a wide array of disorders that involve pathological deregulation of inflammatory cytokines, such as IFNB1.
[0068] The following Examples are intended to illustrate but not limit the disclosure.
Example 1
[0069] Regulation of HCMV Replication by Host m.sup.6A Modification Enzymes
[0070] Since host protein synthesis is not impaired by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection (McKinney et al., 2014), we could examine how cellular functions required for m.sup.6A RNA modification responded to HCMV and influenced virus reproduction. Compared to uninfected primary human fibroblasts (NHDFs), HCMV infection resulted in accumulation of m.sup.6A methyltransferase subunits METTL3/14, m.sup.6A readers YTHDC1, YTHDF1,2,3 and the demethylases ALKBH5 and FTO between 12-72 h post-infection (
[0071] In response to viral gene expression, a less than two-fold increase in ALKBH5 mRNA was observed over time (
[0072] To determine how host m.sup.6A writers and erasers influenced virus replication, cultures were treated with siRNA specific for METTL3, METTL14, ALKBH5 or control, non-silencing siRNA. Subsequently, siRNA-treated NHDFs were mock-infected or infected with HCMV at a low multiplicity of infection, which allows for measurement of virus reproduction and spread through the culture. Compared to non-silencing siRNA-treated cultures, METTL3/14-specific siRNAs inhibited HCMV reproduction up to 11-fold (
Example 2
[0073] Cellular m.sup.6A Modification Enzymes Regulate IFNB1 mRNA Accumulation in HCMV-Infected Cells
[0074] To determine if host functions regulating m.sup.6A modification controlled anti-viral immune responses, IFNB1 mRNA abundance was measured in HCMV-infected cells treated with non-silencing siRNA or siRNA specific for METTL14 or ALKBH5. While IFNB1 mRNA levels were significantly elevated in cultures treated with METTL14 siRNA relative to non-silencing siRNA, ALKBH5 siRNA-treated cultures contained reduced IFNB1 mRNA (
Example 3
[0075] m.sup.6A Modification Enzymes and Reader Proteins Control Cell Intrinsic Innate Responses to dsDNA in Uninfected Cells
[0076] Since HCMV is a dsDNA virus, and dsDNA alone is sufficient to trigger IFNβ production (Chen et al., 2016), it was conceivable that the control of IFNβ cytokine production by m.sup.6A modifying enzymes might not be restricted to virus-infected cells. To test this possibility the capacity of cellular m.sup.6A writers and erasers to regulate innate IFNβ production in uninfected cells was evaluated. Addition of dsDNA effectively stimulated IFNB1 mRNA accumulation in non-silencing siRNA-treated cultures (
[0077] In addition to m.sup.6A writers and erasers, reader proteins that recognize m.sup.6A modified RNA could potentially impact IFNβ production in response to dsDNA in uninfected cells. Compared to NHDFs treated with control, non-silencing siRNA, depleting m.sup.6A readers YTHDF1 or YTHDF2 reduced IFNB1 mRNA induction in response to dsDNA (
Example 4
[0078] Regulation of Genome-Wide Responses to dsDNA by METTL14 and ALKBH5
[0079] To determine the extent to which cellular m.sup.6A functions control genome-wide responses to dsDNA, total RNA isolated from primary normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDFs) treated with non-silencing siRNA or siRNA specific for METTL14 or ALKBH5 and exposed to dsDNA for 6 and 12 h was analyzed by stranded mRNA sequencing (mRNA-seq). Following normalization and classification of differentially regulated genes (padj <0.01), 2,998 genes proved responsive to ALKBH5-depletion and 4,866 genes were responsive to METTL14-depletion after 12 h, compared to non-silencing siRNA-treated controls (
[0080] Compared to non-silencing siRNA-treated cultures, interfering with the m.sup.6A writer subunit METTL14 or the eraser ALKBH5 had a complex impact on gene expression in response to dsDNA (
[0081] Top pathways enriched among genes differentially expressed upon ALKBH5-depletion in dsDNA treated NHDFs included those controlling signaling by interferon, Wnt, NF-κB TNF, TGFβ, LPS, many of which impact infection biology and immune responses (
Example 5
[0082] IFNB1 mRNA Biogenesis and Decay are Regulated by m.sup.6A Modification Enzymes
[0083] To more precisely understand how METTL14 and ALKBH5 control IFNB1 production, we sought to define the underlying regulatory mechanism(s). Treating NHDFs with dsDNA for 7 h did not significantly change the subcellular distribution or overall abundance of cellular m.sup.6A reader, writer, or eraser proteins (
[0084] To analyze how cellular m.sup.6A writers and erasers influenced mRNA biogenesis, nascent RNA metabolically pulse-labeled with ethyluridine (EU) for 30 min. was isolated from nuclei of dsDNA-treated cells to limit the contribution of cytoplasmic mRNA decay.
