METAL-CONTAINING FABRICS AND MEMBRANES, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF

Abstract

A method of manufacturing a metal fabric or membrane, the method comprises providing an ink comprising a plurality of semiconductor particles disposed in a first solvent. The method comprises applying the ink to a fabric or membrane to obtain a fabric or membrane comprising a plurality of semiconductor particles. Finally, the method comprises contacting the fabric or membrane comprising the plurality of semiconductor particles with a deposition solution comprising a second solvent, an autocatalytic agent, and metal cations to thereby cause a reaction to occur such that the metal cations are reduced and at least partially displace the semiconductor particles, to thereby provide a metal fabric or membrane.

Claims

1. A method of manufacturing a metal fabric or membrane, the method comprising: providing an ink comprising a plurality of semiconductor particles disposed in a first solvent; applying the ink to a fabric or membrane to obtain a fabric or membrane comprising a plurality of semiconductor particles; and contacting the fabric or membrane comprising the plurality of semiconductor particles with a deposition solution comprising a second solvent, an autocatalytic agent, and metal cations to thereby cause a reaction to occur such that the metal cations are reduced and at least partially displace the semiconductor particles, to thereby provide a metal fabric or membrane.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the semiconductor particles comprise an organic semiconductor or an inorganic semiconductor.

3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the semiconductor particles comprise silicon particles.

4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the concentration of the semiconductor particles in the first solvent is between 1 mg ml.sup.−1 and 10 g ml.sup.−1.

5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the ink further comprises a stabiliser.

6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the fabric or membrane comprises a cotton fabric, a linen fabric, a paper fabric or a nitrocellulose membrane.

7. A method according to claim 1, wherein prior to applying the ink to the fabric or membrane, the method comprises applying a hydrophobic material to the fabric or membrane in a manner configured to define hydrophilic channels on the fabric or membrane.

8. A method according to claim 1, wherein the second solvent comprises water.

9. A method according to claim 1, wherein the semiconductor particles comprise an oxidised outer layer and the autocatalytic agent is configured to react with the oxidised outer layer and thereby remove the oxidised outer layer from the semiconductor particles.

10. A method according to claim 9, wherein, the autocatalytic agent comprises hydrofluoric acid (HF) or a fluoride salt.

11. A method according to claim 1, wherein the metal cations comprise ruthenium cations, rhodium cations, palladium cations, silver cations, osmium cations, iridium cations, platinum cations, gold cations or copper cations.

12. A method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises applying a further deposition solution comprising a solvent, an autocatalytic agent and further metal cations to the fabric or membrane to thereby cause a further autocatalytic reaction to occur such that the further metal cations are reduced and at least partially displace the semiconductor particles, wherein the further metal cations in the further deposition solution are different to the metal cations in the first deposition solution.

13. A method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises electrodepositing a further metal on the metal fabric or membrane.

14. A method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises sintering the metal fabric or membrane.

15. A metal fabric or membrane obtained or obtainable by the method claim 1.

16. A metal fabric or membrane comprising a fabric or membrane and a plurality of particles disposed in or on the fabric or membrane, wherein the particles comprise a semiconductor core with a metal disposed thereon.

17. A metal fabric or membrane according to claim 16, wherein a portion of the fabric or membrane is entrapped within the metal.

18. A metal fabric or membrane according claim 16, wherein the metal fabric or membrane comprises an electrical interconnect, an antenna, an electrode, a surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) substrate and/or a microfluidic device.

19. (canceled)

20. A battery, a microfluidic paper-based analytical device (μPAD), a chemical transducer or a gas or vapour sensor comprising the metal fabric or membrane defined claim 16.

Description

[0106] For a better understanding of the invention, and to show how embodiments of the same may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying Figures, in which:

[0107] FIG. 1A shows how silicon micropowder is processed into precursor ink by ballmilling and ultrasonication until particle sizes match fabric pore sizes, and a silicon (Si) ink is produced; FIG. 1B shows how wax barriers are printed onto paper and the silicon ink is then applied; and FIG. 1C shows how the paper is then placed into a bath containing hydrofluoric acid (HF) and metal salts, in particular; FIG. C1 shows how metal cations are attracted to electrons in Si valence band; FIG. C2 shows how electrons (e−) in the Si are attracted to the deposited metal nuclei, catalysing further reduction of metal cations. Si is subsequently oxidised near the metal nuclei, forming SiO.sub.2 that is etched away by the HF solution; and FIG. C3 shows how metal cations in solution deposit preferentially on metal nuclei, which grow accordingly. This creates percolation pathways throughout the entire fabric structure, formed around Si microparticles that sit within the fibres;

[0108] FIG. 2A shows images taken using an optical microscope of paper with an Si ink printed thereon (left), and the paper after gold has been deposited on the Si particles in an autocatalytic reaction (right); FIG. 2B shows images taken using an optical microscope of cotton fabric (left), and the cotton after a silicon ink has been printed thereon and then silver has been deposited on the Si particles in an autocatalytic reaction (right); FIG. 2C shows SEM images of a fabric with an Si ink printed thereon (left), metal nuclei which have formed on the Si particles after autocatalytic deposition has been allowed to occur for 40 seconds (centre), and metal crystals which have formed on the Si particles after autocatalytic deposition has been allowed to occur for 20 minutes (right); FIG. 2D shows how a metal fabric produced in accordance with the current invention is extremely hydrophilic and binder-free (left), whereas commercially available metal nano-particle ink produce fabrics which are hydrophobic and require a binder (right); and FIG. 2E shows energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra demonstrating a variety of noble metals that can be autocatalytically deposited;

