Method for extracting contaminants from agrarian products and apparatus therefor
10959449 · 2021-03-30
Assignee
Inventors
- Eva-Maria Binder (Tulln, AT)
- Barbara Cvak (Vienna, AT)
- Alois Schiessl (Vienna, AT)
- Georg Häubl (Vienna, AT)
Cpc classification
A23L5/20
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A23V2002/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
In a method for extracting contaminants from agrarian products or foods or animal feeds containing agrarian products, comprising contacting a solvent for the contaminants with the agrarian products containing or having adsorbed the contaminants, or the foods or animal feeds, and at least one extraction buffer in an optionally closable mixing vessel, the extraction buffer, which is contained in a film soluble in the solvent and is supplemented with at least one surfactant, in particular nonionic surfactant, and the contaminated agrarian product or food or animal feed are contacted with cold water as solvent in the mixing vessel, and the extraction buffer and the contaminants are brought into solution by agitating or stirring in the mixing vessel; and apparatus therefor.
Claims
1. A method for quantitatively extracting contaminants selected from the group consisting of mycotoxins, allergens and genetically modified organisms from agrarian products or foods or animal feeds containing agrarian products, comprising the step of: providing the agrarian products or foods or animal feeds containing agrarian products that contain or absorbed contaminants selected from the group consisting of mycotoxins, allergens and genetically modified organisms, providing at least one extraction buffer in a film that is water soluble, contacting distilled water, the at least one extraction buffer, at least one surfactant and a powdery carrier with the agrarian products or the foods or animal feeds containing agrarian products, in a closable mixing vessel, closing the closable mixing vessel, agitating or stirring the mixing vessel so that the film is dissolved and the at least one extraction buffer and the contaminants are brought into solution, and extracting the contaminants from the agrarian products or foods or animal feeds containing agrarian products; wherein the distilled water has a temperature 8 C. and 25 C.; and wherein the at least one extraction buffer selected from the group consisting of borate buffers, carbonate buffers, citrate buffers, phosphate buffers and Tris/HCl buffer.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the extraction buffer is used at a concentration of between 10 mM and 100 mM.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein an inert silicate powder is used as said powdery carrier.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the surfactant is selected from polyoxyethyelene lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene acetyl ether, 4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl-polyethylene glycol, (1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl-polyethylene glycol, or sodium dodecyl sulfate.
5. The method according to claim 3, wherein the inert silicate powder is a high purity silicic acid.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one buffer comprises at least two of the following components: sodium or potassium salts of boric acid, carboxylic acid, citric acid, phosphoric acid, phosphorous acid, TRIS (Tris(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane) and NaCl, said buffer after dissolution having a molarity of 6 to 250 mM, and a pH ranging from 6.5 to 9.5.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the surfactant is non-ionic.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the buffer after dissolution having a molarity of 10 to 100 mM, and a pH ranging between 7.1 and 9.1.
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one extraction buffer selected from the group consisting of borate buffers having a pH of 8.5, carbonate buffers having a pH of 9.1, citrate buffers having a pH of 7.1, phosphate buffers having a pH of 7.4 and Tris/HCl buffer having a pH of 7.4.
10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the agrarian product is maize and the contaminant is mycotoxins, aflatoxins, deoxynivalenol, fumonisins or zearalenones.
11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the surfactant is selected from polyoxyethyelene lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene acetyl ether, 4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl-polyethylene glycol, (1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl-polyethylene glycol, or sodium dodecyl sulfate; and wherein the at least one extraction buffer selected from the group consisting of borate buffers having a pH of 8.5, carbonate buffers having a pH of 9.1, citrate buffers having a pH of 7.1, phosphate buffers having a pH of 7.4 and Tris/HCl buffer having a pH of 7.4.
12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the method further comprises the step of detecting an amount of the contaminant.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) In the following, the invention will be explained in more detail by way of exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawing. Therein,
(2)
(3)
(4)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(5) In detail,
(6)
(7)
(8) After the complete dissolution of the extraction buffer 3, a conventional strip test can, for instance, be used to examine the presence of contaminants.
Example 1
Detection of Different Mycotoxins in Maize Samples
(9) The Tables below show the detection of different mycotoxins in maize samples when tested with different buffers comprising salts and surfactants, and a summary of the detection of toxins in the phosphate buffer system (each at concentrations of 10 mM and 100 mM), performed with ELISA: carbonate buffer, pH 8.5 carbonate buffer, pH 9.1, citrate buffer, pH 7.1, phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 and Tris/HCl buffer, pH 7.5.
(10) In the Tables, the following detection ratios are indicated:
(11) TABLE-US-00001 Results of strip tests (LFDs): Result Detection (+) .sup.<30% + 30-50% ++ 50-80% +++ .sup.>80%
Aflatoxins:
(12) Table 1 shows the detection of aflatoxins in maize samples. Different buffer combinations (salt+surfactant) were tested.
