Corrosion inhibition

Abstract

A corrosion inhibiting compound with a general structure A-B or A-X-B for inhibition of corrosion of steel in acidic solution. A comprises a heterocyclic ring system having a plurality of cyclic Carbon atoms and at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom, wherein the at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom is neutral under neutral conditions and protonatable under acidic conditions. B comprises at least two unsaturated Carbon atoms. B may comprise a ring system or a polymerisable group.

Claims

1. A corrosion inhibiting compound with a general structure A-B, wherein A comprises a heterocyclic ring system comprising a plurality of cyclic Carbon atoms and at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom, wherein the at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom is neutral under neutral conditions and protonatable under acidic conditions; wherein B comprises at least two unsaturated Carbon atoms; and wherein at least one of: A is tetrahydroquinoline; B comprises a homocyclic ring system; B comprises two or three fused rings; or B comprises a plurality of aromatic rings; or B is naphthyl.

2. The corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 1, wherein A and B are connected via a linking Nitrogen atom, the linking Nitrogen atom being one of the at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom in A.

3. The corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 1, wherein A and B are connected directly or via X, and wherein X comprises one or more Carbon atoms.

4. The corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 3, wherein X is methylene.

5. The corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 1, wherein A comprises one or two or three rings.

6. The corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 1, wherein A comprises two or three fused rings.

7. The corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 6, wherein at least one of the fused rings is aromatic.

8. The corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 1, wherein B comprises a polymerisable group.

9. The corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 1, further comprising a polymerisable group attached to A and/or B.

10. A method of inhibiting corrosion of a metal surface exposed to an acidic solution comprising including in the solution a corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 1.

11. A method of using a corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 1 comprising adding the corrosion inhibiting compound to minimize corrosion of metal surfaces in acidic solutions.

12. A method of using a corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 1 comprising including the corrosion inhibitor compound in an oil and gas industry application.

13. A method of using a corrosion inhibiting compound according to claim 1 comprising adding the corrosion inhibiting compound to water.

14. A corrosion inhibiting compound with a general structure A-B, wherein A comprises a heterocyclic ring system comprising a plurality of cyclic Carbon atoms and at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom, wherein the at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom is neutral under neutral conditions and protonatable under acidic conditions; wherein A comprises two or three fused rings; wherein at least one of the fused rings is fully saturated; and wherein B comprises at least two unsaturated Carbon atoms.

15. A corrosion inhibiting compound with a general structure A-B, wherein A comprises a heterocyclic ring system comprising a plurality of cyclic Carbon atoms and at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom, wherein the at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom is neutral under neutral conditions and protonatable under acidic conditions; wherein B comprises at least two unsaturated Carbon atoms; wherein A and B are connected via a linking Nitrogen atom, the linking Nitrogen atom being one of the at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom in A; and wherein one or more of the plurality of cyclic Carbon atoms in A is directly connected to the linking Nitrogen atom and the one or more of the plurality of cyclic Carbon atoms is saturated.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a graph showing weight loss results in example 1 below using duplex stainless steel 22Cr125.

(2) FIG. 2 is a graph showing weight loss results in example 1 below using HS80 coiled tubing.

(3) FIG. 3 is a bar chart showing weight loss results in example 1 below using 13Cr80 Casing Material.

(4) FIG. 4 is a bar chart showing comparison weight loss results in example 11 below.

(5) FIG. 5 is molecular modelling results in example 12 below.

(6) FIG. 6 is electrochemistry experiment results in example 13 below.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(7) The current use of corrosion inhibitor products involves the addition of a certain concentration or dosage of the inhibitor product to a corrosive fluid. The physico-chemical properties of the corrosive fluids vary according to the application and prevailing wellbore and reservoir conditions. The corrosive fluid may comprise (i) a treatment fluid injected from surface via the wellbore into the formation such as a matrix acidizing fluid or an acid fracturing fluid, (ii) a fluid injected into the reservoir to improve or enhance the recovery of hydrocarbons (IOR/EOR applications) or (iii) produced fluids (multiphase) flowing from the reservoir to surface via the wellbore. Such injection and production operations expose a broad range of tubing, casing and downhole equipment to a wide range of different corrosive fluid compositions. This tubing, casing and downhole equipment is largely composed of carbon steels and low and high alloys. Exposure times vary from a few hours in the case of low volume matrix acidizing stimulation treatments to months or years in the case of reservoir conformance fluids and produced fluids. It is known that the efficiency of corrosion inhibitor products depends on the composition and microstructure of the metal or alloy substrate. Details pertaining to any given application dictate the nature of the exposed metal/alloy type(s), the composition and properties of the corrosive fluid, the range of exposure times and the prevailing physico-chemical conditions including temperature, pressure, oxygen concentration and the presence and concentration of acid gases, CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2S.

(8) For any given application, laboratory corrosion tests on suitable test coupons of the relevant metal and alloy types are used to identify a suitable inhibitor chemistry/product and the dosage required to reduce the rate of corrosion to an “acceptable” level. In general, this “acceptable” level is defined by (i) a maximum generalized corrosion rate, i.e. a maximum cumulative weight loss per unit area recorded after a relevant exposure period and (ii) a maximum degree of localized corrosion as specified by a maximum “pitting index”. Typically, the minimum dosage of the corrosion inhibitor used in the application is the dosage required to achieve “acceptable” levels of generalized and localized corrosion. Such “acceptable” levels of corrosion are application-specific.

