AEROSOL-GENERATING ARTICLE HAVING WRAPPER COMPRISING AN EMBOSSED PORTION
20230404140 ยท 2023-12-21
Assignee
Inventors
- Clement BESSO (Neuchatel, CH)
- Frederic Ulysse BUEHLER (Neuchatel, CH)
- Onur DAYIOGLU (Neuchatel, CH)
- Stefan Lauenstein (Cormondreche, CH)
US classification
- 1/1
Cpc classification
A24D1/18 A24D1/18
A24C5/01 A24C5/01
A24D1/20 A24D1/20
A24D1/02 A24D1/02
A24C5/005 A24C5/005
A24F40/20 A24F40/20
International classification
Abstract
An aerosol-generating article is provided, including: a rod of aerosol-generating substrate; and a paper wrapper wrapped around at least a portion of the aerosol-generating article, the paper wrapper including an embossed portion circumscribing the rod of aerosol-generating substrate along at least 80 percent of the length of the rod and having a basis weight of from 50 grams per square meter to 100 grams per square meter. A method of producing an aerosol-generating article is also provided.
Claims
1.-15. (canceled)
16. An aerosol-generating article, comprising: a rod of aerosol-generating substrate; and a paper wrapper wrapped around at least a portion of the aerosol-generating article, the paper wrapper comprising an embossed portion circumscribing the rod of aerosol-generating substrate along at least 80 percent of the length of the rod and having a basis weight of from 50 grams per square meter to 100 grams per square meter.
17. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, wherein the paper wrapper has a basis weight of from 60 grams per square meter to 70 grams per square meter.
18. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, wherein the paper wrapper has a basis weight of from 75 grams per square meter to 80 grams per square meter.
19. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, wherein at least the embossed portion of the paper wrapper is a water-resistant wrapper.
20. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, further comprising: a plurality of segments assembled together longitudinally, the plurality of segments including the rod of aerosol-generating substrate, wherein the paper wrapper is wrapped around the rod of aerosol-forming substrate and at least one other of the plurality of segments; and a layer of adhesive on an inner surface of the paper wrapper, the layer of adhesive circumscribing at least two of the plurality of segments to thereby keep the at least two segments in place relative to each other.
21. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 20, wherein the layer of adhesive covers at least 50 percent of an area of the inner surface of the paper wrapper.
22. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 21, wherein the layer of adhesive on the inner surface of the paper wrapper has a mass of from 15 milligrams to 45 milligrams.
23. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 21, wherein the layer of adhesive on the inner surface of the paper wrapper has a mass of from 25 milligrams to 35 milligrams.
24. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, wherein the rod of aerosol-generating substrate comprises an aerosol former having a glycerine content of at least about 10 percent by weight.
25. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, wherein the embossed portion of the paper wrapper directly circumscribes the rod of aerosol-generating substrate.
26. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, wherein the embossed portion of the paper wrapper circumscribes the rod of aerosol-generating substrate along at least 90 percent of a length of the rod.
27. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, wherein the embossed portion of the paper wrapper circumscribes the rod of aerosol-generating substrate along 100 percent of a length of the rod.
28. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, wherein the embossed portion of the paper wrapper has a bending moment of from 3 centinewton centimeters to 8 centinewton centimeters at 90 degrees.
29. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, wherein the embossed portion of the paper wrapper has a bending moment of from 4 centinewton centimeters to 7 centinewton centimeters at 90 degrees.
30. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, wherein the embossed portion of the paper wrapper has a bending moment of from 5 centinewton centimeters to 6 centinewton centimeters at 90 degrees.
31. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, wherein the rod of aerosol-generating substrate comprises a gel composition.
32. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, further comprising an elongate susceptor element extending in a longitudinal direction through the rod of aerosol-generating substrate.
33. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, further comprising an upstream element provided upstream of the rod of aerosol-generating substrate and abutting an upstream end of the rod of aerosol-generating substrate.
34. The aerosol-generating article according to claim 16, further comprising a downstream section arranged downstream of the rod of aerosol-generating substrate and in axial alignment with the rod of aerosol-generating substrate, the downstream section comprising one or more downstream elements.
