Spiro compound and use thereof
10981900 · 2021-04-20
Assignee
Inventors
- Peng Zhang (Shanghai, CN)
- Lingyun Wu (Shanghai, CN)
- Jun YIN (Shanghai, CN)
- Jian Li (Shanghai, CN)
- Shuhui Chen (Shanghai, CN)
Cpc classification
C07D413/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07D403/04
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07D409/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07D403/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07D413/04
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07D413/12
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07D409/04
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07D417/04
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C07D413/12
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07D409/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07D417/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07D413/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
The present disclosure relates to a series of tricyclic compounds and the use thereof as receptor agonists of sphingosine-1-phosphate subtype 1 (S1P1), and in particular relates to compounds as shown in formula (I) or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. ##STR00001##
Claims
1. A compound represented by formula (I), an optical isomer thereof or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, ##STR00209## wherein each R.sub.1 is independently selected from the group consisting of H, F, Cl, Br, I, OH, NH.sub.2, and CN, or is independently selected from the group consisting of C.sub.1-6 alkyl and C.sub.1-6 heteroalkyl, each of which is optionally substituted by 1, 2 or 3 R; R.sub.2 is H, or is selected from the group consisting of C.sub.1-6 alkyl, C.sub.1-6 heteroalkyl and C.sub.3-6 cycloalkyl, each of which is optionally substituted by 1, 2 or 3 R; T is selected from the group consisting of N and CH; moiety ##STR00210## is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00211## moiety ##STR00212## is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00213## ring B is selected from the group consisting of phenyl and 5- to 6-membered heteroaryl; m is 1 or 2; n is 0, 1, 2 or 3; R is selected from the group consisting of F, Cl, Br, I, OH, NH.sub.2, CN, and COOH, or is selected from the group consisting of C.sub.1-6 alkyl, C.sub.1-6 alkoxy, N,N-di(C.sub.1-6 alkyl)amino, and C.sub.3-6 cycloalkyl; the heteroatom or the heteroatom group of the C.sub.1-6 heteroalkyl and the 5- to 6-membered heteroaryl is each independently selected from the group consisting of N, O, S, NH, —NHC(═O)—, —S(═O)— and —S(═O).sub.2—; and the number of the heteroatom or the heteroatom group is 1, 2, 3 or 4.
2. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 1, wherein R is selected from the group consisting of F, Cl, Br, I, OH, NH.sub.2, CN, COOH, Me, Et, N(CH.sub.3).sub.2, ##STR00214##
3. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 1, wherein each R.sub.1 is independently selected from the group consisting of H, F, Cl, Br, I, OH, NH.sub.2, and CN, or is independently selected from the group consisting of C.sub.1-3 alkyl, C.sub.1-3 alkoxy, C.sub.1-3 alkylamino, and C.sub.1-3 alkyl-S(═O).sub.2—, each of which is optionally substituted by 1, 2 or 3 R.
4. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 3, wherein each R.sub.1 is independently selected from the group consisting of H, F, Cl, Br, I, OH, NH.sub.2, and CN, or is independently selected from the group consisting of Me, Et, ##STR00215## each of which is optionally substituted by 1, 2 or 3 R.
5. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 4, wherein each R.sub.1 is independently selected from the group consisting of H, F, Cl, Br, I, OH, NH.sub.2, CN, Me, Et, ##STR00216##
6. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 1, wherein R.sub.2 is selected from the group consisting of C.sub.1-4 alkyl, C.sub.1-3 alkyl-O—C.sub.1-3 alkyl-, C.sub.1-3 alkyl-S(═O).sub.2—C.sub.1-3 alkyl-, C.sub.1-3 alkyl-NH—C.sub.1-3 alkyl-, C.sub.1-3 alkyl-NHC(═O)—C.sub.1-3 alkyl- and C.sub.3-6 cycloalkyl, each of which is optionally substituted by 1, 2 or 3 R.
7. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 6, wherein R.sub.2 is selected from the group consisting of Me, Et, ##STR00217## each of which is optionally substituted by 1, 2 or 3 R.
8. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 7, wherein R.sub.2 is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00218##
9. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 1, wherein the moiety ring ##STR00219## is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00220##
10. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 1, wherein ring B is selected from the group consisting of 1,2,4-oxadiazolyl, 1,2,4-thiadiazolyl, pyrazinyl, thiazolyl, oxazolyl and pyrimidinyl.
11. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 1, wherein ring B is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00221##
12. The compound, the optical isomer thereof, or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 1, wherein the moiety ##STR00222## is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00223##
13. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 12, wherein the moiety ##STR00224## is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00225## ##STR00226##
14. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 1, wherein the moiety ##STR00227## is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00228##
15. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 1, wherein the moiety ##STR00229## is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00230##
16. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 1, which is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00231## wherein n, R.sub.1 and R.sub.2 are as defined in claim 1.
17. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 16, which is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00232## ##STR00233## ##STR00234## wherein R.sub.1 and R.sub.2 are as defined in claim 16.
18. A compound represented by the following formula, an optical isomer thereof or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, which is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00235## ##STR00236## ##STR00237## ##STR00238## ##STR00239## ##STR00240## ##STR00241## ##STR00242## ##STR00243## ##STR00244## ##STR00245## ##STR00246##
19. The compound, the optical isomer thereof or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 18, which is selected from the group consisting of ##STR00247## ##STR00248## ##STR00249## ##STR00250## ##STR00251## ##STR00252## ##STR00253## ##STR00254## ##STR00255## ##STR00256## ##STR00257## ##STR00258## ##STR00259## ##STR00260## ##STR00261## ##STR00262## ##STR00263## ##STR00264## ##STR00265## ##STR00266## ##STR00267## ##STR00268## ##STR00269## ##STR00270## ##STR00271##
20. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a compound, an optical isomer thereof or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof according to claim 1 as an active ingredient, and pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
21. A method of treating a disease associated with S1P1 receptor in a subject, comprising administering to the subject claim 1.
22. A method of treating a disease associated with S1P1 receptor in a subject, comprising administering to the subject a composition according to claim 20.
Description
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(1) The present disclosure is illustrated below by the examples, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto. The present disclosure has been described in detail herein, including the embodiments disclosed herein, and various modifications and changes made to the embodiments disclosed herein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, are obvious to a person skilled in the art.
Example 1
(2) ##STR00148## ##STR00149##
(3) Step 1
(4) Compound 1-1 (40.6 g, 192 mmol) and tosylmethyl isocyanide were dissolved in ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (1.30 L) and ethanol (69.0 mL). Potassium tert-butoxide (23.7 g, 212 mmol) was added to the reaction solution at 0° C. The reaction solution was stirred at 16° C. for 15 hours. Water (1 L) was added to the reaction solution, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (800 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=50:1) to afford compound 1-2.
(5) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.45 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (t, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (t, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.22-3.07 (m, 1H), 3.05-2.95 (m, 1H), 2.65-2.55 (m, 1H), 2.47-2.33 (m, 1H).
(6) Step 2
(7) Compound 1-2 (16.8 g, 75.7 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (160 mL), lithium diisopropylamide (2 M, 49.2 mL) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at −78° C., and the reaction mixture was stirred at that temperature for 1 hour. Methyl bromoacetate (16.2 g, 106 mmol, 10.0 mL) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 16° C. for 16 hours. Water (150 mL) was added to the reaction solution, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (200 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (500 mL×1), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=50:1 to 40:1) to afford compound 1-3.
(8) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.40 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.13-7.06 (m, 1H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.06-2.88 (m, 3H), 2.75-2.63 (m, 2H), 2.45-2.34 (m, 1H).
(9) Step 3
(10) Compound 1-3 (14.2 g, 48.3 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (400 mL) and water (4.00 mL). Cobalt dichloride (25.1 g, 193 mmol) and sodium borohydride (3.65 g, 96.6 mmol) were added portionwise to the reaction solution at −20° C. The reaction solution was stirred at −20° C. to 0° C. for 4 hours. After the reaction solution was filtered, water (400 mL) was added to the filtrate. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (400 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (600 mL×1), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate (20 g), and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford compound 1-4. The crude product was used in the next step directly without purification.
(11) MS-ESI calculated for [M+].sup.+: 298 and 300, found: 298 and 300.
(12) Step 4
(13) Compound 1-4 (12.0 g, 40.1 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (120 mL). Sodium hydroxide (3.21 g, 80.3 mmol) was added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 16° C. for 15 hours. Water (200 mL) was added to the reaction solution, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (200 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (500 mL×1), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=3:1 to 0:1) to afford compound 1-5.
(14) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, DMSO-d.sub.6) δ 7.74 (s, 1H), 7.40 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.18-7.13 (m, 1H), 3.31-3.29 (m, 2H), 2.89-2.80 (m, 2H), 2.34-1.94 (m, 4H). MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 266 and 268, found: 266 and 268.
(15) Step 5
(16) Compound 1-5 (8.33 g, 27.2 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (85.0 mL). Sodium hydride (2.17 g, 54.4 mmol, 60% purity) was added portionwise to the mixture at 0° C., and the reaction was stirred at that temperature for 1 hour. Compound 1-6 (13.0 g, 54.4 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 16° C. for 16 hours. Water (200 mL) was added to the reaction solution, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (200 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (400 mL×1), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate (20 g), and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=10:1) to afford compound 1-7.
(17) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.32 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (t, J=5.2 Hz, 2H), 3.60-3.53 (m, 2H), 3.41 (t, J=5.2 Hz, 2H), 2.91 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.66-2.47 (m, 2H), 2.24-2.08 (m, 2H), 0.82 (s, 9H), 0.00 (s, 6H). MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 424 and 426, found: 424 and 426.
(18) Step 6
(19) Compound 1-7 (5.00 g, 10.6 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (130 mL). Zinc cyanide (3.75 g, 31.9 mmol), tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium (1.95 g, 2.13 mmol) and 2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl (2.03 g, 4.26 mmol) were added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 90° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and filtered. The filter cake was washed with dichloromethane (100 mL×3) and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=8:1 to 2:1) to afford compound 1-8.
(20) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.50 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J=7.6, 1H), 7.33-7.28 (m, 1H), 3.79 (t, J=5.2 Hz, 2H), 3.64 (d, J=0.8 Hz, 2H), 3.53-3.41 (m, 2H), 3.13 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.72-2.58 (m, 2H), 2.37-2.20 (m, 2H), 0.86 (s, 9H), 0.00 (s, 6H).
(21) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 371, found: 371.
(22) Step 7
(23) Compound 1-8 (2.70 g, 7.29 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (70.0 mL). Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (1.52 g, 21.9 mmol) and triethylamine (2.95 g, 29.2 mmol) were added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 60° C. for 15 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was concentrated under reduced pressure, and water (100 ml) was then added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (150 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (300 mL×1), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford compound 1-9.
(24) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.34 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.24-7.17 (m, 2H), 4.81 (s, 2H), 3.74 (t, J=5.2 Hz, 2H), 3.65-3.52 (m, 2H), 3.41 (t, J=5.2 Hz, 2H), 3.06 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.70-2.46 (m, 2H), 2.15-2.05 (m, 2H), 0.82 (s, 9H), 0.00 (s, 6H).
(25) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 404, found: 404.
(26) Step 8
(27) Compound 1-10 (38.8 mg, 0.248 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (3 mL). To the reaction solution were added 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (67.0 mg, 0.496 mmol) and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (71.3 mg, 0.372 mmol). The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 1 hour. Compound 1-9 (100 mg, 0.248 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 1 hour. The reaction solution was then heated to 85° C., and stirred at 85° C. for 15 hours. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature and isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 1-11 (i.e., Example 1).
(28) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.22 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.07 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.53 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.47-7.39 (m, 1H), 3.76-3.72 (m, 2H), 3.71 (s, 2H), 3.57-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.38 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.81-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.42-2.19 (m, 2H).
(29) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 410, found: 410.
Example 2
(30) ##STR00150##
(31) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 8 of Example 1. The crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 2-2 (i.e., Example 2).
(32) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.22 (s, 1H), 8.16 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.73-7.68 (m, 1H), 7.63 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.56-7.51 (m, 1H), 7.44 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.77-3.72 (m, 2H), 3.71 (s, 2H), 3.56-3.45 (m, 2H), 3.37 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.81-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.42-2.20 (m, 2H).
(33) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 410, found: 410.
Example 3
(34) ##STR00151##
(35) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 8 of Example 1. The crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 3-2 (i.e., Example 3).
(36) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.18 (dd, J=1.6, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (dd, J=1.6, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.72-7.62 (m, 2H), 7.60-7.52 (m, 2H), 7.44 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.7-3.72 (m, 4H), 3.55-3.45 (m, 2H), 3.40 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.90-2.60 (m, 2H), 2.42-2.21 (m, 2H).
