Abstract
A ski for use on ice or snow is disclosed. The ski includes a ski body having a tip portion, a tail portion, and a longitudinal running length extending between the tip portion and the tail portion and a substantially flat bottom surface for sliding on snow or ice. The ski also includes a suspension system comprised of a substantially rigid support structure secured to the longitudinally central region of the said ski body at two attachment locations separated by a distance of at least 5 inches along the longitudinal axis of the ski body, and at least one resilient element configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body in the area between the two attachment locations.
Claims
1. A ski for use on ice or snow comprising: a ski body comprising a tip portion, a tail portion, and a longitudinal running length extending between the tip portion and the tail portion and a substantially flat bottom surface for sliding on snow or ice; a suspension system comprised of a substantially rigid support structure secured to a longitudinally central region of the ski body at two attachment locations; at least one spring element configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body in an area between the two attachment locations; and a linkage structure configured to impart an essentially longitudinal force between the central region of the ski body and the tip and/or tail portion of the ski body, the linkage structure having a first end connected to the central region of the ski body, a second end connected to the tip and/or tail of the ski body, wherein the linkage structure comprises a compressible resilient element.
2. The ski of claim 1 further comprising stiffening elements that increase a longitudinal flexural modulus of the ski body at the attachment locations where the support structure is secured to the ski body such that a resulting longitudinal flexural modulus of the ski at the attachment locations is greater than the longitudinal flexural modulus of the ski body in a region between the two attachment locations.
3. The ski of claim 1 wherein the ski body exhibits a lower longitudinal flexural modulus in the central longitudinal region between the two attachment locations relative to the longitudinal flexural modulus of the ski body at the two attachment locations.
4. The ski of claim 1 wherein the compressible resilient element comprises a damping element.
5. The ski of claim 1 wherein the compressible resilient element is preloaded so that the compressible resilient element will not compress until the compressive force exceeds a specific threshold, and, prior to the specific threshold force being exceeded, elongation or expansion of the preloaded compressible resilient element is precluded.
6. The ski of claim 1 wherein compression of the spring element that is configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body between the two attachment locations, increase the force that a forward linkage structure applies to a forward quarter of the running length of the ski body and/or that an aft linkage structure applies to a rear quarter of the running length of the ski body, respectively causing the tip and/or tail of the ski body to bend downward, increasing camber and/or increasing downward pressure.
7. The ski of claim 1 wherein the expansion of the spring element that is configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body between the two attachment locations, decreases the force that a forward linkage structure applies to a forward quarter of the running length of the ski body and/or that an aft linkage structure applies to a rear quarter of the running length of the ski body, respectively causing the tip and/or tail of the ski body to bend upward, increasing rocker and decreasing camber.
8. The ski of claim 1 wherein the compressible resilient element is selected from the group consisting of coil springs, torsion springs, torsion bars, leaf springs bow springs, pneumatic springs, and elastomers.
9. The ski of claim 1 wherein the spring element configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body in the area between the two attachment locations is adjustable and the opposing force can be increased and decreased.
10. The ski of claim 1 wherein the linkage structure configured to impart a longitudinal force to the tip and/or tail region of the ski body, is adjustable to increase or decrease the natural camber or rocker of the ski body.
11. The ski of claim 1 wherein at a predetermined degree of deflection, the ski body will exhibit a spring rate at least 25% less than a maximum spring rate exhibited by the ski prior to the predetermined degree of deflection.
12. The ski of claim 1 wherein the ski body is constructed with intrinsic positive camber, and the essentially longitudinal force that the linkage structure is configured to impart between the central longitudinal region of the ski body and the tip and/or tail region of the ski body is a tensive force such that the tensive force reduces the natural camber of the ski body.
13. The ski of claim 12, wherein compression of the spring element that is configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body between the two attachment locations, decreases the tensive force that the linkage structure applies to the tip and/or tail region of the ski body causing the tip and/or tail respectively to exhibit greater downward force and greater maximum camber.
14. The ski of claim 12 wherein expansion of the spring element that is configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body between the two attachment locations, increases the tensive force that the linkage structure applies to the tip and/or tail region of the ski body causing the tip and/or tail respectively to exhibit less/reduced downward force and reduced maximum camber or increased rocker.
15. The ski of claim 12 wherein the linkage structure is adjustable to increase or decrease the natural camber or rocker of the ski body.