(9) In matrix acidizing, the test coupons are usually fabricated from various coiled tubing and wellbore casing materials with a surface area of 25-30 cm.sup.2. In this case, the typical “acceptable” level of generalized corrosion is ≤0.05 lb/ft.sup.2, and preferably ≤0.01 lb/ft.sup.2, as determined after an exposure period matched to that which will be encountered in the application. Typically, the cumulative weight loss and pitting index (PI) of coiled tubing test coupons is determined after exposure periods in the range 3-48 hours. Typically, the “acceptable” level of localized corrosion is defined by a maximum PI=2 and, more preferably, by the absence of any pits (PI=0).

(10) In produced fluid applications, a range of different laboratory tests are performed and typical “acceptable” corrosion rates as determined by linear polarization resistance (LPR) or electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) are millimetres/year (as determined by tests lasting 10-30 days).

(11) LPR measurement was first proposed by M Stern and A L Geary in “Electrochemical Polarization: I. A Theoretical Analysis of the Shape of Polarization Curves” in J. Electrochem. Soc. Vol 104 pp 56-63 (1957) and followed by Stern: “A Method For Determining Corrosion Rates From Linear Polarization Data” in Corrosion, Vol. 14, No. 9, 1958, pp 440-444. In such tests a piece of the steel is used as an electrode and this electrode may be kept moving as a rotating disc, cylinder or cage to simulate flow of the corrosive solution over the steel.

(12) EIS can be used to monitor the corrosion rate of a system. The parameter of interest is the charge transfer resistance, R.sub.ct, which can be thought of the ‘resistance’ to corrosion. A metal test piece is used as the working electrode in a three-electrode electrochemical cell with the corrosive solution as electrolyte. Impedance data is obtained by applying a small alternating voltage to the working electrode and measuring the resulting current to obtain a value of impedance. This is done at a range of frequencies. Then, in order to extract the parameter of interest, the metal/inhibitor/electrolyte interfaces are modelled as an electrical equivalent circuit and the theoretical impedance is fitted to the data.

(13) The extent to which such laboratory tests simulate the physico-chemical conditions prevailing in a given application is a topic which has been the subject of many publications. Several physico-chemical variables (temperature, pressure, oxygen concentration and the presence and concentration of acid gases, CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2S) are well controlled in typical laboratory tests. However, it is also desirable to test inhibition efficiency under dynamic flow conditions preferably matched to those which will be encountered during field treatments. It is thus important to design tests which also consider several other critical variables; these include: realistic flow conditions, i.e. representative Reynold's numbers and wall shear stresses for corrosive fluid flow in contact with the internal or external surface of relevant tubing or internal surface of casing; realistic temperature history conditions, e.g. heat-up profiles for injected fluids; realistic presence and concentration of solids in produced fluids, e.g. reservoir sanding conditions, and associated erosion-corrosion conditions including a representative range of solid particle impingement velocities; and/or realistic presence, concentration and composition of non-aqueous phases and other additives, e.g. gas hydrate inhibitors, asphaltene inhibitors and demulsifiers, in production chemical mixtures.

(14) The present disclosure is concerned with a corrosion inhibition compound with a general structure A-B or A-X-B. This disclosure is also concerned with the use of such compounds as corrosion inhibitors in a corrosive solution, in particular in a corrosive acidic aqueous solution. Surfaces to be protected from corrosion will ordinarily be metallic and the metal may be an alloy. In some embodiments, such a compound is included in an inhibitor composition which is used to protect a system in which there are a plurality of metals which come into contact with corrosive aqueous acidic liquid. The metal surfaces to be protected may be steel and the steel may be a single phase steel or a duplex alloy steel. An alloy steel may contain nickel, chromium, molybdenum and possibly other alloying metals. The metals may be located within a subterranean borehole.

(15) Substructure A

(16) Sub-structure A comprises a heterocyclic ring system having a plurality of cyclic Carbon atoms and at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom. Optionally, at least two of the plurality of cyclic Carbon atoms are saturated. In other words, sub-structure A may comprise at least two non-aromatic carbons such that its overall H/C ratio is unity or greater. Alternatively, the heterocyclic ring system of substructure A may be fully unsaturated or fully saturated.

(17) The heterocyclic ring system of Sub-structure A comprises one or more cyclic Nitrogen atoms which are not positively charged but which protonate in acidic solutions to provide solubility. Thus, for example, 1-(naphthyl methyl 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline (NMHQ) protonates in acid solution as shown below:

(18) ##STR00001##

(19) The heterocyclic ring system of Sub-structure A may contain one cyclic Nitrogen atom that's neutral under neutral conditions. The heterocyclic ring system may contain two or three fused rings. Each ring may be made of six cyclic Carbon atoms, for example:

(20) ##STR00002##

(21) The heterocyclic ring system of Sub-structure A may contain one cyclic Nitrogen atom that's neutral under neutral conditions. The heterocyclic ring system may contain a plurality of fused rings. Some of the rings may be made of five cyclic Carbon atoms, for example:

(22) ##STR00003##

(23) The heterocyclic ring system may contain a single ring containing one cyclic Nitrogen atom that's neutral under neutral conditions. The ring may be made of five or six cyclic Carbon atoms, for example:

(24) ##STR00004##

(25) The heterocyclic ring system may contain more than one cyclic Nitrogen atom that's neutral under neutral conditions. The ring system may contain a single ring or a plurality of fused rings, for example:

(26) ##STR00005##

(27) The heterocyclic ring system may also contain another hetero atom in addition to one or more cyclic Nitrogen atom that's neutral under neutral conditions, for example:

(28) ##STR00006##
Substructure B

(29) Sub-structure B comprises at least two unsaturated Carbon atoms. B may comprise a homocyclic ring system having a plurality of cyclic Carbon atoms. The ring system may comprise two or three fused or linked rings. The rings may be aromatic, for example:

(30) ##STR00007##

(31) The homocyclic ring system of B may comprise saturated Carbon atoms. For example:

(32) ##STR00008##

(33) In summary, preferred substructure B include benzyl, naphthyl, naphthyl methyl, fused aromatic right structures or mixed aliphatic and aromatic ring structures.

(34) Sub-structure B may comprise one or more polymerisable groups containing at least one double or triple bonded Carbon atom, for example —C(OH)—C≡CH, C≡C—, and/or —C≡N. Such a polymerisable group is intended to polymerise with other polymerisable groups after adsorption onto a metal surface, and this enables the molecules to combine together as a protective film which enhances acid corrosion inhibition.

(35) Linking Structure X

(36) Sub-structure A and sub-structure B can be connected directly via a covalent bond. An example of such an acid corrosion inhibitor is as follows:

(37) ##STR00009##

(38) Alternatively, A and B can be connected via a linking group X. The general structure of the acid corrosion inhibitor becomes A-X-B.

(39) The linking group X may be a saturated Carbon chain comprising one or two Carbon atoms. In principle, X can also be a longer Carbon chain, linear or branched, fully saturated or partially unsaturated, aliphatic or aromatic.

(40) Specific possibilities for a linking group X joining A and B are a saturated polymethylene chain
—(CH.sub.2).sub.n—
an unsaturated alkylene chain, i.e. a chain of aliphatic carbon atoms with at least one olefinic double bond in the chain such as
—CH.sub.2—CH═CH—CH.sub.2—
and a mixed aliphatic aromatic chain in which two aliphatic groups are connected by an aromatic ring, such as

(41) ##STR00010##

(42) Furthermore, the linking group may also comprise one or more hetero atoms either attached to the main chain of X or as part of the main chain of X, as is the case in the below examples:

(43) ##STR00011##

(44) A comprises a heterocyclic ring system having at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom. A and B may be linked directly or indirectly via one of the at least one cyclic Nitrogen atom of A. This is not essential. Optionally, A can be linked via one of its constituent Carbon atoms.

(45) Additional Attachments

(46) In addition, one or more of the rings in sub-structure A and/or sub-structure B may have one or more additional groups attached which are intended to enhance adsorption onto a metal surface or provide an additional function:

(47) ##STR00012##

(48) For instance, the substructure A below, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-quinoline, could have an additional polymerisable group attached to one of its rings, as illustrated below:

(49) ##STR00013##

(50) Alternatively or additionally, other groups could be substituents on substructure A and/or B. These may enhance chemisorption.

EXPERIMENTS

(51) Experiments were carried out with coupons of the following steels: 22Cr125 also designated 2205, a duplex alloy steel which is an iron-chromium-nickel-molybdenum alloy, used (among other things) to fabricate casing. HS80™ (TradeMark of TENARIS), a low carbon steel used to fabricate coiled tubing. N80, a medium carbon steel used to fabricate borehole casing. 13Cr80, an alloy steel containing 13 wt % chromium without nickel, also used to fabricate borehole casing.

Example 1: NMTHQ

(52) ##STR00014##
NMTHQ Synthesis:

(53) ##STR00015##

(54) 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydroquinoline (1) (9.94 g, 74.6 mmol), 1-(chloromethyl)naphthalene (2) (11.87 g, 67.2 mmol) and potassium carbonate (22 g, 159 mmol) were heated in dimethylformamide at 85° C. for 19 hr. The suspension was cooled, the solid filtered and washed with dimethylformamide. Diethyl ether and water were added to the filtrate; the organic phase was removed, extracted with water, evaporated and the resultant solid washed with diethyl ether to give 1-(naphthalen-1-ylmethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline (3), 14.3 g (78% yield) which was used without further purification.

(55) Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency Tests on Metal Surfaces

(56) (1) Metal Type: Duplex Stainless Steel 22Cr125 Casing (2205 b6); 4 mol/L HCl, T=80° C., 3 Hours Exposure

(57) TABLE-US-00001 Concentration NMTHQ (273.37 g/mol) Weight Loss Wt % mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Pitting Index 0.11 4.02 0.0453 0.2212 4 0.1913 7.00 0.0216 0.1055 3 0.30 10.97 0.0091 0.0444 0 0.547 20.01 0.0081 0.0395 0 Concn. 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline Weight Loss Wt % mmol/L lb/ft2 kg/m2 Pitting Index 0.1465 11.00 0.6383 3.1165 6 Concentration NMQCl (305.8 g/mol) Weight Loss Wt % mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Pitting Index 0.123 4.03 0.0360 0.1758 4 0.322 10.54 0.0131 0.0640 0 0.612 20.00 0.0081 0.0395 0 Concn. Quinoline Weight Loss Wt % mmol/L lb/ft2 Wt % Pitting Index 0.1421 11.00 0.4517 0.1465 6

(58) The above data and graph in FIG. 1 show that when compared at equivalent molar concentrations, the inhibition performance of NMTHQ is very similar to the known acid corrosion inhibitor NMQCl. Data showing the relatively poor acid inhibition performance of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline and quinoline are also shown for comparison.