[0109] FIG. 3 shows a table (left) containing the achieved sheet resistances for a range of fabrics with a single autocatalytic coating; a graph (centre) showing how sheet resistance decreases with deposition time, as metal crystals grow larger and form more percolation pathways; and a further graph (right) showing how sheet resistance may be decreased further by sintering at 100° C., with further crystal growth causing coalescence;

[0110] FIG. 4A shows an Ag-paper NFC antenna, with metal cost <$0.01, is capable of harvesting 0.4 W; and FIG. 4B shows how further metals may deposited by electroplating, enabling a variety of electrochemical cells such as Zn—Ag or Zn—Cu. Paper Zn—Ag batteries have been fabricated generating V.sub.emf>2V per cell;

[0111] FIGS. 5A and 5B show a μPED that has been fabricated using autocatalytically deposited Ag as the counter and working electrodes; FIGS. 5C to 5E show calibration of the μPED; FIG. 5F shows that methylene blue based DNA detection has been demonstrated with the hybridization of the complementary DNA strains in the presence of another oligo; FIGS. 5G and 5H show that autocatalytic Au paper, coated with streptavidin, has successfully immobilised 50 nM of biotinylated protein; and FIGS. 5I and 5J shows that Au paper has been demonstrated as a substrate for SERS thus enabling pH measurements, by functionalising with 4-MBA (characteristic peak 1,100 cm.sup.−1), due to protonation of its carboxylic acid end group;

[0112] FIG. 6 shows how dependence of the peak current on the scan rate was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) sweeping the potential from −0.8 to +1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl at 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 mV.Math.s.sup.−1. The metallized Ag paper working electrode (2 cm×2 cm of geometric area) has effective areas of 8.2±0.4 cm.sup.2 and 8.6±0.6 cm.sup.2 from anodic and cathodic data respectively, calculated from the Randles-Sevcik equation;

[0113] FIG. 7 shows how square wave voltammetry of DNA capture show current signals after adding in a row 1 μM capture DNA, 1 μM control DNA and 1 μM target DNA;

[0114] FIG. 8 shows binding events on metallized Au paper electrode: (1) SA was immobilised on AuPE through physical adsorption and (2) Biotinylated protein immobilised on the SA;

[0115] FIG. 9 is a graph (left) showing CV scans of the SA-AuPE in ECRS at different scan rate ranging from 2 mV/s to 200 mV/s; and a further graph (right) showing SW scans of the biotinylated protein titration at 12.5 nM bitinylated protein to the SA-immobilised AuPE in ECRS at different times;

[0116] FIG. 10 shows how metallized silver and gold paper demonstrated as SERS substrates by functionalising with the Raman marker 4-MBA, characterised by peaks at 1,100 and 1,590 cm.sup.−1;

[0117] FIG. 11 is a graph showing how the Ag-paper NFC antenna, of FIG. 4A performed compared to a commercial Ag NFC antenna fabricated by chemical etching on a flex polymer substrate;

[0118] FIGS. 12A-D are graphs showing the resistance and current of a silver fabric produced using the present invention; and

[0119] FIG. 13 is a graph showing how the resistance recorded by a microfluidic device changes when the device is exposed to NO.sub.2.

EXAMPLES

[0120] As explained in the following examples, the inventors have developed a method which overcomes the difficulties of fabric metallization with a binder-free silicon precursor ink. Autocatalytic deposition of metal inside fabrics is enabled at room temperature with ultra-low cost and with tuneable hydrophilicity. Noble metals like Ag, Au and Pt are grown throughout the fibrous materials, harnessing the rough surface to create highly conductive and flexible networks.

[0121] Applications of metallic fabrics are also demonstrated, all of which benefit from the uniquely simple and low-cost chemical process. The provision of energy for fabric-based electronic devices is shown with an ultra-low cost near-field communication (NFC) induction antenna for wireless power. The porous and high surface-area metal nanoparticle networks are presented as a strong candidate for paper-based silver-zinc batteries for on-board power. Hydrophilic and conductive metallic paper is then exploited as an electrochemical transducer for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) detection in a monolithic device, and for protein immobilization in biosensing applications. Rough metallic nano-particle surfaces are finally exploited as a plasmonic sensing substrate for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS).

Example 1—Preparation of Silicon Ink and Deposition on a Fabric

Materials

[0122] Paper substrate was Whatman 4 Qualitative Filter Paper 1004-185 was purchased from GE. Pure cotton fabric was purchased from Amazon. Silicon metal powder was purchased from Pilamec UK Ltd.

Methods

[0123] Silicon Precursor Ink

[0124] Silicon powder mixed with deionised water (0.1 g ml.sup.−1) and ground in a Capco 12VS rolling ball mill for 48 hours. Ink was then ultrasonicated in a Branson Digital Sonifier 450 for 40 minutes, with an output power of 240W. Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) was then added, 1 g CMC per 100 ml Si ink.

[0125] Paper Electronic Devices

[0126] Wax designs have been printed with a Xerox ColorQube 8580 wax printer on Office Depot transparent sheets, and transferred to paper or cotton substrates with a Vevor HP230B heat press at 180° C. Silicon precursor inks have been pipetted and then allowed to dry naturally.

Material Characterisation

[0127] Particle size distribution measurements have been made with a Malvern Masterizer 2000 laser diffraction particle size analyser, with 50 mg Si particles dispersed in 20 ml dionised water, measured at pump speed of 1750 rpm.

[0128] Optical microscope images have been taken on a Brunel SP202XM metallurgical microscope connected to a Nikon D3200 camera. SEM images are from a Sigma 300.