[0085] To determine whether METTL14 or ALKBH5 also influenced IFNB1 mRNA decay, total EU pulse-labeled RNA was isolated from NHDFs treated with dsDNA and IFNB1 mRNA levels were measured by qRT-PCR. While decay of EU-labeled, nascent IFNB1 mRNA was indistinguishable in n.s. siRNA or ALKBH5-depleted cultures, EU-labeled IFNB1 mRNA persisted longer in METTL14-depleted cultures (
Example 6
[0086] Materials & Methods
[0087] Cells, viruses and chemicals. Normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDFs) (LONZA, CC-2509) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Corning 10-013-CV) supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml) and 5% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen). Vero cells (ATCC) were propagated in DMEM supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml) and 5% (v/v) calf serum (FBS; Invitrogen). BSC40 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml) and 10% (v/v) FBS. HCMV AD169GFP was kindly provided by Dong Yu and was propagated in NHDFs as described (Bianco & Mohr, 2017). Vaccinia Virus (Western Reserve strain) was propagated in BSC40 cells as described (Burgess & Mohr, 2015). Wild-type HSV-1 (Patton strain) expressing an EGFP-Us11 fusion protein (Benboudjema et al. 2003) was propagated in Vero cells. PP242 (P0037) was purchased from Sigma and used at a concentration of 25 μM.
[0088] DNA transfections. DNA was transfected using TranslT-X2 (Mims MIR6000) according to the manufacturer's protocol. VACV 70-mer (dsDNA) oligonucleotides were described previously (Unterholzner et al. 2010). Annealing buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA) without nucleic acids was used as negative control.
[0089] m.sup.6A RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP). Following poly-A+ selection, purified polyadenylated RNA (˜1 μg) resuspended in IPP buffer (150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) was denatured at 70° C. for 2 min. and subsequently placed on ice. 25 μl of Protein-G magnetic beads (Life Technologies 10004D), washed and suspended in IPP buffer containing RNAse inhibitor (Invitrogen 10777019), were incubated with 1 μg of monoclonal anti-m.sup.6A antibody at RT for 15 min with end-over-end rotation. RNA was added to the antibody-bound beads and incubated for 2 h at 4° C. with end-over-end rotation. RNA-bound beads were washed twice in 200 μl IPP buffer, twice in low-salt IPP buffer (50 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5), twice in high-salt IPP buffer (500 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5), and twice again in 200 μl of IPP buffer and eluted in 30 μl RLT (QIAGEN 79216). To purify the RNA, 20 μl MyOne Silane Dynabeads (Life Technologies 37002D) was washed with 100 μl RLT, resuspended in 30 μl RLT, and added to the eluted RNA. After addition of 60 μl 100% ethanol, the beads were collected magnetically and the supernatant discarded. The beads were washed twice in 100 μl 70% ethanol, and the RNA eluted in 160 μl IPP buffer. A second round of IP was performed by incubating the RNA with protein-A magnetic beads (Life Technologies 10002D) coupled to anti-m.sup.6A antibody, followed by washes, elution from the protein-A beads and purification as described above. The final RNA elution from the MyOne Silane Dynabeads was performed in 16 μl H.sub.2O followed immediately by cDNA synthesis.
[0090] Isolation of nuclear RNA. RNA from a nuclear fraction was isolated according to a protocol adapted from a published procedure (Wuarin & Schibler, 1994). Briefly, NHDFs were washed with PBS, scrapped int cold lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.15% NP40, 150 mM NaCl) and incubated on ice for 5 min. The lysate was then transferred onto 2.5 volumes of a chilled sucrose cushion (ice-cold sucrose buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 24% sucrose]), and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4° C. The supernatant (cytoplasmic fraction) was collected for RNA extraction by TRIzol. The pellet was resuspended in cytoplasmic lysis buffer without NP40 and passed through a fresh sucrose cushion for a second time. The washed nuclear fraction was then dissolved in TRIzol for RNA extraction.
[0091] Analysis of nascent RNA synthesis and decay. Transcription and stability of newly synthesized RNA were analysed using the Click-iT® Nascent RNA Capture Kit (Life Technologies C10365). To measure RNA decay, siRNA-treated NHDFs were stimulated with dsDNA. After 3 h, 0.2 mM Ethyluridine (EU) was added. Following a 2 h incubation with EU, the cells were washed with PBS and EU-free medium was added. Cells were harvested and RNA isolated with TRIzol at the indicated time points after the addition of EU-free media. The EU-labeled RNAs were biotinylated and captured by using the Click-iT® Nascent RNA Capture Kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions. To measure EU incorporation into newly synthesized nuclear RNA, siRNA-treated NHDFs stimulated with dsDNA were exposed to a 30 min EU pulse at the indicated times post-DNA addition. Following EU exposure, cells were washed with PBS, nuclear RNA was isolated as described in the preceding paragraph, and processed as described above.
[0092] Library preparation and sequencing. Illumina TruSeq stranded RNA libraries were prepared from poly(A)-selected total RNA (500 ng, RIN score 10) by staff at the New York University Genome Technology Center and sequenced across two PE150 Cycle lanes of a HiSeq 4000, yielding between 20,227,308-28,768,351 paired-end reads per sample (Table 1).
