Oxidized lipid detection
10948502 ยท 2021-03-16
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
G01N1/4044
PHYSICS
B03C1/005
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
G01N33/92
PHYSICS
B03C1/005
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The present invention is concerned with a method of extracting oxidized lipids from a lipid solution, the method comprising (a) a derivatisation step, comprising contacting a derivatisation agent with the lipid solution such that aldehydic oxidized lipids and/or ,-unsaturated oxidised lipids, if present in the lipid solution, are derivatised to include an anionic group, and (b) an oxidised lipid capture step, in which nanoparticles are contacted with the lipid solution, wherein the nanoparticles capture anionic-group containing oxidised lipids. The invention also includes a method of extracting aldehydic oxidized phospholipids from a lipid solution, the method comprising (a) a derivatisation step, comprising introduction of a anionic group to aldehydic oxidized lipids and/or ,-unsaturated oxidised lipids in the lipid solution, and (b) an oxidised lipid capture step, in which nanoparticles are contacted with the lipid solution, wherein the nanoparticles bind anionic-group containing oxidised lipids.
Claims
1. A method of extracting oxidised lipids from a lipid solution, the method comprising (a) a derivatisation step, comprising: (i) a reductive amination of aldehydic oxidised lipids present in the lipid solution, comprising contacting the lipid solution with a derivatisation agent selected from 2-aminoanthranilic acid (2AA), 4-aminoanthranilic acid (4AA), 3-(4-aminophenyl)-propionic acid (4APA) and 6-aminocaproic acid (6ACA), such that the aldehydic oxidised lipids present in the lipid solution are derivatised to include a carboxy group; or (ii) a hydrazone formation with aldehydic oxidised lipids and/or ,-unsaturated oxidised lipids present in the lipid solution, comprising contacting the lipid solution with a derivatisation agent that is a compound according to formula (I): ##STR00006## or a salt, solvate or hydrate thereof wherein: X represents a carboxy group each L independently represents a single bond or linker group n is an integer from 0 to 4, and A represents an optionally substituted heteroaryl or aryl group, such that the aldehydic oxidised lipids and/or ,-unsaturated oxidised lipids present in the lipid solution are derivatised to include a carboxy group; and (b) an oxidised lipid capture step, in which nanoparticles are contacted with the lipid solution, wherein the nanoparticles capture carboxy group containing oxidised lipids.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the nanoparticles comprise a metal oxide.
3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the nanoparticles comprise a magnetic core and a surface, and wherein the nanoparticles are functionalised such that the surface is electrophilic.
4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the magnetic core comprises iron oxide.
5. A method according to claim 3, wherein the magnetic core is surface functionalised such that the surface is hydrophilic; and/or the surface binds carboxy group containing oxidised lipids by an anion-exchange mechanism; and/or the surface comprises a polymer; and/or the surface comprises or consists of amines or polyetheramines.
6. A method according to claim 1, wherein for the reductive amination of (i), the aldehydic oxidised lipids present in the lipid solution are derivatised to include an aromatic group.
7. A method according to claim 1, wherein the derivatisation step comprises the hydrazone formation of (ii).
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the derivatisation agent is ##STR00007## or a salt, solvate or hydrate thereof.
9. A method according to claim 1, further comprising an initial step of lipid extraction, comprising extraction of the lipid solution from a biological sample.
10. A method according to claim 1, wherein in step (b) the nanoparticles are added to the lipid solution, and further comprising after step (b), (ci) an extraction step, comprising extraction of the nanoparticles from the lipid solution.
11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the nanoparticles are extracted from the lipid solution by centrifugation or by using a magnet.
12. A method according to claim 10, wherein the nanoparticles are fixed to a surface, and further comprising after step (ci), (cii) a washing step, comprising washing the surface to remove excess lipid solution.
13. A method according to claim 12, further comprising after step (cii), (d) a data gathering step, in which data representative of the aldehydic oxidised lipids of (i) or the aldehydic oxidised lipids and/or ,-unsaturated oxidised lipids of (ii) is obtained.
14. A method according to claim 13, further comprising (e) a data analysis step, in which the aldehydic oxidised lipids of (i) or the aldehydic oxidised lipids and/or ,-unsaturated oxidised lipids of (ii) are detected, quantified and/or identified based on the data obtained.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Embodiments of the invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(23) The embodiments described below are illustrative and by way of example only. They should not be taken to limit the scope of the invention in any way.
EXAMPLES
Methodology
(24) Lipids
(25) The lipids used in the experiments detailed below are listed in table 1.
