METHOD FOR LASER SURFACE TREATMENT OF FURNACE FURNITURE
20210114141 · 2021-04-22
Assignee
Inventors
- David Thomas Allan Matthews (Borne, NL)
- Josephus Theodorus Maria DE HOSSON (Marum, NL)
- Ondrej NENADL (Groningen, NL)
- Václav OCELÏK (Groningen, NL)
Cpc classification
B23K26/34
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F27D3/024
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B23K2103/26
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23K26/123
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F23R2900/00019
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F27D25/005
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B23P6/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F23J3/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B23K2103/50
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A method for a laser surface treatment of furnace furniture of a heating furnace, which furnace furniture is used for the support of metal products in the heating furnace, the method including the steps of: setting a laser device to generate a laser beam of a pre-defined power, guiding the laser beam over the surface of the furnace furniture with a pre-defined velocity, such that the surface of the furnace furniture is heated locally to above its melting temperature.
Claims
1. A method for a laser surface treatment of furnace furniture of a heating furnace, which furnace furniture is used for the support of metal products in the heating furnace, wherein the furnace furniture is made of a creep resistant Ni—Cr alloy, the method comprising the steps of: setting a laser device to generate a laser beam of a pre-defined power in a range sufficient to deliver a fluence in a range of 1.3×10.sup.6-1.3×10.sup.8 J/m.sup.2, guiding the laser beam over the surface of the furnace furniture with a pre-defined velocity, such that the surface of the furnace furniture is heated locally to above its melting temperature.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the laser device and/or the laser beam and the furnace furniture are moved with respect to each other.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein one or more laser devices are used to generate multiple laser beams.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the laser beam or multiple laser beams are each guided in a single track or in multiple tracks over the surface of the furnace furniture.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the tracks of the laser beam or laser beams run parallel to each other.
6. The method according to claim 4, wherein adjacent tracks of the laser beam or laser beams overlap.
7. The method according to claim 4, wherein the laser device or the laser devices are controlled such that the generated laser beam or laser beams result in tracks with a width in a range of 1-6 mm.
8. The method according to claim 4, wherein the overlap of adjacent tracks of the laser beam or laser beams is in the range of 20-80%.
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein continuous or pulsed laser beam or laser beams are used.
10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the velocity of the movement of the laser beam or the laser beams and the furnace furniture with respect to each other is in a range of 5-100 mm/s.
11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the velocity of the movement of the laser beam or the laser beams and the furnace furniture with respect to each other is in the range of 5-50 mm/s.
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the laser surface treatment is carried out under a protective atmosphere.
13. The method according to claim 10, wherein the protective atmosphere is an argon atmosphere.
14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the furnace furniture is made from Ni—Cr alloys wherein the Ni+Cr content is in a range of 50-90%.
15. The method according to claim 1, wherein the laser surface treatment is followed by a mechanical surface treatment.
16. The method according to any of claim 4, wherein the laser device or the laser devices are controlled such that the generated laser beam or laser beams result in tracks with a width in a range of 2-5 mm.
17. The method according to any of claim 4, wherein overlap of adjacent tracks of the laser beam or laser beams is between 40-80%.
18. The method according to any of claim 4, wherein overlap of adjacent tracks of the laser beam or laser beams is between 60-70%.
19. The method according to claim 1, wherein the furnace furniture is made from Ni—Cr alloys wherein the Ni+Cr content is in a range of 75-85%.
20. The method according to claim 5, wherein adjacent tracks of the laser beam or laser beams overlap.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0034] The invention will be further explained by means of the example shown in the drawing, in which:
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
EXAMPLE AND DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0041] A particular alloy with the composition given in Table 1 has been tested extensively in static and dynamic high temperature oxidation and wear tests, and compared to the standard material/surface.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Example composition of material tested. Element Ni Cr W Fe C Si Mn wt. % 45~50 30~35 10~20 1.0~2.0 0.35~0.45 0.25~0.35 0.05~0.15
[0042] A series of laser processing parameters has been followed utilising a 3 kW continuous wave solid-state fibre laser by IPG Photonics with a wavelength of 1.07 μm, 4 axis CNC table and delivery of a shielding gas (argon). Defocusing of the laser beam was tuned to obtain single laser track width of slightly more than 3 mm.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Typical laser processing parameters during trials Surface Speed (mm/s) Laser Power (W) 5 300-1100 20 1000-1800 100 2000-3000
[0043] The combination of laser parameters as given in Table 2 can be used to determine the fluence or the energy delivered to the surface of the part being processed in J/m2 which provides an energy density for the process, see Table 3. The test has been carried out on a round bar wherein the round bar is rotated resulting in the given surface speed.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 processing parameters, power density and fluence Power Speed Beam radius Power density Processing Fluence [W] [mm/s] [mm] W/m{circumflex over ( )}2 time [s] (J/m{circumflex over ( )}2) 300 5 1.5 4.24E+07 0.6 2.55E+07 1100 5 1.5 1.56E+08 0.6 9.34E+07 1000 20 1.5 1.41E+08 0.15 2.12E+07 1800 20 1.5 2.55E+08 0.15 3.82E+07 2000 100 1.5 2.83E+08 0.03 8.49E+06 3000 100 1.5 4.24E+08 0.03 1.27E+07
[0044]
[0045] The series of process parameters reveal a good surface quality, without any porosity or cracking and a well-defined interface between re-melted regions and the bulk material. The exception were tracks produced at highest scanning speed 100 mm/s which all had severe cracking.
[0046] The given composition is characterised by a cast microstructure having a dendritic microstructure with eutectic solidified between the dendrites. Laser re-melting results in a considerable decrease in the size of the dendrites for all scanning speeds and laser powers.
[0047]
[0048]
[0049] By overlapping the tracks of individual re-melted tracks re-melted layers can be formed of any length and width. The depth of such layers is determined as the minimum amount of re-melted depth corresponding to overlapped regions.
[0050] A combination of EDS mapping and electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD) has been used to identify individual phases present on a micro-scale. Ni and Fe predominantly forms the dendrites and Cr, W and Mn have a higher concentration in the eutectic where this phase alternates with the Ni-rich phase. Further, it has been shown that carbon is more abundant in the chromium and tungsten rich phases, forming carbides. The main phases are Ni solid solution, Cr—C phase(s) and W—C phase(s) and W dissolved in Cr23C6 phases.
[0051] Hardness tests have shown a 15% increase in hardness after laser re-melting but no noticeable variation with laser power (after re-melting hardness=390-425 HV2.5; cast material=300-360 HV2.5.
[0052] Isothermal testing was conducted using a simple heat induction furnace at ambient air and pressure at a temperature of 1200° C. for up to 8 days. During this thermal testing, an upper part of the re-melted layer developed porosity with the remainder of the layer unaffected.