Prosthesis

Abstract

Prosthesis including prosthetic links driven by actuators, first sensors that sense current state ZUS(t); second sensors that sense biosignals SIG.sub.BIO(t); third sensors that sense data D.sub.UMG(t); processing device; and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processing device, perform operations including: determining based on SIG.sub.BIO(t), ZUS(t), and D.sub.UMG(t), model M.sub.A(t) of an action A, and predicting motions B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)), dependent on M.sub.A(t) for a time period; determining a decision E to replace A with an action A(E) based on SIG.sub.BIO(t), ZUS(t), D.sub.UMG(t), and B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)) according to an evaluation scheme, wherein A(E) can define a reflexive and/or protective motion, and if A(E) does not define the reflexive and/or protective motion, then determining model M.sub.A(t) of A(E) and predicting motions B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)), dependent on M.sub.A(t), for the time period; deriving control signals Sig(t) based on B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)) or B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)), or based on the reflexive and/or protective motion, and controlling/regulating the actuators based on Sig(t).

Claims

1. A prosthesis to replace a missing extremity of a living being, the prosthesis comprising: one or more prosthetic links configured to be driven by actuators, wherein a proximal prosthetic link has a mechanical interface to fix the proximal prosthetic link to the living being; first sensors configured to sense a current state ZUS(t) of the prosthesis, wherein the current state ZUS(t) is a state of contact between the prosthesis and an environment; second sensors configured to sense biosignals SIG.sub.BIO(t) of the living being associated with controlling the missing extremity; third sensors configured to sense data D.sub.UMG(t) that describe a current environment of the prosthesis, including objects and/or other living beings located in the environment; a processing device; and a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processing device, perform operations comprising: determining a model M.sub.A(t) of an action A to be performed by the prosthesis based on the biosignals SIG.sub.BIO(t), the state ZUS(t) of the prosthesis, and the data D.sub.UMG(t), and predicting motions B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)), dependent on the model M.sub.A(t), of the prosthetic links for a time period [t, t+t]; determining a discrete decision E to replace the action A with an action A(E) based on an evaluation of the biosignals SIG.sub.BIO(t), the state ZUS(t), the data D.sub.UMG(t), and the predicted motions B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)) in accordance with a specified evaluation scheme, wherein the action A(E) is enabled to define a reflexive motion and/or protective motion of the prosthesis that is autonomously controlled in an open-loop/closed-loop manner, and wherein, if the action A(E) does not define the reflexive motion and/or protective motion of the prosthesis that is autonomously controlled in an open-loop/closed-loop manner, then determining a model M.sub.A(t) of the action A(E) to be performed by the prosthesis, and predicting motions B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)), dependent on the model M.sub.A(t), of the prosthetic links for the time period [t, t+t]; and deriving control signals Sig(t) and controlling/regulating the actuators to drive the prosthetic links based on the control signals Sig(t), wherein the control signals Sig(t) are based on currently valid, predicted motions B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)) or B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)), or based on the reflexive motion and/or protective motion that is autonomously controlled in an open-loop/closed-loop manner.

2. The prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the prosthesis includes an input interface configured to receive a user input prompting the processing device to stop motion of the prosthesis.

3. The prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise determining the decision E for the action A(E), which defines the reflexive motion and/or protective motion of the prosthesis that is autonomously controlled in an open-loop/closed-loop manner independently of the biosignals SIG.sub.BIO(t), based on the current state ZUS(t) and/or the data D.sub.UMG(t).

4. The prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise triggering the decision E for the action A(E), which defines a reflexive motion and/or protective motion of the prosthesis that is autonomously controlled, when: a current motion of the prosthetic links deviates from the predicted motion B.sub.eweg(M(t)) or B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)) of the prosthetic links by more than a specified limit; and/or a current motion of the prosthetic links deviates from a learned model, which observes nominal states of the prosthesis and corresponding critical deviations from the nominal states; and/or it is discernible based on the current state ZUS(t) and the data D.sub.UMG(t) that the action A or the action A(E) to be executed by the prosthesis was not or will not be executed, or was or will be executed, in a flawed manner, and/or an unintentional collision of one or more prosthetic links with an object in the environment has occurred or will occur; and/or a temperature recorded by a temperature sensor of the prosthesis reaches or exceeds a limit G2; and/or a distal end of the prosthesis has approached an object up to a specified distance or environment envelope; and/or the current state ZUS(t) of the prosthesis corresponds to a state to which the following applies: ZUS(t).Math.Z.sub.AUS,erlaubt, wherein Z.sub.AUS,erlaubt indicates the quantity of all allowed states ZUS(t).

5. The prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the operations of controlling/regulating the actuators associated with a further motion of the prosthesis based on currently sensed biosignals SIG.sub.BIO(t) and/or after an input of a user of the prosthesis via an input interface of the prosthesis after an execution of a reflexive and/or protective autonomous motion, wherein the input interface is designed and set up for manual, and/or optical, and/or acoustic, and/or tactile user input.

