Method for controlling frequency of stand-alone microgrid and power converter for energy storage device for controlling same

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for controlling the frequency of a stand-alone microgrid wherein an energy storage device of the stand-alone microgrid is operated as a main power source by controlling a battery power conditioning system (PCS) of the stand-alone microgrid in a constant voltage constant frequency (CVCF) mode. According to the present invention, it is possible to operate the frequency stably while considering the fuel cost and power generation efficiency of a stand-alone microgrid.

Claims

1. A method of controlling frequency of a stand-alone microgrid, wherein a charging/discharging amount of an energy storage device is received through a control means formed in a battery power conditioning system (PCS) of the stand-alone microgrid, and frequency of the microgrid system is controlled in accordance with the received charging/discharging amount of the energy storage device, thereby operating the energy storage device as a main power source of the stand-alone microgrid, and wherein frequency of the battery PCS is controlled by deriving an equivalent stiffness of the entire microgrid system according to an input of the charging/discharging amount of the energy storage device.

2. The method of claim 1, comprising: controlling the battery PCS in a constant voltage constant frequency (CVCF) mode; measuring a state of charge (SOC) of the energy storage device; comparing the SOC measured in the measuring of the SOC with a predetermined reference; and controlling cutoff or input of a controllable load in the microgrid according to a result of the comparing of the SOC with the predetermined reference.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising: measuring the SOC after the controlling of cutoff or input of the controllable load, wherein when the measured SOC is out of the predetermined reference, the frequency of the microgrid system is controlled according to the received charging/discharging amount of the energy storage device.

4. A power conditioning system (PCS) for an energy storage device of a stand-alone microgrid, wherein an energy storage device of the stand-alone microgrid is operated as a main power source by controlling a battery PCS of the stand-alone microgrid in a constant voltage constant frequency (CVCF) mode, and wherein frequency of the battery PCS is controlled by deriving an equivalent stiffness of the entire microgrid system according to an input of the charging/discharging amount of the energy storage device.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein a state of charge (SOC) of the energy storage device is measured, the measured SOC is compared with a predetermined reference, and cutoff or input of a controllable load in the microgrid is controlled according to a result of the comparison.

6. The system of claim 5, wherein a charging/discharging amount of the energy storage device is input by a control means, and the frequency of the microgrid system is controlled according to the received charging/discharging amount of the energy storage device.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a view illustrating a power supply configuration of a stand-alone microgrid.

(2) FIG. 2 is a view illustrating a phase follower circuit applied to a PCS for a battery.

(3) FIG. 3 is a view illustrating a configuration of a controller in CVCF mode for a battery PCS.

(4) FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of operating frequency of a stand-alone microgrid according to the present invention.

(5) FIG. 5 is a view illustrating references of BESS SOC for controlling frequency of a stand-alone microgrid according to the present invention.

(6) FIG. 6 is a view illustrating a relationship between configurations for implementing an automatic frequency control principle.

(7) FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a method relating to frequency adjustment.

(8) FIG. 8 is a view illustrating an association with a PCS controller by manual frequency control.

BEST MODE

(9) In order to fully understand operational advantages of the present invention and objects achieved by the practice of the present invention, reference should be made to the accompanying drawings which illustrate preferred embodiments of the present invention and contents described in the accompanying drawings.

(10) In describing the preferred embodiments of the present invention, a description of known or repeated descriptions that may unnecessarily obscure the gist of the present invention will be reduced or omitted.

(11) A stand-alone microgrid proposed in the present invention is configured so that the use of a diesel generator is minimized as much as possible and a battery is operated as the main power source.

(12) Theoretically, the diesel generator is designed to operate only when the power is not normally supplied by using energy stored in the battery due to an extreme weather event or a fault of new renewable energy source.

(13) In this case, the operation of the battery performs control to make a waveform of the output voltage by internally generating phase without using a PLL, which is defined as a constant voltage constant frequency (CVCF) mode in which the voltage and frequency of the system are constantly controlled.

(14) A configuration of the controller in the CVCF mode for the designed battery PCS is shown in FIG. 3.

(15) Accordingly, when the power charged in the battery is stably maintained, the frequency of the stand-alone microgrid may be constantly controlled to the rated frequency (60 Hz).

(16) This may be implemented by allowing the battery PCS instantly to compensate for surplus power and insufficient power of the microgrid system.