16. The ski of claim 12 wherein at a predetermined degree of deflection, the ski body will exhibit a spring rate at least 25% less than a maximum spring rate exhibited by the ski prior to the predetermined degree of deflection.
17. The ski of claim 12 wherein the spring element configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body in the area between the two attachment locations is adjustable and the opposing force can be increased and decreased.
18. A ski for use on ice or snow comprising: a ski body comprising a tip portion, a tail portion, and a longitudinal running length extending between the tip portion and the tail portion and a substantially flat bottom surface for sliding on snow or ice; a suspension system comprised of a substantially rigid support structure secured to a longitudinally central region of the ski body at two attachment locations; at least one spring element configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body in an area between the two attachment locations; and a linkage structure configured to impart an essentially longitudinal force between the tip/front portion of the ski body and the tail/rear portion of the ski body, the linkage structure having a first end connected to the tip/front portion of the ski body, and a second end connected to the tail/rear portion of the ski body, wherein the linkage structure comprises a compressible resilient element.
19. The ski of claim 18 further comprising stiffening elements that increase a longitudinal flexural modulus of the ski body at the attachment locations where the support structure is secured to the ski body such that a resulting longitudinal flexural modulus of the ski at the attachment locations is greater than the longitudinal flexural modulus of the ski body in a region between the two attachment locations.
20. The ski of claim 18 wherein the ski body exhibits a lower longitudinal flexural modulus in the central longitudinal region between the two attachment locations relative to the longitudinal flexural modulus of the ski body at the two attachment locations.
21. The ski of claim 18 wherein the compressible resilient element comprises a damping element.
22. The ski of claim 18 wherein the compressible resilient element is preloaded so that the compressible resilient element will not compress until the compressive force exceeds a specific threshold, and, prior to the specific threshold force being exceeded, elongation or expansion of the preloaded compressible resilient element is precluded.
23. The ski of claim 18 wherein compression of the spring element that is configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body between the two attachment locations, increases the force that the linkage structure applies to a forward quarter of the running length of the ski body and to a rear quarter of the running length of the ski body, causing the tip and tail of the ski body to bend downward, increasing camber and/or increasing downward pressure.
24. The ski of claim 18 wherein expansion of the spring element that is configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body between the two attachment locations, decreases the force that the linkage structure applies to a forward quarter of the running length of the ski body and a rear quarter of the running length of the ski body, causing the tip and tail of the ski body to bend upward, increasing rocker and decreasing camber and downward pressure.
25. The ski of claim 18 wherein the compressible resilient element is selected from the group consisting of coil springs, torsion springs, torsion bars, leaf springs bow springs, pneumatic springs, and elastomers.
26. The ski of claim 18 wherein the spring element configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body in the area between the two attachment locations is adjustable and the opposing force can be increased and decreased.
27. The ski of claims 18 wherein the linkage structure configured to impart a longitudinal force to the tip and tail region of the ski body, is adjustable to increase or decrease the natural camber or rocker of the ski body.
28. The ski of claim 18 wherein at a predetermined degree of deflection, the ski body will exhibit a spring rate at least 25% less than a maximum spring rate exhibited by the ski prior to the predetermined degree of deflection.
29. A ski for use on ice or snow comprising: a ski body comprising a tip portion, a tail portion, and a longitudinal running length extending between the tip portion and the tail portion and a substantially flat bottom surface for sliding on snow or ice; a suspension system comprised of a substantially rigid support structure secured to a longitudinally central region of the ski body at two attachment locations; at least one spring element configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body in an area between the two attachment locations; and a linkage structure configured to impart an essentially longitudinal force between the tip/front portion of the ski body and the tail/rear portion of the ski body, the linkage structure having a first end connected to the tip/front portion of the ski body, and a second end connected to the tail/rear portion of the ski body, wherein the ski body is constructed with intrinsic positive camber, and the essentially longitudinal force that the linkage structure is configured to impart between the tip/front region of the ski body and the tail/rear tail region of the ski body is a tensive force such that the tensive force reduces the natural camber of the ski body.
30. The ski of claim 29 wherein compression of the spring element that is configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body between the two attachment locations, decreases the tensive force that the linkage structure applies to the tip and tail region of the ski body causing the tip and tail to exhibit greater downward force and greater maximum camber.
