Brownmillerite oxides for oxygen evolution catalyst

Abstract

An oxygen evolution catalyst of the formula: Sr.sub.2MCoO.sub.5 where M=Al, Ga wherein M is bonded with four oxygen atoms to form a tetrahedron. The catalyst is operated at a potential of less than 1.58 volts vs. RHE at a current density of 50 A/cm.sup.2 for a pH of 7-13. The catalyst is operated at a potential of less than 1.55 volts vs. RHE at a current density of 50 A/cm.sup.2 and a pH of 13. The oxygen evolution catalyst of the formula: Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 wherein the catalyst is operated at a potential of less than 1.53 volts vs. RHE at a current density of 50 A/cm.sup.2 and a pH of 7. The oxygen evolution catalyst of formula: Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 wherein the catalyst maintains a current within 94% after 300 minutes at a potential of 1.645 volts vs. RHE wherein the current is greater than 1 milliamp and a pH of 7.

Claims

1. An oxygen evolution catalyst comprising a material of the formula: Sr2MCoO5 where M=Al, Ga wherein M is bonded with four oxygen atoms to form a tetrahedron and including conductive particles and a binder combined with particles of formula: Sr2MCoO5 where M=Al, Ga.

2. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 1 wherein the catalyst is operated at a potential of less than 1.58 volts vs. RHE at a current density of 50 A/cm2 and a pH of from 7 to 13.

3. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 1 wherein the catalyst is operated at a potential of less than 1.55 volts vs. RHE at a current density of 50 A/cm2 and a pH of 13.

4. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 1 wherein the material maintains a current within 97% after 300 minutes at potentials of from 1.51 to 1.55 volts vs. RHE.

5. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 1 wherein the material has the formula Sr2AlCoO5 and is operated at a potential of less than 1.55 volts vs. RHE at a current density of 50 A/cm2 and a pH of 13.

6. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 5 wherein the material maintains a current within 97% after 300 minutes at a potential of 1.55 volts vs. RHE.

7. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 5 wherein the material has a Tafel slope of 89 mV per decade.

8. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 1 wherein the material has the formula Sr2GaCoO5 and is operated at a potential of less than 1.51 volts vs. RHE at a current density of 50 A/cm2 and a pH of 13.

9. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 8 wherein the material maintains a current within 97% after 300 minutes at a potential of 1.51 volts vs. RHE.

10. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 8 wherein the material has a Tafel slope of 51 mV per decade.

11. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 1 including An a material of the formula: Sr2GaCoO5 wherein the catalyst is operated at a potential of less than 1.53 volts vs. RHE at a current density of 50 A/cm2 and a pH of 7.

12. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 11 wherein the material maintains a current within 96% after 300 minutes at a potential of 1.530 volts vs. RHE.

13. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 11 wherein the material maintains a current within 96% after 300 minutes at a potential of 1.593 volts vs. RHE.

14. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 11 wherein the material maintains a current within 94% after 300 minutes at a potential of 1.645 volts vs. RHE.

15. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 14 wherein the current is greater than 1 milliamp.

16. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 11 wherein the material has a Tafel slope of 87 mV per decade.

17. The oxygen evolution catalyst of claim 1 wherein the catalyst is operated at a potential of less than 1.58 volts vs. RHE at a current density of 50 A/cm2 and a pH of 7.

18. An oxygen evolution catalyst comprising a material of the formula: Sr2GaCoO5 wherein the catalyst maintains a current within 94% after 300 minutes at a potential of 1.645 volts vs. RHE wherein the current is greater than 1 milliamp and a pH of 7.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1A is a graphic depiction of the crystal structure of a perovskite compound;

(2) FIG. 1B is a graphic depiction of the crystal structure of a brownmillerite compound;

(3) FIG. 2A is an x-ray diffraction pattern for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5;

(4) FIG. 2B is an x-ray diffraction pattern for Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5;

(5) FIG. 3 is a linear sweep voltammetry plot for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5, and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 catalyst materials at 1 mV/s at pH 13;

(6) FIG. 4 are galvanostatic plots for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 catalyst materials at 50 A/cm.sup.2 and pH 13;

(7) FIG. 5A is a potentiostatic plot measured at 1.51 V vs. RHE for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 and pH 13;

(8) FIG. 5B is a potentiostatic plot measured at 1.55 V vs. RHE for Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 and pH 13;

(9) FIG. 6 is a Tafel plot of Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 at pH 13;

(10) FIG. 7 is a Tafel plot of Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 at pH 13;

(11) FIG. 8 are cyclic voltammetry (CV) plots for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 at 10 mV/s at pH 7 from 1 to 100 cycles;

