Free spinning hub for mortar projectiles
10996031 ยท 2021-05-04
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F42B10/64
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F42B10/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
Abstract
A precision guided munition with a fin assembly comprising a free spinning hub to which the fins attach addresses the need to roll control a projectile while eliminating the problems of the fin kit. The fin hub, to which the fins are attached, is radially decoupled from the mortar tail boom thus allowing it and the fins to spin freely relative to the body without coupling any of the spin. Advantageously, the need for a bearing between the hub and the tail boom is negated.
Claims
1. A fin assembly for a fin stabilized projectile comprising a fin hub to which one or more fins are attached and which is radially decoupled from a tail boom of the fin stabilized projectile thereby allowing the fin assembly to spin freely relative to a body of the fin stabilized projectile wherein the fin hub is slidingly fit over the tail boom.
2. The fin assembly of claim 1 wherein the fin assembly is axially restrained by an igniter head of the fin stabilized projectile.
3. The fin assembly of claim 1 wherein a radial gap between the inner diameter of the fin assembly and the outer diameter of the tail boom is in the range of approximately 0.003 inches to approximately 0.008 inches.
4. The fin assembly of claim 1 wherein a mismatch between a polar moment of inertia of the fin assembly and a polar moment of inertia of the tail boom and a body of the fin stabilized projectile allows the fin assembly to spin freely relative to the body of the fin stabilized projectile.
5. The fin assembly of claim 4 wherein the polar moment of the fin assembly is approximately twenty-nine times less than the polar moment of inertia of the tail boom and the body.
6. The fin assembly of claim 1 wherein a spin rate mismatch between the fin assembly and the tail boom and a body of the fin stabilized projectile allows the fin assembly to spin freely relative to the body of the fin stabilized projectile.
7. The fin assembly of claim 6 wherein the one or more fins each comprise a tip with a cant angle to achieve a desired spin rate.
8. The fin assembly of claim 6 wherein each of the one or more fins comprise a beveled leading edge and a beveled trailing edge to achieve a desired spin rate.
9. The fin assembly of claim 1 wherein the fin stabilized projectile is a mortar projectile.
10. A precision guided mortar comprising: a body; a canard set extending radially beyond the body to execute control commands; a tail boom extending axially from a rear of the body; a fin assembly slidingly fit over the tail boom and comprising a fin hub to which one or more fins are attached and which is radially decoupled from a tail boom of the mortar thereby allowing the fin assembly to spin freely relative to the tail boom and the body; an igniter assembly inserted into the tail boom and further comprising an igniter head which extends beyond the tail boom to restrain the fin assembly in an axial direction.
11. The fin assembly of claim 10 wherein a radial gap between the inner diameter of the fin assembly and the outer diameter of the tail boom is in the range of approximately 0.003 inches to approximately 0.008 inches.
12. The fin assembly of claim 10 wherein a polar moment of inertia mismatch between the fin assembly and the tail boom and body of the fin stabilized projectile allows the fin assembly to spin freely relative to the body.
13. The fin assembly of claim 12, wherein the polar moment of the fin assembly is approximately twenty-nine times less than the polar moment of inertia of the tail boom and body.
14. The fin assembly of claim 10 wherein a spin rate mismatch between the fin assembly and the tail boom and body allows the fin assembly to spin freely relative to the body.
15. The fin assembly of claim 14 wherein the one or more fins each comprise a tip with a cant angle to achieve a desired spin rate.
16. The fin assembly of claim 14 wherein each of the one or more fins comprise a beveled leading edge and a beveled trailing edge to achieve a desired spin rate.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) In the drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, like or corresponding parts are denoted by like or corresponding reference numerals.
(2)
(3)
(4)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(5) A precision guided munition with a fin assembly comprising a free spinning hub to which the fins attach addresses the need to roll control a projectile while eliminating fin induced roll torque due to the fins and the fin-canard interaction. The fin hub, to which the fins are attached, is radially decoupled from the mortar tail boom, or cartridge boom, thus allowing it and the fins to spin freely relative to the body without coupling any of the spin to the body. Advantageously, the fin hub is decoupled without the use of a bearing. Bearings are costly, complicated and are not be suitable for applications with limited space such as a mortar round. Additionally, for mortars the fin and hub assembly sits in the chamber embedded with the propellant. During firing the particulates generated make for an increased propensity to binding for any type of bearing system.
(6)
(7) The tail boom 30 extends axially from the body 10 of the projectile 2. The tail boom 30 is a long hollow cylinder which receives the igniter assembly 50 within the cylindrical opening and the fin assembly 40 on the outer surface. In addition, the tail boom 30 provides a mounting surface for the fin assembly 40 and additional propelling charges. As will be described further below, the fin assembly 40 comprises a fin hub and one or more attached fins. The igniter provides a propelling charge for the mortar and further serves to restrain the fin assembly 40 on one side in the axial direction.
(8) While the projectile 2 shown in
(9)
(10) The fin assembly 40 comprises a hub 402 to which one or more fins 410 are attached. The fin hub 402 has a body 404 defining a hollow cylindrical interior 406 sized and dimensioned to fit over the tail boom 30 of the projectile 2. One or more fins 410 extend radially outward from the fin hub 402. To generate a significant amount of roll torque on the fin assembly 40, each of the fins 410 have a cant angle on their tip and leading and trailing edge bevels.
(11) In the embodiment shown in
(12) Additionally, while the fin assembly 40 shown in
(13) The tail boom 30 extends axially from the body 10 of the projectile 2. The fin hub 402 is sized and dimensioned to fit slidingly over a portion of the outer surface 302 of the tail boom 30. A 0.003-0.008 radial gap exists between the inner diameter of the hub 402 and the outer diameter of the tail boom 30. In an embodiment, the fin hub 402 is held in place axially on the tail boom 30 between the standard igniter head 502 on the M1020 ignition assembly 50 and a lip 304 formed between portions of varying diameter on the outer surface and extending around the tail boom 30. When the ignition assembly 50 is inserted into the hollow interior of the tail boom 30, the igniter head 502 extends beyond the tail boom 30 thereby creating a flange which restrains the fin assembly 40 in the axial direction.
(14) The fin assembly 40 is able to decouple from the tail boom 30 and spin freely without a bearing due to the small radial gap between the tail boom 30 and the fin assembly 40 in combination with both a large inertial mismatch between the hub 402 and body 10 and the significant roll torque on the fin assembly 40. A substantial polar moment of inertia mismatch exists between the fin assembly 40 and the tail boom 30 and a body 10 of the projectile 2 due to the design of these components. In the embodiments shown in
(15) Further, the cant angle on the fin tips and the beveled leading and trailing edges of the fins 410 impart a significant roll torque on the fin assembly 40. Along with the polar moment mismatch, these two factors ensure that the fins 410 spin up to their fill rate quickly and that any kinetic friction between the sliding surfaces does not significantly reduce the spin rate.
(16) While the invention has been described with reference to certain embodiments, numerous changes, alterations and modifications to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims, and equivalents thereof.