Security door hinge assembly
10947761 ยท 2021-03-16
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
E06B5/113
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E05D5/0215
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E05D11/0027
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
International classification
Abstract
A security door hinge assembly is provided, comprising a door frame structure, having at least a head member, a first jamb member and a second jamb member, and at least one door leaf. The door leaf further comprises a leaf frame structure, having at least a top rail member, a bottom rail member, a hinge stile member and a lock stile member; an inner leaf panel, mounted to a first side of said leaf frame structure and extending past said hinge stile member, so as to form an inner leaf flange; an outer leaf panel, mounted to a second side of said leaf frame structure, opposite said first side, and extending past said hinge stile member, so as to form an outer leaf flange, and wherein, in use, said door leaf is operable between a first closed position and a second open position. The security door hinge assembly further comprises a hinge chamber positioned between said first jamb member and said hinge stile; a hinge-mount bracket, coupled to said first jamb member; a hinge mechanism, having at least one pivot axis and which is located within said open hinge chamber and adapted to pivotally mount said door leaf to said hinge-mount bracket, and wherein, in said first closed position, said inner leaf flange is in an exteriorly overlapping engagement with at least a portion of said hinge mount bracket, so as to prevent access to said hinge mechanism.
Claims
1. A security door hinge assembly comprising: a door frame structure, having at least a head member, a first jamb member and a second jamb member; at least one door leaf comprising: a leaf frame structure, having at least a top rail member, a bottom rail member, a hinge stile member and a second stile member; an inner leaf panel, mounted to a first side of the leaf frame structure and extending past the hinge stile member, so as to form an inner leaf flange; an outer leaf panel, mounted to a second side of the leaf frame structure, opposite the first side, and extending past the hinge stile member, so as to form an outer leaf flange; and wherein, in use, the door leaf is operable between a first closed position and a second open position; at least one body panel, mounted to the first jamb member and extending past the first jamb member, so as to form a body panel flange; a hinge-mount bracket, coupled to the first jamb member so as to form an open or closed hinge chamber in conjunction with said body panel flange between said first jamb member and said hinge stile; a hinge mechanism, having at least one pivot axis and which is located within the hinge chamber and adapted to pivotally mount the door leaf to the hinge-mount bracket; and wherein, in the first closed position, the outer leaf flange is in an interiorly overlapping engagement with the body panel flange and the inner leaf flange is in an exteriorly overlapping engagement with at least a portion of the hinge mount bracket, so as to prevent access to the hinge mechanism.
2. The security door hinge assembly according to claim 1, wherein the body panel is arranged in a first plane defined by a lateral outer surface of the door frame structure.
3. The security door hinge assembly according to claim 2, wherein the outer leaf panel and extending outer leaf flange are arranged in a second plane that is parallel to and inwardly offset from the first plane.
4. The security door hinge assembly according to claim 3, wherein the at least one pivot axis of the hinge mechanism is located substantially in the second plane of the outer leaf flange.
5. The security door hinge assembly according to claim 4, wherein the at least one pivot axis of the hinge mechanism is located in a plane adjacent to the second plane.
6. The security door hinge assembly according to claim 5, wherein the at least one pivot axis of the hinge mechanism is located in a plane parallel to and exteriorly offset from the second plane.
7. The security door hinge assembly according to claim 1, further comprising a door leaf support bracket that is operably coupled to the leaf frame structure and the inner leaf flange, and which is adapted to structurally support the inner leaf flange.
8. The security door hinge assembly according to claim 7, wherein the hinge mechanism is operably coupled to the leaf frame structure via the door leaf support bracket.
9. The security door hinge assembly according to claim 1, wherein the outer leaf flange is adapted to freely move within the open hinge chamber when the door leaf is moved between the first closed position and the second open position.
10. The security door hinge assembly according to claim 1, wherein the outer leaf flange has a length that is sufficient to continually conceal the hinge mechanism, when the door leaf is moved between the first closed position and the second open position.
11. The security door hinge assembly according to claim 1, wherein the body panel flange, the outer leaf flange and the inner leaf flange are separate members, the body panel flange is operably mountable to the first and second jamb member, and each one of the outer and inner leaf flange is operably mountable to a respective side of the leaf frame structure.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only and not in any Limitative sense, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)
(9) The exemplary embodiment(s) of this invention will be described in relation to a hinge assembly for security doors and in particular a double-door security door system. However, it should be appreciated that, in general, the concealment characteristics of the hinge assembly of the present invention will work equally well with any other door, flap, gate or any other pivotably arranged closure member.
