Method for testing the rigidity of a disposable

Abstract

A method for testing the rigidity of a particular disposable for volumetric balancing, for a blood treatment device. The method includes filling the disposable or portion thereof with a liquid, enclosing the filled liquid, so that a certain volume of liquid is present in the disposable unit or the portion thereof, supplying and/or discharging a certain volume of liquid, and measuring the change in pressure caused by the supply and/or discharge of the volume of liquid. A blood treatment device is also provided.

Claims

1. A method for testing a rigidity of a particular disposable for volumetric balancing, for a blood treatment device, comprised of the following steps: filling the disposable or portion thereof with a liquid, said disposable or portion thereof being made of a plastic material and having at least two balancing chambers connected to one another by connecting channel, said connecting channel being coupled to a pressurizing pump; enclosing the filled liquid so that a certain volume of liquid is present in the disposable unit or portion thereof; supplying to and/or discharging a certain volume of pressurizing liquid from the disposable using the pressurizing pump, the balancing chambers and the connecting channel being located between valves which are operated so that the pressurizing liquid is isolated from remaining portions of the blood treatment device; measuring a pressure change caused by the supply and/or discharge of the volume of pressurizing liquid to determine whether the rigidity of the particular disposable is acceptable for use with the blood treatment device, a more rigid disposable producing larger increases or decreases in said measured pressure change than a disposable with wall portions that are more yielding and thus allow a greater volume change.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the pressurizing pump is a pump of a blood treatment device.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the pump is the ultrafiltration or dialysate pump.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method is carried out before, after or simultaneous with a pressure holding test.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the supply and/or discharge of the volume of pressurizing liquid, along with the measurement of pressure change, is carried out multiple times.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the enclosing of liquid takes place by closing of the valves.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the pressure measurement takes place in or on the pressurizing pump, or in or on an area of the disposable.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the disposable passes the rigidity test, and may be used with the blood treatment device, when the measured pressure change exceeds a defined threshold within a defined test period.

9. A blood treatment device comprising at least one input disposable intended for volumetric balancing, said disposable being made of a plastic material, said blood treatment device including one or more actuators that are configured to act on the disposable, one or more pumps that are designed to send a certain volume of liquid into and/or out of the disposable, one or more pressure sensors that are designed to measure the pressure of the liquid contained in the disposable, an evaluation unit that is designed to compare a change in the measured pressure with a threshold, and a locking unit that is designed to prevent the operation of the blood treatment device when the change in the measured pressure does not reach or exceeds the threshold, said blood treatment device further including at least one processor controlling at least one pump and being programmed to fill the disposable or portion thereof with a liquid, enclose the filled liquid so that a certain volume of liquid is present in the disposable unit or portion thereof, supply and/or discharge a certain volume of liquid, and measure the pressure change caused by the supply and/or discharge of the volume of liquid to determine whether the particular disposable is acceptable for use with the blood treatment device, a more rigid disposable producing larger increases or decreases in said measured pressure change than a disposable with wall portions that are more yielding and thus allow a greater volume change.

10. The blood treatment device according to claim 9, wherein the pump is the ultrafiltration pump or dialysis pump of the blood treatment device.

11. The blood treatment device according to claim 9, wherein the pressure sensor is located in or on the pump or in or on the disposable.

12. The blood treatment device according to claim 9, wherein the blood treatment device has one or more valves, by means of which a certain volume of liquid can be shut off in the disposable.

13. The blood treatment device according to claim 9, wherein the evaluation unit is designed to display whether the pressure change measured has exceeded the threshold or not.

14. The blood treatment device according to claim 9, wherein the evaluation unit is designed to compare a speed of the pressure change measured with a threshold.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) Further details and advantages of the invention will be explained with reference to the embodiment displayed in the Figures.

(2) These display:

(3) FIG. 1: a schematic view of a dialyzer with a disposable as a balancing system,

(4) FIG. 2: a schematic view of a dialyzer according to FIG. 1 with an ultrafiltration pump for supplying a further fluid volume, as well as with a connecting line for connection of the channels to be tested,

(5) FIG. 3: a further schematic view of a dialyzer according to FIG. 1, with an altered pump arrangement as compared with FIG. 2, and altered cable connection arrangement as compared with FIG. 2 for connection of the channels to be tested,

(6) FIG. 4: a further schematic view of a dialyzer according to FIG. 1 with two connecting lines for connecting the channels to be tested, along with possible pressure sensor arrangements,

(7) FIG. 5: a view of the pressure course over time with a volume-specific shift and

(8) FIG. 6: a view of the pressure course over time for several successive shifts in volumes, and for a pressure holding test.

(9) In the figures, identical or functionally identical parts are designated by identical reference characters.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

(10) Further scope of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.

(11) FIG. 1 shows a cartridge designed as disposable as reference number 1, used in a dialyzer, not illustrated.

(12) For the dialysis device, the dialyzer is shown by reference number 10, the interior of which is divided by a membrane consisting of a hollow fibre bundle in a dialysate compartment and a blood chamber. The blood chamber comprises the interior spaces of the hollow fibres.

(13) The blood flow through dialyzer 10 is identified by reference B and the dialysate through cassette 1 and through dialyzer 10 is identified by reference D.

(14) The dialyzer can be a haemodialysis, hemofiltration or haemodiafiltration device, for example. However, any other blood treatment devices are included for the invention.

(15) Cartridge 1 includes Channels 2 and 3, and chambers for directing and balancing fresh and spent dialysis fluids.

(16) The chambers of cartridge 1, serving for balancing, are together characterized as reference 20. The balancing system, 20, is configured such that the volume displaced from one chamber corresponds with the dialysis fluid volume supplied to the other chamber. The confirmation of the chambers is performed by dialysis device actuators. Furthermore, the dialysis device features plungers, clamps or other actuators that act as valves, and are able to lock the cartridge channels.