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Total Pseudoaligned % Pseudoaligned SRA Sample ID reads reads reads accession Study ID siALK-12h-1 27,577,975 19,387,112 70.30 SRR7049604 SRP141411 siALK-12h-2 23,119,676 14,714,334 63.64 SRR7049603 SRP141411 siALK-12h-3 26,914,918 18,226,817 67.72 SRR7049606 SRP141411 siALK-12h-dsDNA-1 25,423,948 16,182,307 63.65 SRR7049605 SRP141411 siALK-12h-dsDNA-2 23,796,444 16,259,094 68.33 SRR7049608 SRP141411 siALK-12h-dsDNA-3 26,040,459 17,643,600 67.75 SRR7049607 SRP141411 siALK-6h-dsDNA-1 27,113,209 18,473,963 68.14 SRR7049600 SRP141411 siALK-6h-dsDNA-2 26,632,328 17,851,911 67.03 SRR7049599 SRP141411 siALK-6h-dsDNA-3 27,310,965 18,645,613 68.27 SRR7049595 SRP141411 siCTRL-12h-1 27,841,502 19,164,375 68.83 SRR7049612 SRP141411 siCTRL-12h-2 24,816,513 17,167,924 69.18 SRR7049611 SRP141411 siCTRL-12h-3 26,864,295 18,714,077 69.66 SRR7049610 SRP141411 siCTRL-12h-dsDNA-1 25,398,238 17,262,131 67.97 SRR7049609 SRP141411 siCTRL-12h-dsDNA-2 24,975,861 17,013,712 68.12 SRR7049616 SRP141411 siCTRL-12h-dsDNA-3 25,803,024 17,809,057 69.02 SRR7049615 SRP141411 siCTRL-6h-dsDNA-1 27,382,992 18,953,034 69.21 SRR7049614 SRP141411 siCTRL-6h-dsDNA-2 25,875,984 17,620,743 68.10 SRR7049613 SRP141411 siCTRL-6h-dsDNA-3 26,161,781 17,735,955 67.79 SRR7049617 SRP141411 siL14-12h-1 24,022,747 16,031,935 66.74 SRR7049596 SRP141411 siL14-12h-2 20,227,308 13,331,114 65.91 SRR7049597 SRP141411 siL14-12h-3 24,297,328 16,805,940 69.17 SRR7049598 SRP141411 siL14-12h-dsDNA-1 23,376,433 15,874,448 67.91 SRR7049591 SRP141411 siL14-12h-dsDNA-2 22,322,121 14,883,534 66.68 SRR7049592 SRP141411 siL14-12h-dsDNA-3 26,387,134 18,140,154 68.75 SRR7049593 SRP141411 siL14-6h-dsDNA-1 23,244,321 15,522,639 66.78 SRR7049594 SRP141411 siL14-6h-dsDNA-2 28,768,351 5,865,627 20.39 SRR7049589 SRP141411 siL14-6h-dsDNA-3 24,024,280 16,500,107 68.68 SRR7049590 SRP141411
[0093] For m.sup.6A RNA sequencing, RNA fragments with m.sup.6A-modifications were captured by RIP as described in the preceding section except that a polyclonal m.sup.6A antibody was used (Dominissini et al, 2013). m.sup.6A-Seq IP and input libraries were prepared from 5-10 ng of RNA using the NEBNext® Ultra™ II RNA Library Prep (New England Biolabs) following the FFPE entry protocol. Twelve libraries were multiplexed and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 using a single 75 cycle high output kit v2 (single end read mode), yielding 27,000,000-42,000,000 single-end reads per sample (Table 2). Analysis of m.sup.6A sequencing is described in the supplementary methods.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 % % unique- Mapping mapping Unique-mapping mapping SRA Sample Total reads reads reads reads reads accession bufINPUT1 39,446,113 11,636,466 79.95 9,596,115 82.47 SRR7992458 bufINPUT2 36,598,934 10,534,157 79.04 8,665,662 82.26 SRR7992461 bufINPUT3 36,955,536 11,321,597 79.69 9,450,692 83.47 SRR7992460 bufIP1 38,452,765 12,259,651 82.98 10,562,969 86.16 SRR7992455 bufIP2 49,975,935 14,733,666 83.28 12,676,820 86.04 SRR7992454 bufIP3 27,130,961 9,935,800 83.72 8,511,744 85.67 SRR7992459 dsINPUT1 42,503,116 11,040,090 72.28 9,329,018 84.5 SRR7992450 dsINPUT2 32,864,139 8,988,320 73.93 7,566,020 84.18 SRR7992457 dsINPUT3 42,746,912 11,050,076 72.69 9,393,032 85 SRR7992456 dsIP1 33,580,979 10,449,366 79.76 9,078,676 86.88 SRR7992453 dsIP2 48,038,886 13,379,307 78.17 11,636,545 86.97 SRR7992452 dsIP3 40,230,672 11,960,350 80.68 10,471,851 87.55 SRR7992451
[0094] RNASeq analysis. Sequence reads were pseudoaligned against a Homo sapiens transcriptome database comprising the latest cDNA and ncRNA databases from Ensembl using Kallisto (Bray et al., 2016) under default parameters. Raw transcript counts were parsed to generate raw gene counts and analysed using the DESeq2 v1.18.1 (Love et al., 2014) package in R. Two samples (siAlk-12 h-2 and siL14-6 h-dsDNA-2) were excluded from analyses based on PCA clustering and low total read counts, respectively (
[0095] Data availability. All sequencing data generated during this study are available from the sequence read archive (SRA) under the BioProject ID PRJNA451188.
