Optical waveguide interferometer
10996400 · 2021-05-04
Assignee
Inventors
- Keisuke Kojima (Weston, MA)
- Bingnan Wang (Belmont, MA, US)
- Toshiaki Koike-Akino (Saugus, MA)
- Koichi Akiyama (Tokyo, JP)
- Eiji YAGYU (Tokyo, JP)
- Satoshi Nishikawa (Tokyo, JP)
- Kosuke SHINOHARA (Tokyo, JP)
Cpc classification
G02B6/12011
PHYSICS
G02B6/29344
PHYSICS
G02B6/1228
PHYSICS
G02B6/12016
PHYSICS
International classification
G02B6/13
PHYSICS
Abstract
An optical waveguide interferometer that includes a first optical section, a second optical section, and a set of optical waveguides configured to connect the first and second optical sections, such that light propagating between the first optical section and the second optical section passes through each optical waveguide in the set, wherein the set of optical waveguides includes a first optical waveguide having a first length and a first width and a second optical waveguide having a second length and a second width, wherein the second length is greater than the first length, and the second width is greater than the first width.
Claims
1. An optical waveguide interferometer, comprising: a first optical section; a second optical section; a set of optical waveguides connecting the first optical section and the second optical section, such that light propagating between the first optical section and the second optical section passes through each optical waveguide in the set, wherein each of the optical waveguides consists of a core layer and a cladding layer, wherein the set of optical waveguides includes a first optical waveguide having a first length and a first width and a second optical waveguide having a second length and a second width, wherein the second length is greater than the first length, and the second width is greater than the first width, wherein a product of a first derivative of a first effective refractive index of the first waveguide with respect to the first width and the first length is substantially equal to another product of a second derivative of a second effective refractive index of the second waveguide with respect to the width and the second length, such that a relative phase difference caused between the first and second waveguides is compensated, wherein at least one of the optical waveguides includes a curved portion, wherein each waveguide width is consistent throughout an entire waveguide.
2. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, wherein the first optical section is a branching section including at least one branch-input port for accepting the light into the branching section and at least two branch-output ports for outputting the light from the branching section, wherein the two branch-output ports includes a first branch-output port connected to the first optical waveguide and a second branch-output port connected to the second optical waveguide, and wherein the second optical section is an optical coupling section including at least two coupling-input ports for accepting the light into the coupling section and at least one coupling-output port for outputting the light from the coupling section, wherein the two coupling-input ports includes a first coupling-input port connected to the first optical waveguide and a second coupling-input port connected to the second optical waveguide.
3. The optical waveguide interferometer of claimed in claim 1 wherein an effective refractive index of the first optical waveguide is greater than an effective refractive index of the second optical waveguide.
4. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, wherein when the first length is L1, the second length is L2, a first derivative of the first effective refractive index with respect to the first width is Δn1, and a first derivative of the second effective refractive index with respect to the second width is Δn2, and the first width and the second width are determined such that a difference between the product of L1 and Δn1 and the product of L2 and Δn2 is less than 10%.
5. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, wherein the first width and the second width are determined such that L1.Math.Δn1=αn2, and 0.9≤α≤1.1.
6. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, wherein the optical interferometer is an asymmetric Mach Zehnder interferometer.
7. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, wherein the optical interferometer is an arrayed waveguide grating.
8. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, wherein the optical interferometer consists of two multimode interference devices and more than two interconnecting waveguides.
9. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, the set of optical waveguides includes more than two waveguides, wherein all waveguides in the set have different lengths and different widths selected such that each optical waveguide longer than another waveguide is wider than the other.
10. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, wherein each optical waveguide has a tapered input and a tapered output portion of approximately the same maximal width.
11. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 10, wherein the input and output portions of the first and second optical sections are configured such that the tapered input and outputs of the waveguides are connected with the tapered input and output portions of the set of optical waveguides.
12. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first and second optical sections has at least one unconnected waveguide.
13. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first and second optical sections has at least one unguided section at each output portion.
