METHODS TO INCREASE MILK YIELD AND YIELD OF MILK CONSTITUENTS IN LACTATING RUMINANTS

Abstract

The present invention is in the field of animal feed, feed supplements, premixes, and feed additives, more particular for ruminants, even more particular for improvement of performance, in particular lactation performance, of a ruminant animal. Provided are methods to increase milk yield, milk protein yield, milk fat yield, milk lactose yield and energy-corrected milk yield in a lactating ruminant.

Claims

1. A method for increasing milk yield in a lactating ruminant, the method comprising administering a composition comprising gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof and a controlled release agent at least in a period before and after parturition.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the one or more derivatives of gluconic acid comprises gluconate salts and gluconate esters.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the one or more gluconic acid salts are selected from calcium gluconate, sodium gluconate, quinine gluconate, ferrous gluconate, potassium gluconate, zinc gluconate, copper gluconate, cobalt gluconate, barium gluconate, lithium gluconate, magnesium gluconate and cupric gluconate, preferably is calcium gluconate and/or sodium gluconate, more preferably is calcium gluconate.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the controlled release agent is selected from the group consisting of fatty acids, animal oils, vegetable oils and mixtures thereof.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the controlled release agent is a vegetable oil.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the vegetable oil is selected from palm oil, soybean oil, rape seed oil, cottonseed oil, castor oil, and mixtures thereof. 7 The method according to claim 5, wherein the vegetable oil is palm oil.

8. The method according to claim 5, wherein the vegetable oil is partly hydrogenated, preferably fully hydrogenated.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the weight percent ratio of the gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof to the controlled release agent ranges from about 20:80 to about 65:35 percent by weight.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the ruminant is selected from the group consisting of cows, cattle, sheep, goats, bison, buffalo, moose, elks, giraffes, yaks, deer, camels, antelope, preferably cows.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the composition is administered orally.

12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the composition is administered during the dry period of the lactating ruminant.

13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the composition is administered during the lactation phase of the lactating ruminant.

14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the milk yield is energy-corrected milk yield.

15. A method for increasing milk protein yield in a lactating ruminant, the method comprising administering a composition comprising gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof and a controlled release agent at least in a period before and after parturition.

16. A method for increasing milk fat yield in a lactating ruminant, the method comprising administering a composition comprising gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof and a controlled release agent at least in a period before and after parturition.

17. A method for increasing milk lactose yield in a lactating ruminant, the method comprising administering a composition comprising gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof and a controlled release agent at least in a period before and after parturition.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0046] The present inventors surprisingly found that the release, such as post-ruminal release, of a composition comprising gluconic acid and/or one or more gluconic acid derivatives thereof (e.g. one or more derivatives thereof, such as calcium gluconate) resulted in an increase in milk yield, milk protein yield, milk fat yield, milk lactose yield and energy-corrected milk yield in lactating ruminants, when the composition was administered at the start of the transition period.

[0047] In a first aspect, the present invention relates to the use of a composition comprising a gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof and a controlled release agent for increasing milk yield, milk protein yield, milk fat yield, milk lactose yield and/or energy-corrected milk yield in a lactating ruminant. Preferably, the composition is administered at least in the transition period, e.g., the period between about 21 days prepartum and about 21 days postpartum. In an embodiment the use is non-therapeutic.

[0048] The composition may comprise one or more derivatives of gluconic acid, e.g., a gluconate salt or a gluconate ester.

[0049] In an embodiment, the composition comprises a gluconate salt, preferably selected from the group consisting of calcium gluconate, sodium gluconate, quinine gluconate, ferrous gluconate, potassium gluconate, zinc gluconate, copper gluconate, cobalt gluconate, barium gluconate, lithium gluconate, magnesium gluconate and cupric gluconate, more preferably calcium gluconate and/or sodium gluconate, more preferably calcium gluconate.

[0050] Any controlled release agent that is suitable for allowing at least partial, preferably substantial or substantially complete ruminal bypass may be used in the compositions as taught herein. Partial ruminal bypass, as used herein, may refer to ruminal bypass fractions of over 20%, 25%, or 30%, such as over 35%, 40%, or 45%, preferably as measured using the in vitro rumen simulation method taught herein. Substantial ruminal bypass, as used herein, may refer to ruminal bypass fractions of over 50%, such as over 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, or 75% or more, preferably as measured using the in vitro rumen simulation method taught herein. Substantially complete ruminal bypass as used herein refers to ruminal bypass fractions of over 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or more, preferably as measured using the in vitro method taught herein. Controlled release agents that are suitable for allowing partial, substantial, or substantially complete ruminal bypass in ruminants as well as methods to produce and use them for the purpose of partially, substantially, or completely bypassing the rumen are well known and commercially available. The skilled person knows how to prepare an effective controlled release agent that is suitable for allowing partial, substantial, or substantially complete ruminal bypass, and that is suitable for the delivery of gluconic acid and/or more or more gluconic acid derivatives (e.g. calcium gluconate) to the abomasum and lower intestine of ruminants.