(59) It is also noted that when compared at equivalent weight percentages, NMTHQ is more efficient due to its lower molecular weight (NMTHQ 273.37 g/mol; NMQCl 305.8 g/mol).

(60) In addition, as detailed below, relative to NMQCl, a significant additional performance benefit given by the use of NMTHQ is that it deprotonates under near neutral pH conditions leading to negligible solubility and aquatic toxicity. Thus, the aquatic toxicity due to any NMTHQ present in acidizing flowback fluids is negligible.

(61) (2) Metal Type: N80 Casing, 4 mol/L HCl, T=80° C., 3 Hours Exposure

(62) TABLE-US-00002 Concentration NMTHQ (273.37 g/mol) Weight Loss Wt % mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Pitting Index 0.3000 10.97 0.0033 0.0161 0 0.3013 11.02 0.0052 0.0254 0 0.3017 11.04 0.0062 0.0303 0 0.2065 7.55 0.0087 0.0425 2 0.1368 5.00 0.0174 0.0850 3 Concentration NMQCl (305.8 g/mol) Weight Loss Wt % mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Pitting Index 0.3386 11.07 0.0085 0.0415 0 0.3394 11.10 0.0055 0.0269 0 0.1534 5.02 0.0129 0.0630 3

(63) The N80 data show that when compared at equivalent molar concentrations, the inhibition performance of NMTHQ is similar to the known acid corrosion inhibitor NMQCl.

(64) It is noted that when compared at equivalent weight percentages, NMTHQ is more efficient due to its lower molecular weight (NMTHQ 273.37 g/mol; NMQCl 305.8 g/mol).

(65) (3) Metal Type: HS80 Coiled Tubing; 4 mol/L HCl, T=80° C., 3 Hours Exposure

(66) TABLE-US-00003 Concentration NMTHQ (273.37 g/mol) Weight Loss Wt % mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Pitting Index 0.0055 0.20 0.4222 2.0614 5 0.0273 1.00 0.1235 0.6030 2 0.11 4.02 0.0225 0.1099 0 0.1366 5.00 0.0193 0.0942 0 0.192 7.02 0.0070 0.0342 0 Concentration NMQCl (305.8 g/mol) Weight Loss Wt % mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Pitting Index 0.0015 0.05 0.4411 2.1536 5 0.06225 2.04 0.0445 0.2173 0 0.1531 5.01 0.0165 0.0806 0 0.3366 11.01 0.0010 0.0049 0

(67) The above data are shown in a plotted graph in FIG. 2.

(68) The HS80 data show that when compared at equivalent molar concentrations, the inhibition performance of NMTHQ is similar to the known acid corrosion inhibitor, NMQCl.

(69) It is again noted that when compared at equivalent weight percentages, NMTHQ is more efficient due to its lower molecular weight (NMTHQ 273.37 g/mol; NMQCl 305.8 g/mol).

(70) (4) Metal Type: 13Cr80 Casing Material; 4 mol/L HCl, T=80° C., 3 Hours Exposure

(71) TABLE-US-00004 Concentration NMTHQ (273.37 g/mol) Weight Loss Wt % mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Pitting Index 0.3000 10.97 0.0018 0.0088 0 0.1367 5.00 0.0366 0.1787 4 Concentration NMQCl (305.8 g/mol) Weight Loss Wt % mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Pitting Index 0.3466 11.33 0.0124 0.0605 0 0.1545 5.05 0.0497 0.2427 5

(72) The 13Cr80 data above and plotted graph in FIG. 3 show that when compared at equivalent molar concentrations, the inhibition performance of NMTHQ is superior to the known acid corrosion inhibitor, NMQCl.

(73) (5) NMTHQ Performance in Presence of Potassium Iodide

(74) TABLE-US-00005 Concentration NMTHQ Concn. Weight (273.37 g/mol) KI Loss Pitting Metal type Wt % mmol/L mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Index 2205 (b6) 0.11 4.02 0 0.0453 0.2212 4 2205 (b6) 0.11 4.02 10 0.0048 0.0234 0 2205 (b5) 0.1367 5.00 0 0.0242 0.1182 4 2205 (b5) 0.1368 5.00 20 0.0022 0.0107 0 2205 (b5) 0 0 10 0.2621 1.2800 5 2205 (b5) 0 0 20 0.1326 0.6474 5 HS80 0.1366 5.00 0 0.0193 0.0942 0 HS80 0.1366 5.00 10 0.0022 0.0107 0 HS80 0 0 10 0.1664 0.8124 2 N80 0.1368 5.00 0 0.0174 0.0850 3 N80 0.1389 5.08 10 0.0033 0.0161 0 N80 0 0 10 0.1850 0.9032 5 13Cr80 0.1367 5.00 0 0.0366 0.1787 4 13Cr80 0.1382 5.06 10 0.0035 0.0171 0 !3Cr80 0 0 10 0.7527 3.6750 5

(75) The acid inhibition performance of NMTHQ is greatly enhanced by addition of adsorption intensifiers containing iodide. For example, as shown in the above table, for all four metal/alloy types, the performance of 4.0-5.7 mmol/L NMTHQ is enhanced by the addition of 5-20 mmol/L potassium iodide. Control experiments show relatively low inhibition efficiencies given by equivalent concentrations of potassium iodide in the absence of NMTHQ.

