PROCESS FOR DRY BENEFICIATION OF BAUXITE MINERALS BY ELECTROSTATIC SEGREGATION
20210147959 · 2021-05-20
Inventors
- Kyle P. Flynn (Moseley, VA, US)
- Abhishek Gupta (Cambridge, MA, US)
- Lucas Rojas Mendoza (Watertown, MA, US)
Cpc classification
C04B20/026
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B20/026
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B7/006
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01F7/06
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C22B21/0007
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
A tribo-electrostatic separation process for beneficiation of bauxite minerals is disclosed. The process may include one or more steps of grinding, drying, de-agglomeration, air classification and electrostatic separation.
Claims
1. A method for beneficiation of bauxite ore, comprising: providing a source of bauxite ore; drying the bauxite ore to achieve a moisture content of less than about 4.0% by weight, and preferably less than about 2.0% by weight; and separating the bauxite ore with a triboelectric electrostatic belt-type separator or belt separator system (BSS) to generate a bauxite rich concentrate which is enriched in total Al2O3 and/or available alumina, and reduced in total SiO2 and/or reactive silica, wherein the method is water-free.
2. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the source of bauxite ore is characterized by a d90 particle size of about 200 microns or less.
3. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the source of bauxite ore is characterized by a moisture content of greater than about 10% by weight.
4. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the method is carried out in a completely dry metallurgical route.
5. The method of any of the preceding claims, further comprising grinding the source of bauxite ore such that 90% of the bauxite ore particles (d90) are finer than about 200 microns.
6. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the method further comprises mechanically de-agglomerating the dried bauxite ore prior to separation using a high shear impact device, e.g. a pin mixer or a hammer mill, pin mill or rotor mill.
7. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the grinding and drying of the bauxite ore are conducted in the same apparatus, e.g. an air swept mill such as a vertical roller mill, hammer mill, pin mill or rotor mill.
8. The method according to any of the preceding claims, where the drying and mechanical de-agglomeration of the bauxite ore are conducted in the same apparatus, such as an air swept, agitated flash dryer system.
9. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the source of bauxite ore is a monohydrate or a trihydrate bauxite ore.
10. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the source of bauxite ore is a metallurgical grade bauxite ore.
11. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the source of bauxite ore is a non-metallurgical grade bauxite ore.
12. The method of any of the preceding claims, further comprising introducing the bauxite rich concentrate to an alumina refining operation or Bayer process.
13. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the separating step further generates a co-product suitable for use in the manufacturing of cement or cement clinker.
14. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the co-product does not require pretreatment to remove sodium prior to being used to manufacture cement clinker or cementitious products.
15. The method of any of the preceding claims, further comprising storing a co-product of the separating step as stackable dry tailings.
16. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the bauxite ore is beneficiated at a rate of feed greater than about 37 tons per hour per meter of electrode width.
17. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the bauxite rich concentrate is characterized by less than about 4% reactive silica by weight, e.g. about 3% reactive silica.
18. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the amount of iron present in the bauxite rich product is reduced by about 0% to about 30% on a relative basis.
19. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the amount of titania (TiO2) present in the bauxite rich product is reduced by about 0% to about 75% on a relative basis.
20. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the amount of kaolinite present in the bauxite rich product is reduced by about 0% to about 50% on a relative basis.
21. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the amount of quartz present in the bauxite rich product is reduced by about 20% to about 80% on a relative basis.
22. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein an amount of reactive silica present per unit of available alumina is reduced by about 10% to about 65% on a relative basis.
23. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein a ratio of bauxite to available alumina is decreased by between about 8% and about 27% in relative terms.
24. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein a ratio of available alumina to reactive silica in the bauxite rich product (A/S) is increased by between about 20% and about 200% in relative terms.
25. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein a ratio of bauxite to total Al2O3 is decreased by between about 2% and about 30% in relative terms.
26. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the dry, bauxite-depleted co-product from the first BSS stage is processed by a second BSS stage in a scavenging configuration in which the bauxite rich product from the secondary BSS is returned as feed to the primary BSS stage.
27. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the dry, bauxite-depleted co-product from the first BSS stage is processed by a second BSS stage in a scavenging configuration.
28. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the bauxite concentrate from the first BSS is processed by a second BSS in a cleaning configuration.
29. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the dry, bauxite-depleted co-product from the first BSS is processed by a second BSS in a scavenging configuration in which the bauxite rich product from the secondary BSS is returned as feed to the primary BSS, and in which the bauxite rich concentrate from the first BSS is processed by a second BSS in a cleaning configuration.
30. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the dry, bauxite-depleted co-product from the first BSS is processed by a second BSS in a scavenging configuration, and in which the bauxite rich concentrate from the first BSS is processed by a second BSS in a cleaning configuration.
31. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the dry, bauxite-depleted co-product from the first BSS is processed by a second BSS in a scavenging configuration in which the bauxite rich product from the secondary BSS is returned as feed to the primary BSS.
32. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the dry, bauxite-depleted co-product from the first BSS is processed by a second BSS in a scavenging configuration.
33. The method of any of the preceding claims, further comprising air classifying the processed bauxite ore to provide a fine fraction and a coarse fraction, and wherein either or both the fine fraction or the coarse fraction from the air separator classification system is processed with the BSS to generate the bauxite rich concentrate which is enriched in total Al2O3 and/or available alumina, and reduced in total SiO2 and/or reactive silica.
34. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the fine fraction is processed with the BSS to generate the bauxite rich concentrate which is enriched in total Al2O3 and/or available alumina, and reduced in total SiO2 and/or reactive silica.
35. The method of any of the preceding claims, further comprising introducing the fine fraction to at least one further air separator classification device.
36. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the coarser fraction(s) from one or more of the at least one further air classification stages preceding the final air classification stage are processed via BSS.
37. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the fine fraction from the final air classification stage is processed via BSS.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0027] The foregoing and other advantages of the application will be more fully appreciated with reference to the following drawings in which:
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0046] It is to be appreciated that embodiments of the methods and apparatuses discussed herein are not limited in application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The methods and apparatuses are capable of implementation in other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Examples of specific implementations are provided herein for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be limiting. Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use herein of “including,” “comprising,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” and variations thereof is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. References to “or” may be construed as inclusive so that any terms described using “or” may indicate any of a single, more than one, and all of the described terms.
[0047] The refining of bauxite ore by the Bayer process is the primary method of generating alumina. Bauxite ores are graded upon their available alumina content which represents the alumina that can be recovered by the Bayer process, and by their reactive silica content. High reactive silica is undesirable when refining bauxite in the Bayer process as it increases the consumption of caustic soda (NaOH), reduces the alumina available to the process, contributes to alumina losses and leads to more rejected material as alumina refinery residues (ARR) or red mud. Bauxites are generally considered high in reactive silica if they contain a reactive silica content of more than 8% by weight. Bauxite with reactive silica content above 8% is generally considered non-economic to process, and therefore is sold at a deep discount, or is considered waste.
[0048] Bauxites consist of a mixture of trihydrate minerals (gibbsite) and monohydrate minerals (boehmite and diaspore). At low leaching temperatures of 140 deg C. or less, only the gibbsite fraction of the bauxite is reactive and thus only the gibbsite content of the bauxite contributes to the available alumina. At high leaching temperatures of 180 deg C. or greater, both the trihydrate and monohydrate bauxite minerals are reactive. Bauxites can thus be considered as being suitable for low temperature processing or high temperature processing, depending on the ratio of trihydrate to monohydrate minerals contained in the bauxite. The refining temperature also determines which gangue minerals react, with kaolinite being reactive at both lower and higher temperatures, but quartz being reactive only during higher temperature refining. Reactive silica from kaolinite and quartz both contribute to caustic soda loss in the Bayer process, however, reactive silica from quartz also results in a loss of alumina during the desilication phase. Therefore, both the mineralogy and amount of the gangue minerals contained in the bauxite is of importance to the bauxite refiner, as it determines the cost of refining.
[0049] Wet processing methods of bauxite beneficiation include crushing, sieving, washing, scrubbing and dewatering of the ore. Screening and washing of bauxite ores is effective in reducing silicates for ores in which the silicates are preferentially concentrated in the finer particle size fractions, as the finer particles size fractions report to the tailings. Screening methods are not selective towards reducing silicates, and thus fine bauxite minerals are also removed as a result of the screening process. Froth flotation has been employed for certain low-grade bauxite ores, however, has not been shown to be highly selective at rejecting kaolinite. Wet processing methods are undesirable due to the large volumes of water required, the need to subsequently dewater or dry the product and the wet tailings which must be stored in tailings dams and monitored to prevent accidental release.
