Method for producing non-oriented electrical steel sheet having excellent magnetic properties

Abstract

Methods for producing non-oriented electrical steel sheets comprising steps including hot rolling a slab having a chemical composition comprising C: not more than 0.01 mass %, Si: not more than 6 mass %, Mn: 0.05-3 mass %, P: not more than 0.2 mass %, Al: not more than 2 mass %, N: not more than 0.005 mass %, S: not more than 0.01 mass %, Ga: not more than 0.0005 mass %, and the remainder being Fe and inevitable impurities, pickling without conducting hot band annealing or after conducting hot band annealing or self-annealing, subjecting to one or more cold rollings including an intermediate annealing therebetween and a finish annealing, and forming an insulation coating, an average heating rate from 500 to 800° C. in the heating process of the finish annealing is not less than 50° C./s, whereby a non-oriented electrical steel sheet having excellent magnetic properties is obtained even if hot band annealing is omitted.

Claims

1. A method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet comprising a series of steps of hot rolling a slab having a chemical composition comprising C: not more than 0.01 mass %, Si: not more than 6 mass %, Mn: 0.05-3 mass %, P: not more than 0.2 mass %, Al: not more than 0.005 mass %, N: not more than 0.005 mass %, S: not more than 0.01 mass %, Ga: 0.0001-0.0005 mass %, and the remainder being Fe and inevitable impurities, pickling without conducting a hot band annealing, after conducting a self-annealing by coiling at a temperature of not lower than 650° C., subjecting to a single cold rolling or two or more cold rollings including an intermediate annealing therebetween and a finish annealing, and forming an insulation coating, characterized in that an average heating rate from 500 to 800° C. in the heating process during the finish annealing is not less than 50° C/s.

2. The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein the slab contains one or two of Sn: 0.01-0.2 mass % and Sb: 0.01-0.2 mass % in addition to the chemical composition.

3. The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 2, wherein the slab contains one or more selected from Ca: 0.0005-0.03 mass %, REM: 0.0005-0.03 mass %, and Mg: 0.0005-0.03 mass % in addition to the chemical composition.

4. The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 3, wherein the slab contains one or more selected from Ni: 0.01-2.0 mass %, Co: 0.01-2.0 mass %, Cu: 0.03-5.0 mass %, and Cr: 0.05-5.0 mass % in addition to the above chemical composition.

5. The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 3, wherein the non-oriented electrical steel sheet has an iron loss W.sub.15/50 of not more than 3.32 W/Kg and a magnetic flux density B.sub.50 of not less than 1.702T.

6. The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 2, wherein the slab contains one or more selected from Ni: 0.01-2.0 mass %, Co: 0.01-2.0 mass %, Cu: 0.03-5.0 mass %, and Cr: 0.05-5.0 mass % in addition to the above chemical composition.

7. The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 3, wherein the non-oriented electrical steel sheet has an iron loss W.sub.15/50 of not more than 3.32 W/Kg and a magnetic flux density B.sub.50 of not less than 1.702T.

8. The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein the slab contains one or more selected from Ca: 0.0005-0.03 mass %, REM: 0.0005-0.03 mass % and Mg: 0.0005-0.03 mass % in addition to the chemical composition.

9. The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 8, wherein the slab contains one or more selected from Ni: 0.01-2.0 mass %, Co: 0.01-2.0 mass %, Cu: 0.03-5.0 mass %, and Cr: 0.05-5.0 mass % in addition to the above chemical composition.

10. The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 8, wherein the non-oriented electrical steel sheet has an iron loss W.sub.15/50 of not more than 3.32 W/Kg and a magnetic flux density B.sub.50 of not less than 1.702T.

11. The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein the slab contains one or more selected from Ni: 0.01-2.0 mass %, Co: 0.01-2.0 mass %, Cu: 0.03-5.0 mass % and Cr: 0.05-5.0 mass % in addition to the above chemical composition.

