Recrystallized HI-6 Dimethylsulfate
20210138359 ยท 2021-05-13
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
The present invention is directed at the synthesis and characterization of recrystallized HI-6 dimethylsulfate (DMS). The method can comprise dissolving HI-6 DMS in an alkyl-based glycol and adding an antisolvent to recrystallize HI-6 DMS or dissolving HI-6 DMS in methanol and adding dimethoxy ethane or dimethyl formamide as the antisolvent to recrystallize HI-6 DMS. The recrystallized HI-6 DMS indicates a resistance to moisture absorption and/or a DSC melting point onset (MP Onset) at least at or above 160.0 C.
Claims
1. A method for recrystallizing HI-6 DMS comprising: dissolving HI-6 DMS in an alkyl-based glycol and adding an antisolvent to recrystallize HI-6 DMS.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said alkyl-based glycol comprises ethylene glycol.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said alkyl-based glycol comprises 1,2-propane diol.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said antisolvent is selected from tert-butanol.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein said antisolvent is selected from acetonitrile.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said antisolvent is selected from ethanol.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said antisolvent is selected from dimethoxy ethane.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein said alkyl-based glycol comprises 1,2-propane diol and said recrystallized HI-6 DMS indicates a DSC melting point onset (MP Onset) at least at or above 160.0 C.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein said alkyl-based glycol comprises 1,2-propane diol and said recrystallized HI-6 DMS indicates a DSC melting point at least at or above 165.0 C.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein said alkyl-based glycol comprises ethylene glycol and said antisolvent comprises tert-butanol.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein said recrystallized HI-6 DMS does not absorb water over a seven-day period under ambient temperature and humidity conditions.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein said alkyl-based glycol comprises 1,2-propane diol and said antisolvent comprises tert-butanol.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein said recrystallized HI-6 DMS does not absorb water over a seven-day period under ambient temperature and humidity conditions.
14. A method for producing recrystallized HI-6 DMS comprising: dissolving HI-6 DMS in methanol and adding dimethoxy ethane or dimethyl formamide as the antisolvent to recrystallize HI-6 DMS.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein the antisolvent comprises DMF and said recrystallized HI-6 DMS indicates a DSC melting point onset (MP Onset) at least at or above 160 C.
16. The method of claim 14 wherein the antisolvent comprises DMF and said recrystallized HI-6 DMS indicates a DSC melting point at least at or above 165.0 C.
17. Recrystallized HI-6 DMS having a DSC melting point onset (MP Onset) at least at or above 160.0 C.
Description
FIGURES
[0008]
[0009]
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0031] The present invention relates to the synthesis and characterization of recrystallized HI-6 dimethylsulfate (DMS). HI-6 DMS is otherwise identified as (1-(2-(hydroxyiminomethyl)pyridinium)-3-(4-carbamoylpyridinium)-2-oxapropane) DMS, whose structure is illustrated below:
##STR00001##
[0032] It was determined herein that preferably, to prepare a recrystallized form of HI-6 DMS, one can now utilize a polyol solvent, which is reference herein to an alkyl-based glycol, which is reference to an aliphatic carbon-hydrogen structure containing at least two hydroxy groups. Preferably ethylene glycol and/or 1,2-propane diol. Table 1 below identifies the maximum solubility of HI-6 DMS in the indicated solvents:
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 HI-6 DMS Solvents Solvent Maximum Solubility (% w/w) Water 118.35 Ethylene Glycol 14.153 Methanol 7.577 1,2-Propane Diol 2.847
[0033] In connection with Table 1 above, it was observed that HI-6 DMS was highly soluble in the alkylene glycol glycerol, but that there was no saturation point (i.e. maximum solubility) observed as the solution became too viscous.