35. A method of producing an aerosol-generating article, the method comprising: providing a rod of aerosol-generating substrate; providing a paper wrapper having a basis weight of from 50 grams per square meter to 100 grams per square meter; embossing a portion of the paper wrapper; and wrapping the paper wrapper around the aerosol-generating article, such that the embossed portion circumscribes at least the rod of aerosol-generating substrate along at least percent of a length of the rod.
Description
[0272]
[0273]
[0274]
[0275]
[0276]
[0277]
[0278]
[0279]
[0280]
[0281] Embodiments of the invention will now be described in detail, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0282]
[0283] The aerosol-generating article has an overall length of about 45 millimetres.
[0284] The downstream section 114 comprises a tubular element 100 located immediately downstream of the rod 111 of aerosol-generating substrate 112, the tubular element 100 being in longitudinal alignment with the rod 111 of aerosol-generating substrate 112. In the embodiment of
[0285] The rod 111 comprises an aerosol-generating substrate 112 comprising a porous medium loaded with a gel composition as defined above. An example of a suitable gel composition is shown below in Table 1:
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Gel composition Component Amount (% by weight) Water 20 Glycerol 73.5 Nicotine 1.5 Gelling agent 3 Lactic acid 1 Divalent cations 1
[0286] In addition, the downstream section 114 comprises a mouthpiece element 42 at a location downstream of the tubular element 100. In more detail, the mouthpiece element 42 is positioned immediately downstream of the tubular element 100. As shown in
[0287] The mouthpiece element 42 is provided in the form of a cylindrical plug of low-density cellulose acetate. The mouthpiece element 42 has a length of about 12 millimetres and an external diameter of about 7.25 millimetres. The RTD of the mouthpiece element 42 is about 12 millimetres H2O.
[0288] The aerosol-generating article 1 comprises a ventilation zone 60 provided at a location along the tubular element 100. In more detail, the ventilation zone is provided at about 4 millimetres from the downstream end of the tubular element 100. A ventilation level of the aerosol-generating article 1 is about 40 percent.
[0289] The rod 111 comprises an aerosol-generating substrate 112 of one of the types described above. The aerosol-generating substrate 112 may substantially define the structure and dimensions of the rod 111. The rod 111 comprising the aerosol-generating substrate has an external diameter of about 7.25 millimetres and a length of about 12 millimetres.
[0290] The aerosol-generating article 1 further comprises a high basis weight wrapper 10 with an embossed portion 113 circumscribing the rod 111 of aerosol-generating substrate 112. In the embodiment of
[0291] In this embodiment, the high basis weight wrapper 10 extends along the full length of the aerosol-generating article 1, from an upstream end 18 to a downstream end 20. The high basis weight wrapper 10 fully circumscribes the upstream element 46, the rod 111 of aerosol-generating substrate 112, the tubular element 100 and the mouthpiece 42 around their circumferences. The high basis weight wrapper 10 defines an outer surface of the aerosol-generating article 1.
[0292] The high basis weight wrapper 10 further comprises a layer of adhesive 115 on the inner surface of the wrapper 10. The representation of the layer of adhesive 115 in
[0293] The representation of the embossed portion 113 in
[0294] The rod 111 of aerosol-generating substrate 112 also comprises an elongate susceptor element 44 within the aerosol-generating substrate 112. In more detail, the susceptor element 44 is arranged substantially longitudinally within the aerosol-generating substrate 112, such as to be approximately parallel to the longitudinal direction of the rod 111. As shown in the drawing of
[0295] The susceptor element 44 extends all the way from an upstream end to a downstream end of the rod 111. In effect, the susceptor element 44 has substantially the same length as the rod 111 comprising the aerosol-generating substrate 112.
[0296] In the embodiment of
[0297] The upstream section 16 comprises an upstream element 46 located immediately upstream of the rod 111 of aerosol-generating substrate 112, the upstream element 46 being in longitudinal alignment with the rod 111 of aerosol-generating substrate 112. In the embodiment of
[0298] The upstream element 46 is provided in the form of a cylindrical plug of cellulose acetate circumscribed by a stiff wrapper 10. The upstream element 46 has a length of about 5 millimetres. The RTD of the upstream element 46 is about 30 millimetres H2O.