12. The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein the non-oriented electrical steel sheet has an iron loss W.sub.15/50 of not more than 3.32 W/Kg and a magnetic flux density B.sub.50 of not less than 1.702T.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a graph showing an influence of Ga content upon a magnetic flux density B.sub.50.

(2) FIG. 2 is a graph showing an influence of Al content upon a magnetic flux density B.sub.50.

(3) FIG. 3 is a graph showing an influence of an average heating rate in a finish annealing upon a magnetic flux density B.sub.50.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

(4) First, experiments building a momentum on the development of the invention will be described.

(5) <Experiment 1>

(6) The inventors have investigated the influence of Ga content as an inevitable impurity upon the magnetic flux density to develop a non-oriented electrical steel sheet having excellent magnetic properties even if the hot-band annealing is omitted.

(7) Steels prepared by variously changing an addition amount of Ga within a range of tr.-0.002 mass % in a chemical composition system comprising C: 0.0025 mass %, Si: 3.0 mass %, Mn: 0.25 mass %, P: 0.01 mass %, N: 0.002 mass %, S: 0.002 mass % and Al: two levels of 0.2 mass % and 0.002 mass % are melted and casted in a laboratorial way to form steel ingots, which are hot rolled to form hot rolled sheets of 3.0 mm in thickness and subjected to a heat treatment corresponding to a coiling temperature of 750° C. Thereafter, the hot rolled sheets are pickled without conducting a hot band annealing and cold rolled to form cold rolled sheets having a thickness of 0.50 mm, which are subjected to a finish annealing at 1000° C. for 10 seconds under an atmosphere of 20 vol % H.sub.2-80 vol % N.sub.2. Moreover, an average heating rate from 500 to 800° C. in the finish annealing is set to 70° C./s.

(8) Magnetic flux densities B.sub.50 of the thus obtained steel sheets after the finish annealing are measured by a 25 cm Epstein method to obtain results shown in FIG. 1.

(9) It can be seen from the results that the magnetic flux density B.sub.50 is rapidly increased when the Ga content is not more than 0.0005 mass %, and the effect of increasing the magnetic flux density due to the decrease of Ga content is larger when Al content is 0.002 mass % than 0.2 mass %.

(10) <Experiment 2>

(11) The inventors have conducted an experiment to investigate the influence of Al content upon the magnetic flux density.

(12) Steels prepared by variously changing an addition amount of Al within a range of tr.-0.01 mass % in a chemical composition system comprising C: 0.0025 mass %, Si: 3.0 mass %, Mn: 0.25 mass %, P: 0.01 mass %, N: 0.002 mass %, S: 0.002 mass % and Ga decreased to 0.0002 mass % are melted in a laboratorial way and magnetic flux densities B.sub.50 of the steel sheets after the finish annealing are measured by a 25 cm Epstein method in the same way as in Experiment 1.

(13) FIG. 2 shows the relationship between Al content and magnetic flux density B.sub.50 with respect to the above measured results. As seen from FIG. 2, the magnetic flux density is increased when Al content is not more than 0.005 mass %.

(14) As seen from the above experimental results, the magnetic flux density can be significantly increased by decreasing Ga content to not more than 0.0005 mass % and further by decreasing Ga content to not more than 0.0005 mass % while decreasing Al content to not more than 0.005 mass %.

(15) The reason why the magnetic flux density is significantly increased by the decreases of Ga content and/or Al content is not entirely clear, but we believe that the recrystallization temperature of the raw material is lowered by decreasing Ga to change recrystallization behavior in the hot rolling to thereby improve the texture of the hot rolled sheet. Particularly, the reason why the magnetic flux density is considerably increased when Al content is not more than 0.005 mass % is believed due to the fact that mobility of grain boundary is changed by the decrease of Ga and Al to promote growth of crystal orientation advantageous for the magnetic properties.

(16) The invention is developed based on the above new knowledge.

(17) <Experiment 3>

(18) Next, the inventors have conducted an experiment to investigate the influence of the heating rate in the finish annealing upon the magnetic flux density.

