Adaptive morphing engine geometry

Abstract

A morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry comprising a control surface having an articulated portion comprising a flexible skin coupled at an exterior of the articulated portion, the flexible skin comprising opposed interlocking elements sandwiched within a flexible polymer coupled to the interlocking elements; wherein the flexible skin is configured compliant responsive to an articulation of the articulated portion.

Claims

1. A morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry comprising: a control surface having an articulated portion comprising a flexible skin coupled at an exterior of said articulated portion, said flexible skin comprising opposed interlocking elements sandwiched within a flexible polymer coupled to said interlocking elements; wherein said flexible skin is configured compliant responsive to an articulation of said articulated portion; said interlocking elements comprise at least one upper element and at least one lower element opposite said at least one upper element; said at least one upper element comprises an upper element exterior surface and an upper element interior surface having a feature opposite said upper element exterior surface; said at least one lower element comprises a lower element exterior surface and a lower element interior surface with a feature opposite said lower element exterior surface; said upper element interior feature configured to interlock with a lower element interior feature; said upper element interior feature comprises a peg extending out of a portion of said upper element interior surface and said lower element interior feature comprises a receiver formed in said lower element interior surface.

2. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said articulated portion is part of a gas turbine engine component selected from the group consisting of a variable geometry splitter, gas flow path, a static engine component, a variable inlet guide vane and an adaptive flap.

3. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said flexible polymer surrounding said interlocking elements comprises a high temperature polymer volcanized to said interlocking elements.

4. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said flexible polymer comprises a lower stiffness than said interlocking elements.

5. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said interlocking elements are configured to interlock with a predetermined limit to slide and rotate relative to each other and maintain contact.

6. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said control surface is configured to articulate into a curved surface configured to produce an aerodynamic effect on a gas passing over said control surface.

7. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said interlocking elements sandwiched within said flexible polymer are configured in a mosaic pattern.

8. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said interlocking elements comprise at least one of a metal material and a ceramic composite material.

9. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said interlocking elements sandwiched within said flexible polymer are configured in a spaced apart pattern.

10. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said interlocking elements sandwiched within said flexible polymer comprise a smooth exterior surface.

11. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said interlocking elements are bonded together by said flexible polymer.

12. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said interlocking elements sandwiched within said flexible polymer comprise polygonal shapes.

13. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 1, wherein said interlocking elements sandwiched within said flexible polymer are formed in multiple layers.

14. A morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry comprising: a control surface having an articulated portion comprising a flexible skin coupled at an exterior of said articulated portion, said flexible skin comprising opposed interlocking elements sandwiched within a flexible polymer coupled to said interlocking elements; said flexible skin is configured compliant responsive to an articulation of said articulated portion; said interlocking elements comprise at least one upper element and at least one lower element opposite said at least one upper element; said at least one upper element comprises an upper element exterior surface and an upper element interior feature opposite said upper element exterior surface; said at least one lower element comprises a lower element exterior surface and a lower element interior feature opposite said lower element exterior surface; said upper element interior feature configured to interlock with the lower element interior feature; said upper element interior feature and said lower element interior feature comprises inverted edges along a portion of said upper element and said lower element respectively; said inverted edges comprise corners bend into flat hooks facing said interior surface for each of said upper element and said lower element.

15. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 14, wherein said inverted edges of said upper element and said inverted edges of said lower element interlock at said corners.

16. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 14, wherein said interlocking elements sandwiched within said flexible polymer are configured in a mosaic pattern.

17. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 14, wherein said interlocking elements comprise at least one of a metal material and a ceramic composite material.

18. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 14, wherein said interlocking elements sandwiched within said flexible polymer are configured in a spaced apart pattern.

19. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 14, wherein said interlocking elements sandwiched within said flexible polymer comprise a smooth exterior surface.

20. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 14, wherein said interlocking elements are bonded together by said flexible polymer.

21. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 14, wherein said interlocking elements sandwiched within said flexible polymer comprise polygonal shapes.

22. The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry according to claim 14, wherein said interlocking elements sandwiched within said flexible polymer are formed in multiple layers.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an adaptive flap for a turbine engine.

(2) FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of an exemplary variable geometry splitter for a turbine engine.

(3) FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of an exemplary adaptive flap for turbine engine with a morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry.

(4) FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of an exemplary flexible skin.

(5) FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of an exemplary flexible skin.

(6) FIG. 6 is a schematic representation of a portion of an exemplary interlocking elements.

(7) FIG. 7 is a cross sectional schematic representation of a portion of exemplary interlocking elements within a flexible polymer.

(8) FIG. 8 is a schematic representation of exemplary interlocking elements in multiple views.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(9) Referring now to FIGS. 1-3, there is illustrated a turbine engine component 10, such as a variable inlet guide vane, a variable geometry splitter, gas flow path, a static engine component, and an adaptive flap. The turbine engine component 10 has an airfoil portion 12 with a leading edge 14 and a trailing edge 16. The component 10 includes a control surface 18 covering an articulated portion 20. The articulated portion 20 is shown proximate the trailing edge 16 but can also be located proximate the leading edge 14 and portions between the leading edge 14 and trailing edge 16. An axis 22 can be utilized to manipulate the articulated portion 20. In the exemplary embodiments shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 the axis 22 is a pivot for a flap 24 to rotate about.

