REDUCTION OF ARTEFACTS IN A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
20230410264 ยท 2023-12-21
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method and a cone beam computed tomography apparatus for reducing artefacts in an image acquired with the cone beam computed tomography apparatus using a second pass artefact reduction method. Projection data of an object are acquired, wherein the projection data comprises a first subset of data to be used for reconstruction of a first image, and a second subset of data comprising projection data not to be used for the construction of the first image, wherein the second subset of data comprises projection data not comprised in the first subset of data. A first and a second image are reconstructed using the first and the second subset of data, respectively. A second pass artefact reduction method is performed using the second image as input image of the second pass artefact reduction method, thereby reducing artefacts in the first image.
Claims
1. A method for reducing artefacts in a cone beam computed tomography, the method comprising: acquiring projection data of an object to be imaged, wherein the projection data comprises a first subset of data to be used for reconstruction of a first image, and a second subset of data comprising projection data not to be used for the construction of the first image, wherein the second subset of data comprises projection data not comprised in the first subset of data; reconstructing a first image comprising a first resolution using the first subset of data of the projection data; reconstructing a second image comprising a second resolution lower than the first resolution of the first image using the second subset of data of the projection data; and performing a second pass artefact reduction using the second image as input image of the second pass artefact reduction such that artefacts in the first image are reduced.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second subset of data comprises projection data from a region of the object that is not comprised in the first subset of data, or wherein the second subset of data comprises projection data of the object from a projection direction not comprised in the first subset of data.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second pass artefact reduction comprises: determining an artefact-inducing structure in the input image; forward-projecting the artefact-inducing structure into forward projection data; reconstructing an artefact image using the forward projection data; combining the artefact image with a low pass filtered image of the artefact-inducing structure thereby generating a correction image; and combining the correction image with the first image thereby reducing artefacts in the first image.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the artefact-inducing structure comprises a high absorption density gradient in a direction parallel to a rotation axis of a computed tomography apparatus.
5. The method according to claim 3, wherein the second pass artefact reduction comprises up-sampling the correction image to a resolution equal to the first resolution of the first image.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second subset of data comprises data acquired in a second scan prior to a brain perfusion scan, or wherein the second subset of data comprises data acquired due to cardiac phase tolerances in a gated cardiac scan.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the second scan is a helical scan.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein a second image contrast of the second image is adjusted to match a first image contrast of the first image.
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second image is registered to the first image.
10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second image is low-pass filtered.
11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the reconstruction of the first image and/or the reconstruction of the second image comprises a frequency split.
12. A computed tomography apparatus for reducing cone beam artefacts in an image using a second pass artefact reduction, the apparatus comprising an acquisition unit configured for acquiring projection data of an object to be imaged, wherein the projection data comprises a first subset of data to be used for reconstruction of a first image, and a second subset of data comprising projection data not to be used for the construction of the first image, wherein the second subset of data comprises projection data not comprised in the first subset of data; and a processor configured for reconstructing a first image comprising a first resolution using the first subset of data of the projection data, wherein the processor is configured for reconstructing a second image comprising a second resolution lower than the first resolution of the first image using the second subset of data of the projection data, and configured for performing the second pass artefact reduction method using the second image as input image of the second pass artefact reduction method, thereby reducing artefacts in the first image.
13. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the processor is further configured to determine an artefact-inducing structure in the input image, to forward-project the artefact-inducing structure into forward projection data, reconstruct an artefact image using the forward projection data, combine the artefact image with a low pass filtered image of the artefact-inducing structure thereby generating a correction image, and combine the correction image with the first image thereby reducing artefacts in the first image.