14. The optical waveguide interferometer of claimed 13, wherein the segment includes a narrower section having a length being longer than at least 1 μm.
15. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, wherein each of the optical waveguides includes at least one segment being narrower than another segment.
16. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, further comprising: a substrate attached to a bottom of the first optical section, the second optical section and the set of waveguides, wherein the substrate includes one or combination of an indium phosphide substrate, a silicon substrate, and a glass substrate.
17. The optical waveguide interferometer of claim 1, wherein the second length is determined by steps of: determining a core thickness of the set of optical waveguides for a predetermined wavelength; determining the first length and a first width according to a predetermined system design; determining an additional length based on a predetermined wavelength separation and an effective refractive index of the first waveguide; and determining the second length by adding the first length and the additional length.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
(18) Various embodiments of the present invention are described hereafter with reference to the figures. It would be noted that the figures are not drawn to scale elements of similar structures or functions are represented by like reference numerals throughout the figures. It should be also noted that the figures are only intended to facilitate the description of specific embodiments of the invention. They are not intended as an exhaustive description of the invention or as a limitation on the scope of the invention. In addition, an aspect described in conjunction with a particular embodiment of the invention is not necessarily limited to that embodiment and can be practiced in any other embodiments of the invention.
(19)
(20) The optical waveguide interferometer 100 also includes a set of waveguides connecting the first optical section 110 and the second optical section 120, such that light propagating between the first optical section 110 and the second optical section (120) passes through each optical waveguide in the set. In this example, the set of the waveguides includes two waveguides a first optical waveguide 130 and a second optical waveguide 140; however, other embodiments include different number of waveguides. The first optical waveguide 130 has a first length and a first width. The second optical waveguide 140 has a second length and a second width selected such that the second length is greater than the first length, and the second width is greater than the first width.
(21) In some embodiments, optical waveguides 150 and 160 are connected to input portions of the first optical section 110 for accepting the light into the first optical section 110. One side of the waveguides 130 and 140 are connected to output portions of the branching section 110 and another side of the waveguides 130 and 140 are connected to input portions of the second optical section 120, respectively. Output portions of the second optical section 120 are connected to optical output waveguides 170 and 180. The optical output waveguides 170 and 180 may be connected to optical fibers or optical waveguides. Optical signals with different wavelengths λ.sub.1 and λ.sub.2, propagating the optical input waveguides 150 and 160, respectively, are input to the input sections of the branching section 110 via the optical input waveguides 150 and 160. After passing the branching section 110, and the waveguides 130 and 140 and the second optical section 120, the optical signals are output from the output portions of the second optical section 120 to the optical output waveguides 170 and 180. In the present embodiment, although a circuit configuration of 2×2 optical input/output waveguides and two interconnecting waveguides configuration is shown as an example, the number of input/output waveguides and the number of the waveguides may be changed according to the optical circuit design. The input portion and the output portion described above may be referred to an input port and an output port, respectively.
(22) Some embodiments of the invention are based on recognition and appreciation of the fact that an effective refractive index of a waveguide changes with a waveguide width. This indicates that when the waveguide width fluctuates by Δw as a result of manufacturing process fluctuation, the effective refractive index fluctuates by Δn.sub.eff as well. In other words, the effective refractive index of the waveguide is as a function of an average of waveguide width fluctuations over the waveguide length.
(23)
(24) When an effective refractive index deviates from a predesigned value as a result of manufacturing fluctuations, the phase of a light-wave (optical signal) propagating the waveguide shifts according to the refractive index deviation at the output side of the waveguide. In this case, when two optical signals propagating two waveguides, a relative phase difference between the two optical signals is caused at output sides of the waveguides. The relative phase difference Δφ between the two optical signals is written as follows.