[0034] Next, a series of antisolvents were identified, where the maximum solubility of HI-6 DMS in such antisolvents is shown below in Table 2. Reference to an antisolvent is a solvent that can be combined with the HI-6 DMS when dissolved in the preferred solvents in Table 1 (i.e. ethylene glycol and/or 1,2-propane diol) to provoke precipitation and recrystallization of the HI-6 DMS.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 HI-6 DMS Antisolvents AntiSolvent Maximum Solubility (% w/w) Dimethyoxy ethane 0.338 Tert-butanol 0.257 Acetonitrile 0.124 DMF 0.1067 Ethanol 0.056 Isopropyl alcohol 0.03
[0035] It is noted that single solvent recrystallization was conducted for comparison to the binary solvent systems noted above (i.e. solvent/antisolvent). For the comparative single solvent recrystallization, methanol and water were utilized as the solvent followed by cooling to provide for precipitation and recrystallization. Methanol and water were observed to produce crystals upon cooling to room temperature. In addition, when the diols were employed as a single solvent system (ethylene diol and 1,2-propane diol), they would produce oils when concentrating such solutions. However, when such oils were then treated with a relatively small amount (e.g., up to 1.0 ml) of an antisolvent, such as tert-butanol, the oils would otherwise crystallize.
[0036] In Table 3 below, a summary is provided regarding the use of identified binary solvent system with the identified solvent A and the identified non-solvent B:
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Binary Solvent System For HI-6 Recrystallization Antisolvent B t-BuOH MeCN EtOH DMF DME Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio (A:B) mL (A:B) mL (A:B) mL (A:B) mL (A:B) mL Solvent A MeOH 1:3 4 1:15 16 1:1 2 1:2 2 1:1 2 ethylene 1:4 5 1:11 11 1:8 9 N/A N/A glycol 1,2- 1:2 3 1:5 6 1:5 5 N/A 1:9 10 propane diol Water N/A N/A 1:14 1:23 N/A
[0037] As can be seen from the above, using methanol (MeOH), ethylene glycol, 1,2-propane diol and water as the solvent, and tert-butanol (t-BuOH), acetonitrile (MeCN), ethanol (EtOH), dimethylformamide (DMF) and dimethoxy ethane (DME), one was able to identify which binary combinations produced crystals and at what ratios. In the Table 3, reference to N/A are those binary solvent systems that were observed to produce oils instead of observed crystal formation. When crystals were formed they could be readily isolated by filtration. Accordingly, it can be seen that ethylene glycol and 1,2-propane diol can be utilized as solvent for HI-6 DMS wherein the addition of an antisolvent (e.g., t-BuOH, MeCN or EtOH) results in recrystallization.
[0038] Samples of the HI-6 DMS crystal polymorphs produced from the binary solvent systems (Table 3) as well as the comparative samples (produced from a single solvent system noted herein) were dried under vacuum for 12-16 hours and then analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at a heating rate of 10 C. per minute. Melting point onset was defined by the inflection point of the DSC endotherm from the DSC baseline and the melting point was then defined as the peak in the observed endothermic tracing provided by the DSC. The decomposition temperature herein is reference to the decomposition onset which is defined as that temperature where the DSC tracing deviated from the DSC baseline followed by a relatively erratic trace. The results are summarized below in Tables 4 and 5:
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Recrystallized HI-6 Characterization By DSC Mp Onset Mp Decomp. Solvent Antisolvent ( C.) ( C.) ( C.) Ethylene N/A 160.48 165.87 168.11 Glycol t-BuOH 133.42 140.5 146.96 MeCN N/A N/A 164.41 EtOH 134.86 144.34 153.27 Methanol N/A 118.22 133.93 137.25 t-BuOH 162.93 170.97 172.01 EtOH 167.03 172.37 172.94 DME N/A N/A 166.08 DMF 165.26 168.08 169.79 MeCN 161.26 167.07 168.2 1,2-propane N/A 144.87 149.07 161.51 diol EtOH 140.9 147.22 150.71 MeCN 146.23 153.7 157.45 DME 163.39 167.08 167.99 t-BuOH 142.68 144.4 149.15 H.sub.2O N/A 131.11 135.40 142.80 EtOH NA NA 167.61 DMF 161.98 170.19 171.62 Unprocessed N/A 162.33 168.08 168.87 HI-6 Average N/A 149.81 156.14 160.88