[0050] Water-free methods of bauxite beneficiation are limited to dry sieving to remove impurities that are segregated in a particular size fraction of the bauxite. In practice, such screening operations are limited to relatively coarse particles. The selectivity of sieving is typically low, with significant bauxite losses typically incurred. Dry sieving is effective for ores in which the silicates are preferentially concentrated in the finer particle size fractions. Magnetic separation of bauxite has been studied for selectively removing iron containing contaminants, however magnetic separation of bauxite ores has not been widely implemented in commercial operation. Magnetic separation is effective only in reducing the magnetic iron minerals from bauxite, and therefore is not selective for reducing silica which is non-magnetic. The limitations of dry magnetic separators on fine particles are well understood due to the effects of air currents, particle to particle adhesion, and particle to rotor adhesion. Fine particles are highly influenced by the movement of air currents, and thus it is not practical to sort fine particles by dry magnetic processing methods in which the particles are required to follow a trajectory imparted by the movement of the magnetic separator belt.
[0051] Electrostatic separators can be classified by the method of charging employed. The three basic types of electrostatic separators include; (1) high tension roll (HTR) ionized field separators, (2) electrostatic plate (ESP) and screen static (ESS) field separators and (3) triboelectric separators, including belt separator systems (BSS).
[0052] High tension roll (HRT) systems are unsuitable for removing silicates from bauxite ores, as both the silicates and bauxite ores are electrically insulating (i.e.—non-conductive) and therefore no driving force exists to impart a conductivity-based separation. Iron gangue minerals are electrically conductive and could in principle be separated from bauxite ores on the basis of electrical conductivity differences. However, HTR systems are limited in their ability to process fine particles and are thus not suitable for removing iron gangue minerals which are present as fine particles, as fine particles are influenced by air currents and are therefore not suitable for sorting by any means which relies on imparted momentum. In addition, HTR devices are inherently limited in the rates of fine particles they are able to process due to the requirement that each individual particle contact the drum roll. As particle size decreases, the surface area of the particles per unit of weight increases dramatically, thus reducing the effective processing rate of such devices, and making them unsuitable for processing fine particles at commercially relevant rates. In addition to these operational limitations, the fine particles that are present in the non-conducting fraction are difficult to remove from the rolls once attached, due to the strong electrostatic force relative to the mass of the particles. The limitations of such devices on fine particles include fine particles adhere to the surface of the drum, are challenging to remove and degrade the ability of the conductive particles to make contact with the drum. Therefore, such separators are not suitable for very fine bauxite ores. Electrostatic separation (ES) of bauxite ore has not been utilized in commercial application.
[0053] Belt separator systems (BSS) are used to separate the constituents of particle mixtures based on the charging of the different constituents by surface contact (i.e. the triboelectric effect). BSS offer advantages over HRT, ESP and ESS electrostatic separators including free fall or drum roll separators as they are ideally suited to processing fine materials with high throughput. BSS require that particles contain low surface moisture, be free flowing and be physically detached (ie—liberated) such that the impurities and the high value minerals are contained in separate particles.
[0054] BSS may be operated in different configurations including in multiple stages of separation to either enhance bauxite recovery or improve the grade of the bauxite mineral rich product. For example, a BSS can consist of a first stage or rougher stage separation, which generates two products, a bauxite rich mineral product or concentrate and a gangue mineral rich co-product or tailings. The tailings from the rougher stage may be subsequently processed in a second stage of BSS, called a scavenging stage, to recover additional bauxite minerals. The bauxite rich product or concentrate may also be processed in a second stage of BSS, called a cleaning stage.
[0055] Aspects and embodiments of this disclosure are directed to a water-free process for beneficiating bauxite to reduce the reactive and total silica and increase the available alumina. Advantages of this system include the eliminated need for water for processing, elimination of wet tailings produced by wet processing methods and the opportunity for reuse of the dry tailings as low-grade bauxite for cement manufacture, or other purposes. Furthermore, the system allows for beneficiation of bauxites that were previously not able to be processed due to the presence of very finely disseminated impurities which are not liberated at coarser particle sizes required for screening. Low-grade bauxite wastes or tailings from wet screening operations may be upgraded using the system described. The system is applicable for processing both metallurgical grade and non-metallurgical grade bauxites, and for both low temperature (gibbsite) bauxites, as well as high temperature bauxites which contain significant amounts of boehmite and/or diaspore.