31. The ski of claim 29 wherein expansion of the spring element that is configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body between the two attachment locations, increases the tensive force that the linkage structure applies to the tip and tail region of the ski body causing the tip and tail to exhibit less/reduced downward force and reduced maximum camber or increased rocker.
32. The ski of claim 29 wherein the linkage structure is adjustable to increase or decrease the natural camber or rocker of the ski body.
33. The ski of claim 29 wherein at a predetermined degree of deflection, the ski body will exhibit a spring rate at least 25% less than a maximum spring rate exhibited by the ski prior to the predetermined degree of deflection.
34. The ski of claim 29 wherein the spring element configured to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the ski body in the area between the two attachment locations is adjustable and the opposing force can be increased and decreased.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) FIG. 1A depicts the longitudinal cross section of a conventional alpine ski.
(2) FIG. 1B depicts the longitudinal cross section of the runner element of an implementation of the adaptive ski described herein.
(3) FIG. 1C depicts the longitudinal cross section of the runner element of an implementation of the adaptive ski described herein.
(4) FIG. 1D depicts the central section of an implementation of the runner element of the adaptive ski that is depicted in FIG. 1C.
(5) FIGS. 2A & 2B depict alternate implementations of the runner element of the adaptive ski described herein.
(6) FIG. 3 depicts the central section of an implementation of the runner element of the adaptive ski described herein with flexible hinge points indicated.
(7) FIG. 4A depicts the longitudinal cross section of the runner element of an implementation of the adaptive ski described herein that has natural camber.
(8) FIG. 4B depicts the longitudinal cross section of the runner element of an implementation of the adaptive ski described herein that is naturally flat, with neither camber nor rocker (negative camber).
(9) FIG. 4C depicts the longitudinal cross section of the runner element of an implementation of the adaptive ski described herein that has natural rocker (negative camber).
(10) FIG. 5 shows a longitudinal cross section of an implementation of the adaptive ski described herein with key components indicated.
(11) FIG. 6 shows an exploded view of an implementation of the adaptive ski described herein with key components indicated.
(12) FIG. 7 shows a close-up view of the rear half of the central section of FIG. 6.
(13) FIG. 8 shows a latitudinal cross section view cut through the center of one of the mounting brackets.
(14) FIG. 9 shows a latitudinal cross section view cut through the center of one of the central resilient elements.
(15) FIG. 10 shows a close-up side view of the forward part of the suspension system mounted to the runner.
(16) FIG. 11A shows a longitudinal side view depicting an implementation of the adaptive ski described herein as it would be automatically configured on flat hard snow.
(17) FIG. 11B shows a longitudinal side view depicting an implementation of the adaptive ski described herein as it would be automatically configured in powder or soft snow.
(18) FIGS. 12A, B, C show longitudinal side views depicting various configurations of implementations of the adaptive ski described herein.
(19) FIGS. 13A, B show longitudinal side views depicting another implementation of the adaptive ski described herein.
(20) FIGS. 14 A, B show longitudinal side views depicting another implementation of the adaptive ski described herein.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(21) FIG. 1A depicts the profile of a conventional alpine ski. The ski is thickest in height at the center in order to create the high flexural modulus or stiffness required of the cantilever design. The ski boot is affixed to this central area via a boot binding device (not specifically shown) and thus the relatively long tip and tail sections are cantilevered from this central region, which creates large bending moments that mandate the high flexural modulus in the center. From this single central region of maximum flexural modulus, the profile and flexural modulus continually diminishes toward both tip and tail. Implementations of the adaptive ski described herein do not comprise a ski with this profile or these flexural characteristics. The differences will become apparent from the description that follows.
(22) The runner or ski part of the disclosed implementations of the adaptive ski is not a cantilever design nor does it feature a single region of maximum flexural strength in the longitudinal central section as described above. The preferred implementation of the adaptive ski comprises a runner (ski part) with a low flexural modulus in the longitudinal central region relative to two stiffer sections of the runner toward both the tip and tail.
(23) FIG. 1B illustrates the unique profile of one implementation of such a runner 12. In this instance the longitudinal flexural modulus is proportional to the thickness or height of the runner body 12, thus there are two areas of maximum stiffness as indicated by B and B separated by a distance C. The thinner central section indicated by D exhibits a significantly lower flexural modulus than the sections at B and B, which creates a totally unique dynamic compared to existing alpine skis (e.g., FIG. 1A). When such a runner is coupled to a suspension system described herein, this relatively flexible center section significantly enhances the adaptive characteristics of this invention.