(12) FIG. 9 are cyclic voltammetry plots for Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 at 10 mV/s at pH 7 from 1 to 100 cycles;

(13) FIG. 10 are galvanostatic plots for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 catalyst materials at 20 A/cm.sup.2, 50 A/cm.sup.2, and 100 A/cm.sup.2 and pH 7;

(14) FIG. 11 are galvanostatic plots for Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 catalyst materials at 50 A/cm.sup.2 and pH 7;

(15) FIG. 12 are potentiostatic plots measured at 1.530 V vs. RHE, 1.593 V vs. RHE and 1.645 V vs. RHE and pH 7 for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5;

(16) FIG. 13 are potentiostatic plots measured at 1.580 V vs. RHE and pH 7 for Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5;

(17) FIG. 14 are TEM images of Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 before (a) and after (b) 100 electrochemical cycles;

(18) FIG. 15 are TEM images of Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 before (a) and after (b) 100 electrochemical cycles;

(19) FIG. 16 is a Tafel plot of Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 at pH 7 with IrO.sub.2 for comparison.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(20) The present disclosure provides catalyst compositions for an oxygen evolution reaction (OER) such as the oxidation of water to generate oxygen gases. A catalyst as used herein, means a material that is involved in and increases the rate of a chemical electrolysis reaction (or other electrochemical reaction) and which itself, undergoes reaction as part of the electrolysis, but is largely unconsumed by the reaction itself, and may participate in multiple chemical transformations. A catalytic material may be consumed in slight quantities during some uses and may be, in many embodiments, regenerated to its original chemical state. The reaction may include an oxygen evolution reaction or water oxidation reaction.

(21) In one aspect, an oxygen evolution catalyst includes a material of the formula: Sr.sub.2MCoO.sub.5 where M=Al and Ga. The material may include structures related to brown elite oxides of the above formula where the M atom is bonded with four oxygen atoms to form a tetrahedron and are highly active and stable catalysts for an oxygen evolution reaction at various conditions such as at various pH levels such as from 7-13.

(22) In one aspect, the brownmillerite oxides may be combined with conductive particles such as carbon black and may include a binder such as NAFION, a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene based fluoropolymer copolymer sold by DuPont. The combined material may be attached to an electrode substrate using any method known to those in the art. Various electrode substrates may be utilized that are capable of conducting current such as for example, glassy carbon, carbon black or other materials.

(23) The catalyst can include a plurality of particles of the formula Sr.sub.2MCoO.sub.5 where M=Al and Ga. The catalyst material of the above formula may be prepared by various methods including solid-state reactions, as will be discussed in more detail below.

(24) The catalyst is further described by the following examples, which are illustrative and are not intended as limiting the scope as defined in the claims.

EXAMPLES

(25) Preparation of Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 Catalyst Materials.

(26) Sr.sub.2MCoO.sub.5 (M=Ga and Al) were synthesized by solid-state reaction. Stoichiometric amounts of SrCO.sub.3, Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 (or Al.sub.2O.sub.3) and Co.sub.3O.sub.4 (all 99.9% pure, from Sigma Aldrich) were ball milled together and placed in an alumina crucible for calcination at 1100 C. for 24 hours. The mixtures were then carefully grinded in a mortar followed by sintering. The sintering for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 was at 1100 C. for 216 hours with 3 intermediate re-grindings whereas it was at 1250 C. for 288 hours with 4 intermediate re-grinding for Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5. The pure phase was attained for both materials, as shown in the X-ray diffraction patterns of FIG. 2. Both materials are pure brownmillerite single phase. (A) can be assigned to PDF 04-011-4323 and (B) to PDF 04-006-6079.

(27) To fabricate a working electrode, a catalyst ink was first prepared by sonicating a mixture of catalyst particles, carbon black (CB), and Nation solution with tetrahydofuran (THF) with a catalyst concentration of 5 mg/mL, and then drop-casting (10 L) onto pre-polished glassy carbon disk electrodes (5 mm in diameter).

Example 1

(28) Linear sweep voltammogram (LSV) of Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 catalyst materials was performed. Working electrodes as described above were utilized. The electrochemical measurements were done in a three-electrode glass cell (125 ml) with the working electrode rotating at a rate of 1600 rpm, and Ag/AgCl (3M NaCl) as the reference. The counter electrode (Pt coil) was isolated from e main electrochemical cell using a fritted glass tube. The electrolyte utilized was of 0.1M KOH (pH 13).