(37) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 410, found: 410.
Example 4
(38) ##STR00152##
(39) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 8 of Example 1. The crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 4-2 (i.e., Example 4).
(40) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.18 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.07 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.49-7.40 (m, 1H), 7.17 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.79-3.74 (m, 2H), 3.73 (s, 2H), 3.55-3.46 (m, 2H), 3.38 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.83-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.43-2.22 (m, 2H).
(41) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 406, found: 406.
Example 5
(42) ##STR00153##
(43) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 8 of Example 1. The crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 5-2 (i.e., Example 5).
(44) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.09 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.59-7.52 (m, 2H), 7.45 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.76-3.73 (m, 4H), 3.57-3.46 (m, 2H), 3.39 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.85-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.45-2.22 (m, 2H).
(45) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 406, found: 406.
Example 6
(46) ##STR00154##
(47) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 8 of Example 1. The crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 6-2 (i.e., Example 6).
(48) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.11 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.05 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.01 (s, 3H), 3.74-3.71 (m, 4H), 3.55-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.37 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.82-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.43-2.20 (m, 2H).
(49) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 406, found: 406.
Example 7
(50) ##STR00155##
(51) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 8 of Example 1. The crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 7-2 (i.e., Example 7).
(52) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.38 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.09 (d, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.74-3.71 (m, 4H), 3.53-3.46 (m, 2H), 3.38-3.34 (m, 2H), 2.81-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.31-2.21 (m, 2H).
(53) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 401, found: 401.
Example 8
(54) ##STR00156##
(55) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 8 of Example 1. The crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 8-2 (i.e., Example 8).
(56) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.55 (s, 1H), 8.52-8.47 (m, 1H), 8.11-8.02 (m, 2H), 7.82 (t, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (t, J=5.6 Hz, 2H), 3.71 (s, 2H), 3.54-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.37 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.81-2.60 (m, 2H), 2.46-2.20 (m, 2H).
(57) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 401, found: 401.
Example 9
(58) ##STR00157##
(59) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 8 of Example 1. The crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 9-2 (i.e., Example 9).
(60) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.36-8.28 (m, 2H), 8.11-8.04 (m, 1H), 7.53 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (t, J=55.2 Hz, 1H), 4.97-4.90 (m, 1H) 3.75 (t, J=1.0 Hz, 2H), 3.72 (s, 2H), 3.56-3.43 (m, 2H), 3.38 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.83-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.42-2.18 (m, 2H), 1.42 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(61) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 484, found: 484.
Example 10
(62) ##STR00158##
(63) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 8 of Example 1. The crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 10-2 (i.e., Example 10).
(64) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.12-8.03 (m, 2H), 7.95 (s, 1H), 7.52 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.03-6.65 (t, J=74.4 Hz, 1H), 4.86-4.81 (m, 1H), 3.74-3.71 (m, 4H), 3.56-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.36 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.82-2.59 (m, 2H), 2.42-2.19 (m, 2H), 1.42 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(65) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 500, found: 500.
Example 11
(66) ##STR00159##
(67) Step 1
(68) Compound 11-2 (53.2 mg, 0.248 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (4.00 mL). HOBt (67.0 mg, 0.496 mmol) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (71.3 mg, 0.372 mmol) were added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 15° C. for 1 hour. Compound 11-1 (100 mg, 0.248 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution. The mixture was stirred at 15° C. for 1 hour, and finally heated to 85° C. and stirred for 12 hours. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 11-3 (i.e., Example 11).
(69) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 8.24 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.12-8.04 (m, 2H), 7.40 (d, J=4.4 Hz, 2H), 7.06 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.76-4.68 (m, 1H), 3.85-3.81 (m, 2H), 3.67-3.49 (m, 4H), 3.42-3.34 (m, 2H), 2.82-2.75 (m, 1H), 2.72-2.64 (m, 1H), 2.72-2.64 (m, 1H), 2.38-2.23 (m, 2H), 1.45 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(70) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 468, found: 468.
Example 12
(71) ##STR00160##
(72) Step 1
(73) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 1 of Example 11. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 12-3 (i.e., Example 12).
(74) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.26 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.05 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.52-7.48 (m, 2H), 7.43-7.37 (m, 2H), 4.86-4.82 (m, 1H), 3.74-3.70 (m, 4H), 3.56-3.43 (m, 2H), 3.39 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.75-2.64 (m, 2H), 2.40-2.31 (m, 1H), 2.28-2.19 (m, 1H), 1.39 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(75) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 459, found: 459.
Example 13
(76) ##STR00161##
(77) Step 1
(78) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 1 of Example 11. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 13-3 (i.e., Example 13).
(79) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.12 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.03 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 4.78-4.72 (m, 1H), 3.77-3.69 (m, 4H), 3.56-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.35 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.75-2.64 (m, 2H), 2.39-2.31 (m, 1H), 2.28-2.19 (m, 1H), 1.37 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(80) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 434, found: 434.
Example 14
(81) ##STR00162##
(82) Step 1
(83) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 1 of Example 11. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 14-3 (i.e., Example 14).
(84) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.36-8.31 (m, 2H), 8.06 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 3H), 7.42 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.77-3.69 (m, 4H), 3.56-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.37 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.7-2.65 (m, 2H), 2.41-2.32 (m, 1H), 2.29-2.20 (m, 1H).
(85) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 460, found: 460.
Example 15
(86) ##STR00163##
(87) Step 1
(88) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 1 of Example 11. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 15-3 (i.e., Example 15).
(89) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.27 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.09-8.02 (m, 1H), 7.56 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.45-7.35 (m, 3H), 7.03 (t, J=73.2 Hz, 1H), 3.80-3.67 (m, 4H), 3.58-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.37 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.71 (q, J=1.0 Hz, 2H), 2.41-2.32 (m, 1H), 2.30-2.19 (m, 1H).
(90) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 442, found: 442.
Example 16
(91) ##STR00164##
(92) Step 1
(93) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 1 of Example 11. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 16-3 (i.e., Example 16).
(94) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.11 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.47-7.40 (m, 3H), 3.74-3.71 (m, 4H), 3.56-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.37 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.76-2.65 (m, 2H), 2.47 (s, 3H), 2.41-2.33 (m, 1H), 2.30-2.21 (m, 1H).
(95) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 390, found: 390.
Example 17
(96) ##STR00165##
(97) Step 1
(98) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 1 of Example 11. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 17-3 (i.e., Example 17).
(99) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.14 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.54-7.47 (m, 3H), 7.43 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.78-3.69 (m, 4H), 3.56-3.43 (m, 2H), 3.37 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.09-2.99 (m, 1H), 2.76-2.65 (m, 2H), 2.41-2.32 (m, 1H), 2.30-2.20 (m, 1H), 1.32 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 6H).
(100) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 418, found: 418.
Example 18
(101) ##STR00166##
(102) Step 1
(103) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 1 of Example 11. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 18-3 (i.e., Example 18).
(104) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 8.34 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.15 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.45-7.40 (m, 2H), 3.85 (s, 2H), 3.67-3.61 (m, 2H), 3.58-3.49 (m, 2H), 3.48-3.40 (m, 2H), 2.78-2.64 (m, 2H), 2.40-2.24 (m, 2H).
(105) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 401, found: 401.
Example 19
(106) ##STR00167##
(107) Step 1
(108) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 1 of Example 11. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 19-3 (i.e., Example 19).
(109) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.14 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.04 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 3.94 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.80-3.67 (m, 4H), 3.57-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.36-3.33 (m, 2H), 2.7-2.64 (m, 2H), 2.40-2.31 (m, 1H), 2.29-2.19 (m, 1H), 1.34-1.28 (m, 1H), 0.69-0.61 (m, 2H), 0.44-0.36 (m, 2H).
(110) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 446, found: 446.
Example 20
(111) ##STR00168##
(112) Step 1
(113) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 1 of Example 11. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 20-3 (i.e., Example 20).
(114) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.80 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.34 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.49-4.33 (m, 1H), 3.74-3.70 (m, 2H), 3.70 (s, 2H), 3.55-3.43 (m, 2H), 3.37-3.33 (m, 2H), 2.75-2.64 (m, 2H), 2.40-2.30 (m, 1H), 2.27-2.17 (m, 1H), 1.30 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 6H).
(115) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 512 and 514, found: 512 and 514.
Example 21
(116) ##STR00169##
(117) Step 1
(118) By referring to the Step 8 of Example 1, compound 21-2 (i.e., Example 21) was obtained.
(119) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.48-8.36 (m, 2H), 8.06-8.04 (m, 1H), 7.52 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.45-7.38 (m, 2H), 4.94-4.92 (m, 1H), 3.79-3.68 (m, 4H), 3.56-3.43 (m, 2H), 3.37-3.33 (m, 2H), 2.79-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.45-2.16 (m, 2H), 1.45 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(120) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 459, found: 459.
(121) Step 2
(122) Chiral resolution of compound 21-2 afforded compound 21-2 isomer 1 and compound 21-2 isomer 2
(123) SFC isolation method:
(124) Chromatography column: Chiralpak AD-3 50 mm*4.6 mm I.D., 3 μm;
(125) Mobile phase: A: carbon dioxide; B: 40% ethanol (containing 0.05% diethylamine);
(126) Flow rate: 4 mL/min;
(127) Column temperature: 40° C.
(128) Compound 21-2 Isomer 1, retention time: 1.173 minutes. .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.42-8.28 (m, 2H), 7.99 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.54-7.33 (m, 3H), 4.93-4.91 (m, 1H), 3.82-3.60 (m, 4H), 3.56-3.40 (m, 2H), 3.37-3.31 (m, 2H), 2.81-2.57 (m, 2H), 2.41-2.16 (m, 2H), 1.45 (d, J=5.6 Hz, 6H).
(129) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 459, found: 459.
(130) Compound 21-2 isomer 2, retention time: 1.460 minutes. .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.42-8.38 (m, 2H), 8.06-8.02 (m, 1H), 7.55-7.36 (m, 3H), 5.01-4.91 (m, 1H), 3.78-3.68 (m, 4H), 3.56-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.34 (s, 2H), 2.79-2.59 (m, 2H), 2.41-2.19 (m, 2H), 1.46 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(131) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 459, found: 459.
Example 22
(132) ##STR00170##
(133) Step 1
(134) Compound 22-1 (200 mg, 0.732 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (5.00 mL). Lithium hydroxide monohydrate (61.5 mg, 1.46 mmol) and water (1.00 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 10° C. for 16 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated. The residue was added in water (3 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (5 mL×1). The organic phase was discarded. The aqueous phase was adjusted to pH 5-6 with hydrochloric acid (1 mol/L), and extracted with dichloromethane (5 mL×2). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated to afford compound 22-2.
(135) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 8.31 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (dd, J=2.0, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.81-4.61 (m, 1H), 1.44 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(136) Step 2
(137) Compound 22-2 (70.0 mg, 0.270 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (2.00 mL), and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (73.0 mg, 0.540 mmol) and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (77.7 mg, 0.405 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at 15° C. for 1 hour. Compound 22-3 (109 mg, 0.270 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred at 15° C. for 1 hour. Hydrochloride/ethyl acetate (1.00 mL, 4 mol/L) was added and the mixture was stirred at 15° C. for 1 hour. Triethylamine was added to adjust the pH to 10 and the mixture was stirred at 85° C. for 12 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated, and the residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 22-4 (i.e., Example 22).
(138) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.40 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (dd, J=2.4, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (dd, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.95-4.92 (m, 1H), 3.76 (t, J=5.6 Hz, 2H), 3.73 (s, 2H), 3.53-3.48 (m, 2H), 3.42-3.38 (m, 2H), 2.83-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.44-2.35 (m, 1H), 2.31-2.23 (m, 1H), 1.44 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(139) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 512 and 514, found: 512 and 514.
Example 23
(140) ##STR00171##
(141) Step 1
(142) Compound 23-1 (6.00 g, 26.0 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (100 mL). Compound 23-2 (3.83 g, 31.2 mmol) and potassium carbonate (10.8 g, 77.9 mmol) were added at 10° C. The mixture was stirred at this temperature for 16 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated. The residue was added into dichloromethane (100 mL) and stirred for 1 hour. The mixture was filtered. The filtrate was concentrated to afford compound 23-3.
(143) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 8.23 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (dd, J=2.0, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.75-4.61 (m, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 1.42 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(144) Step 2
(145) Compound 23-3 (2.00 g, 7.32 mmol) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (20.0 mL). Compound 23-4 (2.24 g, 22.0 mmol), cuprous iodide (697 mg, 3.66 mmol), L-proline (843 mg, 7.32 mmol) and sodium hydroxide (293 mg, 7.32 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at 100° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was poured into water (100 mL), and extracted with EtOAc (100 mL×1). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate (5 g) and filtered. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether: ethyl acetate=3:1 to 1:1) to afford compound 23-5.
