HYDROPHILIC FILTRATION DURING MANUFACTURE OF VACCINE ADJUVANTS

Abstract

An improved method for the manufacture of an oil-in-water emulsion involves three procedures: (i) preparation of a preliminary emulsion; (ii) micro fluidization of the preliminary emulsion to reduce its droplet size; and (iii) filtration of the microfluidized emulsion through a hydrophilic membrane. The emulsions are useful as vaccine adjuvants.

Claims

1-3. (canceled)

4. A method for the manufacture of a squalene-containing oil-in-water emulsion, comprising the steps of: (i) forming a first emulsion having a first average oil droplet size; (ii) microfluidizing the first emulsion to form a second emulsion having a second average oil droplet size which is less than the first average oil droplet size; (iii) prefiltering the second emulsion through a first hydrophilic polyethersulfone membrane; and (iv) filtering the second emulsion using a second hydrophilic polyethersulfone membrane.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the first average oil droplet size is 5000 nm or less.

6. The method according to claim 4 or claim 5, wherein the number of oil droplets having a size of >1.2 m in the first emulsion is 510.sup.11/ml or less.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the second average oil droplet size is 500 nm or less.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the number of oil droplets having a size of >1.2 m in the second emulsion is 510.sup.10/ml or less.

9. A method for manufacture of a squalene-containing oil-in-water emulsion, comprising the steps of: (i) forming a squalene-containing emulsion having an average oil droplet size of 500 nm or less; (ii) filtering the squalene-containing emulsion using a hydrophilic polyethersulfone filter which has a first membrane layer with larger pores and a second membrane layer with smaller pores.

10. The method according to claims 4 or 9, wherein the average oil droplet size after filtration is less than 220 nm.

11. The method according to claims 4 or 9, wherein the number of oil droplets having a size of >1.2 m after filtration is 510.sup.8/ml or less.

12.-14. (canceled)

15. The method according to claims 4 or 9, wherein the filtration membrane is asymmetric and/or porous.

16. The method according to claims 4 or 9, wherein the filtration membrane, and optionally the prefiltration membrane, comprises a polymeric support material.

17. The method according to claims 4 or 9, wherein (i) the first membrane has a pore size 0.3 m, and/or (ii) the second membrane has a pore size <0.3 m.

18. A method for preparing a vaccine composition, comprising preparing an emulsion according to claims 4 or 9, preparing an emulsion adjuvant comprising the emulsion, and combining the emulsion adjuvant with an antigen.

19. A method for preparing a vaccine kit comprising preparing an emulsion according to claims 4 or 9, preparing an emulsion adjuvant comprising the emulsion, and packaging the emulsion adjuvant into a kit as a kit component together with an antigen component.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the kit components are in separate vials.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein the vials are made from borosilicate glass.

22. The method of claim 18, wherein the emulsion adjuvant is a bulk adjuvant and the method comprises extracting unit doses from the bulk adjuvant for packaging as kit components.

23. The method of claim 18, wherein the antigen is an influenza virus antigen.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the combination of the emulsion and the antigen forms a vaccine composition and wherein the vaccine composition includes about 15 g, about 10 g, about 7.5 g, about 5 g, about 3.8 g, about 3.75 g, about 1.9 g, or about 1.5 g of hemagglutinin per influenza virus strain.

25. The method of claim 23, wherein the combination of the emulsion and the antigen forms a vaccine composition and wherein the vaccine composition includes a thiomersal or 2-phenoxyethanol preservative.

26. A method for the manufacture of a squalene-containing oil-in-water emulsion, comprising the steps of: (i) forming a first emulsion having a first average oil droplet size; (ii) microfluidizing the first emulsion to form a second emulsion having a second average oil droplet size which is less than the first average oil droplet size; and (iii) filtering the second emulsion through a hydrophilic double-layer filter, wherein the double-layer filter comprises a first hydrophilic polyethersulfone membrane layer with larger pores and a second hydrophilic polyethersulfone membrane layer with smaller pores.