(24) FIGS. 1C and 1D illustrate an alternate implementation of the runner. While the implementation illustrated in FIG. 1B achieves the low flexural modulus in the central section by thinning the height or thickness of the ski body 12 in that area relative to the areas both fore and aft of it longitudinally, the implementation of the runner in FIG. 1C achieves the lower flexural modulus in the central section by increasing the flexural modulus both fore and aft of it longitudinally with stiffening elements 53. The stiffening elements can be fabricated from a variety of materials exhibiting the characteristics to increase the measured flexural modulus of the ski in the areas where they are located.
(25) These stiffening elements 53 can be created for example by forming an additional layer or thickness of material including fiberglass, polyurethane, and/or other suitable resin material that can be bonded to the ski body in a variety of ways to increase the flexural modulus around the area of the mounting brackets 13. Additionally, these stiffening elements 53 can be integral with the mounting brackets 13 to which a suspension system can be attached. Typically, these stiffening elements 53 and attachment brackets 13 are separated longitudinally by preferably at least 5 inches (12.7 cm) as illustrated by the distance C in FIGS. 1C and 1D.
(26) FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate alternate implementations of the runner. While the implementation illustrated in FIG. 1B achieves the low flexural modulus in the central section by thinning the height or thickness of the ski body 12 in that area, there are many other methods to achieve this same flexibility. The runner profile in FIG. 2A creates the requisite central flexibility with an effective hinge 19 created by thinning the height/thickness of the runner in a longitudinally narrow region. As depicted in FIG. 2B, two or more such flexible hinge points can be utilized. These hinge points can also be created by modifying materials or removing material in other patterns.
(27) FIG. 3 depicts a runner 12 with two central flexible regions 19, each comprising, for example, four hinge points that are created by cutting channels across the top surface of the runner 12. The thickness and/or depth of the channels can be varied to create the desired level of lower flexural modulus in regions 19. Such an effective hinge can also be created by thinning the height/thickness of the runner utilizing any of a multitude of shapes and patterns. The area(s) of central flexibility can also be achieved by utilizing materials with a low flexural modulus in that area relative to materials of higher flexural modulus used in the stiffer sections of the runner. The function of the runner of this implementation of the adaptive ski described herein does not depend on any specific method of construction or design but only that there is a region or regions in the longitudinally central area that exhibit a flexural modulus lower than regions with a greater flexural modulus both fore and aft of said flexible region(s). FIG. 3 also shows a contact region 119 formed and disposed between the two central flexible regions 19. The contact region 119 is designed to have a flexural modulus that is higher than the flexural modulus of the two central flexible regions 19. As will be described in greater detail below, one or more resilient elements, for example one or more coil springs, can engage the contact region 119 to exert an opposing force between the support structure and the runner 12.
(28) The runner 12 can be manufactured with the bottom essentially flat as depicted in FIG. 4B, or with inherent camber (FIG. 4A), or inherent rocker (FIG. 4C).
(29) FIG. 5 depicts another implementation of the adaptive ski 200. The runner 12 can exhibit a wide variety of longitudinal flex patterns. A suspension system 14 is attached to the top surface of the runner 12. Two mounting brackets 13 are attached to the runner 12. When the runner 12 comprises the previously described flexible center area 52, one of the mounting brackets 13 is attached forward and one aft of the longitudinally central area 52 of the runner that exhibits the low flexural modulus relative to the flexural modulus of the runner where said mounting brackets 13 are attached.
(30) The mounting brackets 13 may comprise a resilient element 30 that comprises a lateral bore through the center 15. A support structure 16 is attached to brackets 13 by pins 17 that pass through the said bores 15 in the resilient elements 30 as well as corresponding bores in the support structure 16.
(31) With the support structure 16 thusly attached to the ski body 12, the combined structure comprises one or more resilient elements 47 arranged to create an opposing force between the support structure 16 and the ski body 12 in the area between said mounting brackets 13. The resilient element(s) 47 can be selected from the group consisting of coil springs, torsion springs, torsion bars, leaf springs, bow springs, elastomers, and pneumatic springs. Said resilient elements 47 may also exhibit damping characteristics.