[0299] The tubular element 100 comprises a tubular body 103 defining a cavity 106 extending from a first end 101 of the tubular body 103 to a second end 102 of the tubular body 103. The tubular element 100 also comprises a folded end portion forming a first end wall 104 at the first end 101 of the tubular body 103. The first end wall 104 delimits and opening 105, which permits airflow between the cavity 106 and the exterior of the tubular element 100. In particular, the embodiment of
[0300] The cavity 106 of the tubular body 103 is substantially empty, and so substantially unrestricted airflow is enabled along the cavity 106. Consequently, the RTD of the tubular element 100 can be localised at a specific longitudinal position of the tubular element 100namely, at the first end wall 104and can be controlled through the chosen configuration of the first end wall 104 and its corresponding opening 105. In the embodiment of
[0301] As shown in
[0302] The combination of the first end wall 104 and its corresponding opening 105 provide an effective barrier arrangement which may restrict movement of the aerosol-generating substrate, whilst also enabling one or both of air and aerosol to flow from the rod 111 of aerosol-generating substrate 112 and through the opening 105 into the cavity 106. The opening 105 is generally aligned with the radially central position of the susceptor element 44 of the rod 111 of aerosol-generating substrate 112. This may be advantageous as it helps to keep a distance between the first end wall 105 and the susceptor, and thus mitigate undesirable heating of the first end wall 105. This may also be advantageous as it can provide direct unimpeded downstream flow of aerosol produced by the portion of the aerosol-generating substrate in close proximity to the susceptor element 44.
[0303] The first end wall 104 is formed by folding an end portion of the tubular element 100 about a fold point. The fold point generally corresponds to the first end of the tubular body 103 of the tubular element 100.
[0304]
[0305] The first hollow acetate tube 280 and the second hollow acetate tube 290 define a tubular body 203 with a cavity 206 extending from a first upstream end 201 of the tubular body 203 to a second downstream end 202 of the tubular body 203.
[0306] The first hollow acetate tube 280 defines a support element. The first upstream end of the first hollow acetate tube abuts the downstream end of the rod 211 of aerosol-generating substrate 212.
[0307] The second hollow acetate tube 290 defines an aerosol-cooling element which abuts the downstream end of the first hollow acetate tube 280.
[0308] The internal cavity 206 of the tubular body 203 defined by the first hollow acetate tube 280 and the second hollow acetate tube 290 is substantially empty, and so substantially unrestricted airflow is enabled along the cavity 206.
[0309] As a whole, the tubular body 203 does not substantially contribute to the overall RTD of the aerosol-generating article. An RTD of the tubular body 203 as a whole is substantially 0 millimetres H2O.
[0310] The first hollow acetate tube 280 has a length of about 8 millimetres, an external diameter of about 7.25 millimetres, and an internal diameter (D.sub.FTS) of about 1.9 millimetres. Thus, a thickness of a peripheral wall of the first hollow acetate tube 280 is about 2.67 millimetres.
[0311] The second hollow acetate tube 290 has a length of about 8 millimetres, an external diameter of about 7.25 millimetres, and an internal diameter (D.sub.STS) of about 3.25 millimetres. Thus, a thickness of a peripheral wall of the second hollow acetate tube 290 is about 2 millimetres. Thus, a ratio between the internal diameter (D.sub.FTS) of the first hollow acetate tube 280 and the internal diameter (D.sub.STS) of the second hollow acetate tube 290 is about 0.75.
[0312] The aerosol-generating article 2 comprises a ventilation zone 60 provided at a location along the second hollow acetate tube 290. In more detail, the ventilation zone is provided at about 2 millimetres from the upstream end of the second hollow acetate tube 290. A ventilation level of the aerosol-generating article 2 is about 25 percent.
[0313] The aerosol-generating article 2 may further comprise a high basis weight wrapper 10 with an embossed portion 13 circumscribing the rod 211 of aerosol-generating substrate 212. In this embodiment of
[0314] In this embodiment, the high basis weight wrapper 10 extends along the full length of the aerosol-generating article 2, from an upstream end 18 to a downstream end 20. The high basis weight wrapper 10 fully circumscribes the upstream element 46, the rod 211 of aerosol-generating substrate 212, the first hollow acetate tube 280, the second hollow acetate tube 290 and the mouthpiece 42 around their circumferences. The high basis weight wrapper 10 defines an outer surface of the aerosol-generating article 2.
