Plant and process for treating a stream comprising hydrogen sulfide
11008217 · 2021-05-18
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B01J8/24
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J4/008
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J38/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
C01B17/04
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J4/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J38/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The invention relates to an installation and a method for treating hydrogen sulphide. In particular, the invention relates to an installation and a method comprising at least one system for oxidizing hydrogen sulfide to sulfur (S) and water (H.sub.2O) with a solid reagent and at least one oxidizing system with an agent for oxidizing the solid reagent present in the reduced state, wherein the system of oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur and the system for oxidizing the solid reagent, are so arranged that the hydrogen sulfide is not brought into contact with the agent oxidizing the solid reagent.
Claims
1. A hydrogen sulfide treatment installation, wherein the installation comprises at least one system configured to oxidize hydrogen sulfide to sulfur (S) to water (H.sub.2O) by a solid reagent implementing the reaction H.sub.2S+sol-O.fwdarw.sol-R+H.sub.2O+S, wherein sol-O and sol-R respectively symbolize constituents of the solid reagent in oxidized and reduced forms, and at least one oxidizing system with an oxidizing agent of the solid reagent present in the reduced state, wherein the system oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide and the system oxidizing the solid reagent are so arranged that the hydrogen sulfide is not brought into contact with the agent oxidizing the solid reagent, wherein said installation comprises a supply duct for a flow comprising hydrogen sulfide to said hydrogen sulfide oxidizing system and a duct for discharge of a flow comprising sulfur.
2. The installation according to claim 1 comprising downstream of the system oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide in gaseous sulfur, a sulfur separator of the flow initially comprising sulfur.
3. The installation according to claim 2, wherein the separator is configured to condense sulfur in liquid or solid form.
4. The installation according to claim 1, wherein the installation comprises one or more switch(es) configured to switch between the inlet of the hydrogen sulfide in the system oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur and the inlet of the agent oxidizing the solid reagent to the system oxidizing the solid reagent.
5. The installation according to claim 1, wherein the system of oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur comprises a reactor oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide in the presence of a solid reagent present in the oxidized state.
6. The installation according to claim 1, wherein the system oxidizing the solid reagent comprises a supply of at least one oxidizing agent in gaseous form.
7. The installation according to claim 6, wherein the at least one oxidizing agent is oxygen.
8. The installation according to claim 1 comprising a loop configured to recycle the solid reagent, wherein the loop comprises an oxidizing system of the solid reagent present in the reduced state in the presence of an oxidizing agent and a system for reducing the solid reagent present in the oxidized state, wherein the system for reducing the solid reagent also forms the system oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide in the presence of a solid reagent present in the oxidized state.
9. The installation according to claim 1, wherein the solid reagent has the following chemical formula:
El1-Ox1 where El1 comprises one of the following elements taken alone or in any of their combinations and selected from the group consisting of: Bi, Co, Cu, Fe, Ir, Mo, Pb, Pd, Re, Rh, Ru, Sb, V and an oxide comprising one or more of these elements; wherein Ox1 comprises one of the following elements taken alone or in combination and selected from the group consisting of: Al, Ce, Ti, Mg, Si, Ta and their oxides.
10. The installation according to claim 1, wherein the flow comprising hydrogen sulfide comprises a hydrocarbon and/or carbon monoxide and/or dioxide, optionally in the presence of an inert gas.
11. The installation according to claim 10, wherein the hydrocarbon is methane.
12. The installation according to claim 10, wherein the inert gas is dinitrogen.
13. The installation according to claim 1 comprising a first reactor forming a system oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur and a second reactor forming a system oxidizing the solid reagent, wherein the first reactor is supplied with a flow containing hydrogen sulfide, while the first reactor forms a system for oxidizing hydrogen sulfide to sulfur, and the second reactor is fed with a flow containing at least one oxidizing agent when the second reactor forms a system oxidizing the solid reagent, wherein the solid reagent circulating in the reduced state from the first reactor to the second reactor and, in the oxidized state of the second reactor, to the first reactor.
14. The installation according to claim 1 comprising at least one oxidizing reactor alternately forming a system oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur and forming a system oxidizing the solid reagent, wherein the oxidizing reactor is alternately fed by a flow containing hydrogen sulfide when the reactor forms a system for oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur, and is supplied with a flow containing at least one oxidizing agent when the oxidizing reactor forms a system oxidizing the solid reagent.