27. (canceled)

28. The method of claim 4, wherein the prefiltration and filtration steps are carried out using a double-layer filter.

29. The method according to claims 4 or 9, wherein the prefiltration membrane is asymmetric and/or porous.

30. The method of claim 9, wherein the filtration is carried out using a double-layer filter.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0195] FIG. 1 shows a specific example of a homogenizer that can be used to form a first emulsion.

[0196] FIG. 2 shows detail of a rotor and stator that can be used in such a homogenizer.

[0197] FIG. 3A shows a pressure profile for a synchronous intensifier pump mode wherein the pressure is substantially constant for at least 85% of the time.

[0198] FIG. 3B shows a pressure profile for a synchronous intensifier pump mode wherein the pressure continuously remains constant.

[0199] FIG. 3 shows a Z-type channel interaction chamber.

[0200] FIG. 4 shows a type I circulation, whereas FIG. 5 shows a type II circulation. Containers are labeled as C whereas a homogenizer is labeled as H. Direction and order of fluid movements are shown.

[0201] FIG. 6 the homogenizer has two input arrows and two output arrows but in reality the homogenizer has a single input channel and a single output channel.

MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Example 1

[0202] A microfluidized emulsion comprising squalene, polysorbate 80, sorbitan trioleate and sodium citrate buffer was prepared according to the present invention. The emulsion was microfluidized until it had an average oil droplet size of 165 nm or less and a number of oil droplets having a size >1.2 m of 510.sup.8/ml or less.

[0203] The emulsion was filtered through a sterilizing grade filter cartridge (filter A) having a prefilter membrane of hydrophilic asymmetric porous polyethersulfone having a pore size of 0.45 m and an endfilter membrane of hydrophilic asymmetric porous polyethersulfone having a pore size of 0.2 m. During filtration, the emulsion was maintained at a temperature of 405 C.

[0204] The above process was carried out for four separate runs and the characteristics of the filtered emulsions were measured and are shown in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Actual Value Test parameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Average oil droplet size 148 144 144 150 Number of oil droplets 0.08 10.sup.6 0.08 10.sup.6 0.12 10.sup.6 0.20 10.sup.6 having a size >1.2 m

[0205] As shown in Table 1, filter A consistently reduced the average size of the oil droplets in the emulsion. Furthermore, filter A consistently reduced the number of oil droplets having a size >1.2 m in the emulsion by approximately 10.sup.3 fold.

Example 2

[0206] The same microfluidized emulsion as used for example 1 was filtered through a different sterilizing grade filter cartridge (filter B). Filter B had a prefilter membrane of hydrophilic asymmetric porous polyethersulfone and an endfilter membrane of hydrophilic asymmetric porous polyethersulfone having a pore size of 0.2 m. During filtration, the emulsion was maintained at a temperature of 405 C. This process was carried out for four separate runs and the characteristics of the filtered emulsions were measured and are shown in Table 2.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Measured value Test parameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Average oil droplet size 142 143 141 141 Number of oil droplets 0.23 10.sup.6 0.15 10.sup.6 0.20 10.sup.6 0.23 10.sup.6 having a size >1.2 m

[0207] As shown in Table 2, filter B consistently reduced the average size of the oil droplets in the emulsion. Furthermore, filter B consistently reduced the number of oil droplets having a size >1.2 m in the emulsion by approximately 10.sup.3 fold.

[0208] From examples 1 and 2, it can be seen that filter B results in a slightly lower oil droplet size but a slightly greater number of oil droplets having a size greater than 1.2 m. However, both filters A and B showed excellent results.

Example 3

[0209] The same microfluidized emulsion as used for example 1 was filtered through another different sterilizing grade filter cartridge (filter C). Filter C had a prefilter membrane of hydrophilic asymmetric porous polyethersulfone having a pore size of 0.45 m and an endfilter membrane of hydrophilic asymmetric porous polyethersulfone having a pore size of 0.2 m. During filtration, the emulsion was maintained at a temperature of 405 C.

