AUDIO LOUDSPEAKER AND RELATED METHOD
20210099792 · 2021-04-01
Inventors
Cpc classification
H04R7/20
ELECTRICITY
H04R1/025
ELECTRICITY
H04R1/26
ELECTRICITY
International classification
H04R1/28
ELECTRICITY
H04R1/02
ELECTRICITY
H04R1/26
ELECTRICITY
H04R7/20
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
An audio speaker includes an enclosure having a coupling chamber and a loading chamber, at least m radiating drivers, and at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) in communication with the coupling chamber, wherein m is at least two and each radiating driver operates in common acoustic phase. The coupling chamber acts to couple the at least m radiating drivers and the at least m−1 loading driver(s), for example, and the loading chamber acts to load the loading driver(s). The at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) may have a higher sensitivity than the at least m radiating drivers and the at least m radiating drivers may be arranged within the enclosure to minimize a volume of the coupling chamber. In other embodiments, the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) may be other types of inducers (e.g., an undriven loading driver(s), a drone cone, a port, or combinations thereof).
Claims
1. An audio speaker, comprising: an enclosure including a sealed coupling chamber; at least m radiating drivers; and at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) in communication with the coupling chamber, wherein m is at least two and each radiating driver operates in common acoustic phase.
2. The audio speaker of claim 1, wherein the coupling chamber acts to couple a non-radiating face of the at least m radiating drivers and a face of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s).
3. The audio speaker of claim 1, wherein a loading chamber acts to load a face of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s).
4. The audio speaker of claim 1, wherein all radiating drivers radiate into a listening space.
5. The audio speaker of claim 1, wherein at least one of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) communicates with a loading chamber.
6. The audio speaker of claim 1, wherein a volume of a loading chamber is substantially the same as a volume of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s).
7. The audio speaker of claim 1, wherein at least one of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) is positioned at least partially within a loading chamber.
8. The audio speaker of claim 1, wherein at least one of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) is larger in size than the at least m radiating drivers.
9. The audio speaker of claim 3, wherein the loading chamber includes a port and wherein the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) is positioned at least partially within the loading chamber.
10. The audio speaker of claim 3, wherein the loading chamber includes a port and wherein the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) communicates with the coupling chamber.
11. The audio speaker of claim 3, wherein the loading chamber includes a drone cone and wherein the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) is positioned at least partially within the loading chamber.
12. The audio speaker of claim 3, wherein the loading chamber includes a drone cone and wherein the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) communicates with the coupling chamber.
13. The audio speaker of claim 1, wherein the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) having a higher sensitivity than each of the at least m radiating drivers.
14. The audio speaker of claim 1, wherein the at least m radiating drivers are arranged within the enclosure to minimize a volume of the coupling chamber.
15. An audio speaker, comprising: an enclosure including a sealed coupling chamber and a loading chamber; at least m radiating drivers; and at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) in communication with the coupling chamber, wherein m is at least two, each radiating driver operates in common acoustic phase, and the loading chamber acts to load a face of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s).
16. The audio speaker of claim 15, wherein the coupling chamber acts to couple a non-radiating face of the at least m radiating drivers and a face of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s).
17. The audio speaker of claim 15, wherein the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) having a higher sensitivity than each of the at least m radiating drivers.
18. The audio speaker of claim 15, wherein at least one of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) is positioned at least partially within the loading chamber.
19. The audio speaker of claim 15, wherein at least one of the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) is larger in size than the at least m radiating drivers.