15. The installation according to claim 14, wherein the solid reagent is immobilized in the oxidizing reactor.
16. The installation according to claim 1 comprising at least two reactors, wherein each forms alternately and conversely a system of oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur and a system of oxidizing the solid reagent, wherein a first reactor is alternately fed (i) with a flow containing hydrogen sulfide when the reactor forms a system for oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur, or (ii) by a flow containing at least one oxidizing agent when the first reactor forms a system for oxidizing of the solid reagent, and wherein a second reactor is alternately fed (i) by a flow containing hydrogen sulfide when the second reactor forms a system for oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur, and when the first reactor forms a system for oxidizing the solid reagent, or (ii) by a flow containing at least one oxidizing agent when the second reactor forms a system for oxidizing the solid reagent and when the first reactor forms a system for oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur.
17. The installation according to claim 16, wherein the solid reagent is immobilized in the first reactor and the second reactor.
18. The hydrogen sulfide treatment installation according to claim 1, wherein the hydrogen sulfide and the sulfur are in gaseous form.
19. A method for treating at least one flow comprising hydrogen sulfide, wherein the method comprises a step of oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur and water in the presence of a solid reagent in the oxidized state, and reducing during the oxidizing of the hydrogen sulfide, by implementing the reaction H.sub.2S+sol-O.fwdarw.sol-R+H.sub.2O+S, wherein sol-O and sol R respectively symbolize constituents of the solid reagent in oxidized and reduced forms, and a step of oxidizing the solid reagent present in the reduced state by at least one oxidizing agent in order to obtain a solid reagent in the oxidized state, wherein the method comprises obtaining a flow comprising sulfur by oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide.
20. The method according to claim 19, wherein the oxidizing step of hydrogen sulfide is carried out in the absence of an agent for oxidizing the solid reagent.
21. The method according to claim 19, wherein the oxidizing of the hydrogen sulfide is carried out under conditions limiting the complete oxidizing of hydrogen sulfide to sulfur oxide.
22. The method according to claim 19, wherein the oxidizing of hydrogen sulfide is carried out at a temperature ranging from 120° C. to 250° C.
23. The method according to any claim 19, wherein the flow comprising hydrogen sulfide has a hydrogen sulfide concentration whose stoichiometric conversion to sulfur and water would require a mixture comprising hydrogen sulfide and oxygen in the explosive range.
24. The method according to claim 19, wherein the oxidizing of hydrogen sulfide has a selectivity for the production of sulfur greater than 90%.
25. The method according to claim 19, wherein the oxidizing of hydrogen sulfide has a conversion to sulfur greater than 50%.
26. The method of claim 19 wherein the step of oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide to sulfur and water in the presence of a solid reagent in the oxidized state, and reducing during the oxidizing of the hydrogen sulfide is repeated.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(10) The method of the invention preferably comprises a reactive or catalytic solid alternately exposed and preferably repeated to each of the selective oxidizing reagents (H.sub.2S and O.sub.2) where it acts as an oxygen carrier. At first, the solid reacts with hydrogen sulphide to form sulfur and water, then it reacts with O.sub.2 to recharge itself in oxygen. During this second phase, the sulfur optionally deposited during the first phase is re-oxidized by oxygen, which advantageously makes it possible to avoid the deactivation of the solid reagent by sulfur accumulation, if need be.
(11) This method eliminates the main drawbacks described above, which make it possible in particular: (i) to obtain excellent selectivities, (ii) to remove any reagent concentration limitations in the absence of explosive mixtures, and (iii) to treat the flow of gas containing other reactive molecules such as hydrocarbons, such as methane, or carbon dioxide, without prior separation.
(12) One of the main disadvantages of the prior art is the limitation of the reaction equilibrium:
2H.sub.2S+SO.sub.2.fwdarw.3S+2H.sub.2O DH.sub.298° K=−234 Kj/mol (eq. 1)
(13) On the contrary, the selective oxidizing of H.sub.2S is practically irreversible and has no thermodynamic limitation.