(17) To carry out a rigidity test rigidity test according to the present invention, a volume of Cartridge 1 is shut off by closing the valves, i.e. by disconnecting the cartridge 1 channels, for example.

(18) A specific fluid volume is thus occluded.

(19) For example, valves in feed channels and discharge ports 2 and 3 for the dialysis fluid and between balancing system 20 and dialyzer 10, as well as on the side facing away from the dialyzer of the balancing system will be closed, so that the volume located in between is occluded.

(20) Such a situation results in FIG. 2. In FIG. 2, closed channels of cartridge 1 or closed valves are marked x. An open channel or an open valve is characterized by the numeral II. The same applies to the other figures.

(21) The channel not shut off, or connecting line 4, connects input and output channels 2 and 3 together.

(22) The ultrafiltration pump of the dialysis device is identified by reference number 30.

(23) This is associated with the interior of the cartridge 1 via an open channel, such that the dialysate used in operating the dialysis device is removed from cartridge 1.

(24) To carry out the rigidity tests according to the invention, the ultrafiltration pump 30 is used to carry out a known volume displacement in the occluded hydraulic system of cartridge 1. This volume displacement may consist of a supply and/or withdrawal of liquid to or from cartridge 1.

(25) The rigidity of the walls of cartridge 1 are indicated by measurement of the pressure inside cartridge 1.

(26) The more yielding the cartridge, 1, i.e. the lower the rigidity of cartridge 1, the lower the pressure changes, which are caused by a volume displacement. The stiffer the cartridge, 1, i.e. the higher the rigidity of cartridge 1, the greater the pressure changes, which are due to a volume displacement.

(27) The measured pressure change is thus a measure of the rigidity of the part of cartridge 1 in which the volume is occluded.

(28) In the case outlined in FIG. 2, the ultrafiltration pump 30 exerts the volume shift. However, any other pump that can bring about a volume change in cartridge 1 is suitable for this purpose. It may be a dialysis device pump, or a pump used specifically for determining rigidity.

(29) FIG. 3 illustrates a further embodiment. In this, Channel 4, linking channels 2 and 3, is located not between the balancing system 20 and the dialyzer, but on the side of the balancing system 20 facing away from the dialyzer.

(30) Further deviating from the arrangement, according to FIG. 2, channel 3 is only shut off through a valve. This is located between balancing system 20 and the dialyzer 10. On the other, open side of the channel, 3, is a dialysate, not illustrated, which carries out the volume displacement V in cartridge. 1

(31) A comparison between FIGS. 2 and 3 demonstrates that the position of the shut-off valve x and the open channel 4 is not critical. Rather, the decisive factor is that a closed volume of fluid is constituted in the interior of the cartridge 1, open only to the pump, which, through the pump or such like, an additional fluid volume is supplied or a certain volume discharged by means of the pump or such like.

(32) FIG. 4 shows an embodiment in which a channel 4, connecting channels 2 and 3, is arranged both between the balancing system 20 and the dialyzer 10, and also on the side facing away from the dialyzer 10 side of the balancing system 20.

(33) Furthermore, pressure sensors are indicated by reference P, which measure the pressure in the occluded volume of cartridge 1. As can be seen from FIG. 4, such a sensor P may be located at either the pump 30 or one of the channels 2 or 3.

(34) Other locations for pressure measurement are also possible, and encompassed by the invention. It is thus possible, for example, to measure pressure in the balancing system 20.

(35) The one or more pressure sensors have the task of measuring the volume shift induced pressure change in the occluded fluid volume.

(36) FIG. 5 shows an example of a pressure measurement before, during and after the supply volume in the occluded area of the cartridge as a relative pressure with respect to atmospheric pressure.

(37) In the example illustrated in FIG. 5, there is a pressure increase of approximately 93 mbar from supplying a fluid volume into the occluded area.

(38) When the pressure exceeds a defined limit within the test time, such as the value of 80 mbar within 1 s, the rigidity test is passed and the cartridge 1 is found to be good. If the limit is not reached at all or exceeded only after expiry of the test period, the rigidity test is failed and the cartridge 1 is discarded.

(39) FIG. 6 shows the pressure curve computed when carrying out a procedure referred to as the compliance test according to the invention.

(40) The pressure curve shown in FIG. 6 is based on a method in which an initial filling of cartridge 1 is made, so that the pressure reaches a certain level (in this case about 900 mbar).

(41) A displacement volume of 1.5 ml is then made into and out of the closed system of cartridge 1.

(42) As seen in FIG. 6, the deduction of volume from cartridge 1 leads to a reduction in pressure of about 550 mbar, and the supply of volume into cartridge 1, to a pressure increase of about 900 mbar. The pressure change, due to the volume displacement, of about 350 mbar is sufficient, since it exceeds the threshold of 190 mbar/ml.

(43) The above values are examples, and not limitative.

(44) The changing volume shift (change from fluid supply and fluid discharge) excludes disruptive effects.

(45) The rigidity test according to the invention is combined with a pressure holding test, according to FIG. 6.

(46) After performing the rigidity tests, no further fluid volume is supplied or removed, and the pressure is further measured.

(47) If the pressure drop over time is below a threshold (here, 20 mbar/min), the pressure holding test is passed. The pressure holding test is based on a certain rigidity of the cartridge. If this is more flexible, the test time and permissible threshold should be adjusted.

(48) The method according to the invention, i.e. the rigidity test, can be carried out before treatment or by commissioning the dialysis device. It can also be carried out during treatment and be triggered by one or more different circumstances.

(49) The invention being thus described, it will be apparent that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be recognized by one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.