[0210] In addition, the same microfluidized emulsion as used for example 1 was filtered through another different sterilizing grade filter cartridge (filter D). Filter D had a prefilter membrane of hydrophilic asymmetric porous polyethersulfone and an endfilter membrane of hydrophilic porous PVDF. During filtration, the emulsion was maintained at a temperature of 405 C.

[0211] Filter C showed excellent filtration results providing a filtered emulsion having an average oil droplet size of 15520 nm and a number of oil droplets having a size >1.2 m of 510.sup.6/ml or less. Although, filter D also provided a filtered emulsion meeting the above criteria, it was found to block more quickly, thus necessitating the replacement of the filter D membrane. Thus, all polyethersulfone filters were superior to this PVDF filter.

Example 4

[0212] Ten different hydrophilic membranes, from various manufacturers, were tested for filtering a microfluidized emulsion comprising squalene, polysorbate 80, sorbitan trioleate and sodium citrate buffer. The filters were numbered 1 to 10 as shown in Table 3 (NB: filter 1 is the same as filter C in Example 3 above; filter 2 is filter D; filter 9 is filter A; and filter 10 is filter B).

[0213] The yield of emulsion after filtration of 50 liters of emulsion was measured to determine if the filters were suitable for industrial-scale use. The % of input emulsion which was recovered after filtration was as follows:

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 % 50 16 8 8 8 13 4 82 88 89

[0214] A low recovery % indicates that the filter retains the emulsion, for instance because of blocking. It is clear that only filters 1, 8, 9 and 10 (i.e. filters A, B & C from above, plus one further filter which is similar to filter A but has a larger pore size in the first layer) gave yields of 50%, and that the yields that are most practicable for using at an industrial scale are filters 8-10. Filters 1, 8, 9 and 10 are all double-layer hydrophilic PES membranes, prepared by three different manufacturers. The first layers in these four membranes are either 0.45 m or 0.6 m and the second layer is 0.2 m. The best results were seen when at least one of the two layers was an asymmetric membrane.

[0215] It will be understood that the invention has been described by way of example only and modifications may be made whilst remaining within the scope and spirit of the invention.