(32) The resilient element(s) 47 may include a mechanism to adjust the magnitude of the opposing force that said resilient element 47 exerts between the support structure 16 and the runner body 12. Such mechanism may comprise a threaded stud 44 and a threaded ring 45 allowing said opposing force to be adjusted over a wide range from null to over 200 pounds by rotating the threaded ring 45 on the threaded stud 44 to compress or expand the resilient element 47, effectively raising or lowering the force applied by the resilient element 47.
(33) The support structure 16 may also comprise one or more resilient elements 46 positioned fore and/or aft of the region between the mounting brackets 13. The resilient element(s) 46 can be selected from the group consisting of coil springs, torsion springs, torsion bars, leaf springs, bow springs, elastomers, and pneumatic springs. The resilient elements 46 may also exhibit damping characteristics. The opposing force that said resilient element 46 exerts between the support structure 16 and the runner body 12 may be adjusted by a threaded stud 44 and a threaded ring 45 allowing said opposing force to be adjusted over a wide range by rotating the threaded ring 45 on threaded stud 44 to extend or retract the resilient element 46. The adjustment mechanism may change the vertical position of the resilient element 46 relative to the runner body 12 such that the resilient element will not engage the runner body 12 until the runner body is bent upward or deflected to a predetermined amount such as during skiing.
(34) The suspension system may also include one or more compressible resilient assemblies attached between an end of the support structure, or elements within the support structure, and the tip and/or tail region of the runner body 12. These compressible resilient assemblies can be selected from the group of compressible resilient elements that include coil springs, leaf springs, bow springs, elastomers, and pneumatic springs. The implementation of FIG. 5 depicts bow spring assemblies 29 that are attached to an end of support structure 16 by way of a pin 25 passing through a bore 40 in the mounting boss 37A of the spring assembly 29 as well as a corresponding bore 21 in the ends of the support structure 16. The mounting boss 37B on the opposite end of the spring element 39 is attached to the tip and/or tail of the ski body 12 by way of a pin 36 passing through a bore in the spring mounting boss 37B as well as a bore 43 in the coupling 20, which is attached to the ski body 12. Attaching the torsionally rigid bow spring assembly(s) 29 in this manner, with the hinge pins 25 and 36 being horizontal and parallel to the latitudinal axis of the ski body 12 as well as perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the ski body 12, results in the bow spring assembly(s) 29 also contributing significantly to the overall torsional rigidity of the adaptive ski, which greatly enhances responsiveness and control for the skier. Spring mounting boss 37B also comprises a screw 49 that is an adjustable stop for the angular motion of the spring assembly 29 relative to the ski body 12, thus affecting the magnitude of camber and rocker, as well as the preload force on the tip and/or tail. This high compliance/low spring rate preload force functionally improves stability, control, and overall performance for the skier.
(35) FIGS. 6 and 7 depict the suspension system 14 removed from the runner body 12 by removing the pins 25 and 17 (FIG. 5) leaving the spring assemblies 29 still pinned to the runner body 12 by way of the couplings 20. The support structure 16 is depicted with the toe and heel pieces 18 of a typical ski binding attached (FIG. 6). The support structure 16 is shown with the two central resilient elements 47 (although more or fewer resilient elements could be used), which as shown in this implementation are coil springs, but can be selected from the group consisting of coil springs, torsion springs, torsion bars, leaf springs, bow springs, elastomers, and pneumatic springs. The resilient elements 47 may also exhibit damping characteristics. With reference to FIG. 7, springs 47 are positioned by the threaded retainers 48, which are screwed onto threaded studs 24 that adjust the preload pressure of springs 47. The support structure 16 also comprises the resilient elements 46, which can be adjustable via threaded studs 24 that are threaded through the retainers 48 and attached to rings 45 (FIG. 6).
(36) The runner body 12 of this implementation shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 comprises two low flexural modulus regions 19 and mounting brackets 13, which comprise resilient elastomer elements 30 that include a lateral bore 15. The suspension assembly 14 is attached to the runner body 12 by positioning the support structure 16 over the mounting brackets 13 and passing pins 17 through both bores 23 in the support structure 16 and bores 15 in mounting brackets 13. These pins 17 are held in place by screws 33 (FIG. 10).
(37) FIGS. 6 and 7 also show the contact region 119 formed and disposed between the two central flexible regions 19. The contact region 119 is designed to have a flexural modulus that is higher than the flexural modulus of the two central flexible regions 19. One or more resilient elements, for example one or more coil springs 47 along with their associated hardware, can engage the contact region 119 to exert an opposing force between the support structure 16 and the runner 12.