[0096] References for the foregoing description. [0097] 1. Aguilo F, Zhang F, Sancho A, Fidalgo M, Di Cecilia S, Vashisht A, Lee D F, Chen C H, Rengasamy M, Andino B, et al. 2015. Coordination of m.sup.6A mRNA methylation and gene transcription by ZFP217 regulates pluripotency and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 17: 689-704. [0098] 2. Benboudjema L, Mulvey M, Gao Y, Pimplikar S W, Mohr I. 2003. Association of the herpes simplex virus type 1 Us11 gene product with the cellular kinesin light-chain related protein PAT1 results in the redistribution of both polypeptides. J. Virol. 77: 9192-203. [0099] 3. Bianco C, Mohr I. 2017. Restriction of Human Cytomegalovirus Replication by ISG15, a Host Effector Regulated by cGAS-STING Double-Stranded-DNA Sensing. J. Virol. 91: pii: e02483-16. [0100] 4. Boeckh M, Geballe A P. 2011. Cytomegalovirus: pathogen, paradigm, and puzzle. J Clin Invest 121: 1673-1680. [0101] 5. Britt W. 2008. Manifestations of human cytomegalovirus infection: proposed mechanisms of acute and chronic disease, p 417-470. In Shenk T E, Stinski M F. (ed), Human cytomegalovirus. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [0102] 6. Bray N L, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L. 2016. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3519. [0103] 7. Brocard M, Ruggieri A, Locker N. 2017. m.sup.6A RNA methylation, a new hallmark in virus-host interactions. J. Gen. Virol. 98: 2207-2214. [0104] 8. Burgess, H M, Mohr I. 2015. Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA exonuclease Xrn1 controls double-stranded RNA accumulation and anti-viral responses. Cell Host Microbe 17: 332-344. [0105] 9. Cannon M J, Schmid D S, Hyde T B. 2010. Review of cytomegalovirus seroprevalence and demographic characteristics associated with infection. Rev Med Virol 20: 202-213. [0106] 10. Coots R A, Liu X M, Mao Y, Dong L, Zhou J, Wan J, Zhang X, Qian S B. 2017. m.sup.6A Facilitates eIF4F-Independent mRNA Translation. Mol Cell. 68: 504-514.e7. [0107] 11. Chen C A, Shyu A B. 2017. Decay Emerging Themes in Regulation of Global mRNA Turnover in cis. Trends Biochem Sci. 42: 16-27. [0108] 12. Chen Q, Sun L, Chen Z J. 2016. Regulation and function of the cGAS-STING pathway of cytosolic DNA sensing. Nat Immunol. 17: 1142-1149. [0109] 13. Coppé J-P, Patil, C K, Rodier F, Sun Y, Munoz D P, Goldastein J, Nelson P S, Desprez P-Y, Campisi J. 2008. Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotypes Reveal Cell-Nonautonomous Functions of Oncogenic RAS and the p53 Tumor Suppressor. PLoS Biol. 6: e301. [0110] 14. Courtney D G, Kennedy E M, Dumm R E, Bogerd H P, Tsai K, Heaton N S, Cullen B R 2017. Epitranscriptomic Enhancement of Influenza A Virus Gene Expression and Replication. Cell Host & Microbe 22: 377-386. [0111] 15. Crowl J T, Gray E E, Pestal K, Volkman H E, Stetson D B. 2017. Intracellular Nucleic Acid Detection in Autoimmunity. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 35: 313-336. [0112] 16. Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Salmon-Divon M, Amariglio N, Rechavi G. 2013. Transcriptome-wide mapping of N(6)-methyladenosine by m(6)A-seq based on immuno-capturing and massively parallel sequencing. Nat Protoc. 8: 176-189. [0113] 17. Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Schwartz S, Salmon-Divon M, Ungar L, Osenberg S, Cesarkas K, Jacob-Hirsch J, Amariglio N, Kupiec M, et al. 2012. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 485: 201-206. [0114] 18. Du H, Zhao Y, He J, Zhang Y, Xi H, Liu M, Ma J, Wu L. 2016. YTHDF2 destabilizes m6A-containing RNA through direct recruitment of the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex. Nat. Commun. 7: 12626. [0115] 19. Edupuganti R R, Geiger S, Lindeboom R G H, Shi H, Hsu P J, Lu Z, Wang S Y, Baltissen M P A, Jansen PWTC, Rossa M, et al. 2017. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) recruits and repels proteins to regulate mRNA homeostasis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 24: 870-878. [0116] 20. Fustin J.-M. et al. 2013. RNA-methylation-dependent RNA processing controls the speed of the circadian clock. Cell 155: 793-806. [0117] 21. Favaro E, Bensaad K, Chong M G, Tennant D A, Ferguson D J P, Snell C, Steers G, Turley H, Li J-L, Gunther U L, et al. (2012). Glucose Utilization via Glycogen Phosphorylase Sustains Proliferation and Prevents Premature Senescence in Cancer Cells. Cell Metab. 9. 