(146) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 8.66 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.25 (dd, J=2.0, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.94-4.78 (m, 1H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.23 (s, 3H), 1.49 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(147) Step 3
(148) Compound 23-5 (130 mg, 0.477 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (5.00 mL). Lithium hydroxide monohydrate (40.1 mg, 0.955 mmol) and water (1.00 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 15° C. for 2 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated. The residue was added into water (3 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (5 mL×1). The organic phase was discarded. The aqueous phase was adjusted to pH 5 to 6 with hydrochloric acid (1 mol/L), and extracted again with dichloromethane (5 mL×2). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated to afford compound 23-6.
(149) Step 4
(150) Compound 23-6 (50.0 mg, 0.194 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (2.00 mL). 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (52.3 mg, 0.387 mmol) and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (55.7 mg, 0.290 mmol) were added, and the mixture was stirred at 15° C. for 1 hour. Compound 23-7 (78.1 mg, 0.194 mmol) was then added and the mixture was stirred at 15° C. for 1 hour. The mixture was then heated to 80° C. and stirred for 16 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated, and the residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 23-8 (i.e., Example 23).
(151) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.73 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.50 (dd, J=2.4, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.59-7.51 (m, 2H), 7.46 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.10-5.01 (m, 1H), 3.79-3.72 (m, 4H), 3.55-3.48 (m, 2H), 3.40 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.34 (s, 3H), 2.85-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.45-2.22 (m, 2H), 1.52 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(152) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 512, found: 512.
Example 24
(153) ##STR00172##
(154) Step 1
(155) Compound 24-1 (2.00 g, 7.52 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (75.00 mL). Zinc cyanide (2.65 g, 22.6 mmol), tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium (1.38 g, 1.50 mmol) and 2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl (1.43 g, 3.01 mmol) were added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 90° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=1:1 to dichloromethane:methanol=6:1) to afford compound 24-2.
(156) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 7.62 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (t, J=1.0 Hz, 1H), 3.58-3.46 (m, 2H), 3.12 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.68-2.47 (m, 2H), 2.43-2.21 (m, 2H).
(157) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 213, found: 213.
(158) Step 2
(159) Compound 24-2 (1.20 g, 5.65 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (30.0 mL). Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (1.18 g, 17.0 mmol) and triethylamine (2.29 g, 22.6 mmol, 3.13 mL) were added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 60° C. for 15 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was concentrated under reduced pressure. Water (100 mL) was then added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (150 mL×3) and filtered to afford a part of the product. The filtrate was concentrated to afford a crude product. Compound 24-3 was afforded. The crude product was used directly in the next reaction.
(160) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 246, found: 246.
(161) Step 3
(162) Compound 24-4 (637 mg, 3.06 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (5.00 mL). To the reaction solution were added 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (826 mg, 6.12 mmol) and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (899 mg, 4.69 mmol). The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 1 hour. Compound 24-3 (500.00 mg, 2.04 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 1 hour. The reaction solution was then heated to 85° C., and stirred at 85° C. for 15 hours. Water (20 mL) was added to the reaction solution. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (30 mL×1), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate (5 g), filtered and concentrated. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=1:1 to dichloromethane:methanol=10:1) to afford compound 24-5.
(163) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H]+415, found: 415.
(164) Step 4
(165) Compound 24-5 (70.0 mg, 0.122 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (1.00 mL). Sodium hydride (9.77 mg, 0.244 mmol, 60% purity) was added at 0° C. The reaction was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour. Compound 24-6 (33.9 mg, 0.244 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 16° C. for 3 hours. The reaction solution was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 24-7 (i.e., Example 24).
(166) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.42-8.29 (m, 2H), 8.02 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.52-7.45 (m, 1H), 7.43-7.36 (m, 2H), 4.98-4.89 (m, 1H), 3.67 (s, 2H), 3.63-3.47 (m, 4H), 3.37 (s, 3H), 3.35-3.32 (m, 2H), 2.77-2.60 (m, 2H), 2.36-2.14 (m, 2H), 1.46 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(167) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 473, found: 473.
Example 25
(168) ##STR00173##
(169) The reaction procedure was similar to that of Step 4 of Example 24, and the crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 25-3 (i.e., Example 25).
(170) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.47-8.39 (m, 2H), 8.07 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.57-7.40 (m, 3H), 5.00-4.93 (m, 1H), 3.95-3.82 (m, 2H), 3.70 (s, 2H), 3.47 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.37 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.08 (s, 3H), 2.85-2.56 (m, 2H), 2.46-2.16 (m, 2H), 1.47 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(171) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 521, found: 521.
Example 26
(172) ##STR00174##
(173) The reaction procedure was similar to that of Step 4 of Example 24, and the crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 26-3 (i.e., Example 26).
(174) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.47-8.37 (m, 2H), 8.06 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.50-7.39 (m, 2H), 4.98-4.92 (m, 1H), 4.38-4.17 (m, 2H), 3.74-3.62 (m, 2H), 3.37 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.08 (s, 3H), 2.98 (s, 3H), 2.88-2.63 (m, 2H), 2.52-2.20 (m, 2H), 1.46 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(175) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 500, found: 500.
Example 27
(176) ##STR00175##
(177) Compound 27-1 (50.0 mg, 0.0876 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (1.00 mL). Sodium hydride (7.01 mg, 0.175 mmol, 60% purity) was added at 0° C., and the mixture was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour. Compound 27-2 (26.6 mg, 0.175 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 16° C. for 3 hours. Water (3 mL) was added to the reaction solution, and the pH of the reaction solution was adjusted to 6 with hydrochloric acid (2 mol/L). The reaction solution was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 27-3 (i.e., Example 27).
(178) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.41-8.32 (m, 2H), 8.03 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53-7.47 (m, 1H), 7.45-7.38 (m, 2H), 4.97-4.92 (m, 1H), 3.75-3.67 (m, 2H), 3.65 (s, 2H), 3.34 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.18-3.10 (m, 2H), 2.85-2.77 (m, 7H), 2.73-2.57 (m, 1H), 2.41-2.18 (m, 2H), 1.45 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(179) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 486, found: 486.
Example 28
(180) ##STR00176##
(181) Step 1
(182) Compound 28-1 (70.0 mg, 0.122 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (1.00 mL). Sodium hydride (9.77 mg, 0.244 mmol, 60% purity) was added at 0° C., and the reaction was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour. Methyl bromoacetate (18.7 mg, 0.122 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 16° C. for 16 hours. Water (10 mL) was added to the reaction solution. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (10 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with water (20 mL×1), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate (2 g) and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford a crude product. The crude product was isolated by thin layer chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=1:1) to afford compound 28-2.
(183) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 487, found: 487.
(184) Step 2
(185) Compound 28-2 (30.0 mg, 0.0617 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (3 mL) and water (1 mL). Lithium hydroxide monohydrate (5.17 mg, 0.123 mmol) was added at 16° C. The reaction solution was stirred at this temperature for 16 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford a crude product. The crude product was dissolved in methanol (3 mL) and adjusted to pH 6 with 2 mol/L hydrochloric acid. The reaction solution was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 28-3 (i.e., Example 28).
(186) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.46-8.40 (m, 2H), 8.06 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.48-7.39 (m, 2H), 4.97-4.93 (m, 1H), 4.15-4.00 (m, 2H), 3.77-3.64 (m, 2H), 3.39-3.34 (m, 2H), 2.85-2.62 (m, 2H), 2.48-2.20 (m, 2H), 1.47 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(187) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 473, found: 473.
Example 29
(188) ##STR00177##
(189) Step 1
(190) Compound 29-1 (70.0 mg, 0.122 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (1.00 mL). Sodium hydride (9.77 mg, 0.244 mmol, 60% purity) was added at 0° C., and the reaction was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour. Ethyl 5-bromopentanoate (25.5 mg, 0.122 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 16° C. for 4 hours. Water (10 mL) was added to the reaction solution. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (10 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with water (20 mL×1), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate (2 g) and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford a crude product. The crude product was isolated by thin layer chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=1:1) to afford compound 29-2.
(191) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 543, found: 543.
(192) Step 2
(193) The reaction procedure was similar to that of the Step 2 of Example 28, and the crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 29-3 (i.e., Example 29).
(194) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 8.52-8.22 (m, 2H), 8.11-8.02 (m, 1H), 7.45-7.33 (m, 2H), 7.13 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (s, 1H), 3.90-3.20 (m, 10H), 2.90-2.56 (m, 2H), 2.54-2.18 (m, 4H), 1.48 (d, J=3.6 Hz, 6H).
(195) MS-ESI calculated for [M+h].sup.+: 515, found: 515.
Example 30
(196) ##STR00178## ##STR00179##
(197) Step 1
(198) The compound 30-1 (2.50 g, 11.2 mmol) was dissolved in Hydrochloride/methanol (50 mL, 4 M), and the reaction solution was stirred at 65° C. under nitrogen for 20 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated. The residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (100 mL) and the pH was adjusted to 8 with a saturated solution of sodium bicarbonate. The organic phase was washed with saturated brine (30 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by column chromatography (5:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.5) to afford compound 30-2.
(199) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.38 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.23-4.10 (m, 1H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 3.19-3.08 (m, 1H), 3.01-2.88 (m, 1H), 2.54-2.29 (m, 2H).
(200) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 255 and 257, found: 255 and 257.
(201) Step 2
(202) Compound 30-2 (2.30 g, 9.02 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (30 mL). Lithium diisopropylamide (2 M, 5.86 mL) was slowly added dropwise at −78° C. under nitrogen. The reaction solution was stirred at −78° C. for 1 hour, and 2-bromoacetonitrile (1.62 g, 13.5 mmol) was then added. The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 12 hours. Water (5 mL) was added to the reaction solution, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (50 mL×2). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (20 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by column chromatography (10:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.4) to afford compound 30-3.
(203) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.47 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.16-7.10 (m, 1H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.23-3.01 (m, 3H), 2.91-2.80 (m, 2H), 2.29-2.23 (m, 1H).
(204) Step 3
(205) By referring to the Step 3 of Example 1, compound 30-4 was obtained.
(206) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 298 and 300, found: 298 and 300.
(207) Step 4
(208) By referring to Step 4 of Example 1, compound 30-5 was obtained.
(209) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.42-7.34 (m, 1H), 7.13-7.04 (m, 2H), 6.33 (s, 1H), 3.58-3.40 (m, 2H), 3.25-3.10 (m, 1H), 3.06-2.91 (m, 1H), 2.59-2.54 (m, 1H), 2.40-2.27 (m, 2H), 2.11-2.07 (m, 1H).
(210) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 266 and 268, found: 266 and 268.
(211) Step 5
(212) In the same manner as in Step 5 of Example 1, compound 30-6 was obtained.
(213) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.38-7.34 (m, 1H), 7.07-7.03 (m, 2H), 3.87-3.79 (m, 2H), 3.70-3.68 (m, 1H), 3.63-3.50 (m, 2H), 3.46-3.35 (m, 1H), 3.23-3.10 (m, 1H), 2.98-2.94 (m, 1H), 2.62-2.55 (m, 1H), 2.22 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.06-2.00 (m, 1H), 0.93 (s, 9H), 0.09 (s, 6H).
(214) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 424 and 426, found: 424 and 426.
(215) Step 6
(216) By referring to the Step 6 of Example 1, compound 30-7 was obtained.
(217) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.49 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.29-7.25 (m, 1H), 3.86-3.79 (m, 2H), 3.70-3.68 (m, 1H), 3.62-3.52 (m, 2H), 3.47-3.27 (m, 2H), 3.17-3.15 (m, 1H), 2.63-2.61 (m, 1H), 2.30-2.20 (m, 2H), 2.14-2.08 (m, 1H), 0.92 (s, 9H), 0.09 (d, J=1.2 Hz, 6H).
(218) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 371, found: 371.
(219) Step 7
(220) By referring to the Step 7 of Example 1, compound 30-8 was obtained as a crude product.
(221) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 404, found: 404.
(222) Step 8
(223) By referring to the Step 8 of Example 1, compound 30-9 (i.e., Example 30) was obtained.
(224) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.46-8.27 (m, 2H), 8.05-7.95 (m, 1H), 7.43-7.33 (m, 3H), 4.97-4.90 (m, 1H), 3.83-3.69 (m, 3H), 3.66-3.43 (m, 4H), 3.38-3.32 (m, 1H), 2.56-2.50 (m, 1H), 2.39-2.27 (m, 2H), 2.19-2.15 (m, 1H), 1.45 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(225) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 459, found: 459.