[0039] In the above table, reference to N/A in the Mp Onset or Mp column is reference to the observation that the sample would decompose prior to melting. In the case of ethylene glycol and 1,2-propane diol, reference to N/A in the column Antisolvent is reference to the fact that, as noted above, when such solvents were employed on their own and concentrated, such would lead to oil formation which oil could then be converted to recrystallized HI-6 DMS upon treatment with a relative small amount (e.g. up to 1.0 ml) of tert-butanol.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Summary Of DSC Analysis In Table 4 Averages Mp Onset Mp Decomp. Solvent ( C.) Ave ( C.) Ave ( C.) Ave t-BuOH 146.34 3.47 151.96 4.18 156.04 4.84 EtOH 147.6 2.21 154.64 1.5 161.13 0.25 DME 163.39 13.58 167.08 10.94 167.04 6.16 DMF 163.62 13.81 169.14 13 170.71 9.83 MeCN 153.75 3.94 160.39 4.25 163.35 2.47 Ethylene 142.92 6.89 150.24 5.9 156.11 4.77 Glycol MeOH 154.94 5.13 162.48 6.34 164.04 3.16 1,2-propane 147.61 2.2 152.29 3.85 157.36 3.52 diol H.sub.2O 146.55 3.26 152.8 3.34 157.21 3.67 Average 149.81 N/A 156.14 N/A 160.88 N/A
[0040] As can be seen, Table 4 identifies the particular solvent and non-solvent combination that were evaluated. Table 5 provides the average values of melting point onset, melting point, and decomposition temperature from Table 4 when generally using the identified antisolvent B (t-BuOH, EtOH, DME, DMF and MeCN). In addition, Table 4 then provides such average values when specifically using ethylene glycol, MeOH, 1,2-propane diol and water, in the particular binary solvent systems identified in Table 4. As can be seen, HI-6 DMS can be: (1) dissolved in ethylene glycol and caused to precipitate and recrystallize upon addition of antisolvents t-BuOH and EtOH; (2) dissolved in 1,2-propane diol and caused to precipitate and recrystallize upon addition of antisolvents EtOH, MeCN, DME and t-BuOH. As can also be observed from Table 5, when using DME or DMF as antisolvents, values for Mp Onset, Mp and Decomposition Temperature determined by DSC were relatively higher than for other antisolvents. As can be seen, the MP Onset was at least at or above 160.0 C. and Mp was at least at or above 165.0 C.
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060] Samples of the various recrystallized HI-6 DMS were then placed in a weighing dish and left out at ambient temperature (18 C. to 30 C.) and ambient humidity (50% to 60%) to evaluate moisture uptake. The results are provided in Table 6:
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Moisture Uptake of Recrystallized HI-6 From Identified Solvent-Antisolvent Systems Day Ave mg/day Solvent Anti solvent 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (%) Methanol DMF 9.3 8.9 9.1 8.9 8.9 8.6 8.6 1.429 tBuOH 6.2 6.5 6.3 6.5 6.4 6.6 6.6 1.111 EtOH 9.4 10 9.5 9.6 9.5 9.9 10 1.368 DME 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.8 6.7 7.1 6.9 1.045 MeCN 5.3 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.7 1.364 N/A 17.2 16.6 16.2 16.3 16.7 16.6 0.988 Ethylene Glycol tBuOH 17.2 15.9 15.4 15.4 15.4 15.4 15.2 0.26 EtOH 8.2 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.3 0.741 MeCN 7 6.9 6.9 7 7.1 7.2 7.1 0.87 N/A 10.5 10.7 10.6 10.3 10.7 10.4 0.216 1,2-propane diol tBuOH 19.2 15.9 12.7 13 12.8 12.7 12.7 0.236 DME 10.2 8.1 7.9 8.2 8 8.2 8.3 1.013 MeCN 5.3 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.9 4.9 4.9 1.739 EtOH 7.5 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.7 0.299 N/A 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.2 0.159 Sample wt (mg)
[0061] As noted above, reference to N/A in the column marked Antisolvent, in the case of ethylene glycol and 1,2-propane diol, is reference to the fact that such solvents were utilized on their own to dissolve HI-6 DMS, which solutions were then concentrated providing an oil, which upon treatment of a relatively small amount of tert-butanol, led to recrystallization.
[0062] As can be seen from Table 6, the samples underwent some initial loss in weight, which is attributed to residual solvent loss. As can therefore now be seen, when forming by dissolving HI-6 DMS in ethylene glycol and then utilizing tBuOH as the antisolvent, one provides a recrystallized HI-6 DMS that steadily lost weight under ambient temperature and ambient humidity conditions. Similarly, by dissolving HI-6 DMS in 1,2-propane diol and then utilizing tBuOH as the antisolvent, one provides a recrystallized HI-6 DMS that also steadily lost weight under ambient temperature (25 C.) and humidity conditions (50-60% relative humidity). It may therefore be appreciated that such result is of significant benefit from the perspective that the goal herein was to provide HI-6 DMS with the characteristic that it would then show relatively lower hydroscopic performance. That is, relatively low levels of water absorption, or even resistance to water absorption, to improve their shelf life stability and better maintain their performance as an OPNA reactivator when maintained in storage prior to use within an injectable formulation, such as in an autoinjector.
