Double-row four-point contact ball bearing

Abstract

A double-row four-point contact ball bearing 100 according to the present invention includes an outer ring 102, an inner ring 104, and balls 106 and 108 that are arranged in two rows between the outer ring 102 and the inner ring 104 and each have four contact points. Inner side contact angles α of the balls 106 and 108 arranged in the two rows are set such that lines of action L1 and L2 that extend respectively connecting center points of the balls 106 and 108 and contact points of the balls do not cross each other in the outer ring 102.

Claims

1. A double-row four-point contact ball bearing comprising: an outer ring with an outer diameter D, an inner ring, and balls that are arranged in two rows between the outer ring and the inner ring, each ball with four contact points, and with a pitch circle diameter PCD, wherein inner side contact angles α on the outer ring side of the balls arranged in the two rows are set such that lines of action that extend respectively connecting center points of the balls and contact points of the balls do not cross each other in the outer ring or the inner ring and the relationship P>(D−PCD)/2×tan α×2 is satisfied.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a double-row four-point contact ball bearing according to an embodiment of the present invention in an enlarged scale.

(2) FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining effects of the present invention.

INDEX TO THE REFERENCE NUMERALS

(3) An index to the reference numerals used in the description follows: 100 . . . double-row four-point contact ball bearing; 102 . . . outer ring; 104 . . . inner ring; 106 . . . ball; 108 . . . ball; 110 . . . outer surface

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(4) The following describes an embodiment of the present invention with reference to the accompanying drawings. Dimensions, materials, other specific numerical values, and the like described in the embodiment are merely examples to facilitate understanding of the invention, and do not limit the present invention unless otherwise stated. It should be noted that elements that have substantially the same function and configuration are denoted with the same reference signs in the specification and drawings and repetitive description of these elements is omitted. Further, illustration or description of elements that do not directly relate to the present invention is omitted.

(5) FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a double-row four-point contact ball bearing 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention in an enlarged scale. As shown in FIG. 1, the double-row four-point contact ball bearing 100 includes an outer ring 102 and an inner ring 104, which are bearing rings, and balls 106 and 108 that are arranged in two rows between the outer ring 102 and the inner ring 104 and each have four contact points.

(6) Disclosed embodiments of the double-row four-point contact ball bearing 100 include measures for suppressing deformation of the bearing rings while suppressing an increase in the overall dimensions. The double-row four-point contact ball bearing 100 is used, for example, in a state where the outer ring 102 is inserted into a housing or the like of an apparatus. In this case, in conventional systems, if the thickness of the outer ring 102 is such that the outer ring 102 may elastically deform, then the creep phenomenon may occur. Therefore, in some embodiments disclosed herein, in the double-row four-point contact ball bearing 100, inner side lines of action L1 and L2 of the balls 106 and 108 on the outer ring 102 side are dispersed so as not to cross each other, so that, if an external load is applied to the outer ring 102, the external load can be dispersed.

(7) The following describes detailed conditions for dispersing the lines of action L1 and L2 in the outer ring 102. First, the lines of action L1 and L2 are lines that extend respectively connecting the center points (for example, center point C) of the balls 106 and 108 and contact points of the balls. In this embodiment, the balls 106 and 108 arranged in the two rows each have an inner side contact angle α on the outer ring 102 side, and the contact angle α is set such that the line of action L1 and the line of action L2 do not cross each other in the outer ring.

(8) P represents the distance between the centers of the balls 106 and 108 in the axial direction. P1 represents the point of intersection between a line extending in the radial direction from the center point C of the ball 106 and an outer surface 110 of the outer ring 102, and P2 represents the point of intersection between the line of action L1 or L2 extending from an inner side contact point of the ball 106 or 108 and the outer surface 110 of the outer ring 102. In order to disperse the lines of action L1 and L2 so that they do not cross each other, the distance from the point P1 to the point P2 is set to P/2 or less. This condition of the distance from P1 to P2 will be expressed using a mathematical formula below.