Example 31
(226) ##STR00180## ##STR00181## ##STR00182##
(227) Step 1
(228) Compound 31-1 (6.40 g, 25.0 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (80 mL). Lithium diisopropylamide (2 M, 15.0 mL) was added dropwise to the reaction solution at −78° C., and the mixture was stirred for 1 hour at −78° C. under nitrogen. 4-bromo-1-butene (5.08 g, 37.6 mmol) was then added and the mixture was stirred at 25° C. for 11 hours. Water (40 mL) was added to the reaction solution, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (100 mL×2). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (50 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (10:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.6) to afford compound 31-2.
(229) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.38 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.12-7.05 (m, 1H), 5.84-5.76 (m, 1H), 5.06-4.93 (m, 2H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.13-2.89 (m, 2H), 2.79-2.72 (m, 1H), 2.32-2.21 (m, 1H), 2.10-1.96 (m, 3H), 1.82-1.76 (m, 1H).
(230) Step 2
(231) Compound 31-2 (7.20 g, 23.2 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (100 mL), and a solution of lithium hydroxide (2.93 g, 69.8 mmol) in water (30 mL) was added. The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 12 hours. To the reaction solution was added 1 M aqueous HCl solution to pH 5. The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (200 mL×2). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (60 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford compound 31-3.
(232) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 7.38-7.33 (m, 2H), 7.15-7.08 (m, 1H), 5.85-5.77 (m, 1H), 5.05-4.92 (m, 2H), 3.10-2.88 (m, 2H), 2.74-2.68 (m, 1H), 2.31-2.20 (m, 1H), 2.10-1.96 (m, 3H), 1.80-1.68 (m, 1H).
(233) Step 3
(234) Compound 31-3 (6.30 g, 21.3 mmol) was dissolved in tert-butanol (100 mL). Diphenylphosphoryl azide (11.7 g, 42.6 mmol) and triethylamine (6.48 g, 64.0 mmol) were added. The reaction solution was stirred at 90° C. for 12 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was cooled to 25° C., and water (40 mL) was added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (200 mL×2). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (80 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (10:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.7) to afford compound 31-4.
(235) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.39 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.23-7.15 (m, 1H), 7.12-7.05 (m, 1H), 5.84-5.69 (m, 1H), 5.05-4.85 (m, 3H), 3.12-2.96 (m, 1H), 2.88-2.82 (m, 1H), 2.58-2.43 (m, 1H), 2.39-2.20 (m, 1H), 2.14-1.80 (m, 4H), 1.53-1.08 (m, 9H).
(236) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 366, 368, found: 366, 368.
(237) Step 4
(238) Compound 31-4 (1.00 g, 2.73 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (12 mL) and water (4 mL). Osmium tetroxide (69.4 mg, 0.273 mmol) and sodium periodate (1.75 g, 8.19 mmol) were added at 0° C. The reaction solution was stirred at 30° C. for 4 hours under nitrogen. Water (30 mL) was added to the reaction solution. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (30 mL×2). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated sodium sulfite solution (20 mL×2) and then saturated brine (20 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford compound 31-5.
(239) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 368 and 370, found: 368 and 370.
(240) Step 5
(241) Compound 31-5 (860 mg, 2.34 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (10 mL). Water (2 mL), sulfamic acid (318 mg, 3.28 mmol) and sodium chlorite (275 mg, 3.04 mmol) were added at 0° C. The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 12 hours under nitrogen. Ethyl acetate (60 mL) was added to the reaction solution. The mixture was washed with water (20 mL×2) and then saturated brine (20 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (3:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.2) to afford compound 31-6.
(242) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.44-7.42 (m, 1H), 7.18-7.08 (m, 2H), 3.16-3.05 (m, 1H), 2.98-2.91 (m, 1H), 2.72-2.53 (m, 3H), 2.34-2.31 (m, 1H), 2.23-2.17 (m, 1H), 2.07-1.98 (m, 1H), 1.15 (s, 9H).
(243) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 366, 368, found: 366, 368.
(244) Step 6
(245) Compound 31-6 (188 mg, 0.513 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (5 mL). Trifluoroacetic acid (2 mL) was added at 0° C., and the reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 2 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (40 mL), washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate (20 mL×2) and then saturated brine (20 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford compound 31-7.
(246) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.44 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.25-7.21 (m, 1H), 7.18-7.12 (m, 1H), 5.89 (s, 1H), 3.05-2.96 (m, 1H), 2.93-2.83 (m, 1H), 2.58-2.50 (m, 2H), 2.44-2.28 (m, 2H), 2.20-2.10 (m, 2H).
(247) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 266, 268, found: 266, 268.
(248) Step 7
(249) The compound 31-7 (130 mg, 0.488 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (3 mL). Sodium hydride (39.0 mg, 0.976 mmol, purity 60%) was added at 0° C. The reaction solution was stirred at 0° C. for 1 hour. Compound 31-8 (233 mg, 0.976 mmol) was added, and the reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. under nitrogen for 12 hr. Water (10 mL) was added to the reaction solution and extracted with ethyl acetate (30 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (20 mL×4), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by preparative TLC (2:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.5) to afford compound 31-9.
(250) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.44 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.15-7.10 (m, 1H), 7.07-7.03 (m, 1H), 3.84-3.80 (m, 1H), 3.60-3.56 (m, 1H), 3.28-3.23 (m, 1H), 3.10-2.83 (m, 3H), 2.58-2.44 (m, 3H), 2.28-2.02 (m, 3H), 0.85 (s, 9H), 0.01 (d, J=3.2 Hz, 6H).
(251) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 424, 426, found: 424, 426.
(252) Step 8
(253) By referring to the Step 1 of Example 1, compound 31-10 was obtained.
(254) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 371, found: 371.
(255) Step 9
(256) By referring to the Step 2 of Example 1, compound 31-11 was obtained.
(257) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 404, found: 404.
(258) Step 10
(259) By referring to the Step 3 of Example 1, compound 31-12 (i.e., Example 31) was obtained.
(260) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.48-8.38 (m, 2H), 8.15 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.52-7.40 (m, 3H), 4.98-4.94 (m, 1H), 3.69-3.60 (m, 1H), 3.56-3.46 (m, 2H), 3.29-3.17 (m, 2H), 3.09-3.04 (m, 1H), 2.67-2.55 (m, 2H), 2.50-2.44 (m, 1H), 2.42-2.33 (m, 2H), 2.28-2.17 (m, 1H), 1.46 (d, J=5.6 Hz, 6H).
(261) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 459, found: 459.
Example 32
(262) ##STR00183## ##STR00184## ##STR00185##
(263) Step 1
(264) Compound 32-1 (1.00 g, 2.73 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (20 mL). To the reaction solution was added m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (1.11 g, 5.46 mmol). The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 3 hours under nitrogen. Saturated sodium sulfite (20 mL) was added to the reaction solution, and the mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (50 mL×2). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated sodium sulfate (10 mL×3), saturated sodium bicarbonate (10 mL×3), and then saturated brine (10 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (5:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.5) to afford compound 32-2.
(265) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.39 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.12-7.06 (m, 1H), 4.91 (d, J=12.8 Hz, 1H), 3.11-2.97 (m, 1H), 2.91-2.79 (m, 2H), 2.75-2.68 (m, 1H), 2.55-2.40 (m, 2H), 2.34-2.19 (m, 1H), 2.04-1.91 (m, 1H), 1.51 (s, 2H), 1.45-1.26 (m, 9H).
(266) Step 2
(267) Compound 32-2 (940 mg, 2.46 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (15 mL). Sodium hydride (393 mg, 9.84 mmol) was added. The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 12 hours under nitrogen. Water (15 mL) was added to the reaction solution to quench the reaction. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (50 mL×2). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (20 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (3:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.4) to afford compound 32-3.
(268) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.38-7.36 (m, 1H), 7.15-7.07 (m, 2H), 4.43-4.23 (m, 2H), 3.96-3.87 (m, 1H), 3.82-3.71 (m, 1H), 3.08-2.96 (m, 1H), 2.84-2.82 (m, 1H), 2.61-2.45 (m, 1H), 2.18-1.94 (m, 4H), 1.77-1.73 (m, 1H), 1.05 (s, 9H).
(269) Step 3
(270) Compound 32-3 (190 mg, 0.497 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (6.00 mL). Tert-butyldimethylchlorosilane (149 mg, 0.994 mmol) and imidazole (101 mg, 1.49 mmol) were added. The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 12 hours under nitrogen. Water (10 mL) was added to the reaction solution and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (40 mL×2). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (20 mL×3), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (10:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.4) to afford compound 32-4.
(271) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 496, 498, found: 496, 498.
(272) Step 4
(273) By referring to the Step 6 of Example 1, compound 32-5 was obtained.
(274) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 443, found: 443.
(275) Step 5
(276) By referring to the Step 7 of Example 1, compound 32-6 was obtained.
(277) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 476, found: 476.
(278) Step 6
(279) By referring to the Step 8 of Example 1, compound 32-7 was obtained as a crude product.
(280) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 531, found: 531.
(281) Step 7
(282) Compound 32-7 (50.0 mg, 0.0942 mmol) was dissolved in dioxane (2 mL). Hydrochloride/dioxane (4 M, 235.58 μL) was added. The reaction solution was stirred at 50° C. for 2 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (hydrochloric acid system) to afford compound 32-8 (i.e., Example 32).
(283) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.46-8.37 (m, 2H), 8.25 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 5.00-4.92 (m, 1H), 4.00-3.82 (m, 2H), 3.59-3.44 (m, 2H), 2.70-2.52 (m, 2H), 2.48-2.36 (m, 2H), 2.35-2.26 (m, 1H), 2.24-2.12 (m, 1H), 1.46 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H), 1.36-1.26 (m, 1H).
(284) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 431, found: 431.
Example 33
(285) ##STR00186## ##STR00187##
(286) Step 1
(287) Compound 33-1 (7.50 g, 33.3 mmol) and tosylmethyl isocyanide (19.5 g, 100 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol (10.00 mL) and ethylene glycol dimethyl ether (150 mL). Potassium tert-butoxide (11.2 g, 100 mmol) was added at 0° C., and the mixture was stirred at 40° C. for 20 hours. The reaction solution was poured into water (100 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (100 mL×1). The organic phase was concentrated to afford a crude product. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=400:1 to 200:1) to afford compound 33-2.
(288) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.54 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.00 (t, J=5.6 Hz, 1H), 2.93-2.70 (m, 2H), 2.21-2.02 (m, 3H), 1.99-1.83 (m, 1H).
(289) Step 2
(290) Compound 33-2 (1.50 g, 6.35 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (20.0 mL). Lithium diisopropylamide (2 M, 4.13 mL) was added at −70° C., and the mixture was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour. Methyl bromoacetate (1.36 g, 8.89 mmol) was added at −70° C. and the mixture was stirred at 20° C. for 16 h. The reaction was quenched by the addition of water (100 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (100 mL×1). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate (1 g), filtered and concentrated to afford a crude product. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=40:1, 30:1, 10:1) to afford compound 33-3.
(291) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.55 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.09-2.87 (m, 2H), 2.86-2.79 (m, 2H), 2.39-2.24 (m, 2H), 2.09-1.88 (m, 2H).
(292) Step 3
(293) Compound 33-3 (1.46 g, 4.74 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (30.0 mL) and water (3.00 mL). Sodium borohydride (716.90 mg, 19.0 mmol) and cobalt chloride hexahydrate (4.51 g, 19.0 mmol) were slowly added at 0° C. The mixture was stirred at 0° C. for 5 hours. The reaction solution was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated. The residue was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=20:1, 10:1, 1:1) to afford compound 33-4.
(294) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.46 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.94 (s, 1H), 3.63-3.44 (m, 2H), 2.84-2.80 (m, 2H), 2.74-2.46 (m, 2H), 1.95-1.79 (m, 4H).
(295) Step 4
(296) Compound 33-4 (420 mg, 1.50 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (10.0 mL). Sodium hydride (69.1 mg, 1.73 mmol, purity 60%) was added portionwise at 0° C. under nitrogen. The mixture was stirred at 0° C. for 1 hour. Compound 33-5 (675 mg, 3.00 mmol) was then added and the mixture was stirred at 25° C. under nitrogen for 16 h. The reaction was quenched with water (50 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (50 mL×1). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate (500 mg), filtered and concentrated to afford a crude product. The crude product was purified by preparative TLC to afford compound 33-6.
(297) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.45 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (t, J=5.2 Hz, 2H), 3.76-3.60 (m, 2H), 3.48 (t, J=5.2 Hz, 2H), 2.87-2.79 (m, 2H), 2.77-2.57 (m, 2H), 1.94-1.77 (m, 4H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.07 (s, 6H).