16: 751-764. [0118] 22. Gao D, Li T, Li X D, Chen X, Li Q Z, Wight-Carter M, Chen Z J. 2015. Activation of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase by self-DNA causes autoimmune diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: E5699-705. [0119] 23. Gokhale N S, McIntyre A B, McFadden M J, Roder A E, Kennedy E M, Gandara J A, et al. 2016. N6-Methyladenosine in Flaviviridae Viral RNA Genomes Regulates Infection. Cell Host Microbe 20: 654-665. [0120] 24. Gonzales-van Horn S R, Sarnow P. 2017. Making the Mark: The Role of Adenosine Modifications in the Life Cycle of RNA Viruses. Cell Host Microbe. 21: 661-669. [0121] 25. Haussmann I U, Bodi Z, Sanchez-Moran E, Mongan N P, Archer N, Fray R G, Soller M. 2016. m6A potentiates Sxl alternative pre-mRNA splicing for robust Drosophila sex determination. Nature. 540: 301-304. [0122] 26. Herdy B K T, Vladimer G. I, Tan, C S H, Stukalov A, Trefzer C Bigenzahn J. 2015. The RNA-binding protein HuR/ELAVL1 regulates IFN-β mRNA abundance and the type I IFN response. Eur. Immunol. 45: 1500-1511. [0123] 27. Hesser C R, Karijolich J, Dominissini D, He C, Glaunsinger B A. 2018. N6-methyl-adenosine modification and the YTHDF2 reader protein play cell type specific roles in lytic viral gene expression during Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1006995. [0124] 28. Huang D W, Sherman B T, Lempicki R A. 2009a. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: Paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nuc. Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn923. [0125] 29. Huang D W, Sherman B T, Lempicki R A. 2009b. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [0126] 30. Ishikawa H, Ma Z, Barber G N. 2009. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature. 461:, 788-792. [0127] 31. Jia G, Fu Y, Zhao X, Dai Q, Zheng G, Yang Y, Yi C, Lindahl T, Pan T, Yang Y G, He C. 2011. N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7: 885-887. [0128] 32. Ke S, Pandya-Jones, S Y, Fak J J, Vågbø C B, Geula S, Hanna J H, Black D L, Darnell J E Jr, Darnell R B. 2017. m.sup.6A mRNA modifications are deposited in nascent pre-mRNA and are not required for splicing but do specify cytoplasmic turnover. Genes Dev. 31: 990-1006. [0129] 33. Kennedy E M, Bogerd H P, Kornepati A V R, Kang D, Ghoshal D, Marshall J B, Poling, B C, Tsai K, Gokhale N S, Homer S M, Cullen B R. 2016. Post-transcriptional m(6)A Editing of HIV-1 mRNAs Enhances Viral Gene Expression. Cell Host Microbe 19: 675-685. [0130] 34. Lavi S, Shatkin A J. 1975. Methylated simian virus 40-specific RNA from nuclei and cytoplasm of infected BSC-1 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 2012-2016. [0131] 35. Li T, Chen Z J. 2018. The cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway connects DNA damage to inflammation, senescence, and cancer. J Exp Med. April 5. pii: jem.20180139. [0132] 36. Li L J, Fan Y G, Leng R X, Pan H F, Ye D Q. 2018. Potential link between m6A modification and systemic lupus erythematosus. Mol Immunol. 93: 55-63. [0133] 37. Lichinchi G, Gao S, Saletore Y, Gonzalez G M, Bansal V, Wang Y, Mason C E, Rana T M. 2016a. Dynamics of the human and viral m(6)A RNA methylomes during HIV-1 infection of T cells. Nat. Microbiol. 1: 16011. [0134] 38. Lichinchi G, Zhao B S, Wu Y, Lu Z, Qin Y, He C, Rana T M. 2016b. Dynamics of Human and Viral RNA Methylation during Zika Virus Infection. Cell Host Microbe 20: 666-673. [0135] 39. Linder B, Grozhik A V, Olarerin-George A O, Meydan C, Mason C E, Jaffrey S R. 2015. Single-nucleotide-resolution mapping of m6A and m6Am throughout the transcriptome. Nat Methods. 12: 767-772. [0136] 40. Liu N, Dai Q, Zheng G, He C, Parisen M, Pan T. 2015. N6-methyl-adenosine-dependent RNA structural switches regulate RNA-protein interactions. Nature 518: 560-564. [0137] 41. Liu N, Zhou K I, Parisien M, Dai Q, Diachenko L, Pan T. 2017. N6-methyladenosine alters RNA structure to regulate binding of a low-complexity protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 6051-6063. [0138] 42. Liu J, Yue Y, Han D, Wang X, Fu Y, Zhang L, Jia G, Yu M, Lu Z, Deng X, Dai Q, Chen W, He C. (2014). A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10: 93-95. [0139] 43. Ljungman P, Hakki M, Boeckh M. 2010. Cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Infect Dis. Clin. North Am. 24: 319-337. [0140] 44. Love M I, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome iol. haps://doi org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [0141] 