2H.sub.2S+O.sub.2.fwdarw.2S+H.sub.2O DH.sub.298° K=−531 Kj/mol (eq. 2)
(14) However, the sulfur yield depends on the performance of the catalysts, in particular to avoid the total oxidizing of H.sub.2S to SO.sub.2 or SO.sub.3:
2H.sub.2S+3O.sub.2.fwdarw.2SO.sub.2+2H.sub.2O DH.sub.298° K=−1124 Kj/mol (eq. 3)
S+O.sub.2.fwdarw.SO.sub.2DH.sub.298° K=−297° Kj/mol (eq. 4)
2S+3O.sub.2.fwdarw.2SO.sub.3DH.sub.298° K=−882 Kj/mol (eq. 5)
(15) The sulfur yield depends on the catalytic performance of the material (conversion, selectivity) as well as the operating conditions (reaction temperature and the H.sub.2S/O.sub.2 ratio).
(16) In addition to the selectivity, it is also necessary to consider a probable deactivation of the catalyst because of the deposition of sulfur on the catalyst as well as the possibility of sulphidation of the metal or its oxide because it may also affect the stability of the catalyst.
(17) In summary, the selective oxidizing of H.sub.2S (eq. 2) has the advantage of directly leading to the production of S without producing other problematic by-products (SO.sub.2/SO.sub.3, provided that a catalytic system is efficient and selective. However, it has the disadvantage according to the prior art of requiring H.sub.2S—O.sub.2 mixtures that may adversely affect the selectivity and/or limit the operating conditions in view of the flammability of the mixture.
(18) The present invention relates to a method and an installation answering these technical problems.
(19) Advantageously, the present invention relates to a method and an installation implementing the reaction 2H.sub.2S+O.sub.2.fwdarw.2S+H.sub.2O within one reactor or a combination of several reactors for oxidizing the hydrogen sulphide and the reduction of oxygen.
(20) Advantageously, the present invention relates to a method and an installation implementing the 2H.sub.2S+O.sub.2.fwdarw.2S+H.sub.2O (eq. 6) reaction where sol-O and sol-R respectively symbolize constituents of the solid reagent in oxidized and reduced forms. The sulfur is then advantageously released in gaseous form.
(21) Advantageously, the invention relates to a method in which the reactive (or catalytic) solid is alternately exposed and preferably repeated to each of the reagents for the oxidizing of H.sub.2S (hydrogen sulphide and oxygen). Advantageously, the solid reagent acts as an oxygen carrier. At first, the solid reacts with H.sub.2S to form sulfur and water. Then, it reacts with oxygen to recharge in oxygen.
(22) The removal of hydrogen sulphide by selective oxidizing is not carried out according to the prior art because of the rapid deactivation of the catalysts and the low selectivity of sulfur due to the competition of different reactions. In addition, the operating conditions are generally limited by the explosiveness of H.sub.2S—O.sub.2 mixtures and are, therefore, not very suitable for the treatment of effluents that are highly concentrated in H.sub.2S as may result from desulfurization in petroleum refining or biogas. In all cases, according to the prior art, the H.sub.2S must be separated prior to the effluents by adsorption or washing which involves a multi-stage method and is highly energy-consuming and/or water-consuming.
(23) Advantageously, with the method and the installation according to the invention, the total oxidizing reaction of the sulfur produced is avoided by the absence of oxygen during the oxidizing phase of the hydrogen sulphide. Advantageously, according to the invention, the oxygen participating in the oxidizing reaction of hydrogen sulphide to sulfur is provided by the solid reagent.
(24) Advantageously, the selectivity in sulfur may therefore be greater than 95%, preferably greater than 99%, and may ideally reach 100%.
(25) Advantageously, the deactivation of the solid reagent may be avoided by reoxidizing the solid reagent during the reaction phase with the oxidizing agent, typically oxygen.
(26) The H.sub.2S concentration is not limited by the explosiveness of the H.sub.2S—O.sub.2 mixtures since these two reagents are never in contact.
(27) The selective oxidizing of H.sub.2S may be performed in the presence of other molecules such as methane (and CO.sub.2 in the case of biogas) without prior separation.
(28) The method may be optimized both for the treatment of effluents concentrated in H.sub.2S or, on the contrary, highly diluted.