(13) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1 Aflatoxins Tween Tween Triton Triton Brij Brij 20 80 X100 X114 35 58 SDS [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] Buffer [mM] 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 Borate ++/++ ++/+++ ++/++ ++/+++ ++/++ ++/+++ +++/++ 10 mM Borate ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ +++/++ 100 mM Carbonate ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/++ ++/+++ ++/++ ++/+++ +++/++ 10 mM Carbonate ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/++ ++/+++ ++/++ ++/++ +++/++ 100 mM Citrate +/+ +/++ +/++ +/++ +/++ +/++ ++/+ 10 mM Citrate +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+ ++/+ 100 mM Phosphate ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/+++ ++/+++ +++/++ 10 mM Phosphate ++/+++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/+++ ++/+++ +++/++ 100 mM Tris/HCl ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ +++/++ 10 mM Tris/HCl ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ +++/++ 100 mM
Deoxynivalenol:
(14) Table 2 shows the detections of deoxynivalenol in maize samples. Different buffer combinations (salt+surfactant) were tested.
(15) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2 Deoxynivalenol Tween Tween Triton Triton Brij Brij 20 80 X100 X114 35 58 SDS Buffer [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [mM] 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 Borate +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/++ 10 mM Borate +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/++ 100 mM Carbonate +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/++ 10 mM Carbonate +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/++ 100 mM Citrate ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/+ 10 mM Citrate ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/+ 100 mM Phosphate +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/++ 10 mM Phosphate +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/++ 100 mM Tris/HCl +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/++ 10 mM Tris/HCl +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/+++ +++/++ 100 mM
Fumonisins:
(16) Table 3 shows the detections of fumonisins in maize samples. Different buffer combinations (salt+surfactant) were tested.
(17) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 3 Fumonisins Tween Tween Triton Triton Brij Brij 20 80 X100 X114 35 58 SDS [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] Buffer [mM] 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 Borate ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 10 mM Borate ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 100 mM Carbonate ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 10 mM Carbonate ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 100 mM Citrate ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 10 mM Citrate ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 100 mM Phosphate ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 10 mM Phosphate ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 100 mM Tris/HCl ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 10 mM Tris/HCl ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 100 mM
Zearalenones:
(18) Table 4 shows the detections of zearalenones in maize samples. Different buffer combinations (salt+surfactant) were tested.
(19) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Zearalenone: Tween Tween Triton Triton Brij Brij 20 80 X100 X114 35 58 SDS [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] Buffer [mM] 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 Borate +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/+ 10 mM Borate +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/+ 100 mM Carbonate ++/+++ ++/+++ +++/++ ++/+++ +++/++ ++/+++ +++/+ 10 mM Carbonate ++/+++ ++/+++ +++/++ ++/+++ +++/++ ++/+++ +++/+ 100 mM Citrate +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+ ++/+ 10 mM Citrate +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+ +/+ ++/+ 100 mM Phosphate +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/+ 10 mM Phosphate +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/++ +++/+ 100 mM Tris/HCl ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ +++/++ ++/+++ +++/+ 10 mM Tris/HCl ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ ++/+++ +++/++ ++/+++ +++/+ 100 mM
(20) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 5 Summary of LFD results: Tween Tween Triton Triton Brij Brij 20 80 X100 X114 35 58 TOXIN [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] [%] SDS [%] PBS buffer 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 0.1/1 Aflatoxins ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/+++ ++/++ +++/+ 10 mM Aflatoxins ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/++ ++/+++ ++/++ +++/+ 100 mM Deoxynivalenol +++/+ +++/+ +++/++ +++/+ +++/++ +++/+ +++/+ 10 mM Deoxynivalenol +++/+ +++/+ +++/++ +++/+ +++/++ +++/+ +++/+ 100 mM Fumonisins ++/++ ++/++ ++/+++ ++/++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 10 mM Fumonisins ++/++ ++/++ ++/+++ ++/++ ++/(+) ++/(+) ++/(+) 100 mM Zearalenones ++/+++ +++/+ +++/++ +++/+ +++/++ ++/+ +++/+ 10 mM Zearalenones ++/+++ +++/+ +++/++ +++/+ +++/++ ++/+ +++/+ 100 mM
(21) It follows from the above Tables that the LFD and ELISA results are comparable, and the different buffer systems and different surfactants and concentrations are applicable to the extraction method, yielding reliable results.
Example 2
Extraction of Food Allergens Using an Extraction Buffer Contained in Water-Soluble Films
(22) Tris/HCl and a PBS buffer, each shrink-wrapped in a water-soluble film, are introduced into a plastic container and supplemented with cold tap water until 100 mM, 150 mM, 200 mM and 250 mM solutions have each formed. The solutions had pH values ranging between 6.5 and 8.8 as a function of the employed buffer.
(23) Both extraction buffers enabled the quantitative extraction of the following food allergens, using all four different concentrations: -lactoglobulin, casein, cashew nut, egg white, peanut, fish, hazelnut, crustaceans, lupin, almond, milk, ovalbulmin, pistachio, mustard, sesame, soy, walnut.
Example 3
Extraction of Genetically Modified Organism Using an Extraction Buffer Contained in Water-Soluble Films
(24) Tris/HCl, PBS and a borate buffer, each shrink-wrapped in a water-soluble film along with Tween or Triton and silicagel, are introduced into a plastic container and supplemented with cold tap water until 100 mM, 150 mM, 200 mM and 250 mM solutions have each formed.
(25) Both extraction buffers enabled the quantitative extraction of the following genetically modified organisms, and the quantification of the results by Statfax and Chromate readers, using all four different concentrations: RUR, Cry1F, Cry1AB, Cry3bb, LL, Cry34AB1, VIP, Btk, BR, B2R, EPSPS, DAS Cry1Ac.