(298) Step 5
(299) Compound 33-6 (400 mg, 0.912 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (10.0 mL). Zinc cyanide (321 mg, 2.74 mmol), 2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl (174 mg, 0.365 mmol) and tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium (167 mg, 0.182 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at 90° C. for 16 h under nitrogen. The reaction solution was concentrated. The residue was added into dichloromethane (100 mL) and filtered. The filter cake was washed with dichloromethane (50 mL). The filtrates were combined and concentrated to afford a crude product. The crude product was purified by preparative TLC to afford compound 33-7.
(300) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.53-7.44 (m, 2H), 7.27-7.23 (m, 1H), 3.76 (t, J=5.2 Hz, 2H), 3.71-3.53 (m, 2H), 3.49-3.36 (m, 2H), 3.04-2.90 (m, 2H), 2.74-2.43 (m, 2H), 1.93-1.76 (m, 4H), 0.82 (s, 9H), 0.01 (s, 6H).
(301) Step 6
(302) Compound 33-7 (320 mg, 0.832 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (10.0 mL). Hydroxyamine hydrochloride (173 mg, 2.50 mmol) and triethylamine (337 mg, 3.33 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at 80° C. for 40 hours. The mixture was concentrated. The residue was added into water (20 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×2). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate (1 g), filtered and concentrated to afford compound 33-8.
(303) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 418, found: 418.
(304) Step 7
(305) Compound 33-9 (107 mg, 0.512 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (5.00 mL). To the reaction solution were added 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (76.2 mg, 0.564 mmol) and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (123 mg, 0.641 mmol), and the mixture was stirred at 15° C. for 1 hour. Compound 33-8 (200 mg, 0.256 mmol) was then added, the mixture was stirred at 15° C. for 1 hour, and heated to 85° C. and stirred for 16 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated to afford a crude product. The crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 33-10 (i.e., Example 33).
(306) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.45-8.37 (m, 2H), 7.83 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (t, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.00-4.91 (m, 1H), 3.85 (d, J=10.4 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (t, J=5.6 Hz, 2H), 3.69 (d, J=10.4 Hz, 1H), 3.59-3.45 (m, 2H), 3.10 (t, J=6.2 Hz, 2H), 2.89-2.55 (m, 2H), 2.09-1.83 (m, 4H), 1.47 (d, J=6.2 Hz, 6H).
(307) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 473, found: 473.
Example 34
(308) ##STR00188## ##STR00189##
(309) Step 1
(310) Compound 34-1 (1.00 g, 4.50 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (15 mL). Lithium diisopropylamide (2 M, 2.93 mL, 5.86 mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction system at −78° C., and the reaction was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour. Methyl 2-bromopropionate (1.05 g, 6.30 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 16° C. for 16 hours. Water (20 mL) was added to the reaction solution and the reaction solution was extracted with ethyl acetate (40 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (60 mL×1), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=50:1 to 40:1) to afford compound 34-2.
(311) 1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.47 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.22-2.93 (m, 2H), 2.70-2.50 (m, 3H), 2.34-2.21 (m, 2H), 2.18-2.03 (m, 1H).
(312) Step 2
(313) Compound 34-2 (700 mg, 2.27 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (20 mL) and water (0.2 mL). Cobalt dichloride (1.18 g, 9.08 mmol) and sodium borohydride (172 mg, 4.54 mmol) were added portionwise to the reaction solution at −20° C. The reaction solution was reacted at −20° C. to 0° C. for 4 hours. After filtering the reaction solution, the filter cake was washed with dichloromethane (100 mL×2). The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford compound 34-3. The crude product was used in the next step directly without purification.
(314) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.−: 312 and 314, found: 312 and 314.
(315) Step 3
(316) Compound 34-3 (600 mg, 1.92 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (6 mL). Sodium hydroxide (154 mg, 3.84 mmol) was added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was reacted at 16° C. for 2 hours. Water (20 mL) was added to the reaction solution and the reaction solution was extracted with ethyl acetate (30 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was isolated by a preparative TLC plate (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=0:1) to afford compound 11-4.
(317) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 280 and 282, found: 280 and 282.
(318) Step 4
(319) Compound 34-4 (320 mg, 1.14 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (5 mL). Sodium hydride (91.2 mg, 2.28 mmol, 60% purity) was added portionwise at 0° C., and the reaction was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour. Compound 34-5 (545 mg, 2.28 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 16° C. for 16 hours. Water (20 mL) was added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was extracted with ethyl acetate (30 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (50 mL×1), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was isolated by thin layer chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=1:1) to afford compound 34-6.
(320) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.40 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H, 1H), 7.13-7.05 (m, 2H), 3.85-3.77 (m, 2H), 3.55-3.46 (m, 3H), 3.39-3.31 (m, 1H), 3.03-2.95 (m, 2H), 2.58-2.52 (m, 2H), 2.28-2.12 (m, 2H), 2.03-1.78 (m, 2H), 0.87 (s, 9H), 0.05 (s, 6H).
(321) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 438 and 440, found: 438 and 440.
(322) Step 5
(323) Compound 34-6 (340 mg, 0.775 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (10 mL). Zinc cyanide (273 mg, 2.33 mmol), tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium (142 mg, 0.155 mmol) and 2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl (148 mg, 0.310 mmol) was added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 90° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=1:2) to afford compound 34-7.
(324) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.52 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.41-7.37 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (s, 1H), 3.87-3.78 (m, 2H), 3.57-3.43 (m, 3H), 3.40-3.36 (m, 1H), 3.26-3.09 (m, 2H), 2.58-2.51 (m, 2H), 2.36-2.25 (m, 1H), 2.22-2.12 (m, 1H), 2.10-2.00 (m, 1H), 1.89-1.78 (m, 1H), 0.85 (s, 9H), 0.02 (s, 6H).
(325) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 385, found: 385.
(326) Step 6
(327) Compound 34-7 (240 mg, 0.624 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (6 mL). Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (130 mg, 1.87 mmol) and triethylamine (253 mg, 2.50 mmol) were added to the reaction solution. The solution was stirred at 60° C. for 15 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was concentrated under reduced pressure. Water (20 mL) was then added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (30 mL×1), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford compound 34-8.
(328) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 418, found: 418.
(329) Step 7
(330) Compound 34-9 (49.1 mg, 0.239 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (3 mL). To the reaction solution were added 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (32.4 mg, 0.239 mmol) and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (45.9 mg, 0.239 mmol). The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 1 hour. Compound 34-8 (100 mg, 0.239 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 1 hour. After the temperature was raised to 85° C., the reaction solution was stirred at 85° C. for 15 hours. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature and isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 34-10 (i.e., Example 34).
(331) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.47-8.36 (m, 2H), 8.09-8.02 (m, 2H), 7.49-7.36 (m, 2H), 5.00-4.91 (m, 1H), 3.78-3.72 (m, 2H), 3.63-3.33 (m, 6H), 2.64-2.50 (m, 2H), 2.41-2.26 (m, 2H), 2.14-2.03 (m, 1H), 1.91-1.77 (m, 1H), 1.46 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(332) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H]+473, found: 473.
Example 35
(333) ##STR00190## ##STR00191## ##STR00192##
(334) Step 1
(335) To a 100 ml reaction flask containing compound 35-1 (10.0 g, 47.4 mmol) was added toluene (48.0 mL), ethyl cyanoacetate (6.27 g, 55.4 mmol), ammonium acetate (7.3 g, 97.7 mmol) and acetic acid (22.0 mL). The reaction solution was heated to reflux and water was separated with a water separator for 24 hours. Once the reaction was complete, the reaction solution was concentrated until a large amount of solid precipitated. The solid was collected by filteration and dried to afford compound 35-2.
(336) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 306 and 308, found: 306 and 308.
(337) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 8.63 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (t, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.63-3.42 (m, 2H), 3.24-2.99 (m, 2H), 1.40 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H).
(338) Step 2
(339) Ethanol (50.0 mL) was added to a 100 ml reaction flask containing compound 35-2 (6.80 g, 22.2 mmol). A solution of potassium cyanide (3.62 g, 55.5 mmol) in water (15 mL) was added dropwise to the mixture at 20° C., and the reaction solution was reacted at 65° C. for 48 hours. After the reaction was completed, ethanol was evaporated under reduced pressure. Water (50.0 mL) was added to the residue, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (50 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, dried, filtered and concentrated. The evaporated residue was isolated by silica gel column chromatography (eluent gradient: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate=100:1 to 1:1) to afford compound 35-3.
(340) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.56 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.27-7.21 (t, J=8.0 Hz 1H), 3.26-3.06 (m, 2H), 2.95-2.92 (m, 2H), 2.85-2.78 (m, 1H), 2.51-2.45 (m, 1H).
(341) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 261 and 263, found: 261 and 263.
(342) Step 3
(343) To a 40 ml reaction flask containing compound 35-3 (2.80 g, 22.2 mmol) was added acetic acid (6.0 mL) and 78% sulfuric acid (2.1 mL). The mixture was reacted at 125° C. for 1.5 hours. After the reaction was completed, the reaction solution was cooled, poured into 50 ml of water and a large amount of solid was precipitated. The solid was collected by filtration, and dried to afford compound 35-4.
(344) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.45 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.17-7.10 (m, 1H), 7.07 (s, 1H), 3.33-3.21 (m, 1H), 3.13-3.03 (m, 1H), 3.01 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 2H), 2.82-2.77 (m, 1H), 2.25-2.19 (m, 1H).
(345) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 280 and 282, found: 280 and 282.
(346) Step 4
(347) Compound 35-4 (800 mg, 2.86 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (20 mL). Borane dimethyl sulfide complex (10 M, 1.14 mL) was slowly added dropwise at 0° C. The reaction solution was then stirred at 70° C. for 18 hours. To the reaction solution, methanol (20 mL) was slowly added dropwise, and the reaction was then stirred at 25° C. for 1 hour. Hydrochloric acid (1 M, 50 mL) was then added, and the reaction was stirred at 80° C. for 3 hours. The mixture was extracted with tert-butyl methyl ether (30 mL×3). An aqueous sodium hydroxide (1 M, 60 mL) was then added to the aqueous phase, and the mixture was extracted with chloroform/isopropanol (3:1 by volume) (50 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue is compound 35-5.
(348) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.27-7.19 (m, 1H), 7.05-6.98 (m, 2H), 3.09-3.07 (m, 2H), 2.94-2.84 (m, 4H), 2.04-1.82 (m, 4H).
(349) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 252 and 254, found: 252 and 254.
(350) Step 5
(351) Compound 35-5 (300 mg, 1.19 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (5 mL). Di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (519 mg, 2.38 mmol) and triethylamine (241 mg, 2.38 mmol) were added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 12 hours under nitrogen. Water (30 mL) was added to the reaction solution. The mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (30 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (20 mL×3), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by a preparative TLC plate (10:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.7) to afford compound 35-6.
(352) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.30-7.28 (m, 1H), 7.19-6.99 (m, 2H), 3.57-3.42 (m, 4H), 2.92-2.88 (m, 2H), 2.07-2.01 (m, 1H), 1.99-1.97 (m, 2H), 1.89-1.86 (m, 1H), 1.43 (s, 9H).
(353) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 352 and 354, found: 352 and 354.
(354) Step 6
(355) Compound 35-6 (350 mg, 0.994 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (5 mL). Zinc cyanide (233 mg, 1.99 mmol), 2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl (98.1 mg, 0.199 mmol) and tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium (91.0 mg, 0.0994 mmol) were added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 90° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature. Water (20 mL) was added to the reaction solution. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (20 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by a preparative TLC plate (5:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.5) to afford compound 35-7.
(356) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.43-7.41 (m, 1H), 7.31-7.29 (m, 1H), 7.25-7.21 (m, 1H), 3.47-3.32 (m, 4H), 3.09-3.06 (m, 2H), 2.07-1.97 (m, 3H), 1.91-1.89 (m, 1H), 1.43 (s, 9H).
(357) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 299, found: 299.
(358) Step 7
(359) Compound 35-7 (280 mg, 0.938 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (2 mL). Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (196 mg, 2.82 mmol) and triethylamine (379 mg, 3.75 mmol) were added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 80° C. for 12 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature. Water (20 mL) was added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (10 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (10 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by a preparative TLC plate (1:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.3) to afford compound 35-8.
(360) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.32-7.30 (m, 1H), 7.17-7.14 (m, 2H), 4.74 (s, 2H), 3.59-3.35 (m, 6H), 2.07-1.85 (m, 4H), 1.43 (s, 9H).
(361) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.−: 332, found: 332.