(19) Steels containing C: 0.0025 mass %, Si: 3.0 mass %, Mn: 0.25 mass %, P: 0.01 mass %, N: 0.002 mass %, S: 0.002 mass %, Al: 0.002 mass %, and Ga: two levels of 0.0001 mass % and 0.001 mass % are melted in a laboratorial way and magnetic flux densities B.sub.50 of the steel sheets after the finish annealing are measured by a 25 cm Epstein apparatus in the same way as in Experiment 1. In this regard, an average heating rate from 500 to 800° C. in the finish annealing is varied within a range of 20-300° C./s.

(20) FIG. 3 shows a relationship between the average heating rate in the finish annealing and magnetic flux density B.sub.50 with respect to the above measured results.

(21) As seen from FIG. 3, the magnetic flux density B.sub.50 is substantially constant irrespective of the heating rate in the steel sheet having Ga content of 0.001 mass %, while the magnetic flux density B.sub.50 is increased in the steel sheet with Ga content decreased to 0.0001 mass % when the heating rate is not less than 50° C./s. It can be seen from the above experimental results that the magnetic flux density can be further increased by decreasing Ga content to not more than 0.0005 mass % and Al content to not more than 0.005 mass % while increasing the average heating rate in the finish annealing to not less than 50° C./s. The reason why the magnetic flux density is significantly increased by decreasing Ga content and increasing the heating rate is not entirely clear at this moment, but it is considered due to the fact that recrystallization of {110} grains and {100} grains promoted by the rapid heating is further expedited by the decrease of Ga to increase grains having an orientation of an easy magnetization axis.

(22) The invention is developed based on the above new knowledge.

(23) Next, there will be explained a chemical composition required in the slab used in the production of the non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to an aspect of the invention.

(24) C: not more than 0.01 mass %

(25) C causes magnetic aging in a product sheet, so that it is limited to not more than 0.01 mass %. Preferably, it is not more than 0.005 mass %, and more preferably not more than 0.003 mass %.

(26) Si: not more than 6 mass %

(27) Si is an element effective to increase a specific resistance of steel to decrease an iron loss, so that it is preferable to be contained in an amount of not less than 1 mass %. When it is added in an amount exceeding 6 mass %, however, it is difficult to perform cold rolling because considerable embrittlement is caused, so that the upper limit is set to 6 mass %. Preferably, it falls in a range of 1-4 mass %, and more preferably a range of 1.5-3 mass %.

(28) Mn: 0.05-3 mass %

(29) Mn is an element effective for preventing red brittleness in the hot rolling, and therefore it is required to be contained in an amount of not less than 0.05 mass %. When it exceeds 3 mass %, however, cold rolling property is deteriorated or decrease of the magnetic flux density is caused, so that the upper limit is set to 3 mass %. Preferably, it is a range of 0.05-1.5 mass % More preferably, it is a range of 0.2-1.3 mass %.

(30) P: not more than 0.2 mass %

(31) P can be added because it is excellent in the solid-solution strengthening ability and is an element effective of adjusting hardness to improve punchability of steel. However, when the amount exceeds 0.2 mass %, embrittlement becomes remarkable, so that the upper limit is set to 0.2 mass %. Preferably, it is not more than 0.15 mass %, more preferably not more than 0.1 mass %.

(32) S: not more than 0.01 mass %

(33) S is a harmful element forming sulfide such as MnS or the like to increase the iron loss, so that the upper limit is set to 0.01 mass %. Preferably, it is not more than 0.005 mass %, and more preferably not more than 0.003 mass %.

(34) Al: not more than 2 mass %

(35) Al can be added because it is an element effective in increasing a specific resistance of steel and decreasing an eddy current loss. However, when it exceeds 2.0 mass %, the cold rolling property is deteriorated, so that the upper limit is set to 2.0 mass %.

