Ergonomic work station chair
10918213 ยท 2021-02-16
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
A47C7/029
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A47C9/002
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
A ventral support for use in an ergonomic work station chair, the ventral support comprising an adjustable Y axis member and a support unit, the support unit pivotally and extendibly attached to the adjustable Y axis member, wherein the support unit is heart-shaped and includes a rear, a face, and a top therebetween, the face including a right lobe and a left lobe, a clavicles support, which has a right side and a left side, is raised, is proximate the top and is horizontally disposed, and a central ridge, which extends vertically downward from the clavicles support, wherein the right lobe, the right side and the central ridge define a right concavity in the face and the left lobe, the left side and the central ridge define a left concavity in the face.
Claims
1. A ventral support for use in an ergonomic work station chair, the ventral support comprising an extendible, flexible Y axis member and a support unit, the support unit pivotally attached to the extendible, flexible Y axis member, wherein the support unit is heart-shaped and includes a rear, a face, and a top therebetween, the face including a right lobe and a left lobe, a clavicles support, which has a right side and a left side, is raised, is proximate the top and is horizontally disposed, and a central ridge, which extends vertically downward from the clavicles support, wherein the right lobe, the right side and the central ridge define a right concavity in the face and the left lobe, the left side and the central ridge define a left concavity in the face.
2. The ventral support of claim 1, further comprising a horizontal forearm member and a forearm support height adjustor, the forearm support height adjustor attached to the extendible, flexible Y axis member.
3. The ventral support of claim 2, further comprising support clamps attached to the extendible, flexible Y axis member and the horizontal forearm member.
4. The ventral support of claim 1, further comprising a Z axis member, which is a threaded rod including a distal end and a proximal end, the proximal end attached to the rear of the support unit and the distal end including a knob and extending through the extendible, flexible Y axis member.
5. The ventral support of claim 4, further comprising a second Z axis member attached to the rear of the support unit and the extendible, flexible Y axis member, the second Z axis member disposed below the Z axis member.
6. The ventral support of claim 5, wherein the second Z axis member is pivotally attached to the rear of the support unit and the extendible, flexible Y axis member.
7. An upper body support for use in an ergonomic work station chair, the upper body support comprising: an adjustable Y axis member; a support unit, the support unit pivotally attached to the extendible, flexible Y axis member, wherein the support unit includes a rear, a face, and a top therebetween, the face including a right lobe and a left lobe, a clavicles support which has a right side and a left side, is raised, is proximate the top and is horizontally disposed, and a central ridge, which extends vertically downward from the clavicles support, wherein the right lobe, the right side and the central ridge define a right concavity in the face and the left lobe, the left side and the central ridge define a left concavity in the face; a Z axis member, the Z axis member including a distal end and a proximal end, the proximal end attached to the rear of the support unit and the distal end attached to the extendible, flexible Y axis member; an adjustable horizontal forearm member, which is independently vertically adjustably mounted to the Y axis member; and a pair of forearm supports horizontally adjustably mounted on the adjustable horizontal forearm member.
8. The upper body support of claim 7, wherein the Z axis member is independently adjustably attached to the rear of the support unit and the extendible, flexible Y axis member.
9. The upper body support of claim 8, comprising two Z axis members each adjustably attached to the rear of the support unit and the extendible, flexible Y axis member, to allow in and out movement and tilting of the support unit.
10. An ergonomic work station chair comprising a plurality of legs, a seat post centrally mounted on the plurality of legs, a seat mounted on the seat post, the seat including a distal end and a proximal end, and an upper body support, the upper body support including: an extendible, flexible Y axis member, the extendible, flexible Y axis member adjustably attached to the seat; a support unit, the support unit pivotally attached to the extendible, flexible Y axis member, wherein the support unit includes a rear, a face, and a top therebetween, the face including a right lobe and a left lobe, a clavicles support which has a right side and a left side, is raised, is proximate the top and is horizontally disposed, and a central ridge, which extends vertically downward from the clavicles support, wherein the right lobe, the right side and the central ridge define a right concavity in the face and the left lobe, the left side and the central ridge define a left concavity in the face; an adjustable horizontal forearm member, which is independently vertically adjustably mounted on the extendible, flexible Y axis member; and a pair of forearm supports horizontally adjustably mounted on the adjustable horizontal forearm member and extending rearward towards the distal end of the seat.