(362) Step 8
(363) Compound 35-9 (111 mg, 0.543 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (5 mL). To the reaction solution were added 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (147 mg, 1.09 mmol) and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (208 mg, 1.09 mmol). The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 0.5 hour under nitrogen. Compound 35-8 (180 mg, 0.543 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 1 hour. Then, the temperature was raised to 80° C., and the reaction solution was stirred at 80° C. for 12 hours. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and water (30 mL) was added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (30 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (20 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by a preparative TLC plate (1:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.8) to afford compound 35-10.
(364) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 8.45 (s, 1H), 8.38-8.35 (m, 1H), 8.09-8.07 (m, 1H), 7.43-7.39 (m, 2H), 7.16-7.13 (m, 1H), 4.85-4.79 (m, 1H), 3.59-3.38 (m, 6H), 2.24-2.18 (m, 3H), 2.01-2.00 (m, 1H), 1.53-1.49 (m, 15H).
(365) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 501, found: 501.
(366) Step 9
(367) Compound 35-10 (170 mg, 0.340 mmol) was dissolved in dioxane (3 mL). Hydrochloride/dioxane (4 M, 1 mL) was added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 12 hours under nitrogen. A saturated aqueous solution of sodium bicarbonate (20 mL) was added to the reaction solution. The mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (20 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue is compound 35-11.
(368) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 8.36 (s, 1H), 8.29-8.26 (m, 1H), 8.02-8.00 (m, 1H), 7.40-7.36 (m, 2H), 7.07-7.05 (m, 1H), 4.75-4.72 (m, 1H), 3.32-3.25 (m, 4H), 2.28-2.07 (m, 6H), 1.38 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(369) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 401, found: 401.
(370) Step 10
(371) Compound 35-11 (70.0 mg, 0.175 mmol) was dissolved in 1,2-dichloroethane (5 mL). Compound 35-12 (30.5 mg, 0.175 mmol) and titanium tetraisopropoxide (99.4 mg, 0.350 mmol) were added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 50° C. for 1 hour under nitrogen. Sodium triacetoxyborohydride (74.1 mg, 0.350 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 80° C. for 12 hours. After the temperature was raised to 80° C., the reaction solution was stirred at 80° C. for 12 hours. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and water (20 mL) was added. The mixture was filtered, and the filtrate was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (20 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by a preparative TLC plate (1:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.4) to afford compound 35-13.
(372) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 559, found: 559.
(373) Step 11
(374) Compound 35-13 (12.0 mg, 0.0215 mmol) was dissolved in dioxane (3 mL). Hydrochloride/dioxane (4 M, 1 mL) was added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 10 min under nitrogen. The reaction solution was cooled and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography to afford compound 35-14 (i.e., Example 35).
(375) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CD.sub.3OD) δ 8.48-8.43 (m, 2H), 8.15-8.12 (m, 1H), 7.54-7.52 (m, 1H), 7.48-7.46 (m, 2H), 5.00-4.99 (m, 1H), 3.97-3.91 (m, 4H), 3.62-3.44 (m, 6H), 2.44-2.24 (m, 4H), 1.47 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(376) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 445, found: 445.
Example 36
(377) ##STR00193## ##STR00194##
(378) Step 1
(379) Compound 36-1 (300 mg, 1.07 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (5 mL). Sodium hydride (64.3 mg, 1.61 mmol, 60% purity) was added portionwise at 0° C., and the reaction was stirred at this temperature for 30 min. Compound 36-2 (307 mg, 1.28 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 60° C. for 12 hours. Water (20 mL) was added to the reaction solution, and the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (30 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by a preparative TLC plate (3:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.3) to afford compound 36-3.
(380) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 7.39-7.37 (m, 1H), 7.06-7.02 (m, 1H), 6.96-6.95 (m, 1H), 3.78-3.76 (m, 2H), 3.69-3.68 (m, 2H), 3.25-3.22 (m, 1H), 3.03-2.97 (m, 1H), 2.90-2.88 (m, 2H), 2.72-2.69 (m, 1H), 2.14-2.01 (m, 1H), 0.81 (s, 9H), 0.05-0.00 (m, 6H).
(381) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 438 and 440, found: 438 and 440.
(382) Step 2
(383) Compound 36-3 (150 mg, 0.342 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (5 mL). Zinc cyanide (80.4 mg, 0.684 mmol) and tetrakis(triphenylphosphino)palladium (39.5 mg, 0.0342 mmol) were added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 100° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and water (10 mL) was added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (20 mL×3), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by a preparative TLC plate (1:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.4) to afford compound 36-4.
(384) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CD.sub.3OD) δ 7.58-7.56 (m, 1H), 7.40-7.30 (m, 2H), 3.78-3.75 (m, 2H), 3.64-3.61 (m, 2H), 3.34-3.33 (m, 1H), 3.28-3.26 (m, 1H), 2.98-2.96 (m, 2H), 2.69-2.67 (m, 1H), 2.29-2.26 (m, 1H), 0.82 (s, 9H), 0.03-0.00 (m, 6H).
(385) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 385, found: 385.
(386) Step 3
(387) Compound 36-4 (40.0 mg, 0.104 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (2 mL). Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (21.7 mg, 0.312 mmol) and triethylamine (42.1 mg, 0.416 mmol) were added to the reaction solution. The solution was stirred at 60° C. for 12 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and water (10 mL) was added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (10 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (10 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue is compound 36-5.
(388) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 418, found: 418.
(389) Step 4
(390) Compound 36-6 (14.7 mg, 0.0718 mmol) was dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (3 mL). To the reaction solution were added 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (19.4 mg, 0.144 mmol) and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (27.6 mg, 0.144 mmol). The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 0.5 hour under nitrogen. Compound 36-5 (30.0 mg, 0.0718 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the mixture was stirred at 25° C. for 1 hour. After the temperature was raised to 80° C., the reaction solution was stirred at 80° C. for 12 hours. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and water (10 mL) was added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, washed with saturated brine (10 mL×2), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography to afford compound 36-7 (i.e., Example 36).
(391) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, DMSO-d.sub.6) δ 8.53 (s, 1H), 8.43-8.40 (m, 1H), 8.06-8.03 (m, 1H), 7.57-7.55 (m, 1H), 7.47-7.45 (m, 2H), 5.01-4.95 (m, 1H), 3.56-3.54 (m, 4H), 3.43-3.41 (m, 2H), 3.12-3.08 (m, 1H), 3.01-2.96 (m, 1H), 2.63-2.62 (m, 1H), 2.32-2.30 (m, 1H), 1.39 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(392) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 473, found: 473.
Example 37
(393) ##STR00195## ##STR00196##
(394) Step 1
(395) Compound 37-1 (10.0 g, 47.3 mmol), potassium cyanide (6.17 g, 94.7 mmol), and ammonium carbonate (18.2 g, 189.5 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol (70 mL), and water (70 mL). The atmosphere of the reaction solution was replaced with nitrogen for three times, and the reaction solution was heated to 60° C., and stirred for 8 hours. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature and concentrated to 2/3 of the original volume. A white solid was precipitated. The solid was filtered, and the filter cake was washed with cold water (10 mL×3) and recrystallized from ethanol (30 mL) to afford compound 37-2.
(396) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, DMSO-d.sub.6) δ 8.45 (s, 1H), 7.56 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.01-2.95 (m, 2H), 2.60-2.53 (m, 1H), 2.23-2.15 (m, 1H). MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 281 and 283, found: 281 and 283.
(397) Step 2
(398) To a solution of compound 37-2 (1.00 g, 3.56 mmol) in water (10 mL) was added sodium hydroxide (997 mg, 24.92 mmol). The reaction solution was heated to 100° C. and stirred for 15 hours. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and adjusted to pH 7 with diluted hydrochloric acid (1 M) to afford a white solid. After filtration, the filter cake was washed with cold water (10 mL×3) and then acetone (5 mL) to afford compound 37-3.
(399) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, DMSO-d.sub.6) δ 7.47 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.04-2.96 (m, 2H), 2.73-2.67 (m, 1H), 2.11-2.01 (m, 1H).
(400) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 256 and 258, found: 256 and 258.
(401) Step 3
(402) To a solution of compound 37-3 (300 mg, 1.17 mmol) in methanol (8 mL) was added hydrochloride/methanol (2 mL, 4 M). The reaction solution was heated to 60° C. and stirred for 15 hours. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was washed with water (10 mL) and adjusted to pH 7 with a saturated aqueous solution of potassium carbonate. The aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated to afford compound 37-4.
(403) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, DMSO-d.sub.6) δ 7.51 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.02-2.92 (m, 2H), 2.68-2.64 (m, 1H), 2.12-2.02 (m, 1H).
(404) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 270 and 272, found: 270 and 272.
(405) Step 4
(406) To a solution of compound 37-4 (2.60 g, 9.63 mmol) in methanol (20 mL) was added sodium borohydride (729 mg, 19.26 mmol). The reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 3 hours. The reaction was quenched with water (20 mL). The methanol was removed by concentration under reduced pressure. The aqueous phase was extracted with dichloromethane (30 mL×3). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=10:1 to 1:1, R.sub.f=0.08) to afford compound 37-5.
(407) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 7.40 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.61-3.52 (m, 2H), 3.07-2.95 (m, 1H), 2.92-2.79 (m, 1H), 2.41-2.31 (m, 1H), 2.02-1.89 (m, 1H).
(408) Step 5
(409) To a solution of compound 37-5 (2.20 g, 9.09 mmol) in dichloromethane (30 mL) was added carbonyldiimidazole (2.21 g, 13.63 mmol) and triethylamine (5.04 mL, 36.36 mmol) at 0° C. The reaction solution was warmed to 25° C. and stirred for 15 hours. The reaction solution was quenched with water (20 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=10:1 to 1:1, R.sub.f=0.63) to afford compound 37-6.
(410) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 7.50 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 2.98-3.07 (m, 1H), 2.97-2.88 (m, 1H), 2.53-2.45 (m, 1H), 2.37-2.28 (m, 1H).
(411) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 268 and 270, found: 268 and 270.
(412) Step 6
(413) Compound 37-6 (1.50 g, 5.59 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (25 mL). The solution was cooled to 0° C. To the solution was added sodium hydride (447 mg, 11.18 mmol, purity 60%), and the reaction solution was stirred for 15 min. (2-bromoethoxy)-dimethyl-tert-butylsilane (2.01 g, 8.39 mmol) was slowly added to the reaction solution. The solution was slowly warmed to 25° C. and stirred for 2 hours. The reaction solution was quenched with water (10 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=10:1 to 1:1, R.sub.f=0.42) to afford compound 37-7.
(414) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 7.54 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.49-4.34 (m, 2H), 3.73-3.64 (m, 1H), 3.49-3.42 (m, 1H), 3.17-2.88 (m, 4H), 2.66-2.58 (m, 1H), 2.38-2.31 (m, 1H), 0.86 (s, 9H), 0.00 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 6H).
(415) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 426 and 428, found: 426 and 428.
(416) Step 7
(417) Compound 37-7 (1.00 g, 2.35 mmol), zinc cyanide (552 mg, 4.70 mmol), tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium (107 mg, 0.12 mmol), 2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl (112 mg, 0.23 mmol) were dissolved in acetonitrile (15 mL). The atmosphere of the reaction solution was replaced with nitrogen for three times, the reaction solution was heated to 80° C., and stirred for 15 hours. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was washed with water (10 mL) and ethyl acetate (10 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=10:1 to 4:1, R.sub.f=0.38) to afford compound 37-8.
(418) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 7.71 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.48-4.36 (m, 2H), 3.72-3.67 (m, 1H), 3.56-3.45 (m, 1H), 3.25-3.07 (m, 3H), 3.05-2.94 (m, 1H), 2.70-2.64 (m, 1H), 2.44-2.39 (m, 1H), 0.85 (s, 9H), 0.00 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 6H).
(419) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 373, found: 373.
(420) Step 8
(421) Compound 37-8 (700 mg, 1.88 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (10 mL). Triethylamine (1.04 mL, 7.52 mmol) and hydroxylamine hydrochloride (392 mg, 5.64 mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was heated to 80° C. and stirred for 15 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (10 mL) and washed with water (5 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=10:1 to 1:1, R.sub.f=0.17) to afford compound 37-9.
(422) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 7.50-7.43 (m, 1H), 7.38-7.31 (m, 2H), 4.43 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 3.72-3.38 (m, 1H), 3.61-3.51 (m, 1H), 3.23-3.00 (m, 3H), 2.96-2.93 (m, 1H), 2.56-2.50 (m, 1H), 2.29-2.24 (m, 1H), 0.85 (s, 9H), 0.00 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 6H).
(423) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 406, found: 406.