(36) In order to more receive the effect of improving the magnetic properties by the decrease of Ga, it is effective to be decreased to not more than 0.005 mass %. More preferably, it is not more than 0.001 mass %.

(37) N: not more than 0.005 mass %

(38) N is a harmful element forming nitride to increase the iron loss, so that the upper limit is set to 0.005 mass %. Preferably, it is not more than 0.003 mass %.

(39) Ga: not more than 0.0005 mass %

(40) Ga is an important element because it has a substantial bad influence on a texture of a hot rolled sheet even in a slight amount. To suppress the bad influence, it is not more than 0.0005 mass %. Preferably, it is not more than 0.0003 mass %, more preferably not more than 0.0001 mass %.

(41) The slab used in the production of the non-oriented electrical steel sheet may contain one or two of Sn and Sb in ranges of Sb: 0.01-0.2 mass % and Sn: 0.01-0.2 mass % in addition to the above ingredients for improving the magnetic properties.

(42) Sb and Sn improve a texture of a product sheet and are elements effective for increasing the magnetic flux density. The above effect is obtained in an addition amount of not less than 0.01 mass %. On the other hand, when it exceeds 0.2 mass %, the above effect is saturated. Therefore, when adding the elements, each element is preferable to be a range of 0.01-0.2 mass %. More preferably, it is a range of Sb: 0.02-0.15 mass % and Sn: 0.02-0.15 mass %.

(43) The slab used in the production of the non-oriented electrical steel sheet may further contain one or more selected from Ca, REM and Mg in ranges of Ca: 0.0005-0.03 mass %, REM: 0.0005-0.03 mass % and Mg: 0.0005-0.03 mass % in addition to the above ingredients.

(44) Each of Ca, REM and Mg fixes S to suppress fine precipitation of sulfide and is an element effective for decreasing the iron loss. In order to obtain such an effect, each element may be added in an amount of not less than 0.0005 mass %. However, when it is added in an amount exceeding 0.03 mass %, the effect is saturated. Therefore, in the case of adding Ca, REM and Mg, each element is preferable to be a range of 0.0005-0.03 mass %. More preferably, it is a range of 0.001-0.01 mass %.

(45) The non-oriented electrical steel sheet may further contain one or more selected from Ni, Co, Cu and Cr in ranges of Ni: 0.01-2.0 mass %, Co: 0.01-2.0 mass %, Cu: 0.03-5.0 mass % and Cr: 0.05-5.0 mass % in addition to the above ingredients. Ni, Co, Cu and Cr are elements effective for decreasing the iron loss because each element increases the specific resistance of steel. In order to obtain such an effect, it is preferable to add Ni and Co in an amount of not less than 0.01 mass % for each, Cu in an amount of not less than 0.03 mass % and Cr in an amount of not less than 0.05 mass %. However, when Ni and Co are added in an amount exceeding 2.0 mass % and Cu and Cr are added in an amount exceeding 5.0 mass %, an alloy cost is increased. Therefore, when adding Ni and Co, the addition amount of each preferably falls in a range of 0.01-2.0 mass %, and when adding Cu, the addition amount preferably falls in a range of 0.03-5.0 mass %, and when adding Cr, the addition amount falls in a range of 0.05-5.0 mass %. More preferably, it is Ni: 0.03-1.5 mass %, Co: 0.03-1.5 mass %, Cu: 0.05-3.0 mass % and Cr: 0.1-3.0 mass %.

(46) The remainder other than the above ingredients in the slab used in the production for a non-oriented electrical steel sheet is Fe and inevitable impurities. However, the addition of other elements may be accepted within a range not damaging the desired effects of the invention.

(47) Next, the method of producing the non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to an aspect of the invention will be described below.

(48) The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the invention can be produced by the conventionally well-known production method for the non-oriented electrical steel sheet as long as Ga and Al are contained in the aforementioned ranges as a raw material used in the production. For example, it can be produced by a method wherein a steel adjusted to have the predetermined chemical composition in a refining process of melting the steel in a converter, an electric furnace or the like and performing secondary refining in a vacuum degassing apparatus or the like is subjected to an ingot making-blooming method or continuous casting to form a raw steel material (slab), which is then subjected to hot rolling, pickling, cold rolling, finish annealing, and an application and baking of an insulation coating.

