USE OF CANNABINOIDS IN THE TREATMENT OF A NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE OR DISORDER
20210077455 ยท 2021-03-18
Assignee
Inventors
- Benjamin Whalley (Histon, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, GB)
- William Hind (Histon, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, GB)
- Royston Gray (Histon, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, GB)
- Javier Fernandez-Ruiz (Histon, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, GB)
- Eva De Lago (Madrid, ES)
- Carmen Rodriguez-Cueto (Madrid, ES)
- Laura Garcia-Toscano (Madrid, ES)
- Irene Santos-Garcia (Madrid, ES)
Cpc classification
A61K31/658
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/575
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/047
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/192
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/352
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/658
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/575
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61P25/28
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/352
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K2300/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K2300/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61K31/192
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K31/575
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
The present invention relates to the use of cannabinoids in the treatment of a neurodegenerative disease or disorder. In particular the cannabinoids cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) and cannabidivarin (CBDV) were able to produce neuroprotective effects in a mouse model of neurodegenerative disease. In particular these effects were associated with the symptoms associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Furthermore, the combination of the cannabinoid tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) with the drug olexisome provided a synergistic disease modifying effect in a mouse model of neurodegenerative disease. In particular these effects were associated with the symptoms associated with ALS.
Claims
1. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids cannabidiolic acid (CBDA); cannabidivarin (CBDV); and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for use in the treatment of a neurodegenerative disease or disorder.
2. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids for use according to claim 1, wherein the neurodegenerative disease or disorder is amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
3. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids for use according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the phytocannabinoid is CBDA.
4. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids for use according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the phytocannabinoid is CBDV.
5. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids for use according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the phytocannabinoid is THC.
6. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids for use according to any of the proceeding claims, for use in combination with medications used or tested in the treatment of ALS.
7. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids for use according to claim 6, wherein the medication used or tested in the treatment of ALS is one or more of riluzole, edaravone, olexisome, talampanel, or ceftriaxone.
8. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids for use according to claim 6 or claim 7, wherein the medication used or tested in the treatment of ALS is olexisome.
9. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids for use according to claim 8, wherein a combination of the phytocannabinoid THC is used with olexisome.
10. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids for use according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the phytocannabinoid is present as an extract of the cannabis plant.
11. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids for use according to claim 10, wherein the extract of the cannabis plant is a botanical drug substance (BDS).
12. One or a combination of the phytocannabinoids for use according to claims 1 to 9, wherein the phytocannabinoid is present as a highly purified, isolated or synthetic cannabinoid.
13. A method of treating a patient with a neurodegenerative disease or disorder comprising administering one or a combination of the phytocannabinoids cannabidiolic acid (CBDA); cannabidivarin (CBDV); and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to the patient in need thereof.
14. A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the neurodegenerative disease or disorder is amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0026] Embodiments of the invention are further described hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
DEFINITIONS
[0036] Definitions of some of the terms used to describe the invention are detailed in Table 1 below:
[0037] The cannabinoids described in the present application are listed below along with their standard abbreviations.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Cannabinoids and their abbreviations CBD Cannabidiol
[0038] The table above is not exhaustive and merely details the cannabinoids which are identified in the present application for reference. So far over 60 different cannabinoids have been identified and these cannabinoids can be split into different groups as follows:
[0039] Phytocannabinoids; Endocannabinoids and Synthetic cannabinoids (which may be novel cannabinoids or synthetically produced phytocannabinoids or endocannabinoids).
[0040] Phytocannabinoids are cannabinoids that originate from nature and can be found in the cannabis plant. The phytocannabinoids can be isolated from plants to produce a highly purified extract or can be reproduced synthetically.
[0041] Botanical drug substance or BDS is defined in the Guidance for Industry Botanical Drug Products Draft Guidance, August 2000, US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research as: A drug substance derived from one or more plants, algae, or macroscopic fungi. It is prepared from botanical raw materials by one or more of the following processes: pulverisation, decoction, expression, aqueous extraction, ethanolic extraction, or other similar processes. A botanical drug substance does not include a highly purified or chemically modified substance derived from natural sources. Thus, in the case of cannabis, botanical drug substances derived from cannabis plants do not include highly purified, Pharmacopoeial grade cannabinoids.