[0056] Further advantage of the system is that it does not require high temperature calcining or roasting of the bauxite ores. The system instead requires only the removal of surface moisture by flash drying, with the temperature of the bauxite ore exiting the dryer not exceeding 150 deg C. Higher temperature drying using a rotary dryer may be desirable in some circumstances.
[0057] Aspect and embodiments of this disclosure are directed to a system of concentrating bauxite ores in a completely water-free method, as illustrated in
[0058] In another embodiment, illustrated in
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067] Additionally, the co-product fraction (356) from the cleaner secondary BSS (354) may also be returned to the primary stage BSS (352) as feed.
[0068]
[0069]
[0070]
[0071]
[0072]
[0073]
[0074]
[0075]
[0076] To attest the efficiency of the present invention, samples of bauxite ore were tested using the novel system.
Example 1
[0077] In one example, upgrading of a sample of primarily monohydrate bauxite ore was completed by a series of processing stages comprising crushing of the ore, grinding of the ore to a finely ground powder using a hammer mill, drying of the ore to remove surface moisture, and processing the ground and dried ore using a tribo-electrostatic belt separator system (BSS). Table 1 shows the particle size distribution of the sample, measured by sieving, after crushing but prior to grinding.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Weight Percent Cumulative Weight Percent Sieve (%) Retained (%) Passing +3.4 mm 53.7 46.3 −3.4 mm/+2 mm.sup. 9.5 36.8 −2.0 mm/+1.4 mm 5.2 31.6 −1.4 mm/+1.0 mm 4.4 27.2 −1.0 mm/+850 μm 1.4 25.8 −850 μm/+710 μm 2.1 23.7 −710 μm/+600 μm 1.9 21.8 −600 μm/+425 μm 4.3 17.5 −425 μm/+355 μm 2.3 15.2 −355 μm/+300 μm 1.9 13.3 −300 μm/+250 μm 1.9 11.4 −250 μm/+180 μm 2.8 8.6 −180 μm 8.6
The ore was ground using a hammermill and was subsequently dried from an initial moisture content of 2.5% to a moisture content less than 1.0%. The relative humidity (RH) of the bauxite ore feed to the BSS after drying was 46%. Table 2 shows the sample moisture, available alumina and reactive silica contents, and the sample particle size by laser diffraction measurement after grinding.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Loss on BSS Feed Particle size by laser Initial Ignition, BSS Feed Relative diffraction measurement Moisture LOI Moisture Humidity, RH D10 D50 D90 D98 (%) (%) (%) (%) (μm) (μm) (μm) (μm) Ground 2.5 15.0 <1.0 46 1 8 63 106 Sample
[0078] The major mineralogical phases of the feed sample are shown in Table 3. The sample exhibited a mineralogy typical of a monohydrate bauxite sample. The main Al2O3 recoverable mineralogical species in the sample was Diaspore and the main gangue minerals were present in the form of Hematite, Goethite, Kaolinite, Quartz and Calcite.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Mineral Chemical Formula Weight Percent (%) Gibbsite Al(OH).sub.3 3.0 Diaspore AlO(OH) 57.3 Boehmite AlO(OH) 6.4 Hematite Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 8.2 Goethite FeO(OH) 7.6 Kaolinite Al.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.5(OH).sub.4 3.0 Quartz SiO.sub.2 3.3 Anatase TiO.sub.2 2.0 Rutile TiO.sub.2 0.6 Calcite CaCO.sub.3 8.6
[0079] The material which was processed by the BSS has a D50=8 micron and a D90=63 micron. BSS separation results are shown in Table 4.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Example 1 Available Reactive Weight Al2O3 at 235 Silica at 235 Available Al2O3/ (%) deg C. (%) deg C. (%) Reactive Silica Feed 100 41.8 6.7 6.2 Concentrate 41.8 46.4 3.7 12.5 Tailings 58.2 38.5 8.8 4.4
[0080] Table 4 shows that with the system of dry particle size reduction, drying and BSS processing, it was possible to obtain a concentrate with a 3.7% reactive silica and 46.4% available alumina, an available Al2O3 over reactive silica (A/S) ratio of 12.5.