6. The prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the first sensors comprise one or more of the following sensors: one or more joint sensors configured to sense motor position, motor speed, and/or motor acceleration; output sensors; acceleration sensors; force sensors configured to determine forces transferred to the environment due to individual prosthetic links and configured to determine forces transferred from the environment onto the individual prosthetic links as well as to determine interaction forces between the prosthesis and the living being wearing the prosthesis; torque sensors configured to determine torques transferred to the environment due to the individual prosthetic links and to determine torques transferred from the environment onto the individual prosthetic links; tactile sensors configured to locally sense effective forces and torques; temperature sensors configured to sense temperatures acting upon the prosthesis; and humidity sensors configured to sense humidity acting upon the prosthesis.

7. The prosthesis according to claim 6, wherein tactile sensors are comprised in an artificial skin to locally sense effective forces and torques.

8. The prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the operations of controlling/regulating the actuators comprise: providing multiple apps that control the prosthesis, wherein each app defines an operating mode of the prosthesis; selecting a respective app based on input to an input interface of the prosthesis from a mobile unit; and configuring the app as selected to control the prosthesis.

9. The prosthesis according to claim 8, wherein the app comprises a control program and a control parameter set.

10. The prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the second sensors comprise one or more electromyography sensors and/or one or more electroencephalography sensors, wherein individual electromyography sensors and/or electroencephalography sensors are applied to the living being or implanted in the living being.

11. The prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the operations comprise automatically adapting the mechanical active and/or passive impedance through a corresponding change in the control signals Sig(t), based on the current state ZUS(t) and the data D.sub.UMG(t).

12. The prosthesis according to claim 11, wherein the mechanical active and/or passive impedance is stiffness of the prosthesis.

13. The prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise determining the model M.sub.A(t)/M.sub.A(t) as a learning-capable process, which autonomously learns motions B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t))/B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)) of the prosthetic links based on historical data, for executing the action A/A(E).

14. The prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the living being is a human being.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) In the drawings:

(2) FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a proposed prosthesis.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(3) FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a proposed prosthesis 100 to replace a missing extremity of a living being, particularly of a human being, which includes one or more prosthetic links driven by actuators 101, wherein a proximal prosthetic link has a mechanical interface for fixing the proximal prosthetic link to the living being; first sensors 102, which sense a current state ZUS(t) of the prosthesis, particularly a state of contact between the prosthesis and an environment; second sensors 103, which sense biosignals SIG.sub.BIO(t) of the living being to control the missing extremity; third sensors 104 for sensing data D.sub.UMG(t), which describe a current environment of the prosthesis, particularly objects and/or other living beings in the environment; a prediction unit 105, which determines, based on the biosignals SIG.sub.BIO(t), the state ZUS(t) of the prosthesis, and the data D.sub.UMG(t), a model M.sub.A(t) of an action A to be executed with the prosthesis and predicts motions B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)), dependent on a model M.sub.A(t), of the prosthetic links for a period of time [t, t+t]; an evaluating unit 106 by which the discrete decision E to replace the action A with another action A(E) can be determined based on an evaluation of the biosignals SIG.sub.BIO(t), the state ZUS(t), the data D.sub.UMG(t), and the predicted motions B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)) in accordance with a specified evaluation scheme, wherein the action A(E) can define a reflexive motion and/or protective motion of the prosthesis that is autonomously controlled in an open-loop/closed-loop manner, and wherein, if the action A(E) does not define such a reflexive motion and/or protective motion of the prosthesis that is autonomously controlled in an open-loop/closed-loop manner, the prediction unit 105 determines a model M.sub.A(t) of the action A(E) to be performed by the prosthesis and predicts motions B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)), dependent on the model M.sub.A(t), of the prosthetic links for a time period [t, t+t]; and a control unit 107, which derives control signals Sig(t) to control the actuators and further controls/regulates the actuators based on the control signals Sig(t), wherein the control signals Sig(t) are based on the currently valid, predicted motions B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)) or B.sub.eweg(M.sub.A(t)), or based on the reflexive and/or protective motion autonomously controlled in an open-loop/closed-loop manner. The prosthesis can include a processing device 108, which can perform the operations of the units 105-107 as described herein. In particular, the processing device 108 can include a processor and a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform any one or more of the operations of units 105-107 as described herein.

(4) Although the invention has been illustrated and explained in more detail by preferred example embodiments, the invention is not limited by the disclosed examples and other variations may be derived by one of ordinary skill in the art without extending beyond the protective scope of the invention. It is thus clear that a plurality of variation options exist. It is likewise clear that example embodiments actually only represent examples, which are not to be interpreted in any manner as a limitation, for example, of the protective scope, the use options, or the configuration of the invention. Rather, the previous description and the description of figures should make one of ordinary skill in the art capable of specifically implementing the example embodiments, wherein one of ordinary skill in the art with knowledge of the disclosed concept of the invention can undertake various changes, for example with respect to the function or the arrangement of individual elements listed in an example embodiment, without going beyond the scope of protection, which is defined by the claims and the legal equivalents thereof such as, for example, more extensive explanations in the description.

LIST OF REFERENCE NUMBERS

(5) 101 Actuators 102 First sensors 103 Second sensors 104 Third sensors 105 Prediction unit 106 Evaluating unit 107 Control unit 108 Processing device