Contaminant removal method for fractionating columns
10927307 ยท 2021-02-23
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B01D3/34
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D3/32
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01D3/34
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
Methods for removing water and/or dissolved and solid contaminants from a liquid hydrocarbon such as condensate flowing through a fractionating column are disclosed. Pressure within the column and temperature at which the reboiler operates are observed to prevent boiling of the contaminated hydrocarbon thus obviating contaminant deposition on heated surfaces. Further methods directed to column operation and anti-fouling procedures augment the core method. Apparatus to effect the methods is also provided.
Claims
1. A method of extracting contaminants from a liquid hydrocarbon feed stream containing water, contaminants and mixtures thereof, comprising: providing a fractionating circuit; passing said liquid hydrocarbon feed stream into said fractionating circuit; maintaining pressure and temperature in said circuit at levels suitable to prevent boiling of said water, contaminants and mixtures thereof from said liquid hydrocarbon feed stream; isolating water, contaminant and mixtures thereof from liquid hydrocarbons from said liquid hydrocarbon feed stream after fractionation and removing isolated water, contaminant and mixtures thereof from said circuit.
2. The method as set forth in claim 1, further including the step of providing a separator in said circuit for separating liquid hydrocarbons, contaminant and water.
3. The method as set forth in claim 1, further including the step of introducing fresh water at predetermined positions in said circuit.
4. The method as set forth in claim 2, further including the step of recycling contaminant rich water from said separator into said feed stream to be treated.
5. The method as set forth in claim 1, further including the step of introducing an additive to increase contaminant solubility in said feed stream.
6. The method as set forth in claim 1, further including the step of treating mechanical components in said fractionating circuit to reduce contaminant accretion.
7. The method as set forth in claim 6, wherein treating includes at least one of chemical and mechanical treatment.
8. The method as set forth in claim 1, further including the step of operating a fractionating column in said circuit in three phase mode to increase mixing for augmented contaminant removal.
9. The method as set forth in claim 7, further including the step of introducing fresh water at predetermined positions in said circuit.
10. The method as set forth in claim 2, further including the step of recycling separated contaminant rich water from said separator into said feed stream to be treated.
11. The method as set forth in claim 10, further including the step of introducing an additive to increase contaminant solubility in said feed stream.
12. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said contaminant includes at least one of salt and salt compounds.
13. The method as set forth in claim 1, further including practicing, in sequence with the method of claim 1, at least one of: A) step of providing a separator in said circuit for separating liquid hydrocarbons, contaminant and water; B) introducing fresh water at predetermined positions in said circuit; C) recycling separated contaminant rich water from said separator into said feed stream to be treated; D) introducing an additive to increase contaminant solubility in said feed stream; E) treating mechanical components in said fractionating circuit to reduce contaminant accretion; F) operating a fractionating column in said circuit in three phase mode to increase mixing for augmented contaminant removal; and G) treating overhead vapours evolving from said fractionating circuit.
14. A method of reducing salt fouling from a feed stream containing liquid hydrocarbons, salt and water in a fractionating circuit having a feed separator, tower and reboiler, comprising: feeding said feed stream into said feed separator to form a secondary feed stream; feeding said secondary feed stream into said tower; and maintaining pressure in said tower and temperature in said fractionating tower reboiler to prevent boiling of water in said secondary feed stream.
15. The method as set forth in claim 14, further including the step of introducing a second separator between a bottom of said tower and said fractionating tower reboiler for ancillary removal of salt and water from said secondary feed stream.
16. The method as set forth in claim 14, further including the step of injecting fresh water at predetermined positions in said circuit.
17. The method as set forth in claim 16, wherein said predetermined positions include after said feed separator.
18. The method as set forth in claim 16, wherein said predetermined positions include in said secondary feed stream prior to introduction into said tower.
19. The method as set forth in claim 16, wherein said predetermined positions include in said tower at a bottom thereof.
20. The method as set forth in claim 16, wherein said predetermined positions include adjacent an inlet of said secondary separator.
21. The method as set forth in claim 16, wherein said predetermined positions include at said reboiler.
22. The method as set forth in claim 15, further including the step of recycling salt water from said second separator to said feed stream.
23. Fractionating apparatus circuit for extracting contaminant from a feed stream containing liquid hydrocarbons, contaminant and water, said apparatus including a fractionating tower , a feed separator and reboiler comprising: a reboiler separator positioned in fluid communication with said fractionating tower and said reboiler.
24. Fractionating apparatus circuit for extracting contaminant from a feed stream containing liquid hydrocarbons, contaminant and water, comprising: a feed separator for initial separation of contaminant from said feed stream; a fractionating tower for hydrocarbon separation; a feed bottom exchanger for conditioning said feed stream prior to treatment in said fractionating tower; a reboiler for maintaining temperature in said circuit; and a secondary separator in fluid communication with said reboiler and the bottom of said fractionating tower.
25. The fractionating apparatus as set forth in claim 24, further including water injection points at predetermined areas in said circuit.
26. The fractionating apparatus as set forth in claim 24, further including a contaminant water recycle circuit between an output of said secondary separator and said feed separator.
27. The fractionating apparatus as set forth in claim 24, further including a wash circuit at said reboiler for recycling water separated in said secondary separator to said feed bottom exchanger.