(26) Oxidation of Native PLs Containing Esterified PUFAs
(27) Mixtures of short- and long-chain OxPLs (e.g. OxPAPC) derived from oxidation of the sn-2 PUFA residues of native PLs (e.g. PAPC) were obtained by auto-oxidation of completely dried samples at room temperature (25 C.) over night.
(28) The samples were then re-suspended in chloroform and stored under argon at 80 C. until ESI-MS or MALDI-MS analysis.
(29) Isolation and Modification of Human Low-Density Lipoprotein
(30) Immediately after venipuncture blood was supplemented with EDTA (1 mM) and BHT (20 M). Native LDL (n-LDL) was isolated from 3 mL human plasma by preparative ultracentrifugation (Sorvall ETD, SW-41 swing out rotor, 41000 rpm, 10 C., 24 h) using a discontinuous KBr density gradient.
(31) For preparation of oxidized LDL (OxLDL) the EDTA-stabilized samples (0.25 mg/ml protein) were extensively dialyzed in the cold against PBS (pH 7.4). The samples were subsequently incubated with 50 M CuSO.sub.4 for 24 hours at 37 C. for preparation of Cu(II)-oxidized LDL (Cu-LDL) or with 8 mM NaOCl in 0.8 mM NaOH for the preparation of HOCl-oxidized LDL (HOCl-LDL).
(32) Samples were stored under nitrogen in the dark at 4 C. to perform the subsequent experiments.
(33) Lipid Extraction and Micro Solid-Phase Extraction of Mouse Plasma and Lipoproteins
(34) 500 L MeOH was added to 20 L of the samples, mixed vigorously for 1 minute and kept on ice for 30 minutes for lipid extraction. Afterwards, vials were centrifuged for 5 min (10000 rpm at +4 C.) to separate the lipids from the precipitated proteins. Finally, supernatants were carefully transferred to 2 mL glass vials and stored at 70 C. before further analysis..sup.[20]
(35) Before LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis, OxPLs were separated from bulk plasma lipids using our recently established micro-preparative high-performance solid-phase extraction (HP-SPE) method..sup.[7]
(36) Briefly, C18-SPE columns (PepClean, Pierce) were first equilibrated by 500 L pure MeOH followed by an equal volume of MeOH:0.2% formic acid=70:30 (v/v) (=loading buffer). Afterwards the SPE columns were loaded 3-times by the lipid extracts (dissolved in loading buffer) followed by a 500 L washing step using loading buffer to remove most of the LPCs, followed by a single elution using 700 L MeOH: 0.2% formic acid=82:18 containing the majority of OxPCs (>60-70%) and 800 L MeOH:0.2% formic acid=98:2 containing >95% of the unoxidized PCs. The OxPC containing fraction was directly used for the subsequent LC-ESI measurements.
(37) Derivatisation of Aldehydic OxPLs
(38) Stock solutions containing 4 mM of the derivatisation reagents (2AA, 4AA, 4APA, GACA) and 8 mM sodium cyanoborohydride (CB) as reducing agent dissolved in MeOH were prepared. Additionally a stock solution of 4 mM 4-CBH in MeOH without the addition of CB was prepared.
(39) 2 L of each of these solutions was mixed with 20 L OxPLs dissolved in MeOH, or a 1:5-1:20 diluted mouse or human plasma lipid extract in MeOH, resulting in a final concentration of 400 M of the labelling reagents in the sample.
(40) Finally, the sample was incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature resulting in an almost complete reaction using 0.2 M ALDO-OxPCs (see
(41) Nanoparticle Binding of OxPLs
(42) For extraction of the OxPLs from solution, 20 L of the lipid samples were mixed with 180 L MeOH and 20 g NPs were added. The solution was briefly mixed in order to suspend the NPs and incubated 20 minutes at 4 C. These were found the optimal conditions in regard to the binding efficiency and recovery of OxPLs without affecting their endogenous levels due to auto-oxidation of the samples during incubation (see
(43) Subsequently, the NPs were sedimented by centrifugation (e.g. ZrO.sub.2NPs) or by using a magnet (e.g. Fe.sub.3O.sub.4NPs), and the supernatant containing unbound material was removed.
(44) Finally, the remaining NPs were washed by re-suspension in 500 L MeOH, sedimented again and the supernatant discarded.