(9) D represents the outer diameter of the outer ring 102, and PCD represents the pitch circle diameter of the ball 106. FIG. 1 shows half (½) of the entire cross section of the double-row four-point contact ball bearing 100. Based on the above, the distance from the center point C of the ball 106 to the point P1 can be expressed using Formula 1 below.
Distance from center point C to point P1=(D−PCD)/2  Formula 1

(10) Using above Formula 1 and the contact angle α, the distance from the point P1 to the point P2 can be expressed using Formula 2 below.
Distance from point P1 to point P2=(D−PCD)/2×tan α  Formula 2

(11) As described above, in order to disperse the lines of action L1 and L2 so that they do not cross each other, the distance from the point P1 to the point P2 needs to be set to P/2 or less. Above Formula 2 being P/2 or less can be expressed using Formula 3 below.
P>(D−PCD)/2×tan α×2  Formula 3

(12) If the relationship of above Formula 3 is satisfied, dispersion of the lines of action L1 and L2 in the outer ring 102 can be realized. If the outer ring 102 is embodied such that the condition expressed using above Formula 3 is satisfied, the lines of action L1 and L2 of the balls 106 and 108 arranged in the two rows are dispersed without crossing each other on the outer ring 102 side. As a result, an external load applied to the outer ring 102 can be dispersed to prevent local concentration of the load. As described above, the condition expressed using above Formula 3 makes it possible to favorably suppress elastic deformation of the outer ring 102 without relying on increasing the thickness or the like.

(13) FIG. 2 shows diagrams for explaining the effects of the invention. FIG. 2(a) shows analysis results of the amount of deformation of the outer ring for an embodiment example and a comparative example, and FIG. 2(b) shows corresponding dimensions of analyzed objects. The analysis results in FIG. 2(a) only show outer diameter surfaces of outer rings, and the deformation ratio is shown in an enlarged scale. It can be confirmed from the analysis results shown in FIG. 2(a) that, in the embodiment example, the range of deformation is wider and the maximum deformation amount is smaller than those in the comparative example. On the other hand, in the comparative example, the range of deformation is narrower and the maximum deformation amount is larger than those in the example.

(14) Differences in dimensions between the embodiment example (Top Row) and the comparative example (Bottom Row) will be described with reference to FIG. 2(b). The items shown in the top row in FIG. 2(b) correspond to the dimensions shown for the embodiment example in FIG. 1. From left to right, P represents the distance in the axial direction between centers of balls arranged in two rows, D represents the outer diameter of the outer ring, PCD represents the pitch circle diameter of the balls, and α represents the inner side contact angle on the outer ring side of the balls arranged in the two rows. Results obtained by substituting values of these items into above Formula 3 (P>(D−PCD)/2×tan α×2) are shown in the right end column. It should be noted that the unit of each distance is mm.

(15) A major difference between the embodiment example and the comparative example is that the contact angle α is set to 20° in the embodiment example and 30° in the comparative example. As a result, in the embodiment example, the right side of Formula 3 shown in the right end column is 5.8 mm, which is not greater than P (distance between the centers of the balls of 8.4 mm) on the left side (8.4>5.8), so that the relationship of Formula 3 is satisfied. On the other hand, in the comparative example, the right side of Formula 3 is 9.2 mm, which is greater than P (distance between the centers of the balls of 8.4 mm) on the left side (8.4>9.2), thus, the relationship of Formula 3 is not satisfied.

(16) FIG. 2(c) is a schematic diagram showing cross sections in the embodiment example and the comparative example. In the embodiment example, the lines of action are dispersed in the outer ring as a result of the relationship of above Formula 3 being satisfied. On the other hand, in the comparative example, the lines of action overlap in the outer ring as a result of the relationship of Formula 3 not being satisfied.

(17) As a result of the above, in the analysis results shown in FIG. 2(a), the range of deformation is wide and the maximum deformation amount is small in the embodiment example. In contrast, the range of deformation is narrow and the maximum deformation amount is large in the comparative example. These results show that deformation of the outer ring is suppressed in the embodiment example, and therefore the creep phenomenon is unlikely to occur.

(18) In the embodiment, the lines of action L1 and L2 are dispersed so as not to cross each other in the outer ring 102 (see FIG. 1) to suppress deformation of the outer ring 102. At this time, the contact angles of the balls 106 and 108 may be set to different angles from each other, if the lines of action L1 and L2 can be dispersed. Furthermore, deformation of the inner ring 104 can also be suppressed based on the same technical idea. For example, on the inner ring 104 side, inner side contact angles of the balls 106 and 108 arranged in the two rows are set such that lines of action of the respective balls do not cross each other in the inner ring 104. With this configuration, an external load applied to the inner ring 104 can also be dispersed and elastic deformation of the inner ring can be favorably suppressed without relying on increasing the thickness or the like.

(19) Although one embodiment of the present invention has been described with reference to the drawings, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to this embodiment. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that various variations and modifications can be arrived at within the scope of the appended claims, and those variations and modifications should be understood to be included within the technical scope of the present invention.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

(20) The present invention can be applied to double-row four-point contact ball bearings.