(76) When the NMTHQ concentration is 4.0-5.1 mmol/L, the addition of 10 mM potassium iodide reduces the weight loss for 2205 (b6), HS80, N80 and 13Cr80 by the factors 9.4, 8.8, 5.3 and 10.5, respectively.

(77) It is known that adsorption intensifiers such as potassium iodide greatly enhance the performance of various cationic acid corrosion inhibitors including NMQCl. The data shown in the above table are consistent with the presence of the protonated form of NMTHQ, i.e. species (B) shown in the below reaction, and its response to iodide.

(78) ##STR00016##

(79) Adsorption of the protonated species (B) is enhanced by potassium iodide.

Example 2: NMTHisoQ

(80) ##STR00017##

(81) The second example of this disclosure, NMTHisoQ, is an isomer of NMTHQ (example 1)

(82) NMTisoQ Synthesis:

(83) Similarly, NMTHisoQ is prepared by reaction of tetrahydro iso-quinoline (1) with 1-(chloromethyl)naphthalene (2):

(84) ##STR00018##
Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency Tests on Metal Surfaces

(85) The acid inhibition performance of NMTHisoQ was evaluated for Duplex stainless steel 2205 casing immersed in 4 mol/L HCl, T=80° C., 3 hours exposure—the results are given below:

(86) TABLE-US-00006 Concentration NMTHisoQ Concn. Weight (273.37 g/mol) KI Loss Pitting Metal type Wt % mmol/L mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Index 2205 (b5) 0.1367 5.00 0 0.0239 0.1167 1 2205 (b5) 0.1366 5.00 20 0.0025 0.0122 0 2205 (b5) 0 0 20 0.1326 0.6474 5

(87) As shown above, NMTHisoQ exhibits a high acid inhibition efficiency which, in the presence or absence of potassium iodide is similar to its isomer, NMTHQ.

Example 3: NMDHQ

(88) ##STR00019##

(89) Relative to the structure of NMTHQ (example 1) and NMTHisoQ (example 2), NMDHQ incorporates additional hydrogen atoms leading to the presence of 9 saturated carbons in the quinoline sub-structure. As for NMTHQ and NMTHisoQ, NMDHQ converts to the protonated form under acid conditions—this reversible process leads to good acid solubility, good acid inhibition performance and insolubility and thus low toxicity under neutral pH conditions.

(90) NMDHQ Synthesis:

(91) ##STR00020##

(92) Decahydroquinoline comprising a mixture of cis and trans stereoisomers (1) (2.31 g, 8.27 mmol), 1-(chloromethyl)naphthalene (2) (2.64 g, 14.94 mmol) and potassium carbonate (4.95 g, 35.8 mmol) were added to dimethylformamide (21 ml) and heated at 90° C. for 18 hrs. The suspension was cooled, solid filtered and washed with dimethylformamide. Water was added to the filtrate and extracted with diethyl ether. The organic phase was backwashed with water, dried over sodium sulfate and the solvent removed. The residue was purified by column chromatography eluting with 0-5% ethyl acetate in hexane to give 1-(naphthalen-1-ylmethyl)decahydroquinoline (3), 3.64 g, (87% yield).

(93) Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency Tests on Metal Surfaces

(94) As shown by the data in the below table, NMDHQ is also an efficient acid corrosion inhibitor and its efficiency is enhanced by the presence of potassium iodide.

(95) TABLE-US-00007 Concentration Concn. Weight NMDHQ KI Loss Pitting Metal type Wt % mmol/L mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Index 2205 (b8) 0.3088 11.05 0 0.0294 0.1435 1 N80 0.3068 10.98 0 0.0099 0.0483 0 13Cr 0.3094 11.07 0 0.0177 0.0864 2 HS80 0.3061 10.95 0 0.0214 0.1045 2 2205 (b8) 0.1414 5.0 10 0.0086 0.0420 0 2205 (b8) 0.1414 5.0 20 0.0034 0.0166 0

Example 4: 4aR-8aS-NMDHQ

(96) ##STR00021##

(97) 4aR-8aS-NMDHQ is the trans stereoisomer of NMDHQ (example 3).

(98) As described for NMTHQ, NMTHisoQ and NMDHQ, 4aR-8aS-NMDHQ converts to the protonated form under acid conditions—this reversible process leads to good acid solubility, good acid inhibition performance and insolubility and low toxicity under neutral pH conditions.

(99) 4aR-8aS-NMDHQ Synthesis:

(100) ##STR00022##

(101) trans-Decahydroquinoline (1) (1.73 g, 12.4 mmol), 1-(chloromethyl)naphthalene (2) (1.98 g, 11.2 mmol) and potassium carbonate (3.72 g, 26.9 mmol) were added to dimethylformamide (16 ml) and heated at 90° C. for 18 hrs. The suspension was cooled, solid filtered and washed with dimethylformamide. Water was added to the filtrate and extracted with diethyl ether. The organic phase was dried over magnesium sulfate and the solvent removed. The residue was purified by column chromatography eluting with 0-5% ethyl acetate in hexane to give (4aR,8aS)-1-naphthalen-1-ylmethyl)decahydroquinoline (3), 2.73 g, (78% yield).