(45) MALDI Sample Preparation
(46) For the detection of OxPCs in positive ionisation mode (MALDI), the NPs were mixed with 2 L ATT matrix (10 mg/mL) dissolved in EtOH:H.sub.2O=90:10 (v/v) containing 2 mM GUA and 5 mM DAHC..sup.[7]
(47) For detection of OxPCs in the negative ionisation mode (MALDI), a 9AA matrix (10 mg/mL) dissolved in ISO:ACN=60:40 containing 5 mM GUA was used..sup.[22] In either case, 1 L of the NP-matrix suspension was deposited on FlexiMass-DS (FLDS) sample plates (Shimadzu Biotech, Manchester, UK) and inserted into the MALDI instrument using a specific adaptor carrying up to four sample plates (AXIMA-Precision, Shimadzu, Manchester, UK).
(48) MALDI Mass Spectrometry
(49) Mass spectra were obtained using an AXIMA-CFRplus (Shimadzu Biotech, Manchester, UK) curved-field reflectron time-of-flight (RTOF) mass spectrometer equipped with a 337 nm pulsed nitrogen laser (3-ns pulse width).
(50) Measurements were performed either in positive or negative mode using delayed ion extraction for optimized mass resolution. The ion acceleration voltage was set to 20 kV and the reflectron analyzer was operated at 25 kV. The laser energy was adjusted to 5-10% above threshold irradiation. An integrated video imaging system (25 magnification) allows direct observation of the sample spots under investigation.
(51) A hybrid MALDI-quadrupole ion trap (QIT)-TOF mass spectrometer (AXIMA-Resonance, Shimadzu, Manchester, UK) was employed for recording of MS/MS spectra (mass range m/z 300-1000) based on low-energy collision-induced dissociation (CID) of the selected precursor ions using argon as collision gas.sup.[23]. The collision energy during the MS/MS experiments was adjusted to 100% precursor ion suppression.
(52) In MS mode 300-500 single laser shots were accumulated. In MS/MS mode 500-1000 single laser shots were accumulated. An external calibration was performed, based on the exact mass values of the [M+H].sup.+ and [MH].sup. ions using mixtures of the defined PL standards.
(53) ESI Mass Spectrometry
(54) ESI mass spectra were acquired using a 4000 QTrap triple quadrupole linear ion trap hybrid mass spectrometer equipped with a Turbo V electrospray ion source (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA).
(55) The lipid samples were dissolved in 50 l of methanol/UHQ 85:15 (v/v) containing 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid.
(56) For LC-MS analysis 5-10 L were injected onto a core-shell type C18 column (Kinetex 2.6 m, 503.0 mm ID; Phenomenex, Torrance, Calif., USA), which was kept at 20 C. A linear binary gradient consisting of 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in UHQ (eluent A) and MeOH (eluent B) was used as mobile phases at a flow rate of 400 L/min over 20 min total run time.
(57) The ion source was operated in positive ion mode using an electrospray ionization voltage of 4500 V and an ion source temperature of 550 C. Nitrogen was used as nebulizer, heater, curtain, and collision gas for MS/MS experiments. Detection was carried out by selected reaction monitoring (SRM) of the m/z 184 product ion corresponding to the PC headgroup.
(58) MS Data Analysis
(59) MS data were processed by the manufacturer supplied instrument software versions Launchpad 2.9.1 (Shimadzu, Manchester, UK) and Analyst 1.5 (Applied Biosystems), respectively. MALDI mass spectra were routinely calibrated using the exact mass values of the lipid standards and smoothed using Savitzky-Golay algorithm.
(60) Results
(61) Evaluation of Different NP-Types for Selective Detection of OxPLs
(62) Metal-Oxide Nanoparticles
(63) Metal-oxide (MeO.sub.2) particles (e.g. SnO.sub.2, TiO.sub.2, ZrO.sub.2) have been described previously for the selective analysis of phosphopetides by MALDI-MS for proteomics studies or for HPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of PLs.sup.[24][25][26].
(64) The inventors have previously shown that such particles can be used for the selective analysis of oxidised phospholipids containing carboxy-groups.
(65) Metal-oxide nanoparticles contacted with mixtures of abundant unoxidized PLs and short- and long-chain OxPLs (e.g. OxPAPC spiked mouse plasma), showed a preferential binding and enrichment of carboxy-group containing OxPCs (CARBO-OxPCs) (e.g. PGPC, PAzPC) but not aldehydic OxPCs (ALDO-OxPCs) (e.g. POVPC) and long-chain OxPCs (e.g. PEIPC). See
(66) The same enrichment effect of short-chain CARBO-OxPCs (e.g. PGPC) in contrast to neutral long-chain OxPLs (e.g. PEIPC) and the abundant unoxidized PLs (e.g. PLPC) was observed when OxPAPC-spiked mouse plasma samples were used (see
(67) Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that this selectivity relies on an ion-pairing mechanism based on the electrophilic interaction of the anionic OxPLs (e.g. CARBO-OxPLs) and the nanoparticle surfaces.