(29) The method thus combines the advantage of the selective oxidizing of H.sub.2S with respect to other oxidizing approaches, namely including exothermic reactions, with stable operation, high selectivity in S (greater than 95%, preferably greater than 99%, and ideally 100%), a high conversion of H.sub.2S (greater than 95%, preferably greater than 99% and ideally 100%), and a negligible conversion of CH.sub.4 and CO.sub.2 (0%).
(30) The method makes it possible to selectively remove H.sub.2S (production of S) in gaseous effluents without limitation of explosiveness because it is produced without direct contact with the oxygen, and, advantageously, to remove H.sub.2S substantially completely (greater than 99%, and ideally 100%).
(31) In addition, this method makes it possible to treat complex effluents, in particular hydrocarbons or even biogas, without requiring prior separation of the hydrogen sulphide.
(32) Periodic recycling of the solid reagent allows the reoxidizing of the material and thus the maintenance of performance.
(33) The invention also relates to a method and an installation for substantially complete removal of hydrogen sulphide from different types of sources (effluents from desulphurization installations, biogas, etc.). By “substantially complete” or equivalent terms, it is understood to mean the removal of hydrogen sulphide so that it is only present in the effluent(s) likely to contain it, at a concentration that is lower than the standards and norms that are applicable according to the use.
(34) Advantageously, as the solid is regenerated at each cycle, deactivation by sulfur is avoided. H.sub.2S and S are never in direct contact with the oxidizing agent, the solid reagent, typically O.sub.2 (reagent), thus making it possible to limit the total oxidizing reaction of the sulfur in the first phase of the method and thus to optimize the selectivity.
(35) Advantageously, according to one variant, the method and the installation according to the invention operates in the absence of oxygen gas during the reaction of H.sub.2S with the solid reagent. In addition to improving the selectivity, this system is no longer limited by the explosiveness of H.sub.2S/O.sub.2 mixtures, thus allowing the treatment of effluents highly concentrated in H.sub.2S.
(36) In addition, through the higher reactivity of H.sub.2S with respect to hydrocarbons (especially methane), the invention also relates to a method and a treatment installation for H.sub.2S—CH.sub.4 mixtures that do not require prior separation of the H.sub.2S. This feature is interesting both for the treatment of hydrocarbons containing H.sub.2S but also for more complex mixtures such as biogas (typically CH.sub.4—CO.sub.2—H.sub.2S).
(37) According to one embodiment, at the envisaged reaction temperature, typically from 150° C. to 250° C., it is at the limit with respect to the sulfur dew point temperature (between 120° C. to 150° C.). It is therefore advantageously possible to collect the majority of the sulfur produced in a condenser downstream of the reactor.
(38) According to one embodiment, the reactor(s) used for the oxidizing reaction of the H.sub.2S consist(s) of a fixed catalytic bed reactor traversed by a gas flow consisting of the mixture of hydrogen sulfide and possibly diluted oxygen. The oxidizing of hydrogen sulphide is advantageously carried out at a temperature ranging from 120° C. to 250° C., for example from 150° C. to 250° C., or from 120° C. to 200° C., and/or at atmospheric pressure (101325 Pa).
(39) According to one embodiment, the oxidizing of the solid reagent is carried out at a temperature ranging from 150° C. to 250° C. and/or at atmospheric pressure (101325 Pa).
(40) According to one embodiment, the oxidizing reaction of H.sub.2S is carried out by subjecting the solid reagent to repeated cycles of oxidizing-reduction by alternately exposing it to hydrogen sulfide and oxygen. In practice this is achieved by periodically supplying the fixed bed reactor.
(41) This is the simplest method to achieve this type of reaction. Other variants exist, in particular, to improve the performance of the method on an industrial scale, for example by implementing circulating fluidized bed reactors in the installation or method of the invention. In this case, the solid reagent is conveyed between at least two separate reactors where it is exposed to each of the reagents independently. This type of installation and method also has the advantage of being able to optimize each of the reaction phases more efficiently leading, therefore, to even more efficient operation of the invention.