(49) In the production method of the non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the invention, excellent magnetic properties can be obtained even if hot band annealing after hot rolling is omitted. However, hot band annealing may be conducted, and at this time, a soaking temperature is preferable to be a range of 900-1200° C. When the soaking temperature is lower than 900° C., the effect by the hot band annealing cannot be obtained sufficiently and hence the effect of further improving the magnetic properties cannot be obtained. On the other hand, when it exceeds 1200° C., the grain size of the hot rolled sheet is coarsened too much, and there is a fear of causing cracks or fractures during the cold rolling and it becomes disadvantageous to the cost.

(50) When the hot band annealing is omitted, a self-annealing may be performed by increasing a coiling temperature after the hot rolling. The coiling temperature is preferably not lower than 650° C. from a viewpoint of sufficiently recrystallizing the steel sheet before the cold rolling or the hot rolled sheet. More preferably, it is not lower than 670° C.

(51) Also, the cold rolling from the hot rolled sheet to the cold rolled sheet with a product sheet thickness (final thickness) may be conducted once or twice or more interposing an intermediate annealing therebetween. In particular, the final cold rolling to the final thickness preferably adopts a warm rolling performed at a sheet temperature of approximately 200° C. because it has a large effect of increasing the magnetic flux density as long as there is no problem in equipment, production constraint or cost.

(52) The finish annealing applied to the cold rolled sheet with a final thickness is preferably a continuous annealing performed by soaking at a temperature of 900-1150° C. for 5-60 seconds. When the soaking temperature is lower than 900° C., the recrystallization is not promoted sufficiently and good magnetic properties are not obtained. While when it exceeds 1150° C., crystal grains are coarsened and the iron loss at a high frequency zone is particularly increased. More preferably, the soaking temperature falls in a range of 950−1100° C.

(53) It is important to conduct a rapid heating at an average heating rate of not less than 50° C./s from 500° C. to 800° C. in the heating process during the finish annealing. The reason is that recrystallization of {110} and {100} grains promoted by the rapid heating is further expedited by the decrease of Ga to obtain an effect of increasing grains oriented in the easy magnetization axis. It is preferably not less than 100° C./s, more preferably not less than 150° C./s.

(54) Moreover, the method of performing the rapid heating is not particularly limited. For example, a direct electric heating method, an induction heating method and so on can be used.

(55) The steel sheet after the finish annealing is preferably coated on its surface with an insulation coating for increasing interlayer resistance to decrease the iron loss. It is particularly desirable to apply a semi-organic insulation coating containing a resin for ensuring a good punchability.

(56) The non-oriented electrical steel sheet coated with the insulation coating may be used after subjected to a stress relief annealing by users, or may be used without the stress relief annealing. Also, a stress relief annealing may be performed after a punching process is conducted by users. The stress relief annealing is usually performed under a condition at about 750° C. for 2 hours.

Example 1

(57) Steels No. 1-33 having a chemical composition shown in Table 1 are melted in a refining process of convertor-vacuum degassing treatment and continuously casted to form steel slabs, which are heated at a temperature of 1140° C. for 1 hour and hot rolled at a finish hot rolling temperature of 900° C. to form hot rolled sheets having a sheet thickness of 3.0 mm, and wound around a coil at a temperature of 750° C. Next, the coil is pickled without being subjected to a hot band annealing, and cold rolled once to provide a cold rolled sheet having a sheet thickness of 0.5 mm, which is subjected to a finish annealing under a soaking conditions at 1000° C. for 10 seconds to provide a non-oriented electrical steel sheet. The heating rate in the finish annealing is set to 70° C./s.