11. The ergonomic work station chair of claim 10, further comprising a forearm support height adjustor mounted on the extendible, flexible Y axis member for moving the horizontal forearm member up and down independently from the support unit.
12. The ergonomic work station chair of claim 11, further comprising a Y axis member length adjustor mounted on the extendible, flexible Y axis member for adjusting a length of the extendible, flexible Y axis member.
13. The ergonomic work station chair of claim 12, further comprising a Z axis member, which is a threaded rod including a distal end and a proximal end, the proximal end attached to the rear of the support unit and the distal end including a knob and extending through the extendible, flexible Y axis member.
14. The ergonomic work station chair of claim 13, further comprising a second Z axis member attached to the rear of the support unit and the extendible, flexible Y axis member, the second Z axis member disposed below the Z axis member.
15. The ergonomic work station chair of claim 14, wherein the second Z axis member is pivotally attached to the rear of the support unit and the extendible, flexible Y axis member.
16. A method of promoting a user's natural cervical lordosis and lumbar lordosis, the method comprising: the user sitting in the ergonomic work station chair of claim 10; the user contacting the clavicles support with their clavicles and the central ridge with their sternum; and the user leaning into the clavicles support and the central ridge, thereby promoting the user's natural cervical lordosis and lumbar lordosis.
17. The method of claim 16 further comprising the user decompressing their lumbar spine by pressing their forearms into the forearm supports.
18. The method of claim 17, further comprising adjusting the adjustable horizontal forearm member up and down to maximize proper positioning of the user.
19. The method of claim 18, further comprising adjusting the support unit up or down to maximize positioning of the user.
20. The method of claim 19, further comprising tilting the support unit to maximize positioning of the user.
Description
FIGURES
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DESCRIPTION
(7) Except as otherwise expressly provided, the following rules of interpretation apply to this specification (written description, and claims): (a) all words used herein shall be construed to be of such gender or number (singular or plural) as the circumstances require; (b) the singular terms a, an, and the, as used in the specification and the appended claims include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise; (c) the antecedent term about applied to a recited range or value denotes an approximation within the deviation in the range or value known or expected in the art from the measurements method; (d) the words herein, hereby, hereof, hereto, hereinbefore, and hereinafter, and words of similar import, refer to this specification in its entirety and not to any particular paragraph, claim or other subdivision, unless otherwise specified; (e) descriptive headings are for convenience only and shall not control or affect the meaning or construction of any part of the specification; and (f) or and any are not exclusive and include and including are not limiting. Further, the terms comprising, having, including, and containing are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning including, but not limited to,) unless otherwise noted.
(8) To the extent necessary to provide descriptive support, the subject matter and/or text of the appended claims is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
(9) Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. Where a specific range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range, is included therein. All smaller sub ranges are also included. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges are also included therein, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range.
(10) Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the relevant art. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also be used, the acceptable methods and materials are now described.
(11) The design of the ergonomic chair creates anterior support to the human frame in the seated, slightly leaning forward, position. The sternum support encourages lumbar and cervical lordosis while minimizing thoracic kyphosis. The forearm supports reduces lower spinal compression through bracing or downward forearm pressure. The body is not forced into a position, which could be an abnormal position with the supports, but rather the supports passively encourage the body into its normal posture.
(12) There is also some support that occurs from direct pressure on the costocartilage, which are the structures that connect the sternum to the ribs anteriorly. The general support comes from the sternum, sterno-clavicular joints, costocartilage and then through the ribs which in turn support the spine. There is also additional support from the sternum, sternoclavicular joints and clavicles.
(13) An ergonomic chair, generally referred to as 8 is shown in
(14) As shown in
(15) As shown in
(16) The integrated support 50 is anatomically correct. It can be adjusted in and out at the top and bottom and can pivot about the top and the bottom to allow for maximum adjustability.
(17) In one embodiment, the support unit can replace the standard seat back of an office chair.
(18)
(19) As shown in
(20) In an alternative embodiment shown in
(21) Also shown in
(22) In use, the user adjusts the supports along the X, Y and Z axis as needed and sits in the ventral position. Seat height, seat tilt, arm support height, distance between the arm supports, angle of the Y axis member, height of the support unit and tilt of the support unit can all be adjusted. In the ventral position, the user is supported on the clavicles and upper sternum by the chair front (integrated support member and Y axis member), allowing the cervical spine and lumbar spine to settle into their natural lordosis. The chair front does not press or force the spine into a position. The lower sternum is also supported but is not critical to positioning of the user's spine in it natural position. The user simply sits in the chair, contacts the supports and leans slightly into them. By pressing slightly on the forearm support, the user decompresses their spine.