Results

[0129] As well its suitability for autocatalytic deposition, Si is a practical precursor material due to its ultra-low cost and inertness. Si micropowders, costing less than $0.001 per g, have been processed with ball-milling and sonication apparatus resulting in Si particle sizes less than 10 μm in diameter, as shown in FIG. 1A. Particles have been dispersed in water and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), which adds viscosity as required, to synthesise a binder-free Si ink.

[0130] The manufacture of Si fabrics is shown in FIG. 1B. Hydrophilic channels can be obtained up to 1 mm resolution using a commercial wax printer. As reported by Hamedi in 2016, wax is printed and then briefly annealed at 190° C., causing it to wick through the porous cellulose structure, creating a hydrophobic barrier through the entire cross section of the substrate [19]. The Si ink is then printed on hydrophilic areas where it diffuses between the cellulose or cotton fibres. After solvent evaporation at room temperature the Si remains wrapped around the fibres, as can be seen optically and under scanning electron microscope (SEM) in FIG. 2. Wax barriers enable confinement of the Si precursor ink, permitting Si structures with complex designs.

Example 2—Electroless Deposition

Materials

[0131] Silver nitrate (AgNO.sub.3), potassium hexachloroplatinate(IV) (K.sub.2PtCl.sub.6), potassium tetrachloroaurate(III) (KAuCl.sub.4) and hydrofluoric acid (50%) were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Methods

[0132] Fabric substrates with printed Si, prepared according to example 1, were washed with deionised water, submerged in an autocatalytic bath, containing 50 ml of 5 wt % hydrofluoric acid mixed with 2.5 ml of 1M AgNO.sub.3, for 20 minutes. The fabric was washed again and then allowed to dry naturally.

[0133] When a platinum or gold fabric was produced, then K.sub.2PtCl.sub.6 or KAuCl.sub.4, respectively, were used instead of AgNO.sub.3. The method and molar concentration used were as described above.

Electrical and Material Characterisation

[0134] Optical and SEM images were taken as described in example 1. EDX measurements from a LEO Gemini 1525 electron microscope.

[0135] Conductivity measurements have been made using rectangle samples, 0.5×4 cm, connected with flat-toothed crocodile clips, outputting to a Tenma T2-7730A multimeter. Seven samples have been made for each material, with results averaged and standard error used.

Results

[0136] The Si microparticles disposed in the fabric quickly form an outer layer of relatively inert silicon dioxide (SiO.sub.2). This is removed in the HF solution with the anodic oxidation reaction in Equation 1.

SiO.sub.2+6HF.fwdarw.H.sub.2SiF.sub.6+2H.sub.2O  (1)

[0137] Noble metal ions in close proximity to the silicon attract electrons from the Si valence band, as shown in FIG. 1C1, forming nanoscale metal nuclei on the Si microparticles. The higher electronegativity of noble metals attracts electrons in the Si, causing the metal nuclei to become negatively charged. This catalyses further reduction of metal ions (FIG. 1C2) in a reaction counterpart to Equation 1. The remaining metal ions in solution therefore deposit preferentially on the existing metal nuclei, which grow accordingly as shown in FIG. 1C3. This process also increases oxidation of Si below the metal deposition. The subsequent SiO.sub.2 is etched away by the HF solution, allowing the deposited metal to displace it [21,22,24].

[0138] It is noted that in this example the inventors use a solution of 5 wt % hydrofluoric acid. This concentration was selected to ensure that the reaction proceeds quickly, and sufficient deposition is observed within 20 minutes. However, the inventors have also observed the autocatalytic reaction occurring when much lower concentrations of hydrofluoric acid are used. For instance, when the inventors used a solution of 0.5 wt % hydrofluoric acid autocatalytic deposition still occurred.

[0139] Conductive metal pathways have therefore been grown inside the fabric structures, reaching sheet resistance R.sub.s<1 Ω□.sup.−1. This electroless deposition of metal inside fabrics works at room temperature, is binder free and costs <4¢ cm.sup.−2 for Ag metal. FIG. 2 shows optical images of autocatalytically deposited Au and Ag in paper and cotton fabric respectively. Noble metals Au, Ag and Pt have been deposited inside fabrics, shown in energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra in FIG. 2E. In contrast to conventional Ag nanoparticle inks, this metallic paper is completely hydrophilic, see FIG. 2D, rendering it ideal for vertical flow assays and wet sensing applications.

[0140] Over longer deposition times metal nuclei grow larger as imaged by SEM in FIG. 2C. This generates more conductive pathways and increases conductivity shown in FIG. 3. Sintering is a common post-deposition step for metals on paper, where energy absorbed by the deposited metal particles causes them to melt and coalesce, forming more conductive pathways. While this is typically undertaken close to 200° C., lower temperatures of 100° C. are suitable here due to the high surface area of metal nuclei, which are of the order of 100 nm in diameter. Sintering in an oven has a marked effect of increasing conductivity as shown in FIG. 3.

[0141] The electrical behaviour as a result of mechanical bending is shown in FIG. 12A. Measurements were taken from points at fixed distances for six 2 cm long samples. Electrical resistance increases as a result of bending similarly to flexible strain sensors during initial bending cycles. As observed, for bending distances of over 10 mm (bend angle>90°) the error in measurement increases to indicate the limit of flexibility.

[0142] The inventors also noted the durability of the metallic fabric (Ag) under cyclic strain (distance=8 mm, angle=90°) during 1000 cycles, and the results are shown in FIG. 12B. The resistance increases significantly during the first 30 cycles. Subsequently the response stabilizes and increases minimally after 700 cycles which indicates that the substrate is suitable for flexible applications.

[0143] The electrical conductivity of the sample remains suitably high for the applications proposed even after bending. The current-voltage curve for the silver fabric shows a typical resistor behaviour up to 1.5 V, see FIG. 12C. The current-voltage curve for Ag-paper and silver-silver chloride ink for higher and negative voltages using Al contacts show an identical shape, see FIG. 12D.