(424) Step 9
(425) 3-cyano-4-isopropoxybenzoic acid (101 mg, 0.49 mmol), 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (133 mg, 0.99 mmol), and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (187 mg, 0.99 mmol) were dissolved in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (4 mL). The atmosphere of the reaction solution was replaced with nitrogen for three times and the reaction solution was stirred at 25° C. for 1 hour. Compound 37-9 (200 mg, 0.49 mmol) was added to this solution and the mixture was stirred at 25° C. for 1 hour. The reaction solution was then heated to 90° C. and stirring was continued for 13 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by preparative high performance liquid chromatography (hydrochloric acid system) to afford compound 37-10 (i.e., Example 37).
(426) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.49-8.41 (m, 2H), 8.23 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.62-7.53 (m, 2H), 7.46 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.99-4.93 (m, 1H), 4.59-4.45 (m, 2H), 3.69-3.58 (m, 1H), 3.58-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.40-3.34 (m, 1H), 3.24-3.14 (m, 1H), 3.10-3.00 (m, 1H), 2.73-2.61 (m, 1H), 2.48-2.42 (m, 1H), 1.48 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(427) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 461, found: 461.
Example 38
(428) ##STR00197##
(429) Step 1
(430) Compound 38-1 (110 mg, 0.246 mmol) and compound 38-2 (125 mg, 0.258 mmol) were dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (5.00 mL). 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (18.0 mg, 0.0246 mmol), potassium carbonate (102 mg, 0.738 mmol) and water (1.00 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 80° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was concentrated. The residue was added into water (30 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (30 mL×2). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated. The crude product was isolated by a preparative TLC plate to afford compound 38-3.
(431) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 589, found: 589.
(432) Step 2
(433) Compound 38-3 (55.0 mg, 0.0934 mmol) was dissolved in ethyl acetate (5.00 mL). Hydrochloride/ethyl acetate (5.00 mL, 4 mol/L) was added. The mixture was stirred at 15° C. for 1 hour. The reaction solution was concentrated, and the residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 38-4 (i.e., Example 38).
(434) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.36-8.21 (m, 2H), 7.86 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.47-7.34 (m, 2H), 4.93-4.89 (m, 1H), 3.83-3.66 (m, 4H), 3.54-3.45 (m, 2H), 3.40-3.34 (m, 2H), 2.83-2.58 (m, 2H), 2.44-2.18 (m, 2H), 1.45 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(435) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 475, found: 475.
Example 39
(436) ##STR00198##
(437) Step 1
(438) Compound 39-1 (200 mg, 0.412 mmol) and compound 39-2 (82.2 mg, 0.412 mmol) were dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (5.00 mL). 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (30.2 mg, 0.0412 mmol), potassium phosphate (175 mg, 0.825 mmol) and water (1.00 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 100° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was concentrated to afford compound 39-3, and the crude product was used in the next step directly.
(439) Step 2
(440) Compound 39-3 (460 mg, crude) was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (4.00 mL). Compound 39-4 (130 mg, 0.452 mmol), potassium phosphate (384 mg, 1.81 mmol), 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (66.2 mg, 0.0905 mmol) and water (1.00 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 80° C. for 16 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated. The residue was isolated by preparative TLC to afford compound 39-5.
(441) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 589, found: 589.
(442) Step 3
(443) Compound 39-5 (98.0 mg, 0.163 mmol) was dissolved in EtOAc (5.00 mL). Hydrochloride/ethyl acetate (5.00 mL, 4N) was added. The mixture was stirred at 15° C. for 16 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 39-6 (i.e., Example 39).
(444) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.61-8.48 (m, 2H), 8.08 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.93-4.89 (m, 1H), 3.79-3.69 (m, 4H), 3.58-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.39-3.33 (m, 2H), 2.86-2.60 (m, 2H), 2.50-2.23 (m, 2H), 1.45 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(445) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 475, found: 475.
Example 40
(446) ##STR00199##
(447) Step 1
(448) Compound 40-1 (200 mg, 0.696 mmol) and compound 40-2 (139 mg, 0.696 mmol) were dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (5.00 mL). 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (51.0 mg, 0.0697 mmol), potassium phosphate (296 mg, 1.39 mmol) and water (1.00 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 80° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was concentrated to afford the compound 40-3, and the crude product was used in the next step directly.
(449) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 324 and 326, found: 324 and 326.
(450) Step 2
(451) Compound 40-3 (225 mg, crude) was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (4.00 mL). Compound 40-4 (327 mg, 0.694 mmol), potassium phosphate (147 mg, 0.694 mmol), 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (50.8 mg, 0.0694 mmol) and water (1.00 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 90° C. for 16 hours. The reaction solution was filtered, and the filter cake was washed with dichloromethane (20 mL). The filtrate was concentrated. The residue was isolated by thin layer chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=1:1) to afford compound 40-5.
(452) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 589, found: 589.
(453) Step 3
(454) Compound 40-5 (130 mg, 0.221 mmol) was dissolved in ethyl acetate (2.00 mL). Hydrochloride/ethyl acetate (2.00 mL, 4N) was added. The mixture was stirred at 16° C. for 1 hour. The reaction solution was concentrated, and the residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 40-6 (i.e., Example 40).
(455) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.36 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.31 (dd, J=2.4, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.24 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.49-7.45 (m, 1H), 7.43-7.36 (m, 2H), 4.97-4.90 (m, 1H), 3.75-3.71 (m, 4H), 3.55-3.45 (m, 4H), 2.83-2.57 (m, 2H), 2.43-2.16 (m, 2H), 1.45 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(456) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 475, found: 475.
Example 41
(457) ##STR00200##
(458) Step 1
(459) Compound 41-1 (85.0 mg, 0.263 mmol) and compound 41-2 (126 mg, 0.263 mmol) were dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (4 mL). 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (19.2 mg, 0.0263 mmol), potassium phosphate (112 mg, 0.526 mmol) and water (1 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 80° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was concentrated, and the residue was purified by preparative TLC to afford compound 41-3.
(460) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 588, found: 588.
(461) Step 2
(462) Compound 41-3 (105 mg, 0.0179 mmol) was dissolved in ethyl acetate (5 mL). Hydrochloride/ethyl acetate (5 mL, 4N) was added. The mixture was stirred at 10° C. for 24 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated, and the residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 41-4 (i.e., Example 41).
(463) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.24-8.15 (m, 2H), 7.99 (s, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.40-7.28 (m, 3H), 4.94-4.87 (m, 1H), 3.80-3.66 (m, 4H), 3.56-3.42 (m, 2H), 3.22-3.11 (m, 1H), 3.17 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.82-2.57 (m, 2H), 2.42-2.16 (m, 2H), 1.43 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(464) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 474, found: 474.
Example 42
(465) ##STR00201##
(466) Step 1
(467) Compound 42-1 (270 mg, 0.707 mmol) and compound 42-2 were dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (5.00 mL) and water (1 mL) at 16° C. Potassium phosphate (300 mg, 1.41 mmol), and 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (51.7 mg, 0.0707 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at 90° C. for 16 hours. The reaction solution was filtered, and the filter cake was washed with dichloromethane (60 mL). The filtrate was concentrated. The residue was isolated by silica gel chromatography column (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=2:1 to 0:1) to afford compound 42-3.
(468) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 572, found: 572.
(469) Step 2
(470) Compound 42-3 (290 mg, 0.507 mmol) was dissolved in EtOAc (5.00 mL). Hydrochloride/ethyl acetate (10 mL, 4N) was added. The mixture was stirred at 16° C. for 1 hour. The reaction solution was concentrated, and the residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 42-4 (i.e., Example 42).
(471) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.34-8.20 (m, 2H), 7.79-7.70 (m, 1H), 7.49 (s, 1H), 7.41-7.31 (m, 3H), 4.80-4.75 (m, 1H), 3.77-3.72 (m, 2H), 3.70 (s, 2H), 3.52-3.45 (m, 2H), 3.22-3.15 (m, 2H), 2.81-2.58 (m, 2H), 2.46-2.21 (m, 2H), 1.44 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H). MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 458, found: 458.
Example 43
(472) ##STR00202##
(473) Step 1
(474) Compound 43-2 (200 mg, 0.424 mmol) and compound 43-1 (137 mg, 0.424 mmol) were dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (5.00 mL) and water (1 mL). Potassium phosphate (180 mg, 0.848 mmol), and 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (31.0 mg, 0.0424 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at 90° C. for 16 hours. The reaction solution was filtered, and the filter cake was washed with dichloromethane (20 ml×2). The filtrate was concentrated. The residue was isolated by thin layer chromatography (silica, petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=1:1) to afford compound 43-3.
(475) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 587, found: 587.
(476) Step 2
(477) Compound 43-3 (120 mg, 0.193 mmol) was dissolved in ethyl acetate (2.00 mL). Hydrochloride/ethyl acetate (5.00 mL, 4N) was added. The mixture was stirred at 16° C. for 10 minutes. The reaction solution was concentrated, and the residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 43-4 (i.e., Example 43).
(478) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 7.90-7.84 (m, 2H), 7.51-7.45 (m, 1H), 7.38 (d, J=3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.31-7.25 (m, 3H), 7.22 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.85-4.74 (m, 1H), 3.78-3.74 (m, 2H), 3.69 (s, 2H), 3.55-3.43 (m, 2H), 3.22-3.14 (m, 2H), 2.80-2.58 (m, 2H), 2.37-2.15 (m, 2H), 1.41 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(479) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 473, found: 473.
Example 44
(480) ##STR00203##
(481) Step 1
(482) Compound 44-1 (200 mg, 0.696 mmol) was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (4.00 mL). Compound 44-2 (198 mg, 0.696 mmol), potassium phosphate (296 mg, 1.39 mmol), 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (51.0 mg, 0.0697 mmol) and water (1.00 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 80° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The mixture was concentrated. The residue was added into water (10 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (10 mL×2). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate (0.2 g), filtered and concentrated to afford a crude product. The crude product was purified by preparative TLC to afford compound 44-3.
(483) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 8.81 (s, 2H), 8.66 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.57 (d, J=2.0, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.82-4.71 (m, 1H), 1.46 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(484) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 318 and 320, found: 318 and 320.
(485) Step 2
(486) Compound 44-3 (50.0 mg, 0.115 mmol) and compound 44-4 (56.0 mg, 0.115 mmol) were dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (8.00 mL). Potassium carbonate (31.9 mg, 0.231 mmol), 1,1-bis(di-tert-butylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (7.52 mg, 0.0115 mmol) and water (2.00 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 80° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The mixture was concentrated and the residue was purified by preparative TLC to afford compound 44-5.
(487) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 583, found: 583.
(488) Step 3
(489) Compound 44-5 (80.0 mg, 0.127 mmol) was dissolved in EtOAc (5.00 mL). Hydrochloride/ethyl acetate (5.00 mL, 4N) was added. The mixture was stirred at 10° C. for 16 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated. The residue was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 44-6 (i.e., Example 44).
(490) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.96 (s, 2H), 8.74-8.69 (m, 2H), 7.47-7.42 (m, 2H), 7.42-7.38 (m, 1H), 7.35 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.96-4.91 (m, 1H), 3.82-3.73 (m, 4H), 3.59-3.46 (m, 2H), 3.15-3.06 (m, 2H), 2.85-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.41-2.14 (m, 2H), 1.46 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(491) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 469, found: 469.
Example 45
(492) ##STR00204##
(493) Step 1
(494) Compound 45-1 (200 mg, 0.698 mmol) was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (4 mL). Compound 45-2 (198 mg, 0.696 mmol), potassium carbonate (296 mg, 1.39 mmol), 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (51.0 mg, 0.0697 mmol) and water (1 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 60° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was concentrated, and the residue was dissolved in dichloromethane (30 mL) and washed once with water (20 mL). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated to afford a crude product. The crude product was purified by preparative TLC to afford compound 45-3.
(495) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 318 and 320, found: 318 and 320.
(496) Step 2
(497) Compound 45-3 (0.12 g, 0.377 mmol) and compound 45-4 (183 mg, 0.377 mmol) were dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (4 mL). 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (27.6 mg, 0.0377 mmol), potassium phosphate (160 mg, 0.754 mmol) and water (1 mL) were added. The mixture was stirred at 80° C. for 16 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was concentrated and the residue was dissolved in dichloromethane (30 mL) and washed with water (10 mL). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated to afford a crude product. The crude product was purified by preparative TLC to afford compound 45-5.
(498) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 583, found: 583.
(499) Step 3
(500) Compound 45-5 (72.0 mg, 0.124 mmol) was dissolved in ethyl acetate (4 mL). Hydrochloride/ethyl acetate (4 mL, 4 M) was added. The mixture was stirred at 5° C. for 24 hours. The reaction was concentrated to afford a crude product. The crude product was isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 45-6 (i.e., Example 45).