[0315] The representation of the embossed portion 213 in
[0316]
[0317] The aerosol-generating article 3 of the third embodiment has a hollow acetate tube 380 substantially the same as the first hollow acetate tube 280 of the aerosol-generating article 2 of the second embodiment. This hollow acetate tube 380 defines a support element and has a cavity 306 extending from an upstream end of the of the hollow acetate tube 380 to a downstream end of the hollow acetate tube 380.
[0318] The cavity 306 of the hollow acetate tube 380 is substantially empty, and so substantially unrestricted airflow is enabled along the cavity 306.
[0319] The hollow acetate tube 380 does not substantially contribute to the overall RTD of the aerosol-generating article. An RTD of the intermediate hollow section 250 as a whole is substantially 0 millimetres H2O.
[0320] The aerosol-generating article 3 of the third embodiment comprises an aerosol-cooling element 370 located immediately downstream of the hollow acetate tube 380, the aerosol-cooling element 370 being in longitudinal alignment with the rod 311 of aerosol-generating substrate 312 and the hollow acetate tube 380. In more detail, the upstream end of the aerosol-cooling element 370 abuts the downstream end of the hollow acetate tube 380.
[0321] In contrast to the aerosol cooling element (hollow acetate tube 290) of the aerosol-generating device 2 of the second embodiment, the aerosol-cooling element 370 comprises a plurality of longitudinally extending channels which offer a low or substantially null resistance to the passage of air through the rod. In more detail, the aerosol-cooling element 370 is formed from a preferably non-porous sheet material selected from the group comprising a metallic foil, a polymeric sheet, and a substantially non-porous paper or cardboard. In particular, in the embodiment illustrated in
[0322] The aerosol-generating article 3 may further comprise a high basis weight wrapper 10 with an embossed portion 313 circumscribing the rod 311 of aerosol-generating substrate 312. In this embodiment of
[0323] In this embodiment, the high basis weight paper wrapper 10 extends along the full length of the aerosol-generating article 3, from an upstream end 18 to a downstream end 20. The paper wrapper 10 fully circumscribes the rod 311 of aerosol-generating substrate 312, the hollow acetate tube 380, the aerosol-cooling element 370 and the mouthpiece 42 around their circumferences. The high basis weight paper wrapper 10 defines an outer surface of the aerosol-generating article 3.
[0324] The representation of the embossed portion 313 in
[0325]
[0326] Experimental tests were carried out by the inventors to test the manufacturing capabilities of different aerosol-generating article wrappers, including aerosol-generating article wrappers in accordance with the present invention. These tests were aimed at determining the aerosol-generating article manufacturing speeds that could be achieved with wrappers having different properties. The tests focused primarily on comparing conventional wrappers for aerosol-generating articles known in the art with higher basis weight wrappers. However, other parameters of the wrappers were assessed throughout the tests.
[0327] The wrappers tested were paper wrappers in the form of rectangular sheets of paper with an inner surface and an outer surface. The wrappers tested had two transverse edges in the direction of rolling of the wrapper and two longitudinal edges in a direction perpendicular to the direction of rolling of the wrapper. The wrapper was wrapped around the entire circumference of the aerosol-generating article. The width of the wrappers tested was greater than the circumference of the aerosol-generating articles such that the two longitudinal edges of the wrappers overlapped when the wrappers were wrapped around the articles.
[0328] During the manufacturing process tested, each wrapper was wrapped around two identical portions of two separate aerosol-generating articles which were joined together. The two portions of aerosol-generating article remained joined together for the tested manufacturing process. The two portions of aerosol-generating article, once wrapped in the wrapper, are known as a double stick. As illustrated by
[0329] The two joined portions of the double stick can be separated from one another in a further manufacturing process in which the double stick is cut in half along cut line 675, through the rod of aerosol-generating substrate. Each resulting portion of aerosol-generating article has a mouthpiece element, an intermediate hollow section and a shorter rod of aerosol-generating substrate. The experimental tests described herein focus the production speed of double sticks achieved for each wrapper tested. All parameters from the experimental data relate to a double stick. In other words, the mass of glue and the manufacturing speeds refer respectively to the mass of glue used for a double stick and the number of double sticks produced per minute.
[0330] A number of other parameters for the wrapper were varied to assess their effects on manufacturing speeds. These other parameters included the embossment or not of the wrapper along its entire surface and the amount of glue applied to the inner surface of the wrapper. The wrappers tested had either 5, 15 or 30 milligrams of glue per wrapper.