(58) From the thus obtained steel sheet are taken out Epstein test specimens of 30 mm×280 mm to measure an iron loss W.sub.15/50 and a magnetic flux density B.sub.50 by a 25 cm Epstein apparatus, the results of which are also shown in Table 1.

(59) As seen from Table 1, non-oriented electrical steel sheets having excellent magnetic properties can be obtained by controlling a chemical composition of a raw steel material (slab) and the heating rate in the finish annealing to the ranges herein even if the hot band annealing is omitted.

(60) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Magnetic properties Iron Magnetic loss flux Chemical composition (mass %) W.sub.15/50 density  o C P Si Mn Al N S Ga Sn Sb Ca REM (W/kg) B.sub.50 (T) Remarks  1 0.0029 0.01 3.02 0.255 0.19 0.0019 0.0019 0.0001 — — — — 2.75 1.701 Inventive Example  2 0.0024 0.02 2.97 0.210 0.20 0.0020 0.0018 0.0003 — — — — 2.96 1.673 Inventive Example  3 0.0028 0.01 3.00 0.248 0.006 0.0022 0.0022 0.0001 — — — — 2.79 1.706 Inventive Example  4 0.0025 0.02 2.99 0.251 0.003 0.0020 0.0023 0.0001 — — — — 2.72 1.718 Inventive Example  5 0.0026 0.01 2.97 0.251 0.001 0.0021 0.0021 0.0001 — — — — 2.64 1.731 Inventive Example  6 0.0023 0.02 3.04 0.252 0.18 0.0022 0.0019 0.0007 — — — — 3.23 1.651 Comparative Example  7 0.0024 0.01 3.03 0.251 0.001 0.0017 0.0023 0.0006 — — — — 3.26 1.661 Comparative Example  8 0.0023 0.01 1.52 0.256 0.24 0.0021 0.0024 0.0001 — — — — 3.01 1.738 Inventive Example  9 0.0025 0.02 1.49 0.252 0.007 0.0019 0.0024 0.0001 — — — — 3.06 1.745 Inventive Example 10 0.0025 0.01 1.45 0.254 0.001 0.0018 0.0022 0.0001 — — — — 2.92 1.768 Inventive Example 11 0.0025 0.01 1.54 0.247 0.22 0.0018 0.0016 0.0006 — — — — 3.53 1.687 Comparative Example 12 0.0220 0.02 2.99 0.249 0.26 0.0020 0.0019 0.0001 — — — — 4.04 1.651 Comparative Example 13 0.0028 0.22 2.98 0.252 0.19 0.0023 0.0019 0.0001 — — — — Cannot be Comparative rolled due to Example embrittlement 14 0.0031 0.02 3.03 3.210 0.21 0.0021 0.0021 0.0001 — — — — Cannot be Comparative rolled due to Example embrittlement 15 0.0027 0.02 3.02 0.251 2.21 0.0023 0.0020 0.0001 — — — — Cannot be Comparative rolled due to Example embrittlement 16 0.0028 0.03 2.94 0.255 0.21 0.0054 0.0027 0.0001 — — — — 3.79 1.659 Comparative Example 17 0.0022 0.03 3.05 0.252 0.19 0.0016 0.0130 0.0001 — — — — 3.72 1.661 Comparative Example 18 0.0031 0.02 3.02 0.247 0.001 0.0020 0.0021 0.0001 0.04 — — — 2.58 1.745 Inventive Example 19 0.0035 0.01 2.97 0.256 0.001 0.0021 0.0026 0.0001 — 0.03 — — 2.59 1.743 Inventive Example 20 0.0032 0.02 3.06 0.249 0.001 0.0022 0.0030 0.0001 0.03 0.03 — — 2.53 1.756 Inventive Example 21 0.0027 0.01 3.02 0.255 0.001 0.0024 0.0030 0.0001 0.04 — 0.003 — 2.52 1.753 Inventive Example 22 0.0024 0.02 3.04 0.250 0.001 0.0021 0.0025 0.0001 0.04 — — 0.004 2.52 1.755 Inventive Example 23 0.0061 0.01 3.02 0.251 0.001 0.0017 0.0019 0.0001 — — — — 2.91 1.720 Inventive Example 24 0.0093 0.01 2.98 0.252 0.001 0.0020 0.0020 0.0001 — — — — 3.13 1.702 Inventive Example 25 0.0029 0.02 0.55 0.252 0.001 0.0022 0.0022 0.0001 — — — — 3.32 1.745 Inventive Example 26 0.0031 0.01 5.02 0.248 0.001 0.0023 0.0018 0.0001 — — — — 2.41 1.720 Inventive Example 27 0.0024 0.02 2.99 0.064 0.001 0.0019 0.0019 0.0001 — — — — 2.72 1.736 Inventive Example 28 0.0027 0.02 2.97 1.989 0.001 0.0019 0.0021 0.0001 — — — — 2.44 1.722 Inventive Example 29 0.0027 0.09 3.00 0.256 0.001 0.0021 0.0022 0.0001 — — — — 2.65 1.737 Inventive Example 30 0.0029 0.19 3.01 0.247 0.001 0.0023 0.0023 0.0001 — — — — 2.64 1.738 Inventive Example 31 0.0033 0.01 3.01 0.251 1.95 0.0021 0.0018 0.0001 — — — — 2.42 1.688 Inventive Example 32 0.0031 0.02 3.03 0.248 0.001 0.0048 0.0017 0.0001 — — — — 3.32 1.678 Inventive Example 33 0.0032 0.02 2.98 0.255 0.001 0.0022 0.0094 0.0001 — — — — 3.22 1.682 Inventive Example