(38) FIG. 8 is a latitudinal cross section through the center of one of the support brackets 13, depicting the close lateral side-to-side tolerance between the support structure 16 and the bracket 13, which precludes any yaw and roll motion between the two parts. A thin film of an ultra low friction bearing material 22 (for example UHMW polyethylene) separates the support structure 16 from the mounting bracket 13, which allows movement between the two in the vertical/longitudinal plane despite the close fit. While yaw and roll motion are precluded between the mounting bracket 13 and the support structure 16, the resilient couplings 30 allow the pins 17, and thus the support structure 16, some resilient and damped movement up/down and fore/aft (vertical/longitudinal plane). This resilient suspension of the support structure 16 over the ski body 12 allows the runner body to flex naturally and unimpeded during skiing as well as helping to isolate the skier from shocks and vibration. This movement also allows a slight rotation of the support structure 16 about the pitch axis relative to the ski body 12 when a skier becomes fore/aft imbalanced, which in turn alters the geometry of the suspension to create a greater down force on that portion of the ski body that would otherwise become light and unstable.
(39) FIG. 9 is a latitudinal cross section through the center of one of the resilient elements 47 positioned in the central region of the support structure 16 between the two mounting brackets 13. The resilient element 47 in this depiction is a coil spring, which is held in position by a retainer 48 that is threaded onto a likewise threaded adjuster stud 24. The adjuster stud 24 has an integral flange 50 that transmits the upward vertical force of the spring 47 to the support structure 16. The adjuster stud 24 has a recess 34 at the top that accepts a tool that can turn it in either direction, which raises or lowers the retainer 48 thus increasing or decreasing the opposing force between the support structure 16 and the runner body 12 created by the spring 47.
(40) FIG. 10 depicts the support structure 16 attached to the runner body 12 with pins 17 passed through the bores 23 in both the support structure 16 and mounting brackets 13 and held in place by screws 33. The vertical position of the resilient element 46 can be adjusted vertically up and down by turning the ring 45, which rotates the threaded stud 24. The outer circumference of ring 45 may include a knurled surface to provide additional grip when being turned in either direction. FIG. 10 also shows the details of the interconnection between the mounting boss 37 and the spring element 39, wherein the spring element 39 (shown here as a bow spring) is retained and bonded within a groove formed in the mounting boss 37.
(41) FIGS. 11A and 11B illustrate the unique functionality of the adaptive ski. FIG. 11A depicts the adaptive ski on hard or firm snow that is typical of groomed ski slopes. The skier's weight is applied to the support structure 16, which transmits that pressure to the runner 12 via the pins 17 and mounting brackets 13. These pressure points created by the skier's weight are indicated in FIG. 11A by the arrows A and A. The skier's weight pushing down at A and A will compress the central spring 47 against the firm snow under the runner, indicated by the arrow B. As the spring 47 compresses, the central section of the runner 12 that was previously convex on soft or powder snow (see FIG. 11B) pivots upward on the pins 17 in the mounting brackets 13 until the runner 12 at points A and A are also on the firm flat snow. This upward pivoting of the central section of the runner 12 upon the pins 17 in mounting brackets 13, which act as effective fulcrums at A and A, causes the tip and tail of the runner 12 to conversely pivot in the opposite direction, bringing them downward to engage the firm snow. This is the ideal configuration for a ski in firm snow conditions because a longer length of the ski and ski edge engage and make contact with the snow surface. The pressure from the spring 47, which is immediately under the skier's boot, creates a small region of high pressure that causes the steel edge of the runner 12 to easily penetrate the firm snow providing unprecedented control and stability. Likewise, the tip and tail are held firmly against the firm snow by the moment forces created by the skier's downward weight at A and A against the firm snow at B. Thus, on firm snow, the adaptive ski transforms into the ideal groomed-snow carving ski.
(42) When the adaptive ski encounters soft snow or powder, there is no longer firm snow under the runner at B and the spring 47 expands against the center section of the runner 12, pivoting the center section downward on the pins 17 in the mounting brackets 13 as depicted in FIG. 11B. This causes the tip and tail to pivot upwards thus creating the ideal convex or rocker configuration that is ideal for soft snow or powder.
(43) When the runner 12 comprises the previously described flexible center area 52, this unique functionality, depicted in FIGS. 11A & 11B, is significantly enhanced.