45. Manicklal S, Emery V C, Lazzarotto T, Boppana S B, Gupta R K. 2013. The “silent” global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26: 86-102. [0142] 46. Mauer J, Luo X, Blanjoie A, Jiao X, Grozhik A V, Patil D P, Linder B, Pickering B F, Vasseur J J, Chen Q, Gross S S, Elemento O, Debart F, Kiledjian M, Jaffrey S R. 2017. Reversible methylation of m6Am in the 5=cap controls mRNA stability. Nature 541: 371-375. [0143] 47. McKinney C, Perez C, Mohr I. 2012. Poly(A) binding protein abundance regulates eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F assembly in human cytomegalovirus-infected cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109: 5627-5632. [0144] 48. McKinney C, Zavadil J, Bianco C, Shiflett L, Brown S, Mohr I. 2014. GlobalReprogramming of the Cellular Translational Landscape Facilitates Cytomegalovirus Replication. Cell Rep. 6: 9-17. [0145] 49. Mer Merkestein M, Laber S, McMurray F, Andrew D, Sachse G, Sanderson J, Li M, Usher S, Sellayah D, Ashcroft F M, Cox R D. 2015. FTO influences adipogenesis by regulating mitotic clonal expansion. Nat. Commun. 6: 6792. [0146] 50. Meyer K D, Patil D P, Zhou J, Zinoviev A, Skabkin M A, Elemento O, Pestova T V, Qian S B, Jaffrey S R. 2015. 5′ UTR m6A promotes cap-independent translation. Cell 163: 999-1010. [0147] 51. Meyer K D, Saletore Y, Zumbo P, Elemento O, Mason C E, Jaffrey S R. 2012. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 30 UTRs and near stop codons. Cell 149: 1635-1646. [0148] 52. Moss B, Gershowitz A, Stringer J R, Holland L E, Wagner E K. 1977. 5′-Terminal and internal methylated nucleosides in herpes simplex virus type 1 mRNA. J. Virol. 23: 234-239. [0149] 53. Patil D P, Pickering B F, Jaffrey S R. 2018. Reading m6A in the Transcriptome: m6A-Binding Proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 28: 113-127. [0150] 54. Razonable R R, Humar A., 2013. AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplantation. Am. J. Transplant 13: 93-106. [0151] 55. Roost C. et al. 2015. Structure and thermodynamics of N6-methyladenosine in RNA: a spring-loaded base modification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137: 2107-2115. [0152] 56. Rosa-Mercado N A, Withers J B, Steitz J A. 2017. Settling the m6A debate: methylation of mature mRNA is not dynamic but accelerates turnover. Genes Dev. 31: 957-958. [0153] 57. Roundtree I A, Evans M E, Pan T, He C. 2017. Dynamic RNA Modifications in Gene Expression Regulation. Cell 169: 1187-1200. [0154] 58. Sanchez I, Dynlacht B D 2016. Cilium assembly and disassembly. Nat Cell Biol. 18: 711-717. [0155] 59. Schoggins J W, Wilson S J, Panis M, Murphy M Y, Jones C T, Bieniasz P, Rice C M. 2011. A diverse range of gene products are effectors of the type I interferon antiviral response. Nature. 472: 481-485. [0156] 60. Sommer S, Salditt-Georgieff M, Bachenheimer S, Darnell J E, Furuichi Y, Morgan M, et al. 1976. The methylation of adenovirus-specific nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA. Nuc. Acids Res. 3: 749-765. [0157] 61. Takahashi A, Loo T M, Okada R, Kamachi F, Watanabe Y, Wakita M, Watanabe S, Kawamoto S, Miyata K, Barber G N, Ohtani N, Hara E. 2018. Downregulation of cytoplasmic DNases is implicated in cytoplasmic DNA accumulation and SASP in senescent cells. Nat Commun. 9: 1249. [0158] 62. Takiuichi, O. 2015. HuR keeps interferon-β mRNA stable. Eur. J. Immunol. 45: 1296-1299. [0159] 63. Tan, B., Liu H, Zhang S, da Silva S R, Zhang L, Meng J, Cui X, Yuan H, Sorel O, Zhang S W, et al., 2018. Viral and cellular N6-methyladenosine and N6,2′-O-dimethyl-adenosine epitranscriptomes in the KSHV life cycle. Nat Microbiol. 3: 108-120. [0160] 64. Tirosh O, Cohen Y, Shitrit A, Shani O, Le-Trilling V T K, Trilling M, Friedlander G, Tanenbaum M, Stern-Ginossar N. (2015). The transcription and translation landscapes during human cytomegalovirus infection reveal novel host-pathogen interactions. PLoS Pathog 11: e1005288. [0161] 65. Tirumuru N, Zhao B S, Lu W, Lu Z, He C, Wu L. 2016. N(6)-methyl-adenosine of HIV-1 RNA regulates viral infection and HIV-1 Gag protein expression. eLife 5: e15528. [0162] 66. Tsai K, Courtney D G, Cullen B R. 2018. Addition of m6A to SV40 late mRNAs enhances viral structural gene expression and replication. PLoS Pathog. 14: e1006919. [0163] 67. Unterholzner et al. 2010. IFI16 is an innate immune sensor for intracellular DNA. Nat. Immunol. 