METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PREVENTING A FORWARD FLIP-OVER OF A SINGLE-TRACK MOTOR VEHICLE

Abstract

A method for preventing a forward flip-over or a flip-over about the vehicle transverse axis of a single-track motor vehicle, during a braking action of its front wheel. In the method, a lift-off indicator parameter is ascertained, which represents the flip-over hazard by a rear wheel at risk of lifting off or already having lifted off the ground surface, and the braking force at the front wheel is reduced as a function thereof to prevent a flip-over.

Claims

1. A method for preventing a forward flip-over of a single-track motor vehicle during a braking action of a front wheel, the method comprising the following steps: ascertaining a lift-off indicator parameter, which represents a flip-over hazard by a rear wheel at risk of lifting off a ground surface or already lifted off the ground surface; and reducing a braking force at the front wheel as a function of the ascertained lift-off indicator parameter to prevent a flip-over.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein, as the flip-over hazard increases, a faster braking force reduction at the front wheel occurs, and/or a stronger braking force reduction at the front wheel occurs.

3. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein the lift-off indicator parameter is ascertained as a function of a pitch angle of the motor vehicle, a pitch angle velocity of the motor vehicle, and a float angle of the rear wheel.

4. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein: a pitch angle indicator parameter is ascertained as a function of the pitch angle of the motor vehicle; a pitch angle velocity indicator parameter is ascertained as a function of the pitch angle velocity of the motor vehicle; a float angle indicator parameter is ascertained as a function of the float angle of the rear wheel; and the lift-off indicator parameter is ascertained as a function of the pitch angle indicator parameter, the pitch angle velocity indicator parameter, and the float angle indicator parameter.

5. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein the lift-off indicator parameter is ascertained by summation of the pitch angle indicator parameter, the pitch angle velocity indicator parameter, and the float angle indicator parameter).

6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the single-track motor vehicle is a motorcycle.

7. A device, including a control unit configured to prevent a forward flip-over of a single-track motor vehicle during a braking action of a front wheel, the control unit being configured to: ascertain a lift-off indicator parameter, which represents a flip-over hazard by a rear wheel at risk of lifting off a ground surface or already lifted off the ground surface; and reduce a braking force at the front wheel as a function of the ascertained lift-off indicator parameter to prevent a flip-over.

8. The device as recited in claim 7, wherein the device is an anti-lock braking system.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0019] FIG. 1 shows the determination of the stability indicator in the form of a block diagram for one specific embodiment; and

[0020] FIG. 2 shows the sequence of one embodiment of the method according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

[0021] Modern two-wheelers are usually equipped as standard with an inertia measuring technology which is used to detect different vehicle dynamics data. These vehicle dynamics data allow the ascertainment of a stability indicator, which represents the stability of the two-wheeler with respect to a lift-off hazard of the rear wheel or, going beyond that, of a lifted-off rear wheel. As a function thereof, a present braking force or a present braking pressure may be reduced at the front wheel. As a result, the contact force of the rear wheel increases again, and the rear wheel is thus brought more firmly against the roadway. A lifted-off rear wheel is brought back onto the roadway by the pressure reduction at the front wheel.

[0022] The estimation for parameters such as the pitch angle, the pitch rate, and also the float angle takes place, for example, in the control unit of the anti-lock braking system. Furthermore, the wheel speeds may also be incorporated in the ascertainment of the aforementioned parameters.

[0023] The stability indicator is an abstracted parameter for mapping the stability of a two-wheeler with respect to a lift-off of the rear wheel during a brake application. In one configuration stage, the value may range between 0 and 1, 0 representing a stable two-wheeler, and 1 representing an unstable two-wheeler. A stable two-wheeler in this connection means that the rear wheel has a good, permanent ground contact, while a maximally unstable two-wheeler has a highly lifted-off rear wheel just prior to the flip-over of the motorcycle. An additionally increased instability is present when the lifted-off rear wheel is heavily laterally offset and has a large float angle.

[0024] To form the stability indicator, at least one of the following parameters is evaluated: [0025] the pitch angle; [0026] the pitch rate; and [0027] the float angle.

[0028] The pitch angle is the rotation angle of the two-wheeler about its transverse axis. The pitch rate is the time derivative of the pitch angle, or the change of the pitch angle per unit of time, and may also be referred to as the pitch angle velocity.

[0029] The structure of one example embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. Pitch angle N, pitch rate dN/dt as well as float angle S serve as input variables. In block 101, a parameter I1 which represents the flip-over hazard resulting from the pitch angle is ascertained from pitch angle N. In block 102, a parameter I2 which represents the flip-over hazard resulting from the pitch rate is ascertained from pitch rate dN/dt, and in block 103, the flip-over hazard resulting from the float angle, which is represented by indicator parameter I3, is ascertained based on float angle S of the rear wheel.

[0030] In blocks 101, 102 and 103, characteristic curves are shown in each case by way of example, the respective input variable N or dN/dt or S being plotted in the x-axis direction, and the associated indicator parameter I1 or I2 or I3 being plotted in the y-axis direction.

[0031] While three indicator parameters I1, I2 and I3 are ascertained in FIG. 1, in the simplest case an indicator or criterion may be derived from only one of the input variables. The characteristic curves shown in blocks 101, 102 and 103 are represented as linear characteristic curves. In the simplest case, however, these characteristic curves may also only represent a query as to whether the input variable has exceeded a predefined threshold value. For example, I1=1 is set when pitch angle N exceeds a predefined threshold value NO. However, if N<N0, then I1=0 is set.

[0032] Of course, the individual characteristic curves may also map arbitrarily complex, non-linear relationships.

[0033] In block 104, parameters I1, I2 and I3 are suitably combined, and a lift-off indicator parameter I is ascertained therefrom.

[0034] In the simplest case, the sub-criteria are added, i.e., I=I1+I2+I3. I may be limited to a maximum value of 1 by a standardization.

[0035] Of course, a more complicated combination of the individual indicators may also take place.

[0036] The sequence of one example embodiment of the method in accordance with the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 2. After the start of the method in block 200, in block 201 the output signals of the sensors are evaluated, and the respective indicator values based thereon are calculated. The stability indicator is calculated from the individual values in block 202. This indicator is evaluated in a next step 203. Depending on the result of the evaluation, a different adaptation of the braking force level at the front wheel brake occurs in block 204.

[0037] When, in block 204, the value of the indicator, for example, exceeds a previously set maximum value threshold, this means a high likelihood for a rear wheel at risk of lifting off or having lifted off. A downward adaptation of the braking force is thus carried out. If the indicator indicates a stable vehicle, the braking force level may even be upwardly adapted at the front wheel. The braking force level always remains below or equal to the driver's specification in the process, i.e., does not exceed the driver's specification.

[0038] The method restarts by the back-coupling from block 203 to block 201 and ends in block 205 when the driver ends the brake application.