(44) This novel functionality represents the first ever alpine ski that will automatically transform into an ideal powder ski in powder and an ideal carving ski on firm groomed slopes.
(45) FIGS. 12A, 12B, and 12C depict an alternate implementation of the ski depicted in FIG. 5, which differs from that of FIG. 5 in two significant details. Firstly, the runner 12 in this implementation is fabricated with intrinsic camber as depicted in FIG. 12A (the camber in FIG. 12A is exaggerated for clarity). Secondly, as illustrated in FIG. 12B, the compressive spring elements 39 shown in FIG. 5 are replaced by tension elements 28 that connect the ends of the support structure 16 or elements within the support structure 16 with couplers 20 attached to the tip and tail sections of the runner 12. These tension elements 28, which can be solid linkages or flexible cables, pull the tip and tail sections of the runner 12 upward, thus reducing the intrinsic camber of the runner 12 as depicted in FIG. 12B. The tension elements 28 can be further shortened to pull the tip and tail of the runner 12 into a rocker configuration as depicted in FIG. 12C. Additionally, the length of the tension elements 28 can be adjustable, and thus a wide range from camber to rocker can be created allowing the ski to be fine-tuned to particular conditions. This configuration also creates a high compliance preload on the tip and tail similar to that of the implementation of FIG. 5, which provides great stability in all conditions as well as mitigating sudden forces at the tip or tail that could imbalance a skier.
(46) FIGS. 13A and 13B illustrate an implementation of the adaptive ski shown in FIGS. 5 thru 11 that comprises an additional mechanism that enhances the previously described functionality. In this implementation, the tip and tail compressive spring assemblies 29 are not pinned directly to the support structure 16 but pinned 25 to hinge blocks 38 that can slide longitudinally in the ends of the support structure 16. The sliding hinge blocks 38 are connected to additional sliding hinge blocks 32 by linkages 35. The linkages 35 may be threaded into the hinge blocks 38 and/or 32, thus providing adjustment of the pressure and vertical position of the tip and tail sections of the runner 12 when the ski is unweighted and not pressured against the snow. The sliding hinge blocks 32 are pinned to one end of linkages 31, the other end of linkages 31 being pinned 26 to the hinge plate 27 that is attached to or positioned on the runner 12 between the flexible hinge regions 19 of the runner and under the central springs 47.
(47) The functionality of this implementation is conceptually identical to that depicted and described by FIGS. 11A and 11B with the added benefit of enhanced tip and tail adjustment and control. When the runner 12 is on firm or hard snow as in FIG. 11A, the springs 47 are compressed and the tip and tail of the runner 12 will be forced downward as previously described. However in this implementation, the compression of springs 47 results in the hinge plate 27 rising vertically relative to the support structure 16 thus forcing, via the respective linkages 31, the sliding hinge blocks 32 to slide longitudinally toward the respective ends of the support structure 16. This in turn, via the linkages 35, pushes the respective sliding hinge blocks 38 longitudinally outward relative to the support structure 16. This in turn forces the mounting hinge bosses 37A of the spring assembly 29 outward toward the tip and tail respectively resulting in the spring assembly 29, and thus compressive resilient elements 39, pushing the tip and tail further downward onto the snow with increased force. Thus, in firm or hard snow, the linkage described in this implementation will provide additional tip and tail stability and control.
(48) Conversely, when the runner 12 encounters soft snow or powder, the springs 47 will expand as illustrated and explained in FIG. 11B, causing the tip and tail to bend upward into a rocker configuration ideal for those conditions. However in this implementation, the expansion of springs 47 results in the hinge plate 27 moving vertically away from the support structure 16 thus pulling, via the respective linkages 31, the sliding hinge blocks 32 longitudinally toward the center of the support structure 16. This in turn, via the linkages 35, pulls the respective sliding hinge blocks 38 longitudinally inward toward the center of the support structure 16. This in turn pulls the mounting hinge bosses 37A of the spring assembly 29 inward toward the support structure 16 resulting in the spring assembly 29, and thus compressive resilient elements 39, pulling the tip and tail further upward into a more extreme rocker configuration. Thus, on firm groomed snow, this implementation has the enhanced tip and tail contact with the snow provided by the spring assemblies 29, resulting in extraordinary control and stability. And in soft snow and powder it will still automatically assume the rockered configuration that is best suited for those conditions. Additionally, the adaptive ski exhibits extraordinary torsional rigidity and instantaneous responsiveness due to the fact that roll input from the skier's boot is transmitted directly to the tip and tail of the runner by the spring assemblies 29 as well as by the mounting brackets 13, which are located at the stiffest regions of the runner 12.