Example 3—NFC Antenna

Methods

[0144] Antennae have been outlined with wax barriers on cellulose paper, as described in example 1. The antenna was then fabricated by depositing Si ink on the cellulose paper, as described in example 1, and then depositing silver on the Si particles, as described in example 2. The antenna was then connected across a 100Ω resistor and placed on the back of an NFC-active phone. The induced voltage across the resistor was measured with a Tektronix TBS 1052B-EDU digital oscilloscope.

Results

[0145] A silver near-field communication (NFC) induction antenna was fabricated on cellulose paper, as show in FIG. 4A, using the methods described in examples 1 and 2. This facilitates wireless power and data transfer to monolithic electronic devices inside fabric materials, with ultra-low fabrication cost. Antenna cost is controlled by quantity of silver nitrate (AgNO.sub.3) used, which is currently $0.17 per (non-optimised) device.

[0146] Quality of antennae is demonstrated in comparison to a commercial NFC antenna in FIGS. 4A and 11, measuring induced voltage across a 100Ω resistor. The paper antenna produced using the methods described in examples 1 and 2 induced root-mean-squared voltage of V.sub.rms=6.4 V. This was sufficient to power a LED, and could provide 409.6 mW of wireless power to devices on a fabric substrate.

Example 4—Silver Battery

[0147] Batteries contain electrodes that release chemical energy, via ions in an electrolyte, once connected to an external circuit. The rough and porous structure of paper can be advantageous for batteries, due to the high resultant surface area and electrolyte absorption. Paper based batteries are usually reported with carbon nanotubes, Li-ion, Zn and polymer electrodes [25-28].

Materials

[0148] Zinc metal sheet purchased from Sanying Ltd.

Methods

[0149] Electrodeposition

[0150] Silver paper was prepared in accordance with the methods described in examples 1 and 2. Further wax barriers were added to paper, after electroless deposition, using the same approach described in example 1. Zinc was then deposited on the silver paper by electrodeposition in 1 M NH.sub.4Cl electrolyte. Positive electrode was zinc metal sheet, and negative electrode was silver paper and electrodeposition occurred at a constant voltage of 1 V for 30 minutes. The electrode was then washed with deionised water and dried gently with paper towel, before immediate use in battery.

[0151] Battery Fabrication and Characterisation

[0152] Silver and zinc electrodes were separated by paper barrier of the same specification. The batteries folded and connected in series, and then laminated with polyethylene in a heat press. A hole was pierced in the polyethylene, through which 250 μl of 2M NaOH electrolyte was added. The circuit was completed with two 100Ω resistors and voltage measured using a Tenma T2-7730A multimeter.

Results

[0153] The inventors have grown noble metal nanoparticles through the cross-section of paper via electroless deposition, and a wide range of additional metals can then be deposited by electrodeposition. Wax barriers can be added on top of electrolessly deposited metals making them hydrophobic. This has been exploited to prevent the electrolyte from wicking through the paper to the source electrode. The electrodeposition of a wide range of metals including Zn enables the manufacture of sophisticated Zn—Ag and AgO batteries. It may be appreciated that an AgO electrode could be produced by producing a silver fabric using the methods described in examples 1 and 2 and then anodising the fabric. The inventors therefore present a technique for paper based batteries with high surface area, ultra-low fabrication cost and deposition of a wide range of metal electrodes. The electromotive force of individual Zn—Ag cell is sufficient to power an LED, supplying over 2 V for 20 s at constant current, as shown in FIG. 4B. This corresponds to an energy density of 369 mWh g.sup.−1, greater than the 108 mWh g.sup.−1 supplied by the paper based Li-ion battery in 2010 by Hu et al [28]. Multiple cells can be fabricated monolithically on one paper substrate, stacked or folded, they are inherently lightweight and can be stored in dry form.

Example 5—DNA Sensing μPED

[0154] Microfluidic paper-based electroanalytical devices (μPEDs) enable in-situ laboratory analysis, using minimal reagents and analytes, on cheap and disposable substrates. Microfluidic devices controlling small volumes of fluids were originally conceived for plant extract analysis, but μPEDS are now used, among other applications, for clinical blood analysis of pathogens, proteins and across environmental, pharmaceutical and food industries. They are especially relevant in developing countries with rudimentary diagnostic facilities [29-31].

[0155] DNA plays a vital role, not only in genetics, but also in bioanalytics since DNA-DNA interactions are associated with many different diseases. The application of DNA as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker has therefore recently become an important issue for medicine [32]. The most frequently used method for DNA detection is based on fluorescence markers using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). These systems, however, often suffer from bulky and expensive equipment for on-site testing. As an alternative, electrochemical DNA detection has been previously reported based on intercalation of redox-active methylene blue (MB) in μPEDs allowing a low-cost and miniaturized realization. Here, the MB molecules bind specifically to the guanine bases during the hybridization process of two single DNA strains. This reduces the MB concentration in the solution and thus leads to decreased redox signals in voltammetry. This approach can be combined with PCR or isothermal amplification in order to enhance the sensitivity [33,34]

Materials

[0156] All chemicals used in this work were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, UK. The employed oligonucleotides including a capture DNA (cDNA) 5′-ttg gcc gat gga ggc gag gt-3′, a target DNA (tDNA) complementary to cDNA 5′-acc tcg cct cca tcg gcc aa-3′, and a control DNA (contDNA) 5′-aac cca tgg aat tca gtt cg-3′, were purchased from Biomers.net GmbH, Germany. All solutions and dilutions were prepared in 10 mM phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution at pH 7.4, containing 138 mM sodium chloride (NaCl), 2.7 mM potassium chloride (KCl).