Example 2
[0081] In one example, processing of a sample of monohydrate bauxite ore was completed by a series of processing stages comprising grinding of the ore to a finely ground powder using a hammer mill, drying of the ore to remove surface moisture, and processing the ground and dried ore using a tribo-electrostatic belt separator system (BSS).
[0082] The ore was ground using a hammermill and subsequently dried. The relative humidity (RH) of the feed bauxite ore after drying was 4%.
Table 5 shows the sample moisture, available alumina and reactive silica contents, and the sample particle size by laser diffraction measurement after grinding.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Loss on Particle size by laser Ignition, BSS Feed BSS Feed diffraction measurement LOI Moisture RH D10 D50 D90 D98 (%) (%) (%) (μm) (μm) (μm) (μm) Ground 14.4 1.0 4 1 9 80 129 Sample
[0083] The major mineralogical phases of the feed sample are shown in Table 6 below. The sample exhibited a mineralogy typical of a monohydrate bauxite sample. The main Al2O3 recoverable mineralogical species in the sample was Diaspore and the main gangue minerals were present in the form of Hematite, Goethite, Kaolinite, Quartz and Calcite.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Mineral Chemical Formula Weight Percent (%) Gibbsite Al(OH).sub.3 1.7 Diaspore AlO(OH) 51.2 Boehmite AlO(OH) 12.3 Hematite Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 10.1 Goethite FeO(OH) 6.0 Kaolinite Al.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.5(OH).sub.4 4.0 Quartz SiO.sub.2 2.9 Anatase TiO.sub.2 1.7 Rutile TiO.sub.2 0.7 Calcite CaCO.sub.3 6.9 Muscovite KAl.sub.2(Si.sub.3Al)O.sub.10(OH,F).sub.2 2.1
The material which was processed by the BSS has a D50=9 micron and a D90=80 micron. BSS separation results are shown in Table 7.
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Example 2 % Available % Reactive Weight Al2O3 at 235 Silica at 235 Available Al2O3/ % deg C. deg C. Reactive Silica Feed 100 39.1 8.6 4.5 Concentrate 38.0 48.3 4.0 12.1 Tailings 62.0 33.4 11.4 2.9
Example 3
[0084] In one example, processing of a sample of trihydrate bauxite ore was completed by a series of processing stages comprising grinding of the ore to a finely ground powder, drying of the ore to remove surface moisture, processing the ground and dried ore using a tribo-electrostatic belt separator system (BSS).
[0085] Table 8 shows the sample moisture, available alumina and reactive silica contents, and the sample particle size by laser diffraction measurement after grinding. The ore was dried to a moisture content of 0.5%. The relative humidity (RH) of the feed bauxite ore after drying was 4%.
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Loss on Particle size by laser Ignition, BSS Feed diffraction measurement Moisture LOI RH D10 D50 D90 D98 (%) (%) (%) (μm) (μm) (μm) (μm) Ground 0.5 23.6 4 2 19 73 118 Sample
[0086] The major mineralogical phases of the feed sample are shown in Table 9 below. The sample exhibited a mineralogy typical of a trihydrate bauxite sample. The main Al2O3 recoverable mineralogical species in the sample was Gibbsite and the main gangue minerals were present in the form of Hematite, Goethite, Kaolinite and Quartz.
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Mineral Chemical Formula Weight Percent (%) Gibbsite Al(OH).sub.3 61.1 Hematite Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 14.9 Goethite FeO(OH) 11.0 Kaolinite Al.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.5(OH).sub.4 8.7 Quartz SiO.sub.2 1.3 Ilmenite FeTiO.sub.3 0.6 Anatase TiO.sub.2 0.8 Amorphous — 1.5
[0087] The material which was processed by the BSS has a D50=19 micron and a D90=73 micron. BSS separation results are shown in Table 10.
TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Example 3 % Available % Reactive Weight Al2O3 at 145 Silica at 145 Available Al2O3/ % deg C. deg C. Reactive Silica Feed 100 35.9 3.6 10.0 Concentrate 40 43.2 2.5 17.3 Tailings 60 31.1 4.4 7.1
Example 4
[0088] In one example, processing of a sample of trihydrate bauxite ore tailings which was collected as undersize from a traditional wet screening process was completed by a series of processing stages comprising (i) drying of the high moisture lumps (ii) crushing with a jaw crusher to break up agglomerates (iii) de-agglomerating the lumps into a fine powder and (iv) drying of the fine powder to the appropriate moisture and relative humidity level for BSS processing.