Δφ=(L.sub.1.Math.Δn.sub.eff-1−L.sub.2.Math.Δn.sub.eff-2).Math.2π/λ, (1)
where L.sub.1 is a length of a first waveguide, L.sub.2 is a length of a second waveguide, Δn.sub.eff-1 is a fluctuation value of an effective refractive index deviated from a predesigned effective refractive index n.sub.eff-1 of the first waveguide, and Δn.sub.eff-2 is a fluctuation value of an effective refractive index deviated from a predesigned effective refractive index n.sub.eff-2 of the second waveguide. By taking the relative phase difference Δφ being zero in equation (1), a relative phase difference compensation condition is written as
Δn.sub.eff-1/Δn.sub.eff-2=L.sub.2/L.sub.1. (2)
(25) In other words, when the waveguides satisfy the relation of equation (2), the relative phase difference caused between the first and second waveguides can be compensated to zero. To satisfy equation (2), when L.sub.2 is greater than L.sub.1 (L.sub.2>L.sub.1), Δn.sub.eff-1 may be greater than Δn.sub.eff-2. For example, the effective refractive index fluctuations Δn.sub.eff-1 and Δn.sub.eff-2 with a 0.45 μm core thickness for a waveguide width fluctuation Δw are schematically illustrated at different width regions in
(26) In
(27) As an example in
(28) For example, for a core thickness of 0.45 μm, L.sub.1 and L.sub.2 may be 315.3 μm and 365.3 μm, and W.sub.1 and W.sub.2 may be 1.40 μm and 1.48 μm, respectively.
(29) In another embodiment, the widths W.sub.1 and W.sub.2 may be chosen to be 1.40 μm and 1.44 μm, respectively. This combination provides effective reduction of the sensitivity of effective refractive index fluctuations due to the waveguide width fluctuations.
(30) Some embodiments are based on recognition that such a reduction of the sensitivity of effective refractive index fluctuations can be archived when a product of the first length L.sub.1 and a deviation Δn.sub.eff-1 of an effective refractive index of the first waveguide is substantially equal to a product of the second length L.sub.2 and a deviation Δn.sub.eff-2 of an effective refractive index of the second waveguide.
(31) To that end, some embodiments select the first and the second widths accordingly, using, e.g., the plot of
(32) For example, one embodiment uses the following relationship for designing the optical waveguides.
L.sub.1.Math.Δn.sub.eff-1=α.Math.L.sub.2.Math.Δn.sub.eff-2, where 0.9≤α≤1.1 (3)
(33)
(34) In order to determine a second length L.sub.2 (=L.sub.1+ΔL), a waveguide length difference ΔL is determined according to the following relation.
ΔL=λ.sup.2/(2.Math.n.sub.g.Math.Δλ), where n.sub.g=n.sub.eff−λ(dn/dλ). (4)
(35) For example, when Δλ is set to be 4.48 nm for the signal wavelength at λ=1.3 μm, n.sub.g is determined according to the predetermined system to be 3.664 by assuming that n.sub.eff=3.243 and dn/dλ=−0.324. By using n.sub.g(=3.664) into equation (4), ΔL is obtained to be 51.5 μm. Accordingly, the second length L2 can be determined by calculating L2=L1+51.5 μm in the present example.
(36) After L2 is determined, the width W2 of the second waveguide can be determined by using equation (3) by refereeing
(37) As an example, the first width W1 and second W2 are indicated in
(38) After the first length L1 and first width W1 for a predetermined core thickness and a predetermined wavelength are determined, the second length L2 and second width W2 are obtained. The designing steps are illustrated in
(39)
(40) In different embodiments, each of the waveguides 130 and 140 is formed of an indium phosphide (InP) substrate 10 (substrate 10), an indium gallium arsenide phosphide (InGaAsP) layer 20 (core layer 20), an InP cladding layer 30 (cladding layer 30), an InP cap layer 40 (cap layer 40). The InGaAsP layer 20 may be used as a core layer of each of the waveguides 130 and 140. The core layer 20 may be in thickness approximately from 0.3 μm to 0.7 μm. The cladding layer 30 may be in thickness approximately from 0.7 to 1.2 μm. The cap layer 40 may be in thickness approximately from 0.4 μm to 0.6 μm. The InP substrate 10 includes a bottom cladding layer 50 having a thickness d. The thickness d of the bottom cladding layer 50 may be approximately identical to the thickness of the cladding layer 30. For example, when the cladding layer 30 is 0.9 μm in thickness, the bottom cladding layer 50 may be approximately 0.9 μm.