Methods

[0157] Manufacture of μPAD

[0158] A microfluidic paper-based electroanalytical device (μPED) was prepared as described below using the methods of examples 1 and 2.

[0159] Effective Area Calculation

[0160] In order to know the effective area of the metallized Ag-paper electrodes, the dependence of the peak current on the scan rate was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) sweeping the potential from −0.8 to +1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl at 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 mV.Math.s−1. As the inset in FIG. 6 shows, a standard Ag/AgCl reference electrode (Fisherbrand Accumet model from FisherScientific, NL) and a graphite rod (Sigma Aldrich), as counter electrode, were placed close to the surface of the Ag—Si paper electrode (2 cm×2 cm of geometric area) which acts as working electrode. The electrochemical cell was connected to the potentiostat (PalmSens3 model from PalmSens, UK) with crocodile clamps. Then, 1 mL of 1 mM K.sub.4Fe(CN).sub.6 solution in 0.1 M KCl was slowly added on the paper electrode, wetting the whole electrochemical cell and avoiding solvent evaporation during the experiment.

[0161] According to the Randles-Sevcick equation for a flat electrode and for diffusion-controlled processes at 25° C. [44-47]:

ip=(2.69.Math.105)n.sup.3/2AD.sup.1/2Cν.sup.1/2

[0162] Under the same conditions, for adsorption-controlled processes:

ip=(2.69.Math.105)n.sup.3/2AD.sup.1/2Cν

[0163] where ip is the peak current (A), n is the number of electrons transferred (n=1 for ferrocyanide), A the effective area of the electrode (cm.sup.2), D is the diffusion coefficient of ferrocyanide in aqueous solutions (6.50.Math.10.sup.−6 cm.sup.2.Math.s.sup.−1), C is the concentration (1.Math.10.sup.−6 mol.Math.cm.sup.−3) and ν is the scan rate (V.Math.s.sup.−1).

[0164] Cyclic voltammograms, as those shown in FIG. 6A, were recorded using five different paper substrates without washings between scans. The gradient of the logarithmic plot peak current intensity vs. the scan rate (FIG. 6B) is 0.67±0.08 (R.sup.2=0.997) and 0.67±0.09 (R.sup.2=0.996), for anodic and cathodic processes, respectively. It is noted that these values do not correspond to the value of 1 as expected for adsorbed electroactive species, or to the value of 0.5 associated with the semi-infinite diffusion of the electroactive species to the electrode. Compton et al. observed a similar behaviour for the detection of nicotine on pyrolytic graphite electrodes modified with layers of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. They obtained a gradient of 0.69 which is indicative of a possible mixed mass transport regime with thin-layer diffusion within the porous conductive layer, and semi-infinite diffusion outside the layer in solution [48]. Ag—Si paper electrode is also a porous material with channels and pores of variable dimensions and mixed behaviour can be observed.

[0165] Readjusting the Randles-Sevcik equation with the experimental gradient values, calculated effective areas were 8.2±0.4 cm.sup.2 and 8.6±0.6 cm.sup.2 from anodic and cathodic data, respectively. These values are at least the double of the geometric area (4.0 cm.sup.2).

[0166] Evaluation of Implemented Sensing Device

[0167] Cyclic (CV) and square wave voltammetry (SWV) analyses have been performed at room temperature with a handheld potentiostat PalmSens.sub.3 (PalmSens BV, The Netherlands) with the supplied PSTrace 5.3 software in a three-electrode setup. Prior to the DNA measurements with SWV, the electrode surfaces were pre-treated with cyclic voltammetry to ensure a clean electrode surface. The used pulse amplitude for SWV analysis was 50 mV with a step potential of 2 mV a frequency of 10 Hz, and a potential range between −0.2 and −0.50 V.

Results

[0168] In this work, a novel μPED has been designed (FIG. 5A) to demonstrate the proof-of-concept of MB-based DNA analysis. It contains three autocatalytically deposited Ag electrodes, serving as dual working electrodes (WE) and one common counter electrode (CE), and a Ag/AgCl pseudo-reference electrode (RE). As explained above, the effective area of metallized Ag paper electrodes has been calculated using the Randles-Sevcik equation with experimentally measured gradient values 0.67±0.09, demonstrating there is an effective area 2.1 times greater than the geometric area (FIG. 6). In order to prevent an ohmic drop in the μPED device, which can occur due to the foam-like structure of the autocatalytically deposited electrodes, the reference electrode is prepared separately and laminated directly under both working electrodes (FIG. 5B). Lamination can be achieved using any thermoplastic with an appropriate glass transition temperature, such as a polyethylene film.

[0169] FIG. 5C illustrates CVs of an autocatalytically deposited Ag electrode in 10 mM PBS and 2.5 mg ml.sup.−1 methylene blue (MB) with a scan rate of 100 mV s.sup.−1.

[0170] The redox reaction of methylene blue (blue) to leucomethylene blue (colourless) is given in equation 2.

Methylene blue+H.sup.++e.sup.−Leucomethylene blue+Cl.sup.−

[0171] SWV measurements of MB in a concentration range of 10 to 2500 μg ml.sup.−1 were subsequently performed (FIG. 5D) and a calibration curve was recorded (FIG. 5E). The obtained current is linearly dependent on the MB concentration. The detection limit was less than 50 μg ml.sup.−1 (1.56 μM) along with a linear behaviour up to a concentration of 1 mg ml.sup.−1 (31.26 μM). For the DNA measurement, a MB concentration of 250 μg ml.sup.−1 (7.82 μM) was selected. FIG. 5F shows the current signals of SWV measurements (N=5) with solely MB, after adding in a row 1 μM capture DNA, 1 μM control DNA and 1 μM target DNA. The SWV measurement with DNA is provided in FIG. 7. The inventors results have demonstrated the quantification of the hybridization of complementary DNA strains in the presence of another oligo, also exhibiting the selectivity of this approach.