(42) According to one variant, the installation (or method) of the invention comprises a first reactor forming a system for oxidizing hydrogen sulphide to sulfur and a second reactor forming a system for oxidizing the solid reagent, wherein the first reactor is supplied with a flow containing hydrogen sulphide and the first reactor forms a system for oxidizing hydrogen sulphide to sulfur, while the second reactor is supplied with a flow containing at least one oxidizing agent and the second reactor forms a oxidizing system of the solid reagent, wherein the solid reagent circulates in the reduced state of the first reactor to the second reactor, and in the oxidized state of the second reactor to the first reactor.
(43) According to one variant, the installation (or method) of the invention comprises at least one oxidizing reactor (110) alternately forming a system for oxidizing the hydrogen sulphide to sulfur and forming an oxidizing system for the solid reagent, wherein the oxidizing reactor (110) is alternately fed by a flow (111) containing hydrogen sulphide when the reactor forms a system for oxidizing hydrogen sulphide to sulfur, and is fed by a flow (113) containing at least one oxidizing agent when the oxidizing reactor (110) forms an oxidizing system of the solid reagent, wherein the solid reagent is preferably immobilized in the oxidizing reactor (110).
(44) According to one variant, the installation (or method) of the invention comprises at least two reactors (310, 410) wherein each alternately and inversely forms a system for oxidizing the hydrogen sulphide to sulfur and an oxidizing system of a solid reagent, wherein a first reactor (310) is alternately fed (i) with a flow containing hydrogen sulphide (311) when the reactor forms a system for oxidizing hydrogen sulphide to sulfur, or (ii) by a flow containing at least one oxidizing agent (313) when the first reactor (310) forms an oxidizing system of the solid reagent, and a second reactor (410) is alternately fed (i) with a flow containing hydrogen sulphide (311) when the second reactor (410) forms a system for oxidizing hydrogen sulfide to sulfur and when the first reactor (310) forms an oxidizing system for the solid reagent, or (ii) a flow containing at least an oxidizing agent (313) when the second reactor (410) forms a system for oxidizing the solid reagent and when the first reactor (310) forms a system for oxidizing hydrogen sulphide to sulfur, wherein the solid reagent is preferably immobilized in the first reactor (310) and the second reactor (410).
(45) The invention relates to an installation implementing a method as defined according to any one of the variant embodiments, wherein preferred or advantageous aspects of the invention, including according to any one of their combinations.
(46) The invention relates to a method of implementing an installation as defined according to any one of the embodiments, variants, preferred or advantageous aspects of the invention, including in any one of their combinations.
(47) According to one variant, the concentration of H.sub.2S in the flow entering the oxidizing system of H.sub.2S is small, typically greater than 0% and less than or equal to 3%, or greater than 0% and less than or equal to 1%, or more than 0% and less than or equal to 0.5%. This may be the case, for example, in applications where the removal of H.sub.2S is in question. An excess amount of oxygen relative to stoichiometry may also be considered in order to ensure complete reoxidizing of the solid reagent and deposited sulfur.
(48) According to one variant, the concentration of H.sub.2S in the flow entering the oxidizing system of H.sub.2S is greater than 3 and less than or equal to 4%.
(49) According to one variant, the concentration of H.sub.2S in the flow entering the oxidizing system of H.sub.2S is greater than 4%.
(50) According to one variant, the concentration of H.sub.2S in the flow entering the oxidizing system of H.sub.2S is less than 44%.
(51) According to one variant, the concentration of H.sub.2S in the flow entering the oxidizing system of H.sub.2S is greater than 44%.
(52) Advantageously, the amount of solid reagent is sufficient to oxidize the amount of H.sub.2S involved. The amount of H.sub.2S depends on the concentration of H.sub.2S, the total flow rate of the flow containing H.sub.2S, and the duration of the oxidizing of H.sub.2S. (residence time in the oxidizing reactor). According to one variant, the number of moles of H.sub.2S is less than or equal to the number of moles of oxygen available for the oxidizing of H.sub.2S. This number of moles of available oxygen depends on the nature of the solid reagent, in particular in the oxidized state. According to one variant, the number of moles of oxygen available, in the form of dioxygen, for the oxidizing of the solid reagent is at least equal to or greater than the number of moles of oxygen consumed during the oxidizing of H.sub.2S (or reduction of the solid reagent with H.sub.2S).
(53) Alternatively, the flow comprising hydrogen sulphide may have a hydrogen sulphide concentration whose stoichiometric conversion to sulfur and water would require a mixture comprising hydrogen sulphide and oxygen in the explosive range.