11: 997-1004. [0164] 68. Vu L P, Pickering B F, Cheng Y, Zaccara S, Nguyen D, Minuesa G, Chou T, Chow A, Saletore Y, MacKay M, et al. 2017. The N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-forming enzyme METTL3 controls myeloid differentiation of normal hematopoietic and leukemia cells. Nat Med. 23: 1369-1376. [0165] 69. Wang X, Lu Z, Gomez A, Hon G C, Yue Y, Han D, Fu Y, Parisien M, Dai Q, Jia G, et al. 2014) N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature. 505: 117-20. [0166] 70. Wuarin J, Schibler U. 1994. Physical isolation of nascent RNA chains transcribed by RNA polymerase II: evidence for cotranscriptional splicing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 7219-7225. [0167] 71. Wen J, Lv R, Ma H, Shen H, He C, Wang J, Jiao F, Liu H, Yang P, Tan L, et al., 2018. Zc3 h13 Regulates Nuclear RNA m.sup.6A Methylation and Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal. Mol Cell. 69: 1028-1038. [0168] 72. Wojtas M N, Pandey R R, Mendel M, Homolka D, Sachidanandam R, Pillai R S. 2017. Regulation of m6A Transcripts by the 3′.fwdarw.5′ RNA Helicase YTHDC2 Is Essential for a Successful Meiotic Program in the Mammalian Germline. Mol Cell. 68: 374-387. [0169] 73. Yan N. 2017. Immune Diseases Associated with TREX1 and STING Dysfunction. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 37:198-206. [0170] 74. Yue Y, Liu J, He C. 2015. RNA N6-methyladenosine methylation in post-transcriptional gene expression regulation. Genes Dev. 29: 1343-1355. [0171] 75. Zheng, G. Q. et al. 2013. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol. Cell 49:18-29. [0172] 76. Zheng Q, Hou J, Zhou Y, Li Z, Cao X. 2017. The RNA helicase DDX46 inhibits innate immunity by entrapping m6A-demethylated antiviral transcripts in the nucleus. Nat. Immunol. 18: 1094-1103. [0173] 77. Zhou J, Wan J, Gao X, Zhang X, Jaffrey S R, Qian S B. 2015. Dynamic m(6)A mRNA methylation directs translational control of heat shock response. Nature. 526: 591-594 [0174] 78. Zhou J, Wan J, Shu X E, Mao Y, Liu X M, Yuan X, Zhang X, Hess M E, Bruning J C, Qian S B. 2018. N.sup.6Methyladenosine Guides mRNA Alternative Translation during Integrated Stress Response. Mol Cell 69: 636-647. [0175] 79. Zhu H, Cong J P, Shenk T. 1997. Use of differential display analysis to assess the effect of human cytomegalovirus infection on the accumulation of cellular RNAs: induction of interferon-responsive RNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94 13985-13990.
Example 7
[0176] Supplemental Materials & Methods
[0177] Immunoblotting and Antibodies. Total Cellular Protein was Collected by Lysis in sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.7M β-mercaptoethanol) followed by boiling for 3 min. Lysates were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting using the following antibodies: anti-ALKBH5 (Sigma SAB1407587), anti-FTO (Abcam ab124892), mouse anti-m.sup.6A monoclonal (Synaptic Systems 202111), rabbit anti-m6A polyclonal (Synaptic Systems 202003), anti-METTL14 (Sigma HPA038002), anti-METTL3 (Proteintech 15073-1 AP), anti-WTAP (Proteintech 60188-1-Ig), anti-YTHDF1 (Proteintech 17479-1-AP), anti-YTHDF2 (Proteintech 24744-1-AP), anti-YTHDF3 (Proteintech 25537-1-AP), anti-YTHDC1 (Abeam ab122340), anti-STAT1 (Cell Signaling 9172), anti-STAT1 Y701 (Cell Signaling 7649), anti-MIDAS (Proteintech 21775-1-AP), anti-pTBK1 S172 (Cell Signaling 5483), anti-TBK1 (Cell Signaling 3504), anti-pIRF3 S396 (Cell Signaling 4947), anti-IRF3 (Proteintech 11312-1-AP), anti-11(13a (Proteintech 10268-1-AP), anti-4E-BP1 (Bethyl Laboratories A300-501A), anti-actin (Cell Signaling 3700), anti-actin (Cell Signaling 3700), anti-GAPDH (Cell Signaling 2118); anti-pp28 (Virusys CA004-100), anti-UL44 (Virusys CA006), and anti-IE1/IE2 (Millipore MAB810). Primary antibodies were detected using either anti-mouse IgG HRP (GE Healthcare NA93 IV) or anti-rabbit IgG HRP (GE Healthcare NA934V) secondary antibodies and visualized by chemiluminescent detection.
[0178] RNA interference. siRNAs (20 nM) were transfected using RNAimax (Invitrogen 13778075) according to the manufacturer's instructions. METTL3-specific siRNA [5′-CUGCAAGUAUGUUCACUAUGA-3′, (SEQ ID NO:23) Liu et al., 2014] was synthesized by Sigma. The following siRNAs were purchased from Sigma: METTL14 (SASI_Hs01_00179440), ALKBH5 (SASI_Hs01_00013942), FTO (SASI_Hs02_00314786), YTHDF1 (SASI_Hs01_00233688), YTHDF2 (SASI_Hs01_00133214), YTHDF3 (SASI_Hs01_00202277), STING (SASI_Hs02_00371843); AllStars negative-control siRNA was purchased from Qiagen.