[0051] In an embodiment, the controlled release agent is additionally suitable for allowing at least partial, preferably substantial, more preferably substantially complete, intestinal digestibility. Partial intestinal digestibility as used herein refers to intestinal digestibility fractions of over 20% or 25%, such as over 30%, 35%, 40%, or 45%, preferably as measured using the in vitro intestinal simulation method taught herein. Substantial intestinal digestibility as used herein refer to intestinal digestibility fraction of over 50%, such as over 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75% or more, preferably as measured using the in vitro intestinal simulation method taught herein. Substantially complete intestinal digestibility as used herein refers to intestinal digestibility fractions of over 80%, 85%, 90%, such as over 95% or more, preferably as measured using the in vitro intestinal simulation method taught herein.

[0052] Non-limiting representative examples of controlled release agents suitable for use in the composition taught herein include fatty acids (e.g. saturated or unsaturated fatty acid, essential fatty acids, short-chain fatty acids, medium-chain fatty acids, long-chain fatty acids, very-long-chain fatty acids or mixture thereof), partly or fully hydrogenated (or hardened) animal oils (beef tallow, yellow grease, sheep tallow, hog fat and others or mixture thereof), partly or fully hydrogenated (or hardened) vegetable oils (e.g. palm oil, soybean oil, rapeseed oil, cottonseed oil, castor oil, and others or mixture thereof), waxes, soaps, and a mixture thereof.

[0053] Non-limiting examples of controlled release agents suitable for use in the composition as taught herein are described, for instance, in patents U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,541,204, 3,959,493, 5,496,571, JP60-168351, JP 61-195653, JP 63-317053, patent application WO 96/08168, and others.

[0054] Other non-limiting examples of controlled release agents suitable for use in the composition taught herein include controlled release agents that are sensitive to pH, i.e., that will break down depending on the pH environment. Ruminal bypass compositions belonging to this category are chosen because they are partially, substantially or substantially completely stable or insoluble in pH environment of the rumen (pH environment ranging between 5.5 and 7.0) and partially, substantially or completely soluble in pH environment of the abomasum (pH environment ranging from 2 to 4). Representative, non-limiting examples of pH-sensitive controlled release agents suitable for use in the compositions taught herein include liposomes, membranes, hydrogels, acrylic polymers or co polymers, a polysaccharides, vinyl polymers or copolymers, amino acids, and mixtures thereof. Examples of ruminal bypasses which are at least partially, preferably substantially or substantially completely sensitive to pH environment are described for instance in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,713,245, 4,808412, 4,832,967, 4,876,097, and 5,227,166.

[0055] In an embodiment, the controlled release agent may be coated onto the gluconic acid and/or one more gluconic acid derivatives. In another embodiment, the gluconic acid and/or gluconic acid derivatives may be incorporated or encapsulated into a matrix composed of a controlled release agent as taught herein.

[0056] The controlled release agent suitable for allowing partial, substantial or substantially complete rumen-bypass may advantageously be selected from the group consisting of fatty acids, animal oils, vegetable oils and mixtures thereof.

[0057] Preferably, said controlled release agent comprises a vegetable oil, preferably selected from the group consisting of palm oil, soybean oil, rapeseed oil, cottonseed oil, and castor oil, or mixtures thereof. In a preferred embodiment, said controlled release agent comprises or consists of palm oil.

[0058] In an embodiment, the vegetable oil is at least partly hydrogenated, preferably fully hydrogenated.

[0059] The composition as taught herein may be made by any method known to a person skilled in the art. For example, the gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof may be presented in the form of a core and may be coated with a controlled release agent, or the gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof may be embedded in a matrix of a controlled release agent.

[0060] In an embodiment, the composition as taught herein is prepared by embedding the gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof in a matrix of a controlled release agent, e.g., a vegetable oil, e.g., an at least partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, e.g., a hydrogenated vegetable oil. The vegetable oil may be any vegetable oil, but is preferably selected from the group consisting of palm oil, soybean oil, rapeseed oil, cottonseed oil, and castor oil, or mixtures thereof. In a preferred embodiment, preferably said controlled release agent comprises or consists of palm oil.