Experimental
General Procedure for Solubility Determination
[0063] Solvent was added to relatively small (100 mg) amounts of HI-6 DMS in a 20 mL vial and adding and heated on a hot plate to effect dissolution, then allowed to cool to room temperature. This process was repeated until either most of the HI-6 DMS was solubilized after the heat-cool cycle, or 20 mL of solvent was reached. When most of the solids were dissolved, the saturated solution was filtered, the solution was weighed and the solvent removed under reduced pressure. The weight of HI-6 DMS recovered divided by the weight of the solvent added determined the solubility. See Table 1.
General Procedure for Binary Solvent System Evaluation
[0064] For the moderately soluble solvents (MeOH, 1,2-propane diol), 1 mL was added to relatively small (50 mg) amounts of HI-6 DMS and heated to effect dissolution and was allowed to cool to room temperature. Antisolvent was then added until the mixture become cloudy and solvents precipitated. The mixture was then heated until a homogeneous solution was achieved, then allowed to cool to room temperature and allowed to crystalize. If only relatively small amounts of crystals formed, more antisolvent was added and the process repeated. For the relatively highly soluble solvents (ethylene glycol, water) the process was done in reverse: where antisolvent was added first and small amounts of the solvent were added. See Tables 1 and 2.
General Procedure For Recrystallization
[0065] For the single solvent recrystallization conditions, HI-6 DMS (100 mg) was dissolved in the appropriate solvent according to the maximum solubilities as determined in Table 1. The solutions were then concentrated under vacuum until precipitate was observed. The mixture was then heated and then allowed to cool to room temperature to produce HI-6 DMS crystals. For ethylene glycol and 1,2-propane diol, no crystals formed upon concentration and instead produced oils. These oils were titrated with 1 mL tBuOH, at room temperature, which causes crystals of HI-6 DMS to form.
[0066] Two procedures were used to determine the binary solvent recrystallization conditions. For the relatively lower solubilizing solvents MeOH and 1,2-propane diol, a sample of HI-6 DMS (100 mg) was dissolved in those solvents and the chosen anti-solvent was added until the mixture become cloudy. The mixture was then heated and then allowed to cool to room temperature. The process was repeated until 50% of the HI-6 DMS had recrystalized. For the relatively higher solubilizing solvents ethylene glycol and water, a sample of HI-6 DMS (100 mg) was slurried in the antisolvent of choice and small amounts of the solubilizing solvent was added. The mixture was then heated and then allowed to cool to room temperature. The process was repeated until most of the HI-6 DMS dissolved upon heating. See Table 3.
Analysis By NMR
[0067] An authentic sample of HI-6 DMS was dissolved in deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-D.sup.6) and a .sup.1H-NMR spectrum was obtained. All peaks were assigned and the spectrum was used as the baseline to determine how much water and solvents were present in the samples. Samples (10 mg) of the of the HI-6 DMS crystals were dried in a vacuum overnight and dissolved in deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-D.sup.6) fresh from an ampule to minimize adventitious water. .sup.1H-NMR spectrums were taken and the peak at 6.36 ppm (CH.sub.2) was chosen as the reference peak for HI-6 DMS and the relative ratios between the crystallization solvents and water (3.37 ppm) was determined. The solvate ratios were determined by normalizing the peak integrations by the number of protons to get the molar ratios, then rounding to the nearest half mol fraction. The results are listed in Table 7.