(102) Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency Tests on Metal Surfaces

(103) As shown by the data in the below table, 4aR-8aS-NMDHQ is also an efficient acid corrosion inhibitor.

(104) TABLE-US-00008 Concentration 4aR-8aS- Concn. Weight NMDHQ KI Loss Pitting Metal type Wt % mmol/L mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Index 2205 (b8) 0.3095 11.08 0 0.0247 0.1206 1 N80 0.3098 11.09 0 0.0190 0.0928 1 13Cr 0.3076 11.01 0 0.0279 0.1362 2 HS80 0.3087 11.05 0 0.0349 0.1704 2

Example 5: NTHQ

(105) ##STR00023##

(106) The structure of NTHQ differs from NMTHQ (Example 1) in that the naphthyl group is directly linked to the nitrogen in the quinoline sub-structure.

(107) NTHQ Synthesis:

(108) ##STR00024##

(109) Bis(dibenzylideneacetone)palladium (54 mg) and BINAP (75 mg) were added to toluene and the suspension purged with nitrogen for about 10 mins. Sodium tert-butoxide (262 mg, 2.7 mmol), 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline (1) (390 mg, 2.9 mmol) and 1-bromonaphthalene (2) (303 mg, 1.46 mmol) were added and the mixture heated at reflux for 4 hr. The catalyst was filtered, washed with ethyl acetate, the filtrate evaporated and the residue purified by column chromatography eluted with 0-3% ethyl acetate in hexane to give 1-(naphthalen-1-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline (3), 344 mg (90% yield).

(110) Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency Tests on Metal Surfaces

(111) NTHQ is significantly less soluble than NMTHQ in hydrochloric acid solutions. As a result, a surfactant is required to solubilise NTHQ for corrosion testing purposes. The surfactant used in this example is P2393, a polyoxyethylene tridecyl ether, C.sub.13H.sub.27(OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2).sub.nOH, where n=10.

(112) As shown by the data in the below table, whilst NTHQ is an example of the generic structures covered by this disclosure, its performance is inferior to that of NMTHQ.

(113) TABLE-US-00009 Structure and Concentration of Weight inhibitor Loss Pitting Metal type Type mmol/L Additive lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Index 2205 (b5) NTHQ 11.00 P2393, 0.2188 1.0683 3 0.5 wt % HS80 NTHQ 11.00 P2393, 0.0860 0.4199 1 0.5 wt % 2205 (b6) NMTHQ 10.97 — 0.0091 0.0444 0 HS80 NMTHQ 7.02 — 0.0070 0.0342 0

Example 6: NCOTHQ

(114) ##STR00025##

(115) The structure of NCOTHQ differs from NMTHQ (Example 1) in that the naphthyl group is attached to the nitrogen in the quinoline sub-structure via a methanone group.

(116) NCOTHQ Synthesis:

(117) ##STR00026##

(118) 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydroquinoline (1) (2.33 g, 17.5 mmol) and di-isopropylethylamine (3.95 g, 30.6 mmol) were dissolved in THF (30 ml) and 1-naphthoyl chloride (2) (2.78 g, 14.6 mmol) added portion wise over ˜2 mins. The mixture was stirred for 3 hr, the precipitated solid filtered and washed with ethyl acetate. The filtrated was extracted with 1M sodium hydroxide, water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and the solvent removed. The resultant solid was triturated with diethyl ether, solid filtered and washed with diethyl ether and dried to give (3,4-dihydroquinolin-1(2H)-yl)(naphthalene-1-yl)methanone (3), 2.36 g (56% yield).

(119) Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency Tests on Metal Surfaces

(120) NCOTHQ is significantly less soluble than NMTHQ in hydrochloric acid solutions. As a result, a surfactant is required to solubilise NTHQ for corrosion testing purposes. As for example 5 (NTHQ), the surfactant used to solubilise NCOTHQ is P2393, a polyoxyethylene tridecyl ether, C.sub.13H.sub.27(OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2).sub.nOH, where n=10. Whilst NCOTHQ is an example of the range of structures covered by this disclosure, its acid inhibition performance, in the presence of the solubilising surfactant P2393, is similar to NTHQ (Example 5), i.e. it is an inferior acid corrosion inhibitor as compared to NMTHQ.

Example 7: NMI

(121) ##STR00027##

(122) Example 7 (NMI) is the naphthyl methyl derivative of indoline as distinct from the equivalent naphthyl methyl derivatives of tetrahydroquinoline (example 1), tetrahydroisoquinoline (example 2) and decahydroquinoline (examples 3 and 4). Similarly, the above structure converts to the protonated form under acid conditions and this reversible process leads to good acid solubility and insolubility (and low toxicity) under neutral pH conditions.

(123) NMI Synthesis:

(124) ##STR00028##

(125) Indoline (1) (1.47 g 12.3 mmol), 1-(chloromethyl)naphthalene (2) (1.98 g, 11.2 mmol) and potassium carbonate (3.72 g, 26.9 mmol) were combined in dimethylformamide (15 ml) and heated at 90° C. for 16 hr. The suspension was cooled, solid filtered, and washed with dimethylformamide. Water was added to the filtrate and extracted with diethyl ether. The organic phase was backwashed with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and the solvent removed. The product was purified by column chromatography eluted with 5% ethyl acetate/hexane to give 1-(naphthalen-1-ylmethyl)indoline (3), 2.22 g (76% yield).