(17) The power stored in the battery may be determined by measuring a state of charge (SOC).

(18) That is, the automatic frequency control of the stand-alone microgrid of the battery PCS is performed according to a value of SOC, and the control operation thereof is as shown in FIG. 4.

(19) Upper and lower references shown in FIG. 4 are as shown in FIG. 5. As shown, the upper and lower references 1 mean a relatively safe area than the upper and lower references 2 and serve as references for utilizing the controllable load at the maximum

(20) The upper and lower references 2 are the maximum and minimum values of the safe region that enable the battery SOC not to reach a dangerous value, respectively.

(21) It is preferable to use 80 to 90% as the upper reference and 20 to 30% as the lower reference.

(22) FIG. 6 illustrates communication connections between the battery PCS and other devices to implement the automatic frequency control principle. In other words, the battery PCS is configured to communicate with the diesel generator and the new renewable energy source, thereby receiving the operating state and transmitting the control command, and communicate with the controllable load, thereby receiving the load state and transmitting the control command.

(23) When the operation of the stand-alone microgrid starts, the battery PCS performs control in the CVCF mode and measures a SOC value of the battery (S10).

(24) It is determined whether the measured SOC value of the battery is less than the lower reference 1 (S20). When the measured SOC value is lower than the lower reference 1, in order to allow the frequency fluctuation to be minimized by maintaining the state of SOC at the maximum, first, the controllable load is cut off (S21).

(25) The controllable load is cut off, and then the SOC value of the battery is measured (S22). As a result of the measurement, it is determined that the battery SOC is less than the lower reference 2 (S23), and when the SOC is less than the lower reference 2, the SOC is determined to be in the danger area so that an output command for activating the diesel generator is transmitted (S24).

(26) After the command is transmitted, the battery SOC is measured to continuously check whether the SOC has a value greater than the lower reference 2. As a result of the determination in step S23, when the battery SOC is greater than the lower reference 2, the battery SOC is measured again to perform the comparison with the lower reference 1 in the step S20.

(27) On the other hand, when the battery SOC is greater than the lower reference 1 as a result of the step S20, the battery SOC value is compared with the upper reference 1 (S30).

(28) As a result of the comparison, when the battery SOC value is greater than the upper reference 1, the battery may be stably controlled as the main power source so that controllable load is input (S31).

(29) Then, the battery SOC value is measured (S32) to perform comparison with the upper reference 2 (S33), and as a result of the comparison, when the battery SOC is greater than the upper reference 2, the battery SOC is in an excess state so that the output of the new renewable energy source is limited (S34).

(30) After the output is limited, the battery SOC is measured to continuously check whether the SOC has a value higher than upper reference 2. As a result of the determination in the step S33, when the battery SOC is smaller than the upper reference 2, the SOC is measured again to perform the comparison with the upper reference 1 in the step S30.

(31) As described above, the automatic frequency control using the battery PCS has an advantage that the frequency of the stand-alone microgrid may be constantly controlled in a stable manner. For the automatic frequency control, communication between the battery PCS and each of the distributed power source and the controllable load is required to maintain the battery SOC in a stable range. Although the communication is the most stable when using a dedicated wire line, when problems occur in communication line or communication equipment, there is a problem that the SOC value of the battery may not be maintained in a stable area.

(32) In this case, the present invention proposes a manual frequency control function for the battery PCS.

(33) That is, the control function is possible by providing a manual control means (a switch, a lever, a knob, etc.) for maintaining the battery SOC at a place, such as a battery PCS panel, to which an operator easily may access.

(34) In this way, an operator may precisely specify the charging/discharging power of the battery to a specific value through the control means in order to maintain the battery SOC, whereby the frequency may be controlled.

(35) Considering the principle of the manual control, it is noted that the manual control is divided into a case when the SOC rises and a case when the SOC rises.

(36) When the battery SOC continuously increases even after the SOC of the battery becomes greater than the upper reference 2, this means that the automatic frequency control does not operate properly. This case needs a manual control means that enables the operator to manually stop the new renewable energy source and the diesel generator.

(37) Herein, the operator may accurately input the battery charging/discharging power value to be maintained by using the control means, and the new renewable energy source and the diesel generator are not re-input until the power value is satisfied.

(38) When the battery SOC continuously decreases even after the SOC of the battery becomes smaller than the lower reference 2, this also means that the automatic frequency control does not operate properly. In this case, the operator may also control the SOC manually using the control means.