[0331] As illustrated by
[0332] As illustrated by
[0333] During the testing of the double sticks, minor defects, such as partial opening of the wrapper at the overlap, were classified as acceptable as they do not appreciably affect the manufacturing process. Defects classified as not acceptable were ones found to appreciably affect manufacturing of the double sticks. For example, if the opening at the overlap of the wrapper is too large, the machine can become jammed or glue can escape the wrapper and contaminate machinery.
[0334] The manufacturing speed shown in Tables 2 and 3 refer to the number of double sticks produced to a good quality with little to no defects. The tests also included an assessment of the defects present on the double sticks when the production speeds were 500 double sticks per minute higher than the highest acceptable production speed that yielded good quality double sticks. It should be noted that the manufacturing apparatus used to conduct the tests had an inherent maximum manufacturing speed of 5000 double sticks per minute.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comparison of the manufacturing speeds of wrappers having different parameters Basis weight Glue Manufacturing Test of the paper (milligrams speed achieved sample (grams per Embossed per double (double sticks No. square meter) (Y/N) stick) per minute) 1 45 N 5 4500 2 78 N 5 0 3 78 N 15 1500 4 78 Y 15 2500 5 78 Y 30 4000
[0335] In a first experiment, for which the results are summarised in Table 2, a double stick with a conventional wrapper for an aerosol-generating article was compared with double sticks having higher grammage wrappers with a basis weight of 78 grams per square meter.
[0336] Test sample 1 had a conventional wrapper with a basis weight of 45 grams per square meter with no embossing and 5 milligrams of glue per article. Test sample 1 achieved a manufacturing speed of 4500 double sticks per minute although there was not a significant increase in the number of defects observed when the speed was increased to 5000 double sticks per minute.
[0337] Test sample 2 had a high grammage wrapper, with a high basis weight of 78 grams per square meter with no embossing and 5 milligrams of glue per article. Test sample 2 did not achieve any good quality double sticks at any speed of manufacturing. With the higher basis weight paper used for this test, the wrapper did not adhere to itself at its overlapping portion resulting in an unusable product. This was due to high bending moment required to roll the wrapper and the high spring back effect of the wrapper once rolled. This test sample highlighted the need to modify the higher basis weight wrapper in some way to overcome the high bending moment required to roll the wrapper and the high spring back effect of the wrapper once rolled.
[0338] Test sample 3 had an identical wrapper to Test sample 2 with the exception of 15 milligrams of glue being applied instead of 5 milligrams, and the glue being applied evenly across substantially the entire inner surface of the wrapper, as illustrated by
[0339] Test sample 4 had an identical wrapper to that of Test sample 3 with the exception of the wrapper of Test sample 4 being an embossed wrapper. This test sample achieved manufacturing speeds of 2500 good quality double sticks per minute. This test sample clearly shows that the embossment of the wrapper has a positive effect on the manufacturing speeds that can be achieved. Even when manufacturing speeds were increased by 500 double sticks per minute, only minor defects were observed, with such minor defects not being considered sufficient to have a discernible effect on the finished aerosol-generating articles.
[0340] Test sample 5 had an identical wrapper to that of Test sample 4 with the exception that: for the wrapper of Test sample 5, the amount of glue applied to the inner surface of the wrapper was further increased to 30 milligrams per wrapper. A further increase in the manufacturing speeds achieved was observed, up to 4000 good quality double sticks per minute. Even when manufacturing speeds were increased by 500 double sticks per minute, only minor defects were observed, with such minor defects not being considered sufficient to have a discernible effect on the finished aerosol-generating articles.
[0341] Four further test samples, not shown in Table 2 were tested. These four further samples all had paper wrappers with a basis weight of 45 grams per square meter. Two of these four further test samples had an embossed wrapper, one with 15 milligrams of glue per double stick, the other with 30 milligrams of glue per double stick. The paper wrappers of the remaining two further test samples were not embossed, and one had 15 milligrams of glue per double stick, whilst the other had 30 milligrams of glue per double stick. All of the four further test samples achieved the maximum manufacturing speed of the machine of 5000 double sticks per minute with little to no defects.