(54) Advantageously, the oxidizing of hydrogen sulphide has a selectivity for the production of sulfur of greater than 90%, and preferably greater than 95%.
(55) Advantageously, the oxidizing of hydrogen sulphide has a conversion to sulfur greater than 50%, and preferably greater than 80%, and even more preferably greater than 90%.
(56) An advantage of the method according to the invention is that it is independent of the concentration of H.sub.2S.
(57) An advantage of the method according to the invention is that it may be implemented with an incoming flow containing, in addition to H.sub.2S, other gases such as, for example, hydrocarbons (alkanes, alkenes, and especially methane, etc.) because it is implemented at a low temperature that does not oxidize these other gases under the oxidizing conditions of H.sub.2S.
(58) The principle of the invention advantageously consists in using a solid reagent with particular properties: 1. having oxygen storage and transfer capacity; 2. allowing the activation of hydrogen sulphide; 3. under the conditions of implementation, selectively leading to sulfur and water (H.sub.2S+Sol-O.fwdarw.S+H.sub.2O+Sol-R) and not to total oxidizing (H.sub.2S+Sol-O.fwdarw.SO.sub.2+H.sub.2O+Sol-R) where (Sol-O and Sol-R represent the solid reagent in the oxidized and reduced state, respectively). The formation of by-products is thus advantageously limited. The formation of SO.sub.2 is advantageously limited as far as possible but is not unacceptable insofar as it is always more favorable to have SO.sub.2 instead of H.sub.2S in the output flow. 4. The oxygen storage capacity is advantageously reconstituted by reoxidizing with O.sub.2 (eq. 4).
(59) The conditions 1 and 4 above are generally provided by a solid comprising at least one reducible oxide. The condition 2 above may be provided by the same oxide or by another solid phase associated with the first, for example a metal supporting, or supported by, the reducible oxide. Condition 3 above is determined by the nature of the oxide or all of the phases present in the solid reagent, as well as the operating conditions of oxidizing and reduction of the solid reagent.
(60) The activity and the selectivity of the solid is ensured by the presence of a reducible oxide serving as oxygen vector and H.sub.2S activation at the same time.
(61) Advantageously, the method of the invention is carried out over several repeated cycles of oxidizing the hydrogen sulfide and the solid reagent, for example over at least 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, or 100 cycles. The solid reagent may be discharged and replaced with a new solid reagent if necessary in order to restart new oxidizing cycles.
(62) Advantageously, the method and the installation according to the invention operate continuously, i.e. the production of sulfur is continuous from a continuous flow containing hydrogen sulphide.
(63) Alternatively, the method and the installation according to the invention operate in a discontinuous or semi-continuous manner, i.e. the production of sulfur is discontinuous or semi-continuous from a discontinuous or semi-continuous flow containing hydrogen sulphide.
(64) The invention therefore relates, in another aspect, to a solid reagent (which may also be called a catalyst) having the following chemical formula and its use as a solid reagent, especially in the installation and/or the method according to the invention:
El1-Ox1
(65) where El1 comprises or consists of one of the following elements taken alone or in any of their combinations and selected from among: Bi, Co, Cu, Fe, Ir, Mo, Pb, Pd, Re, Rh, Ru, Sb, V and oxides and hydroxides comprising one or more of these elements; wherein Ox1 comprises or consists of one of the following elements taken alone or in combination and selected from among: Al, Ce, Ti, Mg, Si, Ta and their oxides;
(66) The solid reagent may contain hydroxides in the initial state. The hydroxides will then be converted into oxides during oxidizing of the solid reagent.
(67) According to a specific embodiment, Ox1 comprises or consists of one of the following elements taken alone or according to any one of their combinations and chosen from among: Al.sub.2O.sub.3, CeO.sub.2, TiO.sub.2, MgO, SiO.sub.2 and Ta.sub.2O.sub.5.
(68) According to a specific embodiment, El1 comprises or consists of one of the following elements taken separately or according to any one of their combinations and chosen from among: V, Cu, Mo and Pb.
(69) According to a specific embodiment, El1 comprises or consists of an oxide of El1 supported on a titanium dioxide, and, in particular, a vanadium oxide supported on a titanium dioxide.