[0061] Embedding a gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof in a matrix of a controlled release agent can be done by any technique suitable for making particles from a few microns to several millimetres known to a person skilled in the art. A non-limiting but highly suitable exemplary technique is spray chilling, also referred to as spray cooling, spray congealing, or prilling. Spray chilling is a lipid based system where the active ingredient (e.g., gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof) is mixed into a molten matrix (e.g., a molten matrix of the controlled release agent, such as hydrogenated vegetable oil), which mixture is subsequently fed through a nozzle, e.g., an atomizer nozzle, to produce droplets of the mixture. The droplets are allowed to solidify, e.g., by contacting them with cooled air at a temperature below the melting point of the controlled release agent resulting in the formation of particles. In an embodiment, the composition taught herein is obtainable by such method.

[0062] In an embodiment, the composition taught herein has an average particle size distribution of between about 150 and 3000 pm, such as between about 300 and 2000 pm, or between about 500 and 1500 pm, preferably between 650 and 1250 pm, more preferably between about 800 and 1000 pm. The particle size distribution can be measured by using standard sieve analysis (e.g., using a Retsch Sieve Shaker AS 200), e.g. as taught in ASTM C136. Reference herein to the average particle size is to the average particle diameter.

[0063] In an embodiment, the weight percent ratio of the gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof to the controlled release agent ranges from about 20:80 to about 65:35 percent by weight, or is at least about 40:60 percent by weight, preferably about 50:50 percent by weight of the composition taught herein.

[0064] The extent of rumen bypass of a given composition can be determined using an in vitro rumen simulation technique. An example of such an in vitro technique is in vitro incubation using rumen simulation fluid. An exemplary suitable rumen simulation fluid comprises or consists of 50 mM phosphate and 20 mM calcium chloride adjusted to pH 6.5 using NaOH. The in-vitro release of gluconic acid in a composition as taught herein can be determined as follows: 500 mg of the composition taught herein may be incubated in 150 mL rumen simulation fluid as taught herein in a shaking water bath at 39° C. for sixteen hours. A sample may be taken of the mixture, which may be centrifuged to collect supernatant for further analysis, e.g., using LC-MS. Optionally, the supernatant may be stored at -20° C. prior to analysis. In an embodiment, a composition as taught herein may be considered rumen-bypass when over 20%, such as over 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or more, of the gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof is not released during the in vitro rumen simulation method as taught herein; i.e., over 20%, such as over 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or more of the gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof remains present in the composition as taught herein, preferably as measured using the in vitro rumen simulation method taught herein.

[0065] In an embodiment, the composition as taught herein has a post-ruminal release of over 20%, such as over 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or more of the gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives, preferably as measured using an in vitro post-ruminal release simulation method as taught herein.

[0066] In vitro post-ruminal release may subsequently be simulated using an in vitro gastric phase, followed by an in vitro gut phase. To this end, the suspension remaining after the rumen simulation technique may be adjusted to pH 2 using 37% HCl, and pepsin (1 g/L), preferably from porcine gastric mucosa (e.g., Sigma P7000) is added. The mixture is preferably incubated for two more hours at 39° C. Then, the pH may be raised to 6.8 using NaOH, pancreatin and bile extract (both at 3 g/L), preferably pancreatin from porcine pancreas (e.g., Sigma P7545) and porcine bile extract (e.g., Sigma B8631), may be added, and the suspension is incubated for another five hours at 39° C. A sample may be taken of the mixture, which may be centrifuged to collect supernatant for further analysis, e.g., using LC-MS. Optionally, the supernatant may be stored at −20° C. prior to analysis.

[0067] In an embodiment, the composition as taught herein may be administered as a ruminant feed. In another embodiment, the composition as taught herein may be a constituent of a ruminant feed composition, or may be administered as a top-dress composition. The compositions as taught herein may be administered to a ruminant simultaneously with other conventional ruminant feeds and/or feed supplements (e.g. corn silage, alfalfa silage, mixed hay, and the like) or may be administered separately, i.e. before or after feeding a ruminant with conventional ruminant feeds.