[0042] Highly purified cannabinoids are defined as cannabinoids that have been extracted from the cannabis plant and purified to the extent that other cannabinoids and non-cannabinoid components that are co-extracted with the cannabinoids have been removed, such that the highly purified cannabinoid is greater than or equal to 95% (w/w) pure.
[0043] Synthetic cannabinoids are compounds that have a cannabinoid or cannabinoid-like structure and are manufactured using chemical means rather than by the plant.
[0044] Phytocannabinoids can be obtained as either the neutral (decarboxylated form) or the carboxylic acid form depending on the method used to extract the cannabinoids. For example it is known that heating the carboxylic acid form will cause most of the carboxylic acid form to decarboxylate into the neutral form.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0045] The following examples provide evidence for the efficacy of certain phytocannabinoids in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases or disorders. Two different mouse models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have been used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the cannabinoids as neuroprotectants. Furthermore there is evidence presented to demonstrate that a combination of a phytocannabinoid with a compound used in the treatment of ALS is able to modify the neurodegenerative disease.
Example 1: Efficacy of Cannabinoids in Recovery of Symptoms in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Materials and Methods
Mouse Model
[0046] A transgenic mouse model of ALS, TDP-43, was used to determine the effects of the cannabinoids in treatment of symptoms of ALS.
[0047] The TDP-43 transgenic and wild-type mice were subjected to genotyping to identify the presence of mutant TDP-43 gene. These mice were used for a chronic i.p. treatment (from 60 days of age up to the age of 90 days) with cannabinoid or vehicle.
[0048] All studies were conducted in male mice (n=6-8 subjects in each experimental group).
Drug Treatments
[0049] The neuroprotective effects of 2 different phytocannabinoids (CBDV and CBDA) were investigated. The cannabinoids were administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day.
Symptom Recording and Analyses
[0050] Animals were recorded for neurological decline by testing rotarod performance and observing limb clasping during the whole treatment period. The weight of the animals was also recorded during the treatment period.
[0051] Animals were euthanized at the end of the treatment period and their spinal cords collected for biochemical and histopathological analyses.
Statistics
[0052] Data were assessed using one-way (immunostaining data) or two-way (rotarod data) ANOVA followed by an appropriate post-hoc test (Student Newman-Keuls for immunostaining data, and Bonferroni for behavioural data) significance was reported at p0.05. Data shown in the figures represent **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Results
[0053] TDP-43 transgenic mice experience a loss of Nissl-stained motor neurons in the spinal cord. This was almost completely recovered by treatment with CBDA and CBDV (p<0.05 between vehicle-treated and CBDA- or CBDV-treated transgenic mice) as shown in
[0054] The reduction of spinal motor neurons in TDP-43 transgenic mice was associated with an elevation in the number of astrocytes labelled with Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunostaining, in particular activated astrocytes identified by analysis of their morphological characteristics (e.g. increased cell shape and size, reduction in the length of processes).
[0055] Treatment with either CBDA or CBDV reduced total immunoreactivity for GFAP and the ratio between cell body area and process length reflecting that these cannabinoids were able to facilitate the shift from the activated to the resting state in these cells as is shown in
[0056] The number of microglial cells in the spinal cord was quantified using lba-1 immunostaining, and again differentiating resting and activated cells through the analysis of their morphological characteristics (e.g. cell shape and size, type of processes). There was a significant increase in lba-1 immunostaining in cell bodies, accompanied by a reduction in the cell processes, in TDP-43 transgenic mice versus wild-type animals, reflecting the activation of microglial cells. This was also seen when the ratio between cell body area and cell process length was calculated.
[0057]
[0058] The rotarod test was utilised to quantify the muscle weakness characteristic of TDP-43 transgenic mice. A reduction in the rotarod performance (reduced latency to fall from the rod) was seen in vehicle-treated TDP-43 transgenic mice as soon as the disease progressed.
[0059] Treatment with CBDA attenuated the rotarod worsening even at the advanced stages of the disease as is demonstrated in
[0060] At 12 weeks of age, motor performance in vehicle, CBDA and CBDV treated TDP-43 mice was significantly impaired compared to wild type, however CBDA treated TDP-43 mice displayed significantly superior performance on the rotarod compared to vehicle.