REFERENCES

[0216] [1] WO90/14837. [0217] [2] Podda & Del Giudice (2003) Expert Rev Vaccines 2:197-203. [0218] [3] Podda (2001) Vaccine 19: 2673-2680. [0219] [4] Vaccine Design: The Subunit and Adjuvant Approach (eds. Powell & Newman) Plenum Press 1995 (ISBN 0-306-44867-X). [0220] [5] Vaccine Adjuvants: Preparation Methods and Research Protocols (Volume 42 of Methods in Molecular Medicine series). ISBN: 1-59259-083-7. Ed. O'Hagan. [0221] [6] New Generation Vaccines (eds. Levine et al.). 3rd edition, 2004. ISBN 0-8247-4071-8. [0222] [7] O'Hagan (2007) Expert Rev Vaccines 6(5):699-710. [0223] [8] EP-B-2029170 [0224] [9] Baudner et al. (2009) Pharm Res. 26(6):1477-85. [0225] [10] Dupuis et al. (1999) Vaccine 18:434-9. [0226] [11] Dupuis et al. (2001) Eur J Immunol 31:2910-8. [0227] [12] Burke et cd. (1994) J Infect Dis 170:1110-9. [0228] [13] Light Scattering from Polymer Solutions and Nanoparticle Dispersions (W. Schartl), 2007. ISBN: 978-3-540-71950-2. [0229] [14] Jafari et al (2008) Food Hydrocolloids 22:1191-1202 [0230] [15] WO90/04609. [0231] [16] U.S. Pat. No. 4,618,533 [0232] [17] U.S. Pat. No. 6,193,077 [0233] [18] U.S. Pat. No. 6,495,050 [0234] [19] Chen et al. (1999) Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 72:1699-1711. [0235] [20] U.S. Pat. No. 4,413,074 [0236] [21] U.S. Pat. No. 4,432,875 [0237] [22] U.S. Pat. No. 4,340,482 [0238] [23] U.S. Pat. No. 4,473,474 [0239] [24] U.S. Pat. No. 4,473,475 [0240] [25] U.S. Pat. No. 4,673,504 [0241] [26] EP-A-0221046. [0242] [27] U.S. Pat. No. 4,943,374 [0243] [28] U.S. Pat. No. 6,071,406 [0244] [29] U.S. Pat. No. 4,705,753 [0245] [30] U.S. Pat. No. 5,178,765 [0246] [31] U.S. Pat. No. 6,495,043 [0247] [32] U.S. Pat. No. 6,039,872 [0248] [33] U.S. Pat. No. 5,277,812 [0249] [34] U.S. Pat. No. 5,531,893. [0250] [35] U.S. Pat. No. 4,964,990 [0251] [36] Wavhal & Fisher (2002) Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 40:2473-88. [0252] [37] WO2006/044463. [0253] [38] Espinoza-Gmez et al. (2003) Revista de la Sociedad Quimica de Mxico 47:53-57. [0254] [39] Lidgate et al (1992) Pharmaceutical Research 9(7):860-863. [0255] [40] US-2007/0014805. [0256] [41] WO2007/080308. [0257] [42] WO2007/052155. [0258] [43] WO2005/089837. [0259] [44] U.S. Pat. No. 6,692,468. [0260] [45] WO00/07647. [0261] [46] WO99/17820. [0262] [47] U.S. Pat. No. 5,971,953. [0263] [48] U.S. Pat. No. 4,060,082. [0264] [49] EP-A-0520618. [0265] [50] WO98/01174. [0266] [51] Hoffmann et al. (2002) Vaccine 20:3165-3170. [0267] [52] Subbarao et al (2003) Virology 305:192-200. [0268] [53] Liu et al. (2003) Virology 314:580-590. [0269] [54] Ozaki et al (2004) J. Virol. 78:1851-1857. [0270] [55] Webby et al (2004) Lancet 363:1099-1103. [0271] [56] WO97/37000. [0272] [57] Brands et al. (1999) Dev Biol Stand 98:93-100. [0273] [58] Halperin et al. (2002) Vaccine 20:1240-7. [0274] [59] Tree et al. (2001) Vaccine 19:3444-50. [0275] [60] Kistner et al. (1998) Vaccine 16:960-8. [0276] [61] Kistner et al (1999) Dev Biol Stand 98:101-110. [0277] [62] Bruhl et al (2000) Vaccine 19:1149-58. [0278] [63] Pau et al. (2001) Vaccine 19:2716-21. [0279] [64] WO01/22992. [0280] [65] Hehme et al. (2004) Virus Res. 103(1-2):163-71. [0281] [66] Treanor et al. (1996) J Infect Dis 173:1467-70. [0282] [67] Keitel et al. (1996) Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 3:507-10. [0283] [68] Williamson et al. (2006) Infection and Immunity 74: 961-7. [0284] [69] Loukas et al. (2005) PLoS Med 2(10): e295. [0285] [70] EP-A-0139417. [0286] [71] Harper et al. (2004) Lancet 364(9447):1757-65. [0287] [72] J Toxicol Clin Toxicol (2001) 39:85-100. [0288] [73] Demicheli et al. (1998) Vaccine 16:880-884. [0289] [74] Stepanov et al. (1996) J Biotechnol 44:155-160. [0290] [75] Banzhoff (2000) Immunology Letters 71:91-96. [0291] [76] WO02/097072. [0292] [77] Greenbaum et al. (2004) Vaccine 22:2566-77. [0293] [78] Zurbriggen et al. (2003) Expert Rev Vaccines 2:295-304. [0294] [79] Piascik (2003) J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash D.C.). 43:728-30. [0295] [80] Mann et al. (2004) Vaccine 22:2425-9. [0296] [81] Halperin et al. (1979) Am J Public Health 69:1247-50. [0297] [82] Herbert et al. (1979) J Infect Dis 140:234-8. [0298] [83] Chen et al. (2003) Vaccine 21:2830-6.