(10) The articulated portion 20 includes an exterior 26. A flexible skin 28 is coupled to the exterior 26 of the articulated portion 20. The flexible skin 28 is configured to be compliant responsive to an articulation of the articulated portion 20.

(11) Referring also to FIGS. 4 to 8, the flexible skin 28 includes opposed interlocking elements 30. The interlocking elements 30 can be sandwiched between a flexible polymer 32. Polyurethane based elastomers have an excellent combination of high strength, toughness and low modulus and may be one of the candidates for achieving the “shape-change” functionality. The interlocking elements 30 can be bonded together by the flexible polymer 32. The interlocking elements 30 sandwiched within the flexible polymer can be configured in a mosaic pattern 60 and can be spaced apart. The interlocking elements 30 comprise at least one of a metal material and a ceramic composite material.

(12) The interlocking elements 30 can be formed into polygonal, square, rectangle, triangle shapes and the like. The interlocking elements 30 can be sandwiched with the flexible polymer 32 in multiple layers as seen at FIG. 2. The flexible polymer 32 surrounding the interlocking elements 30 can comprise a high temperature polymer volcanized to the interlocking elements 30. The adhesive joint between the flexible polymer 32 and the interlocking elements 30 can be constructed from stiffer materials like aluminum or other light metals, for example, an aluminum surface can be treated with a phosphoric acid etching process to grow an oxide surface having a rough topography. If the adhesive/elastomer is able to fully wet this surface the bond strength will be increased.

(13) In an exemplary embodiment, the flexible polymer 32 comprises a lower stiffness than the interlocking elements 30, such that when a torque is applied to the axis 22 the articulated portion 20 shifts the flexible skin 28 to place the flexible polymer 32 into a shear load SL, such that the flexible polymer 32 is displaced in the direction of the load. The desired curvilinear shape of the control surface 18 is achieved. The interlocking elements 30 are configured to interlock with a predetermined limit to slide and rotate relative to each other and maintain contact with each other. The control surface 18 is configured to articulate into a curved surface 50 configured to produce an aerodynamic effect 52 on a gas 54 passing over said control surface 18.

(14) In another exemplary embodiment the trailing edge 16 is altered by the nonlinear stiffness of the control surface 18 having the flexible polymer 32 sandwiching the relatively stiff interlocking elements 30 in combination of thicknesses on the interlocking elements 30 and the layers of flexible polymer 32 (see insert of FIG. 2).

(15) The interlocking elements 30 comprise at least one upper element 34 and at least one lower element 36 opposite the at least one upper element 34. The upper element 34 comprises an upper element exterior surface 38 and an upper element interior feature 40 opposite the upper element exterior surface 40. The lower element 36 comprises a lower element exterior surface 42 and a lower element interior feature 44 opposite the lower element exterior surface 42. The upper element interior feature 40 is configured to interlock with the lower element interior feature 44. In an exemplary embodiment, the upper element exterior surface 38 and the lower element exterior surface 42 can comprise a smooth exterior surface.

(16) In an exemplary embodiment shown at FIGS. 5-7, the upper element interior feature 40 and the lower element interior feature 44 comprise inverted edges 46 along a portion or edge 48 of the upper element 34 and the lower element 36 respectively. In another exemplary embodiment, the inverted edges 46 comprise corners 56 bend into flat hooks 58 facing the interior surface for each of the upper element 34 and the lower element 36. The inverted edges 46 of the upper element 34 and the inverted edges 46 of the lower element 36 can interlock at the corners 56.

(17) In another exemplary embodiment as seen in FIG. 8, the upper element 34 can include the upper element exterior surface 38 and an upper element interior surface 62 having a feature 40 opposite the upper element exterior surface 38. The lower element 36 can include the lower element exterior surface 42 and a lower element interior surface 64 with a feature 44 opposite the lower element exterior surface 42. The upper element interior feature 40 can be configured to interlock with the lower element interior feature 44. In an exemplary embodiment, the upper element interior feature 40 can include a peg 66 extending out of a portion of the upper element interior surface 62. The lower element interior feature 44 can include a receiver 68 formed in the lower element interior surface 64

(18) The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry provides the advantage of significant aerodynamic performance improvement by morphing static engine components.

(19) The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry provides the advantage of designing an adaptive flap to assume different optimal shapes at high-power, where through-flow is important, and at partial power, where stability concerns dominate.

(20) The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry provides the advantage of shape-morphing structures that can be enablers when applied to the flow-path.

(21) The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry provides the advantage in applications with a splitter of a 3-stream fan, where changes in bypass ratio may result in excessive splitter loading.

(22) The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry provides the advantage in applications with engine components such as the variable inlet guide vane and the flow splitters that have a fixed geometry.

(23) The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry provides the advantage for adaptive structural/aerodynamic elements which can include flexible skins that can facilitate shapes which are most efficient for the different operating regimes.

(24) The morphing aerodynamic control surface geometry provides the advantage for shape-morphing structures that can be applied both to airfoils and flow-paths.

(25) There has been provided an adaptive morphing engine geometry. While the adaptive morphing engine geometry has been described in the context of specific embodiments thereof, other unforeseen alternatives, modifications, and variations may become apparent to those skilled in the art having read the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace those alternatives, modifications, and variations which fall within the broad scope of the appended claims.