(68) Further, the inventors have found that, of the metal oxide nanoparticles tested, that only ZrO.sub.2 particles allowed the binding and detection of PLs from mixtures in positive (+) and negative () MALDI ionization mode (see
(69) Magnetic Core Nanoparticles
(70) Although ZrO.sub.2NPs were found to bind OxPLs well, the inventors found that they are sometimes unstable in solution, and needing repeated vortexing during sample incubation.
(71) In contrast, so-called magnetic-core NPs (e.g. silanized iron oxide, carbon-coated cobalt) have been shown to be very suitable for sample handling and NP-harvesting using magnetic separation..sup.[27][28]
(72) The inventors tested the selectivity of nanoparticles comprising a magnetic iron oxide (Fe.sub.3O.sub.4)-core, surface functionalised with hydrophilic polymers. The hydrodynamic diameter of the nanoparticles is approximately 100 nm. The surface layer was believed to be approximately 10-60 nm thick.
(73) Two nanoparticles types were tested. Each had a superparamagnetic magnetite (Fe.sub.3O.sub.4) core surrounded by an aminosilane matrix. One was surface-functionalized with propylamine (MAG-NH2) and the other with poly-(dimethylamin-co-epichlorhydrin-co-ethylendiamin) (MAG-PEA) respectively. These groups were selected for their anion exchange properties, and showed the same selectivity for CARBO-OxPCs (see
(74) In contrast, to gold nanoparticles (GNPs) and also the MeO.sub.2NPs, the MAG-NH.sub.2 and particularly the MAG-PEA nanoparticles showed full compatibility with ethanol, methanol or even acetone. This allows the analysis of OxPLs by MALDI-MS directly from lipid solutions extracted using these solvents (see Table 2).
(75) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 2 H.sub.2O MeOH EtOH AcOH GNPs + MeO.sub.2-NPs + + +/ NH.sub.2-NPs + + + PEA-NPs + + + + Stability of different NP-types in solvents used for lipid extraction of biological samples (e.g. mouse and human plasma). GNPs: gold-NPs, MeO2: metaloxide NPs, NH2-NPs: aminpropyl-NPs, PEA-NPs, polyetheramine-NPs. MeOH: methanol, EtOH: ethanol, AcOH: acetone.
Comparison of Different Nanoparticle Binding Efficiency
(76) Following these initial tests, methanolic lipid extracts of mouse plasma (MP) were spiked with OxPC-mixtures (e.g. OxPAPC) or defined OxPC standards (i.e. POVPC, PGPC, PONPC, PAzPC) at very low concentrations (1-5 g/A) and directly (i.e. on-probe) analyzed by MALDI-MS.
(77) The inventors have found that different NPs influence the MALDI ionization properties to different extents, and that different NPs have quite different binding efficiencies (see
(78) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 3 ZrO2 MAG-NH2 MAG-PEA 3.3 2.9 3.8 pg OxPCs/10 g NPs on target 65.9 58.6 77.0 Recovery (%) 0.53 0.47 0.62 fmol OxPCs/g NPs not specified ~2 10.sup.9 ~2 10.sup.9 NPs/g (according to the manufacturer) 1.41 10.sup.1 1.85 10.sup.1 Molecules OxPC/NP ~0.2 nmol/L ~0.2 nmol/L ~0.2 nmol/L OxPC conc. of the samples Experimental figures for different NPs for the detection of OxPLs by MALDI-MS. A mixture of 0.125 pg OxPCs/L (~0.2 nmol/L) dissolved in MeOH was used for evaluation. The total amount of OxPCs (in pg/10 g NPs) was determined based on comparison of the signal intensity of individual OxPCs measured on-probe before and after NP-binding.
(79) The OxPC recovery rate based on comparison of the individual signal intensity of the peaks from an equimolar OxPC mixtures measured on-probe together with the different NPs before and after incubation was found to be 59-77%.
(80) The number of OxPC molecules bound per NP was found to be 1.610.sup.1 for MAG-NH2 and MAG-PEA. This was sufficient to detect and quantify OxPLs at a sample concentration of 0.2 nmol/L (=200 pM) representing a 3-4 orders of magnitude higher sensitivity than the physiological concentrations of OxPLs in human or animal plasma (2 nmol/L-6 mol/L).sup.[29][30][31].