[0172] Further research will concentrate on the combination of this approach along with an amplification technique (e.g., isothermal amplification due to its on-site applicability) as well as the investigation of DNA biomarkers (e.g., Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) in the case of Johne's disease) in real samples.

Example 6—Electrochemical Transducer for Biosensing

Materials

[0173] SA, HRP, ferrocenecarboxylic acid (FCA), Avidin, HABA were from Sigma-Aldrich. EZ-Link NHS-Biotin and Zeba spin desalting columns (7K MWCO) were from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Amicon Ultracel-10 was from Millipore. Other common chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich unless specified.

Methods

[0174] The reactive NHS-biotin was conjugated to lysine residues of HPR in phosphate buffer saline (PBS). A series of different NHS-biotin:protein molar ratios were performed to achieve the desired biotinylated level (close to 1 biotin per enzyme molecule). The excessive NHS-biotin was removed using the Zebra spin column. The biotinylation was quantitated using HABA pulling assay. The biotin-conjugated HRP was then transferred to the electrochemical reaction solution (ECRS) containing 2 mM FCA in PBS using the Amicon column. Concentrations of biotinylated HRP were determined using absorbance at 402 nm with an extinction coefficient value ε.sup.402=102×103 M.sup.−1cm.sup.−1 [48]. A strip of the AuPE (approximately 3 mm wide and 15 mm long) was dipped into a well of a 96-well microtiter plate containing 200 μl of 1 μM of SA in 5 mM Borax buffer for 2 hours. The AuPE strip was then washed by consecutive dipping for 2 minutes each in 3 wells of 300 μl of ECRS.

Results

[0175] The exceptionally strong affinity of the biotin and streptavidin (SA) interaction has long been exploited for protein and nucleic acid labelling and immobilisation, forming the basis of robust and sensitive biosensors. The SA can be immobilized on a working electrode (WE) by physical adsorption, providing higher surface density than covalent attachment [35]. Biotinylated biomolecules then bind to SA-coated electrodes, taking advantage of the high affinity (K.sub.d=10-15M) and fast kinetics of biotin-streptavidin reaction [36]. The effectiveness of SA-biotin interaction and biomolecule immobilization can be tested by adding an electroactive species to the solution such as iron complexes, since increasing the amount of proteins may hamper the electron transfer and diffusion of the reporter to the electrode [37]. Following the methods described in examples 1 and 2, the high surface area and conductivity of paper with autocatalytic Au results in a promising transducer for electrochemical biosensing.

[0176] Paper with autocatalytic Au (WE) has been coated with SA and dipped in 200 μL of electrochemical reaction solution (ECRS, see FIG. 8), which contains biotinylated protein and ferrocenecarboxylic acid (FCA) as the electrochemical reporter. In this case, the protein is horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated through one of its lysine groups to biotin with a short spacer (13.5 Å). To complete the electrochemical cell, the Ag/AgCl reference electrode (RE) and a Pt wire counter electrode (CE) are dipped in the solution (inset in FIG. 5G) and electrochemical measurements are performed by cyclic (CV) and square wave (SWV) voltammetries using an Ivium potentiostat. The electrochemical interactions of FCA with metallized gold paper are shown in FIG. 9. Cyclic voltammograms in FIG. 5G reveal a marked decrease in the peak current intensity of 40% (both anodic and cathodic processes) when the electrode is coated with SA, and another 30% once biotinylated HRP is added, meaning that an efficient immobilization of SA and interaction SA-biotinylated protein took place. The amount of biotinylated protein required to cover all the available binding sites was studied by square wave voltammetry (SWV) in ECR solution with increasing volumes of 5 μM HRP-biotin from 2 to 10 μl. Recorded voltammograms are shown in FIG. 5H, where no significant effects in the signal are observed with the increase in concentration. A volume of 2 μl (50 nM) is therefore enough for effective immobilization of proteins on the electrode through SA-biotin interaction. The potential of this ultra-low cost metal-fabric substrate has thus been demonstrated for the development of electrochemical biosensors based on SA-biotinylated protein immobilization (e.g. enzymes or antibodies).

Example 7—SERS Substrate

Methods

[0177] The surface of metal nanoparticles inside paper was modified with a thiol ligand by submersing in a 0.1 M NaOH solution with 1 mM 4-mercatobenzoic acid (MBA) for 24 hours to functionalise the surface. Raman measurements were then made in a confocal Raman microscope (WiTEC) with a bright field objective (Zeiss 100×NA 0.9), with 1.2 mW laser at 633 nm. Solutions of pH 4, 7 and 13 were prepared using HCl and NaOH, in which the sample was submerged to either protonate or deprotonate the carboxyl moiety of MBA.

Results

[0178] Surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is a promising chemical sensing technique, providing molecule-specific information with high sensitivity. Multiple species can be studied simultaneously, as well as single analytes, since molecular vibrations are readily distinguishable thanks to typically narrow signal. Widespread adoption of SERS as an analytical technique is still limited, however, due to its drawbacks including robustness, stability and reproducibility.