(10) Referring now to
(11) A particular reason for concealing the hinge may be considered in the context of the SR ratings above. A conventional solution to obtain a higher SR rating for a hinge might be as noted above to use the same design but with thicker and more exotic or otherwise more attack-resistant materials. The invention makes use of the principle that materials is that if something is protected from attack in the first place then the need to use exotic materials or particular designs to withstand an attack is diminished. The result is that the hinge can be cheap enough to remain cost effective at what might otherwise be SR2 level while still being viable at SR5. Additional resistance to the attack may be provided at the higher SR levels by progressively increasing the protection afforded to the hinge by the door itself by virtue of thicker/additional door materials and design features associated with the door. Indeed it could be pointed out that even if the hinge were to be defeated or even removed altogether then the doors would still not be openable without first unlocking the doors themselves as the closed door dimensions become bigger than the door frame opening into which they are fitted as shown for example in
(12) Referring now to
(13) In one embodiment, the inner door leaf flange 220 and the outer door leaf panel flange 208 may be separate members mountable to the door leaf assembly 102, 104. However, in another embodiment, the inner door leaf flange 220 and the outer door leaf panel flange 208 may be integral part of respective inner and outer door leaf panels 118 and 120 of the door leaf assembly 102, 104. In one embodiment, the body panel flange 206 may be a separate member operably mountable to the first or second jamb member 112, 114. In another alternative embodiment, the body panel flange 206 may be an integral part of a body panel mounted to the first or second jamb member 112, 114.
(14) When the door leaf assembly 102, 104 is in the closed position, the body panel flange 206 overlaps with the outer door leaf panel flange 208 and a portion of the door leaf support bracket 218 (i.e. the flange portion coupled to the inner door leaf flange 220) overlaps with a portion of the hinge mount bracket 202, preventing or at least restricting any access to the hinge mechanism 210. During operation, for example, when moving the door leaf assembly 102, 104 from a first closed position to a second open position (see
(15) Consequently, it is not possible to attack the hinges on such a security door-set 100 without first attacking the outer door leaf assembly 102, 104. Here, concealment means that the door assembly 100 provides no clues about where best to start an attack. Therefore, a combination of this security hinge assembly 200 with, for example, a dogging feature on each door 102, 104 offers an significantly improved protection to wedge-, lever-, crow-bar- and other attacks, because the concealing hinge action of the hinge assembly 200 has been designed to position the outer door leaf behind the front face of the door frame structure 106. This forces any attacker to cut significant amounts of steel simply to get access to the hinge mechanism 210, which in-turn gives no benefit anyway, because the hinges are actually redundant when the door 102, 104 is in its closed position. Furthermore, any hammering and wedging will not lead to access to the hinge mechanism 210, as the outer leaf panel 120 will continue to conceal the hinge, even when bent inwards (i.e. towards the hinge mechanism 210).
(16) In particular, the hinge action positions the front of the outer door leaf panel 120 behind the frame structure 112, 114 over the entire length of the door 100. Therefore, the hinge assembly 200 of the present invention provides another significant advantage by moving the door into the closed position through an arc that guides the reinforced inner leaf panel flange 220 (reinforced by the door leaf support bracket 218) to wrap around the rear of the hinge mount bracket 202 (part of the frame structure 106). As this occurs over the entire length of the door 100, it is likely to significantly frustrate any attacker by adding yet more defensive layers to the security door system 100.
(17) The hinge design of the invention can support use in a variety of security categories (such as LPC 1175 SR 2 to 5) in that the resistance of the hinge to attack at higher attack levels may be achieved by incrementally increasing the integrity of the material shrouding the hinge.
(18) An alternative arrangement, in which the hinge in held in a closed hinge chamber, is shown in
(19) In this embodiment, the hinge action positions the front of the outer door leaf behind the frame section over the entire length of the door. The hinge action brings another significant feature to the product by carrying the door into the closed position through an arc that guides the reinforced inner leaf to wrap around the rear of the door frame. Since this occurs over the entire length of the door it significantly frustrates attacks by adding defensive layers to the door set.
(20) The figures show the action of the door as it moves into the closed position and the overlap dogging shown in the closed position runs the full length of the profile.
(21) This arrangement means that as all hinge fixings are concealed from the attack surface by significant amounts of steel that simply getting into a position where an attack could be started is very difficult.
(22) It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the above embodiment(s) has been described by way of example only and not in any Limitative sense, and that various alterations and modifications are possible without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.