(126) Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency Tests on Metal Surfaces

(127) As shown below, NMI is a highly efficient acid corrosion inhibitor on the Duplex stainless steel 2205 and its performance is enhanced by the presence of intensifier potassium iodide.

(128) TABLE-US-00010 Concentration of NMI Concn Weight inhibitor KI Loss Pitting Metal type Wt % mmol/L mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Index 2205 (b9) 0.1304 5.03 0 0.0477 0.2329 3 2205 (b9) 0.1308 5.04 20 0.0026 0.0127 0

Example 8: HINNME

(129) ##STR00029##

(130) Example 8 (HINNME) is a naphthyl methyl derivative of the monoamine alkaloid tryptamine. In this case, the primary amine group within the tryptamine sub-structure is reacted with 1-naphthaldehyde. The product incorporates two nitrogen atoms each of which can be protonated in acid to enhance solubility and corrosion inhibition efficiency.

(131) HINNME Synthesis:

(132) ##STR00030##

(133) Tryptamine (1) (2.3 g, 14.3 mmol) was added portion wise to a solution of naphthaldehyde (2) (2.94 g, 18.8 mmol) in methanol (25 ml) at 5° C. The solution was stirred at ambient temperature for 4 hr, solid filtered and washed with methanol. The solution was suspended in methanol and sodium borohydride (0.5 g, 13.2 mmol) added portionwise over 20 mins with cooling. The mixture was stirred overnight and solvent removed. The residue was partitioned between ethyl acetate and saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, the organic phase was removed washed sequentially with and saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and the solvent removed. The material was applied to a silica gel column and eluted with 5-10% (2M ammonia in methanol/dichloromethane)/dichloromethane to give 2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-N-(naphthalene-1-ylmethyl)ethan-1-amine (3), 3.65 g (84%).

(134) Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency Tests on Metal Surfaces

(135) TABLE-US-00011 Concentration of HINNME Concn Weight inhibitor* KI Loss Pitting Metal type Wt % mmol/L mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Index 2205 (b9) 0.1542 5.13 0 0.0299 0.1460 2 2205 (b9) 0.1500 4.99 20 0.0034 0.0166 0

(136) It is noted that in both tests, 5 mL of the mutual solvent ethylene glycol butyl ether (2-butoxyethanol) was also added to the 200 mL 4 mol/L HCl solution in order to enhance the solubility of the inhibitor HINNME.

Example 9: NMHIE

(137) ##STR00031##

(138) Example 9 (NMHIE) is a naphthyl methyl derivative of the monoamine alkaloid tryptamine but in this case, the nitrogen within indolyl sub-structure is reacted with 1-(chloromethyl)naphthalene. As for HINNME (Example 9), the product incorporates two nitrogen atoms each of which can be protonated in acid to enhance solubility and corrosion inhibition efficiency.

(139) NMHIE Synthesis:

(140) ##STR00032##

(141) Tryptamine (1) (0.7 g, 4.36 mmol) was dissolved in dimethylformamide (3.5 ml) and cooled to 10° C. Sodium hydride (60% in oil, 200 mg, 5 mmol) was added portionwise and stirred at 10° C. for 45 mins. A solution of 1-(chloromethyl)naphthalene (2) (842 mg, 4.76 mmol) in dimethylformamide (3.5 ml) was added dropwise then the mixture was stirred at ambient temperature overnight. The mixture was poured in water (20 ml), liquor decanted from precipitate which was dissolved in ethyl acetate and extracted with water. The organic phase was dried over sodium sulfate, the solvent removed and material applied to a silica column eluted with 2.5-5% (2M ammonia in methanol: dichloromethane)/dichloromethane to give 2-(1-(Naphthalene-1ylmethyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)ethan-1-amine (3), 819 mg (62% yield).

(142) Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency Tests on Metal Surfaces

(143) TABLE-US-00012 Concentration of NMHIE Concn Weight inhibitor KI Loss Pitting Metal type Wt % mmol/L mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Index 2205 (b9) 0.1542 5.13* 0 0.0927 0.4526 5 2205 (b9) 0.1542 5.13** 0 0.1084 0.5293 3 2205 (b9) 0.1500 4.99* 20 0.0090 0.0439 0 *It is noted that 0.5 wt % P2393, a polyoxyethylene tridecyl ether, C.sub.13H.sub.27(OCH.sub.2CH.sub.2).sub.nOH, where n = 10, was added to the 200 mL 4 mol/L HCl solution in order to enhance the solubility of the inhibitor NMHIE. **It is further noted that 5 mL of the mutual solvent ethylene glycol butyl ether (2-butoxyethanol) was added to the 200 mL 4 mol/L HCl solution in order to enhance the solubility of the inhibitor NMHIE.

Example 10: NMM

(144) ##STR00033##
NMM Synthesis

(145) ##STR00034##

(146) Morpholine (1) (1.3 g, 14.9 mmol), 1-(chloromethyl) naphthalene (2), (2.37 g, 13.4 mmol), potassium iodide (20 mg) and potassium carbonate (4.2 g, 30 mmol) were added to dimethylformamide (30 ml) and the suspension heated at 85° C. overnight. The solid was filtered and washed with dimethylformamide. Water and diethyl ether were added to the filtrate, the organic phase removed, extracted with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and the solvent removed. The crude product was purified using column chromatography eluting with 20-30% diethyl ether in hexane to give 4-(naphthalene-1-ylmethyl)morpholine (3), 2.3 g (75% yield).