(70) The supported V-based solid reagents are well known for the partial oxidizing of hydrogen sulfide in conventional (co-fed) reactors, so they have interesting H.sub.2S activation properties.
(71) The invention particularly relates to a solid reagent based vanadium oxide particles (V.sub.2O.sub.5), in particular supported on titanium dioxide (TiO.sub.2). Advantageously, the support acts essentially as inert phase in this reaction and at the same time promotes the dispersion of V.sub.2O.sub.5. The latter advantageously acts as oxygen carrier by oxidizing and reduction under O.sub.2 and H.sub.2S respectively. It advantageously allows the good activation of hydrogen sulfide and thus high conversions. Under these conditions, the selectivity during the oxidizing of H.sub.2S is excellent whereas at a higher reaction temperature (for example at 250° C.), these same elements lead to a significant production of SO.sub.2 under the same operating conditions.
(72) Preferably, the solid reagent has a ratio El1/(El1+Ox1) by weight ranging from 0.005 to 1.
(73) Advantageously, the solid reagent is supported on TiO.sub.2(V/TiO.sub.2), preferably with a ratio V/(V+TiO.sub.2) ranging from 0.005 to 1, and preferably 0.0077.
(74) The amount of V.sub.2O.sub.5 is preferably sufficient to convert at least 90% and preferably at least 99% of hydrogen sulfide. The amount of V.sub.2O.sub.5 is, for example, 1.5 or 3 times higher (in moles) than the amount of H.sub.2S treated per cycle.
(75) The present invention is also illustrated by the embodiments according to the figures described below:
(76)
(77)
(78) According to
(79)
(80)
(81) Thus, the device according to
(82) The switching device 140 may consist of one or more elements such as, for example, connection valves, etc.
(83) According to
(84)
(85) A device for switching the gas flows 340, 440 makes it possible to feed each reactor advantageously and successively and preferably repeatedly with the three gaseous flows mentioned in the method and the installation according to
(86) The combination of at least two reactors 310, 410 makes it possible to inject a reactive flow containing hydrogen sulphide into a reactor, for example 310, while the flow of oxidizing agent is injected into the other reactor, for example 410. A neutral or inert gas flow ensures purging between the passages of the reactive flows in each reactor 310, 410.
(87)
(88) According to
(89) According to
(90) According to
(91) Other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art following the reading of the explanatory description which refers to examples which are given solely by way of illustration and which in no way limit the scope of the invention.
(92) The examples are an integral part of the present invention and any features appearing novel from any prior art from the description as a whole, including the examples, form an integral part of the invention in its function and its general scope.
(93) Thus, each example has a general scope.
(94) On the other hand, in the examples, the concentrations of the solids are given in percentages by weight, unless otherwise indicated, while the concentrations of the gases are given in percentages by volume, unless otherwise indicated, the temperature is the ambient temperature (25° C.) and is expressed in degrees Celsius, unless otherwise indicated, and the pressure is atmospheric pressure (101325 Pa) unless otherwise indicated.
EXAMPLES
(95) The invention was implemented with solid reagents manufactured in the laboratory. The behavior of the V-based solid reagent supported on TiO.sub.2 was verified using a commercial support (Aldrich).
(96) TiO.sub.2 (99.8% anatase, Sigma Aldrich) was washed for one hour with distilled water with stirring at room temperature. After centrifugation, the TiO.sub.2 and the washings were separated and the TiO.sub.2 was recovered. This operation was repeated 3 times. The washed TiO.sub.2 was dried first in air and then in an oven overnight at 100° C. Finally, it was calcined under air at 450° C. for 4 h with a ramp of 5° C. min-1.
(97) Vanadium is deposited by impregnation from ammonium metavanadate (NH.sub.4VO.sub.3). 90.04 mg of the NH.sub.4VO.sub.3 precursor (99%, Sigma Aldrich) was introduced into 20 ml of 1M oxalic acid. The mixture was heated with stirring at 100° C. Then, 5 g of previously washed and calcined TiO.sub.2 was added to the solution, and then the mixture was kept at 100° C. while stirring until the solvent had completely evaporated. Finally, the mixture was dried in an oven overnight, then calcined in air at 450° C. for 4 h, with a ramp of 5° C. min-1.