[0179] SERS active substrates increase characteristic Raman spectra by 10.sup.8 and are typically etched, nanoparticle or nanostructured copper, silver or gold. They are mostly prepared by physical deposition methods, not with wet chemistry as in our case, which provide rough but well-defined surfaces that provide a strong enhancement of the Raman signal. Gold and silver nanospheres are the most frequently used system for SERS applications and, while there is an inherent trade-off favouring simplicity over sensitivity, signal enhancement can be obtained with self-assembled clusters of nanospheres [38-41]. Here we present a novel SERS substrate capable of performing reproducible, high throughput and sensitivity SERS measurement, while being stable and resistant in harsh chemical environments. Production can easily be scaled to printed large-area manufacture, rectifying the high price-point that blocks widespread application of SERS devices [42]. Having a hydrophilic substrate for metal nanoparticles also has several proven advantages such as enhanced mass transport, low dosage and high throughput compared to conventional SERS systems [43].

[0180] Silver and gold paper substrates have been demonstrated as effective SERS substrates by functionalising with the Raman marker 4-MBA, which is characterised by peaks at 1,100 and 1,590 cm.sup.−1 in FIG. 10. Measurements to sense pH have been carried out to demonstrate the large numbers of molecules hosted by the gold paper substrate. As previously reported, changes in 4-MBA Raman spectra are due to protonation of its carboxylic acid end group, giving rise to the vibrational mode at 1,430 cm.sup.−1 in FIG. 5I and 5J [41].

Example 8—Gas Sensor

Methods

[0181] Silver-based metallic paper was produced using the methods of example 1 and example 2 to provide a rectangle of silver paper which was roughly 2 cm×1 cm. The silver paper was connected to a custom-built ohm-meter using crocodile clips disposed either side of the silver paper to measure its conductance when exposed to a gaseous analyte. The device was inserted inside a homemade gas sensor test chamber which could introduce variable concentrations of gases using mass flow controllers.

[0182] The high purity calibration gases were purchased from a commercial vendor and used in the experiments without further modifications. The source gases containing the analyte were diluted with high purity dry air. Accordingly, the gas sensor was alternatively exposed to woo standard cubic centimetre per minute (sccm) of dry air (“Air”) or 900 sccm dry air and 100 sccm of 1% NO.sub.2 in N.sub.2, i.e. 0.1% NO.sub.2 (“NO.sub.2”).

Results

[0183] The results are shown in FIG. 13 and demonstrate sensitivity towards NO.sub.2 using an Ag-impregnated paper substrate. In particular, the curve shows a clear linear response, whereby the resistance increases during exposure to a gas mixture containing NO.sub.2. This is due to an irreversible reaction with NO.sub.2 at the surface of the metal-impregnated paper. This irreversible binding is particularly useful, as the device measures the cumulative exposure to NO.sub.2, meaning that, although continuous readout is possible, it does not require continuous power from the mobile handset. Rather the cumulative exposure can be read out intermittently, meaning that there will be minimal impact in the battery life of the handset, as well as reducing the noise in the signal.

CONCLUSION

[0184] An electroless deposition technique has been presented that is capable of depositing a wide range of metals inside fabric materials, such as paper and cotton, using a printed precursor silicon ink. The resultant metallic fabrics are highly conductive, electroactive, hydrophilic, flexible, porous and ultra-low cost. These material properties have then been implemented for fabric-based devices capable of energy storage and wireless power. Applications have been demonstrated in electrochemical DNA sensing and transduction for biosensing, and as a plasmonic SERS substrate.

[0185] Wirelessly powered (<0.4 W) fabric-based devices are enabled with autocatalytically deposited NFC antenna, retaining a disposably cheap price point. Autocatalytic metal fabrics combined with electroplating enable fabric batteries, combining high surface-area and high hydrophilicity for compact dry storage.

[0186] The feasibility of an electrochemical paper-based analytical device for methylene blue based DNA detection was successfully demonstrated by the proof-of-principle measurements using square wave voltammetry. The potential of the ultra-low cost metal-fabric substrate has been demonstrated for the development of electrochemical biosensors based on SA-biotinylated protein immobilization, and as promising substrate for SERS measurements, applied here to pH sensing. Further biosensing work will optimise the system optimization for signal reproducibility and integrate real-time nucleic acid amplification, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or isothermal amplification, for point-of-care testing of pathogens.

REFERENCES

[0187] 1. D. Tobjörk and R. Österbacka, Adv. Mater. 23, 1935 (2011).

[0188] 2. J. W. Park and S. G. Baek, Scr. Mater. 55, 1139 (2006).

[0189] 3. P. Andersson, D. Nilsson, P. O. Svensson, M. Chen, A. Malmström, T. Remonen, T. Kugler, and M. Berggren, Adv. Mater. 14, 1460 (2002).

[0190] 4. A. Denneulin, A. Blayo, J. Bras, and C. Neuman, Prog. Org. Coatings 63, 87 (2008).

[0191] 5. G.-W. Huang, S. H. Xiao, and S. Fu, Nanoscale 6, 8495 (2014).

[0192] 6. F. Gilder, A. Ainla, J. Redston, B. Mosadegh, A. Glavan, T. J. Martin, and G. M. Whitesides, Angew. Chemie—Int. Ed. 55, 5727 (2016).

[0193] 7. Y. Gao, X. Deng, W. Wen, X. Zhang, and S. Wang, Biosens. Bioelectron. 92, 529 (2017).

[0194] 8. A. S. Aricò, P. Bruce, B. Scrosati, J.-M. Tarascon, and W. van Schalkwijk, Nat. Mater. 4, 366 (2005).

[0195] 9. E. D. Parent, C. S. Purinton, and S. W. Sutter, (1985).

[0196] 10. K. L. Choy, Prog. Mater. Sci. 48, 57 (2003).