20. The audio speaker of claim 15, wherein the loading chamber includes a port and wherein the at least one and no more than m−1 loading driver(s) is positioned at least partially within the loading chamber.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES
[0063] The accompanying drawing figures incorporated herein and forming a part of the specification, illustrate several aspects of the audio speakers and together with the description serve to explain certain principles thereof. In the drawing figures:
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067]
[0068]
[0069]
[0070]
[0071]
[0072]
[0073]
[0074]
[0075]
[0076]
[0077]
[0078]
[0079]
[0080] Reference will now be made in detail to the present embodiments of the audio speakers, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawing figures, wherein like numerals are used to represent like elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0081] Reference is now made to
[0082] As shown, the enclosure 36 includes a loading portion 38 that defines a loading chamber 40 and a coupling portion 42 that defines a coupling chamber 44. The size and shape of the loading and coupling portions 38 and 42 and the defined loading and coupling chambers 40 and 44 may vary in size and/or shape based on design preference, desired output parameters, etc. In the described embodiment, the four radiating drivers 32 are supported by the enclosure 36 generally within the coupling chamber 44 such that the drivers radiate away from the enclosure into a listening space such as a room, stadium, venue, etc. In other words, the radiating drivers 32 create sound waves into the listening space. Similarly, the loading driver 34 is supported by the enclosure generally within the coupling chamber 44 but the driver communicates with the loading chamber 40 and the coupling chamber 44. In this arrangement, the radiating drivers 32 are loaded by the loading driver 34, and the loading driver is loaded by the loading chamber 40.
[0083] Turning to the embodiment shown in
[0084] As shown in
[0085] Of course, a loading driver may be positioned at nearly any location within an enclosure so long as the loading driver is able to load the at least two radiating drivers. In one other embodiment shown in
[0086] The four key components of the above-described embodiments shown in
[0087] In the described embodiments, the radiating drivers were chosen for their characteristics to produce sound at a desired level and quality over a desired frequency range. The loading drivers were selected to compliment the radiating drivers so that the loading chamber could be minimized and so that the radiating drivers would couple with the loading drivers in the coupling chamber. For illustration purposes, consider the radiating drivers in Table 2 and add a single loading driver to create Table 4 shown below. This configuration with these values was used in a test prototype which unexpectedly produced very satisfactory sound quality over a wide range of frequencies.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Sd Fs Mms Qts Area of Resonant Air Mass Resonant Prototype Drivers Cone Frequency Equivalent Peak (4) 10″ Radiating 358 cm 37.7 Hz 53 g 0.26 (1) 15″ Loading 881 cm 47 Hz 106 g 0.47
[0088] In order to use equations 1 and 2, set forth above, to determine a required loading chamber volume, Vb, guidance can be taken from the isobaric one-to-one methodology by combining the Mms for all 5 individual drivers to determine a composite Mms. This seems a reasonable place to start and free-air testing of the speaker system with added mass to the cones validates the method of adding the Mms of all drivers even when the loading driver is not identical to the radiating driver. Free-air testing of a single driver is well understood and involves stimulating the driver electrically without a loading chamber (hence free-air) and measuring the current response. A similar approach was adopted for free-air testing the described driver arrays whereby there was a coupling chamber between the radiating drivers and the loading driver(s), but there was not a loading chamber.
[0089] A second parameter to obtain for the described embodiment's illustrative driver array is the system Qts which is, fortunately, provided by the free-air test.
[0090] The third parameter to obtain for the described embodiment's illustrative driver array is the system Sd. This parameter is more troubling to obtain for the system since the total Sd for the radiating drivers is 4*358 cm=1,432 cm, which is considerably larger than the loading driver Sd of 881 cm. The one-to-one isobaric literature does not provide direction on what is the effective Sd of the system when the loading driver(s) is of different quantity and size relative to the radiating driver(s). Since the loading chamber interfaces directly with the loading driver(s) and not the radiating drivers, a reasonable place to start is to assume that the system Sd is the same as the loading driver Sd.