(49) Additionally, this implementation can be combined with the implementation depicted in FIGS. 12A, B, & C, in which case the compressive resilient elements 39 in FIGS. 13 A & B are replaced by tension elements 28 (depicted in FIG. 12C) that connect the sliding hinge blocks 38 in FIGS. 13A & 13B at the ends of the support structure 16 with couplers 20 attached to the tip and tail sections of the runner 12. These tension elements 28, which can be solid linkages or flexible cables, pull the tip and tail sections of the runner upward, reducing the intrinsic camber of the runner 12 as depicted in FIG. 12B, or upward into a rocker configuration as depicted in FIG. 12C.
(50) When the runner 12 encounters soft snow or powder, the springs 47 will expand as illustrated and explained in FIG. 11B, causing the tip and tail to bend upward which is ideal for those conditions. However in this implementation, the expansion of springs 47 results in the hinge plate 27 moving vertically away from the support structure 16 thus pulling, via the respective linkages 31, the sliding hinge blocks 32 longitudinally toward the center of the support structure 16. This in turn, via the linkages 35, pulls the respective sliding hinge blocks 38 longitudinally inward toward the center of the support structure 16. This in turn pulls the mounting hinge bosses 37A and the tension element 28 inward toward the support structure 16 resulting in the tension elements 28 pulling the tip and tail further upward into a more extreme rocker configuration.
(51) Conversely, when the runner 12 is on firm or hard snow as in FIG. 11A, the springs 47 are compressed and the tip and tail of the runner 12 will be forced downward as previously described. However in this implementation, the compression of springs 47 results in the hinge plate 27 rising vertically relative to the support structure 16 thus forcing, via the respective linkages 31, the sliding hinge blocks 32 to slide longitudinally toward the respective ends of the support structure 16. This in turn, via the linkages 35, pushes the respective sliding hinge blocks 38 longitudinally outward relative to the support structure 16. This in turn forces the mounting hinge bosses 37A and the respective ends of the tension elements 28 outward toward the tip and tail respectively resulting in the tension forces being substantially precluded from tension elements 28 allowing the tip and tail to bend further downward onto the snow. Thus, in firm or hard snow, this implementation will provide additional tip and tail stability and control.
(52) FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate an implementation of the adaptive ski shown in FIGS. 13A and 13B wherein the coil spring resilient elements 47 and the related components 27, 31, 44, and 48 are replaced with a bow spring or leaf spring 51. The functionality of this implementation is identical to that described for the implementation depicted in FIGS. 13A and 13B. As the bow spring 51 is compressed, the extremities will move longitudinally toward the respective ends of the support structure 16, which will force the sliding hinge blocks 32 to slide longitudinally toward the respective ends of the support structure 16. This in turn, via the linkages 35, pushes the respective sliding hinge blocks 38 longitudinally outward relative to the support structure 16. This in turn forces the mounting hinge bosses 37A of the spring assembly 29 outward toward the tip and tail respectively resulting in the spring assembly 29, and thus compressive resilient elements 39, pushing the tip and tail downward onto the snow with increased force. Thus in firm or hard snow, this implementation will provide additional tip and tail stability and control.
(53) Conversely, when the bow spring 51 expands vertically, the extremities will move longitudinally inward toward the center of the support structure 16, causing the sliding hinge blocks 32 to also move longitudinally toward the center of the support structure 16. This in turn, via the linkages 35, pulls the respective sliding hinge blocks 38 longitudinally inward toward the center of the support structure 16. This in turn pulls the mounting hinge bosses 37A of the spring assembly 29 inward toward the support structure 16 resulting in the spring assembly 29, and thus compressive resilient elements 39, pulling the tip and tail further upward into a more extreme rocker configuration, ideal for powder conditions.
(54) It is understood that this invention is not confined to the particular implementations shown and described herein, the same being merely illustrative, and that this invention may be carried out in other ways within the scope of the appended claims without departing from the spirit of the invention as it is understood by those skilled in the art that the particular implementations shown and described are only a few of the many that may be employed to attain the express and implied objects of the invention.