(147) Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency Tests on Metal Surfaces

(148) TABLE-US-00013 Concentration of NMM Concn Weight inhibitor KI Loss Pitting Metal type Wt % mmol/L mmol/L lb/ft.sup.2 kg/m.sup.2 Index 2205 (b9) 0.1402 5.05 0 0.1160 0.5664 5 2205 (b9) 0.1397 5.04 20.12 0.0114 0.0557 2

Example 11—Comparison Tests

(149) The acid corrosion inhibition performance of the known acid corrosion inhibitor NMQCl and examples of the present disclosure have been tested on the Duplex stainless steel 2205, with and without potassium iodide addition. The results are shown in FIG. 4.

Example 12—Molecular Modelling

(150) Molecular modelling is used to calculate a few different parameters in order to better understand and compare protonated NMHQ and NMQCl as acid corrosion inhibitors.

(151) Energies of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) were calculated using local density approximation exchange correlation functional implemented in the Amsterdam Density Functional (ADF2013.01) program. The Slater basis sets with Double-Zeta plus one polarization functions were used. The frozen core approximation applied was large. During the calculation process, the geometry of the molecule was also optimized.

(152) Log P is calculated with Marvin Sketch using a weighted method from three database, Viswanadhan and Ghose1, Klopman's paper2, and PHYSPROP©. The electrolyte concentration is set to 0.1 M of Chloride anion and 0.1 M of Sodium or Potassium cation.

(153) Key factors influencing inhibition efficiency include conformation of molecule, energy levels such as HOMO, LUMO, fermi energy level E.sub.(fermi), and band gap, and solubility.

(154) As shown in FIG. 5, molecular modelling illustrates that NMHQ and NMQCl have similar conformation. In both inhibitor compounds, substructure B, the naphthyl group, is the electron donating HOMO. As shown in FIG. 5, the conformation of both compounds would allow their HOMO to lie flat on the metal substrate for electron sharing.

(155) Log P is a measure of hydrophobicity as defined by:
Log P.sub.octanol/water=log([solute].sub.octanol/[solute].sub.water)

(156) The protonated form of NMHQ has a log P value of 2.21 whereas NMHQ is significantly more hydrophobic (log P=5.28). Thus, the non-protonated form NMHQ is insoluble under neutral pH conditions.

(157) Molecular modelling gives the following results for NMHQ, protonated NMHQ and NMQCl:

(158) TABLE-US-00014 Inhibitors pKa LogP Ef/H Eg/H NMHQ 4.38 5.28 −0.145 0.084 Protonated NMHQ N/A 2.21 −0.286 0.119 NMQCl N/A 0.55 −0.315 0.043 N/A—not applicable

(159) As we can see from the above table, protonated NMHQ has a higher log P and Fermi level than NMQCl, both of which would lead to superior acid inhibition ability. However, NMQCl has a smaller band gap than protonated NMHQ, which would lead to superior acid inhibition ability. In view of the latter statements, overall molecular modelling suggests protonated NMHQ should show equal or better inhibition performance than NMQCl.

(160) In addition, NMHQ is protonated and thus soluble in acid which allows it to act as an acid corrosion inhibitor. Meanwhile, NMHQ is insoluble at neutral or alkaline pH due to de-protonation. This means NMHQ is insoluble in spent acid and formation brine when fluids flow back to the surface resulting in zero aquatic toxicity.

Example 13—Electrochemistry Experiments

(161) Dynamic flow conditions downhole have been recreated in the laboratory using Rotating Cylinder Electrodes (RCE). 5 mM of NMQCl and NMHQ have been tested at 2000 rpm and 80° C. in the presence of 10 mM KI and 4 mol/L HCl. Charge transfer resistance, R.sub.ct, is measured. Charge transfer resistance, R.sub.ct is a measure for corrosion resistance, and is inversely proportional to corrosion rate (CR). Therefore 1/R.sub.ct is proportional to CR. A higher 1/R.sub.ct means a faster corrosion rate, so indicating the corrosion inhibitor is less effective.

(162) The results 1/R.sub.ct are plotted in FIG. 6. It shows very similar results for NMQCl and NMHQ on 2205 and 13Cr. It also shows that NMHQ is a more effective inhibitor on both C-steels, N80 and HS80. In particular, corrosion rate in the presence of NMHQ is significant lower on HS80.

Example 14—Toxicity Tests

(163) The acute toxicity of NMHQ to the marine algae Skeletonema costatum was tested. Cultures of the algae Skeletonema costatum were exposed to a series of concentrations of NMHQ. The test was carried out according to ISO protocol ‘ISO 10253 Water quality—Marine algal growth inhibition test with Skeletonema costatum and Phaeodactylum tricornutum’.

(164) In addition to blank, concentrations of 10, 100, 1000 mg/L (WAF) in sea water were tested. The results were: EC50(72 h)>1000 mg/L; EC90(72 h)>1000 mg/L; NOEC(72 h)=1000 mg/L.

(165) This test confirms that NMHQ in seawater under neutral conditions (pH 7.7-8.3) results in zero aquatic toxicity, as expected due to its insolubility.