(81) In summary, based on this careful evaluation the suitability of NPs for the selective detection of OxPLs by MALDI-MS was found in the following order: MAG-PEA>ZrO.sub.2>MAG-NH2.
(82) Testing of Derivatisation Reagents for MS-Tagging and NP-Binding of OxPLs
(83) The inventors have found that, while CARBO-OxPLs (e.g. PGPC, PAzPC) can be readily extracted using nanoparticles, ALDO-OxPLs (e.g. POVPC, PONPC) cannot (see for example,
(84) The inventors use chemical derivatisation in order to introduce a negatively charged chemical group (e.g. a carboxyl group) into ALDO-OxPLs via chemical derivatisation of the -terminal aldehyde groups of the sn-2 FA residues. This allows capture of ALDO-OxPLs by nanoparticles with electrophilic surface properties, using the ion-pairing mechanism described above.
(85) Chemical derivatisation to aid in MALDI-MS analysis is known, as discussed above. The prior art strategies are intended to introduce specific mass shifts (i.e. MS-tagging) and to use characteristic reporter ions allowing a better differentiation of oxidized lipid molecules containing carbonyl-groups (i.e. aldehydes and/or ketones) from more abundant isobaric unoxidized lipid species. Another method.sup.[13] uses 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) as a reactive matrix for the analysis of OxPLs by MALDI-MS to allow the detection of small volatile aldehydes as hydrazones without the need for an additional MALDI matrix.
(86) In contrast, the inventors' method improves in detection/analysis by a) mass-tagging the derivatised aldehydes, b) improving the ionization efficiency of the OxPLs, and c) allowing nanoparticle enrichment of the OxPLs.
(87) The method allows direct (on-probe) analysis of the nanoparticles by MALDI-MS.
(88) Comparison of Reagents
(89) One example of the derivatisation method reacts 2AA with ALDO-OxPLs in the presence of a reducing agent. This reaction introduces a carboxy-group to the OxPL allowing nanoparticle enrichment. It also introduces an aromatic group, which is readily ionisable in mass spectrometry analysis. Further, there is also a characteristic mass shift of 121 Da, allowing ready differentiation from CARBO-OxPLs (see
(90) Other 2AA-derivatives were tested to determine their effect on the MALDI ionization efficiency and NP-binding of ALDO-OxPLs. When compared to 2AA; the use of 4-AA was found to improve the signal intensity of ALDO-OxPLs (e.g. POVPC and PONPC) and increase the binding efficiency to the NPs (e.g. PEA-NPs); the use of 4-APA was found to reduce the signal intensity and reduce the binding efficiency; the use of 6-ACA, which has no phenyl group, was found to have no significant impact on the ionization efficiency but to dramatically reduce the NP-binding properties of ALDO-OxPLs.
(91) See
(92) These results clearly demonstrate the influence of the physico-chemical properties of the different labelling reagents (e.g. gas-phase basicity, and steric properties) on the MALDI process, as well as the importance of optimized stereochemistry for interaction with functional groups on the NP-surface.
(93) Accordingly, the suitability of the derivatisation agents tested has been determined to be 4-AA>2AA>6ACA>4APA.
(94) 4-carboxybenzohydrazide (4-CBH) was also tested. This molecule was found to introduce a carboxy group to ALDO-OxPLs and additionally to ,-unsaturated OxPLs containing no w-terminal aldehydic groups (e.g. KDdiA-PC).
(95) 4-AA>2AA>6ACA>4APA all react by reductive amination. In contrast, 4-CBH reacts to form a hydrazine. 4-CBH provides comparative signal intensity and binding efficacy results as 4-AA, but allows analysis of additional oxidised lipids.
(96) Concentration of Derivatisation Agent
(97) The optimum 4AA-concentration has been found to be 20 M 4AA in the incubation solution, which maximised binding of CARBO- and ALDO-OxPCs to MAG-PEA-NPs.
(98) Signal quenching was observed at higher concentration (
(99) Thus, the surface capacity of 20 g MAG-PEA-NPs is sufficient to capture 80-100% of total OxPCs present at a concentration of 0.4-4 nM in the incubation solution (
(100) OxPL Profiling and Quantification from Mouse Samples
(101) The suitability of MS/MS for the targeted detection of the NP-captured OxPLs was tested using MALDI-QIT-TOF- and ESI-MS/MS as reference methods.