Example 2

(61) Steels No. 1-33 having a chemical composition shown in Table 1 are melted in a refining process of convertor-vacuum degassing treatment and continuously casted to form steel slabs, which are heated at 1140° C. for 1 hour and hot rolled at a finish hot rolling temperature of 900° C. to form hot rolled sheets having a sheet thickness of 3.0 mm, and wound around a coil at a temperature of 750° C. Next, the coil is pickled without being subjected to a hot band annealing, and cold rolled once to provide a cold rolled sheet having a sheet thickness of 0.5 mm, which is subjected to a finish annealing under soaking conditions of 1000° C. and 10 seconds to provide a non-oriented electrical steel sheet. The average heating rate from 500° C. to 800° C. in the finish annealing is varied within a range of 20-300° C./s.

(62) From the thus obtained steel sheet are taken out Epstein test specimens of 30 mm×280 mm to measure an iron loss W.sub.15/50 and a magnetic flux density B.sub.50 by a 25 cm Epstein apparatus, the results of which are also shown in Table 2.

(63) As seen from Table 2, non-oriented electrical steel sheets having excellent magnetic properties can be obtained by controlling a chemical composition of a raw steel material (slab) to the range defined herein or by controlling a chemical composition of a raw steel material (slab) and a heating rate in the finish annealing to the ranges defined herein even if the hot band annealing is omitted.