[0061] Similar positive effects with CBDA were found in the analysis of limb clasping, which increased significantly in TDP-43 transgenic mice once the disease progressed. This increase was strongly and significantly attenuated after CBDA treatment as is shown in
[0062] The weight gain of animals was also monitored, this is a variable which is frequently used to monitor disease progression in animal models of ALS. Both phytocannabinoids were able to prevent (CBDA) or reduce (CBDV) the marked weight loss exhibited by TDP-43 transgenic mice as shown in
Conclusions
[0063] CBDA and CBDV were able to prevent deterioration of spinal motor neurons in TDP-43 transgenic mice.
[0064] A clear functional recovery at the neurological level (rotarod performance and limb clasping) was seen in addition to prevent or reduce the marked weight loss that occurs in the animals which are genetically bred to develop ALS symptoms.
[0065] Such data suggests that these cannabinoids provide a novel and effective treatment option for ALS.
Example 2: Efficacy of a Cannabinoid Extract in Combination with Olexisome on Recovery of Symptoms in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Materials and Methods
Mouse Model
[0066] A transgenic mouse model of ALS, SOD1, was used to determine the effects of the combined treatment of a drug used in the treatment of ALS, olexisome, with THC.
[0067] mSOD1-transgenic (G93A) and wild-type mice were subjected to genotyping to identify the presence of mutant SOD-1. These mice were used for chronic treatment (from 10 weeks of age up to the age of 21 weeks) with test article or vehicle.
[0068] All studies were conducted in male mice (n=6-8 subjects in each experimental group).
Drug Treatments
[0069] The treatment groups were as follows: THC-BDS (10 mg/kg; i.p.); CBD-BDS (10 mg/kg; i.p); olexisome (3 mg/kg; s.c.); a combination of THC-BDS and olexisome; and vehicle. A group of wild-type animals were also treated with vehicle.
Symptom Recording and Analyses
[0070] Animals were recorded for neurological decline by testing rotarod performance during the whole treatment period. Animals were recorded for neurological decline (using a previously published ALS-related neurological scale; de Munck et al., 2013).
[0071] Animals were euthanized at the end of the treatment period and their spinal cords collected for biochemical and histopathological analyses.
Statistics
[0072] Data were assessed using one-way (immunostaining data) or two-way (rotarod data) ANOVA followed by an appropriate post-hoc test (Student Newman-Keuls for immunostaining data, and Bonferroni for behavioural data) significance was reported at p0.05. Data shown in the figures represent **p<0.01, ***p<0.001
Results
[0073] As expected, SOD-1 transgenic mice experienced a reduction in the rotarod performance, which was strongly marked towards the end of the treatment period.
[0074] Treatment with CBD-BDS was unable to increase the time spent by animals in the rod, suggesting a lack of effect on the symptoms of ALS.
[0075] Treatment with THC-BDS, olexisome or the combination of the two were able to attenuate the effect, enabling the animals treated with these compounds wo spend greater time on the rotarod. A similar effect was seen in all three groups as is shown in
[0076] There was an elevated Neurological Score in SOD-1 mutant mice, which reflects neurological decline. This was not significantly improved by CBD-BDS. It was observed that THC-BDS and olexisome given alone also displayed non-significant trends towards a reduced score, but their combination significantly reduced the elevated score recorded in SOD-1 mutant mice by 50%, indicating that this combination had synergistic effects (
[0077] The number of motor neurons in the ventral horn of the spinal cord was quantified using Nissl staining. Mutant SOD-1 mice showed a significant reduction in the number of Nissl-stained motor neurons. The treatment of these mice with CBD-BDS showed a slight increase in neurons, whereas treatment with THC-BDS or olexisome proved statistically significant compared to mutant SOD-1 mice treated with vehicle.
[0078] Surprisingly, mice treated with the combination of THC-BDS and olexisome reached a complete recovery with a number of motor neurons to a number similar to the wild-type mice as demonstrated in
Conclusions
[0079] These data suggest that THC-BDS is effective in improving the deteriorated rotarod performance shown by SOD-1 mutant mice, and, combined with olexisome, it is also able to improve the neurological decline of these mutant mice.
[0080] The ability of the combination to provide a complete recovery in the number of motor neurons in the transgenic mice is suggestive of an unexpected disease modifying effect.