28. The fractionating apparatus as set forth in claim 24, further including a fractionating tower overhead vapour treatment circuit.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6) Similar numerals used in the Figures denote similar elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
(7) Referring now to the Figures,
(8) Separated contaminants exit at 16 with overhead vapours 18 and saleable hydrocarbons 20 separated as well.
(9) Further processing of the secondary feed stream 24 extends through to the fractionating tower 28. Overhead vapours are removed from fractionating tower 28 at 30. In the prior art example, the fractionating tower is typically operated at pressures between 40-70 psig.
(10) Hydrocarbon material exiting the fractionating tower 28 at fractionating tower bottom 32 is circulated through reboiler 34 which typically operates at between 120 C. and 140 C. A recirculation loop 36 is provided as well as a removal loop 38 for saleable hydrocarbon removal.
(11) Turning to
(12) Table 1 tabulates results demonstrating the benefits of varying the operating conditions on contaminant reduction.
(13) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE OPERATING CONDITIONS AND RESULTANT DEPOSITION Fractionating Tower Reboiler Contaminant Deposited Pressure Temperature in Reboiler Shell (psig) ( C.) (kg/d) 1 56.0 17.1 5 66.0 66.3 10 75.0 250.0 20 88.5 521.1 30 98.0 663.9 40 106.0 761.9 50 113.0 832.3 60 119.0 880.3 70 124.5 918.2
(14) These significant results clearly substantiate the benefit of manipulating pressure and temperature without unit operation interruption in the circuit. This is in contrast to what is practiced in the art which inherently includes shutdown to decontaminate components in the circuit. The present technology provides a more elegant and seamless solution to contaminant management without process upset or interruption.
(15) Conveniently, by reducing the operating temperature and pressure conditions within the system, the possibility of chloride induced stress corrosion cracking (CISCC) due to the presence of contaminants in the system is also reduced.
(16) For additional versatility in the methodology of the present invention, the fractionating tower 28 may be operated to create three phases, liquid, vapour and liquid water. Due to the intimate mixing between all three phases in the column, the ability of the water to remove contaminants found in the liquid stream is increased.
(17) Referring now to
(18) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 CONTAMINANT DEPOSITION WITH INCORPORATED REBOILER UPSTREAM SEPARATOR Stabilizer Tower Reboiler Contaminant deposited Pressure Temperature in reboiler shell (psig) ( C.) (kg/d) 1 56 16.1 5 66 58.6 10 84 58.6 20 103.5 58.6 30 117 58.6 40 129 58.6 50 139 58.6 60 149 58.6 70 157 58.5
The data clearly demonstrates the benefits of adding a reboiler upstream separator for contaminant removal when considered in comparison to the data contained in Table 1.
(19)
(20) Overhead vapours 18 exiting feed separator 14 may be treated in a scrubbing circuit 62 in which vapours 18 are fed into an overhead compressor suction scrubber 64, compressed with compressor 66 and passed into an overhead condenser 68. The condensate is then fed into a discharge separator 70 with condensate recirculated in circuit 72 to the raw hydrocarbon liquids 12. Further, overhead vapours from fractionating tower 28 exiting at 30 may be introduced into circuit 72 at 74. The condensate could be recirculated to any of the water injection points mentioned previously. The benefits of the water injection operations are evinced by the data presented in Tables 3 and 4.
(21) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 CONTAMINANT DEPOSITION WITH INCORPORATED WATER INJECTION AT POINT 54 OF FIG. 4 IN FEED/BOTTOMS EXCHANGER 26 OF FIG. 4 Contaminant deposited Water Injection in exchanger (bbl/d) (kg) 0 11.4 10 9.5 25 7.6 50 5.7 100 3.8 200 2.28 300 1.63 400 1.26 500 1.03 600 0.87 700 0.77
(22) The data demonstrates the benefits of water injection upstream of the feed/bottoms exchanger on contaminant removal.
(23) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 CONTAMINANT DEPOSITION WITH INCORPORATED WATER INJECTION AT POINT 58 OF FIG. 4 IN FRACTIONATION TOWER REBOILER 34 OF FIG. 4 Contaminant deposited Water Injection in reboiler (bbl/day) (kg) 0 58.56 10 58.56 25 58.56 50 58.56 100 58.56 150 46.39 200 35.44 300 24.07 400 18.23 500 14.66 600 12.27 800 9.24 1000 7.42 1500 4.96
(24) The data demonstrates the benefits of water injection in the fractionation tower reboiler on contaminant removal.
(25) Referring now to
(26) In order to further augment deposition prevention, each component in the circuit prone to deposition may include fouling protection. This may take the form of an electrical or mechanical system or treatment. As an example, laser etching interior surfaces of components for hydrophobicity purposes may be used to ameliorate deposition. Other means for inducing or otherwise creating hydrophobic surfaces which are known in the art may be implemented to this end.
(27) Regarding other features of the technology referenced herein, solubility enhancing additive(s) may be injected into the circuit to improve contaminant solubility in the water, leading to increased contaminant removal. Suitable additives will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
(28) For convenience, the injection sites may be those referenced in
(29) Further, for even greater contaminant deposition protection, the deposition prone surfaces in the circuit may be coated with a compound(s) which resist the contaminant and thus fouling. As an example, thermoplastic polymers, polyphenylenesulfide (PPS) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-blended PPS may be used as well as a host of other examples known in the art.
(30) It will be understood that the features in