14. (canceled)
15. (canceled)
16. A non-transitory computer-readable medium for storing executable instructions, which cause a method to be performed for reducing artefacts in a cone beam computed tomography, the method comprising: acquiring projection data of an object to be imaged, wherein the projection data comprises a first subset of data to be used for reconstruction of a first image, and a second subset of data comprising projection data not to be used for the construction of the first image, wherein the second subset of data comprises projection data not comprised in the first subset of data; reconstructing a first image comprising a first resolution using the first subset of data of the projection data; reconstructing a second image comprising a second resolution lower than the first resolution of the first image using the second subset of data of the projection data; and performing a second pass artefact reduction using the second image as input image of the second pass artefact reduction such that artefacts in the first image are reduced.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056] Provided a perfusion scan protocol that involves a time series of axial scans (perfusion scan) plus, ideally, one scan covering a larger region including the region for the perfusion scan (native scan), the method comprises: A registration method to register the volume image of the native scan to each of the volume images of the time series produced in the perfusion scan. If the native scan was performed at different tube settings (kVp), the image contrast needs to be adjusted to match the contrast of the perfusion scans. This can be easily done if the native scan is a dual energy scan. Usage of the registration parameters to determine the relative system-to-patient configuration. Given a relative system-to-patient configuration, any method to estimate cone-beam artefacts (residual image) for an axial cone-beam CT acquisition is performed, e.g. the second pass method described above. This is preferably done using the native scan volume. For this purpose, the native scan volume is warped onto the perfusion scan volume.
[0057] Further modifications/improvements: [0058] 1. In order to reduce computational burden, the artefacts are only estimated once for a specific system to patient configuration and the residual image is applied to all volumes of the perfusion scan time series. [0059] 2. If registration of the native scan is performed with respect to each image in the time series, the system-to-patient configuration can be tracked. This can be used to [0060] a. e.g. use a mean of registration parameters to estimate a mean system to patient configuration for the estimation of the residual image. [0061] b. to perform a number of residual image estimations as needed for significantly different system to patient configurations. [0062] i. this can include some measure for significance [0063] ii. plus possibly a clustering of deviations of system to patient configurations This may result in a number of residual images to be estimated smaller than the number of images in the time series from the perfusion scan. [0064] c. correct registration of the residual image to each of the perfusion scan images in case of slight variations. [0065] 3. This method may or may not be performed using either the native scan image, a single or multiple images from the time series, the native scan promising best results. A different method for producing the correction image can be realized in the frequency domain without an explicit forward- and back projection procedure. [0066] The second image is transformed into the frequency domain (FFT) [0067] From the projection geometry and using the Fourier slice theorem a region in the Fourier domain is identified that contains the missing data, which has effectively not been measured during acquisition of the first image. [0068] From this missing data, the correction image can be obtained by inverse FFT. [0069] The region can be spatially varying, depending on the position in the image relative to the system geometry. Thus multiple inverse FFTs may need to be performed for different positions within or regions of the image.
[0070] In case one or both scans are spectral scans, the correction can be performed independently using the corresponding material basis image, using the same registration parameters, e.g. taken from registering the combined (conventional) or some basis material image. In case of spectral image acquisitions, mismatches between the images in terms of contrast (different keV setting, contrast medium present or not present), specific reconstructions, possibly differing from the diagnostic images, can be used for registration. One specific example: First and second scan may possibly be done at different keVs, a perfusion scan typically done at 80 keV (first scan), a typical native or CTA scan done at 120 keV (second scan). The keV mismatch results in different contrast levels in the images and may deteriorate registration results. In case, however, the second scan is a spectral scan, a virtually conventional image at the keV of the first scan can be reconstructed and used for registration instead of the diagnostic image. Another possibility could be to use a virtual non-contrast image in case the second scan is a CTA scan. Thus, a conventional image based on a kVp switching dual energy acquisition can be generated. This is based on an intermediate material decomposition followed by a re-composition at the desired conventional tube spectrum. The presence of a conventional image will improve customer acceptance of the dual energy acquisition protocol.
[0071] While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive. The invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. Other variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing a claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the dependent claims.
[0072] In the claims, the word comprising does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article a or an does not exclude a plurality. The mere fact that certain measures are re-cited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope.
LIST OF REFERENCE SIGNS
[0073] 100 cone beam computed tomography apparatus [0074] 110 acquisition unit [0075] 111 first subset of data [0076] 112 second subset of data [0077] 113 first image [0078] 114 second image [0079] 120 processing unit