(102) The MS/MS spectra of both the CARBO-OxPCs and 4AA-labeled ALDO-OxPCs showed only one predominant m/z 184 fragment ion derived from the PC headgroup (see
(103) Moreover, the incorporation of 4AA into the sn-2 acyl-group of the molecules leads to a retention time shift (2.5 minutes) of the peak at m/z 715 (4AA-POVPC) compared to the unlabeled POVPC at m/z 594 (see
(104) Using crude mouse plasma samples seven major peaks could be detected in the range of m/z 590-680 dependent on the used NP-type (see
(105) The detection of the m/z 184 fragment ion within the MALDI-MS/MS spectra indicated that they correspond to OxPCs and/or OxPAFs (see
(106) A comparison between the results obtained by Nano-MALDI and LC-ESI-MS shows distinct differences in the enrichment of the individual endogenous OxPL species from the mouse plasma samples. OxPLs containing very short-chain (C4-6) oxidized sn-2 residues (e.g. SPPC) were more effectively captured by the MAG-PEA-NPs compared to OxPL enrichment using the C18 micro-columns (HP-SPE) method..sup.[21] (
(107) By comparing plasma samples from C57BL/6 mice with those of ApoE/ mice (i.e. an animal model for atherosclerosis), elevated levels of OxPLs in those fed a high-fat diet (ApoE-HF) were found (
(108) This data is in agreement with previous studies demonstrating that these OxPL concentrations were sufficient to exhibit biological and pro-atherogenic activities (e.g. stimulation of monocytes or platelet activation).sup.[35][36].
(109) OxPL Profiling and Quantification from Human Samples
(110) The above method was used for OxPL-profiling from in vitro oxidized human lipoproteins.
(111) A number of peaks attributed to individual OxPC species (which were confirmed by LC-ESI-SRM-MS/MS) were detected in the MALDI mass spectra after NP-binding from the OxLDL samples (see
(112) The highest levels of OxPCs were found in HOCl-LDL and those of lyso-phosphatidylcholines (LPCs) (which are major degradation products of OxPCs) in Cu-LDL (
(113) In a similar way to the mouse plasma testing (described above), HHdiA-SPC was found to be the major oxidation product within HOCl-LDL (
(114) Consequently, these experiments demonstrate the suitability of this (Nano-MALDI) approach to deliver information about the composition and identity of oxidised lipid molecules (i.e. OxPLs) which are known to represent oxidative stress biomarkers of biological and clinical samples (e.g. human plasma and lipoproteins)
(115) Thus this approach can be used in the development of novel (clinical) screening assays of these important oxidative stress biomarkers.
(116) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 1 CN:DB exact ion chemical name.sup.(a) abbreviation number.sup.(b) mass species supplier 1-palmitoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3- LPC16:0 sn-1 16:0.sup.(c) 496.34 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti phosphocholine 1-heptadecanoyl-2-hydroxy-sn- LPC17:0 sn-1 17:0.sup.(c) 510.36 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti glycero-3-phosphocholine 1-linolenoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3- LPC18:0 sn-1 18:0.sup.(c) 524.37 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti phosphocholine 1-O-octadecyl-2-butyryl-sn-glycero- C4-PAF C18-4:0.sup.(e) 580.43 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti 3-phosphocholine (ISD) 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3- DMPA 28:0 591.40 [M H].sup. Avanti phosphate 1-palmitoyl-2-(5-oxo-valeroyl)-sn- POVPC 21:0.sup.(f) 594.38 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti glycero-3-phosphocholine (ALDO) 1-palmitoyl-2-succinoyl-sn-glycero- S-PPC 20:0.sup.(f) 596.36 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. 3-phosphocholine (CARBO) 1-palmitoyl-2-glutaroyl-sn-glycero-3- PGPC 21:0.sup.(f) 610.37 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti phosphocholine (CARBO) 1-stearoyl-2-(5-oxo-valeroyl)-sn- SOVPC 22:0 622.41 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. glycero-3-phosphocholine (ALDO) 1-stearoyl-2-succinoyl-sn-glycero-3- S-SPC 22:0 624.39 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. phosphocholine (CARBO) 1-O-octadecyl-2-glutaroyl-sn- SG-PAF C18-5:0.sup.