[0068] In an embodiment, the composition taught herein may be administered in an amount between about 1 and 100 grams/day, preferably between about 5 and 60 grams/day, such as between 7 and 50 grams/day, between 10 and 45 grams/day, or between 12 and 40 grams/day, more preferably between about 12 and 20 grams a day. Amounts of gluconic acid and/or one or more derivatives thereof (like for example calcium gluconate) delivered post-ruminally may be between about 0.01 and 35 grams/day, preferably between about 0.1 and 20 grams/day, such as between 1 and 17 grams/day, between 2 and 15 grams/day, or between 3 and 12 grams/day, more preferably between 3 and 7 grams a day.

[0069] The ruminant may be selected from the group consisting of dairy cows, beef cattle, sheep, goats, bison, buffalo, moose, elks, giraffes, yaks, deer, camels, and antelope, and is preferably selected from dairy cows, sheep and goats. The ruminant referred to herein may be an adult ruminant.

[0070] The composition may be administered orally.

[0071] In an embodiment, the compositions as taught herein may be administered during the dry period of the lactating ruminant. In an embodiment, the compositions as taught herein may be administered during the lactation phase of the lactating ruminant. In yet another embodiment, the composition as taught herein may be administered during both the dry period and the lactation phase of the lactating ruminant.

[0072] The present invention is further illustrated, but not limited, by the following example. From the above discussion and the example, one skilled in the art can ascertain the essential characteristics of the present invention, and without departing from the teaching and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions. Thus, various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Effects of Rumen Protected Calcium Gluconate on Lactation Performance in Dairy Cows

[0073] Treatments

[0074] Treatments were a negative control (no treatment) and 0.07% DMI (16 g/d of rumen-protected calcium gluconate containing 6.25 g of active ingredient). Based on potential rumen degradability of 20%, the proposed feeding amount was predicted to provide 5 g/d of active ingredient.

[0075] Materials and Methods

[0076] Fifty-three dairy cows were placed on treatment approximately 21 days prepartum until 308 days of lactation. During the dry period in late gestation, cows were fed a commercial dry cow ration to provide an estimated net energy for lactation (NE.sub.L) 6.35 MJ/kg dry matter (DM) and 15.0% crude protein (CP) to meet 100% of energy and protein requirements, respectively. During the prepartum period, the dry cow ration was fed either as control (no supplementation) or treatment (containing 0.07% DM (16 g/day) rumen-protected calcium gluconate (RPCG)). After parturition, cows were fed a commercial lactating cow ration to provide an estimated NE.sub.L of 7.61 MJ/kg DM and 16.64% CP to meet 100% of energy and protein requirements, respectively. The lactating cow ration was fed as a control (no supplementation) or treatment (containing 0.07% DM RPCG [approximately 16 g/d of RPCG consisting of 9.75 g of controlled release agent (palm oil) and 6.25 g of calcium gluconate]). RPCG was prepared by using spray chilling technique. Using this lipid based system, calcium gluconate was added to a molten matrix of palm oil and the mixture was fed through an atomizer nozzle. The droplets solidified as they came into contact with cooled air at a temperature below the melting point of the lipid carrier resulting in RPCG particles.

[0077] Experimental Design

[0078] The experiment was a longitudinal study design consisting of one 21 day sampling period prepartum and a period of 308 days of lactation, which was split up in eleven sampling periods of 28 days postpartum. Samples were collected on the last day of each sampling period and milk was collected for the last three days of each sampling period. Dairy cows used on this experiment were kept in dry cow pens during the prepartum period and in tie stalls in the lactating dairy unit at the Trouw Nutrition Agresearch Dairy Research Facility in the postpartum period. Cows were fed a basal dry cow diet ad libitum during the prepartum period and a basal lactating cow diet ad libitum for the duration of the experiment as per current management practice.

[0079] Results

[0080] Animal Health and Performance

[0081] Body weight and body condition score were not different between treatments.

[0082] Milk and Component Production

[0083] Energy-corrected milk yield increased 2.71 kg/d in response to RPCG (Table 1), while milk fat yield increased 109 g/d and milk protein yield and lactose yield increased 100 g/d.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Lactation performance of lactating dairy cows consuming rumen-protected calcium gluconate. Yield, kg/d Control RPCG Milk 37.5 39.2 Fat 1.61 1.72 Protein 1.19 1.29 Lactose 1.78 1.88 Energy Corrected Yield, kg/d 41.3 44.0

[0084] Conclusions

[0085] This experiment was designed to determine efficacy of rumen-protected calcium gluconate on milk production parameters in dairy cattle. These results demonstrate a positive response to dietary provision of 16 g/d of rumen-protected product in terms of both milk yield and milk component yield.