[0091] With the above assumptions the system parameters are estimated and shown in Table 5 below.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Sd Fs Mms Qts Area of Resonant Air Mass Resonant Prototype Drivers Cone Frequency Equivalent Peak (4) 10″ Radiating 358 cm 37.7 Hz 53 g 0.26 (1) 15″ Loading 881 cm 47 Hz 106 g 0.47 System 881 cm 41 Hz 318 g 0.36
[0092] With this information, the anticipated loading chamber size, Vb, for the system can be calculated from equations 1 and 2, assuming that the equations are valid for the system with the loading driver(s) not identical to the radiating drivers:
Vas=k*Sd.sup.2/(Mms*Fs.sup.2)=36*881.sup.2/(318*41.sup.2)=52.3 liters (2)
Vb=Vas/((Qtc/Qts).sup.2−1)=52.3/((0.651.36).sup.2−1)=23.1 liters (1)
[0093] While a loading chamber size, Vb, of 23.1 liters in the test prototype represents a significant reduction and would be very satisfactory, actual testing of the prototype audio loudspeaker system revealed that a Vb of 5 liters is needed to yield an Qtc of 0.65. Five liters is essentially the air volume inside a concave shape of the loading driver cone, as the actual back wall of the loading chamber was flush with the driver after allowing for cone travel. In other words, it was impractical to make Vb smaller and the Vb volume did not take up any additional space outside the driver's cone. The actual Vb was an unanticipated ⅕ the volume of the anticipated Vb with the assumed parameter values from Table 5. As noted above, the volume of the loading driver refers herein to an air volume inside a concave shape of the loading driver cone/diaphragm.
[0094] It is interesting to note that the commonly practiced equations used to calculate loading chamber volume appear inadequate for a speaker system when the loading driver is not identical to the radiating driver. Most importantly, the result is a pleasantly surprising one—whereby the actual required loading chamber volume is very small. This result makes for a compelling case to reduce the loading chamber for an array of radiating drivers by adding a single loading driver. It should also be noted that multiple loading drivers of a smaller diameter could be deployed instead of the larger single. For example, two 12″ drivers could have been used as the loading drivers in the described embodiments. But, one 15″ driver will usually be less expensive than two 12″ drivers, so a single loading driver will usually be chosen. The embodiments described herein were used as the subwoofer in several beta test live performances and the consistent feedback from listeners was that the bass sounded awesome. Interestingly, most listeners did not recognize the described embodiment as being the subwoofer since it was so small it did not fit into their paradigm of what a bass loudspeaker looked like.
[0095] A summary of the loading chamber volume for the various cases considered for implementing a four 10″ radiating driver array with a Qtc of 0.65 for bass frequencies is shown in Table 6.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Radiating Loading Vb Configuration Drivers Qtc Drivers FIG. (liters) Conventional 4 × 10″ 0.65 None 1 40.8 Isobaric 4 × 10″ 0.65 4 × 10″ 3 20.6 One Embodiment 4 × 10″ 0.65 1 × 15″ 5 5.0
[0096] A topic of relevance to the discussion of loading drivers not being identical to radiating drivers includes the conditions under which they couple. In this instance, coupling means that the drivers communicate with each other in such a way as to obtain a desired operating regime. The loudspeaker industry's conventional thought on the requirements for an isobaric pair of drivers coupling each other is that each driver in the pair is identical and are electrically manipulated from the amplifier so that they move forward and backward in unison, or are in common acoustic operation. Such a condition produces the assumed constant pressure in the coupling chamber and therefore facilitates coupling. Without coupling, the drivers would be acting independent of each other, or at least not having the desired effect on each other. The embodiments disclosed herein do not assume that the pressure is constant in the coupling chamber as does isobaric. Further, the embodiments disclosed herein assert that the loading driver can be different from the radiating drivers in size; however, for optimum results, coupling must occur between the loading driver(s) and the radiating drivers in order for the space reducing properties desired to be maximized while maintaining good sound quality.
[0097] Toward the objective of having a guideline for designing a coupled system where the loading driver(s) is different in size and quantity from the radiating drivers, the following is offered. Assuming the loading driver(s) is electrically manipulated at the same magnitude and in appropriate phase relative to the radiating drivers, then the loading driver(s) should have higher sensitivity than the radiating drivers. The parameter sensitivity is a measure of SPL produced for a given electrical input with the units of dB. So, a driver with a certain Sd and a higher sensitivity will displace more air volume than a driver of the same Sd but with lower sensitivity, assuming both are manipulated by the same electrical input.