(e) 624.42 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. glycero-3-phosphocholine (CARBO) 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3- DMPE 28:0 634.45 [M H].sup. Avanti phosphoethanolamine 1-stearoyl-2-glutaroyl-sn-glycero-3- SGPC 22:0 638.40 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. phosphocholine (CARBO) 1-palmitoyl-2-(9-oxo-nonanoyl)-sn- PONPC 25:0.sup.(f) 650.44 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti glycero-3-phosphocholine (ALDO) 1-palmitoyl-2-(5-hydroxy-8-oxoocta- HOOA-PPC 24:1.sup.(f) 650.40 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. 6-enoyl)-sn-glycero-3- (ALDO) 1-palmitoyl-2-(4-hydroxy-7-carboxy- HHdiA-PPC 23:1.sup.(f) 652.38 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. hex-5-enoyl)-sn-glycero-3- (CARBO) phosphocholine 1-O-hexadecyl-2-azelaoyl-sn- PAz-PAF C16-9:0.sup.(e) 652.46 [M + H].sup.+ Sigma glycero-3-phosphocholine (CARBO) 1-palmitoyl-2-azelaoyl-sn-glycero-3- PAzPC 25:0.sup.(f) 666.44 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti phosphocholine (CARBO) 1-palmitoyl-2-(7-carboxy-5- HOdiA-PPC 24:1.sup.(f) 666.40 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. hydroxyhept-6-enoyl)-sn-glycero-3- (CARBO) phosphocholine 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3- DMPS 28:0 678.44 [M H].sup. Avanti phosphoserine 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3- DMPC 28:0 678.51 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti phosphocholine 1-stearoyl-2-(4-hydroxy-7- HHdiA-SPC 25:1.sup.(f) 680.41 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. carboxyhex-5-enoyl)-sn-glycero-3- (CARBO) phosphocholine 1-O-octadecyl-2-azelaoyl-sn- SAz-PAF 27:0.sup.(e) 680.45 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. glycero-3-phosphocholine (CARBO) 1-stearoyl-2-azelaoyl-sn-glycero-3- SAzPC 27:0 694.47 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. phosphocholine (CARBO) N-palmitoyl-D-erythro- SM16:0 C18-16:0.sup.(d) 703.58 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti sphingosylphosphorylcholine 1-palmitoyl-2-(9,12-dioxododec-10- KODA-PPC 28:1.sup.(f) 704.45 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. enoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (ALDO) 1-palmitoyl-2-(11-carboxy-9- KDdiA-PPC 28:1.sup.(f) 720.45 [M + H].sup.+ Cayman oxoundec-6-enoyl)-sn-glycero-3- (CARBO) phosphocholine 1-palmitoyl-2-(9-hydroxy-11- HDdiA-PPC 28:1.sup.(f) 722.46 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. carboxyundec-6-enoyl)-sn-glycero- (CARBO) 3-phosphocholine 1-stearoyl-2-(9-hydroxy-12- HODA-SPC 30:1.sup.(f) 734.50 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. oxododec-10-enoyl)-sn-glycero-3- (ALDO) phosphocholine 1-palmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-sn-glycero-3- PLPC 34:2 758.57 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti phosphocholine 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn- PAPC 36:4 782.57 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti glycero-3-phosphocholine 1-stearoyl-2-linoleoyl-sn-glycero-3- SLPC 36:2 786.60 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti phosphocholine 1-palmitoyl-2-(9-hydroxy-linoleoyl)- PLPC-OH 34:2.sup.(g) 774.57 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine 1-palmitoyl-2-(9-hydroperoxy- PLPC-OOH 34:2.sup.(g) 790.56 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. linoleoyl)-sn-glycero-3- phosphocholine 1-heptadecanoyl-2-(9Z- HMPI 31:1 793.49 [M H].sup. Avanti tetradecenoyl)-sn-glycero-3- phospho-(1-myo-inositol) 1-palmitoyl-2-(9-hydroxy-14- PLPC- 34:2.sup.(g) 806.56 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. hydroperoxy-linoleoyl)-sn-glycero-3- (OH)OOH phosphocholine 1-palmitoyl-2-(5,6- PECPC 36:3.sup.(h) 810.53 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. epoxycyclopentenone)-sn-glycero- 3-phosphocholine 1-palmitoyl-2-(5,6- PEIPC 36:2.sup.(h) 828.54 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. epoxyisoprostane)-sn-glycero-3- phosphocholine 1-stearoyl-2-docosahexaenoyl-sn- SDPC 40:6 834.60 [M + H].sup.+ Avanti glycero-3-phosphocholine 1-palmitoyl-2-(11,15-dihydroperoxy- PAPC- 36:4.sup.(g) 846.55 [M + H].sup.+ n.a. arachidonoyl)-sn-glycero-3- (OOH).sub.2 phosphocholine 1,3-bis[1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero- TMCL 56:0 1239.84 [M H].sup. Avanti 3-phospho]-sn-glycerol .sup.(a)Nomenclature according to the LIPID MAPS classification standard .sup.(b)Total number of carbon atoms and double bonds of the sn-1 and sn-2 fatty acid residues esterified to the glycerol backbone of the PL molecules. .sup.