[0197] 11. F. Erogbogbo, T. Lin, P. M. Tucciarone, K. M. Lajoie, L. Lai, G. D. Patki, P. N. Prasad, and M. T. Swihart, Nano Lett. 13, 451 (2013).

[0198] 12. A. Eyer, N. Schillinger, I. Reis, and A. Räuber, J. Cryst. Growth 104, 119 (1990).

[0199] 13. Q. U. Jiuhui, J. Environ. Sci. (China) 20, 1 (2008).

[0200] 14. N. O'Farrell, A. Houlton, and B. R. Horrocks, Int. J. Nanomedicine 1, 451 (2006).

[0201] 15. Y. Xia, N. Venkateswaran, D. Qin, and J. Tien, Langmuir 6, 363 (1998).

[0202] 16. K. Peng, Z. Huang, and J. Zhu, Adv. Mater. 16, 73 (2004).

[0203] 17. B. Huang, J. Wang, S. Huo, and W. Cai, 81 (2008).

[0204] 18. G. Peter, W. Fixter, F. Gb, D. Robert, F. Gb, N. Damerell, F. Gb, and S. G. Appleton, US 2004/0146647 A1 (2004).

[0205] 19. M. M. Hamedi, A. Ainla, F. Güder, D. C. Christodoules, M. T. Fernandez-Abedul, and G. M. Whitesides, Adv. Mater. 28, 5054 (2016).

[0206] 20. Y. Wang, H. Guo, J. J. Chen, E. Sowade, Y. Wang, K. Liang, K. Marcus, R. R. Baumann, and Z. S. Feng, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 26112 (2016).

[0207] 21. Z. Huang, N. Geyer, P. Werner, J. De Boor, and U. Gösele, Adv. Mater. 23, 285 (2011).

[0208] 22. L. A. Nagahara, T. Ohmori, K. Hashimoto, and A. Fujishima, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vacuum, Surfaces, Film. 11, 763 (1993).

[0209] 23. K. Q. Peng, Y. J. Yan, S. P. Gao, and J. Zhu, Adv. Mater. 14, 1164 (2002).

[0210] 24. K. Peng, J. Hu, Y. Yan, Y. Wu, H. Fang, Y. Xu, S. Lee, and J. Zhu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 16, 387 (2006).

[0211] 25. Y. Xuan, M. Sandberg, M. Berggren, and X. Crispin, Org. Electron. 13, 632 (2012).

[0212] 26. G. Nyström, A. Razaq, M. Strømme, L. Nyholm, and A. Mihranyan, Nano Lett. 9, 3635 (2009).

[0213] 27. S. H. Ng, J. Wang, Z. P. Guo, J. Chen, G. X. Wang, and H. K. Liu, Electrochim. Acta 51, 23 (2005).

[0214] 28. L. Hu, H. Wu, F. La Mantia, Y. Yang, and Y. Cui, ACS Nano 4, 5843 (2010).

[0215] 29. N. Izmailov and M. Shraiber, Farmatsiya 3, 1 (1938).

[0216] 30. P. Lisowski and P. K. Zarzycki, Chromatographia 76, 1201 (2013).

[0217] 31. C. Dincer, R. Bruch, A. Kling, P. S. Dittrich, and G. A. Urban, Trends Biotechnol. 35, 728 (2017).

[0218] 32. A. Ziegler, A. Koch, K. Krockenberger, and A. Graßhennig, Hum. Genet. 131, 1627 (2012).

[0219] 33. T. H. Fang, N. Ramalingam, D. Xian-Dui, T. S. Ngin, Z. Xianting, A. T. Lai Kuan, E. Y. Peng Huat, and G. Hai-Qing, Biosens. Bioelectron. 24, 2131 (2009).

[0220] 34. A. S. Patterson, K. Hsieh, H. T. Soh, and K. W. Plaxco, Trends Biotechnol. 31, 704 (2013).

[0221] 35. S. Li, H. Liu, and N. He, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10, 4875 (2010).

[0222] 36. P. Weber, D. Ohlendorf, J. Wendoloski, and F. Salemme, Science (80-.). 243, 85 (1989).

[0223] 37. S. E. Moulton, J. N. Barisci, A. Bath, R. Stella, and G. G. Wallace, Electrochim. Acta 49, 4223 (2004).

[0224] 38. C. Hamon and L. M. Liz-Marzán, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 512, 834 (2017).

[0225] 39. D. M. Solís, J. M. Taboada, F. Obelleiro, L. M. Liz-Marzán, and F. J. García De Abajo, ACS Photonics 4, 329 (2017).

[0226] 40. P. A. Mosier-boss, (2017).

[0227] 41. A. Lauri, L. Velleman, X. Xiao, E. Cortés, J. B. Edel, V. Giannini, A. Rakovich, and S. A. Maier, ACS Photonics 4, 2070 (2017).

[0228] 42. J. F. Betz, W. W. Yu, Y. Cheng, I. M. White, and G. W. Rubloff, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 2224 (2014).

[0229] 43. J. Shao, L. Tong, S. Tang, Z. Guo, H. Zhang, P. Li, H. Wang, C. Du, and X. F. Yu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 5391 (2015).

[0230] 44. T. R. L. C. Paix??o, D. Lowinsohn, and M. Bertotti, J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 3072 (2006).

[0231] 45. M. Lukaszewski, M. Soszko, and A. Czerwiriski, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 11, 4442 (2016).

[0232] 46. S. Trasatti and O. A. Petrii, J. Electroanal. Chem. 327, 353 (1992).

[0233] 47. A. J. Bard and L. R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications (2001).

[0234] 48. A. T. Smith, S. A. Sanders, R. N. F. Thorneley, J. F. Burke, and R. R. C. Bray, Eur. J. Biochem. 207, 507 (1992).