Example
(23) Twenty adult males with no history of spinal fracture, spinal surgery, tumor, inflammatory arthropathy, and/or a back-pain episode in the last 6 months were recruited from the local population. Two, 1-hour sitting sessions in the morning at the same time of day and at least twenty-four hours apart were completed using a prototype chair of the present technology, designed to minimize spine compression, which was compared to a control configuration (the saddle seat pan of the prototype chair alone). The chair conditions were randomly presented between days using simple randomization. All participants completed the informed consent process prior to starting the study.
(24) Seated spine height, measured with digital stadiometer and perceived back pain, measured with a digital 100 mm visual analog scale, were taken immediately before and after the 1-hour sitting trial. During the one hour sitting trial, accelerometer and seat pressure were collected continuously. A qualitative questionnaire (5 point Likert scale, 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree) assessing perceived support, comfort, tiredness, and stiffness was completed after the final spine height measure at the end of each experimental session.
(25) A one-way general linear ANOVA was used to compare the following variables between chair conditions: change in spine height, average lumbar and pelvic angles during the sitting trial, change in perceived pain throughout the sitting trial, average seat pressure, peak pressure, average seat contact area, and average center of pressure (COP) location by Row and Column of the pressure mat. The level of significance was set at p0.05.
(26) Spine Height:
(27) Spine height change was significantly smaller in the decompression design condition (0.08 cm0.38 cm) compared to the control condition (0.620.04 cm; p=0.00, 2=0.32).
(28) Seat Pressure:
(29) Contact area on the seat pan was significantly smaller during the decompression design condition (863.4285.56 cm2) than during the control condition (908.8549.07 cm2; p=0.49, 2=0.10). Participants sat significantly more anterior on the seat pan in the decompression design condition (CoP Row 20.561.67 cm) compared to control condition (18.031.92 cm; p=0.00, 2=0.34). There were no significant differences for the COP Column co-ordinate (side to side) between the decompression design (21.480.98 cm) and control conditions (21.460.07 cm; p=0.94, 2=0.00). Average and peak pressures were also not significantly different (p=0.38, 2=0.02 and p=0.24, 2=0.04) between the decompression design (0.660.04 and 2.680.63 N/cm2) and control conditions (0.640.08 and 2.420.70 N/cm2).
(30) Spine Angles:
(31) Average lumbar and pelvic angles were not significantly different between the chair conditions. Specifically, the average lumbar angles (in both degrees and % ROM) for the decompression design and control conditions were 0.8011.24 (56.2419.90% ROM) and 0.0211.26 (54.5219.43% ROM) respectively (p=0.83, 2=0.00 and p=0.79, 2=0.00). Average pelvic angles (in both degrees and degrees relative to upright standing) for the decompression design and control conditions were 1.680.88 (5.252.38) and 1.540.80 (4.302.28) respectively (p=0.62, 2=0.01 and p=0.22, 2=0.04).
(32) Perceived Low Back Pain:
(33) The average change in pain for the low back was generally low and not significantly different between the decompression design (1.664.59 mm) and control configuration (3.938.25 mm; p=0.31, 2=0.029). Similarly, the average change in perceived pain for the gluteal region was not significantly different between the decompression design (8.9710.85 mm) and control condition (13.7412.20 mm; p=0.21, 2=0.043).
(34) Exit Questionnaire:
(35) The exit questionnaire showed that participants found the decompression design condition more supportive (3.89) than the control condition (2.80; p=0.01, 2=0.25). Participants indicated more often that they would have liked more support from the decompression (3.45) than the control condition provided (2.56; p=0.30, 2=0.12). No significant differences between the decompression design and the control condition were found when the participants were asked if the chair allowed them to sit with an upright posture (4.33 and 4.00; p=0.28, 2=0.03), if the chair matches their idea of a standard office chair (2.28 and 2.40; p=0.75, 2=0.03), or their back feels stiff (2.56 and 2.60; p=0.90, 2=0.00) or tired (2.28 and 2.79; p=0.27, 2=0.03) after the sitting exposure.
(36) While example embodiments have been described in connection with what is presently considered to be an example of a possible most practical and/or suitable embodiment, it is to be understood that the descriptions are not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the example embodiment. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific example embodiments specifically described herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed in the scope of the claims, if appended hereto or subsequently filed.