[0342] The data collected in Table 2 clearly shows the positive effect on the manufacturing speed and quality of the double sticks resulting from both: a) the increase in glue applied to the inner surface of a higher basis weight wrapper; and b) the embossing of the wrapper. It was noted that the most common double stick defect observed was the unsticking of the wrapper around the central rod of aerosol-generating substrate. This could be explained by the fact that the aerosol-generating substrate is a softer material than the mouthpiece sections and the intermediate hollow sections of the double sticks. More specifically, the aerosol-generating substrate provides a lower resistance than the other components to the rolling pressure applied during the rolling of the wrapper around these components. As a result, the wrapper requires a higher force to be applied to assemble the wrapper around the substrate. Consequently, the embossing of the wrapper and increased amount of glue are particularly effective when these circumscribe the rod of aerosol-generating substrate.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Comparison of the manufacturing speeds of 65 grams per square meter wrappers having different parameters Basis weight Glue Manufacturing Test of the paper (milligrams speed achieved sample (grams per Embossed per double (double sticks No. square meter) (Y/N) stick) per minute) 1 45 N 5 4500 6 65 N 15 1500 7 65 Y 15 2500 8 65 N 30 3000 9 65 Y 30 4000
[0343] In a second experiment, Test Sample 1 was compared with further test samples 6 to 9, each of which had a paper wrapper with a basis weight of 65 grams per square meter. The results of the second experiment are shown in Table 3.
[0344] Test sample 6 had an unembossed high grammage wrapper with a basis weight of 65 grams per square meter and 15 milligrams of glue applied to an inner surface. Test samples with this configuration achieved manufacturing speeds of 1500 good quality double sticks per minute. With a slight increase in speed of 500 double sticks per minute, significant defects were observed in the double sticks, rendering them unusable.
[0345] Test sample 7 had an identical wrapper to that of Test sample 6 with the exception of the wrapper of Test sample 7 being an embossed wrapper. This resulted in an increase in the manufacturing speeds up to 2500 good quality double sticks per minute. With this configuration, when the manufacturing speeds were increased by 500 double sticks per minute, only minor defects were observed that did not affect the manufacturing process. Once again, this highlights the advantageous manufacturing effect resulting from embossing the high basis weight wrapper.
[0346] The wrapper of Test sample 8 was the same as that of Test sample 6 with the exception of the amount of glue being applied to the inner surface of the wrapper being increased to 30 milligrams per square meter. Test sample 8 achieved manufacturing speeds of 3000 good quality double sticks per minute. When the manufacturing speeds were increased by 500 double sticks per minute, only minor defects were observed that did not affect the manufacturing process. This further shows the advantageous effects of the increasing the amount of glue applied to the inner surface of the wrapper and how this can have a beneficial effect on the manufacturing of high basis weight wrappers.
[0347] The wrapper of Test sample 9 was the same as that of Test sample 8 with the exception of the wrapper of Test sample 9 being an embossed wrapper. In this configuration manufacturing speeds of 4000 good quality double sticks per minute were achieved. When the manufacturing speeds were increased by 500 double sticks per minute, only very minor defects were observed in the double sticks and these did not negatively impact manufacturing.
[0348] It is clear from the data shown in Tables 2 and 3 that both the embossment of a wrapper and the application of a high amount of glue to substantially the entire inner surface of the wrapper have advantageous effects on the manufacturing speeds that can be achieved for a high basis weight wrapper.
[0349] The combination of an embossed wrapper and a high amount of glue achieved the best results for both grammages of wrapper tested. This combination of parameters most closely match the manufacturing speeds seen with a conventional wrapper with the added benefits of the higher basis weight wrapper as discussed in more detail above.
[0350]
[0351] In this embodiment, the wrapper 910 circumscribes the upstream element 46, the rod 911 of aerosol-generating substrate 912, and the tubular body 903 defined by a first hollow acetate tube 980 and a second hollow acetate tube 990. The wrapper 910 does not circumscribe the mouthpiece element 42.
[0352] In the embodiment of
[0353] The aerosol-generating article 9 further comprises a tipping wrapper 919 circumscribing the mouthpiece element 42 and the second hollow acetate tube 990. The tipping wrapper 919 is wrapped around the mouthpiece element 42 and an outer surface of a portion of the wrapper 910 circumscribing the second hollow acetate tube.