(41) Alternately, the core layer may be an indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) layer with approximately from 0.3 μm to 0.7 μm.
(42) For an example, the InP substrate 10 may be mounted on a glass substrate 60, as shown in
(43)
(44)
(45) For example, parasitic reflections take place at the optical coupling section 220 when some amount of optical waves (optical signals) from the waveguides 230 and 240 are not input into the output waveguide 270 and reflected at the optical coupling section 220. The unconnected waveguides 280 and 290 are configured so as to effectively release the optical waves of parasitic reflections through the ends of the unconnected waveguides 280 and 290, respectively. Accordingly, the unconnected waveguides 280 and 290 are terminated such that there will be minimal reflection of the optical waves. Typical width of the input side of the unconnected waveguides 280 and 290 may be greater than 1.5 μm, and the lengths of the unconnected waveguides 280 and 290 may be between 30-70 μm.
(46) In this embodiment, a width of the waveguide 240 may be arranged to be greater than that of the waveguide 230, and a length of the waveguide 240 may be arranged to be greater than that of the waveguide 230. Each width of the waveguides 230 and 240 may be defined by taking an average width calculated over the waveguide length. Input ends (or signal input sides) of the waveguides 230 and 240 are connected to the output portions of another optical section, such as an optical branching section (not shown).
(47) For more options, in order to effectively guide the optical waves from the waveguides 230 and 240 into the output waveguide 270, the output waveguide 270 may include a tapered-shape having approximately a predetermined width w.sub.0 at the output portion of the optical coupling section 220. The tapered-shape is configured to effective receive the optical wave from the waveguides 230 and 240 by making the input portion of the output waveguide 270 wider. It is preferable that the output ends of the waveguides 230 and 240 and the input end of the output waveguide 270 have approximately the same width w.sub.0 at the input and output portions of the optical coupling section 220 to improve signal input/output characteristics, e.g. optical loss reduction, as indicated in
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51) For example, the branching section 310 may be connected to input waveguides 350 and 360 having tapered-shapes with approximately a width w.sub.0 at the input portions of the branching section 310. The waveguide 330 includes a tapered-shape portion having approximately the width w.sub.0 at the input end connected to the output portion of the branching section 310. The waveguides 340 has approximately the width w.sub.0. Accordingly, the branching section 310 is connected to the output portions of the input waveguides 350 and 360, and is connected to the input portions of the waveguides 330 and 340, in which each of the output portions of the input waveguides 350 and 360 and the waveguides 330 and 340 have approximately the same width w.sub.0 at the connected portion. See
(52)
(53) A multiplayer grown indium phosphide (InP) substrate is used according to the design of the waveguide layer structure in step 710. The multilayer grown substrate may include a capping layer 40, a first indium phosphide (InP) layer 30 (upper cladding layer 30), an indium-gallium-arsenide-phosphide (InGaAsP) layer 20 (core layer 20) and a second InP layer 50 (lower cladding layer 50) being part of an InP substrate 10. The InGaAsP layer (core layer) 20 may be 0.3-0.7 μm, more preferably 0.45 μm. The capping layer 40 may be excluded from the waveguide structure according to the system design. The upper cladding layers 30 and the lower cladding layer 50 may be in thickness approximately from 0.7 to 1.2 μm.
(54) In steps 720 through 740 of
(55) In step 750, an etching process is performed to form a waveguide structure of the optical waveguide interferometer 100 having the waveguides 130 and 140 as shown in
(56) A thickness d of the lower cladding layer 50 is indicated in
(57) Alternatively, the bottom of InP substrate may be thinned by a polishing process and bounded with a silicon substrate, as shown in
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61) Although several preferred embodiments have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art that many changes and modifications may be made thereunto without the departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined by the following claims and their equivalents.