(39) The control principle is due to the following characteristics of the power system.

(40) When the frequency of the power system is lowered, 1) the output of the diesel generator performing the droop control increases, and 2) the load is lowered according to the frequency sensitivity of the load.

(41) The process of 1) may be expressed by the following Equation 1.

(42) $\begin{array}{cc}{P}_G=-\frac{f}{R_{\mathrm{eq}}}& \left[\mathrm{Equation}1\right]\end{array}$

(43) Herein, P.sub.G is a change amount of the power generation amount in the microgrid, and when a value of P.sub.G is a positive number, this means an increase in power generation amount, and when a value of P.sub.G is a negative number, this means a decrease in power generation amount.

(44) f is a frequency fluctuation amount, and when it is a positive number, this means a rise in frequency, and when it is a negative number, this means a decrease in frequency, and R.sub.eq means an equivalent droop coefficient in the operating state.

(45) Since the frequency of the microgrid system is controlled by the battery PCS, the output of other power sources in the microgrid system may be indirectly controlled without communication by changing the frequency. Therefore, when the equivalent droop coefficient may be obtained accurately, the output of the other power source may be accurately controlled, thereby charging the battery.

(46) The process of 2) may be expressed by the following Equation 2.
P.sub.D=D.sub.eqf[Equation 2]

(47) P.sub.D is a variation of a frequency-sensitive load. Generally, when the frequency is reduced, a size of the load is also reduced, and when the frequency is increased, a size of the load also increases proportionally.

(48) D.sub.eq is an equivalent frequency sensitivity factor of the load.

(49) When the processes of 1) and 2) are shown together, the battery charging/discharging amount with respect to the frequency variation amount may be expressed by Equation 3 and Equation 4.

(50) $\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{\mathrm{BESS}}=P_G-P_D=\left(=\frac{1}{R_{\mathrm{eq}}}-D_{\mathrm{eq}}\right)f=-{}_{\mathrm{eq}}f& \left[\mathrm{Equation}3\right]\\ {}_{\mathrm{eq}}=\frac{1}{R_{\mathrm{eq}}}+D_{\mathrm{eq}}& \left[\mathrm{Equation}4\right]\end{array}$

(51) FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating the above process.

(52) The operator manually specifies the battery SOC value to a specific value (S40).

(53) Performing manual control means a situation in which the control of another power source may be unreliable through communication. Therefore, it is not possible to check through communication how many diesel generators are properly supplying power to the current system. That is, no information on the R.sub.eq value is given.

(54) Accordingly, an equivalent stiffness of the whole system is derived through the analysis of the system characteristics of the microgrid (S50). This may be obtained from Equation 3. By adding a small amount of change, which is only a few percent of the frequency command value, is added, and measuring the change in the charging/discharging amount of the battery at that time, it is possible to obtain .sub.eq. That is, when the SOC value of the battery or the charging/discharging power is determined according to the manual control means of the operator, the frequency command value of the battery PCS is changed (S60), thereby achieving the desired object.

(55) There is a problem that the frequency fluctuates in entire microgrid system according to the adjustment of the control command of the battery PCS, so it is important to prevent a physical failure of the battery in advance. When the frequency fluctuation amount is stably managed in a certain range, it is difficult to minimize an influence on the power system.

(56) FIG. 8 shows a method of associating a frequency manual control result with a controller of a battery PCS. In this case, the charging/discharging power P.sub.ref set by the operator and the frequency control command fluctuation amount (=f) may be obtained from Equation 3 as shown in Equation 5 below.

(57) $\begin{array}{cc}=f=-\frac{P_{\mathrm{ref}}}{{}_{\mathrm{eq}}}& \left[\mathrm{Equation}5\right]\end{array}$

(58) While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be obvious to those of ordinary skill that the invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. On the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and alternative arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention covers the modifications and variations of this invention provided they fall within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.

DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

(59) S10: measuring battery SOC S20: comparing SOC with lower reference 1 S21: cutting off controllable load S22: measuring battery SOC S23: comparing SOC with lower reference 2 S24: transmitting command to operate diesel generator S30: comparing SOC with upper reference 1 S31: inputting controllable load S32: measuring battery SOC S33: comparing SOC with upper reference 2 S34: controlling output of new renewable energy source