[0098] The inventor has seen good results over a range of loading driver sensitivity relative to that of the radiating drivers in actual testing. Sizes available for both radiating and loading drivers are in steps such as 2″, 3″, 4″, 6″, 8″, 10″, 12″ 15″, 18″, and 21″ diameters. Therefore, a desired ratio of Sb radiating to Sb loading is not always possible to obtain precisely because a size needed to create the desired ratio may not exist. In general, an acceptable design (good sound quality with minimum size) may be reached with fewer design-build-test iterations by following this process assuming multiple radiating drivers with fewer loading drivers than radiating drivers: (1) determine a type and quantity of radiating drivers to accomplish sound reproduction objectives; (2) select or utilize a loading driver Sd equal to or larger than any single radiating driver; (3) select or utilize a loading driver(s) Sd (combined) equal to or smaller than all radiating drivers combined; (4) select or utilize a loading driver having an equal to or higher sensitivity than a radiating driver; (5) minimize the volume of the coupling chamber by geometric arrangement of the drivers; and (6) minimize the volume of the loading chamber. In using these steps, a first prototype should be configured with an aggressively small loading chamber that can be increased in size if necessary on subsequent prototype(s).
[0099] The parameters for steps (1) through (3) above are shown in Table 7.
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Radiating Drivers Loading Drivers Qty × Dia Sd each Sd total Sensitivity Qty × Dia Sd each Sd Sensitivity 4 × 10″ 358 1432 91.6 1 × 15″ 881 881 96.0
[0100] It should be acknowledged that the mathematical modeling of speaker systems often is many years behind the practical implementation of an improvement. This will likely prove to be true for the disclosed invention in regards to both a) selecting loading and radiating drivers that will couple, and b) defining the mathematical equations that provide the required loading chamber volume for the selected drivers.
[0101] Many prototypes have been built and tested wherein the acoustic speaker includes m radiating drivers and at least one but less than m−1 loading driver(s) with satisfactory results. Examples are included in the following list, but the invention is in no way limited to these additional examples: (1) two radiating drivers with one loading driver; (2) three radiating drivers with one loading driver; (4) four radiating drivers with one loading driver, where the radiating drivers are arranged in one or two columns; (5) eight radiating drivers with one loading driver, where the radiating drivers are arranged in a single or multiple columns; (6) eight radiating drivers with two loading drivers, where the radiating drivers are arranged in a single or multiple columns; (7) bass frequency range only; and (8) full frequency range. For each example configuration listed above, many were successfully implemented with the loading driver being identical in size with the radiating drivers. However, superior results were generally obtained when the loading driver was larger in diameter than any one radiating driver and had a higher sensitivity.
[0102] Which configuration is chosen by the designer depends on certain preferences such as industrial design and considerations like minimizing the volumes of the coupling and loading chambers. The disclosed techniques provide for a very small loading chamber, and the coupling chamber is naturally more effective the smaller it is. So, the loudspeaker designer may choose how to configure the drivers so that overall loudspeaker size is minimized by minimizing distances between drivers in the direction(s) which are important in the application.
[0103] The foregoing has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments to the precise form disclosed. Obvious modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings. For example, the described embodiments utilize one or more loading drivers but at least one less than a number of radiating drivers. In other embodiments, however, other sound pressure creation inducers, may be utilized. For example, the at least two radiating drivers may be combined with one or more sonic inducers such as an electroacoustic transducer (e.g., a loading driver) and a resonant exciter (e.g., an unpowered or undriven loading driver, a port, or a drone cone) as further described below.
[0104] As shown in
[0105] Even more, each of the embodiments shown in
[0106] In even more embodiments, shown in
[0107] As shown in
[0108] In another embodiment shown in
[0109] As shown in
[0110] In another embodiment shown in
[0111] All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally and equitably entitled.