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Solvent (A) Antisolvent (B) HI-6:A HI-6:B HI-6:H.sub.2O Prediction MeOH N/A tBuOH N/A N/A 1:3.11 HI-6 .Math. 3 H.sub.2O DME N/A N/A 1:3.13 HI-6 .Math. 3 H.sub.2O EtOH N/A N/A 1:3.20 HI-6 .Math. 3 H.sub.2O DMF N/A N/A 1:3.03 HI-6 .Math. 3 H.sub.2O DMF.sup.a N/A N/A 1:2.71 HI-6 .Math. 2.5 H.sub.2O MeCN 1:0.95 1:0.64 1:5.13 HI-6 .Math. 1 MeOH .Math. 0.5 MeCN .Math. 5 H.sub.2O ethylene glycol N/A EtOH 1:1.13 1:4.47 1:4.70 HI-6 .Math. 1 ethylene glycol .Math. 4.5 EtOH .Math. 4.5 H.sub.2O MeCN 1:0.38 N/A 1:2.38 HI-6 0.5 ethylene glycol .Math. 2.5 H.sub.2O tBuOH 1:0.42 N/A 1:4.72 HI-6 .Math. 0.5 ethylene glycol .Math. 4.5 H.sub.2O tBuOH.sup.a 1:0.06 N/A 1:1.13 HI-6 .Math. 1 H.sub.2O 1,2-propane diol N/A DME 1:2.64 N/A 1:4.07 HI-6 .Math. 2.5 1,2-propane diol .Math. 4 H.sub.2O EtOH 1:0.56 N/A 1:1.40 HI-6 .Math. 0.5 1,2-propane diol .Math. 1.5 H.sub.2O Me CN 1:0.58 N/A 1:1.98 HI-6 .Math. 0.5 1,2-propane diol .Math. 2 H.sub.2O tBuOH 1:0.62 1:5.27 1:2.14 HI-6 .Math. 0.5 1,2-propane diol .Math. 5 tBuOH .Math. 2 H.sub.2O tBuOH.sup.a N/A N/A 1:1.79 HI-6 .Math. 1.5 H.sub.2O H.sub.2O N/A N/A N/A 1:1.72 HI-6 .Math. 1.5 H.sub.2O EtOH N/A N/A 1:0.87 HI-6 .Math. 1 H.sub.2O DMF N/A N/A 1:1.63 HI-6 .Math. 1.5 H.sub.2O HI-6 unprocessed N/A N/A N/A 1:1.13 HI-6 .Math. 1 H.sub.2O
[0068] Most samples from the MeOH series seemed to produce trihydrates, the sample in MeCN however contained both MeOH and MeCN. In contrast to this, the ethylene glycol and 1,2-propane diol samples all contained solvent. The samples crystalized from water contained less water than those obtained from other solvents, estimating at either mono or sesquihydrates. During a subsequent deliquescent test, some samples showed continued weight loss during the seven day experiment, namely the MeOH/DMF, ethylene glycol/tBuOH and 1,2-propane diol/tBuOH samples. These samples were analyzed by NMR after the test to see how the ratios between water and residual solvents changed. Surprisingly, the residual solvent disappeared and the overall water content decreased to the ratios obtained with the water crystallizations.
Analysis by X-Ray Powder Diffraction
[0069] Samples of each binary solvent crystallization were sent to Triclinic Labs for analysis by x-ray powder diffraction. The fourteen samples were visually separated into three groups: A) crystalline samples with a number of discrete diffraction peaks across the range of measured 2, B) a sample with a broad baseline indicating amorphous character and C) a crystalline sample with peaks of relatively strong intensity at 24.04 and 28.92 . An overlay of group A can be found in
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Crystal Dimentions Solvent Antisolvent symmetry spacegroup a () b () c () V ({circumflex over ()}3) MeOH tBuOH orthorhombic Pcab 37.17 16.228 6.969 4203.664 EtOH orthorhombic Pcab 37.218 16.246 6.98 4220.413 DME orthorhombic Pcab DMF orthorhombic Pcab 37.137 16.243 6.976 4208.037 MeCN orthorhombic Pcab 37.17 16.228 6.969 4203.664 1,2-propane diol EtOH orthorhombic Pcab 37.171 16.245 6.986 4218.446 MeCN orthorhombic Pcab 37.138 16.252 6.975 4209.878 DME orthorhombic Pcab 37.144 16.305 7.033 4259.416 tBuOH orthorhombic Pcab 37.194 16.193 6.947 4184.056 Ethylene Glycol EtOH orthorhombic Pcab 37.138 16.252 6.975 4209.878 tBuOH orthorhombic Pcab 37.188 16.277 6.983 4226.873 MeCN orthorhombic Pcab 37.159 16.309 6.97 4224.002 Water EtOH orthorhombic Pcab 37.17 16.228 6.969 4203.664 DMF orthorhombic Pcab 37.301 16.233 6.973 4222.201
[0070] While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the various exemplary embodiments herein, it will be understood by those of skill in the art that various changes in form may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.