[0179] Real-time PCR. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was prepared using qScript XLT cDNA SuperMix (Quantabio 84358). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad 172-5274) in a Bio-Rad C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler with the following primers (Table 3):
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 mRNA Forward Reverse IFNB1 5′-GAAAGAAGATTT 5′-CCTTCAGGTAAT CACCAGGG-3′ GCAGAATC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 1) (SEQ ID NO: 2) GAPDH 5′-TCTTTTGCGTCG 5′-ACCAGGCGCCCA CCAGCCGA-3′ ATACGACC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 3) (SEQ ID NO: 4) DICER1 5′-AAATGGGAAATG 5′-AGTATACCTGTC TGATCCAG-3′ TAAGACCAC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 5) (SEQ ID NO: 6) METTL3 5′-CGGGTAGATGAA 5′-GATTTCCTTTGA ATTATTTGGG-3′ CACCAACC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 7) (SEQ ID NO: 8) METTL14 5′-ACTAGAAATGCA 5′-GATTTAAGCTCT ACAGGATG-3′ GTGTTCCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 9) (SEQ ID NO: 10) ALKBH5 5′-CGGCGAAGGCTA 5′-CCACCAGCTTTT CACTTACG-3′ GGATCACCA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 11) (SEQ ID NO: 12) YTHDF1 5′-CCAGAGAACAAA 5′-TTTGACTGTCCA AGGACAAG-3′ GTAAGGTAG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 13) (SEQ ID NO: 14) YTHDF2 5′-CCAAGAGGAAGA 5′-AGTCCTAATTCT AGAAAGTG-3′ CTTGAAGGTC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 15) (SEQ ID NO: 16) YTHDF3 5′-ATCAGAGTAACA 5′-CCCAGGTTGACT GCTATCCAC-3′ AAATACAC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 17) (SEQ ID NO: 18) YTHDC1 5′-AAGAGAGCTAGA 5′-ATGCTTCTTTTC GGCATATC-3′ TGAACCTG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 19) (SEQ ID NO: 20) PPIA 5′-CCCACCGTGTTC 5′-TCTTTGGGACCT TTCGACAT-3′ TGTCTGCAA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 21) (SEQ ID NO: 22)
[0180] Type I interferon (IFN) Bioassay. Type I IFN was quantified using the reporter cell line HEK-Blue™ IFN-α/β (InvivoGen, hkb-ifnab) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, HEK-Blue IFN-α/β cells in 1804, media were incubated with 20 μL NHDF cell culture supernatant at 37° C. and 5% CO2 for 24 hours. Secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) activity was detected by incubating 20 μL HEK-Blue IFN-α/β supernatant with 180 μL QUANTI-Blue™ (InvivoGen, rep-qbl) alkaline phosphatase substrate at 37° C. and 5% CO2 for 15 min. SEAP activity was quantified by measuring the optical density at 640 nm in a SpectraMax M3 plate reader and converted to IFN units using a standard curve generated by quantifying SEAP activity in the supernatant of HEK-Blue IFN-α/β cells incubated with recombinant IFNβ protein (PBL Assay Science, 11415-1).
[0181] Indirect Immunofluorescence. NHDFs grown on coverslips were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.5% TritonX-100 in PBS for 10 min and then blocked with 4% FBS. Immunostaining was performed using the appropriate primary and secondary antibodies. DNA was stained with 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Images were captured using a Leica DM5000 microscope equipped with Leica Imaging Software.
[0182] Analysis of m.sup.6A RNA sequencing. Following demultiplexing, sequence reads were deduplicated using BBtools (bbduk.sh) after which sequencing adapters were removed and low quality ends trimmed using TrimGalore (://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore) [trim_galore --length 25 infile --clip_R1 5]. Sequence reads were subsequently mapped to hg19 using bowtie2 (Langmead & Salzberg, 2012) and parsed using SAMTools (Li et al., 20019) to yield sorted, indexed BAM files. m.sup.6A-peak regions were subsequently identified using exomePeak (Meng et al., 2014) and visualized using IGV (Robinson et al., 2011) and GVIZ (Hahne & Ivanek, 2016).
SUPPLEMENTARY REFERENCES
[0183] 1. Hahne F, Ivanek R. 2016. Visualizing Genomic Data Using Gviz and Bioconductor. Methods Mol Biol. 1418: 335-351. [0184] 2. Langmead B, Salzberg S L. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 9: 357-359. [0185] 3. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 25: 2078-2079. [0186] 4. Liu J, Yue Y, Han D, Wang X, Fu Y, Zhang L, Jia G, Yu M, Lu Z, Deng X, Dai Q, Chen W, He C. (2014). A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10: 93-95. [0187] 5. Meng J, Cui X, Rao M K, Chen Y, Huang Y. 2013. Exome-based analysis for RNA epigenome sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 29:1565-1567. [0188] 6. Meng J, Lu Z, Liu H, Zhang L, Zhang S, Chen Y, Rao M K, Huang Y. 2014. A protocol for RNA methylation differential analysis with MeRIP-Seq data and exomePeak R/Bioconductor package. Methods. 69: 274-281. [0189] 7. Robinson J T, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander E S, Getz G Mesirov J P. 2011, Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol; 29(1):24-6.
[0190] The foregoing description and examples are intended to illustrate, but not limit the invention.