(98) The solid thus obtained has a mass fraction V/(V+TiO.sub.2)=0.0077 or 0.77%.
(99) The following tables present some representative results. There are reported:
(100) In Table 1: the nature of the solid used (the nature of the metal, the mass content of metal) as well as the reaction conditions (the amount of solid reagent used, the reaction temperature, the concentrations of hydrogen sulphide and oxygen used in percentages by volume, the total flow of incoming gas, the conditions of periodic operation (cycle times).
(101) The tests were carried out in an installation as shown diagrammatically in
(102) Table 2 represents the results obtained under the conditions of the examples of Table 1 during exposure to H.sub.2S. The conversion of hydrogen sulphide and the selectivity towards S were, in particular, measured.
(103) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Concentrations Metal m.sub.sol nV.sub.2O.sub.5/nH.sub.2S T of reagents Cycles Inlet flow Ex. No (% by weight) (g) (molar ratio) (° C.) (vol %) (number) (cc/min) cycle 1 0.77 0.4 3 150 0.2% H.sub.2S − 3 100 1 min. H.sub.2S − 0.1% O.sub.2 1 min. O.sub.2 2 0.77 0.1 0.75 150 0.2% H.sub.2S − 4 100 1 min. H.sub.2S − 0.5% O.sub.2 1 min. O.sub.2 3 0.77 0.2 1.5 150 0.2% H.sub.2S + 2 100 1 min. H.sub.2S + 20% CH.sub.4 − CH.sub.4 − 0.5% O.sub.2 1 min. O.sub.2 4 0.77 0.2 1.5 250 0.2% H.sub.2S + 2 100 1 min. H.sub.2S + 20% CH.sub.4 − CH.sub.4 − 0.5% O.sub.2 1 min. O.sub.2 5 0.77 0.4 3 150 0.2% H.sub.2S + 30 100 1 min. H.sub.2S + 20% CH.sub.4 − CH.sub.4 − 0.5% O.sub.2 1 min. O.sub.2 6 0.77 0.4 3 150 0.2% H.sub.2S + 30 100 1 min. H.sub.2S + 20% CH.sub.4 + CH.sub.4 + CO.sub.2 − 10% CO.sub.2 − 0.5% O.sub.2 1 min. O.sub.2 m.sub.so is the mass of solid reagent cc/min is cubic centimeters per minute
(104) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Conver- Selec- Conver- Conver- Conver- Example sion H.sub.2S tivity S sion CH.sub.4 sion CO.sub.2 sion O.sub.2 No (%) ± 1 (%) ± 1 (%) ± 1 (%) ± 1 (%) ± 1 1 100 100 — — 100 2 60-70 100 — — 5-10 3 90-95 100 0 — 20-30 4 95-100 85-90 0 — 20-25 5 100 100 0 — 20-30 6 100 100 0 0 20-30
(105) The conversion of H.sub.2S is very high (greater than 99% and close to 100% in Examples Nos. 1 and 4 to 6). The conversion to oxygen is lower because, in the examples (except No. 1), the tests were carried out with an excess of oxygen.
(106) The selectivity of S is very high (greater than 99% and close to 100%, except Example 4) with the absence of measurable SO.sub.2 output. A lower value is indicative of SO.sub.2 formation.
(107) Examples 5 and 6 are composed of 30 complete cycles and show excellent stability of the behavior of the solids. In this case, the values indicated are averages integrated over the last 6 cycles carried out.
(108) These results show that under very wide operating conditions both in terms of temperature and quantities of the solid, the performances of the system are close to the ideal in terms of reactivity.
(109) The examples support the robustness of the method according to the invention when the above conditions are met, but also its adaptability to very variable operating conditions. They also demonstrate a great leeway for optimization, in particular by: The control of the quantity and nature of the active or even multi-metallic phase by combining several elements in order to optimize the method of activation of H.sub.2S and selectivity towards sulfur and water; The control of the oxygen supply from the oxide or support by changing its nature (oxides, mixed oxides, doped oxides); The control of the total oxidizing of the catalyst and the sulfur thanks to the contribution of oxygen in the second phase of the method.
(110) In the more specific context of the use of biogas, this method is particularly advantageous because the H.sub.2S impurity is removed without converting either CH.sub.4 or CO.sub.2.