[0089] Table 11 shows the sample moisture, LOI and the sample particle size by laser diffraction measurement after grinding and de-agglomerating. The ore was dried from an initial moisture content of 26.7% to a moisture content of 0.8%. The relative humidity (RH) of the feed bauxite ore after drying was <1%.
TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Loss on BSS Feed Particle size by laser Initial Ignition, BSS Feed Relative diffraction measurement Moisture LOI Moisture Humidity, RH D10 D50 D90 D98 (%) (%) (%) (%) (μm) (μm) (μm) (μm) Ground 26.7 18.8 0.8 <1 1 7 59 93 Sample
[0090] The major mineralogical phases of the feed sample are shown in Table 12 below. The sample exhibited a mineralogy typical of a trihydrate bauxite sample. The main Al2O3 recoverable mineralogical species in the sample was Gibbsite and the main gangue minerals were present in the form of Hematite, Goethite, Kaolinite, Ilmenite and Quartz.
TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Mineral Chemical Formula Weight Percent (%) Gibbsite Al(OH).sub.3 40.7 Hematite Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 4.2 Goethite FeO(OH) 17.4 Kaolinite Al.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.5(OH).sub.4 10.9 Quartz SiO.sub.2 19.0 Ilmenite FeTiO.sub.3 5.8 Anatase TiO.sub.2 1.0 Zircon ZrSiO4 1.0
[0091] The material which was processed by the BSS has a D50=7 micron and a D90=59 micron. BSS separation results are shown in Table 13.
TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Example 4 % Available % Reactive Weight Al2O3 at 145 Silica at 145 Available Al2O3/ % deg C. deg C. Reactive Silica Feed 100 24.1 5.0 4.8 Concentrate 43.3 32.6 3.6 9.1 Tailings 56.7 17.6 6.0 2.9
Example 5
[0092] In one example, processing of a sample of trihydrate bauxite ore was completed by a series of processing stages comprising grinding of the ore to a finely ground powder, drying of the ore to remove surface moisture, processing the ground and dried ore using a tribo-electrostatic belt separator system (BSS).
[0093] Table 14 shows the sample moisture, available alumina and reactive silica contents, and the sample particle size by laser diffraction measurement after grinding. The ore was dried from an initial moisture content of 1.0% to a moisture content of 0.8%. The relative humidity (RH) of the feed bauxite ore after drying was <1%.
TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Loss on BSS Feed Particle size by laser Initial Ignition, BSS Feed Relative diffraction measurement Moisture LOI Moisture Humidity, RH D10 D50 D90 D98 (%) (%) (%) (%) (μm) (μm) (μm) (μm) Ground 1.0 22.7 0.8 <1 1 8 67 98 Sample
[0094] The major mineralogical phases of the feed sample are shown in Table 15 below. The sample exhibited a mineralogy typical of a trihydrate bauxite sample. The main Al2O3 recoverable mineralogical species in the sample was Gibbsite and the main gangue minerals were present in the form of Hematite, Goethite, Kaolinite and Quartz.
TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Mineral Chemical Formula Weight Percent (%) Gibbsite Al(OH).sub.3 58.9 Hematite Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 1.6 Goethite FeO(OH) 6.1 Kaolinite Al.sub.2Si.sub.2O.sub.5(OH).sub.4 4.4 Quartz SiO.sub.2 24.7 Ilmenite FeTiO.sub.3 1.9 Zircon ZrSiO.sub.4 0.8 Amorphous — 1.5
[0095] The material which was processed by the BSS has a D50=8 micron and a D90=67 micron. BSS separation results are shown in Table 16.
TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Example 5 % Available % Reactive Weight Al2O3 at 145 Silica at 145 Available Al2O3/ % deg C. deg C. Reactive Silica Feed 100 38.6 3.7 10.4 Concentrate 28.6 50.2 3.8 13.2 Tailings 71.4 34.0 3.6 8.6
[0096] Having thus described certain embodiments of a system for beneficiation of bauxite ore; various alterations, modifications and improvements will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such alterations, variations and improvements are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the application. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example and is not intended to be limiting. The application is limited only as defined in the following claims and the equivalents thereto.