(501) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 9.11 (d, J=1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.87 (d, J=1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.40-8.31 (m, 2H), 7.64 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.47-7.34 (m, 2H), 7.30 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.85-4.80 (m, 1H), 3.82-3.68 (m, 4H), 3.57-3.41 (m, 2H), 3.27-3.14 (m, 2H), 2.83-2.55 (m, 2H), 2.34-2.10 (m, 2H), 1.43 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(502) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 469, found: 469.
Example 46
(503) ##STR00205##
(504) Step 1
(505) Compound 46-2 (90.7 mg, 0.184 mmol) and compound 46-1 (60.0 mg, 0.184 mmol) were dissolved in dioxane (5 mL) and water (1 mL). 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene palladium dichloride (13.5 mg, 0.0184 mmol) and potassium phosphate (78.0 mg, 0.368 mmol) were added to the reaction solution in one portion. The reaction solution was stirred at 90° C. for 12 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was filtered, and the filter cake was washed with dichloromethane (20 mL×2), and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (petroleum ether:ethyl acetate=1:1, R.sub.f=0.26) to afford compound 46-3.
(506) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 583, found: 583.
(507) Step 2
(508) Compound 46-3 (53.0 mg, 0.0863 mmol) was dissolved in ethyl acetate (2 mL). Hydrochloride/ethyl acetate (4 M, 5 mL) was added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 15° C. for 0.5 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated in vacuo and isolated by high performance liquid chromatography (formic acid system) to afford compound 46-4 (i.e., Example 46).
(509) .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.82 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 1H), 8.52-8.42 (m, 2H), 8.17 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 1H), 7.49-7.43 (m, 1H), 7.42-7.29 (m, 2H), 4.92-4.86 (m, 1H), 3.79-3.71 (m, 4H), 3.55-3.42 (m, 4H), 2.82-2.72 (m, 1H), 2.68-2.58 (m, 1H), 2.36-2.25 (m, 1H), 2.23-2.13 (m, 1H), 1.44 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(510) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 469, found: 469.
Example 47
(511) ##STR00206## ##STR00207##
(512) Step 1
(513) Compound 47-1 (60.0 mg, 0.150 mmol) was dissolved in 1,2-dichloroethane (5 mL). Compound 47-2 (19.2 mg, 0.150 mmol) and titanium tetraisopropoxide (85.2 mg, 0.300 mmol) were added to the reaction solution, and the mixture was stirred at 50° C. for 1 hour under nitrogen. Sodium triacetoxyborohydride (63.5 mg, 0.300 mmol) was then added to the reaction solution, and the reaction solution was stirred at 80° C. for 12 hours. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and water (20 mL) was added. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by a preparative TLC plate (1:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f=0.6) to afford compound 47-3 (12.0 mg) in a yield of 12%.
(514) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 513, found: 513.
(515) Step 2
(516) Compound 47-3 (12.0 mg, 0.0234 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (2 mL) and water (0.5 mL). Lithium hydroxide (3.9 mg, 0.0936 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at 60° C. for 3 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by preparative high performance liquid chromatography (hydrochloric acid system) to afford compound 47-4 (i.e., Example 47).
(517) 1H NMR (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.36-8.32 (m, 2H), 8.02 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.42-7.34 (m, 2H), 4.86-4.85 (m, 1H), 3.93-3.84 (m, 1H), 3.54 (s, 1H), 3.40-3.28 (m, 3H), 3.22-3.20 (m, 3H), 2.99-2.90 (m, 1H), 2.65-2.57 (m, 2H), 2.47-2.37 (m, 2H), 2.26-2.18 (m, 3H), 1.37 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(518) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 499, found: 499.
(519) Step 3
(520) The compound 47-4 was subjected to chiral resolution to afford the compound 47-4 isomer 1, the compound 47-4 isomer 2, the compound 47-4 isomer 3 and the compound 47-4 isomer 4.
(521) SFC isolation method:
(522) Chromatography column: DAICEL CHIRALPAK AD (250 mm*30 mm, 10 um)
(523) Mobile phase: A: carbon dioxide; B: methanol (containing 0.1% NH3.H2O);
(524) Flow rate: 70 mL/min;
(525) Column temperature: 38° C.
(526) Compound 47-4 isomer 1, retention time: 3.674 minutes. .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, DMSO-d.sub.6) δ 8.52 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.41 (dd, J=2.0, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.69-7.89 (m, 1H), 7.57 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.95-5.02 (m, 1H), 4.11-4.17 (m, 1H), 3.67-3.87 (m, 2H), 3.02-3.32 (m, 6H), 2.63-2.79 (m, 2H), 2.20-2.43 (m, 3H), 1.96-2.18 (m, 2H), 1.39 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(527) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 499, found: 499.
(528) Compound 47-4 isomer 2, retention time: 5.124 minutes. .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, DMSO-d.sub.6) δ 8.51 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.40 (dd, J=2.4, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (t, J=5.2 Hz, 1H), 7.69-7.89 (m, 1H), 7.56 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.95-5.01 (m, 1H), 3.87-4.2 (m, 1H), 3.69-3.85 (m, 2H), 2.98-3.32 (m, 6H), 2.55-2.82 (m, 2H), 2.29-2.48 (m, 3H), 1.96-2.27 (m, 2H), 1.39 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(529) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 499, found: 499.
(530) Compound 47-4 isomer 3, retention time: 5.238 minutes. .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, DMSO-d.sub.6) δ 8.51 (s, 1H), 8.40 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.69-7.88 (m, 1H), 7.57 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.45-7.54 (m, 1H), 4.95-5.01 (m, 1H), 3.81-3.99 (m, 1H), 3.69-3.76 (m, 2H), 2.91-3.32 (m, 6H), 2.55-2.68 (m, 2H), 2.21-2.48 (m, 3H), 1.96-2.19 (m, 2H), 1.39 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(531) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 499, found: 499.
(532) Compound 47-4 isomer 4, retention time: 7.157 minutes. .sup.1H NMR: (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.35-8.30 (m, 2H), 8.0 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 1H), 4.93-4.80 (m, 1H), 3.78-3.72 (m, 1H), 3.54-3.42 (m, 3H), 3.39-3.25 (m, 3H), 2.88-2.81 (m, 1H), 2.67-2.50 (m, 2H), 2.40-2.30 (m, 2H), 2.30-2.12 (m, 4H), 1.36 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(533) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 499, found: 499.
Example 48
(534) ##STR00208##
(535) Step 1
(536) Compound 48-1 (100 mg, 0.250 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (6 mL). Compound 48-2 (38.2 mg, 0.250 mmol), potassium carbonate (104 mg, 0.749 mmol) and sodium iodide (112 mg, 0.749 mmol) were added to the reaction solution. The reaction solution was stirred at 90° C. for 2 hours under nitrogen. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature, and water (10 mL) was added. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL×3). The organic phases were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was isolated by a preparative TLC plate (1:1 petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, R.sub.f32 0.6) to afford compound 48-3.
(537) .sup.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) δ 8.44 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.35 (dd, J=2.0, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.83-4.77 (m, 1H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.46 (s, 2H), 3.33-3.31 (m, 2H), 3.03-2.95 (m, 2H), 2.93-2.86 (m, 2H), 2.37-2.26 (m, 1H), 2.23-2.02 (m, 3H), 1.49 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H).
(538) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 473, found: 473.
(539) Step 2
(540) Compound 48-3 (40.0 mg, 0.0847 mmol) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (2 mL) and water (0.5 mL). Lithium hydroxide (14.2 mg, 0.339 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at 25° C. for 12 hours. The reaction solution was concentrated under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by preparative high performance liquid chromatography (hydrochloric acid system) to afford compound 48-4 (i.e., Example 48).
(541) .sup.1H NMR (400 MHz, Methanol-d.sub.4) δ 8.47-8.39 (m, 2H), 8.12 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.54-7.42 (m, 2H), 5.02-4.95 (m, 1H), 4.33 (s, 2H), 3.82-3.75 (m, 3H), 3.45-3.40 (m, 2H), 3.32-3.31 (m, 1H), 2.40-2.33 (m, 4H), 1.47 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 6H)
(542) MS-ESI calculated for [M+H].sup.+: 459, found: 459.
Assay Example 1
(543) Assay method:
(544) I. Cell processing
(545) 1. A PathHunter cell strain was thawed according to standard procedures;
(546) 2. The cell was seeded in 20 μl 384-well microplates and incubated at 37° C. for an appropriate time.
(547) II. Agonist
(548) 1. For an agonist assay, the cell was incubated with the sample to be tested to initiate a reaction;
(549) 2. The stock to be tested is diluted 5 folds to be a buffer solution;
(550) 3. The 5-fold diluted solution (5 μL) was added to the cells and incubated at 37° C. for 90-180 minutes. The solvent concentration was 1%.
(551) III. Signal detection
(552) 1. 12.5 μL or 15 μL of PathHunter detection reagent (50 vol. %) was added in one portion and then incubated for 1 hour at room temperature to generate a detection signal;
(553) 2. The microplate was read using a PerkinElmer Envision™ instrument for chemiluminescent signal detection.
(554) IV. Data analysis
(555) 1. Compound activity analysis was performed using a CBIS Data Analysis Kit;
(556) 2. Calculation formula:
% activity=100%×(average RLU of sample to be test-average RLU of solvents)/(average maximum control ligand−average RLU of solvents)
(557) Assay Results:
(558) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 assay results of S1P1 receptor agonistic activity Assay sample (compounds prepared in each example) S1P1 receptor agonistic activity Example 1 + Example 2 + Example 3 + Example 4 + Example 5 + Example 6 + Example 7 + Example 8 + Example 9 +++ Example 10 +++ Example 11 +++ Example 12 + Example 13 + Example 14 + Example 15 + Example 16 + Example 17 + Example 18 + Example 19 + Example 20 ++ Example 21 +++/+++/+++ mixture/isomer 1/isomer 2 Example 22 +++ Example 23 ++ Example 24 +++ Example 25 +++ Example 26 +++ Example 27 ++ Example 28 +++ Example 29 +++ Example 30 ++ Example 31 ++ Example 32 ++ Example 33 +++ Example 34 +++ Example 35 +++ Example 36 +++ Example 37 ++ Example 38 +++ Example 39 ++ Example 40 +++ Example 41 +++ Example 42 ++ Example 43 ++ Example 44 +++ Example 45 +++ Example 46 + Example 47 +++ Example 48 +++ Note: “+” >100 nM; 100 nM ≥ “++” > 10 nM; “+++” ≤10 nM Conclusion: The compounds disclosed herein have significant and even unexpected S1P1 receptor agonistic activity.
Assay Example 2
Evaluation of Compounds' Pharmacokinetics
(559) Objective: To test the pharmacokinetics of compounds in SD rats in vivo.
(560) Assay Materials:
(561) Sprague Dawley rats (male, 200-300 g, 7-9 weeks old, Shanghai Slack)
(562) Assay Procedures:
(563) The pharmacokinetics profile of the compound in rodent after intravenous injection and oral administrations was tested using a standard protocol. In the assay, the candidate compound was formulated into a clear solution, and was given to the rats through a single intravenous injection and oral administration. The vehicles for the intravenous injection and oral administration were an aqueous hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin solution or dimethyl sulfoxide in aqueous PEG400 solution in a proper proportion. The whole blood samples were collected within 24 hours, centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 minutes, and plasma samples were obtained by separating the supernatant. 4 times volume of acetonitrile solution containing an internal standard was added to precipitate proteins. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected, to which an equal volume of water was added, and further centrifuged to collect the supernatant. The LC-MS/MS method was used to quantitatively analyze the plasma concentration, and the pharmacokinetics parameters, such as peak concentration, peak time, clearance rate, half-life, area under the curve, and bioavailability were calculated.
(564) Assay results:
(565) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Pharmacokinetic assay results Half life Concentration Clearance T.sub.1/2 integral AUC Bioavailability Assay sample (mL/min/kg) (h) (nM .Math. hr) F (%) Ozanimod 46.3 5.24 1123 41.6 (3 mpk) Example 9 2.52 99.3 4352 89.4 (2 mpk) Example 21 8.65 3.02 12636 100 Isomer 1 (3 mpk) Example 21 11.6 3.22 8483 89.6 Isomer 2 (3 mpk) Example 47 8.81 3.98 5656 48.7 Isomer 3 (3 mpk) Example 47 11.6 3.22 8483 89.6 Isomer 4 (3 mpk) Conclusion: The compounds disclosed herein can significantly increase the single or multiple index of rat pharmacokinetics.