(29) LSV plots for the Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 particles at a pH of 13 are shown in FIG. 3. The LSV plots were generated at a scan rate of 1 mV/s. The overpotential of 50 A/cm.sup.2 was used as an indicator for demonstrated OER activity with activity values for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 of 0.28 V and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 of 0.32 V. These values are comparable to Ba.sub.0.5Sr.sub.0.5Co.sub.0.8Fe.sub.0.2O.sub.3- (BSCF) considered to be state of the art prior art catalyst and demonstate the use of the above catalysts in an OER reaction.

Example 2

(30) Galvanostatic testing was also performed on the materials using the same working electrode and experimental cell as described above. Referring to FIG. 4, galvanostatic plots for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 catalyst materials at 50 A/cm.sup.2 and pH 13 are provided.

(31) As can be seen in the plots, the catalytic materials demonstrated a stability after an initial startup of the procedure with a near flat plot for a period out to 300 minutes.

Example 3

(32) Potentiostatic measurements were performed on the Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 catalyst materials using the apparatus as described above. FIG. 5 is a potentiostatic plot measured at 1.51 V vs. RHE for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5, and 1.55 V vs. RHE for Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5. As can be seen in the plots the catalytic materials demonstrated a stability after an initial startup of the procedure. The current remains stable and within 97% of its value after 300 minutes for all of the catalytic materials. The stability of the materials exceeds those of prior art materials that may degrade over time.

Example 4

(33) The value of the Tafel slope represents an important parameter to estimate the performance of an OER catalyst. The Tafel slope indicates the current density changes with increasing overpotential. Tafel plot measurements of the catalyst materials at pH 13 are shown in FIGS. 6-7. The Tafel slopes for the materials are 51 mV/decade for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5, and 89 mV/decade for Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 catalyst materials. The Tafel slopes indicate a good activity that combined with the superior stability makes the materials desirable OER catalysts.

Example 5

(34) Additional electrochemical tests were performed in pH 7 0.4 M NaH.sub.2PO.sub.4, 0.6 M Na.sub.2SO.sub.4 solution (NaOH was used to adjust pH to 7) in three electrode cells.

(35) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) of Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 catalyst materials was performed at pH 7. Working electrodes as described above were utilized. The electrochemical measurements were done in a three-electrode glass cell (125 ml) with the working electrode rotating at a rate of 1600 rpm, and Ag/AgCl (3M NaCl) as the reference. The counter electrode (Pt coil) was isolated from the main electrochemical cell using a fritted glass tube.

(36) CV plots for 1 to 100 cycles for the Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 particles at a pH of 7 are shown in FIGS. 8 and 9. The CV plots were generated at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. Compared to Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5, Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 exhibited higher (i.e. lower overpotential at fixed current or vice versa) and more stable OER activities.

Example 6

(37) Galvanostatic testing was also performed on the material using the same working electrode and experimental cell as described above. Referring to FIG. 10 galvanostatic plots for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 catalyst material at 20 A/cm.sup.2, 50 A/cm2, 100 A/cm.sup.2 and pH 7 are provided. Referring to FIG. 11 galvanostatic plots for Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 catalyst material at 50 A/cm2 and pH 7 is provided. As can be seen in the plots the catalytic materials demonstrated a stability after an initial startup of the procedure with a near flat plot for a period out to 300 minutes.

Example 7

(38) Potentiostatic measurements were performed on the Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 catalyst materials at pH 7 using the apparatus as described above. FIG. 12 are potentiostatic plots measured at 1.530 V vs. RHE, 1.593 V vs. RHE and 1.645 V vs. RHE for Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 whereas FIG. 13 is a potentiostatic plot measured at 1.580 V vs. RHE for Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5. Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 exhibited superior stability. At 1.530 and 1.593 V, the current remains within 96% of its value after 300 minutes and at 1.645 V the current is at mA level and remains within 94% of its value after 300 minutes. The stability of the Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 exceeds those of any prior art materials which typically degrade dramatically at pH 7. Further evidence of the Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 stability against OER came from TEM imaging. The surfaces of as-synthesized Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 and Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 are perfectly crystalline (FIGS. 14(a) and 15(a)). After 100 electrochemical cycling, almost no change in the surfaces of Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 was observed while a certain degree of amorphization occurred for Sr.sub.2AlCoO.sub.5 after OER measurements (FIGS. 14(b) and 15(b)).

Example 8

(39) Tafel plot measurements of the catalyst material Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 at pH 7 are shown in FIG. 16 with IrO.sub.2 for comparison. Sr.sub.2GaCoO.sub.5 represents on order of magnitude more active than IrO.sub.2.

(40) While particular embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be understood that various other changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter. Moreover, although various aspects of the claimed subject matter have been described herein, such aspects need not be utilized in combination. It is therefore intended that the appended claims cover all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of the claimed subject matter.