(c)LPC contain only one fatty acid together with a free hydroxyl group either in sn-1 or sn-2 position. In human plasma saturated fatty acids (e.g. 16:0 or 18:0) are preferentially linked to the sn-1 position.sup.[37] .sup.(d)SM contains one fatty acid linked via amide bond to a sphingosine backbone (long-chain base consisting of C18 or C20 carbon atoms).sup.[38] .sup.(e)PAFs contain one sn-2 fatty acid residue (usually C2-C4 carbon atoms) and one sn-1 ether-linked carbon chain (with C16 or C18 carbon atoms).sup.[39] .sup.(f)For the chemical structures see.sup.[40] .sup.(g)For the isobaric structures.sup.[41] .sup.(h)For the chemical structures.sup.[42] ALDO - OxPC containing sn-2 short-chain -terminal aldehydic fatty acid residue CARBO - OxPC containing sn-2 short-chain -terminal carboxylic fatty acid residue ISD, internal standard (synthetic compound)
REFERENCES
(117) A number of publications are cited above in order to more fully describe and disclose the invention and the state of the art to which the invention pertains. Full citations for these references are provided below. The entirety of each of these references is incorporated herein. .sup.1 P. Libby Nature 2002, 420:868-874 .sup.2 Podrez et al. Nat. Med. 2007, 13:1086-1095 .sup.3 J. A. Berliner and A. D. Watson N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353:9-11 .sup.4 F. H. Greig et al. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 2012, 52, 266-280 .sup.5 N. Leitinger Mol. Aspects Med. 2003, 24, 239-250 .sup.6 L. J. Sparvero et al. J. Neurochem. 2010, 115, 1322-1336 .sup.7 Stbiger et al. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 5502-5510 .sup.8 M. Schlame et al. J. Lipid Res. 1996, 37, 2608-2615 .sup.9 Frey et al. J. Lipid Res. 2000, 41, 1145-1153 .sup.10 A. D. Watson et al. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 24787-24798 .sup.11 K. A. Harrison et al. J. Mass Spectrom 2000, 35, 224-236 .sup.12 X. Chen et al. J. Lipid Res. 2008, 49, 832-846 .sup.13 I. Milic et al. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 156-162 .sup.14 K. Teuber et al. Anal. Lett. 2012, 45, 968-976 .sup.15 Stbiger et al. Atherosclerosis 2012, 224, 177-186 .sup.16 Reis A. et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1818, 2374-2387 .sup.17 Moumtzi A. et al., 2007, J. Lipid Res. 48:565-582 .sup.18 N. Auge et al. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1990, 22, 1990-1995 .sup.19 J. Wu et al. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2011, 164, 1-8. .sup.20 Z. Zhao and Y. Xu J. Lipid Res. 2010; 51:652-659 .sup.21 Podrez et al. Nat. Med. 2007, 13:1086-1095 .sup.22 G. Sun et al. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 7576-7585 .sup.23 R. L. Martin and F. L. Brancia 2003, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 17, 1358-1365 .sup.24 Yan. Li et al. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 2526-2538. .sup.25 Ana Gonzlvez et al. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 396, 2965-2975 .sup.26 Grady R. Blacken et al. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 5449-5456 .sup.27 Robert N. Grass et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4909-4912 .sup.28 Yan. Li et al. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 2526-2538 .sup.29 Podrez et al. Nat. Med. 2007, 13:1086-1095. .sup.30 B. Frey et al. J. Lipid Res. 2000; 41:1145-1153 .sup.31 Stbiger et al. Atherosclerosis 2012, 224, 177-186 .sup.32 K. Gopal et al. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2001, 11, 139-142 .sup.33 H. Kern et al. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1394, 33-42 .sup.34 X. Chen et al. J. Lipid Res. 2008, 49, 832-846 .sup.36 H. Kern et al. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1394, 33-42 .sup.36 E. A. Podrez et al. Nat. Med. 2007, 13:1086-1095 .sup.37 P V. Subbaiah et al. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1992; 1128:83-92 .sup.38 B. Ramstedt et al. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999; 266:997-1002 .sup.39 S M. Prescott Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000; 69:419-445 .sup.40 S L. Hazen J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 15527-15531. .sup.41 A. Reis J. Mass Spectrom. 2004; 39: 1513-1522 .sup.42 G. Subbanagounder J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 7271-7281.