(64) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Magnetic Hating properties rate Iron Magnetic in finish loss flux Chemical composition (mass %) annealing W.sub.15/50 density  o C P Si Mn Al N S Ga Sn Sb Ca REM (° C./s) (W/kg) B.sub.50 (T) Remarks  1 0.0028 0.01 2.97 0.251 0.001 0.0019 0.0022 0.0001 — — — — 20 2.78 1.708 Comparative Example  2 0.0029 0.02 3.00 0.248 0.001 0.0020 0.0020 0.0001 — — — — 40 2.67 1.718 Comparative Example  3 0.0031 0.01 3.01 0.254 0.001 0.0020 0.0020 0.0001 — — — — 50 2.62 1.725 Inventive Example  4 0.0030 0.01 3.02 0.250 0.001 0.0022 0.0022 0.0001 — — — — 75 2.60 1.729 Inventive Example  5 0.0025 0.02 2.96 0.255 0.001 0.0020 0.0019 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.59 1.734 Inventive Example  6 0.0029 0.02 3.01 0.252 0.001 0.0022 0.0023 0.0001 — — — — 125 2.59 1.734 Inventive Example  7 0.0031 0.01 2.98 0.247 0.001 0.0019 0.0021 0.0001 — — — — 150 2.58 1.734 Inventive Example  8 0.0029 0.02 2.99 0.244 0.001 0.0021 0.0023 0.0001 — — — — 200 2.58 1.735 Inventive Example  9 0.0028 0.02 2.98 0.248 0.001 0.0023 0.0022 0.0001 — — — — 300 2.59 1.735 Inventive Example 10 0.0027 0.01 3.00 0.255 0.001 0.0018 0.0018 0.0004 — — — — 100 2.77 1.709 Inventive Example 11 0.0028 0.01 2.97 0.252 0.001 0.0019 0.0022 0.0007 — — — — 100 3.21 1.662 Comparative Example 12 0.0032 0.02 3.03 0.248 0.20 0.0018 0.0018 0.0001 — — — — 40 2.78 1.702 Comparative Example 13 0.0024 0.02 2.99 0.247 0.19 0.0018 0.0021 0.0001 — — — — 50 2.73 1.709 Inventive Example 14 0.0029 0.01 3.02 0.251 0.19 0.0022 0.0019 0.0001 — — — — 75 2.71 1.712 Inventive Example 15 0.0027 0.01 3.00 0.255 0.20 0.0018 0.0018 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.70 1.714 Inventive Example 16 0.0028 0.02 3.02 0.252 0.21 0.0021 0.0021 0.0001 — — — — 125 2.70 1.714 Inventive Example 17 0.0032 0.02 3.03 0.252 0.21 0.0020 0.0020 0.0001 — — — — 150 2.69 1.712 Inventive Example 18 0.0028 0.01 2.97 0.252 0.20 0.0019 0.0022 0.0001 — — — — 200 2.69 1.715 Inventive Example 19 0.0026 0.01 1.47 0.252 0.001 0.0019 0.0021 0.0001 — — — — 20 3.10 1.745 Comparative Example 20 0.0031 0.01 1.52 0.248 0.001 0.0019 0.0020 0.0001 — — — — 50 2.97 1.762 Inventive Example 21 0.0030 0.02 1.51 0.249 0.001 0.0021 0.0017 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.81 1.773 Inventive Example 22 0.0029 0.02 1.47 0.248 0.001 0.0022 0.0019 0.0001 — — — — 200 2.80 1.774 Inventive Example 23 0.0059 0.01 3.01 0.251 0.001 0.0021 0.0018 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.68 1.723 Inventive Example 24 0.0098 0.02 2.99 0.253 0.001 0.0022 0.0019 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.73 1.719 Inventive Example 25 0.0028 0.01 0.51 0.250 0.001 0.0019 0.0022 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.97 1.790 Inventive Example 26 0.0030 0.01 4.99 0.249 0.001 0.0019 0.0021 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.40 1.705 Inventive Example 27 0.0028 0.02 2.99 0.061 0.001 0.0020 0.0022 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.66 1.739 Inventive Example 28 0.0025 0.02 2.94 1.991 0.001 0.0020 0.0018 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.41 1.723 Inventive Example 29 0.0027 0.09 3.00 0.251 0.001 0.0018 0.0019 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.59 1.734 Inventive Example 30 0.0028 0.19 3.03 0.248 0.001 0.0019 0.0017 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.58 1.735 Inventive Example 31 0.0029 0.01 2.98 0.248 1.97 0.0022 0.0021 0.0001 — — — — 100 2.51 0.701 Inventive Example 32 0.0033 0.02 2.98 0.249 0.001 0.0047 0.0020 0.0001 — — — — 100 3.22 1.684 Inventive Example 33 0.0031 0.02 2.97 0.252 0.001 0.0018 0.0091 0.0001 — — — — 100 3.34 1.678 Inventive Example